https://arxiv.org/api/fzuS7tRNp9GWqJKOAeaso8ELhzE 2026-03-22T12:59:17Z 1629 45 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07102v6 2026-02-05T00:45:31Z

Instrumental variables (IVs) are widely used to estimate causal effects from non-randomized data. A canonical example is a randomized trial with noncompliance, in which the randomized treatment assignment serves as an IV for the non-ignorable treatment received. Under a monotonicity assumption, a valid IV nonparametrically identifies the average treatment effect among a latent complier subgroup, whose generalizability is often under debate. In many studies, there exist multiple versions of an IV, for instance, different nudges to take the same treatment in different study sites in a multicenter clinical trial. These different versions of an IV may result in different compliance rates and offer a unique opportunity to study IV estimates' generalizability. In this article, we introduce a novel nested IV assumption and study identification of the average treatment effect among two latent subgroups: always-compliers and switchers, who are defined based on the joint potential treatment received under two versions of a binary IV. We derive the efficient influence function for the SWitcher Average Treatment Effect (SWATE) under a nonparametric model and propose efficient estimators. We then propose formal statistical tests of the generalizability of IV estimates under the nested IV framework. The proposed tests are flexible nonparametric generalizations of classical overidentification tests that allow estimating nuisance parameters using machine learning tools. We apply the proposed method to the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial and study the causal effect of colorectal cancer screening and its generalizability.

2024-05-11T22:05:52Z Rui Wang Ying-Qi Zhao Oliver Dukes Bo Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04762v1 2026-02-04T16:58:58Z

Small and medium-sized islands are acutely exposed to climate change and ecosystem degradation, yet the extent to which uncertainty is systematically addressed in scientific assessments of their ecosystem services remains poorly understood. This study revisits 226 peer-reviewed articles drawn from two global systematic reviews on island ecosystem services and climate change, applying a structured post hoc analysis to evaluate how uncertainty is treated across methods, service categories, ecosystem realms, and decision contexts. Studies were classified according to whether uncertainty was explicitly analysed, just mentioned, or ignored. Only 30 percent of studies incorporated uncertainty explicitly, while more than half did not address it at all. Scenario-based approaches dominated uncertainty assessment, whereas probabilistic and ensemble-based frameworks remained limited. Cultural ecosystem services and extreme climate impacts exhibited the lowest levels of uncertainty integration, and few studies connected uncertainty treatment to policy relevant decision frameworks. Weak or absent treatment of uncertainty emerges as a structural challenge in island systems, where narrow ecological thresholds, strong land-sea coupling, limited spatial buffers, and reduced institutional redundancy amplify the consequences of decision-making under incomplete knowledge. Systematic mapping of how uncertainty is framed, operationalised, or neglected reveals persistent methodological and conceptual gaps and informs concrete directions for strengthening uncertainty integration in future island-focused ecosystem service and climate assessments. Embedding uncertainty more robustly into modelling practices, participatory processes, and policy tools is essential for enhancing scientific credibility, governance relevance, and adaptive capacity in insular socio-ecological systems.

2026-02-04T16:58:58Z Nazli Demirel Ioannis N. Vogiatzakis George Zittis Mirela Tase Attila D. Sandor Savvas Zotos Christos Zoumides Turgay Dindaroglu Mauro Fois Irene Christoforidi Valentini Stamatiadou Shiri Zemah-Shamir Tamer Albayrak Cigdem Kaptan Ayhan Paraskevi Manolaki Ina Sieber Ziv Zemah-Shamir Elli Tzirkalli Aristides Moustakas http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04353v1 2026-02-04T09:22:40Z

Suppose some cleverness score parameter is sufficiently interesting to be defined and then measured, perhaps for different strata of specialists or for the broader population. Such phenomena could have Gaussian distributions, when it comes to all players in a stratum, but when interest focuses on the very tails, for the top few percent, those above certain high thresholds, different models are called for, along with the need to analyse such based on the listed top scores only. In this note I develop such models and tools, and apply them to the top-100 and above 2100 points lists for regular chess ratings, for the currently active 14671 men and 753 women, as given by the FIDE, January 2026. It is argued that even when two or more distributions have close to identical expected values, or medians, even smaller differences in variance may explain gaps for the few very best ones.

2026-02-04T09:22:40Z 9 pages, 7 figures Nils Lid Hjort http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04164v1 2026-02-04T02:57:40Z

This study aims to explore the dynamics of driver attention to various zones, including the road, the central mirror, the embedded Human-Machine Interface (HMI), and the speedometer, across different driving modes in AVs. The integration of autonomous vehicles (AVs) into transportation systems has introduced critical safety concerns, particularly regarding driver re-engagement during mode transitions. Past accidents underscore the risks of overreliance on automation and highlight the need to understand dynamic attention allocation to support safety in autonomous driving. A high-fidelity driving simulation was conducted. Eye-tracking technology was used to measure fixation duration, fixation count, and time to first fixation across distinct driving modes (automated, manual, and transition), which were then used to assess how drivers allocated attention to various areas of interest (AOIs). Findings show that drivers' attention varies significantly across driving modes. In manual mode, attention consistently focuses on the road, while in automated mode, prolonged fixation on the embedded HMI was observed. During the handover and takeover phases, attention shifts dynamically between environmental and technological elements. The study reveals that driver attention allocation is mode-dependent. These findings inform the design of adaptive HMIs in AVs that align with drivers' attention patterns. By presenting relevant information according to the driving context, such systems can enhance driver-vehicle interaction, support effective transitions, and improve overall safety. Systematic analysis of visual attention dynamics across driving modes is gaining prominence, as it informs adaptive HMI designs and driver readiness interventions. The GLMM findings can be directly applied to the design of adaptive HMIs or driver training programs to enhance attention and improve safety.

2026-02-04T02:57:40Z Yuan Cai Mustafa Demir Farzan Sasangohar Mohsen Zare http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08395v2 2026-02-03T14:59:43Z

Network interference occurs when treatments assigned to some units affect the outcomes of others. Traditional approaches often assume that the observed network correctly specifies the interference structure. However, in practice, researchers frequently only have access to proxy measurements of the interference network due to limitations in data collection or potential mismatches between measured networks and actual interference pathways. In this paper, we introduce a framework for estimating causal effects when only proxy networks are available. Our approach leverages a structural causal model that accommodates diverse proxy types, including noisy measurements, multiple data sources, and multilayer networks, and defines causal effects as interventions on population-level treatments. The latent nature of the true interference network poses significant challenges. To overcome them, we develop a Bayesian inference framework. We propose a Block Gibbs sampler with Locally Informed Proposals to update the latent network, thereby efficiently exploring the high-dimensional posterior space composed of both discrete and continuous parameters. The latent network updates are driven by information from the proxy networks, treatments, and outcomes. We illustrate the performance of our method through numerical experiments, demonstrating its accuracy in recovering causal effects even when only proxies of the interference network are available.

2025-05-13T09:46:30Z Bar Weinstein Daniel Nevo http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03274v1 2026-02-03T08:58:23Z

In Calgary, November 2005, Chad Hedrick was the first to skate the 5,000 m below 6:10. His world record time 6:09.68 was then beaten a week later, in Salt Lake City, by Sven Kramer's 6:08.78. Further top races and world records followed over the ensuing seasons; up to and including the 2024-2025 season, a total of 126 races have been below 6:10, with Nils van der Poel's 2021 world record being 6:01.56. The appropriately hyped-up canonical question for the friends and followers and aficionados of speedskating has then been when (and by whom we for the first time would witness a below 6:00.00 race. In this note I first use extreme value statistics modelling to assess the state of affairs, as per the end of the 2024-2025 season, with predictions and probabilities for the 2025-2026 season. Under natural modelling assumptions the probability of seeing a new world record during this new season is shown to be about ten percent. We were indeed excited but in reality merely modestly surprised that a race better than van der Poel's record was clocked, by Timothy Loubineaud, in Salt Lake City, November 14, 2025. But Six-Minute Man Sander Eitrem's outstanding 5:58.52 in Inzell, on January 24, 2026, is truly beamonesquely shocking. I also use the modelling machinery to analyse the post-Eitrem situation, and suggest answers to the question of how fast the 5,000 m ever can be skated.

2026-02-03T08:58:23Z Nils Lid Hjort http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02874v1 2026-02-02T22:30:18Z

Teaching data science presents unique challenges and opportunities that cannot be fully addressed by simply borrowing pedagogical strategies from its parent disciplines of statistics and computer science. Here, we present ten simple rules for teaching data science, developed and refined by leading educators in the community and successfully applied in our own data science classrooms.

2026-02-02T22:30:18Z Tiffany A. Timbers Mine Çetinkaya-Rundel http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20941v3 2026-02-02T12:32:40Z

While split conformal prediction guarantees marginal coverage, approaching the stronger property of conditional coverage is essential for reliable uncertainty quantification. Naive conformal scores, however, suffer from poor conditional coverage in heteroskedastic settings. In univariate regression, this is commonly addressed by normalizing nonconformity scores using estimated local score variance. In this work, we propose a natural extension of this normalization to the multivariate setting, effectively whitening the residuals to decouple output correlations and standardize local variance. We demonstrate that using the Mahalanobis distance induced by a learned local covariance as a nonconformity score provides a closed-form, computationally efficient mechanism for capturing inter-output correlations and heteroskedasticity, avoiding the expensive sampling required by previous methods based on cumulative distribution functions. This structure unlocks several practical extensions, including the handling of missing output values, the refinement of conformal sets when partial information is revealed, and the construction of valid conformal sets for transformations of the output. Finally, we provide extensive empirical evidence on both synthetic and real-world datasets showing that our approach yields conformal sets that significantly improve upon the conditional coverage of existing multivariate baselines.

2025-07-28T15:55:29Z Sacha Braun Eugène Berta Michael I. Jordan Francis Bach http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.23171v1 2026-01-30T16:56:34Z

This article includes a discussion of the ``lost submarine problem", following Morey \emph{et al} (2016). As the title of that paper suggests (\emph{The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals}), the example is intended to illustrate the futility of relying on the confidence interval as a formal inference statement. In the view of this author, the misgivings expressed in Morey \emph{et al} (2016) can be resolved using a decision theoretic approach. While it is true that a variety of statistical methods lead to a variety of confidence intervals, once we precisely define their purpose, a single optimal choice emerges. Furthermore, distinct purposes lead to distinct optimal choices. Therefore, that a variety of procedures exist is an advantage rather than a liability.

2026-01-30T16:56:34Z 2 figures, 11 pages Anthony Almudevar http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20405v1 2026-01-28T09:09:50Z

Pearl's causal hierarchy has garnered sustained attention as a foundational lens for formulating and understanding causal questions, and has been extensively discussed within the framework of structural causal models. In this paper, we revisit the hierarchy from a potential outcomes perspective and provide a formal, systematic classification of how various causal estimands are mapped to specific layers. Building on this classification, we summarize key identifiability challenges for estimands at different layers and review general strategies for achieving identification under varying assumptions. Our perspective is both intuitive and theoretically grounded, as higher layers of the hierarchy correspond to progressively richer features of the potential outcomes distribution, which in turn require stronger assumptions for identification. We expect this perspective to help clarify and deepen understanding of various causal estimands, particularly those in the third layer of the causal hierarchy, along with their associated identifiability challenges, identifiability strategies, and application scenarios.

2026-01-28T09:09:50Z Peng Wu Linbo Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19814v1 2026-01-27T17:15:54Z

Intricate interactions among firms, institutions, and spatial structures shape urban economic systems. In this study, we propose a framework based on three structural dimensions -- abundance, diversity, and longevity (ADL) of economic units -- as proxies of urban economic complexity and resilience. Using a decade of georeferenced firm-level data from Mexico City, we analyze the relationships among ADL variables using regression, spatial correlation, and time-series clustering. Our results reveal nonlinear dynamics across urban space, with powerlaw behavior in central zones and logarithmic saturation in peripheral areas, suggesting differentiated growth regimes. Notably, firm longevity modulates the relationship between abundance and diversity, particularly in periurban transition zones. These spatial patterns point to an emerging polycentric restructuring within a traditionally monocentric metropolis. By integrating economic complexity theory with spatial analysis, our approach provides a scalable method to assess the adaptive capacity of urban economies. This has implications for understanding informality, designing inclusive urban policies, and navigating structural transitions in rapidly urbanizing regions.

2026-01-27T17:15:54Z Marco A. Rosas Pulido Roberto Murcio Omar R. Vázquez Carlos Gershenson http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15467v1 2026-01-21T21:05:50Z

Two broad positions within statistics define a treatment effect, on the one hand, as a parameter of a statistical model, and on the other, as an appropriate population-level difference in outcomes or counterfactual outcomes under the different treatment regimes. This short expository paper presents some simple but consequential insights on the two formulations, contrasting the answers under the most favourable fictitious idealisation for the counterfactual framework. These observations clarify the relationship between Fisherian model-based inference and modern counterfactual formulations, and emphasise concerns, raised by Cox and others, regarding the suitability of model-free definitions as targets of inference when scientific conclusions are intended to generalise beyond the observed sample. Parts of the paper are necessarily controversial; we follow Cox (1958a) in not putting these forward in any dogmatic spirit.

2026-01-21T21:05:50Z Presented at the Nordic-Baltic Biometrics Conference (Oslo, June 2025), and the RSS International Conference (Edinburgh, September 2025) Heather Battey Charlotte Edgar http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18939v3 2026-01-21T15:01:53Z

Factor Analysis has traditionally been utilized across diverse disciplines to extrapolate latent traits that influence the behavior of multivariate observed variables. Historically, the focus has been on analyzing data from a single study, neglecting the potential study-specific variations present in data from multiple studies. Multi-study factor analysis has emerged as a recent methodological advancement that addresses this gap by distinguishing between latent traits shared across studies and study-specific components arising from artifactual or population-specific sources of variation. In this paper, we extend the current methodologies by introducing novel shrinkage priors for the latent factors, thereby accommodating a broader spectrum of scenarios -- from the absence of study-specific latent factors to models in which factors pertain only to small subgroups nested within or shared between the studies. For the proposed construction we provide conditions for identifiability of factor loadings and guidelines to perform straightforward posterior computation via Gibbs sampling. Through comprehensive simulation studies, we demonstrate that our proposed method exhibits competing performance across a variety of scenarios compared to existing methods, yet providing richer insights. The practical benefits of our approach are further illustrated through applications to bird species co-occurrence data and ovarian cancer gene expression data.

2024-10-24T17:25:32Z 35 pages, 8 figures Elena Bortolato Antonio Canale http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06934v2 2026-01-21T13:38:42Z

Can classical game-theoretic frameworks be extended to capture the bounded rationality and causal reasoning of AI agents? We investigate this question by extending Causal Normal Form Games (CNFGs) to sequential settings, introducing Sequential Causal Multi-Agent Systems (S-CMAS) that incorporate Pearl's Causal Hierarchy across leader-follower interactions. While theoretically elegant -- we prove PSPACE-completeness, develop equilibrium refinements, and establish connections to signaling theory -- our comprehensive empirical investigation reveals a critical limitation: S-CNE provides zero welfare improvement over classical Stackelberg equilibrium across all tested scenarios. Through 50+ Monte Carlo simulations and hand-crafted synthetic examples, we demonstrate that backward induction with rational best-response eliminates any strategic advantage from causal layer distinctions. We construct a theoretical example illustrating conditions where benefits could emerge ($ε$-rational satisficing followers), though implementation confirms that even relaxed rationality assumptions prove insufficient when good instincts align with optimal play. This negative result provides valuable insight: classical game-theoretic extensions grounded in rational choice are fundamentally incompatible with causal reasoning advantages, motivating new theoretical frameworks beyond standard Nash equilibrium for agentic AI.

2025-11-10T10:31:43Z AAAI 2026 Workshop on Foundations of Agentic Systems Theory Dennis Thumm http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04361v2 2026-01-21T13:29:23Z

Energy markets exhibit complex causal relationships between weather patterns, generation technologies, and price formation, with regime changes occurring continuously rather than at discrete break points. Current approaches model electricity prices without explicit causal interpretation or counterfactual reasoning capabilities. We introduce Augmented Time Series Causal Models (ATSCM) for energy markets, extending counterfactual reasoning frameworks to multivariate temporal data with learned causal structure. Our approach models energy systems through interpretable factors (weather, generation mix, demand patterns), rich grid dynamics, and observable market variables. We integrate neural causal discovery to learn time-varying causal graphs without requiring ground truth DAGs. Applied to real-world electricity price data, ATSCM enables novel counterfactual queries such as "What would prices be under different renewable generation scenarios?".

2025-11-06T13:45:15Z EurIPS 2025 Workshop Causality for Impact: Practical challenges for real-world applications of causal methods Dennis Thumm