https://arxiv.org/api/7mE3CT+DIPQUc1xOVP05i5ycPHs 2026-03-20T09:05:10Z 2162 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04867v2 2026-03-19T08:19:43Z

We investigate the well-posedness in the Hadamard sense and the absence of price manipulation in the optimal execution problem within the Almgren-Chriss framework, where the temporary and permanent impact parameters vary deterministically over time. We present sufficient conditions for the existence of a unique solution and provide second-order conditions for the problem, with a particular focus on scenarios where impact parameters change monotonically over time. Additionally, we establish conditions to prevent transaction-triggered price manipulation in the optimal solution, i.e. the occurence of buying and selling in the same trading program. Our findings are supported by numerical analyses that explore various regimes in simple parametric settings for the dynamics of impact parameters.

2024-10-07T09:33:30Z 33 pages, & figures Gianluca Palmari Fabrizio Lillo Zoltan Eisler http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16434v1 2026-03-17T12:14:47Z

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at general code generation, yet translating natural-language trading intents into correct option strategies remains challenging. Real-world option design requires reasoning over massive, multi-dimensional option chain data with strict constraints, which often overwhelms direct generation methods. We introduce the Option Query Language (OQL), a domain-specific intermediate representation that abstracts option markets into high-level primitives under grammatical rules, enabling LLMs to function as reliable semantic parsers rather than free-form programmers. OQL queries are then validated and executed deterministically by an engine to instantiate executable strategies. We also present a new dataset for this task and demonstrate that our neuro-symbolic pipeline significantly improves execution accuracy and logical consistency over direct baselines.

2026-03-17T12:14:47Z Haochen Luo Zhengzhao Lai Junjie Xu Yifan Li Tang Pok Hin Yuan Zhang Chen Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16333v1 2026-03-17T10:04:14Z

We study optimal auction design for Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) auction markets on Ethereum. Using a dataset of 2.2 million transactions across three major orderflow providers, we establish three empirical regularities: extracted values follow a log-normal distribution with extreme right-tail concentration, competition intensity varies substantially across MEV types, and the standard Revenue Equivalence Theorem breaks down due to affiliation among searchers' valuations. We model this affiliation through a Gaussian common factor, deriving equilibrium bidding strategies and expected revenues for five auction formats, first-price sealed-bid, second-price sealed-bid, English, Dutch, and all-pay, across a fine grid of bidder counts $n$ and affiliation parameters $ρ$. Our simulations confirm the Milgrom-Weber linkage principle: English and second-price sealed-bid auctions strictly dominate Dutch and first-price sealed-bid formats for any $ρ> 0$, with a linkage gap of 14-28\% at moderate affiliation ($ρ=0.5$) and up to 30\% for small bidder counts. Applied to observed bribe totals, this gap corresponds to \$10-18 million in foregone revenue over the sample period. We also document a novel non-monotonicity: at large $n$ and high $ρ$, revenue peaks in the interior of the affiliation parameter space and declines thereafter, as near-perfect correlation collapses the order-statistic spread that drives competitive payments.

2026-03-17T10:04:14Z Aleksei Adadurov Sergey Barseghyan Anton Chtepine Antero Eloranta Andrei Sebyakin Arsenii Valitov http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15963v1 2026-03-16T22:25:42Z

Auto-deleveraging (ADL) mechanisms are a critical yet understudied component of risk management on cryptocurrency futures exchanges. When available margin and other loss-absorbing resources are insufficient to cover losses following large price moves, exchanges reduce positions and socialize losses among solvent participants via rule-based ADL protocols. We formulate ADL as an optimization problem that minimizes the exchange's risk of loss arising from future equity shortfalls. In a single-asset, isolated-margin setting, we show that under a risk-neutral expected loss objective the unique optimal policy minimizes the maximum leverage among participants. The resulting design has a transparent structure: positions are reduced first for the most highly levered accounts, and leverage is progressively equalized via a water-filling (or ``leverage-draining'') rule. This policy is distribution-free, wash-trade resistant, Sybil resistant, and path-independent. It provides a canonical and implementable benchmark for ADL design and clarifies the economic logic underlying queue-based mechanisms used in practice. We further study the multi-asset, cross-margin setting, where the ADL problem becomes genuinely multi-dimensional: the exchange must allocate a vector of required reductions across accounts with portfolios exposed to correlated price moves. We show that under an expected-loss objective the problem remains separable across accounts after introducing asset-level shadow prices, yielding a scalable numerical method. We observe that naive gross leverage can be misleading in this context as it ignores hedging within portfolios. When asset prices are driven by a single dominant risk factor, the optimal policy again takes a water-filling form, but now in a factor-adjusted notion of leverage, so that more effectively hedged portfolios are deleveraged less aggressively.

2026-03-16T22:25:42Z Steven Campbell Natascha Hey Ciamac C. Moallemi Marcel Nutz http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14453v1 2026-03-15T15:57:29Z

Trend-following strategies underpin many systematic trading approaches yet struggle under nonstationary and nonlinear market regimes. We propose an LSTM-based framework to forecast next-day trend differences ($Δ_t$) for the top 30 S\&P 500 equities, validated across market cycles (2005--2025). Key contributions include: (i) formal proof of bias-variance reduction via differencing, (ii) exhaustive empirical benchmarks against OLS, Ridge, and Lasso, (iii) portfolio simulations confirming economic gains in terms of overall PNL compared to other models like OLS, Ridge, Lasso or LightGBM Regressor

2026-03-15T15:57:29Z 8 pages Harris Buchanan Eric Benhamou http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15612v3 2026-03-13T00:42:45Z

Decentralized prediction markets (DePMs) allow open participation in event-based wagering without fully relying on centralized intermediaries. We review the history of DePMs which date back to 2011 and includes hundreds of proposals. Perhaps surprising, modern DePMs like Polymarket deviate materially from earlier designs like Truthcoin and Augur v1. We use our review to present a modular workflow comprising eight stages: underlying infrastructure, market topic, share structure and pricing, market initialization, trading, market resolution, settlement, and archiving. For each module, we enumerate the design variants, analyzing trade-offs around decentralization, expressiveness, and manipulation resistance. We also identify open problems for researchers interested in this ecosystem.

2025-10-17T12:59:47Z Nahid Rahman Joseph Al-Chami Jeremy Clark http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20771v2 2026-03-12T09:09:06Z

We demonstrate market inefficiency in cryptoasset markets. Our approach examines investments that share a dominant risk factor but differ in their exposure to a secondary risk. We derive equilibrium restrictions that must hold regardless of how investors price either risk. Our empirical results strongly reject these necessary equilibrium restrictions. The rejection implies market inefficiency that cannot be attributed to mispriced risk, suggesting the presence of frictions that impede capital reallocation.

2026-02-24T11:03:39Z Joel Hasbrouck Julian Ma Fahad Saleh Caspar Schwarz-Schilling http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09669v1 2026-03-10T13:41:31Z

We find an approximate Nash equilibrium in a game between decentralized exchanges (DEXs) that compete for order flow by setting dynamic trading fees. We characterize the equilibrium via a coupled system of partial differential equations and derive tractable approximate closed-form expressions for the equilibrium fees. Our analysis shows that the two-regime structure found in monopoly models persists under competition: pools alternate between raising fees to deter arbitrage and lowering fees to attract noise trading and increase volatility. Under competition, however, the switching boundary shifts from the oracle price to a weighted average of the oracle and competitors' exchange rates. Our numerical experiments show that, holding total liquidity fixed, an increase in the number of competing DEXs reduces execution slippage for strategic liquidity takers and lowers fee revenue per DEX. Finally, the effect on noise traders' slippage depends on market activity: they are worse off in low-activity markets but better off in high-activity ones.

2026-03-10T13:41:31Z Leonardo Baggiani Martin Herdegen Leandro Sanchez-Betancourt http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05326v2 2026-03-09T18:38:36Z

In Temporal Function Market Making (TFMM), a dynamic weight AMM pool rebalances from initial to final holdings by creating a series of arbitrage opportunities whose total cost depends on the weight trajectory taken. We show that the per-step arbitrage loss is the KL divergence between new and old weight vectors, meaning the Fisher--Rao metric is the natural Riemannian metric on the weight simplex. The loss-minimising interpolation under the leading-order expansion of this KL cost is SLERP (Spherical Linear Interpolation) in the Hellinger coordinates $η_i = \sqrt{w_i}$, i.e. a geodesic on the positive orthant of the unit sphere traversed at constant speed. The SLERP midpoint equals the (AM+GM)/normalise heuristic of prior work (Willetts & Harrington, 2024), so the heuristic lies on the geodesic. This identity holds for any number of tokens and any magnitude of weight change; using this link, all dyadic points on the geodesic can be reached by recursive AM-GM bisection without trigonometric functions. SLERP's relative sub-optimality on the full KL cost is proportional to the squared magnitude of the overall weight change and to $1/f^2$, where $f$ is the number of interpolation steps.

2026-03-05T16:06:50Z 12 pages plus appendices Matthew Willetts http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19419v2 2026-03-07T03:43:02Z

Concentrated liquidity provision in decentralized exchanges presents a fundamental Impulse Control problem. Liquidity Providers (LPs) face a non-trivial trade-off between maximizing fee accrual through tight price-range concentration and minimizing the friction costs of rebalancing, including gas fees and swap slippage. Existing methods typically employ heuristic or threshold strategies that fail to account for market dynamics. This paper formulates liquidity management as an optimal control problem and derives the corresponding Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality (HJB-QVI). We present an approximate solution RAmmStein, a Deep Reinforcement Learning method that incorporates the mean-reversion speed (theta) of an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process among other features as input to the model. We demonstrate that the agent learns to separate the state space into regions of action and inaction. We further extend the framework with RAmmStein-Width, which jointly optimizes rebalancing timing and position width via a 6-action DDQN. We evaluate the framework using high-frequency 1Hz Coinbase trade data comprising over 6.8M trades on a realistic environment (10M TVL, 1% default width). Experimental results show that RAmmStein achieves a net ROI of 1.60%, the highest among all realistic (non-omniscient) strategies, while greedy strategies lose up to -8.4% to gas costs. Notably, the agent reduces rebalancing frequency by 85% compared to greedy rebalancing. RAmmStein-Width discovers extreme parsimony on its own, executing only 9 rebalances and $40 in gas, and degrades more slowly than all active strategies at elevated gas costs. Our results demonstrate that regime-aware laziness can significantly improve capital efficiency by preserving the returns that would otherwise be eroded by the operational costs.

2026-02-23T01:25:16Z 13 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables, 1 algorithm; an earlier version submitted to Designing DeFi workshop (https://www.designingdefi.xyz/) Pranay Anchuri http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21125v2 2026-03-06T22:01:12Z

We generalize the seminal framework of Kyle (1985) to a many-asset setting, bridging the gap between informed-trading theory and modern trading practices. Specifically, we formulate an infinite-dimensional Bayesian trading game in which the informed trader's private information may concern arbitrary aspects of the cross-sectional payoff structure across a continuum of traded assets. In this general setting, we obtain a parsimonious equilibrium characterized by a single scalar fixed point, which yields closed-form characterizations of equilibrium trading strategy, price impact within and across markets, and the information efficiency of equilibrium prices.

2026-02-24T17:22:35Z Christian Keller Michael C. Tseng http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07227v3 2026-03-06T04:38:51Z

Stablecoins have historically depegged due from par to large sales, possibly of speculative nature, or poor reserve asset quality. Using a global game which addresses both concerns, we show that the selling pressure on stablecoin holders increases in the presence of a large sale. While precise public knowledge reduces (increases) the probability of a run when fundamentals are strong (weak), interestingly, more precise private signals increase (reduce) the probability of a run when fundamentals are strong (weak), potentially explaining the stability of opaque stablecoins. The total run probability can be decomposed into components representing risks from large sales and poor collateral. By analyzing how these risk components vary with respect to information uncertainty and fundamentals, we can split the fundamental space into regions based on the type of risk a stablecoin issuer is more prone to. We suggest testable implications and connect our model's implications to real-world applications, including depegging events and the no-questions-asked property of money.

2024-07-23T19:37:02Z Brian Zhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07711v6 2026-03-04T09:31:44Z

In this work, we aim to reconcile several apparently contradictory observations in market microstructure: is the famous "square-root law" of metaorder impact, which decays with time, compatible with the random-walk nature of prices and the linear impact of order imbalances? Can one entirely explain the volatility of prices as resulting from the flow of uninformed metaorders that mechanically impact them? We introduce a new theoretical framework to describe metaorders with different signs, sizes and durations, which all impact prices as a square-root of volume but with a subsequent time decay. We show that, as in the original propagator model, price diffusion is ensured by the long memory of cross-correlations between metaorders. In order to account for the effect of strongly fluctuating volumes q of individual trades, we further introduce two q-dependent exponents, which allow us to describe how the moments of generalized volume imbalance and the correlation between price changes and generalized order flow imbalance scale with T. We predict in particular that the corresponding power-laws depend in a non-monotonic fashion on a parameter a, which allows one to put the same weight on all child orders or to overweight large ones, a behaviour that is clearly borne out by empirical data. We also predict that the correlation between price changes and volume imbalances should display a maximum as a function of a, which again matches observations. Such noteworthy agreement between theory and data suggests that our framework correctly captures the basic mechanism at the heart of price formation, namely the average impact of metaorders. We argue that our results support the "Order-Driven" theory of excess volatility, and are at odds with the idea that a "Fundamental" component accounts for a large share of the volatility of financial markets.

2025-06-09T12:53:25Z Guillaume Maitrier Jean-Philippe Bouchaud http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03671v1 2026-03-04T02:56:29Z

Some investors say increasing investors with the same strategy decreasing their profits per an investor. On the other hand, some investors using technical analysis used to use same strategy and parameters with other investors, and say that it is better. Those argues are conflicted each other because one argues using with same strategy decreases profits but another argues it increase profits. However, those arguments have not been investigated yet. In this study, the agent-based artificial financial market model(ABAFMM) was built by adding "additional agents"(AAs) that includes additional fundamental agents (AFAs) and additional technical agents (ATAs) to the prior model. The AFAs(ATAs) trade obeying simple fundamental(technical) strategy having only the one parameter. We investigated earnings of AAs when AAs increased. We found that in the case with increasing AFAs, market prices are made stable that leads to decrease their profits. In the case with increasing ATAs, market prices are made unstable that leads to gain their profits more.

2026-03-04T02:56:29Z Takanobu Mizuta Isao Yagi http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19838v3 2026-03-03T19:10:21Z

We study the economic viability of liquidity provision in decentralised exchanges (DEXs) within a structural framework in which market outcomes are endogenous. We formulate strategic interactions as a sequential game: a risk-averse liquidity provider (LP) sets the supply of liquidity in the DEX and a costly dynamic replication strategy in a centralised exchange (CEX), price-sensitive traders determine trading volumes, and arbitrageurs align prices. We establish existence of equilibrium under general trading functions. We show that DEX liquidity depth is a central instrument for risk management, because the LP adjusts liquidity ex ante to manage exposure. In addition to the classical trade-off between liquidity demand and adverse selection, we identify two further determinants of the viability of liquidity provision: the ratio of risk aversion to replication costs and private information. The ratio governs the aggressiveness of replication: greater relative risk aversion reduces risk but also lowers equilibrium liquidity and its mean profitability. Private information has a non-monotonic effect. For moderate price movements, speculative benefits increase liquidity. For large price movements, anticipated adverse selection and replication costs lead to thinner markets.

2025-12-22T19:46:23Z Fayçal Drissi Xuchen Wu Sebastian Jaimungal