Manipulation, Insider Information, and Regulation in Leveraged Event-Linked Markets

2026-05-11T12:44:29Z

The introduction of leverage on prediction-market event contracts raises three structurally distinct questions that have not been addressed jointly: how leverage changes manipulation incentives, how it interacts with informed-trading rents, and how regulatory frameworks should respond. This paper develops a theoretical framework for the first two and a synthesis of the existing regulatory landscape for the third. The principal analytical move is a two-axis manipulation taxonomy distinguishing market-price manipulation from real-world outcome manipulation, where the manipulator affects the underlying event itself. Continuous-underlying derivative markets generally do not make outcome manipulation a venue-level payoff channel; event-linked markets do. Within this taxonomy, leverage plays asymmetric roles: it scales market-price manipulation linearly but shifts the cost-benefit threshold for outcome manipulation, and it scales informed-trading rents in three ways (direct multiplication, Sharpe-ratio preservation, detection-cost amortization). Section 7 connects Paper 1's pre-emption and halt-protocol findings (CC-007b, CC-008) to three manipulation channels: pre-emption introduced by the dynamic-margin engine, halt-arbitrage introduced by the resolution-zone halt protocol, and strategic bad-debt-shifting that no engine in Paper 1's framework family addresses. The framework's manipulation-resistance contribution is a re-allocation of attack surface, not a net reduction. The regulatory synthesis covers principal jurisdictions (US, EU, UK, Singapore, offshore) and identifies three regulatory-arbitrage pathways. The paper concludes with 14 recommendations for venue operators, regulatory bodies, and the research community, separated into framework-independent and framework-conditional categories.

A Taxonomy of Event-Linked Perpetual Futures: Variant Designs Beyond the Single-Market Binary Case

2026-05-11T12:03:35Z

Paper 1 of this research programme develops a resolution-aware risk-design framework for the simplest event-linked perpetual: a contract whose underlying tracks a single binary prediction-market probability through resolution. The instrument class is broader. Variants span conditional probabilities P(A|B), spreads p^A - p^B, weighted baskets sum w_i p^(i), derivatives on variance or entropy of the probability process, contracts on liquidity itself, perpetual-on-expiring-event roll structures, and funding-only derivatives with no settlement. Each variant inherits some framework components from the single-market binary case and requires its own design adaptations. This paper develops a formal taxonomy of seven pure-form canonical variants beyond the probability-index perpetual of Paper 1, organised along four orthogonal design axes: underlying geometry, temporal structure, settlement structure, and venue composition. The list is not exhaustive; combinations are not treated separately. For each variant we provide a precise payoff definition; an inheritance map identifying which Paper 1 components carry over, are modified, or fail; variant-specific design constraints; microstructure properties; empirical evaluability on the PMXT v2 archive; and limitations. Notable findings: the conditional variant admits a candidate non-portability proposition (denominator instability as the conditioning event becomes improbable); the spread variant requires a three-channel decomposition of resolution risk; the volatility/entropy variant avoids random binary terminal-collapse but introduces estimator-convention and entropy-decay issues; the basket variant requires multi-period jump-aware margin whose aggregation is correlation-dependent. The paper is theoretical primarily; it specifies how demonstrative time series can be constructed and provides evaluability criteria to guide future work.

Resolution-Aware Perpetual Futures on Binary Prediction Markets: An Empirical Risk-Design Framework Using Polymarket Data

2026-05-11T11:41:44Z

We develop and counterfactually evaluate a resolution-aware risk-design framework (PIRAP) for perpetual futures whose underlying tracks a single binary prediction-market probability through resolution. The framework specifies six components: an index estimator combining mid-price, depth-weighted mid, and time-decayed VWAP; jump-aware tiered margin sized against bounded-event terminal-collapse magnitude; leverage compression schedule contracting toward resolution; resolution-aware funding rule with boundary-aware correction; a multi-stage halt protocol; and an eligibility framework. Two formal non-portability propositions establish that standard basis-only funding paired with continuous-vol static margin fails on bounded-event underlyings. Empirical evaluation uses Polymarket's PMXT v2 archive for 2026-04-21 to 2026-04-27 (13,298-market analysis sample passing adequacy gates from 61,087 ingested; 13,115 resolved within the empirical window for E3). E1 evaluates two pre-registered stylized facts; E2 conducts counterfactual replay across three engine configurations; E3 isolates the resolution-zone protocol's contribution. Results are mixed. Five pre-registered floors: stylized-fact floors (boundary depth asymmetry, terminal-jump magnitude) PASS; welfare-side directional floors (final-hour liquidation -6%, drawdown -5.1% pooled, median PnL +14%) two FAIL one PASS; E3 mechanic floors (final-hour liquidation -80% by halt construction PASS; bad-debt frequency +2.4% FAIL). Three of five materiality floors fail: the framework as specified does not validate deployment, but the empirical record establishes a halt-versus-margin scope distinction (halt addresses execution-channel risk; terminal-jump bad-debt remains margin-side) and documents a pre-emption trade-off constraining the dynamic-margin component. The paper concludes with structural recommendations and explicit non-deployable status.

The Invisible Handshake: Persistent Overpricing by Adaptive Market Agents

2026-05-11T11:35:20Z

We study overpricing in a repeated game between two representative agents: a market maker, who controls market liquidity, and a market taker, who chooses trade quantities. Market prices evolve through the endogenous price impact of trades and exogenous shocks. We define overpricing relative to a counterfactual price path that holds fixed the same sequence of shocks while shutting down price impact, and characterize the set of feasible strategy profiles that generate persistent overpricing while respecting cash and inventory constraints. We provide a sufficient condition for decentralized learning to reach the overpricing region in finite time, and we show that this condition is satisfied, in particular, by projected stochastic gradient ascent. A key step in the analysis is a decomposition of the game into a competitive component, which favors zero price impact, and a collaborative component, which makes overpricing jointly profitable when aggregate inventory is positive. We further show that the same structural incentives govern both myopic and farsighted objectives. Together, these results show how decentralized learning by adaptive market agents can lead to persistent overpricing in financial markets.

Game-Theoretic Modeling of Heterogeneous Investor Interactions for Stock Price Forecasting

2026-05-11T03:24:07Z

Accurate stock price forecasting has consistently remained a pivotal yet challenging FinTech task that underpins quantitative trading and investment decision making. Recent efforts have been dedicated to modeling various complex relationships among stocks in the stock market toward more reliable stock price forecasting.These methods depend heavily on strong static prior assumptions by modeling either temporal dependencies within individual stocks or spatial dependencies across different stocks based on predefined structures, while the complex market dynamics that drive stock price movements remain unexplored. To alleviate this issue, we propose a novel game-theoretic modeling method that captures heterogeneous investor interactions for stock price forecasting. The core idea is to embed game-theoretic mechanisms into the heterogeneous graph structure to finely model the dynamic strategic interactions among heterogeneous investors with respect to target stocks. Additionally, temporal positional encoding is adopted to reflect the differentiated influences of each game event at different time steps within the time window on future stock price movements. Leveraging heterogeneous graph networks, we proxy the intricate dynamics of the stock market through investor games and enable real-time information propagation and node updates among all nodes. Extensive experiments conducted on two real-world benchmark dataset demonstrate that our method effectively outperforms state-of-the-art stock price forecasting methods.

Estimation of an Order Book Dependent Hawkes Process for Large Datasets

2026-05-10T07:58:06Z

A point process for event arrivals in high frequency trading is presented. The intensity is the product of a Hawkes process and high dimensional functions of covariates derived from the order book. Conditions for stationarity of the process are stated. An algorithm is presented to estimate the model even in the presence of billions of data points, possibly mapping covariates into a high dimensional space. The large sample size can be common for high frequency data applications using multiple liquid instruments. Convergence of the algorithm is shown, consistency results under weak conditions is established, and a test statistic to assess out of sample performance of different model specifications is suggested. The methodology is applied to the study of four stocks that trade on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The out of sample testing procedure suggests that capturing the nonlinearity of the order book information adds value to the self exciting nature of high frequency trading events.

Who Restores the Peg? A Mean-Field Game Approach to Model Stablecoin Market Dynamics

2026-05-07T17:10:18Z

USDC and USDT are the dominant stablecoins pegged to \$1 with a total market capitalization of over \$300B and rising. Stablecoins make dollar value globally accessible with secure transfer and settlement. Yet in practice, these stablecoins experience periods of stress and de-pegging from their \$1 target, posing significant systemic risks. The behavior of market participants during these stress events and the collective actions that either restore or break the peg are not well understood. This paper addresses the question: who restores the peg?. We develop a dynamic, agent-based mean-field game framework for fiat-collateralized stablecoins, in which a large population of arbitrageurs and retail traders strategically interact across primary and secondary markets during a de-peg episode. The key advantage of this equilibrium formulation is that it endogenously maps market frictions into a market-clearing price path and implied net order flows, allowing us to attribute peg-reverting pressure by channel and to stress-test when a given infrastructure becomes insufficient for recovery. Using three historical de-peg events, we show that the calibrated equilibrium reproduces observed recovery half-lives and yields an order flow decomposition in which system-wide stress is predominantly stabilized by primary-market arbitrage. Finally, a quantitative sensitivity analysis identifies a non-linear breakdown threshold, beyond which a de-peg becomes markedly slower to reverse.

Dynamic Collateral Control for Permissionless Spot Perpetual Basis Trading

2026-05-06T16:24:08Z

We study permissionless spot--perpetual basis trading in decentralized finance as a collateral control problem. The strategy holds spot inventory, hedges directional exposure with a short perpetual, and allocates capital between spot inventory and derivative margin under on-chain liquidity and execution frictions. The paper delivers three results. First, it solves a static control problem for the collateral share and shows that the risk-constrained formulation provides a more robust operating benchmark relative to the economic optimum. In comparative calibration, the required collateral rises monotonically under volatility stress. The collateral is the lowest for BTC and increases significantly for long tail assets such as LINK and DOGE. Second, the paper derives an asymmetric dynamic extension in which the lower boundary of intervention is solvency driven, and the upper boundary is determined by a trade-off between carry-loss and the cost of rebalancing. Monte Carlo simulation shows that the lower boundary remains structurally relevant, whereas meaningful interior upper triggers survive mainly in the regimes with high carry and low costs. Third, the paper validates an execution-aware implementation with live routed execution and historical backtests. The execution layer shows that the realized wedges are significant, but become worse in the case of selling the basis. This justifies a minimum effective rebalancing size and a positive execution buffer. The historical validation shows that in the case of a fixed control rule the realized performance is predominantly explained by the funding environment.

Structural Limits of OHLCV-Based Intraday Signals in MNQ Futures: A Systematic Falsification Study

2026-05-05T17:24:54Z

This paper tests whether intraday momentum signals derived from open-high-low-close-volume (OHLCV) data produce a statistically significant trading edge in Micro E-mini Nasdaq 100 futures (MNQ) under realistic execution constraints. Using 947 trading days of five-minute data (2021-2025), fourteen signal families are evaluated, including opening range breakouts, gap strategies, volume signals, cross-session momentum, liquidity grabs, volatility-conditioned classifiers, and news-driven strategies. All signals are assessed using strict institutional criteria: out-of-sample walk-forward validation, minimum T-statistic of 2.0, at least 30 trades, positive net return after a fixed two-point round-trip cost, and multi-year stability. No signal satisfies all criteria simultaneously. The gross edge available to next-bar-open execution is constrained to approximately 0.07-1.50 points per trade, insufficient to overcome transaction costs. A gap-continuation signal achieves T = 3.23 and +14.52 points but fails minimum sample requirements (N = 22). Two validated signals from a separate research program are included as positive controls, confirming the methodology detects genuine edge when present. The primary contribution is a reproducible falsification framework and a documented null result, highlighting structural limits of OHLCV-based intraday strategies.

Trade Execution Flow as the Underlying Source of Market Dynamics

2026-05-05T17:04:34Z

In this work, we demonstrate experimentally that the execution flow, $I = dV/dt$, is the fundamental driving force of market dynamics. We develop a numerical framework to calculate execution flow from the data using the Radon-Nikodym derivative. A notable feature of this approach is its ability to automatically determine thresholds that can serve as actionable triggers. The technique also determines the characteristic time scale directly from the corresponding eigenproblem. The methodology has been validated on actual market data to support these findings. Additionally, we introduce a framework based on the Christoffel function spectrum, which is invariant under arbitrary non-degenerate linear transformations of input attributes and offers an alternative to traditional principal component analysis (PCA), which is limited to unitary invariance.

Optimal Trading in Automated Market Makers with Deep Learning

2026-05-05T14:15:23Z

This article explores the optimisation of trading strategies in Constant Function Market Makers (CFMMs) and centralised exchanges. We develop a model that accounts for the interaction between these two markets, estimating the conditional dependence between variables using the concept of conditional elicitability. Furthermore, we pose an optimal execution problem where the agent hides their orders by controlling the rate at which they trade. We do so without approximating the market dynamics. The resulting dynamic programming equation is not analytically tractable, therefore, we employ the deep Galerkin method to solve it. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments and illustrate that the optimal strategy is not prone to price slippage and outperforms naïve strategies.

Coordination as an Architectural Layer for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

2026-05-05T02:56:44Z

Multi-agent LLM systems fail in production at rates between 41% and 87%, mostly due to coordination defects rather than base-model capability. Existing responses split between cataloguing failure modes empirically and shipping declarative orchestration frameworks as engineering tools; neither delivers a principled mapping from coordination configuration to predictable failure-mode signature. We argue that coordination should be treated as a configurable architectural layer, separable from agent logic and from information access, enabling architectural reasoning rather than only engineering productivity. We instantiate this with an information-controlled design on prediction markets: a single LLM, fixed tools, fixed per-call output cap, and fixed prompt template across five reference coordination configurations, with total compute per question treated as an endogenous architectural output. The Murphy decomposition of the Brier score separates calibration from discriminative power, so configurations leave distinguishable signatures even when aggregate scores coincide. On 100 Polymarket binary markets resolved after the model's training cutoff (claude-opus-4-6) we report Murphy signatures, a cost-quality Pareto frontier, category-conditioned analysis, and a bootstrap power-projection. Three of five pre-specified predictions are upheld in direction; two configurations dominate the Pareto frontier within this regime; exploratory bootstrap intervals separate consensus alignment from others, though pairwise tests do not survive Bonferroni correction at n=100. We also deploy the same configurations as live agents on Foresight Arena under web-search-enabled conditions, as an on-chain replication channel accumulating in parallel. Harness, trace dataset, and production agents are released. We position this as a methodology-validating first instantiation, not a general cross-model claim.

Deepening the Secondary Market: Integrating Trade Credit into Market Clearing with the Cycles Protocol

2026-05-04T10:34:50Z

Current post-trade clearing systems rely almost exclusively on cash or cash-like collateral, leaving vast reserves of short-term liquidity embedded in trade credit outside formal settlement infrastructures. A key barrier to integrating this liquidity is the near-universal dependence of clearing services on novation, which imposes institutional overhead that restricts accessibility and limits the range of obligations that can be brought into settlement. This paper introduces the Cycles Protocol: a distributed, multilateral clearing mechanism based on double-entry accounting and atomic cycle execution that maximizes balance sheet compression. Unlike novation-based clearing, Cycles does not redistribute counterparty risk; it can thus be applied generally to existing financial networks, without any change in counterparty relations, allowing it to complement existing clearing systems and Central Counterparties (CCPs). By representing commitments as edges on a unified directed graph, Cycles surfaces liquidity hiding within existing network structure. We focus here on two applications of Cycles to deepening secondary market liquidity: first, as a compression layer between existing clearing participants and CCPs; and second, as a means to incorporate the liquidity of the trade credit network into formal settlement, extending market clearing beyond financial obligations and into real-economy financing.

TradeMech: A Method to Multilaterally Net Trades Without Altering Counterparty Exposure

2026-05-03T17:29:36Z

Financial markets such as bond, derivatives, and repo markets form networks of interdependent obligations. Existing multilateral netting methods typically trade off the extent of netting against preservation of counterparty exposure: central clearing reallocates exposure to a central counterparty, while trade compression may alter bilateral counterparty relationships. TradeMech is a mechanism for markets in which one or two homogeneous fungible objects are traded. The mechanism transforms a network of initial bilateral contracts into chains and cycles, nets the designated object multilaterally on those chains and cycles, and replaces initial contracts with multiparty contracts whose assigned trades remain fractions of the original bilateral trades. The construction achieves maximal multilateral netting of the designated object while preserving each agent's contractual profit and preserving the location of counterparty risk. When a party fails to pre-commit a required object, the affected assigned trade is recovered as a bilateral contract between the same original counterparties and the remaining assigned trades are re-netted on residual chains, so no new counterparty exposure is created.

First-passage horizons in horizontal visibility graphs: a rank-invariant estimator of path roughness for rough volatility models

2026-05-03T14:30:54Z

Horizontal visibility graphs (HVGs) encode the ordinal structure of time series and provide graph-local summaries of path topology. This article introduces L+(t), the forward visibility horizon at node t, with finite-sample terminal non-crossings treated as right-censored observations. For paths without ties, each uncensored L+(t) is identical to the first-passage time τ+(t) = inf{k â¥ 1 : x_{t+k} â¥ x_t}. For an i.i.d. sequence with a continuous distribution, the survival law is exactly Pr[L+ â¥ k] = 1/k, equivalent to Rényi's record statistic and implying infinite mean and variance. Hence roughness is estimated on a power-law survival scale through a single tail exponent θ. Combining the identity L+ = τ+ with discrete-grid persistence theory for fractional Brownian motion gives the prediction θ(H) = 1 â H. For rough Bergomi-type volatility, the same prediction is derived under an explicit persistence hypothesis for RiemannâLiouville fBm increments and verified numerically. In Monte-Carlo experiments (N = 10,000, T = 2^16), a Hill-MLE with ClausetâShaliziâNewman threshold selection recovers θ(H) within one cross-replicate standard deviation for H â¤ 0.2 and reveals a positive finite-size bias for smoother paths. The rank-invariant, parameter-free estimator separates rough Bergomi volatility from classical Heston, GARCH, and FIGARCH benchmarks. Applied to daily FRED VIX data from 2000â2026, the rolling estimate is θÌ = 0.91 Â± 0.19 across 45 four-year windows and lies far below an overlapping-window i.i.d. Monte-Carlo null (p < 0.001). The statistic offers an ordinal diagnostic of roughness for financial volatility and other complex time-series systems.