https://arxiv.org/api/bNkt1OfQPPW7k3Xzw2ATg5r64KA2026-11-12T03:27:32Z81787015http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14516v1TorchCurves: Differentiable Parametric Curves2026-11-10T18:58:52ZWe present TorchCurves, a PyTorch library that treats vector-valued parametric curves as learnable primitives. Its central operation maps batches of scalar inputs to points on curves represented in B-spline or Legendre polynomial bases, with differentiation through both inputs and coefficients. Curve coefficients can be optimized jointly with the surrounding model or produced by another network. The library provides trainable modules, reusable basis modules, and a functional interface, supporting applications ranging from continuous feature embeddings to Kolmogorov-Arnold networks and functional regression. Its implementation combines classical evaluation algorithms with vectorized PyTorch operations, emphasizing readability and maintainability without custom hardware kernels. Timing experiments compare curve evaluation against NumPy and SciPy and KAN training against EfficientKAN across a range of problem sizes. The results illustrate where this generality remains computationally practical and where overhead is substantial. Library is available on GitHub at https://github.com/alexshtf/torchcurves.2026-11-10T18:58:52ZSoftware paper for a library I've been working on for more than a yearAlex Shtoffhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22010v2Uniform-in-Time Weak Propagation-of-Chaos in Shallow Neural Networks2026-11-10T18:54:51ZWe consider one-hidden layer neural networks trained in the feature-learning regime using gradient descent, and relate the output of the finite-width network $f_{\hatρ_t^m}$ to its infinite-width counterpart $f_{ρ_t^{MF}}$, which evolves in the mean-field dynamics.
While constant-time horizon bounds for $\|f_{ρ_t^{MF}} - f_{\hatρ_t^m}\|$ may be obtained via standard Grönwall estimates, the long-time behavior of the fluctuation is a more delicate matter. Uniform-in-time bounds often rely on (local) strong convexity in the landscape or Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities present in noisy gradient dynamics.
In this work, we establish non-asymptotic weak propagation-of-chaos that holds uniformly in time, obtained by exploiting instead the convergence rate of the mean-field deterministic Wasserstein-gradient-flow dynamics. Specifically, denoting by $L_t$ the mean-field excess MSE loss at time $t$ and $m$ the number of neurons, under standard regularity assumptions and the condition $\int_0^\infty L_t^{1/2} dt =O(\log d)$, we obtain the uniform in time bound $\|f_{ρ_t^{MF}}- f_{\hatρ_t^m}\|^2 \lesssim \text{poly}(d) m^{-\min(1,c/6)}$ whenever $L_t \lesssim t^{-c}$. Our result holds in a noiseless setting and does not make any assumptions on the geometry of the landscape near the optimum, and extends seamlessly to other forms of discretization, including finite number of samples and time discretization. A key takeaway of our result is that whenever the convergence rate of the mean-field, population-loss dynamics is faster than $t^{-2}$, we can attain a loss of $ε$ with only $\text{poly}(d/ε)$ neurons, training samples, and GD steps.2026-05-21T05:14:19Z52 pagesMargalit GlasgowJoan Brunahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14467v1A Theory of Policy Optimization in Post-Training: Coverage Collapse and Reference Resets2026-11-10T18:31:36ZPolicy optimization is central to language model post-training, yet principled guidance remains limited. We revisit its theoretical foundations to identify algorithms that learn near-optimal policies using total samples and gradient steps governed by the base model's response coverage, a measure of how readily it generates optimal responses. We call such algorithms coverage-preserving. This guarantee captures the goal of amplifying capabilities accessible through sampling from the base model.
(1) Coverage collapse. REINFORCE, the basis for PPO and GRPO, can drive the probability of optimal responses to near zero, even as reward improves. This coverage collapse stalls optimization, and convergence can require exponentially many steps despite good initial coverage. The failure arises even with exact gradients and persists under KL regularization to the base model.
(2) Reference resets. We show that repeatedly resetting the KL reference to the most recent policy mitigates coverage collapse. We formalize this intervention in Approximate Policy Mirror Descent (APMD), a meta-algorithm that approximately solves a sequence of KL-regularized RL subproblems. APMD enables stronger regularization, making each subproblem easier to solve, while reference resets allow convergence to global optimality.
(3) Coverage-preserving algorithms. For softmax linear policies over pretrained features, we use APMD to establish the first global convergence guarantees showing that widely used families of post-training algorithms are coverage-preserving. These include stylized PPO and GRPO variants with explicit KL regularization and reference resets, and squared-loss algorithms that implement them implicitly, including those used to train the Kimi models.
These results clarify how regularization, clipping, and objective choice affect the sampling and optimization costs of post-training.2026-11-10T18:31:36Z141 pages including appendices, 3 figuresAudrey HuangNan JiangSham M. KakadeSadhika MalladiAkshay KrishnamurthyDylan J. Fosterhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14465v1One Curve, Different Weights: AUC, the Brier Score, Decision-Weighted AUC, and the Policy Youden Index2026-11-10T18:29:50ZAUC and the Brier score are standard summaries of a binary risk score, yet they can rank models differently. We introduce a weighted AUC, AUC$_π$, which weights each pair of observations by how differently a decision maker with probability of acting $π$ treats them. We show that all three are built on weighted averages of one curve, the Youden index $J(t) = \mathrm{TPR}(t) - \mathrm{FPR}(t)$ across cutoffs $t$, and that the averages differ in the weights they put on the cutoffs. Each weights a cutoff by how much something rises across it: for AUC, the distribution of all scores; for the Brier score, the true probability $\mathbb{E}[Y \mid S]$; for AUC$_π$, the decision maker's probability of acting. Up to normalization, AUC$_π$ is the Brier skill score of the ideal forecast with its weight moved to the cutoffs the decision maker cares about. We also show that weighting pairs by $|π(s) - π(s')|$ is, up to scale, the only pair weight fixed in advance that makes a pair-weighted AUC an average of the Youden curve for every score distribution. As a ranking measure, AUC weights every model the same way. Hand (2009) shows that it can also be read as an average over cost thresholds, and in that reading each model weights the thresholds differently. The numerator of AUC$_π$, which we call the policy Youden index, is the expected share of class 1 a fixed policy acts on minus the expected share of class 0. It judges every model by the same policy and so avoids this; the full ratio AUC$_π$ does not.2026-11-10T18:29:50Z19 pages, 3 figuresYegor Baranovskihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14463v1A Theory of Cross-Validation Variance2026-11-10T18:29:42ZCross-validation estimates predictive performance by repeatedly splitting the data into training and validation sets, fitting the model on the first and evaluating it on the second. Every observation influences the estimate in two roles, through its own evaluation when it is held out and through the models it helps fit when it trains. The random splits determine its weight in each role. From this representation, we prove an exact finite-sample identity for the variance of the cross-validated estimate. For a given splitting scheme with a common training set size, the variance is a function of these weights, with constants of the model, the metric, and the population. It covers metrics averaged over observations, such as mean squared error, and over case--control pairs, such as the AUC. The identity shows which schemes to use. The variance decomposes into sampling variance, which depends only on the training size, and variance due to the random fold splitting, which arises when the weights change from one draw of the splits to the next. K-fold cross-validation, whose weights are equal across observations by design, is therefore variance optimal at first order; Monte Carlo and bootstrap cross-validation are not. The first-order variance of K-fold does not depend on K, and under reasonable conditions on the model leave-one-out has the smallest variance of any K-fold scheme. For the AUC the same holds for leave-pair-out, which evaluates every case--control pair. Finally, we show the cross-validated estimate is asymptotically normal with the identity's full variance. Together, these results provide a general theoretical foundation for inference on cross-validated performance and establish principles for selecting variance-optimal cross-validation designs.2026-11-10T18:29:42Z27 pages main text, 57 pages supplementary material with 6 sections, 1 figureNathaniel S. O'ConnellJaime L. Speiserhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14445v1Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Mixtures of Logistic Regressions2026-11-10T18:15:33ZMixtures of logistic regressions provide a flexible framework for modeling binary responses, extending standard logistic regression to accommodate unobserved heterogeneity while retaining an interpretable regression structure. In this paper, we study such models with an unspecified mixing distribution. We analyze a sieve nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) and derive nonasymptotic bounds on the estimation error of the resulting mixture regression function under both fixed and random designs. Our results reveal an explicit tradeoff between statistical estimation error and the approximation error induced by the sieve radius, from which we derive convergence rates under several tail conditions on the mixing distribution. For computation, we propose a finite-particle algorithm that approximates the sieve NPMLE by optimizing the locations and weights of a finitely supported mixing distribution. The method offers numerical advantages over existing algorithms and comes with rigorous convergence guarantees. For any fixed dataset, we establish global convergence of the likelihood to the restricted NPMLE value when the number of particles exceeds a finite threshold. When the true mixing distribution is finitely supported, we further establish uniform global convergence guarantees and derive error bounds that separate algorithmic and statistical errors. Our analysis also yields a denoising bound for the mixing distribution and an identifiability result that complements existing results in the literature.2026-11-10T18:15:33Z126 pages, 8 figures. Includes appendicesMuheng LiPeize ZhangXin Binghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22811v6Highly Efficient and Effective LLMs with Multi-Boolean Architectures2026-11-10T17:12:58ZWeight binarization has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce the complexity of large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches fall into post-training binarization, which is simple but causes severe performance loss, and training-aware methods, which depend on full-precision latent weights, adding complexity and limiting efficiency. We propose a novel framework that represents LLMs with multi-kernel Boolean parameters and, for the first time, enables direct finetuning LMMs in the Boolean domain, eliminating the need for latent weights. This enhances representational capacity and dramatically reduces complexity during both finetuning and inference. Extensive experiments across diverse LLMs show our method outperforms recent ultra low-bit quantization and binarization techniques.2025-05-28T19:40:34ZICLR 2026 (Main Conference)Ba-Hien TranVan Minh Nguyenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10566v2Affine Tracing: A New Paradigm for Probabilistic Linear Solvers2026-11-10T17:09:16ZProbabilistic linear solvers (PLSs) return probability distributions that quantify uncertainty due to limited computation in the solution of linear systems. The literature has traditionally distinguished between Bayesian PLSs, which condition a prior on information obtained from projections of the linear system, and probabilistic iterative methods (PIMs), which lift classical iterative solvers to probability space. In this work we show this dichotomy to be false: Bayesian PLSs are a special case of non-stationary affine PIMs. In addition, we prove that any realistic affine PIM is calibrated. These results motivate a focus on (non-stationary) affine PIMs, but their practical adoption has been limited by the significant manual effort required to implement them. To address this, we introduce affine tracing, an algorithmic framework that automatically constructs a PIM from a standard implementation of an affine iterative method by passing symbolic tracers through the computation to build an affine computational graph. We show how this graph can be transformed to compute posterior covariances, and how equality saturation can be used to perform algebraic simplifications required for computation under specific prior choices. We demonstrate the framework by automatically generating a probabilistic multigrid solver and evaluate its performance in the context of Gaussian process approximation.2026-05-11T13:36:53ZAccepted at the 40th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2026)Disha HegdeMarvin PförtnerJon Cockaynehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22432v3LoBoost: Model-Native Local Conformal Prediction for Gradient-Boosted Trees2026-11-10T17:07:42ZGradient-boosted decision trees are among the strongest off-the-shelf predictors for tabular regression, but point predictions alone do not quantify uncertainty. Conformal prediction provides distribution-free marginal coverage, yet standard split conformal uses a single global residual quantile and can adapt poorly to heteroscedasticity. We propose LoBoost, a model-native local conformal method that reuses the fitted ensemble's leaf structure to define a multiscale partition of the feature space. Each input is represented by the sequence of leaves it visits along the boosting path, and matching leaf prefixes define nested groups in which residual quantiles are estimated locally. By reusing the predictive structure already learned by the model, LoBoost requires no auxiliary partition or nuisance model, no retraining, and no additional data split beyond standard conformal calibration. Our theory connects the stability of the fitted ensemble and the geometry of its induced cells to local residual-score homogeneity, providing finite-sample coverage-error control and asymptotic pointwise validity as the local calibration size grows and the cells become sufficiently homogeneous. Experiments show a transparent quality-cost trade-off: LoBoost improves over global split conformal on several heterogeneous datasets, but it is not uniformly superior to the adaptive baselines and is not uniformly Pareto-optimal.2026-02-25T21:44:19ZAccepted paper versionTransactions on Machine Learning Research (11/2026)Vagner SantosVictor CoscratoLuben CabezasRafael IzbickiThiago Ramoshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14328v1Forward-Value Discretization: Faster Stochastic Diffusion Sampling Without High-Order Approximation2026-11-10T16:53:27ZStochastic diffusion samplers often require substantially more neural function evaluations (NFEs) than deterministic samplers to achieve comparable sample quality. Although higher-order discretization accelerates deterministic sampling, its benefits for stochastic sampling remains unclear. We establish matching upper and worst-case lower bounds showing that stochastic samplers with higher-order approximations remain first-order convergent, even with exact score functions. Thus, increasing the approximation order does not generally improve the convergence order. Motivated by this limitation, we introduce forward-value discretization, a training-free framework that evaluates the data/noise prediction model at a lookahead estimate constructed from previous predictions. For deterministic sampling, the resulting Forward DPMSolver (F-DPMSolver), improves sample quality at low NFE budgets through its DDIM-based variant, despite remaining first-order convergent. For stochastic sampling, we develop Forward DDPM (F-DDPM), which evaluates the model at a cleaner lookahead point adjusted for subsequent noise injection. This estimate reuses both the previous model prediction and the previously injected noise. Both variants admit first-order convergence guarantees with one model evaluation per iteration. Across CIFAR-10, ImageNet, FFHQ, and LSUN, F-DDPM consistently achieves lower FID than the evaluated stochastic baselines at matched NFE budgets. With 1.5 times as many NFEs as deterministic baselines, it achieves competitive sample quality, narrowing the practical efficiency gap between stochastic and deterministic sampling. Code is available at https://github.com/Na-Li66/F-DDPM.2026-11-10T16:53:27ZYuchen JiaoNa LiChangxiao CaiYuting WeiGen Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14275v1Compositional random forest2026-11-10T16:18:46ZCompositional data have been analysed in the literature from three main points of view: directly on the simplex, in log-ratio coordinates, and as directional data on the unit sphere. In this paper, we construct a random forest framework for compositional responses that accommodates all three. Random forests are ensembles of decision trees, and the split criterion determines how each tree grows. We use the log-likelihood gain as the split criterion and consider distributions defined on the different spaces in which compositions can be represented. The Dirichlet likelihood has been studied in the literature, but its covariance is fixed by its mean up to a single scalar, and its maximum likelihood estimator has no closed form. To obtain more flexible criteria, we use two well-known transformations. First, the square-root transformation maps compositions onto the unit sphere, where existing directional distributions require numerical estimation. We introduce a tangent-normal (TN) distribution, which shares its parameters with the Kent distribution, and construct a split criterion whose gain is computed from additive sufficient statistics: the shape parameters are maximised out in closed form, up to an exponentially small truncation constant, so that no parameter is estimated iteratively. Second, the log-ratio transformation maps compositions to Euclidean space, where the multivariate logistic-normal distribution has a flexible covariance and a closed-form maximum log-likelihood, also based on additive sufficient statistics. Both criteria respond to a shift of the mean, measured relative to the covariance, and to a change in the covariance itself. In simulations, the most accurate forest depended on the covariance structure of the composition. The TN forest was the most accurate in two of the three designs.2026-11-10T16:18:46ZKhaled MasoumifardStephan van der WesthuizenSugnet Gardner-Lubbehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19510v2Total Variation Distance Estimation in Autoregressive Models2026-11-10T15:40:19ZModern LLM deployments use a number of implementation choices and inference optimizations (e.g., batching, custom kernels, and quantization) on top of fixed weights, so two engines serving "the same model" can produce meaningfully different distributions. We study the problem of estimating the total variation (TV) distance between two length-$n$ autoregressive distributions to additive error $\varepsilon$, under three access models. (1) Under sample access, we use $\widetilde{O}(n^2 K/\varepsilon^2)$ queries, where $K$ is the maximum support of the next-token distribution. This improves upon the $\widetilde{O}(n^3 m/\varepsilon^5)$-query estimator of Meel et al. (2025), where $m \geq K$ is the total size of the token alphabet. (2) Under logit access, we use $O(n/\varepsilon^2)$ queries, and this is tight. (3) Under noisy logit access, we smoothly interpolate between the above two guarantees: if probability values are given to relative error $σ$, we use $\widetilde{O}((n+n^2σ^2)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries. We complement our theoretical results with an empirical evaluation of our algorithms, for example measuring the distance between SGLang and vLLM serving identical weights. Our experiments highlight the robustness and practicality of estimating the total variation distance, which remains estimable where the KL divergence is infinite. Our code is available at https://github.com/XunZhiyang/llm-tv-estimation.2026-07-21T18:49:45ZPreliminary version of this paper is accepted by Neurips 2026. 40 pages, 11 figures, code is available at https://github.com/XunZhiyang/llm-tv-estimationEric PriceKevin TianZhiyang XunYusong Zhuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03007v5Scalable and Calibrated Sampling for Bayesian Generalized Linear Mixed Model via Stochastic Gradient Markov Chain Monte Carlo2026-11-10T15:09:10ZGeneralized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are widely used for analyzing correlated data, particularly in large-scale biomedical and social science applications. Scalable Bayesian inference for GLMMs is challenging due to an intractable marginal likelihood and a high computational cost incurred by conventional Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. We develop a stochastic gradient MCMC (SGMCMC) algorithm tailored to GLMMs that enables accurate posterior inference in the large-sample regime. Our approach uses Fisher's identity to construct a (biased) Monte Carlo estimator of the gradient of the marginal log-likelihood, making SGMCMC feasible when direct gradient computation is impossible. We analyze the additional variability, introduced by both data subsampling and gradient approximation, to derive a post-hoc covariance correction that yields properly calibrated posterior uncertainty. We show through simulated studies that the proposed method provides accurate posterior means and variances in settings with a large number of groups, outperforming existing approaches, including control variate methods. We further demonstrate the method's practical utility in an analysis of electronic health records data, where accounting for variance inflation materially changes scientific conclusions.2024-03-05T14:35:34Z33 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. To be published in Statistics and ComputingYoungsoo BaekAndrea AgazziFelipe A. MedeirosSamuel I. Berchuckhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05996v2Gaussian mixture models in Hilbert spaces via kernel methods2026-11-10T14:49:36ZModern datasets across many disciplines increasingly consist of time-evolving, potentially infinite-dimensional random objects, such as dynamic functional data, which are naturally modeled in Hilbert spaces. In these settings, characterizing probability measures, for example, through densities, can be ill-defined or technically challenging. Motivated by clustering applications, we propose a Gaussian mixture framework for Hilbert-space-valued data based on kernel mean embeddings and develop efficient optimization algorithms for estimation. We establish theoretical guarantees showing that the proposed algorithm is well-defined and that the model yields a dense class of approximations in infinite-dimensional spaces. We evaluate the framework through extensive experiments on diverse data geometries, including $L^2$-functional data and graph signals arising in modern medical applications.2026-05-07T10:48:17Z39 pages, 14 figuresDaniel López-MonteroAntonio Álvarez-LópezMarcos Matabuenahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09353v3Low-degree lower bounds via almost orthonormal bases2026-11-10T14:49:34ZLow-degree polynomials have emerged as a powerful paradigm for providing evidence of statistical--computational gaps across a variety of high-dimensional statistical models [Wein25]. For detection problems---where the goal is to test a planted distribution $\mathbb{P}'$ against a null distribution $\mathbb{P}$ with independent components---the standard approach is to bound the advantage using an $\mathbb{L}^2(\mathbb{P})$-orthonormal family of polynomials. However, this method breaks down for estimation tasks or more complex testing problems where $\mathbb{P}$ has some planted structures, so that no simple $\mathbb{L}^2(\mathbb{P})$-orthogonal polynomial family is available. To address this challenge, several technical workarounds have been proposed [SW22,SW25], though their implementation can be delicate. In this work, we propose a more direct proof strategy. Focusing on random graph models, we construct a basis of polynomials that is almost orthonormal under $\mathbb{P}$, in precisely those regimes where statistical--computational gaps arise. This almost orthonormal basis not only yields a direct route to establishing low-degree lower bounds, but also allows us to explicitly identify the polynomials that optimize the low-degree criterion. This, in turn, provides insights into the design of optimal polynomial-time algorithms. We illustrate the effectiveness of our approach by recovering known low-degree lower bounds, and establishing new ones for problems such as hidden subcliques, stochastic block models, and seriation models.2025-09-11T11:07:36ZMISTEA - Axe probabilit{é}-statistiqueAlexandra CarpentierLMO, CELESTESimone Maria GiancolaLMO, CELESTEChristophe GiraudLMO, CELESTENicolas VerzelenMISTEA