https://arxiv.org/api/BAfzEYkpSQapN0Gm1my2jM/lC+82026-03-28T09:14:41Z217118015http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14401v1Predictive Performance of LSTM Networks on Sectoral Stocks in an Emerging Market: A Case Study of the Pakistan Stock Exchange2025-09-17T20:07:27ZThe application of deep learning models for stock price forecasting in emerging markets remains underexplored despite their potential to capture complex temporal dependencies. This study develops and evaluates a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network model for predicting the closing prices of ten major stocks across diverse sectors of the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Utilizing historical OHLCV data and an extensive set of engineered technical indicators, we trained and validated the model on a multi-year dataset. Our results demonstrate strong predictive performance ($R^2 > 0.87$) for stocks in stable, high-liquidity sectors such as power generation, cement, and fertilizers. Conversely, stocks characterized by high volatility, low liquidity, or sensitivity to external shocks (e.g., global oil prices) presented significant forecasting challenges. The study provides a replicable framework for LSTM-based forecasting in data-scarce emerging markets and discusses implications for investors and future research.2025-09-17T20:07:27Z11 pages, 10 figures. Ancillary files to reproduce results available at https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1t15Q5TQ0xbEAdQo7j05LQsO1XHTAlPEr Random seeder is set to 42. This paper is also to be submitted to Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) after feedback and responseAhad YaqoobSyed M. Abdullahhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.12764v1Myopic Optimality: why reinforcement learning portfolio management strategies lose money2025-09-16T07:24:24ZMyopic optimization (MO) outperforms reinforcement learning (RL) in portfolio management: RL yields lower or negative returns, higher variance, larger costs, heavier CVaR, lower profitability, and greater model risk. We model execution/liquidation frictions with mark-to-market accounting. Using Malliavin calculus (Clark-Ocone/BEL), we derive policy gradients and risk shadow price, unifying HJB and KKT. This gives dual gap and convergence results: geometric MO vs. RL floors. We quantify phantom profit in RL via Malliavin policy-gradient contamination analysis and define a control-affects-dynamics (CAD) premium of RL indicating plausibly positive.2025-09-16T07:24:24Z43 pagesYuming Mahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00447v2Optimal Liquidation with Signals: the General Propagator Case2025-09-15T20:35:56ZWe consider a class of optimal liquidation problems where the agent's transactions create transient price impact driven by a Volterra-type propagator along with temporary price impact. We formulate these problems as maximization of a revenue-risk functionals, where the agent also exploits available information on a progressively measurable price predicting signal. By using an infinite dimensional stochastic control approach, we characterize the value function in terms of a solution to a free-boundary $L^2$-valued backward stochastic differential equation and an operator-valued Riccati equation. We then derive analytic solutions to these equations which yields an explicit expression for the optimal trading strategy. We show that our formulas can be implemented in a straightforward and efficient way for a large class of price impact kernels with possible singularities such as the power-law kernel.2022-11-01T13:24:17Z54 pages, 5 figuresEduardo Abi JaberEyal Neumanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11990v1Bootstrapping Liquidity in BTC-Denominated Prediction Markets2025-09-15T14:42:17ZPrediction markets have gained adoption as on-chain mechanisms for aggregating information, with platforms such as Polymarket demonstrating demand for stablecoin-denominated markets. However, denominating in non-interest-bearing stablecoins introduces inefficiencies: participants face opportunity costs relative to the fiat risk-free rate, and Bitcoin holders in particular lose exposure to BTC appreciation when converting into stablecoins. This paper explores the case for prediction markets denominated in Bitcoin, treating BTC as a deflationary settlement asset analogous to gold under the classical gold standard. We analyse three methods of supplying liquidity to a newly created BTC-denominated prediction market: cross-market making against existing stablecoin venues, automated market making, and DeFi-based redirection of user trades. For each approach we evaluate execution mechanics, risks (slippage, exchange-rate risk, and liquidation risk), and capital efficiency. Our analysis shows that cross-market making provides the most user-friendly risk profile, though it requires active professional makers or platform-subsidised liquidity. DeFi redirection offers rapid bootstrapping and reuse of existing USDC liquidity, but exposes users to liquidation thresholds and exchange-rate volatility, reducing capital efficiency. Automated market making is simple to deploy but capital-inefficient and exposes liquidity providers to permanent loss. The results suggest that BTC-denominated prediction markets are feasible, but their success depends critically on the choice of liquidity provisioning mechanism and the trade-off between user safety and deployment convenience.2025-09-15T14:42:17ZLaTeX; pdfLaTeX; includes precompiled main.bbl. 2 figures (TikZ)Fedor Shabashevhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11970v1Sentiment Feedback in Equity Markets: Asymmetries, Retail Heterogeneity, and Structural Calibration2025-09-15T14:22:04ZWe study how sentiment shocks propagate through equity returns and investor clientele using four independent proxies with sign-aligned kappa-rho parameters. A structural calibration links a one standard deviation innovation in sentiment to a pricing impact of 1.06 basis points with persistence parameter rho = 0.940, yielding a half-life of 11.2 months. The impulse response peaks around the 12-month horizon, indicating slow-moving amplification. Cross-sectionally, a simple D10-D1 portfolio earns 4.0 basis points per month with Sharpe ratios of 0.18-0.85, consistent with tradable exposure to the sentiment factor. Three regularities emerge: (i) positive sentiment innovations transmit more strongly than negative shocks (amplification asymmetry); (ii) effects are concentrated in retail-tilted and non-optionable stocks (clientele heterogeneity); and (iii) responses are state-dependent across volatility regimes - larger on impact in high-VIX months but more persistent in low-VIX months. Baseline time-series fits are parsimonious (R2 ~ 0.001; 420 monthly observations), yet the calibrated dynamics reconcile modest impact estimates with sizable long-short payoffs. Consistent with Miller (1977), a one standard deviation sentiment shock has 1.72-8.69 basis points larger effects in low-breadth stocks across horizons of 1-12 months, is robust to institutional flows, and exhibits volatility state dependence - larger on impact but less persistent in high-VIX months, smaller on impact but more persistent in low-VIX months.2025-09-15T14:22:04ZLucas Marques Snellerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11420v1Trading-R1: Financial Trading with LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning2025-09-14T20:13:41ZDeveloping professional, structured reasoning on par with human financial analysts and traders remains a central challenge in AI for finance, where markets demand interpretability and trust. Traditional time-series models lack explainability, while LLMs face challenges in turning natural-language analysis into disciplined, executable trades. Although reasoning LLMs have advanced in step-by-step planning and verification, their application to risk-sensitive financial decisions is underexplored. We present Trading-R1, a financially-aware model that incorporates strategic thinking and planning for comprehensive thesis composition, facts-grounded analysis, and volatility-adjusted decision making. Trading-R1 aligns reasoning with trading principles through supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with a three-stage easy-to-hard curriculum. Training uses Tauric-TR1-DB, a 100k-sample corpus spanning 18 months, 14 equities, and five heterogeneous financial data sources. Evaluated on six major equities and ETFs, Trading-R1 demonstrates improved risk-adjusted returns and lower drawdowns compared to both open-source and proprietary instruction-following models as well as reasoning models. The system generates structured, evidence-based investment theses that support disciplined and interpretable trading decisions. Trading-R1 Terminal will be released at https://github.com/TauricResearch/Trading-R1.2025-09-14T20:13:41ZTauric Research: https://github.com/TauricResearchYijia XiaoEdward SunTong ChenFang WuDi LuoWei Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21337v1Optimized Operation of Standalone Battery Energy Storage Systems in the Cross-Market Energy Arbitrage Business2025-09-12T11:35:12ZThe provision of renewable electricity is the foundation for a sustainable future. To achieve the goal of sustainable renewable energy, Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) could play a key role to counteract the intermittency of solar and wind generation power. In order to aid the system, the BESS can simply charge at low wholesale prices and discharge during high prices, which is also called energy arbitrage. However, the real-time execution of energy arbitrage is not straightforward for many companies due to the fundamentally different behavior of storages compared to conventional power plants. In this work, the optimized operation of standalone BESS in the cross-market energy arbitrage business is addressed by describing a generic framework for trading integrated BESS operation, the development of a suitable backtest engine and a specific optimization-based strategy formulation for cross-market optimized BESS operation. In addition, this strategy is tested in a case study with a sensitivity analysis to investigate the influence of forecast uncertainty. The results show that the proposed strategy allows an increment in revenues by taking advantage of the increasing market volatility. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis shows the robustness of the proposed strategy, as only a moderate portion of revenues will be lost if real forecasts are adopted.2025-09-12T11:35:12ZOriginally submitted in August 2024 as part of the Discovery-led Project course from Ruhr West University of Applied Sciences in cooperation with Iqony GmbH; revised and updated for arXivLuis van Sandbergenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10094v1Competition and Incentives in a Shared Order Book2025-09-12T09:36:45ZRecent regulation on intraday electricity markets has led to the development of shared order books with the intention to foster competition and increase market liquidity. In this paper, we address the question of the efficiency of such regulations by analysing the situation of two exchanges sharing a single limit order book, i.e. a quote by a market maker can be hit by a trade arriving on the other exchange. We develop a Principal-Agent model where each exchange acts as the Principal of her own market maker acting as her Agent. Exchanges and market makers have all CARA utility functions with potentially different risk-aversion parameters. In terms of mathematical result, we show existence and uniqueness of the resulting Nash equilibrium between exchanges, give the optimal incentive contracts and provide numerical solution to the PDE satisfied by the certainty equivalent of the exchanges. From an economic standpoint, our model demonstrates that incentive provision constitutes a public good. More precisely, it highlights the presence of a competitiveness spillover effect: when one exchange optimally incentivizes its market maker, the competing exchange also reaps indirect benefits. This interdependence gives rise to a free-rider problem. Given that providing incentives entails a cost, the strategic interaction between exchanges may lead to an equilibrium in which neither platform offers incentives -- ultimately resulting in diminished overall competition.2025-09-12T09:36:45ZRené AïdPhilippe BergaultMathieu Rosenbaumhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05080v2MM-DREX: Multimodal-Driven Dynamic Routing of LLM Experts for Financial Trading2025-09-10T15:45:41ZThe inherent non-stationarity of financial markets and the complexity of multi-modal information pose significant challenges to existing quantitative trading models. Traditional methods relying on fixed structures and unimodal data struggle to adapt to market regime shifts, while large language model (LLM)-driven solutions - despite their multi-modal comprehension - suffer from static strategies and homogeneous expert designs, lacking dynamic adjustment and fine-grained decision mechanisms. To address these limitations, we propose MM-DREX: a Multimodal-driven, Dynamically-Routed EXpert framework based on large language models. MM-DREX explicitly decouples market state perception from strategy execution to enable adaptive sequential decision-making in non-stationary environments. Specifically, it (1) introduces a vision-language model (VLM)-powered dynamic router that jointly analyzes candlestick chart patterns and long-term temporal features to allocate real-time expert weights; (2) designs four heterogeneous trading experts (trend, reversal, breakout, positioning) generating specialized fine-grained sub-strategies; and (3) proposes an SFT-RL hybrid training paradigm to synergistically optimize the router's market classification capability and experts' risk-adjusted decision-making. Extensive experiments on multi-modal datasets spanning stocks, futures, and cryptocurrencies demonstrate that MM-DREX significantly outperforms 15 baselines (including state-of-the-art financial LLMs and deep reinforcement learning models) across key metrics: total return, Sharpe ratio, and maximum drawdown, validating its robustness and generalization. Additionally, an interpretability module traces routing logic and expert behavior in real time, providing an audit trail for strategy transparency.2025-09-05T13:19:51ZYang ChenYueheng JiangZhaozhao MaYuchen CaoJacky KeungKun KuangLeilei GanYiquan WuFei Wuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18177v3Growth rate of liquidity provider's wealth in G3Ms2025-09-06T22:58:15ZWe study how trading fees and continuous-time arbitrage affect the profitability of liquidity providers (LPs) in Geometric Mean Market Makers (G3Ms). We use stochastic reflected diffusion processes to analyze the dynamics of a G3M model under the arbitrage-driven market. Our research focuses on calculating LP wealth and extends the findings of Tassy and White related to the constant product market maker (Uniswap v2) to a wider range of G3Ms, including Balancer. This allows us to calculate the long-term expected logarithmic growth of LP wealth, offering new insights into the complex dynamics of AMMs and their implications for LPs in decentralized finance.2024-03-27T01:10:31Z40 pages, 5 figuresCheuk Yin LeeShen-Ning TungTai-Ho Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05107v1Painting the market: generative diffusion models for financial limit order book simulation and forecasting2025-09-05T13:43:12ZSimulating limit order books (LOBs) has important applications across forecasting and backtesting for financial market data. However, deep generative models struggle in this context due to the high noise and complexity of the data. Previous work uses autoregressive models, although these experience error accumulation over longer-time sequences. We introduce a novel approach, converting LOB data into a structured image format, and applying diffusion models with inpainting to generate future LOB states. This method leverages spatio-temporal inductive biases in the order book and enables parallel generation of long sequences overcoming issues with error accumulation. We also publicly contribute to LOB-Bench, the industry benchmark for LOB generative models, to allow fair comparison between models using Level-2 and Level-3 order book data (with or without message level data respectively). We show that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on LOB-Bench, despite using lower fidelity data as input. We also show that our method prioritises coherent global structures over local, high-fidelity details, providing significant improvements over existing methods on certain metrics. Overall, our method lays a strong foundation for future research into generative diffusion approaches to LOB modelling.2025-09-05T13:43:12ZSubmitted to ICAIFAlfred BackhouseKang LiJakob FoersterAnisoara CalinescuStefan Zohrenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05065v1The Subtle Interplay between Square-root Impact, Order Imbalance & Volatility II: An Artificial Market Generator2025-09-05T12:57:59ZThis work extends and complements our previous theoretical paper on the subtle interplay between impact, order flow and volatility. In the present paper, we generate synthetic market data following the specification of that paper and show that the approximations made there are actually justified, which provides quantitative support our conclusion that price volatility can be fully explained by the superposition of correlated metaorders which all impact prices, on average, as a square-root of executed volume. One of the most striking predictions of our model is the structure of the correlation between generalized order flow and returns, which is observed empirically and reproduced using our synthetic market generator. Furthermore, we were able to construct proxy metaorders from our simulated order flow that reproduce the square-root law of market impact, lending further credence to the proposal made in Ref. [2] to measure the impact of real metaorders from tape data (i.e. anonymized trades), which was long thought to be impossible.2025-09-05T12:57:59ZGuillaume MaitrierGrégoire LoeperJean-Philippe Bouchaudhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05013v1Dynamics of Liquidity Surfaces in Uniswap v32025-09-05T11:23:21ZThis paper presents a comprehensive study on the empirical dynamics of Uniswap v3 liquidity, which we model as a time-tick surface, $L_t(x)$. Using a combination of functional principal component analysis (FPCA) and dynamic factor methods, we analyze three distinct pools over multiple sample periods. Our findings offer three main contributions: a statistical characterization of automated market maker liquidity, an interpretable and portable basis for dimension reduction, and a robust analysis of liquidity dynamics using rolling window metrics. For the 5 bps pools, the leading empirical eigenfunctions explain the majority of cross-tick variation and remain stable, aligning closely with a low-order Legendre polynomial basis. This alignment provides a parsimonious and interpretable structure, similar to the dynamic Nelson-Siegel method for yield curves. The factor coefficients exhibit a time series structure well-captured by AR(1) models with clear GARCH-type heteroskedasticity and heavy-tailed innovations.2025-09-05T11:23:21ZJimmy RiskShen-Ning TungTai-Ho Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02941v1Non-Linear and Meta-Stable Dynamics in Financial Markets: Evidence from High Frequency Crypto Currency Market Makers2025-09-03T02:14:03ZThis work builds upon the long-standing conjecture that linear diffusion models are inadequate for complex market dynamics. Specifically, it provides experimental validation for the author's prior arguments that realistic market dynamics are governed by higher-order (cubic and higher) non-linearities in the drift. As the diffusion drift is given by the negative gradient of a potential function, this means that a non-linear drift translates into a non-quadratic potential. These arguments were based both on general theoretical grounds as well as a structured approach to modeling the price dynamics which incorporates money flows and their impact on market prices. Here, we find direct confirmation of this view by analyzing high-frequency crypto currency data at different time scales ranging from minutes to months. We find that markets can be characterized by either a single-well or a double-well potential, depending on the time period and sampling frequency, where a double-well potential may signal market uncertainty or stress.2025-09-03T02:14:03Z11 pages, 4 equations, 4 figuresIgor Halperinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01683v1The Impact of Sequential versus Parallel Clearing Mechanisms in Agent-Based Simulations of Artificial Limit Order Book Exchanges2025-09-01T18:03:55ZThis study examines the impact of different computing implementations of clearing mechanisms on multi-asset price dynamics within an artificial stock market framework. We show that sequential processing of order books introduces a systematic and significant bias by affecting the allocation of traders' capital within a single time step. This occurs because applying budget constraints sequentially grants assets processed earlier preferential access to funds, distorting individual asset demand and consequently their price trajectories. The findings highlight that while the overall price level is primarily driven by macro factors like the money-to-stock ratio, the market's microstructural clearing mechanism plays a critical role in the allocation of value among individual assets. This underscores the necessity for careful consideration and validation of clearing mechanisms in artificial markets to accurately model complex financial behaviors.2025-09-01T18:03:55ZMatej SteinbacherMitja SteinbacherMatjaz Steinbacher