https://arxiv.org/api/uey86t+Zc7RjyktLsOEmagV9Zlc 2026-03-20T14:28:12Z 2819 45 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10900v2 2026-03-04T13:15:15Z

The classical theory of efficient allocations of an aggregate endowment in a pure-exchange economy has hitherto primarily focused on the Pareto-efficiency of allocations, under the implicit assumption that transfers between agents are frictionless, and hence costless to the economy. In this paper, we argue that certain transfers cause frictions that result in costs to the economy. We show that these frictional costs are tantamount to a form of subadditivity of the cost of transferring endowments between agents. We suggest an axiomatic study of allocation mechanisms, that is, the mechanisms that transform feasible allocations into other feasible allocations, in the presence of such transfer costs. Among other results, we provide an axiomatic characterization of those allocation mechanisms that admit representations as robust (worst-case) linear allocation mechanisms, as well as those mechanisms that admit representations as worst-case conditional expectations. We call the latter Robust Conditional Mean Allocation mechanisms, and we relate our results to the literature on (decentralized) risk sharing within a pool of agents.

2024-04-16T20:40:32Z Mario Ghossoub Giulio Principi Ruodu Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03213v1 2026-03-03T18:06:56Z

The Total Portfolio Approach and Strategic Asset Allocation are widely viewed as competing frameworks for institutional portfolio management. We argue they differ in a single governance parameter: the tracking error constraint. Using U.S. equity and bond data from 2000 to 2026, with portfolio simulations spanning 2004 to 2026, we show that Sharpe ratios are statistically indistinguishable across the full constraint spectrum while the volatility of realized tracking error varies approximately 12-fold. The cost of constraints spikes during crises, when forward returns are richest and governance pressure to de-risk is strongest. Dynamic tracking error subsumes both approaches and provides boards with a more productive framework for investment governance.

2026-03-03T18:06:56Z 56 pages, 7 exhibits Ashwin Alankar Allan Maymin Philip Maymin Myron Scholes Sujiang Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19276v2 2026-03-03T15:55:29Z

We introduce a new paradigm for risk sharing that generalizes earlier models based on discrete agents and extends them to allow for sharing risk within a continuum of agents. Agents are represented by points of a measure space and have potentially heterogeneous risk preferences modeled by risk measures on a separable probability space. We derive the dual representation of the value function using a Strassen-type theorem for the weak-star topology and provide a characterization of the acceptance set using Aumann integration. These results are illustrated by explicit formulas when risk preferences are within the family of entropic and expected shortfall risk measures, and applications to Pareto efficiency in large markets.

2025-05-25T19:17:53Z Vasily Melnikov http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01821v1 2026-03-02T12:53:29Z

We study a dynamic model of a non-life insurance portfolio. The foundation of the model is a compound Poisson process that represents the claims side of the insurer. To introduce clusters of claims appearing, e.g. with catastrophic events, this process is time-changed by a Lévy subordinator. The subordinator is chosen so that it evolves, on average, at the same speed as calendar time, creating a trade-off between intensity and severity. We show that such a transformation always has a negative impact on the probability of ruin. Despite the expected total claim amount remaining invariant, it turns out that the probability of ruin as a function of the initial capital falls arbitrarily slowly depending on the choice of the subordinator.

2026-03-02T12:53:29Z Jonathan Klinge Maren Diane Schmeck http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01434v1 2026-03-02T04:29:21Z

The conditional mean risk-sharing (CMRS) rule is an important tool for distributing aggregate losses across individual risks, but its implementation in continuous multivariate models typically requires complicated multidimensional integrals. We develop a framework to compute CMRS allocations from the joint Laplace--Stieltjes transform of the risk vector. The LSTs of the allocation measures $ν_i(B)=\mathbb{E}[X_i\boldsymbol{1}_{\{S\in B\}}]$ are expressed as partial derivatives of the joint LST evaluated on the diagonal $t_1=\cdots=t_n$. When densities exist, this yields one-dimensional Laplace inversions for $f_S$ and $ξ_i$, and hence $h_i(s)=ξ_i(s)/f_S(s)$ on the absolutely continuous part, providing closed-form or semi-analytic solutions for a broad class of distributions. We also develop numerical inversion methods for cases where analytic inversion is unavailable. We introduce an exponential tilting procedure to stabilize numerical inversion in low-probability aggregate events. We provide several examples to illustrate the approach, including in some high-dimensional settings where existing approaches are infeasible.

2026-03-02T04:29:21Z Christopher Blier-Wong http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01232v1 2026-03-01T19:05:31Z

We study submodularity for law-invariant functionals, with special attention to convex risk measures. Expected losses are modular, and certainty equivalents are submodular if and only if the underlying loss function is convex. Law-invariant coherent risk measures are submodular if and only if they are coherent distortion risk measures, which include the class of Expected Shortfall (ES). We proceed to consider four classes of convex risk measures with explicit formulas. For shortfall risk measures, we give a complete characterization through an inequality on the Arrow--Pratt measure of risk aversion. The optimized certainty equivalents are always submodular, whereas for the adjusted Expected Shortfall (AES) with a nonconvex penalty function, submodularity forces reduction to a standard ES. Within a subclass of monotone mean-deviation risk measures, submodularity can hold only in coherent distortion cases. In an empirical study of daily US equity returns using rolling historical estimation, no ES submodularity violations are observed, as expected from the exact ES structure of the estimator; VaR shows persistent violations linked to market stress, and AES shows a small percentage of violations.

2026-03-01T19:05:31Z Ruodu Wang Jingcheng Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01157v1 2026-03-01T15:42:52Z

Risk forecasts in financial regulation and internal management are calculated through historical data. The unknown structural changes of financial data poses a substantial challenge in selecting an appropriate look-back window for risk modeling and forecasting. We develop a data-driven online learning method, called the bootstrap-based adaptive window selection (BAWS), that adaptively determines the window size in a sequential manner. A central component of BAWS is to compare the realized scores against a data-dependent threshold, which is evaluate based on an idea of bootstrap. The proposed method is applicable to the forecast of risk measures that are elicitable individually or jointly, such as the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and the pair of the VaR and the corresponding Expected Shortfall. Through simulation studies and empirical analyses, we demonstrate that BAWS generally outperforms the standard rolling window approach and the recently developed method of stability-based adaptive window selection, especially when there are structural changes in the data-generating process.

2026-03-01T15:42:52Z Yinhuan Li Chenxin Lyu Ruodu Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.24194v1 2026-02-27T17:17:52Z

This paper examines the impact of introducing a Rank-Dependent Utility (RDU) agent into a von Neumann-Morgenstern (vNM) pure-exchange economy with no aggregate uncertainty. In the absence of the RDU agent, the classical theory predicts that Pareto-optimal allocations are full-insurance, or no-betting, allocations. We show how the probability weighting function of the RDU agent, seen as a proxy for probabilistic risk aversion that is not captured by marginal utility of wealth, can lead to Pareto optima characterized by endogenous betting, despite common baseline beliefs. Such endogenous betting at an optimum leads to uncertainty-generating trade arising purely from heterogeneity in the perception of risk, rather than in beliefs. Our results formalize the intuitive understanding that probability weighting can act as an endogenous source of belief heterogeneity, and provide a new behavioral foundation for the coexistence of common beliefs and speculative behavior, in an environment with no initial aggregate uncertainty. Interpreting the RDU agent's nonlinear weighting function as an ``internality'' prompts the question of whether a social planner should intervene. We show how a benevolent social planner can nudge the RDU agent to behave closer to a vNM agent, through costly statistical or financial education, thereby (partially) restoring the optimality of full-insurance allocations.

2026-02-27T17:17:52Z Patrick Beissner Tim Boonen Mario Ghossoub http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06235v2 2026-02-27T17:03:14Z

To comply with increasingly stringent international standards in risk management and regulation, several approaches have been developed in the literature for forecasting tail-risk measures such as Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES). However, the accuracy of these measures can be significantly affected by multiple sources of uncertainty, including model misspecification, data limitations and estimation procedures. To address these challenges and enhance the predictive performance of individual models, this study introduces novel forecast combination strategies based on the Model Confidence Set (MCS) methodology. Specifically, a strictly consistent joint VaR-ES loss function is employed to identify the best-performing models, which constitute the Set of Superior Models (SSM). Subsequently, the VaR and ES forecasts of the models included in the SSM are combined using various weighting schemes. An empirical analysis based on nine stock market indices at the 2.5\% and 1\% risk levels provides evidence that the proposed combined predictors are a robust alternative for forecasting tail-risk measures, successfully passing standard backtests and consistently entering the SSM of the MCS.

2024-06-10T13:06:13Z Alessandra Amendola Vincenzo Candila Antonio Naimoli Giuseppe Storti http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07048v2 2026-02-27T06:38:12Z

Prediction markets provide a unique setting where event-level time series are directly tied to natural-language descriptions, yet discovering robust lead-lag relationships remains challenging due to spurious statistical correlations. We propose a hybrid two-stage causal screener to address this challenge: (i) a statistical stage that uses Granger causality to identify candidate leader-follower pairs from market-implied probability time series, and (ii) an LLM-based semantic stage that re-ranks these candidates by assessing whether the proposed direction admits a plausible economic transmission mechanism based on event descriptions. Because causal ground truth is unobserved, we evaluate the ranked pairs using a fixed, signal-triggered trading protocol that maps relationship quality into realized profit and loss (PnL). On Kalshi Economics markets, our hybrid approach consistently outperforms the statistical baseline. Across rolling evaluations, the win rate increases from 51.4% to 54.5%. Crucially, the average magnitude of losing trades decreases substantially from 649 USD to 347 USD. This reduction is driven by the LLM's ability to filter out statistically fragile links that are prone to large losses, rather than relying on rare gains. These improvements remain stable across different trading configurations, indicating that the gains are not driven by specific parameter choices. Overall, the results suggest that LLMs function as semantic risk managers on top of statistical discovery, prioritizing lead-lag relationships that generalize under changing market conditions.

2026-02-04T12:34:19Z 11 pages Sumin Kim Minjae Kim Jihoon Kwon Yoon Kim Nicole Kagan Joo Won Lee Oscar Levy Alejandro Lopez-Lira Yongjae Lee Chanyeol Choi http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04412v5 2026-02-26T08:55:00Z

The Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) calculation is computationally intensive, relying on the market-consistent estimation of own funds. While Solvency II prioritizes the direct valuation method, it theoretically yields the same value as the indirect method. This paper evaluates their practical performance within a risk-neutral pricing framework. First, we present a simplified proof that direct and indirect estimators converge to the same value. For $T$ being the number of time steps in the simulation, we then introduce a novel family of $2^T$ mixed estimators including both methods as edge cases, integrating them into a control variate framework for significant variance reduction. This framework is further extended to incorporate market frictions for real-world applicability. Evaluating these estimators on three life insurance asset-liability management models demonstrates that their performance is fundamentally driven by the degree of asset-liability coupling. While stronger coupling in realistic settings consistently favors the indirect method, neither baseline estimator is universally superior. Furthermore, this coupling directly impacts the success of our proposed control variates. They can dramatically reduce variance to one-tenth of the standard direct estimator, but their efficacy remains model-dependent. The source code is publicly available on https://gitlab.cc-asp.fraunhofer.de/itwm-fm-lv-public/wolf-estimation-of-own-funds.

2025-11-06T14:41:55Z 31 pages, 17 figures Mark-Oliver Wolf http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00895v2 2026-02-24T15:04:07Z

Cost-of-capital valuation is a well-established approach to the valuation of liabilities and is one of the cornerstones of current regulatory frameworks for the insurance industry. Standard cost-of-capital considerations typically rely on the assumption that the required buffer capital is held in risk-less one-year bonds. The aim of this work is to analyze the effects of allowing investments of the buffer capital in risky assets, e.g.~in a combination of stocks and bonds. In particular, we make precise how the decomposition of the buffer capital into contributions from policyholders and investors varies as the degree of riskiness of the investment increases, and highlight the role of limited liability in the case of heavy-tailed insurance risks. We present a combination of general theoretical results, explicit results for certain stochastic models and numerical results that emphasize the key findings.

2025-11-02T11:27:07Z Hansjörg Albrecher Filip Lindskog Hervé Zumbach http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06185v6 2026-02-24T03:33:43Z

Systemic risk measures are crucial for the stability of financial markets, yet classical formulations fail to capture the complexity of market volatility. We propose a new framework for systemic risk measurement on the variable-exponent Bochner-Lebesgue space $L^{p(\cdot)}$, where the exponent $p(\cdot)$ is a random variable rather than a deterministic constant parameter, thereby inherently encoding latent market volatility. By constructing suitable deterministic auxiliary functions and single-firm risk measures, we decompose the quantification of systemic risk in $L^{p(\cdot)}$ into two sequential steps, ultimately deriving its dual representations. Several examples are provided to illustrate the theoretical results.

2018-11-30T07:30:19Z arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1806.01166, arXiv:1806.08701 Fei Sun Jieming Zhou http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19663v1 2026-02-23T10:10:46Z

In this paper, we study how class imbalance, typical of low-default credit portfolios, affects the performance of logistic regression models. Using a simulation study with controlled data-generating mechanisms, we vary (i) the level of class imbalance and (ii) the strength of association between the predictors and the response. The results show that, for a given strength of association, achievable classification accuracy deteriorates markedly as the event rate decreases, and the optimal classification cut-off shifts with the level of imbalance. In contrast, the Gini coefficient is comparatively stable with respect to class imbalance once sample sizes are sufficiently large, even when classification accuracy is strongly affected. As a practical guideline, we summarise attainable classification performance as a function of the event rate and strength of association between the predictors and the response.

2026-02-23T10:10:46Z 24 pages, 9 figures Willem D. Schutte Charl Pretorius Neill Smit Leandra van der Merwe Robert Maxwell http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18895v1 2026-02-21T16:35:06Z

Post-hoc explainability is central to credit risk model governance, yet widely used tools such as coefficient-based attributions and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) often produce numerical outputs that are difficult to communicate to non-technical stakeholders. This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can serve as post-hoc explainability tools for credit risk predictions through in-context learning, focusing on two roles: translators and autonomous explainers. Using a personal lending dataset from LendingClub, we evaluate three commercial LLMs, including GPT-4-turbo, Claude Sonnet 4, and Gemini-2.0-Flash. Results provide strong evidence for the translator role. In contrast, autonomous explanations show low alignment with model-based attributions. Few-shot prompting improves feature overlap for logistic regression but does not consistently benefit XGBoost, suggesting that LLMs have limited capacity to recover non-linear, interaction-driven reasoning from prompt cues alone. Our findings position LLMs as effective narrative interfaces grounded in auditable model attributions, rather than as substitutes for post-hoc explainers in credit risk model governance. Practitioners should leverage LLMs to bridge the communication gap between complex model outputs and regulatory or business stakeholders, while preserving the rigor and traceability required by credit risk governance frameworks.

2026-02-21T16:35:06Z 21 pages, 1 figure Wenxi Geng Dingyuan Liu Liya Li Yiqing Wang