https://arxiv.org/api/g5LB4eZtGvmsT0TGO7IetPoQ3bQ2026-06-20T17:14:20Z226354015http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02302v2The Democratization of Wealth Management: Hedged Mutual Fund Blockchain Protocol2024-07-29T06:17:47ZWe develop several innovations to bring the best practices of traditional investment funds to the blockchain landscape. Specifically, we illustrate how: 1) fund prices can be updated regularly like mutual funds; 2) performance fees can be charged like hedge funds; 3) mutually hedged blockchain investment funds can operate with investor protection schemes, such as high water marks; and 4) measures to offset trading related slippage costs when redemptions happen. Using our concepts - and blockchain technology - traditional funds can calculate performance fees in a simplified manner and alleviate several operational issues. Blockchain can solve many problems for traditional finance, while tried and tested wealth management techniques can benefit decentralization, speeding its adoption. We provide detailed steps - including mathematical formulations and instructive pointers - to implement these ideas and discuss how our designs overcome several blockchain bottlenecks, making smart contracts smarter. We provide numerical illustrations of several scenarios related to our mechanisms.2024-03-12T11:16:35ZResearch in International Business and Finance, Volume 71, August 2024, 102487Ravi Kashyap10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102487http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.00113v2Loss-Versus-Fair: Efficiency of Dutch Auctions on Blockchains2024-07-26T18:11:44ZMilionis et al.(2023) studied the rate at which automated market makers leak value to arbitrageurs when block times are discrete and follow a Poisson process, and where the risky asset price follows a geometric Brownian motion. We extend their model to analyze another popular mechanism in decentralized finance for onchain trading: Dutch auctions. We compute the expected losses that a seller incurs to arbitrageurs and expected time-to-fill for Dutch auctions as a function of starting price, volatility, decay rate, and average interblock time. We also extend the analysis to gradual Dutch auctions, a variation on Dutch auctions for selling tokens over time at a continuous rate. We use these models to explore the tradeoff between speed of execution and quality of execution, which could help inform practitioners in setting parameters for starting price and decay rate on Dutch auctions, or help platform designers determine performance parameters like block times.2024-05-31T18:04:54ZCiamac C. MoallemiDan Robinsonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16885v1Automated Market Making and Decentralized Finance2024-07-23T23:38:19ZAutomated market makers (AMMs) are a new type of trading venues which are revolutionising the way market participants interact. At present, the majority of AMMs are constant function market makers (CFMMs) where a deterministic trading function determines how markets are cleared. Within CFMMs, we focus on constant product market makers (CPMMs) which implements the concentrated liquidity (CL) feature. In this thesis we formalise and study the trading mechanism of CPMMs with CL, and we develop liquidity provision and liquidity taking strategies. Our models are motivated and tested with market data.
We derive optimal strategies for liquidity takers (LTs) who trade orders of large size and execute statistical arbitrages. First, we consider an LT who trades in a CPMM with CL and uses the dynamics of prices in competing venues as market signals. We use Uniswap v3 data to study price, liquidity, and trading cost dynamics, and to motivate the model. Next, we consider an LT who trades a basket of crypto-currencies whose constituents co-move. We use market data to study lead-lag effects, spillover effects, and causality between trading venues.
We derive optimal strategies for strategic liquidity providers (LPs) who provide liquidity in CPMM with CL. First, we use stochastic control tools to derive a self-financing and closed-form optimal liquidity provision strategy where the width of the LP's liquidity range is determined by the profitability of the pool, the dynamics of the LP's position, and concentration risk. Next, we use a model-free approach to solve the problem of an LP who provides liquidity in multiple CPMMs with CL. We do not specify a model for the stochastic processes observed by LPs, and use a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to approximate the optimal liquidity provision strategy.2024-07-23T23:38:19ZDPhil thesis. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2307.03499Marcello Mongahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16780v1The Hybrid Forecast of S&P 500 Volatility ensembled from VIX, GARCH and LSTM models2024-07-23T18:28:16ZPredicting the S&P 500 index volatility is crucial for investors and financial analysts as it helps assess market risk and make informed investment decisions. Volatility represents the level of uncertainty or risk related to the size of changes in a security's value, making it an essential indicator for financial planning. This study explores four methods to improve the accuracy of volatility forecasts for the S&P 500: the established GARCH model, known for capturing historical volatility patterns; an LSTM network that utilizes past volatility and log returns; a hybrid LSTM-GARCH model that combines the strengths of both approaches; and an advanced version of the hybrid model that also factors in the VIX index to gauge market sentiment. This analysis is based on a daily dataset that includes S&P 500 and VIX index data, covering the period from January 3, 2000, to December 21, 2023. Through rigorous testing and comparison, we found that machine learning approaches, particularly the hybrid LSTM models, significantly outperform the traditional GARCH model. Including the VIX index in the hybrid model further enhances its forecasting ability by incorporating real-time market sentiment. The results of this study offer valuable insights for achieving more accurate volatility predictions, enabling better risk management and strategic investment decisions in the volatile environment of the S&P 500.2024-07-23T18:28:16Z38 pages, 18 figures, 14 tablesNatalia RoszykRobert Ślepaczukhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16527v1The Negative Drift of a Limit Order Fill2024-07-23T14:39:42ZMarket making refers to a form of trading in financial markets characterized by passive orders which add liquidity to limit order books. Market makers are important for the proper functioning of financial markets worldwide. Given the importance, financial mathematics has endeavored to derive optimal strategies for placing limit orders in this context. This paper identifies a key discrepancy between popular model assumptions and the realities of real markets, specifically regarding the dynamics around limit order fills. Traditionally, market making models rely on an assumption of low-cost random fills, when in reality we observe a high-cost non-random fill behavior. Namely, limit order fills are caused by and coincide with adverse price movements, which create a drag on the market maker's profit and loss. We refer to this phenomenon as "the negative drift" associated with limit order fills. We describe a discrete market model and prove theoretically that the negative drift exists. We also provide a detailed empirical simulation using one of the most traded financial instruments in the world, the 10 Year US Treasury Bond futures, which also confirms its existence. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to describe and prove this phenomenon in such detail.2024-07-23T14:39:42Z27 Pages, 6 FiguresTimothy DeLisehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15599v2Understanding the worst-kept secret of high-frequency trading2024-07-23T09:17:02ZVolume imbalance in a limit order book is often considered as a reliable indicator for predicting future price moves. In this work, we seek to analyse the nuances of the relationship between prices and volume imbalance. To this end, we study a market-making problem which allows us to view the imbalance as an optimal response to price moves. In our model, there is an underlying efficient price driving the mid-price, which follows the model with uncertainty zones. A single market maker knows the underlying efficient price and consequently the probability of a mid-price jump in the future. She controls the volumes she quotes at the best bid and ask prices. Solving her optimization problem allows us to understand endogenously the price-imbalance connection and to confirm in particular that it is optimal to quote a predictive imbalance. Our model can also be used by a platform to select a suitable tick size, which is known to be a crucial topic in financial regulation. The value function of the market maker's control problem can be viewed as a family of functions, indexed by the level of the market maker's inventory, solving a coupled system of PDEs. We show existence and uniqueness of classical solutions to this coupled system of equations. In the case of a continuous inventory, we also prove uniqueness of the market maker's optimal control policy.2023-07-28T14:59:59Z49 pagesSergio PulidoMathieu RosenbaumEmmanouil Sfendourakishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14844v1Political Leanings in Web3 Betting: Decoding the Interplay of Political and Profitable Motives2024-07-20T11:17:19ZHarnessing the transparent blockchain user behavior data, we construct the Political Betting Leaning Score (PBLS) to measure political leanings based on betting within Web3 prediction markets. Focusing on Polymarket and starting from the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, we synthesize behaviors over 15,000 addresses across 4,500 events and 8,500 markets, capturing the intensity and direction of their political leanings by the PBLS. We validate the PBLS through internal consistency checks and external comparisons. We uncover relationships between our PBLS and betting behaviors through over 800 features capturing various behavioral aspects. A case study of the 2022 U.S. Senate election further demonstrates the ability of our measurement while decoding the dynamic interaction between political and profitable motives. Our findings contribute to understanding decision-making in decentralized markets, enhancing the analysis of behaviors within Web3 prediction environments. The insights of this study reveal the potential of blockchain in enabling innovative, multidisciplinary studies and could inform the development of more effective online prediction markets, improve the accuracy of forecast, and help the design and optimization of platform mechanisms. The data and code for the paper are accessible at the following link: https://github.com/anonymous.2024-07-20T11:17:19ZHongzhou ChenXiaolin DuanAbdulmotaleb El SaddikWei Caihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13908v1Construction and Hedging of Equity Index Options Portfolios2024-07-18T21:49:04ZThis research presents a comprehensive evaluation of systematic index option-writing strategies, focusing on S&P500 index options. We compare the performance of hedging strategies using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) model and the Variance-Gamma (VG) model, emphasizing varying moneyness levels and different sizing methods based on delta and the VIX Index. The study employs 1-minute data of S&P500 index options and index quotes spanning from 2018 to 2023. The analysis benchmarks hedged strategies against buy-and-hold and naked option-writing strategies, with a focus on risk-adjusted performance metrics including transaction costs. Portfolio delta approximations are derived using implied volatility for the BSM model and market-calibrated parameters for the VG model. Key findings reveal that systematic option-writing strategies can potentially yield superior returns compared to buy-and-hold benchmarks. The BSM model generally provided better hedging outcomes than the VG model, although the VG model showed profitability in certain naked strategies as a tool for position sizing. In terms of rehedging frequency, we found that intraday hedging in 130-minute intervals provided both reliable protection against adverse market movements and a satisfactory returns profile.2024-07-18T21:49:04Z31 pages, 27 figures, 6 tablesMaciej WysockiRobert Ślepaczukhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06724v2Equity auction dynamics: latent liquidity models with activity acceleration2024-07-18T13:28:36ZEquity auctions display several distinctive characteristics in contrast to continuous trading. As the auction time approaches, the rate of events accelerates causing a substantial liquidity buildup around the indicative price. This, in turn, results in a reduced price impact and decreased volatility of the indicative price. In this study, we adapt the latent/revealed order book framework to the specifics of equity auctions. We provide precise measurements of the model parameters, including order submissions, cancellations, and diffusion rates. Our setup allows us to describe the full dynamics of the average order book during closing auctions in Euronext Paris. These findings support the relevance of the latent liquidity framework in describing limit order book dynamics. Lastly, we analyze the factors contributing to a sub-diffusive indicative price and demonstrate the absence of indicative price predictability.2024-01-12T17:49:16ZQuantitative Finance, 24(10), 1381--1398, 2024Mohammed SalekDamien ChalletIoane Muni Toke10.1080/14697688.2024.2367680http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11716v1No Questions Asked: Effects of Transparency on Stablecoin Liquidity During the Collapse of Silicon Valley Bank2024-07-16T13:33:57ZFiat-pegged stablecoins are by nature exposed to spillover effects during market turmoil in Traditional Finance (TradFi). We observe a difference in TradFi market shocks impact between various stablecoins, in particular, USD Coin (USDC) and Tether USDT (USDT), the former with a higher reporting frequency and transparency than the latter. We investigate this, using top USDC and USDT liquidity pools in Uniswap, by adapting the Marginal Cost of Immediacy (MCI) measure to Uniswap's Automated Market Maker, and then conducting Difference-in-Differences analysis on MCI and Total Value Locked (TVL) in USD, as well as measuring liquidity concentration across different providers. Results show that the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) event reduced USDC's TVL dominance over USDT, increased USDT's liquidity cost relative to USDC, and liquidity provision remained concentrated with pool-specific trends. These findings reveal a flight-to-safety behavior and counterintuitive effects of stablecoin transparency: USDC's frequent and detailed disclosures led to swift market reactions, while USDT's opacity and less frequent reporting provided a safety net against immediate impacts.2024-07-16T13:33:57ZWalter Hernandez CruzJiahua XuPaolo TascaCarlo Campajolahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08036v1Financial market geometry: The tube oscillator2024-07-10T20:33:16ZBased on geometrical considerations, we propose a new oscillator for technical market analysis, the tube oscillator. This oscillator measures the trending behavior of a fixed market instrument based on its past history. It is shown in an empirical analysis of the German DAX and the Forex EUR/USD exchange rate that a simple trading strategy based on this oscillator and fixed threshold leads to consistent positive monthly returns of average magnitude of 2% or more. The oscillator is derived from a broader understanding of the geometric behavior of prices throughout a fixed period, which we term financial market geometry. The remarkable profit results of the presented technique show that 1) prices of financial market instruments have a strong underlying deterministic component which can be detected and quantified with a matching approach and 2) financial market geometry is capable of providing such detectors.2024-07-10T20:33:16Z36 pages, 23 figuresDragoljub KaticStefan Richterhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18334v1A Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Algorithmic Trading of Bitcoin2024-07-09T13:07:43ZThis study evaluates the performance of 41 machine learning models, including 21 classifiers and 20 regressors, in predicting Bitcoin prices for algorithmic trading. By examining these models under various market conditions, we highlight their accuracy, robustness, and adaptability to the volatile cryptocurrency market. Our comprehensive analysis reveals the strengths and limitations of each model, providing critical insights for developing effective trading strategies. We employ both machine learning metrics (e.g., Mean Absolute Error, Root Mean Squared Error) and trading metrics (e.g., Profit and Loss percentage, Sharpe Ratio) to assess model performance. Our evaluation includes backtesting on historical data, forward testing on recent unseen data, and real-world trading scenarios, ensuring the robustness and practical applicability of our models. Key findings demonstrate that certain models, such as Random Forest and Stochastic Gradient Descent, outperform others in terms of profit and risk management. These insights offer valuable guidance for traders and researchers aiming to leverage machine learning for cryptocurrency trading.2024-07-09T13:07:43ZAbdul JabbarSyed Qaisar Jalilhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05146v1Unified Approach for Hedging Impermanent Loss of Liquidity Provision2024-07-06T18:12:11ZWe develop static and dynamic approaches for hedging of the impermanent loss (IL) of liquidity provision (LP) staked at Decentralised Exchanges (DEXes) which employ Uniswap V2 and V3 protocols. We provide detailed definitions and formulas for computing the IL to unify different definitions occurring in the existing literature. We show that the IL can be seen a contingent claim with a non-linear payoff for a fixed maturity date. Thus, we introduce the contingent claim termed as IL protection claim which delivers the negative of IL payoff at the maturity date. We apply arbitrage-based methods for valuation and risk management of this claim. First, we develop the static model-independent replication method for the valuation of IL protection claim using traded European vanilla call and put options. We extend and generalize an existing method to show that the IL protection claim can be hedged perfectly with options if there is a liquid options market. Second, we develop the dynamic model-based approach for the valuation and hedging of IL protection claims under a risk-neutral measure. We derive analytic valuation formulas using a wide class of price dynamics for which the characteristic function is available under the risk-neutral measure. As base cases, we derive analytic valuation formulas for IL protection claim under the Black-Scholes-Merton model and the log-normal stochastic volatility model. We finally discuss estimation of risk-reward of LP staking using our results.2024-07-06T18:12:11Z34 pages, 8 figuresAlexander LiptonVladimir LucicArtur Sepphttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04510v1Unwinding Toxic Flow with Partial Information2024-07-05T13:52:17ZWe consider a central trading desk which aggregates the inflow of clients' orders with unobserved toxicity, i.e. persistent adverse directionality. The desk chooses either to internalise the inflow or externalise it to the market in a cost effective manner. In this model, externalising the order flow creates both price impact costs and an additional market feedback reaction for the inflow of trades. The desk's objective is to maximise the daily trading P&L subject to end of the day inventory penalization. We formulate this setting as a partially observable stochastic control problem and solve it in two steps. First, we derive the filtered dynamics of the inventory and toxicity, projected to the observed filtration, which turns the stochastic control problem into a fully observed problem. Then we use a variational approach in order to derive the unique optimal trading strategy. We illustrate our results for various scenarios in which the desk is facing momentum and mean-reverting toxicity. Our implementation shows that the P&L performance gap between the partially observable problem and the full information case are of order $0.01\%$ in all tested scenarios.2024-07-05T13:52:17Z52 pages, 10 figuresAlexander BarzykinRobert BoyceEyal Neumanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02236v1Indian Stock Market Prediction using Augmented Financial Intelligence ML2024-07-02T12:58:50ZThis paper presents price prediction models using Machine Learning algorithms augmented with Superforecasters predictions, aimed at enhancing investment decisions. Five Machine Learning models are built, including Bidirectional LSTM, ARIMA, a combination of CNN and LSTM, GRU, and a model built using LSTM and GRU algorithms. The models are evaluated using the Mean Absolute Error to determine their predictive accuracy. Additionally, the paper suggests incorporating human intelligence by identifying Superforecasters and tracking their predictions to anticipate unpredictable shifts or changes in stock prices . The predictions made by these users can further enhance the accuracy of stock price predictions when combined with Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing techniques. Predicting the price of any commodity can be a significant task but predicting the price of a stock in the stock market deals with much more uncertainty. Recognising the limited knowledge and exposure to stocks among certain investors, this paper proposes price prediction models using Machine Learning algorithms. In this work, five Machine learning models are built using Bidirectional LSTM, ARIMA, a combination of CNN and LSTM, GRU and the last one is built using LSTM and GRU algorithms. Later these models are assessed using MAE scores to find which model is predicting with the highest accuracy. In addition to this, this paper also suggests the use of human intelligence to closely predict the shift in price patterns in the stock market The main goal is to identify Superforecasters and track their predictions to anticipate unpredictable shifts or changes in stock prices. By leveraging the combined power of Machine Learning and the Human Intelligence, predictive accuracy can be significantly increased.2024-07-02T12:58:50ZKeywords: Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, LSTM, GRU, ARMA, CNN, NLP, ANN, SVM, BSE, NIFTY, MAE, MSE, BiLSTM . Published in SSRN JournalAnishka ChauhanPratham MayurYeshwanth Sai GokarakondaPooriya JamieNaman Mehrotra10.2139/ssrn.4697853