https://arxiv.org/api/O8eVw2WJftumg2w8FaJOVvZdrgs 2026-03-20T12:30:52Z 2819 30 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09854v1 2026-03-10T16:15:17Z

Assessing the resilience of the economy requires accounting for its intrinsic multi-layer nature, by assessing for instance how disruptions at the firm level spread through the production network and propagate to the banking sector. Methods exist to measure the reverberation of shocks over the multilayer network of supply-customer relations among firms, corporate loans of banks and their interbank market exposures. However, empirical network data are often privacy protected and thus inaccessible to researchers and regulators. In this work we develop an unified framework, combining state-of-the art techniques to reconstruct the whole multilayer structure of the economy from balance sheet information of banks and firms, as well as dynamics of shock propagation from the inter-firm to the interbank layers. We showcase application of our methodology using data of the Italian economy. We identify the most systemically important firms and industries, as well as the most vulnerable banks, further assessing the determinants of systemic risk -- obtaining results coherent with the empirical literature on network contagion. Overall, our framework allows performing detailed network-based stress tests on a digital twin of the economy, without requiring detailed network information that is difficult to acquire.

2026-03-10T16:15:17Z Soumen Majhi Anna Mancini Giulio Cimini http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16265v3 2026-03-10T15:53:49Z

Diversification is usually viewed as a reliable way to reduce risk, yet it can dramatically fail for heavy-tailed losses with infinite mean: pooling independent losses of this type may increase tail risk at every threshold. We study this reversal by comparing a diversified portfolio (a weighted average) of risks to a "one-basket" benchmark that concentrates the full exposure on a single component chosen at random according to the same weights. In the iid case, the benchmark reduces to a single risk, recovering the classical comparison between a single risk and a diversified portfolio. Our main result -- the one-basket theorem -- provides new sufficient conditions under which the diversified portfolio has larger tail probabilities for all thresholds (first-order stochastic dominance) than this benchmark. The theorem enables weight-specific verification of the stochastic dominance relation and yields new applications, notably to averages of infinite-mean discrete Pareto risks. We further show that these failures of diversification are boundary cases of a general phenomenon: diversification always increases the likelihood of exceeding thresholds near zero, and under specific conditions this local effect extends to all thresholds, yielding first-order stochastic dominance.

2025-07-22T06:23:19Z Léonard Vincent http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01221v2 2026-03-10T14:16:40Z

We develop a continuous-time stochastic model for optimal cybersecurity investment under the threat of cyberattacks. The arrival of attacks is modeled using a Hawkes process, capturing the empirically relevant feature of clustering in cyberattacks. Extending the Gordon-Loeb model, each attack may result in a breach, with breach probability depending on the system's vulnerability. We aim at determining the optimal cybersecurity investment to reduce vulnerability. The problem is cast as a two-dimensional Markovian stochastic optimal control problem and solved using dynamic programming methods. Numerical results illustrate how accounting for attack clustering leads to more responsive and effective investment policies, offering significant improvements over static and Poisson-based benchmark strategies. Our findings underscore the value of incorporating realistic threat dynamics into cybersecurity risk management.

2025-05-02T12:15:44Z 18 pages, 10 figures (revised version, included Section 6 on implications for cyber-insurance) Giorgia Callegaro Claudio Fontana Caroline Hillairet Beatrice Ongarato http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09164v1 2026-03-10T04:01:37Z

We introduce $\textbf{Slippage-at-Risk (SaR)}$, a quantitative framework for measuring liquidity risk in perpetual futures exchanges. Unlike backward-looking metrics such as Value-at-Risk computed on historical returns or realized deficit distributions, SaR provides a \emph{forward-looking} assessment of liquidation execution risk derived from current order book microstructure. The framework comprises three complementary metrics: $SaR(α)$, the cross-sectional slippage quantile; $ESaR(α)$, the expected slippage in the distributional tail; and $TSaR(α)$, the aggregate dollar-denominated tail slippage. We extend the base framework with a \emph{concentration adjustment} that penalizes fragile liquidity structures where a small number of market makers dominate quote provision. Drawing on recent work by Chitra et al. (2025) on autodeleveraging mechanisms and insurance fund optimization, we establish a direct mapping from SaR metrics to optimal capital requirements. Empirical analysis using Hyperliquid order book data, including the October 10, 2025 liquidation cascade, demonstrates SaR's predictive validity as a leading indicator of systemic stress. We conclude with practical implementation guidance and discuss philosophical implications for risk management in decentralized financial systems.

2026-03-10T04:01:37Z 32 pages, 8 fugures Otar Sepper http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00655v2 2026-03-10T01:19:37Z

We study risk sharing among agents with preferences modeled by heterogeneous distortion risk measures, who are not necessarily risk averse. Pareto optimality for agents using risk measures is often studied through the lens of inf-convolutions, because allocations that attain the inf-convolution are Pareto optimal, and the converse holds true under translation invariance. Our main focus is on groups of agents who exhibit varying levels of risk seeking. Under mild assumptions, we derive explicit solutions for the unconstrained inf-convolution and the counter-monotonic inf-convolution, which can be represented by a generalization of distortion risk measures.

2024-12-01T03:18:32Z 31 pages Mario Ghossoub Qinghua Ren Ruodu Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08553v1 2026-03-09T16:16:59Z

We propose Generative Adversarial Regression (GAR), a framework for learning conditional risk scenarios through generators aligned with downstream risk objectives. GAR builds on a regression characterization of conditional risk for elicitable functionals, including quantiles, expectiles, and jointly elicitable pairs. We extend this principle from point prediction to generative modeling by training generators whose policy-induced risk matches that of real data under the same context. To ensure robustness across all policies, GAR adopts a minimax formulation in which an adversarial policy identifies worst-case discrepancies in risk evaluation while the generator adapts to eliminate them. This structure preserves alignment with the risk functional across a broad class of policies rather than a fixed, pre-specified set. We illustrate GAR through a tail-risk instantiation based on jointly elicitable $(\mathrm{VaR}, \mathrm{ES})$ objectives. Experiments on S\&P 500 data show that GAR produces scenarios that better preserve downstream risk than unconditional, econometric, and direct predictive baselines while remaining stable under adversarially selected policies.

2026-03-09T16:16:59Z Saeed Asadi Jonathan Yu-Meng Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07752v1 2026-03-08T18:00:03Z

We study an OTC FX market-making problem, built on the Avellaneda-Stoikov tradition, in which a dealer streams size-dependent quotes on a discrete ladder and manages inventory risk over a finite horizon under Poisson arrivals of trade requests. Adverse selection is modelled through latency-driven price moves over a delay window, represented by Gaussian marks whose conditional means can depend on the quoted spread, capturing selective client reaction to stale quotes. The dealer can address latency risk through trade rejection when slippage breaches a tolerance threshold. We treat slippage tolerance as an explicit control jointly optimized with quotes: upon receiving a trade request, the dealer chooses an acceptance/rejection rule, which makes the trade economically akin to an embedded option written on the latency price move. We further introduce rejection feedback through an EMA-based rejection score used as a reputation proxy, so that client intensity is endogenously modulated by past rejections via a multiplicative factor. Using dynamic programming, we derive a Markov control problem with state variables (inventory, rejection-score) and show how rejection decision enters the HJB equation through Hamiltonians that include an expectation over the latency mark and a maximization over both quote and rejection rule parameters. For practical control evaluation, we develop an adiabatic-quadratic approximation: fixing reputation on the inventory-control time scale, expanding Hamiltonians to the second order, and adopting quadratic ansatz in inventory, yielding tractable Riccati-type ODE and closed-form expressions for approximate quotes and slippage thresholds. This approximation provides a fast surrogate for policy design and enables self-consistent calibration of rejection behaviour.

2026-03-08T18:00:03Z 18 pages, 10 figures Alexander Barzykin http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07692v1 2026-03-08T15:47:09Z

For a covariance matrix coming from a factor model of returns, we investigate the relationship between the long-only global minimum variance portfolio and the asset exposures to the factors. In the case of a 1-factor model, we provide a rigorous and explicit description of the long-only solution in terms of the parameters of the covariance matrix. For $q>1$ factors, we provide a description of the long-only portfolio in geometric terms. The results are illustrated with empirical daily returns of US stocks.

2026-03-08T15:47:09Z 25 pages, 6 figures Nick L. Gunther Alec N. Kercheval Ololade Sowunmi http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01048v3 2026-03-07T14:47:40Z

We introduce an ensemble learning method based on Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) for predicting conditional expected stock returns given stock-level and macro-economic information. Our ensemble learning approach significantly reduces the computational complexity inherent in GPR inference and lends itself to general online learning tasks. We conduct an empirical analysis on a large cross-section of US stocks from 1962 to 2016. We find that our method dominates existing machine learning models statistically and economically in terms of out-of-sample $R$-squared and Sharpe ratio of prediction-sorted portfolios. Exploiting the Bayesian nature of GPR, we introduce the mean-variance optimal portfolio with respect to the prediction uncertainty distribution of the expected stock returns. It appeals to an uncertainty averse investor and significantly dominates the equal- and value-weighted prediction-sorted portfolios, which outperform the S&P 500.

2022-12-02T09:37:29Z Damir Filipović Puneet Pasricha http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00784v2 2026-03-06T23:08:13Z

We develop a non-standard analysis framework for coherent risk measures and their finite-sample analogues, coherent risk estimators, building on recent work of Aichele, Cialenco, Jelito, and Pitera. Coherent risk measures on $L^\infty$ are realised as standard parts of internal support functionals on Loeb probability spaces, and coherent risk estimators arise as finite-grid restrictions. Our main results are: (i) a hyperfinite robust representation theorem that yields, as finite shadows, the robust representation results for coherent risk estimators; (ii) a discrete Kusuoka representation for law-invariant coherent risk estimators as suprema of mixtures of discrete expected shortfalls on $\{k/n:k=1,\ldots,n\}$; (iii) uniform almost sure consistency (with an explicit rate) for canonical spectral plug-in estimators over Lipschitz spectral classes; (iv) a Kusuoka-type plug-in consistency theorem under tightness and uniform estimation assumptions; (v) bootstrap validity for spectral plug-in estimators via an NSA reformulation of the functional delta method (under standard smoothness assumptions on $F_X$); and (vi) asymptotic normality obtained through a hyperfinite central limit theorem. The hyperfinite viewpoint provides a transparent probability-to-statistics dictionary: applying a risk measure to a law corresponds to evaluating an internal functional on a hyperfinite empirical measure and taking the standard part. We include a standardd self-contained introduction to the required non-standard tools.

2026-01-31T15:49:28Z 42 pp Tomasz Kania http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06733v1 2026-03-06T04:40:18Z

Credit risk scoring must support high-stakes lending decisions where data distributions change over time, probability estimates must be reliable, and group-level fairness is required. While modern machine learning models improve default prediction accuracy, they often produce poorly calibrated scores under distribution shift and may create unfair outcomes when trained without explicit constraints. This paper proposes Calibrated Credit Intelligence (CCI), a deployment-oriented framework that combines (i) a Bayesian neural risk scorer to capture epistemic uncertainty and reduce overconfident errors, (ii) a fairnessconstrained gradient boosting model to control group disparities while preserving strong tabular performance, and (iii) a shiftaware fusion strategy followed by post-hoc probability calibration to stabilize decision thresholds in later time periods. We evaluate CCI on the Home Credit Credit Risk Model Stability benchmark using a time-consistent split to reflect real-world drift. Compared with strong baselines (LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, TabNet, and a standalone Bayesian neural model), CCI achieves the best overall trade-off between discrimination, calibration, stability, and fairness. In particular, CCI reaches an AUC-ROC of 0.912 and an AUC-PR of 0.438, improves operational performance with Recall@1%FPR = 0.509, and reduces calibration error (Brier score 0.087, ECE 0.015). Under temporal shift, CCI shows a smaller AUC-PR drop from early to late periods (0.017), and it lowers group disparities (demographic parity gap 0.046, equal opportunity gap 0.037) compared to unconstrained boosting. These results indicate that CCI produces risk scores that are accurate, reliable, and more equitable under realistic deployment conditions.

2026-03-06T04:40:18Z 7 pages, table 1, figure 5 Srikumar Nayak http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06424v2 2026-03-05T21:16:22Z

Multivariate shortfall risk measures provide a principled framework for quantifying systemic risk and determining capital allocations prior to aggregation in interconnected financial systems. Despite their well established theoretical properties, the numerical estimation of multivariate shortfall risk and the corresponding optimal allocations remains computationally challenging, as existing Monte Carlo based approaches can be numerically expensive due to slow convergence. In this work, we develop a new class of single and multilevel numerical algorithms for estimating multivariate shortfall risk and the associated optimal allocations, based on a combination of Fourier inversion techniques and randomized quasi Monte Carlo (RQMC) sampling. Rather than operating in physical space, our approach evaluates the relevant expectations appearing in the risk constraint and its optimization in the frequency domain, where the integrands exhibit enhanced smoothness properties that are well suited for RQMC integration. We establish a rigorous mathematical framework for the resulting Fourier RQMC estimators, including convergence analysis and computational complexity bounds. Beyond the single level method, we introduce a multilevel RQMC scheme that exploits the geometric convergence of the underlying deterministic optimization algorithm to reduce computational cost while preserving accuracy. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed Fourier RQMC methods outperform sample average approximation and stochastic optimization benchmarks in terms of accuracy and computational cost across a range of models for the risk factors and loss structures. Consistent with the theoretical analysis, these results demonstrate improved asymptotic convergence and complexity rates relative to the benchmark methods, with additional savings achieved through the proposed multilevel RQMC construction.

2026-02-06T06:43:47Z Chiheb Ben Hammouda Truong Ngoc Nguyen http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05260v1 2026-03-05T15:10:54Z

Extreme values and the tail behavior of probability distributions are essential for quantifying and mitigating risk in complex systems of all kinds. In multivariate settings, accounting for correlations is crucial. Although extreme value analysis for infinite correlated systems remains an open challenge, we propose a practical framework for handling a large but finite number of correlated time series. We develop our approach for finance as a concrete example but emphasize its generality. We study the extremal behavior of high-frequency stock returns after rotating them into the eigenbasis of the correlation matrix. This separates and extracts various collective effects, including information on the correlated market as a whole and on correlated sectoral behavior from idiosyncratic features, while allowing us to use univariate tools of extreme value analysis. This holds even for high-frequency data where discretization effects normally complicate analysis. We employ a peaks-over-threshold approach and thereby fully avoid the analysis of block maxima. We estimate the tail shape of the rotated returns while explicitly accounting for nonstationarity, a key feature in finance and many other complex systems. Our framework facilitates tail risk estimation relative to larger trends and intraday seasonalities at both market and sectoral levels.

2026-03-05T15:10:54Z Benjamin Köhler Anton J. Heckens Thomas Guhr http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01109v2 2026-03-05T05:40:42Z

In the Vasicek credit portfolio model, tail risk is driven primarily by the asset-correlation parameter, yet empirically is subject to correlation risk. We propose a stochastic correlation extension of the Vasicek framework in which the correlation state evolves as a diffusion on the circle. This representation accommodates both non-mean-reverting and mean-reverting dependence regimes via circular Brownian motion and von Mises process, while retaining tractable transition densities. Conditionally on a fixed correlation state, we derive closed or semi-closed form expressions for the joint distribution of two assets, the joint first-passage (default) time distribution, and the joint survival probability. A simulation study quantifies how correlation volatility and persistence reshape joint default-at-horizon, survival, and joint barrier-crossing probabilities beyond marginal volatility effects. An empirical illustration using U.S. bank charge-off rates demonstrates economically interpretable time-variation in a dependence index and shows how inferred stochastic dependence translates into materially different joint tail-event probabilities. Overall, circular diffusion models provide a parsimonious and operationally tractable route to incorporating correlation risk into Vasicek structural credit calculations.

2026-03-01T13:50:17Z Dhruv Bansal Mayank Goud Sourav Majumdar http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04275v1 2026-03-04T16:57:08Z

We introduce inference methods for score decompositions, which partition scoring functions for predictive assessment into three interpretable components: miscalibration, discrimination, and uncertainty. Our estimation and inference relies on a linear recalibration of the forecasts, which is applicable to general multi-step ahead point forecasts such as means and quantiles due to its validity for both smooth and non-smooth scoring functions. This approach ensures desirable finite-sample properties, enables asymptotic inference, and establishes a direct connection to the classical Mincer-Zarnowitz regression. The resulting inference framework facilitates tests for equal forecast calibration or discrimination, which yield three key advantages. They enhance the information content of predictive ability tests by decomposing scores, deliver higher statistical power in certain scenarios, and formally connect scoring-function-based evaluation to traditional calibration tests, such as financial backtests. Applications demonstrate the method's utility. We find that for survey inflation forecasts, discrimination abilities can differ significantly even when overall predictive ability does not. In an application to financial risk models, our tests provide deeper insights into the calibration and information content of volatility and Value-at-Risk forecasts. By disentangling forecast accuracy from backtest performance, the method exposes critical shortcomings in current banking regulation.

2026-03-04T16:57:08Z Timo Dimitriadis Marius Puke