https://arxiv.org/api/sM7V6GQDIEhAjjTbzWvupoW71is2026-03-26T20:29:13Z217116515http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06879v1Nonparametric Estimation of Self- and Cross-Impact2025-10-08T10:47:31ZWe introduce an offline nonparametric estimator for concave multi-asset propagator models based on a dataset of correlated price trajectories and metaorders. Compared to parametric models, our framework avoids parameter explosion in the multi-asset case and yields confidence bounds for the estimator. We implement the estimator using both proprietary metaorder data from Capital Fund Management (CFM) and publicly available S&P order flow data, where we augment the former dataset using a metaorder proxy. In particular, we provide unbiased evidence that self-impact is concave and exhibits a shifted power-law decay, and show that the metaorder proxy stabilizes the calibration. Moreover, we find that introducing cross-impact provides a significant gain in explanatory power, with concave specifications outperforming linear ones, suggesting that the square-root law extends to cross-impact. We also measure asymmetric cross-impact between assets driven by relative liquidity differences. Finally, we demonstrate that a shape-constrained projection of the nonparametric kernel not only ensures interpretability but also slightly outperforms established parametric models in terms of predictive accuracy.2025-10-08T10:47:31Z31 pages, 10 figuresNatascha HeyEyal NeumanSturmius Tuschmannhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06788v4Returns and Order Flow Imbalances: Intraday Dynamics and Macroeconomic News Effects2025-10-08T05:47:43ZWe study the interaction between returns and order flow imbalances in the S&P 500 E-mini futures market using a structural VAR model identified through heteroskedasticity. The model is estimated at one-second frequency for each 15-minute interval, capturing both intraday variation and endogeneity due to time aggregation. We find that macroeconomic news announcements sharply reshape price-flow dynamics: price impact rises, flow impact declines, return volatility spikes, and flow volatility falls. Pooling across days, both price and flow impacts are significant at the one-second horizon, with estimates broadly consistent with stylized limit-order-book predictions. Impulse responses indicate that shocks dissipate almost entirely within a second. Structural parameters and volatilities also exhibit pronounced intraday variation tied to liquidity, trading intensity, and spreads. These results provide new evidence on high-frequency price formation and liquidity, highlighting the role of public information and order submission in shaping market quality.2025-08-09T02:34:23ZMakoto Takahashihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2006.06395v5Path-dependent Kyle equilibrium model2025-10-07T21:00:52ZWe consider an auction type equilibrium model with an insider in line with the one originally introduced by Kyle in 1985 and then extended to the continuous time setting by Back in 1992. The novelty introduced with this paper is that we deal with a general price functional depending on the whole past of the aggregate demand, i.e. we work with path-dependency. By using the functional Itô calculus, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of an equilibrium. Furthermore, we consider both the cases of a risk-neutral and a risk-averse insider.2020-06-11T13:12:03ZJosé M. CorcueraGiulia Di Nunnohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06095v1A Microstructure Analysis of Coupling in CFMMs2025-10-07T16:23:35ZThe programmable and composable nature of smart contract protocols has enabled the emergence of novel market structures and asset classes that are architecturally frictional to implement in traditional financial paradigms. This fluidity has produced an understudied class of market dynamics, particularly in coupled markets where one market serves as an oracle for the other. In such market structures, purchases or liquidations through the intermediate asset create coupled price action between the intermediate and final assets; leading to basket inflation or deflation when denominated in the riskless asset. This paper examines the microstructure of this inflationary dynamic given two constant function market makers (CFMMs) as the intermediate market structures; attempting to quantify their contributions to the former relative to familiar pool metrics such as price drift, trade size, and market depth. Further, a concrete case study is developed, where both markets are constant product markets. The intention is to shed light on the market design process within such coupled environments.2025-10-07T16:23:35ZAlthea SterrettAustin Adamshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05428v1Concentrated N-dimensional AMM with Polar Coordinates in Rust2025-10-06T22:42:22ZWe expand on the recent development of n-dimensional automated market makers for stablecoins by showing a way to build concentrated liquidity positions with ticks in polar coordinates in Rust, including the featured ability to skew said concentrated liquidity. We highlight the risk of stacking too many stablecoin pools and how to hedge said risk.2025-10-06T22:42:22Z10 pages, 7 figuresVasily TolstikovMarcus WentzJoseph SchiarizziDerek Dinghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04569v1Risk-Sensitive Option Market Making with Arbitrage-Free eSSVI Surfaces: A Constrained RL and Stochastic Control Bridge2025-10-06T08:11:16ZWe formulate option market making as a constrained, risk-sensitive control problem that unifies execution, hedging, and arbitrage-free implied-volatility surfaces inside a single learning loop. A fully differentiable eSSVI layer enforces static no-arbitrage conditions (butterfly and calendar) while the policy controls half-spreads, hedge intensity, and structured surface deformations (state-dependent rho-shift and psi-scale). Executions are intensity-driven and respond monotonically to spreads and relative mispricing; tail risk is shaped with a differentiable CVaR objective via the Rockafellar--Uryasev program. We provide theory for (i) grid-consistency and rates for butterfly/calendar surrogates, (ii) a primal--dual grounding of a learnable dual action acting as a state-dependent Lagrange multiplier, (iii) differentiable CVaR estimators with mixed pathwise and likelihood-ratio gradients and epi-convergence to the nonsmooth objective, (iv) an eSSVI wing-growth bound aligned with Lee's moment constraints, and (v) policy-gradient validity under smooth surrogates. In simulation (Heston fallback; ABIDES-ready), the agent attains positive adjusted P\&L on most intraday segments while keeping calendar violations at numerical zero and butterfly violations at the numerical floor; ex-post tails remain realistic and can be tuned through the CVaR weight. The five control heads admit clear economic semantics and analytic sensitivities, yielding a white-box learner that unifies pricing consistency and execution control in a reproducible pipeline.2025-10-06T08:11:16Z34 pages including appendices; figures included. Primary subject class: q-fin.TR. Cross-lists: cs.LG; q-fin.CPJian'an Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04555v1Tail-Safe Hedging: Explainable Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with a White-Box CBF--QP Safety Layer in Arbitrage-Free Markets2025-10-06T07:39:45ZWe introduce Tail-Safe, a deployability-oriented framework for derivatives hedging that unifies distributional, risk-sensitive reinforcement learning with a white-box control-barrier-function (CBF) quadratic-program (QP) safety layer tailored to financial constraints. The learning component combines an IQN-based distributional critic with a CVaR objective (IQN--CVaR--PPO) and a Tail-Coverage Controller that regulates quantile sampling through temperature tilting and tail boosting to stabilize small-$α$ estimation. The safety component enforces discrete-time CBF inequalities together with domain-specific constraints -- ellipsoidal no-trade bands, box and rate limits, and a sign-consistency gate -- solved as a convex QP whose telemetry (active sets, tightness, rate utilization, gate scores, slack, and solver status) forms an auditable trail for governance. We provide guarantees of robust forward invariance of the safe set under bounded model mismatch, a minimal-deviation projection interpretation of the QP, a KL-to-DRO upper bound linking per-state KL regularization to worst-case CVaR, concentration and sample-complexity results for the temperature-tilted CVaR estimator, and a CVaR trust-region improvement inequality under KL limits, together with feasibility persistence under expiry-aware tightening. Empirically, in arbitrage-free, microstructure-aware synthetic markets (SSVI $\to$ Dupire $\to$ VIX with ABIDES/MockLOB execution), Tail-Safe improves left-tail risk without degrading central performance and yields zero hard-constraint violations whenever the QP is feasible with zero slack. Telemetry is mapped to governance dashboards and incident workflows to support explainability and auditability. Limitations include reliance on synthetic data and simplified execution to isolate methodological contributions.2025-10-06T07:39:45Z32 pages including appendices; 5 figures. Primary subject class: q-fin.TR. Cross-lists: cs.LG; q-fin.RMJian'an Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03209v1Joint Bidding on Intraday and Frequency Containment Reserve Markets2025-10-03T17:48:21ZAs renewable energy integration increases supply variability, battery energy storage systems (BESS) present a viable solution for balancing supply and demand. This paper proposes a novel approach for optimizing battery BESS participation in multiple electricity markets. We develop a joint bidding strategy that combines participation in the primary frequency reserve market with continuous trading in the intraday market, addressing a gap in the extant literature which typically considers these markets in isolation or simplifies the continuous nature of intraday trading. Our approach utilizes a mixed integer linear programming implementation of the rolling intrinsic algorithm for intraday decisions and state of charge recovery, alongside a learned classifier strategy (LCS) that determines optimal capacity allocation between markets. A comprehensive out-of-sample backtest over more than one year of historical German market data validates our approach: The LCS increases overall profits by over 4% compared to the best-performing static strategy and by more than 3% over a naive dynamic benchmark. Crucially, our method closes the gap to a theoretical perfect foresight strategy to just 4%, demonstrating the effectiveness of dynamic, learning-based allocation in a complex, multi-market environment.2025-10-03T17:48:21ZYiming ZhangWolfgang RidingerDavid Wozabalhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02986v1FR-LUX: Friction-Aware, Regime-Conditioned Policy Optimization for Implementable Portfolio Management2025-10-03T13:22:54ZTransaction costs and regime shifts are major reasons why paper portfolios fail in live trading. We introduce FR-LUX (Friction-aware, Regime-conditioned Learning under eXecution costs), a reinforcement learning framework that learns after-cost trading policies and remains robust across volatility-liquidity regimes. FR-LUX integrates three ingredients: (i) a microstructure-consistent execution model combining proportional and impact costs, directly embedded in the reward; (ii) a trade-space trust region that constrains changes in inventory flow rather than logits, yielding stable low-turnover updates; and (iii) explicit regime conditioning so the policy specializes to LL/LH/HL/HH states without fragmenting the data. On a 4 x 5 grid of regimes and cost levels with multiple random seeds, FR-LUX achieves the top average Sharpe ratio with narrow bootstrap confidence intervals, maintains a flatter cost-performance slope than strong baselines, and attains superior risk-return efficiency for a given turnover budget. Pairwise scenario-level improvements are strictly positive and remain statistically significant after multiple-testing corrections. We provide formal guarantees on optimality under convex frictions, monotonic improvement under a KL trust region, long-run turnover bounds and induced inaction bands due to proportional costs, positive value advantage for regime-conditioned policies, and robustness to cost misspecification. The methodology is implementable: costs are calibrated from standard liquidity proxies, scenario-level inference avoids pseudo-replication, and all figures and tables are reproducible from released artifacts.2025-10-03T13:22:54Z19 pages, 7 figures, includes theoretical guarantees and empirical evaluation, submitted to AI/ML in Finance trackJian'an Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02741v1Do Mutual Funds Make Active and Skilled Liquidity Choices in Portfolio Management? Evidence from India2025-10-03T05:58:29ZThis study examines active liquidity management by Indian open-ended equity mutual funds. We find that fund managers respond to inflows by increasing cash holdings, which are later used to purchase less-liquid stocks at favourable valuations. Funds with less liquid portfolios tend to maintain larger cash reserves to manage flows. Funds that make active liquidity choices yield statistically and economically significant gross and net returns. The performance differences between funds with varying activeness in altering liquidity highlight the importance of active liquidity management in markets with substantial cross-sectional liquidity differences such as India.2025-10-03T05:58:29ZAccepted in Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. This is an early, pre-review version of the paperEmerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2025Pankaj K AgarwalH K PradhanKonark Saxena10.1080/1540496X.2025.2566224http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01814v1Mean-field theory of the Santa Fe model revisited: a systematic derivation from an exact BBGKY hierarchy for the zero-intelligence limit-order book model2025-10-02T09:00:43ZThe Santa Fe model is an established econophysics model for describing stochastic dynamics of the limit order book from the viewpoint of the zero-intelligence approach. While its foundation was studied by combining a dimensional analysis and a mean-field theory by E. Smith et al. in Quantitative Finance 2003, their arguments are rather heuristic and lack solid mathematical foundation; indeed, their mean-field equations were derived with heuristic arguments and their solutions were not explicitly obtained. In this work, we revisit the mean-field theory of the Santa Fe model from the viewpoint of kinetic theory -- a traditional mathematical program in statistical physics. We study the exact master equation for the Santa Fe model and systematically derive the Bogoliubov-Born-Green-Kirkwood-Yvon (BBGKY) hierarchical equation. By applying the mean-field approximation, we derive the mean-field equation for the order-book density profile, parallel to the Boltzmann equation in conventional statistical physics. Furthermore, we obtain explicit and closed expression of the mean-field solutions. Our solutions have several implications: (1)Our scaling formulas are available for both $μ\to 0$ and $μ\to \infty$ asymptotics, where $μ$ is the market-order submission intensity. Particularly, the mean-field theory works very well for small $μ$, while its validity is partially limited for large $μ$. (2)The ``method of image'' solution, heuristically derived by Bouchaud-Mézard-Potters in Quantitative Finance 2002, is obtained for large $μ$, serving as a mathematical foundation for their heuristic arguments. (3)Finally, we point out an error in E. Smith et al. 2003 in the scaling law for the diffusion constant due to a misspecification in their dimensional analysis.2025-10-02T09:00:43Z40 pages, 10 figuresTaiki WakatsukiKiyoshi Kanazawahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22985v1Forecasting Liquidity Withdraw with Machine Learning Models2025-09-26T22:35:55ZLiquidity withdrawal is a critical indicator of market fragility. In this project, I test a framework for forecasting liquidity withdrawal at the individual-stock level, ranging from less liquid stocks to highly liquid large-cap tickers, and evaluate the relative performance of competing model classes in predicting short-horizon order book stress. We introduce the Liquidity Withdrawal Index (LWI) -- defined as the ratio of order cancellations to the sum of standing depth and new additions at the best quotes -- as a bounded, interpretable measure of transient liquidity removal.
Using Nasdaq market-by-order (MBO) data, we compare a spectrum of approaches: linear benchmarks (AR, HAR), and non-linear tree ensembles (XGBoost), across horizons ranging from 250\,ms to 5\,s. Beyond predictive accuracy, our results provide insights into order placement and cancellation dynamics, identify regimes where linear versus non-linear signals dominate, and highlight how early-warning indicators of liquidity withdrawal can inform both market surveillance and execution.2025-09-26T22:35:55Z HaochuanKevin Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21244v1Multivariate Quadratic Hawkes Processes -- Part II: Non-Parametric Empirical Calibration2025-09-25T14:38:01ZThis is the second part of our work on Multivariate Quadratic Hawkes (MQHawkes) Processes, devoted to the calibration of the model defined and studied analytically in Aubrun, C., Benzaquen, M., & Bouchaud, J. P., Quantitative Finance, 23(5), 741-758 (2023). We propose a non-parametric calibration method based on the general method of moments applied to a coarse-grained version of the MQHawkes model. This allows us to bypass challenges inherent to tick by tick data. Our main methodological innovation is a multi-step calibration procedure, first focusing on ''self'' feedback kernels, and then progressively including cross-effects. Indeed, while cross-effects are significant and interpretable, they are usually one order of magnitude smaller than self-effects, and must therefore be disentangled from noise with care. For numerical stability, we also restrict to pair interactions and only calibrate bi-variate QHawkes, neglecting higher-order interactions. Our main findings are: (a) While cross-Hawkes feedback effects have been empirically studied previously, cross-Zumbach effects are clearly identified here for the first time. The effect of recent trends of the E-Mini futures contract onto the volatility of other futures contracts is especially strong; (b) We have identified a new type of feedback that couples past realized covariance between two assets and future volatility of these two assets, with the pair E-Mini vs TBOND as a case in point; (c) A cross-leverage effect, whereby the sign of the return of one asset impacts the volatility of another asset, is also clearly identified. The cross-leverage effect between the E-Mini and the residual volatility of single stocks is notable, and surprisingly universal across the universe of stocks that we considered.2025-09-25T14:38:01ZCecilia AubrunMichael BenzaquenJean-Philippe Bouchaudhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17715v1Enhanced fill probability estimates in institutional algorithmic bond trading using statistical learning algorithms with quantum computers2025-09-22T12:51:31ZThe estimation of fill probabilities for trade orders represents a key ingredient in the optimization of algorithmic trading strategies. It is bound by the complex dynamics of financial markets with inherent uncertainties, and the limitations of models aiming to learn from multivariate financial time series that often exhibit stochastic properties with hidden temporal patterns. In this paper, we focus on algorithmic responses to trade inquiries in the corporate bond market and investigate fill probability estimation errors of common machine learning models when given real production-scale intraday trade event data, transformed by a quantum algorithm running on IBM Heron processors, as well as on noiseless quantum simulators for comparison. We introduce a framework to embed these quantum-generated data transforms as a decoupled offline component that can be selectively queried by models in low-latency institutional trade optimization settings. A trade execution backtesting method is employed to evaluate the fill prediction performance of these models in relation to their input data. We observe a relative gain of up to ~ 34% in out-of-sample test scores for those models with access to quantum hardware-transformed data over those using the original trading data or transforms by noiseless quantum simulation. These empirical results suggest that the inherent noise in current quantum hardware contributes to this effect and motivates further studies. Our work demonstrates the emerging potential of quantum computing as a complementary explorative tool in quantitative finance and encourages applied industry research towards practical applications in trading.2025-09-22T12:51:31Z16 pages, 13 Figures, 4 TablesAxel CiceriAustin CottrellJoshua FreelandDaniel FryHirotoshi HiraiPhilip IntalluraHwajung KangChee-Kong LeeAbhijit MitraKentaro OhnoDas PemmarajuManuel ProisslBrian QuanzDel RajanNoriaki ShimadaKavitha Yograjhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20474v3MountainLion: A Multi-Modal LLM-Based Agent System for Interpretable and Adaptive Financial Trading2025-09-19T02:22:53ZCryptocurrency trading is a challenging task requiring the integration of heterogeneous data from multiple modalities. Traditional deep learning and reinforcement learning approaches typically demand large training datasets and encode diverse inputs into numerical representations, often at the cost of interpretability. Recent progress in large language model (LLM)-based agents has demonstrated the capacity to process multi-modal data and support complex investment decision-making. Building on these advances, we present \textbf{MountainLion}, a multi-modal, multi-agent system for financial trading that coordinates specialized LLM-based agents to interpret financial data and generate investment strategies. MountainLion processes textual news, candlestick charts, and trading signal charts to produce high-quality financial reports, while also enabling modification of reports and investment recommendations through data-driven user interaction and question answering. A central reflection module analyzes historical trading signals and outcomes to continuously refine decision processes, and the system is capable of real-time report analysis, summarization, and dynamic adjustment of investment strategies. Empirical results confirm that MountainLion systematically enriches technical price triggers with contextual macroeconomic and capital flow signals, providing a more interpretable, robust, and actionable investment framework that improves returns and strengthens investor confidence.2025-07-13T05:39:42ZSiyi WuJunqiao WangZhaoyang GuanLeyi ZhaoXinyuan SongXinyu YingDexu YuJinhao WangHanlin ZhangMichele PakYangfan HeYi XinJianhui WangTianyu Shi