https://arxiv.org/api/7zmvUm/5ZzC961ExWbQuVNd1+dA 2026-06-10T16:24:44Z 36124 270 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07825v2 2026-06-01T14:26:41Z

Identifiability is the property in mathematical modelling that determines if model parameters can be uniquely estimated from data. For infectious disease models, failure to ensure identifiability can lead to misleading parameter estimates and unreliable policy recommendations. We examine the identifiability of a modified SIR model that accounts for under-reporting and pre-existing immunity in the population. We provide a mathematical proof of the unidentifiability of jointly estimating three parameters: the fraction under-reporting, the proportion of the population with prior immunity, and the community transmission rate, when only reported case data are available. We then show, analytically and with a simulation study, that the identifiability of all three parameters is achieved if the reported incidence is complemented with sample survey data of prior immunity or prevalence during the outbreak. Our results show the limitations of parameter inference in partially observed epidemics and the importance of identifiability analysis when developing and applying models for public health decision making.

2025-06-09T14:49:36Z Fanny Bergström Martina Favero Tom Britton 10.1007/s11538-026-01656-w http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17141v2 2026-06-01T14:20:58Z

Background and Objective: Clinical prediction models are commonly evaluated regarding performance for a population, although decisions are made for individuals. The classic view relates uncertainty in risk estimates for individuals to sample size (estimation uncertainty) while other sources are model uncertainty (variability in modeling choices) and applicability uncertainty (variability in measurement procedures and between populations). We aim to illustrate the uncertainty of prediction models in estimating individual risks with an ovarian cancer example. Methods: We used real and synthetic data for ovarian cancer diagnosis to train 59400 models with variations in estimation, model, and applicability uncertainty. We then used these models to estimate the probability of ovarian cancer in a fixed test set of 100 patients and evaluate the variability in individual estimates. Results: We show empirically that estimation uncertainty can be strongly dominated by model uncertainty and applicability uncertainty, even for models that perform well at the population level. Estimation uncertainty decreased considerably with increasing training sample size, whereas model and applicability uncertainty remained large. Conclusion: Individual risk estimates are far more uncertain than often assumed. Model uncertainty and applicability uncertainty usually remain invisible when prediction models or algorithms are based on a single study. Predictive algorithms should inform, not dictate, care and support personalization through clinician-patient interaction.

2025-06-20T16:43:01Z 9 pages, 2 tables, 2 figures Lasai Barreñada Ewout W Steyerberg Dirk Timmerman Doranne Thomassen Laure Wynants Ben Van Calster http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09919v2 2026-06-01T13:59:04Z

Adaptive enrichment trials aim to identify and recruit participants most likely to benefit from treatment based on evolving biomarker evidence, with the goal of informing individualized treatment recommendations. Bayesian methods are well suited to these designs because they allow external information to be incorporated in a principled manner. In practice, prior studies often provide only summary-level information, with subgroup-specific estimates unavailable due to design or privacy constraints. Existing dynamic borrowing approaches therefore rely on aggregate measures, such as the average treatment effect, and implicitly assume that historical information maps directly onto model parameters. In adaptive enrichment settings aimed at identifying individualized treatment effects, however, subgroup-specific treatment parameters are not identifiable when only marginal historical effects are available. To address this gap, we propose a Bayesian adaptive enrichment design that borrows information from external studies using a normalized power prior anchored on one or more summary measures, such as the average treatment effect. { To our knowledge, no existing method addresses this gap.} Interim analyses use posterior probabilities to guide early stopping for efficacy or futility, or to continue recruitment within promising biomarker-defined subgroups. Simulation studies evaluate operating characteristics across historical bias, sample size, and prior informativeness. Together with a motivating future trial in obstructive sleep apnea, the results show efficiency gains versus non-borrowing designs, including improved power, earlier stopping, and reduced expected sample size.

2026-03-10T17:16:20Z 13 pages, 4 tables, 0 figures Lara Maleyeff Shirin Golchi Erica E. M. Moodie http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02676v1 2026-06-01T13:45:16Z

Visual and quantitative goodness-of-fit diagnostics are an important tool in the practitioner's toolbox. The need for convincing and reliable diagnostics is particularly clear when fitting extreme value regression models, which are used for extrapolation far beyond the observable range of the response variable, and often evaluated at unobserved covariate values. Despite this, few diagnostics have been developed for extreme value regression models, and those available often suffer in terms of interpretability or scalability on low-dimensional or non-Euclidean covariate domains, often encountered in modern applications. Moreover, existing methods tend to offer a global perspective on model fit; that is, they quantify goodness-of-fit across the entire dataset, without offering insight into regions of the covariate space where the model fit may be poor. We propose two novel visual diagnostics for extreme value regression models: the standardised tail plot and the normalised residual plot. By considering the asymptotic distribution of normalised exceedance probabilities, we show that uncertainty bounds for our plots are approximately independent of the sample size used in their construction. This allows us to propose visual diagnostics which can efficiently and consistently compare goodness-of-fit at both a global and regional level, despite varying sample sizes over regions of the covariate domain. Following a discussion of summary statistics for global and regional goodness-of-fit, we provide two applications of extreme value regression models that illustrate how our diagnostics can be used to perform model comparison (across thousands of candidate models) and provide actionable findings that support model design.

2026-06-01T13:45:16Z Ed Mackay Jordan Richards Philip Jonathan http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02234v1 2026-06-01T13:26:48Z

This paper clarifies the identifying assumptions underlying causal inference based on treatment changes rather than treatment levels, and their relationship to conventional identification strategies. We characterize two distinct structural models, with non-nested identifying assumptions, under which treatment-change identification is valid conditional on observed covariates. We demonstrate that the identifying assumptions relying on treatment changes are generally not nested with those of methods relying on treatment levels, such as selection-on-observables strategies that control for past outcomes, treatments, and covariates, or difference-in-differences approaches that difference outcomes rather than treatments over time. We show, however, that under a random-walk restriction on the treatment process, conditioning on treatment changes is equivalent to conditioning on treatment levels given lagged treatment. This and other equivalence results motivate overidentification tests by jointly considering methods based on treatment levels and changes. Beyond these tests, the non-nesting results carry a structural double robustness implication: an estimator that differences both the outcome and the treatment over time, such as two-way fixed effects regression, remains consistent if either the treatment-change assumption or the parallel-trends assumption holds, without requiring both simultaneously. We characterize the causal models consistent with each method, investigate finite-sample behavior in a simulation study, and present an empirical application to cigarette demand.

2026-06-01T13:26:48Z Martin Huber http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02231v1 2026-06-01T13:25:58Z

Temporal systems often exhibit non-stationary behaviour, such as seasonal climate variation or glucose fluctuations in patients with type-1 diabetes. One way to model non-stationarity is through discrete latent regimes, i.e., stationary segments of time. Such systems induce a Markov Switching Model (MSM), a class of Hidden Markov Models with autoregressive dependencies among latent regimes and observed variables. Identifying latent regimes is challenging in the presence of frequent regime switches and nonlinear and non-Gaussian dynamics, particularly when there are instantaneous effects between the variables, e.g., due to slow rates of measurements. In this work, we establish the identifiability of both latent regimes and regime-dependent causal structures under temporal regime dependencies, nonlinear lagged and instantaneous effects, and independent noise from the exponential family. Our identifiability theory subsumes non-temporal mixtures of causal models. Furthermore, we introduce FlowMSM, a regime detection framework that can be paired with any stationary causal discovery method to recover regime-dependent causal structures. Experiments on synthetic benchmarks and a financial economics dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach to detect latent regimes and discover causal structures from non-stationary time series.

2026-06-01T13:25:58Z International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) 2026 Roel Hulsman Carles Balsells-Rodas Sara Magliacane http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02223v1 2026-06-01T13:21:17Z

Estimating the generative mechanism of large-scale networks is a fundamental challenge in statistical machine learning. It requires the identification of the latent connectivity structure, which is in general an NP-hard combinatorial problem due to the absence of canonical node labels. We address this challenge by allowing for probabilistic couplings, thereby relaxing the assignment problem. Our estimation framework can be formulated as a semi-relaxed Gromov-Wasserstein objective and provides a low-dimensional representation of the generative structure. We solve this via a block-coordinate conditional gradient algorithm. Despite the relaxation, the resulting solution is typically deterministic: in fact, we show that the optimality gap between the relaxed solution and the deterministic assignment vanishes at rate $O(1/n)$, where $n$ is the number of nodes. This allows for tractable recovery of the underlying model and enables rigorous statistical analysis: we establish consistency and minimax-optimal convergence rates for both stochastic block models and Holder-smooth graphons. Our implementation scales efficiently with $n$, as demonstrated on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

2026-06-01T13:21:17Z Charles Dufour Ulysse Naepels Leonardo V. Santoro http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02552v4 2026-06-01T13:12:12Z

This paper investigates the detection and estimation of a single change in high-dimensional linear models. We derive minimax lower bounds for the detection boundary and the estimation rate, which uncover a phase transition governed by the sparsity of the covariance-weighted differential parameter. This form of "inherent sparsity" captures a delicate interplay between the covariance structure of the regressors and the change in regression coefficients on the detectability of a change point. Complementing the lower bounds, we introduce two covariance scanning-based methods, McScan and QcSan, which achieve minimax optimal performance (up to possible logarithmic factors) in the sparse and the dense regimes, respectively. In particular, QcScan is the first method shown to achieve consistency in the dense regime and further, we devise a combined procedure which is adaptively minimax optimal across sparse and dense regimes without the knowledge of the sparsity. Computationally, covariance scanning-based methods avoid costly computation of Lasso-type estimators and attain worst-case computation complexity that is linear in the dimension and sample size. Additionally, we consider the post-detection estimation of the differential parameter and the refinement of the change point estimator. Simulation studies support the theoretical findings and demonstrate the computational and statistical efficiency of the proposed covariance scanning methods.

2025-07-03T11:53:31Z Haeran Cho Housen Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02199v1 2026-06-01T12:55:39Z

Multinomial count data, such as microbial composition profiles derived from sequencing studies, frequently contain anomalous observations that distort parameter estimates. The Dirichlet-multinomial (DM) distribution is widely used in this setting but remains sensitive to such contamination. We propose the contaminated Dirichlet-multinomial (CDM) distribution, a two-component mixture in which the regular data come from a DM component with a lower dispersion and the irregular data come from a DM component with an inflated dispersion parameter. This construction accommodates anomalies without requiring their removal, and yields a natural rule for anomaly detection via posterior probabilities. Through sensitivity analyses involving both single-point anomalies and background noise, we demonstrate that the CDM distribution effectively downweights the influence of anomalous observations on the parameter estimates. The model is applied to gut microbiome data from a colorectal carcinogenesis study, where it consistently outperforms the DM distribution across all information criteria and identifies biologically plausible anomaly proportions in both the healthy and carcinoma subsets.

2026-06-01T12:55:39Z Ockert van Heerden Andriëtte Bekker Seite Makgai Arno Otto Antonio Punzo http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13430v3 2026-06-01T12:12:09Z

Selection bias is pervasive in observational studies. For example, large scale biobanks data can exhibit ``healthy volunteer bias'' when respondents are healthier and of higher socio-economic status than the population they are meant to represent. Recovering causal effects from such sub-population is an important problem in causal inference, as estimating average treatment effects (ATE) from selected populations can result in a severely biased estimate of the ATE from the whole population. In this paper, we investigate the identifiability of the ATE under selection bias. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for ATE identifiability, leveraging weak assumptions on probability classes to characterize propensity score and selection probability. Compared to previous works, our results extend existing graphical identifiability criteria and offer a more comprehensive understanding of causal effect identification with strictly weaker conditions in the presence of selection bias.

2026-05-13T12:24:34Z 9 pages for the main text, ICML 2026 Yiwen Qiu Filip Kovačević Shimeng Huang Peter Spirtes Francesco Locatello http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14483v3 2026-06-01T12:01:29Z

Reliable uncertainty quantification for causal effects is crucial in high-stakes applications, but remains challenging when the target is an entire function rather than a scalar estimand. In this work, we introduce a GP-based approach for uncertainty quantification of interventional functions. The central idea is to build on recent work representing interventional functions as an inner-product of observational functions in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), by constructing appropriate GP priors for such functions and inferring posteriors from observational data. Our approach yields closed-form posterior moments and tractable training and inference, while avoiding pathologies of previous GP prior constructions for RKHS functions. We further derive a practical procedure for posterior coverage calibration. Across synthetic benchmarks, causal Bayesian optimization tasks, and a large-scale real dataset, our method improves uncertainty quantification while remaining competitive in causal effect estimation.

2024-10-18T14:06:49Z Hugh Dance Peter Orbanz Arthur Gretton http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02130v1 2026-06-01T11:57:36Z

This article describes the design of a neutral comparison study in the context of empirical studies where the interest is in learning the functional relationship between a continuous errorprone exposure variable and a binary outcome. The performance of combinations of measurement error correction methods and flexible regression modeling techniques was compared using a simulation study. The project involved four independent teams, one devoted to data generation and evaluation, the other three to specific methods of measurement error correction (Simulation-Extrapolation, Regression-Calibration and Multiple imputation, Bayesian method). The study was conducted in three successive stages. In Stage 1, the first team simulated five datasets differing only by the true exposure-outcome functional form and distribution of true exposure. Furthermore, the implementation of flexible modeling methods (B-splines, P-splines, and fractional polynomials) was standardized. The three methods teams, blinded to the underlying data generation process, created the codes to implement their methods, and provided their results to the first team who evaluated them. These codes were then used by this team in the next Stages of the project. In Stage 2, the team simulated 150 additional datasets where other design parameters varied while using the same five exposureoutcome functions. Stage 3 consisted of simulating independent replications of each of the 150 scenarios considered in Stage 2 to quantify the sampling variance of the estimates. This work emphasizes the relevance of neutral comparison studies to fairly evaluate statistical methods aimed at addressing a complex analytical challenge, and demonstrates their feasibility through a large collaborative project.

2026-06-01T11:57:36Z Anne C M Thiébaut CESP Aris Perperouglou GSK Mohammed Sedki IGR, CESP Steve Ferreira Guerra UBC Paul Gustafson UBC Frank E Harrell Willi Sauerbrei Michal Abrahamowicz Laurence S Freedman http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02117v1 2026-06-01T11:49:03Z

Probabilistic time series forecasting has attracted increasing attention in financial applications due to the need to quantify risk and uncertainty in future observations. We propose ProbRes, a post-hoc probabilistic calibration method that explicitly learns and incorporates volatility dynamics into probabilistic forecasting, enabling effective handling of heteroskedastic data. During training, ProbRes employs two architecture-agnostic modules to separately model the conditional mean and conditional volatility. At the inference stage, it generates predictive distributions by resampling normalized residuals. ProbRes is applicable to both univariate and multivariate time series and remains robust under a wide range of error distributions, including non-Gaussian innovations with conditional heteroskedasticity. Theoretical results demonstrate ProbRes's validity and experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that ProbRes accurately captures predictive distributions and produces well-calibrated prediction intervals.

2026-06-01T11:49:03Z Tingting Wang Yunyi Zhang Benyou Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02076v1 2026-06-01T11:05:04Z

Background: Multistate models (MSMs) applied to screening data can characterise the natural history of cancer and predict "stage-shifts" from screening. However, inferring parameters like mean sojourn time (MST) is challenging as disease onset is inherently unobserved in these data. This is even more challenging when characterising heterogeneity between cancer types in multicancer early detection (MCED) trial data. Methods: We utilised simulated longitudinal MCED screening datasets to evaluate the inferential bounds of MSMs under increasing clinical disaggregation: a 3-state (overall MST), 5-state (early/late stage), and 9-state (stages I-IV) model. Bayesian estimation was performed via Markov chain Monte Carlo. Robustness was assessed through chain convergence, parameter identifiability (via profile likelihood), and precision of estimates. We also explored hierarchical models and the use of informative priors to improve identifiability. Results: Based only on MCED trial data, many cancer types exhibited inferential challenges. Generally, the 5-state model was as robust as the 3-state model, showing slight improvements to convergence and identifiability while maintaining precision for overall MST. In contrast, the 9-state model showed worsened convergence and identifiability, and a significant reduction in the precision of overall MST estimates. Hierarchical models successfully improved performance, as have informative prior models but the latter introduced bias towards the prior values. Conclusions: While disaggregating natural history models by individual cancer stages is desirable for policy, these higher-dimensional models show a greater reliance on external data/assumptions. We recommend explicit identifiability assessments and assessments of the influence of external data/assumptions to support inference for MCED screening evaluations.

2026-06-01T11:05:04Z 26 pages, 5 Tables, 1 Figure, 2 Boxes MO Soares J Lange K Gogebakan S Dias NJ Welton R Etzioni AE Ades S Palmer http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02065v1 2026-06-01T10:55:37Z

While it is well-known how to compute the cells of a Laguerre tessellation for a given set of weighted generator points, it is not obvious how to invert a Laguerre tessellation. That is, given that one observes a Laguerre tessellation, how can one retrieve the weighted generators corresponding to the observed cells. In this paper, we consider inversion of a class of random Laguerre tessellations known as Poisson-Laguerre tessellations. The weighted generators of observed cells of a Poisson-Laguerre tessellation are of interest because knowledge of these weighted generators is useful for statistical inference of Poisson-Laguerre tessellations. For general Laguerre tessellations we provide a characterization of all configurations of weighted generator points which yield the same Laguerre tessellation. For Poisson-Laguerre tessellations we propose a method for consistent inversion, meaning that as one observes the tessellation through increasing observation windows, a closer approximation of the original weighted generators can be obtained. In a simulation study we examine both performance of the inversion procedure, as well as the use of the obtained approximated weighted generators for nonparametrically estimating the weight distribution function corresponding to a Poisson-Laguerre tessellation.

2026-06-01T10:55:37Z Thomas van der Jagt Geurt Jongbloed Martina Vittorietti