https://arxiv.org/api/o/nq0BbglPUrtwu1aZ0ySzu8LZI2026-04-01T09:00:32Z217424015http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03499v3Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Execution and Speculation2025-06-17T21:18:33ZAutomated market makers (AMMs) are a new prototype of decentralised exchanges which are revolutionising market interactions. The majority of AMMs are constant product markets (CPMs) where exchange rates are set by a trading function. This work studies optimal trading and statistical arbitrage in CPMs where balancing exchange rate risk and execution costs is key. Empirical evidence shows that execution costs are accurately estimated by the convexity of the trading function. These convexity costs are linear in the trade size and are nonlinear in the depth of liquidity and in the exchange rate. We develop models for when exchange rates form in a competing centralised exchange, in a CPM, or in both venues. Finally, we derive computationally efficient strategies that account for stochastic convexity costs and we showcase their out-of-sample performance.2023-07-07T10:25:59ZForthcoming in Journal of Economic Dynamics and ControlÁlvaro CarteaFayçal DrissiMarcello Mongahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13993v2Market Making without Regret2025-06-17T07:56:29ZWe consider a sequential decision-making setting where, at every round $t$, a market maker posts a bid price $B_t$ and an ask price $A_t$ to an incoming trader (the taker) with a private valuation for one unit of some asset. If the trader's valuation is lower than the bid price, or higher than the ask price, then a trade (sell or buy) occurs. If a trade happens at round $t$, then letting $M_t$ be the market price (observed only at the end of round $t$), the maker's utility is $M_t - B_t$ if the maker bought the asset, and $A_t - M_t$ if they sold it. We characterize the maker's regret with respect to the best fixed choice of bid and ask pairs under a variety of assumptions (adversarial, i.i.d., and their variants) on the sequence of market prices and valuations. Our upper bound analysis unveils an intriguing connection relating market making to first-price auctions and dynamic pricing. Our main technical contribution is a lower bound for the i.i.d. case with Lipschitz distributions and independence between prices and valuations. The difficulty in the analysis stems from the unique structure of the reward and feedback functions, allowing an algorithm to acquire information by graduating the "cost of exploration" in an arbitrary way.2024-11-21T10:13:55ZNicolò Cesa-BianchiTommaso CesariRoberto ColomboniLuigi FoscariVinayak Pathakhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09172v2LOB-Bench: Benchmarking Generative AI for Finance -- an Application to Limit Order Book Data2025-06-16T14:02:28ZWhile financial data presents one of the most challenging and interesting sequence modelling tasks due to high noise, heavy tails, and strategic interactions, progress in this area has been hindered by the lack of consensus on quantitative evaluation paradigms. To address this, we present LOB-Bench, a benchmark, implemented in python, designed to evaluate the quality and realism of generative message-by-order data for limit order books (LOB) in the LOBSTER format. Our framework measures distributional differences in conditional and unconditional statistics between generated and real LOB data, supporting flexible multivariate statistical evaluation. The benchmark also includes features commonly used LOB statistics such as spread, order book volumes, order imbalance, and message inter-arrival times, along with scores from a trained discriminator network. Lastly, LOB-Bench contains "market impact metrics", i.e. the cross-correlations and price response functions for specific events in the data. We benchmark generative autoregressive state-space models, a (C)GAN, as well as a parametric LOB model and find that the autoregressive GenAI approach beats traditional model classes.2025-02-13T10:56:58ZProceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Vancouver, Canada. PMLR 267, 2025Peer NagySascha FreyKang LiBidipta SarkarSvitlana VyetrenkoStefan ZohrenAni CalinescuJakob Foersterhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12281v1A New Approach for the Continuous Time Kyle-Back Strategic Insider Equilibrium Problem2025-06-14T00:06:16ZThis paper considers a continuous time Kyle-Back model which is a game problem between an insider and a market marker. The existing literature typically focuses on the existence of equilibrium by using the PDE approach, which requires certain Markovian structure and the equilibrium is in the bridge form. We shall provide a new approach which is used widely for stochastic controls and stochastic differential games. We characterize all equilibria through a coupled system of forward backward SDEs, where the forward one is the conditional law of the inside information and the backward one is the insider's optimal value. In particular, when the time duration is small, we show that the FBSDE is wellposed and thus the game has a unique equilibrium. This is the first uniqueness result in the literature, without restricting the equilibria to certain special structure. Moreover, this unique equilibrium may not be Markovian, indicating that the PDE approach cannot work in this case. We next study the set value of the game, which roughly speaking is the set of insider's values over all equilibria and thus is by nature unique. We show that, although the bridge type of equilibria in the literature does not satisfy the required integrability for our equilibria, its truncation serves as a desired approximate equilibrium and its value belongs to our set value. Finally, we characterize our set value through a level set of certain standard HJB equation.2025-06-14T00:06:16ZBixing QiaoJianfeng Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11921v1Dynamic Grid Trading Strategy: From Zero Expectation to Market Outperformance2025-06-13T16:11:44ZWe propose a profitable trading strategy for the cryptocurrency market based on grid trading. Starting with an analysis of the expected value of the traditional grid strategy, we show that under simple assumptions, its expected return is essentially zero. We then introduce a novel Dynamic Grid-based Trading (DGT) strategy that adapts to market conditions by dynamically resetting grid positions. Our backtesting results using minute-level data from Bitcoin and Ethereum between January 2021 and July 2024 demonstrate that the DGT strategy significantly outperforms both the traditional grid and buy-and-hold strategies in terms of internal rate of return and risk control.2025-06-13T16:11:44Z7 pages, 8 figures. Code available at https://github.com/colachenkc/Dynamic-Grid-TradingKai-Yuan ChenKai-Hsin ChenJyh-Shing Roger Janghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11843v1Multi-dimensional queue-reactive model and signal-driven models: a unified framework2025-06-13T14:45:51ZWe present a Markovian market model driven by a hidden Brownian efficient price. In particular, we extend the queue-reactive model, making its dynamics dependent on the efficient price. Our study focuses on two sub-models: a signal-driven price model where the mid-price jump rates depend on the efficient price and an observable signal, and the usual queue-reactive model dependent on the efficient price via the intensities of the order arrivals. This way, we are able to correlate the evolution of limit order books of different stocks. We prove the stability of the observed mid-price around the efficient price under natural assumptions. Precisely, we show that at the macroscopic scale, prices behave as diffusions. We also develop a maximum likelihood estimation procedure for the model, and test it numerically. Our model is them used to backest trading strategies in a liquidation context.2025-06-13T14:45:51Z33 pagesEmmanouil Sfendourakishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11813v1Optimal Execution under Liquidity Uncertainty2025-06-13T14:17:31ZWe study an optimal execution strategy for purchasing a large block of shares over a fixed time horizon. The execution problem is subject to a general price impact that gradually dissipates due to market resilience. This resilience is modeled through a potentially arbitrary limit-order book shape. To account for liquidity dynamics, we introduce a stochastic volume effect governing the recovery of the deviation process, which represents the difference between the impacted and unaffected price. Additionally, we incorporate stochastic liquidity variations through a regime-switching Markov chain to capture abrupt shifts in market conditions. We study this singular control problem, where the trader optimally determines the timing and rate of purchases to minimize execution costs. The associated value function to this optimization problem is shown to satisfy a system of variational Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman inequalities. Moreover, we establish that it is the unique viscosity solution to this HJB system and study the analytical properties of the free boundary separating the execution and continuation regions. To illustrate our results, we present numerical examples under different limit-order book configurations, highlighting the interplay between price impact, resilience dynamics, and stochastic liquidity regimes in shaping the optimal execution strategy.2025-06-13T14:17:31ZEtienne ChevalierYadh HafsiVathana Ly VathSergio Pulidohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06928v2FinTSBridge: A New Evaluation Suite for Real-world Financial Prediction with Advanced Time Series Models2025-06-11T15:26:46ZDespite the growing attention to time series forecasting in recent years, many studies have proposed various solutions to address the challenges encountered in time series prediction, aiming to improve forecasting performance. However, effectively applying these time series forecasting models to the field of financial asset pricing remains a challenging issue. There is still a need for a bridge to connect cutting-edge time series forecasting models with financial asset pricing. To bridge this gap, we have undertaken the following efforts: 1) We constructed three datasets from the financial domain; 2) We selected over ten time series forecasting models from recent studies and validated their performance in financial time series; 3) We developed new metrics, msIC and msIR, in addition to MSE and MAE, to showcase the time series correlation captured by the models; 4) We designed financial-specific tasks for these three datasets and assessed the practical performance and application potential of these forecasting models in important financial problems. We hope the developed new evaluation suite, FinTSBridge, can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and robustness of advanced forecasting models in finanical domains.2025-03-10T05:19:13ZICLR 2025 Workshop Advances in Financial AIYanlong WangJian XuTiantian GaoHongkang ZhangShao-Lun HuangDanny Dongning SunXiao-Ping Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08992v1Optimal hedging of an informed broker facing many traders2025-06-10T17:04:39ZThis paper investigates the optimal hedging strategies of an informed broker interacting with multiple traders in a financial market. We develop a theoretical framework in which the broker, possessing exclusive information about the drift of the asset's price, engages with traders whose trading activities impact the market price. Using a mean-field game approach, we derive the equilibrium strategies for both the broker and the traders, illustrating the intricate dynamics of their interactions. The broker's optimal strategy involves a Stackelberg equilibrium, where the broker leads and the traders follow. Our analysis also addresses the mean field limit of finite-player models and shows the convergence to the mean-field solution as the number of traders becomes large.2025-06-10T17:04:39ZPhilippe BergaultPierre CardaliaguetWenbin Yanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08718v1Price Discovery in Cryptocurrency Markets2025-06-10T12:07:11ZThis document analyzes price discovery in cryptocurrency markets by comparing centralized and decentralized exchanges, as well as spot and futures markets. The study focuses first on Ethereum (ETH) and then applies a similar approach to Bitcoin (BTC). Chapter 1 outlines the theoretical framework, emphasizing the structural differences between centralized exchanges and decentralized finance mechanisms, especially Automated Market Makers (AMMs). It also explains how to construct an order book from a liquidity pool in a decentralized setting for comparison with centralized exchanges. Chapter 2 describes the methodological tools used: Hasbrouck's Information Share, Gonzalo and Granger's Permanent-Transitory decomposition, and the Hayashi-Yoshida estimator. These are applied to explore lead-lag dynamics, cointegration, and price discovery across market types. Chapter 3 presents the empirical analysis. For ETH, it compares price dynamics on Binance and Uniswap v2 over a one-year period, focusing on five key events in 2024. For BTC, it analyzes the relationship between spot and futures prices on the CME. The study estimates lead-lag effects and cointegration in both cases. Results show that centralized markets typically lead in ETH price discovery. In futures markets, while they tend to lead overall, high-volatility periods produce mixed outcomes. The findings have key implications for traders and institutions regarding liquidity, arbitrage, and market efficiency. Various metrics are used to benchmark the performance of modified AMMs and to understand the interaction between decentralized and centralized structures.2025-06-10T12:07:11ZJuan Plazuelo PascualCarlos Tardon RubioJuan Toro CebadaAngel Hernando Vecianahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05764v2Exploring Microstructural Dynamics in Cryptocurrency Limit Order Books: Better Inputs Matter More Than Stacking Another Hidden Layer2025-06-09T22:37:07ZCryptocurrency price dynamics are driven largely by microstructural supply demand imbalances in the limit order book (LOB), yet the highly noisy nature of LOB data complicates the signal extraction process. Prior research has demonstrated that deep-learning architectures can yield promising predictive performance on pre-processed equity and futures LOB data, but they often treat model complexity as an unqualified virtue. In this paper, we aim to examine whether adding extra hidden layers or parameters to "blackbox ish" neural networks genuinely enhances short term price forecasting, or if gains are primarily attributable to data preprocessing and feature engineering. We benchmark a spectrum of models from interpretable baselines, logistic regression, XGBoost to deep architectures (DeepLOB, Conv1D+LSTM) on BTC/USDT LOB snapshots sampled at 100 ms to multi second intervals using publicly available Bybit data. We introduce two data filtering pipelines (Kalman, Savitzky Golay) and evaluate both binary (up/down) and ternary (up/flat/down) labeling schemes. Our analysis compares models on out of sample accuracy, latency, and robustness to noise. Results reveal that, with data preprocessing and hyperparameter tuning, simpler models can match and even exceed the performance of more complex networks, offering faster inference and greater interpretability.2025-06-06T05:43:30ZHaochuan Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05755v1FlowOE: Imitation Learning with Flow Policy from Ensemble RL Experts for Optimal Execution under Heston Volatility and Concave Market Impacts2025-06-06T05:28:22ZOptimal execution in financial markets refers to the process of strategically transacting a large volume of assets over a period to achieve the best possible outcome by balancing the trade-off between market impact costs and timing or volatility risks. Traditional optimal execution strategies, such as static Almgren-Chriss models, often prove suboptimal in dynamic financial markets. This paper propose flowOE, a novel imitation learning framework based on flow matching models, to address these limitations. FlowOE learns from a diverse set of expert traditional strategies and adaptively selects the most suitable expert behavior for prevailing market conditions. A key innovation is the incorporation of a refining loss function during the imitation process, enabling flowOE not only to mimic but also to improve upon the learned expert actions. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to apply flow matching models in a stochastic optimal execution problem. Empirical evaluations across various market conditions demonstrate that flowOE significantly outperforms both the specifically calibrated expert models and other traditional benchmarks, achieving higher profits with reduced risk. These results underscore the practical applicability and potential of flowOE to enhance adaptive optimal execution.2025-06-06T05:28:22Z3 figures, 3 algorithms, 7 tablesYang LiZhi Chenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04658v1Can Artificial Intelligence Trade the Stock Market?2025-06-05T05:59:10ZThe paper explores the use of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) in stock market trading, focusing on two algorithms: Double Deep Q-Network (DDQN) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and compares them with Buy and Hold benchmark. It evaluates these algorithms across three currency pairs, the S&P 500 index and Bitcoin, on the daily data in the period of 2019-2023. The results demonstrate DRL's effectiveness in trading and its ability to manage risk by strategically avoiding trades in unfavorable conditions, providing a substantial edge over classical approaches, based on supervised learning in terms of risk-adjusted returns.2025-06-05T05:59:10ZJędrzej MaskiewiczPaweł Sakowskihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20138v7TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework2025-06-03T05:45:06ZSignificant progress has been made in automated problem-solving using societies of agents powered by large language models (LLMs). In finance, efforts have largely focused on single-agent systems handling specific tasks or multi-agent frameworks independently gathering data. However, the multi-agent systems' potential to replicate real-world trading firms' collaborative dynamics remains underexplored. TradingAgents proposes a novel stock trading framework inspired by trading firms, featuring LLM-powered agents in specialized roles such as fundamental analysts, sentiment analysts, technical analysts, and traders with varied risk profiles. The framework includes Bull and Bear researcher agents assessing market conditions, a risk management team monitoring exposure, and traders synthesizing insights from debates and historical data to make informed decisions. By simulating a dynamic, collaborative trading environment, this framework aims to improve trading performance. Detailed architecture and extensive experiments reveal its superiority over baseline models, with notable improvements in cumulative returns, Sharpe ratio, and maximum drawdown, highlighting the potential of multi-agent LLM frameworks in financial trading. TradingAgents is available at https://github.com/TauricResearch/TradingAgents.2024-12-28T12:54:06ZTauric Research @ https://github.com/TauricResearch; Oral @ Multi-Agent AI in the Real WorldYijia XiaoEdward SunDi LuoWei Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20787v2Advanced simulation paradigm of human behaviour unveils complex financial systemic projection2025-05-31T05:30:25ZThe high-order complexity of human behaviour is likely the root cause of extreme difficulty in financial market projections. We consider that behavioural simulation can unveil systemic dynamics to support analysis. Simulating diverse human groups must account for the behavioural heterogeneity, especially in finance. To address the fidelity of simulated agents, on the basis of agent-based modeling, we propose a new paradigm of behavioural simulation where each agent is supported and driven by a hierarchical knowledge architecture. This architecture, integrating language and professional models, imitates behavioural processes in specific scenarios. Evaluated on futures markets, our simulator achieves a 13.29% deviation in simulating crisis scenarios whose price increase rate reaches 285.34%. Under normal conditions, our simulator also exhibits lower mean square error in predicting futures price of specific commodities. This technique bridges non-quantitative information with diverse market behaviour, offering a promising platform to simulate investor behaviour and its impact on market dynamics.2025-02-18T12:40:04ZCheng WangChuwen WangShirong ZengJianguo LiuChangjun Jiang