https://arxiv.org/api/7mE3CT+DIPQUc1xOVP05i5ycPHs 2026-06-13T11:04:06Z 2259 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13419v1 2026-06-11T14:49:42Z

An important question for an algo trader working an order is to understand if their actions are moving the market against them -- i.e., causing market impact. The conventional answer usually is one of two: (i) monitor price slippage in real-time, potentially reducing adverse activity with increased slippage, or (ii) do away with dynamic trading adjustments and rely on semi-static rules based on ex-post estimates of slippage over a large sample of events. Realtime monitoring fails because reliably estimating slippage is statistically expensive -- it requires hundreds of fills before it can be told apart from background volatility. More fundamentally however, it does not establish causality. Observed adverse price moves may be caused by the trader's own actions, or by an unrelated participant competing for the same liquidity and capturing the same alpha. The optimal response (say, slow down vs.\ speed up) is opposite in the two cases. We propose a method that detects price impact, on a per-action basis, by measuring the timing synchronicity between a trader's actions and subsequent adverse market events. The method at heart is a test for statistical \emph{surprise} in the timing of adverse events post trader action. We must be clear in that we do make a leap of faith here and assume that surprisingly fast adverse market events are evidence of causation and that the action triggered them -- a direct signature of impact and information leakage. Validating it requires real execution data; we set out the empirical tests that would do so.

2026-06-11T14:49:42Z Ilija I Zovko http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24242v2 2026-06-11T12:41:16Z

This paper develops a unified explicit solution theory for optimal execution through sequential limit-order placement in a limit order book. Rather than controlling only the trading speed of a metaorder, we determine how individual limit orders should be quoted over time. The model incorporates signal-dependent drift, price impact, inventory risk, and execution risk, with fills modeled by point processes whose intensities depend on the submitted quotes. We formulate four execution criteria: expected terminal wealth, expected terminal wealth with running inventory penalty, CARA utility of terminal wealth, and CARA utility with running inventory penalty. For general price-impact and inventory-penalty functions, we derive the corresponding HJB equations and show that all four problems reduce to a triangular finite-dimensional structure which can be solved explicitly, leading to fully explicit value functions and optimal quotes across all cases. We also prove well-posedness, admissibility, and verification results. The explicit formulas reveal connections between quoting strategies under different criteria, support long-horizon asymptotic analysis, and show numerically that signal-dependent drift can substantially affect optimal execution.

2026-05-22T21:36:45Z 48 pages, 11 figures Fenghui Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06717v2 2026-06-10T12:14:19Z

We propose a stochastic game modelling the strategic interaction between market makers and traders. From the trader's perspective, the conventional exogenous permanent price impact is replaced by the endogenous quoting strategies of the market makers. Conversely, from the market maker's perspective, order flows are no longer assumed to be exogenous, but are driven endogenously by the strategic traders. Characterizing the Nash equilibria via forward-backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs), we establish a local well-posedness result for the general game. For the specific `Almgren-Chriss-Avellaneda-Stoikov' model, the decoupling approach guarantees the global well-posedness of the FBSDEs by reducing it to a backward stochastic Riccati equation with $M_+$-matrix coefficients. Finally, by introducing small diffusion terms into the inventory processes as an approximation to the general game, we establish its global well-posedness. Simulations reveal a negative correlation between quotes and strategic orders, in contrast to the positive correlation observed between quotes and noise orders.

2025-04-09T09:18:37Z 42 pages Ivan Guo Shijia Jin http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01650v2 2026-06-10T01:00:57Z

We consider the problem of estimating the true Sharpe ratio of an asset selected for having the highest observed in-sample Sharpe ratio among many assets. We discuss estimators based on the polyhedral lemma, James Stein shrinkage, debiasing the expected maximum Sharpe ratio, thresholding and empirical Bayes. We test these estimators in simulations, computing bias and root mean square error across different values of sample size, number of assets, and spread and shape of population Sharpe ratios. We also compute rank correlation of the estimators against the underlying quantity, simulating how these estimators might be used to compare or rank the output of different teams which perform this selection process. We find that the James Stein estimator provides the best performance across many different realistic values of the relevant parameters, followed by the GMLEB estimator of Jiang and Zhang. These results are fairly robust to correlation of asset returns, with some caveats.

2026-06-01T03:58:35Z Steven E. Pav http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01477v3 2026-06-09T02:42:38Z

In inventory market making, the running-penalty coefficient $φ$ of the Cartea-Jaimungal framework and the risk-aversion parameter $γ$ of the Avellaneda-Stoikov framework are typically treated as independent free parameters, calibrated separately. We show that they are in fact not independent. A small set of axioms on the market maker's dynamic preference functional, namely cash-additivity, normalization, concavity, strong dynamic consistency, and law-invariance, forces the preference functional to be the entropic certainty-equivalent on liquidation-adjusted terminal wealth, parametrized by a single positive scalar $γ$. The Avellaneda-Stoikov framework is the unique representative of this axiom class. The Cartea-Jaimungal framework is its second-order Taylor expansion in inventory magnitude, with the running coefficient forced to $φ= γσ^2/2$ and (under a mild regularity condition on the liquidation cost) the terminal coefficient forced to $α= \frac{1}{2}L''(0)$. The two frameworks, typically presented as competing alternatives with the choice between them driven by tractability, are different manifestations of a single underlying object. The forced relation is invertible, $γ= 2φ/σ^2$, giving a consistency cross-check on independently calibrated desk parameters.

2026-05-31T22:32:48Z 63 pages, 1 figure (two panels). Submitted to Mathematical Finance Frank M. V. Feys http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20225v4 2026-06-08T15:54:18Z

Over the past decade, many dealers have implemented algorithmic models to automatically respond to RFQs and manage flows originating from their electronic platforms. In parallel, building on the foundational work of Ho and Stoll, and later Avellaneda and Stoikov, the academic literature on market making has expanded to address trade size distributions, client tiering, complex price dynamics, alpha signals, and the internalization versus externalization dilemma in markets with dealer-to-client and interdealer-broker segments. In this paper, we tackle two critical dimensions: adverse selection, arising from the presence of informed traders, and price reading, whereby the market maker's own quotes inadvertently reveal the direction of their inventory. These risks are well known to practitioners, who routinely face informed flows and algorithms capable of extracting signals from quoting behavior. Yet they have received limited attention in the quantitative finance literature, beyond stylized toy models with limited actionability. Extending the existing literature, we propose a tractable framework that enables market makers to adjust their quotes with greater awareness of informational risk.

2025-08-27T19:04:52Z Alexander Barzykin Philippe Bergault Olivier Guéant Malo Lemmel http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22142v2 2026-06-08T15:36:04Z

Manipulation of price benchmarks has cost hundreds of millions of dollars, making manipulation-resistant design a first-order question. A puzzling empirical pattern offers a starting point: benchmarks in traditional finance are typically means, those in decentralised finance medians. I rationalise this divide with a variable cost rising in each price distortion's size and a fixed cost per manipulated price. The optimal benchmark is a mean when fixed costs are negligible and variable costs convex, a median when variable costs are negligible, and otherwise a trimmed mean, with weights reflecting cost heterogeneity.

2025-06-27T11:39:18Z Ángel Hernando-Veciana http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09564v1 2026-06-08T14:38:58Z

We consider the role of a continuum operational time u and its mapping to calendar time t and how these relate to event time for option pricing problems. We derive option-pricing equations from an operational-time Markov lattice rather than from a calendar-time diffusion. The primitive model is a nearest-neighbour log-price lattice with state- and time-dependent transition probabilities. Its Chapman-Kolmogorov decomposition yields discrete forward and backward equations, which converge under local finite-variance scaling to the usual continuum adjoint pair. In price variables, the backward equation gives a generalized European pricing PDE and reduces to Black-Scholes-Merton under the risk-neutral drift restriction and constant volatility. Interpreted as a reaction-boundary model for limit-order-book mid-prices, the construction identifies local volatility with an activity-rescaled risk-neutral bid-ask reaction-boundary variance. The framework separates the operational kernel, calendar-time projection, and pricing-measure choice, to clarify how unspanned clock, jump, or renewal risks can lead to incomplete-market pricing.

2026-06-08T14:38:58Z Working paper:18 pages, 1 Table, 2 Figures, a short outlined calculation in an appendix Chris Angstmann Tim Gebbie http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09478v1 2026-06-08T13:36:57Z

This study investigates whether regime-dependent volatility forecasting and machine-learning-based return prediction can be jointly integrated to improve both statistical forecasting performance and economic strategy outcomes in equity markets. Using high-frequency CSI 300 Index data from 2005 to 2023, a sequential twostage framework is developed. In the first stage, realized volatility is modeled using regime-augmented HARQ specifications combined with Markov-switching GJR-GARCH filtering to capture long-memory dynamics, asymmetry, and structural market regimes. In the second stage, volatility forecasts, regime indicators, and return-related predictors are incorporated into an XGBoost return-prediction model estimated through a strictly walk-forward out-of-sample procedure. The empirical results demonstrate that regime-aware volatility forecasting consistently outperforms baseline HARQ models across forecast evaluation metrics and is generally supported by formal forecast comparison tests. In contrast, return predictability remains weak, state-dependent, and concentrated primarily in low-volatility regimes. Although naive predictive trading strategies generally fail after accounting for realistic transaction costs, carefully designed implementations incorporating volatility scaling, low-volatility gating, threshold calibration, and turnover controls can improve defensive economic performance. The findings suggest that the practical value of predictive systems in financial markets may depend less on generating strong unconditional return forecasts and more on transforming weak state-dependent signals into economically robust portfolio allocation rules. Overall, the study contributes by integrating econometric volatility modeling, regime classification, machine-learning return prediction, and implementation realism within a unified framework.

2026-06-08T13:36:57Z 41 pages, 16 figures, 21 tables Xinyue Fang Robert Ślepaczuk http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09454v1 2026-06-08T13:04:06Z

This paper axiomatizes the bid-ask market maker's quoting rule. A quoting rule maps the maker's state, namely inventory, belief, variance, trade intensity, and informed-trader fraction, to a bid-ask pair. Eight natural axioms, together with six environmental assumptions on the maker's inventory cost, force a unique three-parameter family: the mid-quote is linear in inventory, and the spread decomposes additively into inventory and adverse-selection components. Each of the three parameters is identified from a distinct moment of the observable quoting rule, with the three identifications mutually decoupled. The eight axioms partition into a four-axiom indispensable core, one structural choice, and three modularity extensions. Two structural corollaries follow: the latent inventory cost function is recoverable from the limit order book, and a sharp phase transition separates a functioning regime from a frozen one. A closing meta-theorem identifies four features invariant across all admissible structural primitives within the axiom system. To our knowledge, this is the first forced-uniqueness axiomatization of the quoting rule.

2026-06-08T13:04:06Z 66 pages, 3 figures Frank M. V. Feys http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04217v2 2026-06-08T11:47:35Z

We introduce the Polymarket-v1 Database: the complete on-chain trade archive of Polymarket's first-generation CTF Exchange on Polygon, spanning 2022-11-21 to 2026-04-28 and covering the full contract lifecycle from first settlement to natural termination. The dataset comprises 1.20 billion trade records across 1.30 million markets with $61 billion in nominal volume. Its defining feature is 100% ground-truth aggressor direction derived from the blockchain settlement layer, a property unavailable in existing prediction market archives, which rely on heuristic inference. We use this truth-aligned archive to benchmark standard microstructure tools and document three findings. First, the tick rule and bulk volume classification achieve near-random aggregate accuracy (49.83% and 50.51%), but this masks a systematic, correctable price-level gradient driven by positive trade direction autocorrelation and concentrated market-making -- two structural features of prediction markets that violate the mean-reversion assumption embedded in classical classifiers. Second, these classification errors propagate into downstream metrics: inferred VPIN diverges substantially from ground-truth VPIN, and OFI estimates are directionally biased, with material consequences for Transaction Cost Analysis. Third, ground-truth microstructure quality predicts forecasting performance in ways that classification-based proxies cannot recover: True VPIN positively predicts Brier scores, while Gibbs spread negatively predicts them -- a selection effect reflecting that high-spread niche markets attract informed specialists rather than noise traders. Replacing ground-truth metrics with classified proxies attenuates both relationships, illustrating that measurement accuracy at the transaction level is a prerequisite for reliable inference about prediction market design and probability calibration.

2026-06-02T21:06:27Z 35 pages, 17 figures, 15 tables. Dataset available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/TimeSeventeen/Polymarket-v1 Boka Qin Rui Yang http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09003v1 2026-06-08T04:03:17Z

We consider the interaction between centralized trading and decentralized Proof of Stake (PoS) blockchain ecosystems. Motivated by the increasing dominance of centralized exchanges and the institutionalization of crypto markets, we study how trading activities on centralized exchanges affect staking behavior, token allocation, and decentralization within a PoS blockchain. We formulate a continuous-time mean field model, where the miners simultaneously act as validators in the PoS protocol and traders in a centralized market with price impact. Under suitable assumptions, we establish the local well-posedness of the mean field system, and derive a semi-explicit characterization of the equilibrium trading strategy. Numerical results suggest that centralized trading activities may enhance staking participation, and promote decentralization of the staking distribution through market incentives. We also study the effects of transaction costs and token supply mechanisms on the equilibrium staking ratio and concentration profile. These results illustrate how market microstructure and centralized liquidity provision can exert significant influence on decentralized blockchain protocols.

2026-06-08T04:03:17Z 18 pages Wenpin Tang http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12591v2 2026-06-07T05:54:11Z

This study explores the design of an efficient rebate policy in auction markets, focusing on a continuous-time setting with competition among market participants. In this model, a stock exchange collects transaction fees from auction investors executing block trades to buy or sell a risky asset, then redistributes these fees as rebates to competing market makers submitting limit orders. Market makers influence both the price at which the asset trades and their arrival intensity in the auction. We frame this problem as a principal-multi-agent problem and provide necessary and sufficient conditions to characterize the Nash equilibrium among market makers. The exchange's optimization problem is formulated as a high-dimensional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation with Poisson jump processes, which is solved using a verification result. To numerically compute the optimal rebate and transaction fee policies, we apply the Deep BSDE method. Our results show that optimal transaction fees and rebate structures improve market efficiency by narrowing the spread between the auction clearing price and the asset's fundamental value, while ensuring a minimal gain for both market makers indexed on the price of the asset on a coexisting limit order book.

2025-01-22T02:34:43Z Thibaut Mastrolia Tianrui Xu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08379v1 2026-06-07T00:20:29Z

This study addresses the optimal execution of large stock sell programs by introducing TT-DAC-PS (Twin-Target Deterministic Actor-Critic with Policy Smoothing), a deterministic actor-critic architecture that combines twin exponential-moving-average critic targets with pessimistic min backup, TD3-style target policy smoothing noise, delayed actor updates, and conservative Q regularisation to curb overestimation. Exploration uses Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) noise with a hybrid schedule: deterministic episode-wise decay, variance-guided adjustment based on recent reward dispersion, and a Soft Actor-Critic (SAC)-style temperature that is learned and mapped to the noise scale. The environment integrates Almgren-Chriss (AC) trade impact with Limit Order Book (LOB) prices and volumes, normalised state features, per-step volume participation caps, and a utility-based reward. The trade execution algorithm is applied to LOB data for ten U.S. stocks. Performance is assessed against reinforcement-learning baseline algorithms, including Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO), Soft Actor-Critic (SAC), and Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C), as well as alternative trade execution algorithms, including Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP), Volume-Weighted Average Price (VWAP), and AC. The proposed model consistently reduces mean implementation shortfall percentage with competitive variance, outperforming classical baselines and standard reinforcement-learning benchmark models.

2026-06-07T00:20:29Z 21 pages, 1 figure, 3 tables Ilia Zaznov Atta Badii Julian Kunkel Alfonso Dufour http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08285v1 2026-06-06T18:14:29Z

Large language models (LLMs) and agentic systems are increasingly proposed for financial trading, yet their reported performance remains difficult to compare because studies vary in data provenance, temporal split discipline, execution timing, turnover treatment, and transaction-cost modeling. This article presents a targeted topical review and reproducibility audit of execution realism in LLM-based trading research. A coded evidence matrix covering 30 trade-relevant primary studies is used to assess point-in-time controls, split transparency, held-out evaluation, cost and turnover treatment, execution semantics, universe definition, and artifact release. Across the audited sample, architecture reporting is generally clearer than the evaluation assumptions needed to judge whether a trading result is economically interpretable or reproducible. A 10-equity worked example is included only as a methodological scaffold to illustrate how explicit friction and timing choices can materially compress active-strategy results. The main conclusion is that the next useful step for LLM trading research is not only better agent design, but also clearer reporting standards for execution realism, reproducibility, and evaluation comparability.

2026-06-06T18:14:29Z Junyi Yao Zihao Zheng