https://arxiv.org/api/O8eVw2WJftumg2w8FaJOVvZdrgs 2026-07-20T22:53:12Z 2980 30 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.01730v3 2026-07-02T07:00:47Z

We investigate the asymptotic behavior of the risk premium associated with a linear risk sharing contract in an infinitely expanding risk pool. We consider general preferences represented by law-invariant robust utility functionals. These preferences encompass the rank-dependent utility model as a special case. We also examine Pareto optimality of general and, in particular, linear risk sharing rules with these preferences. Our analysis is not limited to the classical i.i.d. setting, but allows for heterogeneous risks. Two case studies on actuarial pricing for independent but heterogeneous risks illustrate our results.

2021-07-04T20:59:05Z Thomas Knispel Roger J. A. Laeven Gregor Svindland http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10402v4 2026-07-02T06:30:15Z

Volatility forecasting becomes challenging when market conditions shift and model performance varies across market states. Motivated by this instability, we develop a risk-sensitive specialist routing framework for ETF volatility forecasting. The framework uses online risk-sensitive evaluation and state-dependent gating to combine different forecasting specialists across calm and stressed market states. Using a daily panel of six ETFs under a rolling walk-forward design, we find that the strongest forecaster is regime-dependent rather than stable across all states. Relative to the rolling-best baseline, the proposed routing framework reduces high-volatility forecast loss by about 24% and underprediction loss by about 22%. These results suggest that specialist routing provides a practical forecasting architecture that adapts to changing market conditions.

2026-04-12T01:24:02Z 6 pages. Accepted as a regular paper at IEEE SMC 2026 Tenghan Zhong http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08765v3 2026-07-02T06:28:39Z

Daily ETF risk monitoring can become unreliable when market data quality degrades, market conditions shift, or predictive performance becomes unstable. This paper develops a reliability-aware risk monitoring service for next-day tail-risk surveillance. The proposed framework combines service-time quality checks, lower-tail prediction, uncertainty scoring, and risk-aware adjustment of the tail-risk estimate. We evaluate the system on a daily panel of multiple ETFs augmented with VIX and yield-curve information under a rolling walk-forward design. Empirically, the framework improves tail-risk monitoring, especially during stressed periods, while remaining reliable under simulated input degradation.

2026-04-09T21:05:24Z 6 pages. Accepted as a regular paper at IEEE SMC 2026 Tenghan Zhong Keyuan Wu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31122v1 2026-06-30T04:35:20Z

Financial stress tests based on handpicked scenarios can mislead risk management by overlooking genuinely dangerous configurations or overemphasising shocks that are too implausible to be decision-relevant. We develop a systematic method for generating plausible stress scenarios for financial losses driven by exogenous risk factors. The method exploits a large-deviations principle: conditional on a large loss, the risk factors concentrate near the most likely stress configurations. We use this structure to define representative stress distributions and to extrapolate observed samples into more extreme scenarios while preserving the relative plausibility of stress mechanisms. As a result, the procedure can generate informative stress scenarios even when historical data contain few or no observations in the stressed regime. Numerical experiments on two financial network models show that the method recovers the stressed loss law and key stress diagnostics, including in settings where benchmark generators fail to generate any stressed samples.

2026-06-30T04:35:20Z Anand Deo http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21539v2 2026-06-29T23:31:50Z

Complex model suites composed of multiple interacting component models are widely used in financial forecasting and risk management. In model performance testing, including in-sample backtesting (BT) and out-of-sample ongoing performance monitoring (OPM), a material gap between a model-suite forecast and the realized outcome must often be attributed to individual component models for development, validation, and regulatory review. This paper studies this gap-attribution problem in the expected loss framework, where exposure at default (EAD), prepayment or single monthly mortality (SMM), probability of default (PD), and loss given default (LGD) interact multiplicatively and are aggregated across loans and projection periods. We first formalize standard walk analysis and show why its attribution is generally order dependent. We then adapt two order-independent attribution frameworks: an augmented Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) approach tailored to the expected-loss structure, and a more general Shapley value approach based on averaging marginal contributions over all component orderings. We derive both elementwise and vectorized formulas to support efficient implementation, with the additional computation time for gap attribution typically limited to a few seconds in practical portfolio-scale examples. Finally, we discuss the connections among walk analysis, LMDI, and Shapley attribution, and show how the attribution framework extends to model suites with an additional Monte Carlo simulation layer.

2026-06-19T15:38:21Z Xuan Mei Junze Lin http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19501v2 2026-06-29T18:36:47Z

Decentralized finance exposes supervisors to fast-moving, networked credit risks. General-purpose LLM agents fit this setting poorly: they over-read weak evidence and recommend high-stakes interventions, while existing evaluations offer no regulator-aligned way to measure the resulting false alarms. We introduce DeXposure-Claw, a forecast-grounded agentic supervision system that routes LLM decisions through structured evidence: (1) DeXposure-FM, a graph time-series foundation model, forecasts future exposure networks; (2) deterministic monitors and stress scenarios then turn those forecasts into typed alerts, attribution signals, and scenario evidence; and (3) data-health and confidence gates constrain escalation before DeXposure-Claw emits auditable supervisory tickets with rationales. We further develop DeXposure-Bench, a six-axis evaluation harness, whose decision axis scores tickets against a regulator-aligned absolute-loss ground truth and an explicit false-intervention rate. Experiments on five years of weekly real data fully support our system. Code is at https://github.com/EVIEHub/DeXposure-Claw.

2026-06-17T18:40:08Z Aijie Shu Bowei Chen Wenbin Wu Cathy Yi-Hsuan Chen Fengxiang He http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30779v1 2026-06-29T18:08:15Z

This paper proves a sum-minimization characterization of Pareto efficient insurance with multiple policyholders, multiple insurers, and multiple indemnity environments. We also provide a result regarding the pairwise implementability of the policyholder- and insurer-aggregate level arrangements in the multiple policyholders and multiple insurers setting.

2026-06-29T18:08:15Z Zijun Meng http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30193v1 2026-06-29T12:11:14Z

We study risk aggregation problems for arbitrary non-decreasing aggregation functions and tail risk measures under dependence uncertainty in a distributionally robust setting. To this end, we introduce the notion of hidden dependence for random vectors, which is built on the concepts of risk concentration and common tail events developed in Wang and Zitikis (2020). We show that, starting from a tail event $A$ of the aggregate loss for an arbitrary random vector $Y$, one can construct a random vector with hidden dependence that dominates $Y$ on the tail event $A$. We then focus on the case in which model uncertainty is described by small perturbations of the distribution of a random vector with respect to a suitable probability distance without changing the marginals. We show that these perturbations of the reference distribution are compatible with hidden dependence and thus lead to the same worst-case risk bounds as in the unconstrained case for arbitrary $γ$-tail risk measures with a suitable level $γ$. Finally, we apply our results in a credit risk context and quantify the potential underestimation of portfolio risk arising from uncertainty in the dependence structure. In particular, we show that even small deviations from a reference Gaussian dependence model can, in principle, justify dramatic increases in capital requirements.

2026-06-29T12:11:14Z Corrado De Vecchi Max Nendel Steven Vanduffel http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30037v1 2026-06-29T09:35:21Z

In a deep forecasting pipeline for fat-tailed financial returns at short horizons, which matters more - the backbone architecture or the output head? We compare four modern backbones (TimesNet, DLinear, N-BEATS, iTransformer) under three output heads: a point head, a single-Gaussian density head, and a Gaussian mixture density head with K=4 components. On S and P 500 monthly log-returns (1871-2023) under anchored walk-forward validation, the three heads form a strict gradient: switching from point to Gaussian improves CRPS by about 1.3 percent; switching from Gaussian to mixture adds a further about 2.4 percent. Switching between backbones, in contrast, changes CRPS by less than 1.5 percent on the point-head row and on the backbone-mean axis; density-head backbone spread is larger (up to 5.1 percent on the h=1 Gaussian row, driven by N-BEATS) but the head gradient (3.7 percentage points) still dominates. The Model Confidence Set on squared errors does not exclude any of the 12 variants at the 5 percent level: the head separates them only on distributional metrics (CRPS, pinball, coverage), not on squared error. The mixture head incremental value over a single Gaussian is largest in the highest-volatility regimes (13.9 percent in 1970s stagflation at h=12), confirming the mixture captures tail risk beyond what a unimodal Gaussian can express. The picture is horizon-dependent: the head dominates at short horizons, but at long horizons (h >= 6) the backbone re-takes the lead - an h-split we document against classical baselines (section 5.1). We conclude that on fat-tailed returns at short horizons, the head dominates the backbone, and the mixture distribution adds genuine value over a single Gaussian during crisis periods when risk-management decisions actually matter.

2026-06-29T09:35:21Z Code & data: https://github.com/Routhleck/heads-not-backbones Sichao He Yansong Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16438v2 2026-06-29T08:57:54Z

This paper develops an axiomatic framework for ranking metrics, a general class of functionals for evaluating and ordering financial or insurance positions. Unlike traditional risk-adjusted performance measures-such as the Sharpe ratio, RAROC, or Omega-that express reward per unit of risk, ranking metrics assign each position a performance level rather than a normalized return. Relying on monotonicity and a new property called cash-quasiconcavity, we derive representation results linking ranking metrics to families of acceptance sets and risk measures, extending the theory of acceptability indices. Classical ratios arise as special cases, while new examples-based on expected-loss, Lambda-quantile, and bibliometric indices-illustrate the framework's flexibility. Empirical applications to portfolio ranking and climate-risk insurance demonstrate its practical relevance.

2026-04-06T23:07:55Z Asmerilda Hitaj Elisa Mastrogiacomo Ilaria Peri Marcelo Righi http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22162v2 2026-06-29T04:23:09Z

Sectoral default dependence is usually described by a static correlation matrix, a static copula, or a small number of common factors. Such representations, when specified separately at each observation horizon, do not by themselves explain why the effective dependence observed in monthly credit data differs from that observed after annual aggregation. This paper proposes a dynamic low-rank state-space model for monthly multi-sector default-count data and studies the dependence structure induced by temporal coarse-graining. The leading eigenvectors of the monthly sectoral default-rate correlation matrix are used as fixed loading directions for persistent AR(1) latent credit-state factors, and defaults are modeled through a binomial observation layer. Survival aggregation of monthly posterior probability paths induces horizon-dependent distributions of sectoral default-probability vectors, from which effective correlation matrices, eigenvalue spectra, and posterior-implied rank copulas are obtained. Applied to S\&P monthly sector-level default-count data from 1981--01 to 2021--09, a two-factor specification captures the dominant market-wide and sector-rotation modes, reproduces the annual amplification of the leading eigenvalues, and generates heterogeneous copula structures across sector pairs. In an annual forecast evaluation, the dynamic factor specifications reduce the under-dispersion of static binomial and beta-binomial baselines, improving interval coverage and CRPS for aggregate portfolio counts. In log-score-based forecast comparisons, the one-factor specification is highly competitive, whereas the two-factor specification improves sector-level calibration as measured by per-sector CRPS.

2026-06-20T17:55:00Z 36 pages, 11 figures Shintaro Mori Masato Hisakado http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29406v1 2026-06-28T14:01:42Z

Organizations increasingly use large language models and agentic AI systems to generate probabilistic assessments and candidate actions in high-consequence settings. This creates a managerial problem distinct from prediction: how should organizations allocate decision authority to AI-generated recommendations as evidence quality, uncertainty, and organizational objectives evolve over time? Existing AI governance frameworks emphasize transparency, documentation, oversight, and regulatory compliance, but provide limited quantitative guidance for dynamically allocating decision authority under uncertainty. To address this challenge, we formulate adaptive AI delegation as a Governance-Aware Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) in which Bayesian inference estimates the informational state and sequential optimization determines delegated AI authority. The paper also develops a quantitative validation and benchmarking framework for governance policies. Synthetic stress tests, reported LLM-confidence robustness, forecast-accuracy validation, governance-appetite sensitivity, and fragile-AI early-warning experiments evaluate whether the proposed policy exhibits graceful degradation, robustness to confidence-only perturbations, adaptive delegation under improving evidence quality, and interpretable calibration of institutional conservatism. The Governance-Aware POMDP is further benchmarked against five representative governance strategies operating under identical Bayesian beliefs, information, and governance objectives. The results show that while specialized heuristics perform well in stationary settings, sequential Bayesian governance provides the strongest general-purpose governance policy across heterogeneous AI-quality regimes by adaptively allocating organizational decision authority under uncertainty.

2026-06-28T14:01:42Z 48 manuscript pages, 17 figures, and 10 tables Matthew Francis Dixon http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29018v1 2026-06-27T17:35:21Z

We show that net demand for liquidity by algo strategies is identifiable from its trade and price history alone, with no knowledge of its signal or optimization problem. An exact multi-period regret decomposition implies that the sign of this statistic classifies a linear strategy as a net liquidity consumer or provider, recovering the Kyle (1985) informed-trader/market-maker dichotomy from observables alone. Under an AR(1) cost process, the same statistic equals the product of strategy size and the squared Roll (1984) implied spread, making the correction a direct proxy for prevailing illiquidity. Extending to endogenous price impact and aggregating across N correlated strategies yields a liquidity-balance condition whose violation produces welfare loss scaling as N squared, a closed-form fire-sale externality. We calibrate to CRSP equity data (2016-2025), tracking implied spreads through the COVID-19 and 2022 rate-shock episodes, with an estimator computable in O(Tnd) time.

2026-06-27T17:35:21Z 26 pages Irene Aldridge http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28706v1 2026-06-27T03:18:06Z

Modern resolution and prudential regimes increasingly wind up a distressed firm not at a single hard threshold but through a graduated, state-dependent process. We study how the design of such a regime shapes the trade-off between shareholder value and financial stability for a firm whose surplus follows a general diffusion. Forced liquidation is modelled in reduced form, arriving at a surplus-dependent hazard rate that rises as the firm's position deteriorates. The framework has three regions: an unregulated region where dividends may be paid, a regulated region where solvency requirements prohibit distributions, and a distress region in which the firm faces the liquidation hazard. To quantify shareholder value we solve the resulting singular stochastic control problem: which is to maximise the expected present value of distributions until liquidation. We establish a verification theorem, prove that a barrier strategy is optimal, and obtain tractable expressions for the value function and the expected survival time, so that alternative designs can be compared at low cost. We show that a distress region placed solely below or solely above the classical ruin threshold does not consistently improve both shareholder value and firm survival, whereas combining the two yields a Pareto improvement. Regulatory design is decisive.

2026-06-27T03:18:06Z Benjamin Avanzi Bernard Wong Jinxia Zhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11578v2 2026-06-26T19:03:40Z

We describe challenges and opportunities related to risk assessment and mitigation for loss of earning capacity insurance with a special focus on Denmark. The presence of public benefits, claim settlement processes, and prevention initiatives introduces significant intricacy to the risk landscape. Accommodating this requires the development of innovative approaches from researchers and practitioners alike. Actuaries are uniquely positioned to lead the way, leveraging their domain knowledge and mathematical-statistical expertise to develop equitable, data-driven solutions that mitigate risk and enhance societal well-being.

2025-01-20T16:33:37Z C. Furrer O. L. Sandqvist