https://arxiv.org/api/uey86t+Zc7RjyktLsOEmagV9Zlc 2026-07-21T08:41:30Z 2984 45 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22162v2 2026-06-29T04:23:09Z

Sectoral default dependence is usually described by a static correlation matrix, a static copula, or a small number of common factors. Such representations, when specified separately at each observation horizon, do not by themselves explain why the effective dependence observed in monthly credit data differs from that observed after annual aggregation. This paper proposes a dynamic low-rank state-space model for monthly multi-sector default-count data and studies the dependence structure induced by temporal coarse-graining. The leading eigenvectors of the monthly sectoral default-rate correlation matrix are used as fixed loading directions for persistent AR(1) latent credit-state factors, and defaults are modeled through a binomial observation layer. Survival aggregation of monthly posterior probability paths induces horizon-dependent distributions of sectoral default-probability vectors, from which effective correlation matrices, eigenvalue spectra, and posterior-implied rank copulas are obtained. Applied to S\&P monthly sector-level default-count data from 1981--01 to 2021--09, a two-factor specification captures the dominant market-wide and sector-rotation modes, reproduces the annual amplification of the leading eigenvalues, and generates heterogeneous copula structures across sector pairs. In an annual forecast evaluation, the dynamic factor specifications reduce the under-dispersion of static binomial and beta-binomial baselines, improving interval coverage and CRPS for aggregate portfolio counts. In log-score-based forecast comparisons, the one-factor specification is highly competitive, whereas the two-factor specification improves sector-level calibration as measured by per-sector CRPS.

2026-06-20T17:55:00Z 36 pages, 11 figures Shintaro Mori Masato Hisakado http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29406v1 2026-06-28T14:01:42Z

Organizations increasingly use large language models and agentic AI systems to generate probabilistic assessments and candidate actions in high-consequence settings. This creates a managerial problem distinct from prediction: how should organizations allocate decision authority to AI-generated recommendations as evidence quality, uncertainty, and organizational objectives evolve over time? Existing AI governance frameworks emphasize transparency, documentation, oversight, and regulatory compliance, but provide limited quantitative guidance for dynamically allocating decision authority under uncertainty. To address this challenge, we formulate adaptive AI delegation as a Governance-Aware Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) in which Bayesian inference estimates the informational state and sequential optimization determines delegated AI authority. The paper also develops a quantitative validation and benchmarking framework for governance policies. Synthetic stress tests, reported LLM-confidence robustness, forecast-accuracy validation, governance-appetite sensitivity, and fragile-AI early-warning experiments evaluate whether the proposed policy exhibits graceful degradation, robustness to confidence-only perturbations, adaptive delegation under improving evidence quality, and interpretable calibration of institutional conservatism. The Governance-Aware POMDP is further benchmarked against five representative governance strategies operating under identical Bayesian beliefs, information, and governance objectives. The results show that while specialized heuristics perform well in stationary settings, sequential Bayesian governance provides the strongest general-purpose governance policy across heterogeneous AI-quality regimes by adaptively allocating organizational decision authority under uncertainty.

2026-06-28T14:01:42Z 48 manuscript pages, 17 figures, and 10 tables Matthew Francis Dixon http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29018v1 2026-06-27T17:35:21Z

We show that net demand for liquidity by algo strategies is identifiable from its trade and price history alone, with no knowledge of its signal or optimization problem. An exact multi-period regret decomposition implies that the sign of this statistic classifies a linear strategy as a net liquidity consumer or provider, recovering the Kyle (1985) informed-trader/market-maker dichotomy from observables alone. Under an AR(1) cost process, the same statistic equals the product of strategy size and the squared Roll (1984) implied spread, making the correction a direct proxy for prevailing illiquidity. Extending to endogenous price impact and aggregating across N correlated strategies yields a liquidity-balance condition whose violation produces welfare loss scaling as N squared, a closed-form fire-sale externality. We calibrate to CRSP equity data (2016-2025), tracking implied spreads through the COVID-19 and 2022 rate-shock episodes, with an estimator computable in O(Tnd) time.

2026-06-27T17:35:21Z 26 pages Irene Aldridge http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28706v1 2026-06-27T03:18:06Z

Modern resolution and prudential regimes increasingly wind up a distressed firm not at a single hard threshold but through a graduated, state-dependent process. We study how the design of such a regime shapes the trade-off between shareholder value and financial stability for a firm whose surplus follows a general diffusion. Forced liquidation is modelled in reduced form, arriving at a surplus-dependent hazard rate that rises as the firm's position deteriorates. The framework has three regions: an unregulated region where dividends may be paid, a regulated region where solvency requirements prohibit distributions, and a distress region in which the firm faces the liquidation hazard. To quantify shareholder value we solve the resulting singular stochastic control problem: which is to maximise the expected present value of distributions until liquidation. We establish a verification theorem, prove that a barrier strategy is optimal, and obtain tractable expressions for the value function and the expected survival time, so that alternative designs can be compared at low cost. We show that a distress region placed solely below or solely above the classical ruin threshold does not consistently improve both shareholder value and firm survival, whereas combining the two yields a Pareto improvement. Regulatory design is decisive.

2026-06-27T03:18:06Z Benjamin Avanzi Bernard Wong Jinxia Zhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11578v2 2026-06-26T19:03:40Z

We describe challenges and opportunities related to risk assessment and mitigation for loss of earning capacity insurance with a special focus on Denmark. The presence of public benefits, claim settlement processes, and prevention initiatives introduces significant intricacy to the risk landscape. Accommodating this requires the development of innovative approaches from researchers and practitioners alike. Actuaries are uniquely positioned to lead the way, leveraging their domain knowledge and mathematical-statistical expertise to develop equitable, data-driven solutions that mitigate risk and enhance societal well-being.

2025-01-20T16:33:37Z C. Furrer O. L. Sandqvist http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27804v1 2026-06-26T07:44:40Z

The consideration of uncertainty is a central but frequently inadequately addressed component of risk management. A systematic treatment of uncertainty is essential for ensuring the quality and traceability of decision-making processes, particularly in complex and safety-critical environments. This review systematically analyzes how established risk management approaches conceptualize and represent uncertainty in both their theoretical foundations and practical applications. Based on a systematic literature review of 370 publications, the identified approaches are classified into five methodological families. These include probabilistic methods, evidence-based and fuzzy-logic approaches, qualitative elicitation techniques, graphical and visual representations and hybrid frameworks. The analysis shows that probabilistic methods remain predominant due to their quantitative rigor, whereas fuzzy and evidence-based approaches are particularly suited to addressing vagueness and epistemic uncertainty. Qualitative and graphical approaches are found to enhance interpretive understanding and support the transparent communication of uncertainty. Despite these developments, the analysis indicates that the practical integration of these approaches into operational risk management remains limited in many domains. The findings highlight the need for more structured guidance in method selection and suggest that future research would benefit from further development of hybrid approaches and visualization techniques.

2026-06-26T07:44:40Z Albert Kutej Stefan Rass http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26731v2 2026-06-26T06:09:14Z

This paper develops a robust hedging valuation adjustment (HVA) measure for dynamic hedging. Simulated rebalancing and maturity-unwind trades generate a loss distribution for each no-trade-band rule, and we define robust HVA as the worst-case expected loss over a relative-entropy neighborhood of that distribution. Because band width affects turnover, the same relative-entropy radius applied to different bands can imply different levels of demand-liquidity stress. We distinguish a fixed-radius convention from a fixed benchmark-stress convention and show that wider no-trade bands lower rebalancing costs but raise hedge-error risk.

2026-06-25T08:16:25Z Takayuki Sakuma http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27150v1 2026-06-25T15:19:09Z

We study endogenous reinsurance pricing in a competitive insurance market with one strategic reinsurer and many heterogeneous insurers. The reinsurer acts as a Stackelberg leader by choosing a common premium rate and an investment strategy, while insurers decide how much risk to retain and how to invest, taking into account their own performance, their performance relative to the insurer population, and common insurance-claim and financial-market noise. This creates a feedback loop absent from standard reinsurance models with exogenous premiums: a premium change affects insurers directly through the cost of reinsurance, and indirectly through the population's aggregate exposure to common insurance-claim risk. For a fixed premium, we characterize the insurers' equilibrium retention through a scalar fixed point and establish its monotone premium response. This characterization reveals a spillover mechanism generated by relative performance concerns and leads to a threshold structure in which insurers move from full cession to partial retention and then to full retention as the premium increases. Using this structure, we reduce the reinsurer's premium problem to a one-dimensional optimization over a compact premium interval and characterize Stackelberg equilibria in both finite-player and mean field models. In the finite-player case, we develop an efficient threshold continuation procedure that determines equilibrium premiums without enumerating all retention configurations. We also prove convergence from finite-player equilibria to mean field equilibria without requiring the mean field equilibrium premium to be unique. Numerical illustrations show how relative performance concerns amplify spillover effects and can induce retention even when reinsurance remains actuarially favorable. They also demonstrate that Stackelberg equilibria need not be unique in either setting.

2026-06-25T15:19:09Z 45 pages, 6 figures Ruimeng Hu Byungdoo Kong http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26625v1 2026-06-25T05:40:06Z

This paper examines portfolio optimization for commodity exchange-traded funds (ETFs) under heavy-tailed return behavior. Using daily Bloomberg data for 30 U.S.-listed commodity ETFs from 12 December 2018 to 16 December 2024, we study funds spanning agriculture, energy, metals, and broad commodity index exposure. We compare a passive buy-and-hold portfolio with rolling-window optimized portfolios formed under mean--variance and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) criteria, considering both long-only and restricted long--short strategies. The results showed substantial heterogeneity across commodity sectors, with energy and broad commodity index funds displaying pronounced volatility, skewness, and excess kurtosis. Historical optimization indicated that minimum-risk and CVaR-based portfolios provided more stable cumulative performance than tangent portfolios and generally improved Sharpe, Calmar, and STARR$_{0.95}$ ratios. Extreme-value diagnostics showed that optimized portfolios remained exposed to heavy downside tails, so improved risk-adjusted performance did not eliminate extreme-loss risk. A dynamic extension based on ARMA--GARCH marginal models, Student--$t$ copula dependence, and one-step-ahead predictive scenarios improved performance mainly when combined with minimum-risk or CVaR-based objectives. Dynamic mean--variance tangent portfolios performed less reliably, reflecting sensitivity to expected-return estimation error. Transaction-cost robustness checks further showed that the practical value of dynamic optimization depended on turnover control, with low-turnover dynamic CVaR tangent portfolios remaining more resilient to implementation costs. Overall, the analysis showed that commodity ETF allocation benefited most from conservative and downside-risk-aware optimization, while optimized portfolios continued to require explicit tail-risk and implementation diagnostics.

2026-06-25T05:40:06Z Nicholas Appiah Ali Jaffri Dilmi C. W. Hettiachchi-Halpe-Kankanamalage Svetlozar T. Rachev http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07431v3 2026-06-24T21:53:06Z

Design and implementation of appropriate social protection strategies is one of the main targets of the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 1: No Poverty. Cash transfer (CT) programmes are considered one of the main social protection strategies and an instrument for achieving SDG 1. Targeting consists of establishing eligibility criteria for beneficiaries of CT programmes. In low-income countries, where resources are limited, proper targeting of CTs is essential for an efficient use of resources. Given the growing importance of microinsurance as a complementary tool to social protection strategies, this study examines its role as a supplement to CT programmes. In this article, we adopt the piecewise-deterministic Markov process introduced in Kovacevic and Pflug (2011) to model the capital of a household, which when exposed to proportional capital losses (in contrast to the classical Cramér-Lundberg model) can push them into the poverty area. Striving for cost-effective CT programmes, we optimise the expected discounted cost of keeping the household's capital above the poverty line by means of injection of capital (as a direct capital transfer). Using dynamic programming techniques, we derive the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation associated with the optimal control problem of determining the amount of capital to inject over time. We show that this equation admits a viscosity solution that can be approximated numerically. Moreover, in certain special cases, we obtain closed-form expressions for the solution. Numerical examples show that there is an optimal level of injection above the poverty threshold, suggesting that efficient use of resources is achieved when CTs are preventive rather than reactive, since injecting capital into households when their capital levels are above the poverty line is less costly than to do so only when it falls below the threshold.

2025-10-30T09:26:39Z 50 pages, 8 figures Pablo Azcue Corina Constantinescu José Miguel Flores-Contró Nora Muler http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18942v3 2026-06-24T18:27:54Z

This article explores the potential of generative AI (GenAI) to support actuarial practice through four implemented case studies. It situates these case studies within the broader evolution of artificial intelligence in actuarial science, from early neural networks and machine learning to modern transformer-based GenAI systems. The first case study illustrates how large language models (LLMs) can improve claim cost prediction by extracting informative features from unstructured text for use in the underlying supervised learning task. The second case study demonstrates the automation of market comparisons using Retrieval-Augmented Generation to identify, extract, and structure relevant information from insurers' annual reports. The third case study highlights the capabilities of fine-tuned vision-enabled LLMs in classifying car damage types and extracting contextual information from images. The fourth case study presents a multi-agent system that autonomously migrates actuarial legacy code from R to Python and validates the translation against the original code's outputs. In addition to these case studies, we outline further GenAI applications in the insurance industry. Finally, we discuss the regulatory, security, dual-use and fraud, reproducibility, privacy, governance, and organisational challenges associated with deploying GenAI in regulated insurance environments.

2025-06-22T19:36:03Z v3: Minor revision in response to peer review. Methodological and reproducibility refinements across the case studies and the governance section Simon Hatzesberger Iris Nonneman http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26031v1 2026-06-24T17:03:06Z

Monetary risk measures quantify the risk of uncertain monetary payoffs (or losses), whereas in time series analysis risk is typically assessed using logarithmic returns. Return risk measures (RRMs) provide an axiomatic foundation for this latter approach, which relies crucially on the positive cone of the space of essentially bounded random variables. We extend RRMs to general ordered vector spaces and characterize positive homogeneity via the geometric epigraph. To investigate geometric convexity and establish connections with monetary risk measures, we specialize the domain to AM-algebras, encompassing Euclidean spaces and spaces of multidimensional essentially bounded random variables. The latter is novel in the context of RRMs and leads to the new classes of systemic and vector-valued RRMs. We establish results on finiteness, continuity, separability, as well as dual and aggregation-based representations.

2026-06-24T17:03:06Z Christian Laudagé http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19511v4 2026-06-23T09:40:34Z

This paper studies the mathematical problem of allocating payouts (compensations) in an endowment contingency fund using a risk-sharing rule that satisfies full allocation. Besides the participants, an administrator manages the fund by collecting ex-ante contributions to establish the fund and distributing ex-post payouts to members. Two types of administrators are considered. An 'active' administrator both invests in the fund and receives the payout of the fund when no participant receives a payout. A 'passive' administrator performs only administrative tasks and neither invests in nor receives a payout from the fund. We analyze the actuarial fairness of both compensation-based risk-sharing schemes and provide general conditions under which fairness is achieved. The results extend earlier work by Denuit and Robert (2025) and Dhaene and Milevsky (2024), who focused on payouts based on Bernoulli distributions, by allowing for general non-negative loss distributions.

2025-10-22T12:05:05Z Jan Dhaene Atibhav Chaudhry Ka Chun Cheung Austin Riis-Due http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23492v1 2026-06-22T15:39:33Z

Synthetic generators of daily equity returns let practitioners stress test, backtest, and design scenarios that a single realized market history cannot supply, but only if the generator reproduces the stylized facts of real returns: heavy tails, negligible linear autocorrelation, and slow decay of the absolute-return autocorrelation. Hidden Markov models with few Gaussian states were long thought unable to reproduce that slow decay, and the standard fix was to abandon them for more complex hidden semi-Markov models. We revisit this issue with a continuous hidden Markov model whose regime chain governs the autocorrelation while per-regime densities govern the marginal, separating the temporal and distributional sides of the original failure. A unified expectation-maximization framework fits Gaussian, Student-t, Laplace, and generalized-error emissions under shared forward-backward recursions and quantile-based initialization, and a spectral identity bounds the number of decay modes by the rank of the centred transition matrix. Across SPY walk-forward folds, a sector-balanced 30-ticker panel, a CRSP cross-decade transfer, and a six-asset basket, that bound was not binding once a few states were used: heavy-tailed marginals, not additional decay modes, closed most of the fit gap, recovering volatility clustering above the i.i.d. baseline and narrowing the kurtosis gap without a tuning hyperparameter. The original failure is therefore distributional, not temporal. On daily US equities, a simple, interpretable Markov model suffices, and unlike a bootstrap or semi-Markov fit that wins only on a single-window fit, the fitted model also yields a regime-conditional Value-at-Risk that passes a joint conditional-coverage test and a copula that reproduces cross-asset correlations: one interpretable generator serving both path simulation and downstream risk and portfolio tasks.

2026-06-22T15:39:33Z Abdulrahman Alswaidan Cade Jin Jeffrey D. Varner http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22956v1 2026-06-22T07:34:55Z

This paper studies centralized risk sharing with endogenous prices. Multiple policyholders transfer risks to a central insurer through indemnity decisions, while prices are determined by pricing functionals applied to ceded risks. The resulting problem is multiobjective, with Pareto optimality as the natural efficiency criterion. We show that classical Pareto optimality may fail to reveal whether all agents are represented in a balanced decision process that scalarized objectives may assign zero weight to some agents, and group aggregates may obscure individual risk positions. Motivated by bilateral Pareto characterizations through sequential optimization, we introduce inclusive and fair Pareto optimality, a representation-based refinement requiring every agent to appear exactly once, either individually or as part of a group, in a finite ordered sequence of optimizations. Our main result proves equivalence between this concept and balanced sequential optimization, placing it between Geoffrion-proper Pareto optimality and classical Pareto optimality. An illustrative example demonstrates the framework using the Expected Shortfall.

2026-06-22T07:34:55Z Debora Daniela Escobar Wing Fung Chong