https://arxiv.org/api/cpzDnhh8KTQC32UJBKFNFXhDcsw2026-04-05T13:17:19Z217628515http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14129v3Macroscopic Market Making2025-04-06T03:37:23ZWe propose a macroscopic market making model à la Avellaneda-Stoikov, using continuous processes for orders instead of discrete point processes. The model intends to bridge the gap between market making and optimal execution problems, while shedding light on the influence of order flows on the optimal strategies. We demonstrate our model through three problems. The study provides a comprehensive analysis from Markovian to non-Markovian noises and from linear to non-linear intensity functions, encompassing both bounded and unbounded coefficients. Mathematically, the contribution lies in the existence and uniqueness of the optimal control, guaranteed by the well-posedness of the strong solution to the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation and the (non-)Lipschitz forward-backward stochastic differential equation. Finally, the model's applications to price impact and optimal execution are discussed.2023-07-26T11:52:11ZThis version includes applications and numerical examplesIvan GuoShijia JinKihun Namhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18199v2Generating realistic metaorders from public data2025-04-05T10:39:47ZThis paper introduces a novel algorithm for generating realistic metaorders from public trade data, addressing a longstanding challenge in price impact research that has traditionally relied on proprietary datasets. Our method effectively recovers all established stylized facts of metaorders impact, such as the Square Root Law, the concave profile during metaorder execution, and the post-execution decay. This algorithm not only overcomes the dependence on proprietary data, a major barrier to research reproducibility, but also enables the creation of larger and more robust datasets that may increase the quality of empirical studies. Our findings strongly suggest that average realized short-term price impact is not due to information revelation (as in the Kyle framework) but has a mechanical origin which could explain the universality of the Square Root Law.2025-03-23T20:47:24ZGuillaume MaitrierGrégoire LoeperJean-Philippe Bouchaudhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03311v1Information Leakages in the Green Bond Market2025-04-04T09:46:15ZPublic announcement dates are used in the green bond literature to measure equity market reactions to upcoming green bond issues. We find a sizeable number of green bond announcements were pre-dated by anonymous information leakages on the Bloomberg Terminal. From a candidate set of 2,036 'Bloomberg News' and 'Bloomberg First Word' headlines gathered between 2016 and 2022, we identify 259 instances of green bond-related information being released before being publicly announced by the issuing firm. These pre-announcement leaks significantly alter the equity trading dynamics of the issuing firms over intraday and daily event windows. Significant negative abnormal returns and increased trading volumes are observed following news leaks about upcoming green bond issues. These negative investor reactions are concentrated amongst financial firms, and leaks that arrive pre-market or early in market trading. We find equity price movements following news leaks can be explained to a greater degree than following public announcements. Sectoral differences are also observed in the key drivers behind investor reactions to green bond leaks by non-financials (Tobin's Q and free cash flow) and financials (ROA). Our results suggest that information leakages have a strong impact on market behaviour, and should be accounted for in green bond literature. Our findings also have broader ramifications for financial literature going forward. Privileged access to financially material information, courtesy of the ubiquitous use of Bloomberg Terminals by professional investors, highlights the need for event studies to consider wider sets of communication channels to confirm the date at which information first becomes available.2025-04-04T09:46:15Z44 pages, 4 figures, 11 tablesDarren ShannonJin GongBarry Sheehanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17712v2Broker-Trader Partial Information Nash-Equilibria2025-04-01T18:12:59ZWe study partial information Nash equilibrium between a broker and an informed trader. In this setting, the informed trader, who possesses knowledge of a trading signal, trades multiple assets with the broker in a dealer market. Simultaneously, the broker offloads these assets in a lit exchange where their actions impact the asset prices. The broker, however, only observes aggregate prices and cannot distinguish between underlying trends and volatility. Both the broker and the informed trader aim to maximize their penalized expected wealth. Using convex analysis, we characterize the Nash equilibrium and demonstrate its existence and uniqueness. Furthermore, we establish that this equilibrium corresponds to the solution of a nonstandard system of forward-backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs) that involves the two differing filtrations. For short enough time horizons, we prove that a unique solution of this system exists. Finally, under quite general assumptions, we show that the solution to the FBSDE system admits a polynomial approximation in the strength of the transient impact to arbitrary order, and prove that the error is controlled.2024-12-23T16:45:01ZXuchen WuSebastian Jaimungalhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01352v2Mean field equilibrium asset pricing model under partial observation: An exponential quadratic Gaussian approach2025-04-01T05:29:00ZThis paper studies an asset pricing model in a partially observable market with a large number of heterogeneous agents using the mean field game theory. In this model, we assume that investors can only observe stock prices and must infer the risk premium from these observations when determining trading strategies. We characterize the equilibrium risk premium in such a market through a solution to the mean field backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE). Specifically, the solution to the mean field BSDE can be expressed semi-analytically by employing an exponential quadratic Gaussian framework. We then construct the risk premium process, which cannot be observed directly by investors, endogenously using the Kalman-Bucy filtering theory. In addition, we include a simple numerical simulation to visualize the dynamics of our market model.2024-10-02T09:09:34ZForthcoming in Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics. 22 pages, 5 figuresMasashi Sekinehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08757v2Strategic Informed Trading and the Value of Private Information2025-03-31T19:32:22ZWe consider a market of risky financial assets whose participants are an informed trader, a representative uninformed trader, and noisy liquidity providers. We prove the existence of a market-clearing equilibrium when the insider internalizes her power to impact prices, but the uninformed trader takes prices as given. Compared to the associated competitive economy, in equilibrium the insider strategically reveals a noisier signal, and prices are less reactive to publicly available information. Additionally, and in direct contrast to the related literature, in equilibrium the insider's indirect utility monotonically increases in the signal precision. Therefore, the insider is motivated not only to obtain, but also to refine, her signal. Lastly, we show that compared to the competitive economy, the insider's internalization of price impact is utility improving for the uninformed trader, but somewhat surprisingly may be utility decreasing for the insider herself. This utility reduction occurs provided the insider is sufficiently risk averse compared to the uninformed trader, and provided the signal is of sufficiently low quality.2024-04-12T18:29:25Z37 pages, 3 figuresMichail AnthropelosScott Robertsonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05803v4Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Crypto Wash Trading2025-03-31T03:31:09ZWe develop a new framework to detect wash trading in crypto assets through real-time liquidity fluctuation. We propose that short-term price jumps in crypto assets results from wash trading-induced liquidity fluctuation, and construct two complementary liquidity measures, liquidity jump (size of fluctuation) and liquidity diffusion (volatility of fluctuation), to capture the behavioral signature of wash trading. Using US stocks as a benchmark, we demonstrate that joint elevation in both liquidity metrics indicates wash trading in crypto assets. A simulated regulatory treatment that removes likely wash trades confirms this dynamic: it reduces liquidity diffusion significantly while leaving liquidity jump largely unaffected. These findings align with a theoretical model in which manipulative traders amplify both the level and variance of price pressure, whereas passive investors affect only the level. Our model offers practical tools for investors to assess market quality and for regulators to monitor manipulation risk on crypto exchanges without oversight.2024-10-28T11:58:38ZQi DengZhong-Guo Zhouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10743v2From Glosten-Milgrom to the whole limit order book and applications to financial regulation2025-03-29T15:41:53ZWe build an agent-based model for the order book with three types of market participants: informed trader, noise trader and competitive market makers. Using a Glosten-Milgrom like approach, we are able to deduce the whole limit order book (bid-ask spread and volume available at each price) from the interactions between the different agents. More precisely, we obtain a link between efficient price dynamic, proportion of trades due to the noise trader, traded volume, bid-ask spread and equilibrium limit order book state. With this model, we provide a relevant tool for regulators and market platforms. We show for example that it allows us to forecast consequences of a tick size change on the microstructure of an asset. It also enables us to value quantitatively the queue position of a limit order in the book.2019-02-27T19:28:35ZWeibing HuangSergio PulidoMathieu RosenbaumPamela SalibaEmmanouil Sfendourakishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13794v2Adaptive Curves for Optimally Efficient Market Making2025-03-29T03:14:40ZAutomated Market Makers (AMMs) are essential in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) as they match liquidity supply with demand. They function through liquidity providers (LPs) who deposit assets into liquidity pools. However, the asset trading prices in these pools often trail behind those in more dynamic, centralized exchanges, leading to potential arbitrage losses for LPs. This issue is tackled by adapting market maker bonding curves to trader behavior, based on the classical market microstructure model of Glosten and Milgrom. Our approach ensures a zero-profit condition for the market maker's prices. We derive the differential equation that an optimal adaptive curve should follow to minimize arbitrage losses while remaining competitive. Solutions to this optimality equation are obtained for standard Gaussian and Lognormal price models using Kalman filtering. A key feature of our method is its ability to estimate the external market price without relying on price or loss oracles. We also provide an equivalent differential equation for the implied dynamics of canonical static bonding curves and establish conditions for their optimality. Our algorithms demonstrate robustness to changing market conditions and adversarial perturbations, and we offer an on-chain implementation using Uniswap v4 alongside off-chain AI co-processors.2024-06-19T19:42:38ZViraj NadkarniSanjeev KulkarniPramod Viswanathhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22502v1Equilibrium Reward for Liquidity Providers in Automated Market Makers2025-03-28T15:07:02ZWe find the equilibrium contract that an automated market maker (AMM) offers to their strategic liquidity providers (LPs) in order to maximize the order flow that gets processed by the venue. Our model is formulated as a leader-follower stochastic game, where the venue is the leader and a representative LP is the follower. We derive approximate closed-form equilibrium solutions to the stochastic game and analyze the reward structure. Our findings suggest that under the equilibrium contract, LPs have incentives to add liquidity to the pool only when higher liquidity on average attracts more noise trading. The equilibrium contract depends on the external price, the pool reference price, and the pool reserves. Our framework offers insights into AMM design for maximizing order flow while ensuring LP profitability.2025-03-28T15:07:02ZAlif AqshaPhilippe BergaultLeandro Sánchez-Betancourthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21422v1From Deep Learning to LLMs: A survey of AI in Quantitative Investment2025-03-27T12:10:15ZQuantitative investment (quant) is an emerging, technology-driven approach in asset management, increasingy shaped by advancements in artificial intelligence. Recent advances in deep learning and large language models (LLMs) for quant finance have improved predictive modeling and enabled agent-based automation, suggesting a potential paradigm shift in this field. In this survey, taking alpha strategy as a representative example, we explore how AI contributes to the quantitative investment pipeline. We first examine the early stage of quant research, centered on human-crafted features and traditional statistical models with an established alpha pipeline. We then discuss the rise of deep learning, which enabled scalable modeling across the entire pipeline from data processing to order execution. Building on this, we highlight the emerging role of LLMs in extending AI beyond prediction, empowering autonomous agents to process unstructured data, generate alphas, and support self-iterative workflows.2025-03-27T12:10:15ZBokai CaoSaizhuo WangXinyi LinXiaojun WuHaohan ZhangLionel M. NiJian Guohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06281v1QubitSwap: The Informational Edge in Decentralised Exchanges2025-03-24T06:13:40ZDecentralised exchanges (DEXs) have transformed trading by enabling trustless, permissionless transactions, yet they face significant challenges such as impermanent loss and slippage, which undermine profitability for liquidity providers and traders. In this paper, we introduce QubitSwap, an innovative DEX model designed to tackle these issues through a hybrid approach that integrates an external oracle price with internal pool dynamics. This is achieved via a parameter $z$, which governs the balance between these price sources, creating a flexible and adaptive pricing mechanism. Through rigorous mathematical analysis, we derive a novel reserve function and pricing model that substantially reduces impermanent loss and slippage compared to traditional DEX frameworks. Notably, our results show that as $z$ approaches 1, slippage approaches zero, enhancing trading stability. QubitSwap marks a novel approach in DEX design, delivering a more efficient and resilient platform. This work not only advances the theoretical foundations of decentralised finance but also provides actionable solutions for the broader DeFi ecosystem.2025-03-24T06:13:40Z7 pages, 3 figuresOliver Tronn Scott-SimonsChris Colman FrostBytehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18096v1Informer in Algorithmic Investment Strategies on High Frequency Bitcoin Data2025-03-23T15:00:13ZThe article investigates the usage of Informer architecture for building automated trading strategies for high frequency Bitcoin data. Three strategies using Informer model with different loss functions: Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Generalized Mean Absolute Directional Loss (GMADL) and Quantile loss, are proposed and evaluated against the Buy and Hold benchmark and two benchmark strategies based on technical indicators. The evaluation is conducted using data of various frequencies: 5 minute, 15 minute, and 30 minute intervals, over the 6 different periods. Although the Informer-based model with Quantile loss did not outperform the benchmark, two other models achieved better results. The performance of the model using RMSE loss worsens when used with higher frequency data while the model that uses novel GMADL loss function is benefiting from higher frequency data and when trained on 5 minute interval it beat all the other strategies on most of the testing periods. The primary contribution of this study is the application and assessment of the RMSE, GMADL, and Quantile loss functions with the Informer model to forecast future returns, subsequently using these forecasts to develop automated trading strategies. The research provides evidence that employing an Informer model trained with the GMADL loss function can result in superior trading outcomes compared to the buy-and-hold approach.2025-03-23T15:00:13Z41 pages, 17 figures, 19 tablesFilip StefaniukRobert Ślepaczukhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18005v1A Simple Strategy to Deal with Toxic Flow2025-03-23T09:39:18ZWe model the trading activity between a broker and her clients (informed and uninformed traders) as an infinite-horizon stochastic control problem. We derive the broker's optimal dealing strategy in closed form and use this to introduce an algorithm that bypasses the need to calibrate individual parameters, so the dealing strategy can be executed in real-world trading environments. Finally, we characterise the discount in the price of liquidity a broker offers clients. The discount strikes the optimal balance between maximising the order flow from the broker's clients and minimising adverse selection losses to the informed traders.2025-03-23T09:39:18ZÁlvaro CarteaLeandro Sánchez-Betancourthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01241v2Position building in competition is a game with incomplete information2025-03-22T15:28:20ZThis paper examines strategic trading under incomplete information, where firms lack full knowledge of key aspects of their competitors' trading strategies such as target sizes and market impact models. We extend previous work on competitive trading equilibria by incorporating uncertainty through the framework of Bayesian games. This allows us to analyze scenarios where firms have diverse beliefs about market conditions and each other's strategies. We derive optimal trading strategies in this setting and demonstrate how uncertainty significantly impacts these strategies compared to the complete information case.
Furthermore, we introduce a novel approach to model the presence of non-strategic traders, even when strategic firms disagree on their characteristics. Our analysis reveals the complex interplay of beliefs and strategic adjustments required in such an environment. Finally, we discuss limitations of the current model, including the reliance on linear market impact and the lack of dynamic strategy adjustments, outlining directions for future research.2025-01-02T13:00:14Z35 pages, 8 figuresNeil A. Chriss