https://arxiv.org/api/tLW4OONzWgkQ6S7YkPrmvuJSnDM 2026-06-14T04:30:13Z 78354 240 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15093v2 Fast spectral separation method for kinetic equation with anisotropic non-stationary collision operator retaining micro-model fidelity 2026-06-05T16:47:05Z We present a generalized, data-driven collisional operator for one-component plasmas, learned from molecular dynamics simulations, to extend the collisional kinetic model beyond the weakly coupled regime. The proposed operator features an anisotropic, non-stationary collision kernel that accounts for particle correlations typically neglected in classical Landau formulations. To enable efficient numerical evaluation, we develop a fast spectral separation method that represents the kernel as a low-rank tensor product of univariate basis functions. This formulation admits an $O(N \log N)$ algorithm via fast Fourier transforms and preserves key physical properties, including discrete conservation laws and the H-theorem, through a structure-preserving central difference discretization. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed model accurately captures plasma dynamics in the moderately coupled regime beyond the standard Landau model while maintaining high computational efficiency and structure-preserving properties. 2025-10-16T19:27:03Z Yue Zhao Huan Lei http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02141v5 Robustly estimating heterogeneity in factorial data using Rashomon Partitions 2026-06-05T15:48:04Z In both observational data and randomized control trials, researchers select statistical models to articulate how the outcome of interest varies with combinations of observable covariates. Choosing a model that is too simple can obfuscate important heterogeneity in outcomes between covariate groups, while too much complexity risks identifying spurious patterns. In this paper, we propose a novel Bayesian framework for model uncertainty called Rashomon Partition Sets (RPSs). The RPS consists of all models that have posterior density close to the maximum a posteriori (MAP) model. We construct the RPS by enumeration, rather than sampling, which ensures that we explore all models with high evidence in the data, even if they offer dramatically different substantive explanations. We use a l0 prior, which allows the allows us to capture complex heterogeneity without imposing strong assumptions about the associations between effects, showing this prior is minimax optimal from an information-theoretic perspective. We characterize the approximation error of (functions of) parameters computed conditional on being in the RPS relative to the entire posterior. We propose an algorithm to enumerate the RPS from the class of models that are interpretable and unique, then provide bounds on the size of the RPS. We give simulation evidence along with three empirical examples: price effects on charitable giving, heterogeneity in chromosomal structure, and the introduction of microfinance. 2024-04-02T17:53:28Z Aparajithan Venkateswaran Anirudh Sankar Arun G. Chandrasekhar Tyler H. McCormick http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07399v1 Automatic, Debiased, and Invariant Counterfactual Generation under General Interventions 2026-06-05T15:40:59Z Generative models for counterfactual outcomes have great potential to support decision-making under complex interventions, but existing approaches are limited by unstable estimation, poor generalization across environments, and bias from nuisance model misspecification. We introduce ADIGen, a framework for automatic, debiased, and invariant counterfactual generation under general interventions, including high-dimensional interventions and outcomes. ADIGen combines Riesz regression to avoid unstable density-ratio estimation, causal invariance to improve generalization under distribution shift, and orthogonal statistical learning to obtain doubly robust guarantees against nuisance model misspecification. We provide excess-risk bounds showing that ADIGen controls counterfactual risk under general interventions, with a product-bias nuisance remainder and an invariant risk bound across environments. 2026-06-05T15:40:59Z Raphael C Kim Jingsen Zhu Ramin Zabih Michele Santacatterina http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07392v1 Online Pandora's Box for Contextual LLM Cascading 2026-06-05T15:29:17Z Motivated by Large Language Model (LLM) cascading, we propose an online contextual Pandora's Box model for adaptively querying and selecting LLM APIs. In each period, a decision-maker observes a request context and faces a two-phase decision problem. In the query phase, the decision-maker sequentially queries APIs, where each query reveals a generated output and the decision-maker incurs an (output-dependent) cost. In the selection phase, the decision-maker selects one of the generated outputs to deploy and observes only the downstream reward of the deployed output. This output-mediated feedback structure differs from classical online contextual Pandora's Box models, in which opening a box directly reveals its reward. Rather than estimating the full conditional output and cost distributions of each API, we directly model the reservation index and develop a learning approach for the query phase. Specifically, we impose a parametric structure on the contextual reservation index functions induced by the classical Weitzman's policy. Our policy combines generalized method of moments (GMM) type estimation of these reservation indices with UCB-style confidence bounds for both these indices and the shared output-level reward evaluator. Under regularity conditions, we prove that the resulting policy achieves dimension-dependent $\widetilde O(\sqrt T)$ cumulative regret over a horizon of $T$ periods. 2026-06-05T15:29:17Z Alexandre Belloni Yan Chen Yehua Wei http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07382v1 Covariance Shrinkage via Stochastic Interpolation 2026-06-05T15:21:27Z We recast classical shrinkage of high-dimensional covariance estimators as empirical risk minimization over a parametric stochastic interpolant between a source and a target distribution. This formalism recovers known shrinkage estimators as special cases and reveals three distinct mechanisms for reducing statistical risk: (i) Scheduling: the interpolant schedule determines the class of admissible covariances, and hence the achievable risk. (ii) Flow maps and couplings: whereas naive constructions amount to assuming independence between the distributions, specific coupling structures (e.g., solutions of optimal transport problems) can lower the empirical risk. Moreover, non-linear flow maps realizing such couplings free the interpolant covariance from the eigenbasis of the empirical estimate, enabling eigenvector regularization. (iii) Early stopping: estimators defined by integrating a regressed vector field afford an additional bias-variance trade-off through approximation of the true interpolant distribution. We then propose a neural estimator of the interpolant, together with an upper bound on its quadratic risk in terms of the interpolant approximation error, and validate both on synthetic experiments. Finally, we apply the estimator to real neuroimaging data, demonstrating the additional regularization power this approach offers in practice. 2026-06-05T15:21:27Z 18 pages Mathieu Chalvidal Florentin Coeurdoux Eric Vanden-Eijnden http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04109v2 Testing Full Mediation of Treatment Effects and the Identifiability of Causal Mechanisms 2026-06-05T14:01:18Z In causal analysis, understanding the causal mechanisms through which an intervention or treatment affects an outcome is often of central interest. We propose a test to evaluate (i) whether the causal effect of a treatment that is randomly assigned conditional on covariates is fully mediated by, or operates exclusively through, observed intermediate outcomes (referred to as mediators or surrogate outcomes), and (ii) whether the various causal mechanisms operating through different mediators are identifiable conditional on covariates. We demonstrate that if both full mediation and identification of causal mechanisms hold, then the conditionally random treatment is conditionally independent of the outcome given the mediators and covariates. Furthermore, we extend our framework to settings with non-randomly assigned treatments. We show that, in this case, full mediation remains testable, while identification of causal mechanisms is no longer guaranteed. We propose a double machine learning framework for implementing the test that can incorporate high-dimensional covariates and is root-n consistent and asymptotically normal under specific regularity conditions. We also present a simulation study demonstrating good finite-sample performance of our method, along with two empirical applications revisiting randomized experiments on maternal mental health and social norms. 2026-03-04T14:29:57Z Martin Huber Kevin Kloiber Lukáš Lafférs http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08598v2 Characterizing Learning Dynamics under Relative Reparameterization of Singular Models 2026-06-05T13:18:01Z A common way to analyze learning of statistical models is to consider operations in the models parameter space, however this becomes challenging when there is no one-to-one mapping between the parameter space and the underlying statistical model space. Such ``singular models'' occur frequently and exhibit a characteristic decrease in convergence speed of learning trajectories due to attractor behaviors. In this work, we consider a relative reparameterization technique of the parameter space, which yields a general method for extracting regular sub-models from singular models. On the example of Gaussian Mixture Models and Neural Networks we theoretically and numerically analyze the convergence rate for Gradient Descent under both parameterizations. Analyzing second-order methods and explicit properties of the Fisher Information Matrix we distinguish between differences in convergence behavior arising from algorithmic and intrinsic information-geometric aspects. 2022-06-17T07:50:22Z Pascal Mattia Esser Frank Nielsen http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11208v3 Predictable Compression Failures: Order Sensitivity and Information Budgeting for Evidence-Grounded Binary Adjudication 2026-06-05T12:26:10Z Transformers used for evidence-grounded binary adjudication (e.g., support/refute, yes/no, or verifier-backed pass/fail decisions) can be sensitive to the order in which exchangeable evidence is presented, producing dispersion across permutations and unreliable attempted answers under a verifier-relative Bernoulli predicate. We treat evidence order as a nuisance variable and formalize an expectation-realization gap: next-token training can minimize expected conditional description length over orderings while a fixed ordering remains position-sensitive. Our Quantified Martingale Violation (QMV) bound predicts the dispersion induced by adjacent-rank positional sensitivity, with $O(\log n)$ growth in the harmonic regime; our Expectation-level Decompression Law (EDFL) specializes a KL convexity/data-processing bound to Bernoulli predicates, yielding Bits-to-Trust (B2T), Risk-of-Hallucination (RoH), and an Information Sufficiency Ratio (ISR) gate for answer/abstain decisions. On 3,059 grounded items from FEVER, HotpotQA, NQ-Open, PopQA, and Controls, we observe logarithmic dispersion and positive Jensen gains from uniform permutation mixtures. In one pre-specified held-out audit (528 items), the analytically fixed ISR$=1$ gate attains 0.0-0.7% hallucination with 20.6-27.9% abstention (95% CIs), supporting the operating point without claiming universal calibration across all model families or unrestricted generation. 2025-09-14T10:32:59Z Leon Chlon Ahmed Karim Maggie Chlon MarcAntonio Awada http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07213v1 Principal Component Analysis for Multivariate Extremes 2026-06-05T12:25:56Z This chapter explores ways to reduce the dimensionality of the data while preserving key information relevant to the analysis of multivariate extreme values. 2026-06-05T12:25:56Z Chapter 11 in "Handbook of of Statistic of Extremes", edited by Miguel de Carvalho, Raphaël Huser, Philippe Naveau, and Brian Reich Dan Cooley Anne Sabourin Troy Wixson http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03559v2 Analytical Evaluation of DCA Convergence Properties for Minimizing Prediction Functions of Gaussian RBF Support Vector Regression 2026-06-05T10:28:04Z For nonconvex optimization problems whose objective is the prediction function of a trained Support Vector Regression (SVR) model with the Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) kernel (RBF-SVR), we present a framework that applies the difference of convex functions (DC) algorithm (DCA) by exploiting the analytical structure of the RBF kernel to construct an explicit DC decomposition. Specifically, we derive in closed form both the lower bound $μ$ of the strong convexity parameter of the DC components and the upper bound $L$ of the gradient Lipschitz constant of the subproblem. Both $μ$ and $L$ are determined solely by the post-training dual-coefficient sum $C_α$ and the RBF kernel parameter $γ$, together with the DC decomposition parameter $ρ$, and they share a common leading term $C_αρ$. Through numerical experiments on six benchmark functions, we show that $C_αρ$ is the primary single quantity characterizing both the convergence properties and the initial-point dependence of DCA, and further demonstrate that it decomposes into two independent pathways, $C \to C_α$ and $γ\to ρ$, with its primary variation governed by the SVR hyperparameters $(C, γ)$. Together, these results allow the convergence properties of DCA on RBF-SVR to be assessed in advance through the single scalar quantity $C_αρ$: approximately from $(C, γ)$ before training, and exactly in closed form after training. 2026-06-02T12:25:21Z 29 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables Yohei Kakimoto Yuto Omae Hirotaka Takahashi http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07124v1 Information-Theoretic Bounds for Sparse Covariance Estimation in the Vertical-Split Distributed Model 2026-06-05T10:25:12Z We study the minimax estimation error for distributed covariance matrix estimation in the vertical-split (feature-split) setting, where two agents each observe different coordinates of $m$ i.i.d. sub-Gaussian samples and communicate a limited number of bits to a central server. While Rahmani et al. [2025] established nearly tight bounds for dense (unstructured) cross-covariance matrices, we investigate whether imposing elementwise $s$-sparsity on the cross-covariance $C_{21}$ can reduce the required communication and sample complexity. In contrast to the horizontal-split setting, where Braverman et al. [2016] showed that sparsity does not reduce communication cost for mean estimation, we prove that sparsity does help for cross-covariance estimation in the vertical split. Specifically, we establish minimax lower bounds showing that the communication budget per agent scales as $B_k = Ω(σ^4 d_k\, s' \log(d_1 d_2/s')/\varepsilon^2)$ and the sample complexity for cross-covariance estimation as $m = Ω(σ^4\, s' \log(d_1 d_2/s')/\varepsilon^2)$, where $s' = s \wedge d_{\min}$. For the $1$-sparse case, this yields an exponential improvement from $d_1 d_2$ to $\log(d_1 d_2)$ compared to the dense rate. Our lower bounds are established via Fano's method with an explicit sparse packing using a Varshamov--Gilbert-type argument for signed partial permutation matrices combined with the Conditional Strong Data Processing Inequality of Rahmani et al. [2025]. We show the bounds are tight with a matching achievable scheme, based on covering-net quantization and entry-wise hard thresholding, that attains the $s$-sparse lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors. 2026-06-05T10:25:12Z Jing Yee Tan Guangyue Han http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02819v5 Causal Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks 2026-06-05T09:47:39Z Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) aim to distinguish training points (members) from unseen data (non-members), and are widely used to quantify memorization and assess privacy risks. Standard MIA evaluation requires repeated retraining, which is computationally costly for large models. One-run (single training with randomized data inclusion) and zero-run (post hoc evaluation) methods are often used instead, but their statistical validity remains unclear. We address this gap by framing MIA evaluation as a causal inference problem, defining \emph{memorization as the causal effect of including a data point in the training set}. This novel formulation reveals and formalizes key sources of bias in existing protocols: one-run methods suffer from interference between jointly included points, while zero-run evaluations are additionally confounded by distribution shift between member and non-member evaluation data. We derive causal analogues of standard MIA metrics and propose practical estimators for multi-run, one-run, and zero-run regimes with non-asymptotic consistency guarantees. We validate our approach in several settings, including pretrained and fine-tuned LLMs, showing that it enables reliable measurement of MIA performance without retraining and under distribution shift. Overall, our framework provides a principled foundation for privacy evaluation in modern AI systems. 2026-02-02T21:17:28Z Fixed ref label problems Mathieu Even Clément Berenfeld Linus Bleistein Tudor Cebere Julie Josse Aurélien Bellet http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21423v3 Conflicting Biases at the Edge of Stability: Norm versus Sharpness Regularization 2026-06-05T09:42:35Z The remarkable generalization properties of overparameterized networks are often attributed to implicit biases, such as norm minimization at small learning rates and low sharpness in the Edge-of-Stability regime. In this work, we argue that a comprehensive understanding of the generalization performance of gradient descent requires analyzing the interaction between these various forms of implicit regularization. We empirically demonstrate that the learning rate interpolates between low parameter norm and low sharpness of the trained model. We furthermore prove that neither implicit bias alone minimizes the generalization error for diagonal linear networks trained on a simple regression task. These findings demonstrate that focusing on a single implicit bias is insufficient to explain good generalization, and they motivate a broader view of implicit regularization that captures the dynamic trade-off between norm and sharpness induced by non-negligible learning rates. 2025-05-27T16:51:06Z Accepted at ICML 2026 Maria Matveev Vit Fojtik Hung-Hsu Chou Gitta Kutyniok Johannes Maly http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07058v1 Constructing VAE Latent Spaces with Prescribed Topology 2026-06-05T08:59:55Z Variational autoencoders (VAEs) learn low-dimensional latent representations of high-dimensional data. When the data lies on a manifold with non-Euclidean topology, the standard Gaussian prior introduces a topological mismatch that degrades reconstruction quality and prevents faithful representation. We present a constructive mathematical framework that resolves this mismatch for all manifolds that admit a product covering space. These are manifolds expressible as products of elementary factors (circles, intervals, or lines) or as quotients of such products by a finite symmetry group. The class includes cylinders, tori, Möbius strips, Klein bottles, and real projective spaces. Factorized distributions over the elementary factors yield product topologies with closed-form, decoupled KL divergences, so that each latent factor can be shaped independently while keeping training tractable. We catalogue reparametrizable encoder-prior pairs for periodic, bounded, and unbounded supports, and provide coordinate transformations that allow standard neural networks to output non-Euclidean parameters with smooth gradients. For quotient manifolds, the decoder receives group-invariant features of the covering-space coordinates, so that identified points produce identical outputs. Anchor constraints fix the coordinate system relative to the data or create soft topological holes. Experiments on synthetic manifolds and real-image datasets (rotated and cyclically shifted MNIST) confirm that a topology-matched prior aligns KL regularization with the data manifold. The resulting topology-aware models outperform the Gaussian baseline at all practically relevant regularization strengths. The code is available at https://github.com/JvHulst/VAE-Topology. 2026-06-05T08:59:55Z 16 pages, 7 figures Jilles S. van Hulst Jakub M. Tomczak W. P. M. H. Heemels Duarte J. Antunes http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21285v5 Learnable Kernel Density Estimation for Graphs and Its Application to Graph-Level Anomaly Detection 2026-06-05T08:55:58Z This work proposes a framework LGKDE that learns kernel density estimation for graphs. The key challenge in graph density estimation lies in effectively capturing both structural patterns and semantic variations while maintaining theoretical guarantees. Combining graph kernels and kernel density estimation (KDE) is a standard approach to graph density estimation, but has unsatisfactory performance due to the handcrafted and fixed features of kernels. Our method LGKDE leverages graph neural networks to represent each graph as a discrete distribution and utilizes maximum mean discrepancy to learn the graph metric for multi-scale KDE, where all parameters are learned by maximizing the density of graphs relative to the density of their well-designed perturbed counterparts. The perturbations are conducted on both node features and graph spectra, which helps better characterize the boundary of normal density regions. Theoretically, we establish consistency and convergence guarantees for LGKDE, including bounds on the mean integrated squared error, robustness, and generalization. We validate LGKDE by demonstrating its effectiveness in recovering the underlying density of synthetic graph distributions and applying it to graph anomaly detection across diverse benchmark datasets. Extensive empirical evaluation shows that LGKDE demonstrates superior performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines on most benchmark datasets. 2025-05-27T14:53:09Z Accepted in the Forty-Third International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2026), Main Track Xudong Wang Ziheng Sun Chris Ding Jicong Fan