https://arxiv.org/api/DGJ0GeAkc3VMd34klpcQdvjBzGk2026-06-13T19:12:16Z225910515http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10194v1Mandatory Disclosure in Oligopolistic Market Making2026-04-11T12:59:37ZWe develop a multi-period Kyle-type model that incorporates both mandatory disclosure of informed trades and imperfect competition among market makers. We prove the existence and uniqueness of a linear equilibrium and show that the liquidity-enhancing effect of disclosure is fundamentally linked to the degree of market-making competition. Disclosure lowers trading costs by reducing price impact, and its marginal benefit is strictly larger when competition is weak. We empirically validate this prediction using the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act disclosure reform as a natural experiment. A difference-in-differences analysis of U.S. equities confirms that the spread reduction following enhanced disclosure is significantly larger for stocks with fewer active market makers.2026-04-11T12:59:37ZSeongjin KimJin Hyuk Choihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18177v4Growth rate of liquidity provider's wealth in G3Ms2026-04-11T11:36:22ZWe study how trading fees and continuous-time arbitrage affect the profitability of liquidity providers (LPs) in Geometric Mean Market Makers (G3Ms). We use stochastic reflected diffusion processes to analyze the dynamics of a G3M model under the arbitrage-driven market. Our research focuses on calculating LP wealth and extends the findings of Tassy and White related to the constant product market maker (Uniswap v2) to a wider range of G3Ms, including Balancer. This allows us to calculate the long-term expected logarithmic growth of LP wealth, offering new insights into the complex dynamics of AMMs and their implications for LPs in decentralized finance.2024-03-27T01:10:31Z42 pages, 5 figuresCheuk Yin LeeShen-Ning TungTai-Ho Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11813v2Optimal Execution under Liquidity Uncertainty2026-04-11T09:53:59ZWe study an optimal execution strategy for purchasing a large block of shares over a fixed time horizon. The execution problem is subject to a general price impact that gradually dissipates due to market resilience. We allow for general limit order book shapes to characterize instantaneous market impact. To model the resilience dynamics, we introduce a stochastic process that governs the rate at which the deviation between the impacted and unaffected prices decays. This volume-effect process reflects fluctuations in market activity that drive the pace of liquidity replenishment. Additionally, we incorporate stochastic liquidity variations through a regime-switching Markov chain to capture abrupt shifts in market conditions. We study this singular control problem, where the trader optimally determines the timing and rate of purchases to minimize execution costs. The associated value function to this optimization problem is shown to satisfy a system of variational Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman inequalities. Moreover, we establish that it is the unique viscosity solution to this HJB system and study the analytical properties of the free boundary separating the execution and continuation regions. To illustrate our results, we present numerical examples under different limit-order book configurations, highlighting the interplay between price impact, resilience dynamics, and stochastic liquidity regimes in shaping the optimal execution strategy.2025-06-13T14:17:31ZEtienne ChevalierYadh HafsiVathana Ly VathSergio Pulidohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03888v1PolySwarm: A Multi-Agent Large Language Model Framework for Prediction Market Trading and Latency Arbitrage2026-04-04T22:51:06ZThis paper presents PolySwarm, a novel multi-agent large language model (LLM) framework designed for real-time prediction market trading and latency arbitrage on decentralized platforms such as Polymarket. PolySwarm deploys a swarm of 50 diverse LLM personas that concurrently evaluate binary outcome markets, aggregating individual probability estimates through confidence-weighted Bayesian combination of swarm consensus with market-implied probabilities, and applying quarter-Kelly position sizing for risk-controlled execution. The system incorporates an information-theoretic market analysis engine using Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence and Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence to detect cross-market inefficiencies and negation pair mispricings. A latency arbitrage module exploits stale Polymarket prices by deriving CEX-implied probabilities from a log-normal pricing model and executing trades within the human reaction-time window. We provide a full architectural description, implementation details, and evaluation methodology using Brier scores, calibration analysis, and log-loss metrics benchmarked against human superforecaster performance. We further discuss open challenges including hallucination in agent pools, computational cost at scale, regulatory exposure, and feedback-loop risk, and outline five priority directions for future research. Experimental results demonstrate that swarm aggregation consistently outperforms single-model baselines in probability calibration on Polymarket prediction tasks.2026-04-04T22:51:06Z13 pages, 3 figures, 3 tablesRajat M. BarotArjun S. Borkhatariyahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00292v2Economics of NFTs: The Value of Creator Royalties2026-04-03T12:13:16ZNon-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) are transforming how content creators, such as artists, price and sell their work. A key feature of NFTs is the inclusion of royalties, which grant creators a share of all future resale proceeds. Although widely used, critics argue that sophisticated speculators, who dominate NFT markets, simply price in royalties upfront, neutralizing their impact. We show this intuition holds only under perfect, frictionless markets. Under more realistic market conditions, royalties enable creators to capitalize on the presence of speculators in at least three ways: They can enable risk sharing (under risk aversion), mitigate information asymmetry (when speculators are better informed), and unlock price discrimination benefits (in multi-unit settings). Moreover, in all three cases, royalties meaningfully expand trade, implying increased transaction volume for platforms. These results offer testable predictions that can guide both empirical research and platform design.2022-12-01T05:35:23ZBrett Hemenway FalkGerry TsoukalasNiuniu Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02909v1Concave Continuation: Linking Routing to Arbitrage2026-04-03T09:26:41ZWe extend AMM trade functions to negative inputs via the \textit{concave continuation}, derived from the invariance of the local conservation law under allocation direction flips. This unifies routing and arbitrage into a single problem. We extend the one-hop transfer algorithm proposed in \cite{jiang} to this setting.2026-04-03T09:26:41ZRuichao JiangLong Wenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02035v1Reinforcement Learning for Speculative Trading under Exploratory Framework2026-04-02T13:41:05ZWe study a speculative trading problem within the exploratory reinforcement learning (RL) framework of Wang et al. [2020]. The problem is formulated as a sequential optimal stopping problem over entry and exit times under general utility function and price process. We first consider a relaxed version of the problem in which the stopping times are modeled by the jump times of Cox processes driven by bounded, non-randomized intensity controls. Under the exploratory formulation, the agent's randomized control is characterized via the probability measure over the jump intensities, and their objective function is regularized by Shannon's differential entropy. This yields a system of the exploratory HJB equations and Gibbs distributions in closed-form as the optimal policy. Error estimates and convergence of the RL objective to the value function of the original problem are established. Finally, an RL algorithm is designed, and its implementation is showcased in a pairs-trading application.2026-04-02T13:41:05Z37 pages, 14 figuresYun ZhaoAlex S. L. TseHarry Zhenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05326v4Riemannian Geometry of Optimal Rebalancing in Dynamic Weight Automated Market Makers2026-04-01T15:15:46ZWe show that when a dynamic-weight AMM rebalances by creating arbitrage opportunities, the per-step log loss is the KL divergence between successive weight vectors. The Fisher-Rao metric is therefore the natural Riemannian metric on the weight simplex. The loss-minimising interpolation under the leading-order expansion of this KL cost is SLERP (Spherical Linear Interpolation) in the Hellinger coordinates $η_i = \sqrt{w_i}$: a geodesic on the positive orthant of the unit sphere, traversed at constant speed. The SLERP midpoint equals the (AM+GM)/normalise heuristic of prior work (Willetts & Harrington, 2024), so the heuristic lies on the geodesic. This identity holds for any number of tokens and any magnitude of weight change; using this link, all dyadic points on the geodesic can be reached by recursive AM-GM bisection without trigonometric functions. SLERP's relative sub-optimality on the full KL cost is proportional to the squared magnitude of the overall weight change and to $1/f^2$, where $f$ is the number of interpolation steps. Under driftless GBM prices, the fractional value loss from each weight update is price-independent, and the cross term between weight and price changes telescopes, so the constant-price geometry carries over. LVR exposure introduces a finite optimal step count $f^*$, which lies in the perturbative regime where SLERP remains near-optimal.2026-03-05T16:06:50Z14 pages plus appendicesMatthew Willettshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00346v1Forecasting duration in high-frequency financial data using a self-exciting flexible residual point process2026-04-01T00:47:50ZThis paper presents a method for forecasting limit order book durations using a self-exciting flexible residual point process. High-frequency events in modern exchanges exhibit heavy-tailed interarrival times, posing a significant challenge for accurate prediction. The proposed approach incorporates the empirical distributional features of interarrival times while preserving the self-exciting and decay structure. This work also examines the stochastic stability of the process, which can be interpreted as a general state-space Markov chain. Under suitable conditions, the process is irreducible, aperiodic, positive Harris recurrent, and has a stationary distribution. An empirical study demonstrates that the model achieves strong predictive performance compared with several alternative approaches when forecasting durations in ultra-high-frequency trading data.2026-04-01T00:47:50ZKyungsub Leehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21672v3Mislearning of Factor Risk Premia under Structural Breaks: A Misspecified Bayesian Learning Framework2026-03-31T23:16:16ZWhile asset-pricing models increasingly recognize that factor risk premia are subject to structural change, existing literature typically assumes that investors correctly account for such instability. This paper studies how investors instead learn under a misspecified model that underestimates structural breaks. We propose a minimal Bayesian framework in which this misspecification generates persistent prediction errors and pricing distortions, and we introduce an empirically tractable measure of mislearning intensity $(Δ_t)$ based on predictive likelihood ratios.
The empirical results yield three main findings. First, in benchmark factor systems, elevated mislearning does not forecast a deterministic short-run collapse in performance; instead, it is associated with stronger long-horizon returns and Sharpe ratios, consistent with an equilibrium premium for acute model uncertainty. Second, in a broader anomaly universe, this pricing relation does not generalize uniformly: mislearning is more strongly associated with future drawdowns, downside semivolatility, and other measures of instability, with substantial heterogeneity across anomaly families. Third, the cross-sectional relation between instability and mislearning is inherently conditional: while a monotonic link between break-proneness and average mislearning does not hold in the full cross-section, it re-emerges in low-friction (low-IVOL) environments where break-state severity is more comparable across assets.2026-03-23T07:54:15ZYimeng Qiuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29763v1Option Pricing on Automated Market Maker Tokens2026-03-31T14:03:00ZWe derive the stochastic price process for tokens whose sole price discovery mechanism is a constant-product automated market maker (AMM). When the net flow into the pool follows a diffusion, the token price follows a constant elasticity of variance (CEV) process, nesting Black-Scholes as the limiting case of infinite liquidity. We obtain closed-form European option prices and introduce liquidity-adjusted Greeks. The CEV structure generates a leverage effect -- volatility rises as price falls -- whose normalized implied volatility skew depends only on the pool's weighting parameter, not on pool depth: Black-Scholes underprices 20%-out-of-the-money puts by roughly 6% in implied volatility terms at every pool depth, while the absolute pricing discrepancy vanishes as pools deepen. Empirically, after controlling for pool depth and flow volatility, realized return variance across 90 Bittensor subnets exhibits a strongly negative price elasticity, decisively rejecting geometric Brownian motion and consistent with the CEV prediction. A complementary delta-hedged backtest across 82 subnets confirms near-identical hedging errors at the money, consistent with the prediction that pricing differences are concentrated in the wings.2026-03-31T14:03:00Z33 pages, 9 figures, 3 tablesPhilip Z. Mayminhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28898v1Model Predictive Control For Trade Execution2026-03-30T18:25:52ZWe address the problem of executing large client orders in continuous double-auction markets under time and liquidity constraints. We propose a model predictive control (MPC) framework that balances three competing objectives: order completion, market impact, and opportunity cost. Our algorithm is guided by a trading schedule (such as time-weighted average price or volume-weighted average price) but allows for deviations to reduce the expected execution cost, with due regard to risk.
Our MPC algorithm executes the order progressively, and at each decision step it solves a fast quadratic program that trades off expected transaction cost against schedule deviation, while incorporating a residual cost term derived from a simple base policy. Approximate schedule adherence is maintained through explicit bounds, while variance constraints on deviation provide direct risk control. The resulting system is modular, data-driven, and suitable for deployment in production trading infrastructure.
Using six months of NASDAQ 'level 3' data and simulated orders, we show that our MPC approach reduces schedule shortfall by approximately 40-50% relative to spread-crossing benchmarks and achieves significant reductions in slippage. Moreover, augmenting the base policy with predictive price information further enhances performance, highlighting the framework's flexibility for integration with forecasting components.2026-03-30T18:25:52ZThomas P. McAuliffeSamuel LiewYuchao LiAndrey UsheninChihang WangAlexandros TasosJack PearceDimitris TasoulisDimitri P. BertsekasTheodoros Tsagarishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26290v1PEB Separation and State Migration: Unmasking the New Frontiers of DeFi AML Evasion2026-03-27T10:58:54ZTransfer-based anti-money laundering (AML) systems monitor token flows through transaction-graph abstractions, implicitly assuming that economically meaningful value migration is sufficiently encoded in transfer-layer connectivity. In this paper, we demonstrate that this assumption, the bedrock of current industrial forensics, fundamentally collapses in composable smart-contract ecosystems.
We formalize two structural mechanisms that undermine the completeness of transfer-layer attribution. First, we introduce Principal-Execution-Beneficiary (PEB) separation, where intent originators, transaction executors (e.g., MEV searchers), and ultimate beneficiaries are functionally decoupled. Second, we formalize state-mediated value migration, where economic coupling is enforced through invariant-driven contract state transitions (e.g., AMM reserve rebalancing) rather than explicit transfer continuity.
Through a real-world case study of role-separated limit order execution and a constructive cross-pool arbitrage model, we prove that these mechanisms render transfer-layer observation neither attribution-complete nor causally closed. We further argue that simply expanding transfer-layer tracing capabilities fails to resolve the underlying attribution ambiguity inherent in structurally decoupled execution. Under modular composition and open participation markets, these mechanisms are structurally generative, implying that heuristic-based flow tracing has reached a formal observational boundary. We advocate for a paradigm shift toward AML based on execution semantics, focusing on the restitution of economic causality from atomic execution logic and state invariants rather than static graph connectivity.2026-03-27T10:58:54ZYixin CaoXianfeng ChengYijie Liuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24137v1Bridging the Reality Gap in Limit Order Book Simulation2026-03-25T10:02:03ZWe introduce a practical, interactive simulator of the limit order book for large-tick assets, designed to produce realistic execution, costs, and P&L. The book state is projected onto a tractable representation based on spread and volume imbalance, enabling robust estimation from market data. Event timing is calibrated to reproduce the fine-scale temporal structure of real markets, revealing a pronounced mode at exchange round-trip latency consistent with simultaneous reactions and latency races among participants. We further incorporate a feedback mechanism that accumulates signed trade flow through a power-law decay kernel, reproducing both concave market impact during execution and partial post-trade reversion. Across several stocks and strategy case studies, the simulator yields realistic behavior where profitability becomes highly sensitive to execution parameters. We present the approach as a practical recipe: project, estimate, validate, adapt, for building realistic limit order book simulations.2026-03-25T10:02:03ZPatrick NobleMathieu RosenbaumSaad Souilmihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05594v2Multi-asset optimal trade execution with stochastic cross-effects: An Obizhaeva-Wang-type framework2026-03-24T23:48:02ZWe analyze a continuous-time optimal trade execution problem in multiple assets where the price impact and the resilience can be matrix-valued stochastic processes that incorporate cross-impact effects. In addition, we allow for stochastic terminal and running targets. Initially, we formulate the optimal trade execution task as a stochastic control problem with a finite-variation control process that acts as an integrator both in the state dynamics and in the cost functional. We then extend this problem continuously to a stochastic control problem with progressively measurable controls. By identifying this extended problem as equivalent to a certain linear-quadratic stochastic control problem, we can use established results in linear-quadratic stochastic control to solve the extended problem. This work generalizes [Ackermann, Kruse, Urusov; FinancStoch'24] from the single-asset setting to the multi-asset case. In particular, we reveal cross-hedging effects, showing that it can be optimal to trade in an asset despite having no initial position. Moreover, as a subsetting we discuss a multi-asset variant of the model in [Obizhaeva, Wang; JFinancMark'13].2025-03-07T17:22:33ZJulia AckermannThomas KruseMikhail Urusov