https://arxiv.org/api/9KOMpL2861mWz56y3DY6nhxPDSw 2026-06-14T00:16:32Z 23522 180 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07622v1 2026-05-30T13:56:36Z

Accurate passenger queue forecasting in airport terminals is essential for efficient departure operations, as it enables proactive congestion management. However, time-varying passenger demand and heterogeneous facility usage across multiple departure facilities make forecasting challenging. In this work, we propose a passenger queue forecasting framework that learns historical passenger flow patterns from operational data. The proposed model employs a Transformer-based architecture to capture temporal dependencies and inter-facility correlations using past queue length and waiting time at departure gates and security checkpoints, together with passenger throughput at check-in islands. The learned representations are mapped to two facility-specific MLP heads to predict queue length and waiting time at departure gates and security checkpoints. Experimental results demonstrate accurate forecasts up to two hours ahead. The proposed approach offers practical real-time decision support for proactive queue management and staff reallocation in airport terminal operations.

2026-05-30T13:56:36Z 9 pages, 6 figures, accepted at DASC 2026 Juhwan Lee Seokbin Yoon Keumjin Lee Hojong Baik Seyeon Jung http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12895v2 2026-05-30T04:52:59Z

Clinical decision-support systems are expert systems whose recommendations clinicians act on directly, yet they are usually cleared on one aggregate accuracy number from a held-out test set. That number says nothing about input reliability under encoding shifts, subgroup gaps, threshold sensitivity, or operational feasibility. We present RISED, a pre-deployment evaluation framework operationalising five dimensions (Reliability, Inclusivity, Sensitivity, Equity, Deployability) through BCa bootstrap 95% confidence intervals, literature-grounded thresholds, and Holm-Bonferroni-corrected PASS / FAIL / INCONCLUSIVE verdicts; Equity is a proxy-dependence diagnostic rather than a gating test. Applied to seven cohorts spanning 35 years (n from 303 to 99,492), RISED surfaces failures invisible to AUROC: on Diabetes 130, Reliability passes by three orders of magnitude (PSS = 0.0004) while Inclusivity (AUC parity gap = 0.262) and Sensitivity (max threshold-flip rate 49.1%) fail decisively; both NHIS cohorts reproduce this. NHANES 2021-2023, with a complete feature profile, achieves INCONCLUSIVE verdicts; BRFSS 2024 produces the suite's most severe Sensitivity failure (max threshold-flip rate 64.2%) after instrument rotation removed hypertension and cholesterol. The pattern recurs on credit- and income-prediction cohorts, confirming domain-agnosticity; a multi-model check shows the failures are data-driven, not model-specific. RISED ships as an open-source Python package complementing TRIPOD+AI, FUTURE-AI, and Fairlearn with the structured numerical evidence those standards require but do not prescribe.

2026-05-13T02:17:13Z 39 pages, 7 figures, 15 tables. Code at https://github.com/rohithreddybc/rised-healthcare-eval and dataset at https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/8734 (Hugging Face). To be submitted to Expert Systems with Applications (Elsevier) Rohith Reddy Bellibatlu Manpreet Singh Yash Jajoo Shyamal Lakhanpal Abhishek Israni http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00481v1 2026-05-30T02:22:22Z

This research presents a novel stochastic framework for proactive cybersecurity defense timing under a single attack scenario. The approach models the defense process as a continuous observation mechanism in which the defense instant and the subsequent observation slot follow independent exponential distributions. Laplace-Carson transforms combined with first-excess theory yield the joint detection function that brackets the attack moment. Marginalization under Markovian Poisson arrivals then produces the probability density of the defense moment and conditional expectations of pre-attack and post-attack observation times. These closed-form results enable quantitative assessment of defense timing sensitivity to threat intensity and support precise calibration of observation parameters for low-latency proactive measures. Major contributions include the explicit derivation of marginal distributions and expected values, visualization of defense moment density, and the bridging of stochastic duel methodology with practical cybersecurity applications.

2026-05-30T02:22:22Z Target to submit an international journal Song-Kyoo Kim http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00578v2 2026-05-29T23:18:32Z

Marked correlation functions, in which galaxy properties such as luminosity or stellar mass are treated as marks, are widely used to test models of galaxy formation. In astronomy, however, these statistics are typically implemented as summary measures that do not preserve the joint structure of mark pairs conditioned on separation. In this work, we formulate galaxies as points $(x,m)$ on the product space $\mathbb{R}^3\times\mathcal{M}$, where $x$ denotes position and $m$ a mark, and introduce the joint pair correlation function $g(r;m_1,m_2)$ as the fundamental quantity describing mark-dependent clustering. We further define a diagnostic quantity $Δ_{\mathrm{ind}}(r;m_1,m_2)$ that locally quantifies deviations from the independence hypothesis relative to spatial clustering alone, thereby providing a projection-free description of which mark pairs are over- or underrepresented at a given separation scale. Within this framework, commonly used diagnostics such as the inhomogeneous cross-$J$ function are naturally interpreted as summary statistics obtained through averaging over mark sets and geometric-event-based reductions of the joint structure. This perspective clarifies that previously discussed marked effects, including assembly bias, correspond to projections of an underlying joint dependence, and that observationally accessible information is the existence of non-factorizable joint structure itself. The present formulation provides both a fundamental quantity and practical diagnostics for its characterization.

2026-04-01T07:37:30Z 10 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS Tsutomu T. Takeuchi Nagoya University and Institute of Statistical Mathematics 10.1093/mnras/stag1015 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00402v1 2026-05-29T22:37:13Z

We propose a distribution-free statistical framework that converts arbitrary rewrite-based detectors into detectors with finite-sample FDR guarantees without retraining. Our key observation is that rewrite-based detection implicitly constructs knockoff samples, enabling LLM-generated text detection to be formulated as a multiple hypothesis testing problem with knockoff structure. This perspective separates the design of detection statistics from the control of false discoveries, allowing existing rewrite detectors to inherit finite-sample false discovery rate (FDR) guarantees through a simple calibration procedure. We demonstrate reliable FDR control with meaningful detection power across three detection models, 19 domains, and four LLMs.

2026-05-29T22:37:13Z Yi Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00346v1 2026-05-29T20:36:56Z

Phenomena such as epidemiological processes, hydrologic systems, social platforms, utility services, and supply chains can be represented as topological networks. A central question about these networks concerns connectivity and the permeability of edges. Dyadic regression and related approaches have been proposed to identify network features associated with pairwise node-level differences. In high-dimensional settings, it is important to control the number of spuriously selected features. However, controlling the false discovery rate for dyadic outcomes is challenging because dependence among dyads invalidates classic asymptotic procedures and complicates standard data splitting and knockoff approaches. We propose a novel knockoff variable selection procedure that simulates synthetic features directly on the topological network prior to constructing the augmented design matrix in dyadic space. Empirically, our method controls the false discovery rate for both node- and edge-level features. The Benjamini-Hochberg, Benjamini-Yekutieli, Storey Q-value, data-splitting, and standard knockoff procedures were all anticonservative. We applied our network knockoffs to assess the impassability of over 1000 stream barriers in North Carolina for Salvelinus fontinalis. Compared to data splitting and traditional knockoff approaches, our proposed approach selected a higher proportion of barriers previously assessed to impede fish movement.

2026-05-29T20:36:56Z 20 pages, 6 figures Justin Van Ee Yoichiro Kanno Jacob Rash Mevin Hooten http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00327v1 2026-05-29T20:09:20Z

Clustering is widely used across the sciences as the foundation for downstream data-driven scientific discoveries. However, clustering results are highly sensitive to the choice of algorithm, preprocessing, and the number of clusters $k$, producing scientific claims that are often not reproducible. The current state of the art for validating clustering solutions consists of clustering validation indices (CVIs) such as Silhouette, Davies-Bouldin, and Calinski-Harabasz, which rely on geometric assumptions that break down on the heavy-tailed, high-dimensional, and nonlinearly structured data encountered in biomedical research. Resampling-based alternatives - grounded in the ideas of clustering stability and generalizability - have been proposed but remain scattered across specialized tools with no unified, accessible software. We fill this gap with CARVE (Cluster Analysis with Resampling for Validation and Exploration), an open-source Python and R package that jointly evaluates multiple clustering algorithms and hyperparameters, returning stability and generalizability diagnostics at the global, cluster, and sample level together with principled selection rules and consensus-based cluster labels. Across six synthetic benchmarks CARVE consistently recovers near-optimal clusterings where classical indices degrade substantially. On experimental genomics and proteomics data sets, CARVE recovers finer biological structure when classical CVIs collapse entirely. CARVE is available with a scikit-learn-compatible Python API and an analogous R interface compatible with Seurat workflows.

2026-05-29T20:09:20Z Kai R. Wycik Tiffany M. Tang Tarek M. Zikry Genevera I. Allen http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07614v1 2026-05-29T19:33:31Z

Reliable measurement of income and consumption is essential for monitoring poverty and inequality in low- and middle-income countries, yet full household surveys are costly and difficult to implement regularly. This paper examines whether reduced survey instruments can preserve key distributional information. We apply Random Forest Recursive Feature Elimination (RF-RFE) to the 2018/19 Nigeria General Household Survey-Panel to identify the income sources, consumption categories and household characteristics that best classify individuals within the welfare distribution. The analysis focuses on three outcomes: poverty status, location in the quintile distribution and position relative to the Gini-based inequality line. The survey's post-planting and post-harvest periods allow us to assess performance under different seasonal contexts. Results show that RF-RFE achieves strong classification accuracy with few predictors. For consumption, poverty status and inequality-line position are accurately predicted using a small set of expenditure categories, while quintile classification reaches about 80 percent accuracy for seasonal consumption and 60--65 percent for annual consumption predicted from a single seasonal visit. For income, poverty status reaches around 90 percent accuracy with five predictors, and inequality-line position is largely captured by labour earnings. The findings suggest that machine-learning methods can help improve survey design and reduce data requirements while retaining much of the distributional information needed to measure and monitor poverty and inequality.

2026-05-29T19:33:31Z Vanesa Jordá Miguel Niño-Zarazúa http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00262v1 2026-05-29T18:47:27Z

InfoNCE is the standard contrastive learning objective, but its softmax form is not only a computational convenience: it also encodes a statistical assumption about how the top-scoring example is selected. Using extreme value theory, we show that this assumption is often misaligned with the normalized embedding setting used in modern contrastive learning. Motivated by this mismatch, we propose \textsc{WEINCE}, a simple modification of InfoNCE that uses anchor-wise online batch statistics to blend the usual softmax logits with an endpoint shortfall correction, adding no trainable parameters. Across five vision benchmarks, \textsc{WEINCE} yields consistent improvements in frozen-feature evaluation. These results show that a more faithful statistical treatment of hard negatives can improve contrastive objectives.

2026-05-29T18:47:27Z Presented in ICML 2026 Melihcan Erol Suat Evren Oktay Ozel Alexander Morgan Jongha Jon Ryu Lizhong Zheng http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31567v1 2026-05-29T17:34:03Z

Routinely collected data, such as electronic health record (EHR) data, are frequently used for biomedical research, but these data are prone to errors, which can bias study findings. Validating data in subsamples of records can reduce bias, and the efficiency of estimates can be improved by incorporating in analyses both the error-prone data available on the entire cohort and the validated data available on the subsample. One approach to incorporate both data sources is with generalized raking, which calibrates validation sampling weights using error-prone data from the entire cohort. Motivated by an EHR study of maternal weight gain during pregnancy with a validation subsample, we develop and illustrate generalized raking techniques for cumulative probability models (CPMs). CPMs are robust, rank-based and semiparametric models for continuous, ordinal, or mixed type outcome data. We develop efficient generalized raking estimators for CPMs, evaluate their performance relative to competing methods, and demonstrate the utility and strengths of generalized raking with CPMs in a study that examines factors associated with weight gain during pregnancy.

2026-05-29T17:34:03Z Eric S. Kawaguchi Chun Li Frank E. Harrell Pamela A. Shaw Thomas Lumley Bryan E. Shepherd http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06528v5 2026-05-29T16:29:44Z

In Bayesian statistics, the highest posterior density (HPD) interval is often used to describe properties of a posterior distribution. As a method for estimating confidence intervals (CIs), the HPD has two main desirable properties. Firstly, it is the shortest interval to have a specified coverage probability. Secondly, every point inside the HPD interval has a density greater than every point outside the interval. However, the HPD interval is sometimes criticized for being transformation invariant. We make the case that under certain conditions the HPD interval is a natural analog to the frequentist profile likelihood ratio confidence interval (LRCI). Our main result is to derive a proof showing that under specified conditions, the HPD interval with respect to the density mode is transformation invariant for monotonic functions in a manner which is similar to a profile LRCI.

2024-12-09T14:30:35Z This paper needs to be revised such that it frames as transformation invariance with respect to relative likelihood, which is an acceptable concept within Likelihood Framework, but not acceptable within the orthodox Frequentist framework A. X. Venu http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31511v1 2026-05-29T16:29:35Z

Medical decision-making increasingly requires rapid and reliable assignment of patients to disease subtypes, as many diseases are no longer treated as single entities. For example, cancer patients may be stratified into aggressive and non-aggressive subtypes, with different treatment strategies for each group. We propose a Bayesian nonparametric approach based on a Dirichlet process mixture model for clustering individuals into disease subtypes. We implement a coordinate ascent variational inference algorithm, yielding an effective and computationally efficient alternative to Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), to support medical decision-making. In synthetic experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed approach accurately assigns observations to their ground-truth clusters, achieving strong performance across evaluation metrics, such as homogeneity and completeness. Additionally, we illustrate the proposed approach achieves a substantial improvement in computational cost compared to MCMC, without sacrificing accuracy that would lead to the increased risk of misdiagnosis.

2026-05-29T16:29:35Z Inga Huld Ármann Ioanna Papatsouma Marina Evangelou http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.21688v4 2026-05-29T15:54:34Z

Racial disparities in healthcare expenditures are well-documented, yet the underlying drivers remain complex. This study develops a framework to decompose such disparities through shifts in the distributions of mediating variables, rather than treating race itself as a manipulable exposure. We define disparities as differences in covariate-adjusted outcome distributions across racial groups, and decompose the total disparity into a component attributable to differences in mediator distributions, and a residual component that remains after equalizing those distributions. Using data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS), we examine the extent to which expenditure disparities would persist or be reduced if mediators such as socioeconomic status (SES), insurance access, health behaviors, or health status were equalized across racial groups. To ensure valid inference, we derive asymptotically linear estimators based on influence-function techniques and flexible machine learning, including super learners and a two-part model designed for the zero-inflated, right-skewed nature of expenditure data. Applying this framework to MEPS data from 2009 and 2016, substantial disparities were observed across all pairwise racial comparisons, with the largest gaps observed between non-Hispanic Whites and Hispanics in both years. Differences in SES and health status were the largest contributors to these disparities, with insurance access also playing a meaningful role, particularly for Hispanic populations, whereas health behaviors contributed minimally. Residual disparities persisted, especially in comparisons involving non-Hispanic Whites, suggesting the influence of unmeasured or structural factors.

2025-04-30T14:23:50Z Statistics in Medicine, 45(13-14), e70606, 2026 Xiaxian Ou Xinwei He David Benkeser Razieh Nabi 10.1002/sim.70606 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31394v1 2026-05-29T14:58:50Z

Healthcare mobility -- patients seeking treatment outside their territory of residence -- represents a major source of inequality and financial imbalance in decentralised health systems. In Italy, persistent north-south asymmetries in patient flows among Local Health Authorities (ASLs) have reinforced existing disparities within the National Health Service; yet the structural organisation and temporal dynamics of these flows remain poorly understood at the sub-regional level. We propose a Bayesian dynamic latent space model for directed weighted networks with a hurdle negative binomial likelihood, and apply it to administrative discharge records on mobility for hip replacement procedures among 109 Italian ASLs over 2018-2024. The model jointly addresses excess zeros, overdispersion and network dependence, while capturing directional heterogeneity through multiplicative sender and receiver effects and controlling for differences in territorial size via an appropriate exposure term. Applied to Italian mobility data, the model reveals the evolving geometry of the healthcare system, quantifies the disruption induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, and uncovers structural asymmetries in outward propensity and ASLs attractiveness. The framework provides a flexible tool for the statistical analysis of dynamic healthcare mobility networks with direct relevance to the monitoring and evaluation of territorial healthcare provision.

2026-05-29T14:58:50Z Cecilia Manente Marco Alfò Silvia D'Angelo http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31282v1 2026-05-29T13:14:32Z

GPS mobility data are increasingly used in epidemic modeling, allowing the construction of co-location networks or population flows. These trajectories typically exhibit high temporal sparsity because data collection is opportunistic and tied to phone use. Despite growing awareness of this limitation, the analysis and treatment of biases derived from it have been largely overlooked in existing epidemic modeling studies, raising concerns about the robustness of downstream inferences. We introduce a principled framework to quantify the impact of trajectory sparsity on key epidemic modeling outcomes across different levels of missingness. Our approach leverages a highly-complete dataset that exhibits both near-complete and sparse GPS trajectories. Near-complete trajectories provide baseline epidemic outcomes, while sparse trajectories provide realistic missingness patterns that we impose on the baseline to measure bias. In this way, we show how missing records can result in substantial underestimation of key measures of epidemic intensity, explained not only by the amount of missing data, but by more complex features of data missingness that should be taken into account when designing correction methods. Finally, we propose and evaluate a correction based on inverse probability weighting of network edges before epidemic model calibration, which is shown to reduce bias and parameter misspecification. We also demonstrate this correction on a separate anonymized sample from a commercial GPS mobility dataset and report on its effect. Together, our findings provide a first rigorous quantification of trajectory-sparsity bias in epidemic modeling, offering initial guidance on the treatment of this issue.

2026-05-29T13:14:32Z 15 pages, 4 figures Federico Delussu Francisco Barreras Yuan Liao Duncan J. Watts Laura Alessandretti