https://arxiv.org/api/+cDE7vLRkaXDUQexK4mJ7O26fQk 2026-06-13T17:04:41Z 2259 75 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01300v1 2026-05-02T07:21:08Z

Traditional technical analysis indicators, although widely used by market participants, are often not sufficiently effective. We propose the Visibility Graphs Relative Strength Index (VGRSI), based on backward visibility relations in the price of a financial instrument. Rescaled to the 0--100 range, it can generate profitable trading signals. The performance of the indicator was evaluated using an automated trading strategy based on a 30-day optimisation window and a 7-day test window for three instruments representing different asset classes: DJI30, EUR/USD and XAU/USD over the 2024--2025 period (503 trading days). The strategy based on VGRSI signals generated a profit of USD~146,000 for DJI30, USD~69,000 for EUR/USD, and USD~125,000 for XAU/USD. This gives a total result of USD$\sim$340,000, which corresponds to an average profit of USD$\sim$676 per trading day, with a fixed investment of USD~1,000 to open a single trade. For all three assets, the strategy generated substantial profits while maintaining a moderate drawdown (10--18\% relative to a portfolio value of USD~10,000), a relatively low trading intensity (3.3--4.8 trades per day) and high Sharpe ratio values (2.55--3.6). These results indicate that VGRSI constitutes a promising technical analysis tool that goes beyond the classical trend-following approach by exploiting the geometric properties of asset price fluctuations.

2026-05-02T07:21:08Z 16 pages, 3 figures, 1 table Rafał Rak http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02921v2 2026-05-02T05:14:42Z

Prior research shows that large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic extrapolation bias when forming predictions from both experimental and real-world data, and that prompt-based approaches appear limited in alleviating this bias. We propose a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) approach that uses Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to train off-the-shelf LLMs on instruction datasets constructed from rational benchmark forecasts. By intervening at the parameter level, SFT changes how LLMs map observed information into forecasts and thereby mitigates extrapolation bias. We evaluate the fine-tuned model in two settings: controlled forecasting experiments and cross-sectional stock return prediction. In both settings, fine-tuning corrects the extrapolative bias out-of-sample, establishing a low-cost and generalizable method for debiasing LLMs.

2026-04-03T09:37:07Z Zhenyu Gao Wenxi Jiang Yutong Yan http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12532v1 2026-05-01T16:25:43Z

Conventional algorithmic trading systems are grounded in deterministic heuristics or offline-trained statistical models that cannot adapt to the semantic complexity of rapidly shifting market regimes. This paper introduces AGENTICAITA, an agentic AI framework that replaces the traditional signal then execute paradigm with a fully autonomous deliberative loop in which multiple specialized Large Language Model agents reason, negotiate, and act in concert - without any offline training or human intervention. The framework proposes four architectural contributions: (i) an Adaptive Z-Score Trigger Engine that acts as a cognitive resource allocator, gating LLM inference exclusively on statistically anomalous market conditions; (ii) a Sequential Deliberative Pipeline - the core agentic contribution - in which an Analyst agent, a Risk Manager agent, and an Executor agent form a structured reasoning chain governed by typed JSON contracts and a deterministic hard-gate safety layer; (iii) an Inference Gating Protocol, a mutex-based cognitive resource scheduler that serializes concurrent agent activations and ensures fully reproducible audit trails; and (iv) a Correlation-Break Diversification composite score that operationalizes portfolio-level idiosyncratic signal prioritization within individual agent reasoning. Validated over a five-day autonomous dry-run session under live market conditions, the framework demonstrates operational correctness of the deliberative pipeline, achieving 157 zero-intervention invocations across 76 assets with an 11.5% agentic friction rate that confirms non-trivial inter-agent negotiation. This preliminary proof-of-concept establishes the feasibility of training-free, deterministic safety-constrained multi-agent orchestration in financial decision loops, with statistically robust performance evaluation and execution cost modeling deferred to extended live deployment.

2026-05-01T16:25:43Z Ivan Letteri http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00459v1 2026-05-01T06:45:23Z

We carry the deadline-resolved Information Leakage Score (ILS-dl) framework of Nechepurenko (2026a, 2026b) from a single-case proof of concept to a population-scale evaluation across 12,708 Polymarket markets, October 2020 to April 2026. We frame the paper as a scope-discovery study: scaling reveals that the framework's effective domain is materially narrower than initial framing suggested, and the principal obstacle is not score computation but resolution semantics. We report four findings. First, only 88 of 12,708 candidate markets (0.7%) yield computable ILS-dl values; only 1 of 32 markets in the ForesightFlow Insider Cases (FFIC) inventory is in scope, and 14 of 32 FFIC markets are flagged unclassifiable due to genuine resolution-criterion ambiguity. Second, only 12 of the 88 computed markets (13.6%) satisfy anchor-sensitivity, and an independent-second-pass T_event validation reaches 57.8% exact-date agreement, below the 90% ex-ante criterion. Third, raw ILS-dl medians are negative across all six (sub-bucket by period) cells, but a hazard-decay baseline correction we introduce yields a heterogeneous result: regulatory_formal post-2024 shifts to near-zero (-0.21 to -0.02), while regulatory_announcement post-2024 retains a 95% bootstrap CI entirely below zero. Fourth, the constant-hazard exponential of Nechepurenko (2026b) is rejected in favor of Weibull on the pooled post-2024 cell, but a per-subcategory check confirms the preference reflects category mixture rather than within-cell duration dependence. The implication is that detection of informed flow requires methodological refinement on the resolution-typology and score-baseline axes, not only on the score-computation axis where prior work concentrated.

2026-05-01T06:45:23Z 47 pages, 14 tables, 4 appendices. Datasets and code released at https://github.com/ForesightFlow under CC-BY-4.0 / MIT Maksym Nechepurenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20965v2 2026-04-30T15:16:04Z

This paper studies whether a lightweight supervised aggregator can combine diverse zero-shot large language model outputs into a stronger downstream signal for corporate disclosure classification. Zero-shot LLMs can read disclosures without task-specific fine-tuning, but their predictions often vary across prompt perspectives, model families, and confidence levels. I examine this problem with a multi-prompt framework in which three fixed zero-shot LLM classifiers read each disclosure from different financial perspectives and output a sentiment label, a confidence score, and a short rationale. A logistic meta-classifier then aggregates these outputs to predict next-day stock return direction. To reduce pretrained-model contamination, I restrict evaluation to a post-release sample of 9{,}860 U.S.\ corporate disclosures issued by large publicly traded firms between January 2025 and March 2026, after the release of the frozen base LLMs used in the experiment. Results show that the trained aggregator outperforms single classifiers, majority vote, confidence-weighted voting, a zero-shot LLM judge, and a FinBERT baseline. Balanced accuracy rises from 0.566 for the best single classifier to 0.606 for the trained aggregator. The gain is largest in mixed-signal disclosures where classifiers disagree. The results suggest that zero-shot LLM outputs contain complementary financial signals, while also showing that the strongest gains come from supervised aggregation rather than from zero-shot voting alone.

2026-03-21T22:29:19Z Kemal Kirtac http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27041v1 2026-04-29T17:19:45Z

Prediction-market price moves are widely treated as informationally equivalent: a price jump is read the same way regardless of whether it reflects durable Bayesian updating, transient liquidity pressure, strategic position adjustment, or genuine disagreement. This paper formalizes the Signal Credibility Index (SCI) introduced in Nechepurenko (2026) as a stand-alone diagnostic. We make four contributions: (i) a revised persistence component using the persistence ratio PR(t,w) on logit prices, well-defined on short rolling windows; (ii) a weighted Cobb-Douglas form SCI(ααα) with flow-based concentration HHI_flow; (iii) a time-varying specification SCI(t; w) for real-time monitoring; and (iv) Monte Carlo validation including an out-of-distribution stress test, coordinated multi-wallet manipulation, and a logistic-regression benchmark. The validation establishes discrimination among designed microstructure regimes, not external evidence of downstream coordination effects. We document two failure modes consistent with the index targeting coordination credibility rather than pure information content: a Type II error on informed-but-concentrated whale repricing, and a Type I error on coordinated multi-wallet manipulation.

2026-04-29T17:19:45Z 19 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables. Companion to arXiv:2604.24147. Replication code: https://github.com/ForesightFlow/signal-credibility-index Maksym Nechepurenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26747v1 2026-04-29T14:46:10Z

LLM agents are promising tools for empirical discovery, but their flexibility can also turn discovery into uncontrolled search. We study how to use agents under a reproducible protocol through cryptocurrency factor discovery. Our framework casts the task as sequential hypothesis search: an agent reads an append-only experiment trace, proposes falsifiable factor hypotheses, and maps them to executable recipes, while a deterministic engine enforces fixed data splits, selection gates, transaction costs, and portfolio tests. Candidate actions are restricted to a point-in-time factor DSL, making both successful and failed hypotheses auditable. A ridge-combined portfolio trained only on 2020--2022 data achieves a 44.55% annualized return and Sharpe ratio of 1.55 in the 2024--2026 pure out-of-sample period after a 5 basis point one-way trading cost.

2026-04-29T14:46:10Z Yikuan Huang Zheqi Fan Kaiqi Hu Yifan Ye http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18602v2 2026-04-29T09:27:28Z

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into financial systems, understanding their behavioural properties is crucial. Do LLMs conform to the rational expectations paradigm, do they exhibit human-like "animal spirits", or do they instead manifest distinct "machine spirits"? We investigate these questions with a simulated financial market, exploring the behaviour of 15 LLMs spanning a range of sizes, capabilities, and providers. Our results show that LLMs exhibit a spectrum of economic behaviours, from stable coordination on the fundamental value to human-like speculative bubbles. These behaviours are generally inconsistent with the rational expectations hypothesis. We also consider an ecology of heterogeneous agents, a more realistic setting compared to markets with identical LLM agents. These mixed markets can produce outcomes which vary substantially across repeated simulations. Even the most advanced models fail to consistently stabilise the market, with price bubbles sometimes forming despite only a minority of agents naturally forming bubbles. Instead, advanced models in mixed markets adapt their forecasting strategies to the behaviour of other agents. This adaptation can allow them to successfully exploit less sophisticated counterparts and achieve higher profits, but can also contribute to increased market volatility. These findings suggest that the introduction of AI agents into financial markets fundamentally reshapes their ecology. In particular, heterogeneous populations of LLMs can generate endogenous instability, while individual-level adaptation may amplify, rather than mitigate, market volatility.

2026-04-09T17:30:18Z 46 pages, 6 figures Maxime Saxena Marco Pangallo Cars Hommes Fabio Caccioli R. Maria del Rio-Chanona http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02518v2 2026-04-29T08:32:09Z

This paper develops a model for option market making in which the hedging activity of the market maker generates price impact on the underlying asset. The option order flow is modeled by Cox processes, with intensities depending on the state of the underlying and on the market maker's quoted prices. The resulting dynamics combine stochastic option demand with both permanent and transient impact on the underlying, leading to a coupled evolution of inventory and price. We first study market manipulation and arbitrage phenomena that may arise from the feedback between option trading and underlying impact. We then establish the well-posedness of the mixed control problem, which involves continuous quoting decisions and impulsive hedging actions. Finally, we implement a numerical method based on policy optimization to approximate optimal strategies and illustrate the interplay between option market liquidity, inventory risk, and underlying impact.

2025-11-04T12:13:44Z Applied Mathematical Finance (2026) Paulin Aubert Etienne Chevalier Vathana Ly Vath 10.1080/1350486X.2026.2671725 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26063v1 2026-04-28T18:59:42Z

Traditional moving average convergence divergence (MACD) trading rules are often constrained by signal lag and susceptibility to false signals. To address these limitations, this study develops a volume-price-adjusted MACD (VP-MACD) framework that incorporates volume, volatility, and intraday price structure into the conventional indicator, and introduces a sensitivity parameter to allow earlier trade entry and improve responsiveness to market movements. Using the S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, and Dow Jones Industrial Average as representative U.S. equity indices, the model is calibrated over historical records from 2018 to 2022 and evaluated out of sample over 2023 to February 2026. The results indicate that the proposed framework generally delivers better economic performance than the baseline MACD strategy in terms of profitability, risk-adjusted return, and downside-risk control, while generating fewer but more selective trading signals. These findings suggest that incorporating additional market information into technical trading rules may enhance signal quality in U.S. equity index markets.

2026-04-28T18:59:42Z 33 pages, 10 figures, 6 tables Luyun Lin Lixing Lin Zhen Zhang Moxuan Zheng Yiqing Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09655v2 2026-04-28T16:44:35Z

Traditional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks are effective for handling sequential data but have limitations such as gradient vanishing and difficulty in capturing long-term dependencies, which can impact their performance in dynamic and risky environments like stock trading. To address these limitations, this study explores the usage of the newly introduced Extended Long Short Term Memory (xLSTM) network in combination with a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approach for automated stock trading. Our proposed method utilizes xLSTM networks in both actor and critic components, enabling effective handling of time series data and dynamic market environments. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), with its ability to balance exploration and exploitation, is employed to optimize the trading strategy. Experiments were conducted using financial data from major tech companies over a comprehensive timeline, demonstrating that the xLSTM-based model outperforms LSTM-based methods in key trading evaluation metrics, including cumulative return, average profitability per trade, maximum earning rate, maximum pullback, and Sharpe ratio. These findings mark the potential of xLSTM for enhancing DRL-based stock trading systems.

2025-03-12T10:56:03Z Journal of Innovations in Computer Science and Engineering (JICSE), vol. 2, 2025 Faezeh Sarlakifar Mohammadreza Mohammadzadeh Asl Sajjad Rezvani Khaledi Armin Salimi-Badr 10.48308/jicse.2025.239844.1077 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23608v2 2026-04-28T10:54:14Z

Financial markets are often modelled as if time were unique and continuous across assets and markets. Financial markets are however asynchronous, order flow is event-driven, and waiting times between events are often random. Many of the most influential formulations of financial market models presuppose a unique global calendar time and advocate for this or that preferred single latent continuous-time price system. Here we critically contrast these assumptions with event-time, renewal, point-process, and order-flow descriptions. We revisit no-arbitrage, no-dynamic-arbitrage, and risk-neutral option pricing in settings where the market is represented as a discrete event system and where the continuum limit of a discrete-time random walk need not be unique. The central suggestion is then that such non-uniqueness points to a more foundational form of market incompleteness than is usually emphasized. This highlights the importance of operational time at the level of decision making but reminds market practitioners that managing risk itself often requires reconciling operational time with a global calendar time. At these longer time scales forms of effective or average completeness may still emerge at lower frequencies and remain useful for portfolio construction and risk management, even if high-frequency hedging and execution expose a clock mismatch between trading, pricing, and longer-horizon allocation.

2026-04-26T08:48:12Z 8 Pages, minor corrections Chris Angstmann Tim Gebbie http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24147v1 2026-04-27T08:02:34Z

Prediction markets are widely treated as forecasting devices that reveal collective expectations about uncertain futures. This article argues that under specifiable conditions they also function as coordination mechanisms: public probabilities that organize the behavior of voters, donors, journalists, traders, and institutions in ways that can be self-fulfilling or self-defeating. Most existing work asks whether prediction markets forecast accurately; this paper asks whether accurate forecasting is even the right criterion for a market that has become a public coordination device. Drawing on transaction-level evidence from the 2024 U.S. presidential election, we show that the social force of a market signal depends less on its size than on its persistence, the breadth of responding trader types, and cross-platform consensus. We introduce a Signal Credibility Index (SCI) -- combining the variance ratio VR(6), a two-sidedness diagnostic, and a trader-concentration adjustment -- as a microstructure-grounded criterion for predicting when price moves acquire behavioral traction. Applied to three major 2024 political shocks, the framework reveals that superficially similar events generated qualitatively distinct signal types with different implications for elite coordination. A cross-platform comparison establishes a systematic decoupling of social authority from epistemic robustness: the most visible market produced the least accurate forecasts. The framework carries direct implications for regulating prediction markets as democratic information infrastructure.

2026-04-27T08:02:34Z 35 pages, 5 figures Maksym Nechepurenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23961v1 2026-04-27T02:08:33Z

This paper proposes an Extended State-Dependent Hawkes Process (ExsdHawkes) to model the intricate dynamics of Limit Order Books (LOBs). Our theoretical contribution lies in relaxing traditional constraints by allowing for state disappearances -- a phenomenon frequently observed in high-frequency trading. We mathematically prove, using Karush--Kuhn--Tucker (KKT) conditions, that the maximum likelihood estimation remains separable, justifying an efficient two-step procedure. In the empirical section, we apply our model to three months of high-frequency tick data of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (8306). We demonstrate that ExsdHawkes uniquely reproduces the volatility signature plot's characteristic upward slope by capturing the "local super-criticality" triggered during disequilibrium states. Crucially, we identify Marketable Limit Orders (MLO) as the primary catalyst that forces the LOB into these unstable states. Comparative analysis reveals that models lacking physical constraints (e.g., standard SD-Hawkes) suffer from explosive branching ratios and fail to maintain simulation stability. Our findings suggest that physical consistency is not merely a mathematical nicety, but a prerequisite for accurately modeling macro-level volatility. By enforcing the physical geometry to `pause' the residual accumulation during inadmissible periods, ExsdHawkes uniquely maintains statistical integrity where unconstrained models succumb to structural bias.

2026-04-27T02:08:33Z 20 pages, 8 figures. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20K14366 and CREST, JST Akitoshi Kimura http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12082v2 2026-04-26T17:23:21Z

Battery energy storage systems (BESS) participating in multi-market electricity trading require price forecasts to optimize dispatch decisions. A widely held assumption is that forecast accuracy, measured by standard metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE), drives trading performance. We challenge this assumption using a hierarchical three-layer optimization system trading simultaneously on frequency containment reserve (FCR), automatic frequency restoration reserve (aFRR), day-ahead, and continuous intraday (XBID) markets in Germany and Switzerland over 2020-2025, with real market data from Regelleistung.net and Swissgrid. We find that rank correlation (Kendall tau), rather than MAE, is the primary predictor of intraday dispatch value: forecasts above an empirical threshold of tau approximately 0.85-0.95 capture up to 97-100% of perfect-foresight revenue, while persistence forecasts with near-zero tau capture only 33%. This threshold is stable across market regimes and volatility levels, and reflects the ordinal structure of the dispatch problem. Furthermore, under reserve market constraints, FCR capacity revenue exceeds XBID by 6.5x per MW, making capacity allocation -- not forecast accuracy -- the primary driver of total revenue. In the Swiss market, hydrological surplus anomalies are significantly associated with balancing market revenue (p = 0.0005), a mechanism absent from existing German-focused literature. These findings reframe forecast evaluation for BESS operators: the relevant question is not what the MAE is, but whether the forecast achieves tau-sufficiency.

2026-04-13T21:42:59Z 32 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables. v2: added Section 3.5 (Note on Synthetic Forecast Generation) documenting variance attenuation in the alpha-interpolation method and robustness findings under rank-perturbation and Gaussian copula. Structural results unchanged Alessandro Falezza