https://arxiv.org/api/H9vtfGxFl0eZhG/6BgorsuO9abg 2026-07-20T04:40:09Z 2980 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10700v1 2026-07-12T10:46:41Z

We introduce Self-Similar Generative Estimation (SS-GEN), a method for simulating multivariate tail events and estimating rare-event probabilities in both heavy and light-tailed settings. SS-GEN exploits asymptotic tail structure to decompose the tail distribution into an explicit radial component and a nonparametric angular component, reducing tail learning to a compact-domain problem that can be handled by off-the-shelf deep generative models. The resulting sampler generates representative extreme scenarios and supports probability estimation far beyond the observed data. Under mild nonparametric tail assumptions, we show that the SS-GEN density is asymptotically exact in the tail, with vanishing uniform relative error for regularly varying distributions and vanishing uniform log-relative error for Weibull-type distributions. Unlike existing approaches that rely on specialized architectures or parametric tail specifications, SS-GEN leverages asymptotic tail structure to enable standard generative models to generate representative extreme samples and estimate rare-event probabilities beyond the observed data.

2026-07-12T10:46:41Z Mantu Gupta Anand Deo http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03874v4 2026-07-11T22:18:52Z

Cryptocurrency markets exceed USD 3 trillion in capitalisation, yet practitioners lack an interpretable, channel-decomposed composite for characterising crypto-native systemic stress. We introduce the Aggregated Systemic Risk Index (ASRI), built from four weighted sub-indices -- Stablecoin Concentration Risk (30%), DeFi Liquidity Risk (25%), Contagion Risk (25%, implemented as a TradFi-stress proxy), and Regulatory Opacity Risk (20%) -- with a Diebold--Yilmaz connectedness series computed on the sub-indices as network benchmark. We evaluate ASRI retrospectively against four crises (Terra/Luna, Celsius/3AC, FTX, SVB) and give a methodological account of how autocorrelation- and block-structure-robust inference reshapes apparent crisis-detection strength. The event-study signal is inconclusive: heavily serially correlated (AR(1) $\approx 0.8$--$0.9$), with placebo dates clearing the nominal threshold as often as crises. Fixed-threshold detection flags three of four events with $\approx$19-day average lead ($\approx$5 days under a responsive specification); walk-forward thresholds flag 4/4 but at high false-positive cost -- evidence against look-ahead bias, not a clean prediction record. ASRI's day-level discrimination (AUROC 0.866) beats only the circular D--Y comparator (0.670); it is statistically indistinguishable from its strongest sub-index (0.851), PC1 (0.858), and a standalone VIX series (0.875, $p=0.58$). We read aggregation's value as interpretive -- channel attribution, lead time, and regime structure in one auditable composite -- not as discriminative gain. With four crisis events the binding power limit, ASRI is a transparent, reproducible, retrospective monitoring framework targeting crypto-native vulnerabilities that SRISK and CoVaR are not built to capture, not a validated early-warning system. Out of sample it classifies the 2025 Bybit hack as non-systemic.

2026-02-01T08:42:23Z 109 pages, 7 figures, 39 tables. Code at https://github.com/studiofarzulla/asri ; live dashboard: https://asri.dissensus.ai Murad Farzulla Andrew Maksakov http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05155v3 2026-07-11T04:48:35Z

This paper studies decentralized risk-sharing on networks. In particular, we consider a model where agents are nodes in a given network structure. Agents directly connected by edges in the network are referred to as friends. We study actuarially fair risk-sharing under the assumption that only friends can share risk, and we characterize the optimal signed linear risk-sharing rule in this network setting. Subsequently, we consider a special case of this model where all the friends of an agent take on an equal share of the agent's risk, and establish a connection to the graph Laplacian. Our results are illustrated with several examples.

2026-02-05T00:16:46Z 24 pages, 2 figures Heather N. Fogarty Sooie-Hoe Loke Nicholas F. Marshall Enrique A. Thomann http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09566v1 2026-07-10T16:12:58Z

Decision-making is posing an increasingly formidable challenge to investors because of the growing number of alternatives available in financial markets. A hot area of research over the past few decades has been portfolio optimization that seeks to determine how much an investor should invest in which asset. Introducing real-world conditions to the optimization model turns the problem into an NP-hard one for whose solution exact methods become inefficient; hence, researchers have turned to evolutionary algorithms to approximate solutions. In this paper, strengthening strategies are presented for multi-objective evolutionary algorithms that can provide a faster convergence rate and extensive search ability in the portfolio optimization problem under the cardinality constraint. To implement those features, a unique solution representation, a novel operator, and new repair mechanisms are introduced for solving the aforementioned problem in which lower and upper limits are set on the number of assets in the portfolio. For this purpose, new mating strategies along with the aforesaid package are implemented in well-known multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to solve the problem. The customized algorithms are subsequently tested against traditional ones using well-known market indices as benchmarks. Results indicate that the proposed strategy not only provides better approximations but also converges faster as well at no loss of performance with an increasing number of assets in the market.

2026-07-10T16:12:58Z Danial Ramezani Mostafa Abouei Ardakan http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09556v1 2026-07-10T16:02:16Z

Passive management has increasingly won popularity over the past few years because of its advantages, such as lower management fees and transaction costs. Index tracking endeavors to reproduce the performance of an index with smaller sets of assets. In this paper, a novel formulation is proposed that is not only more robust than the existing ones but also performs better on out-of-sample data and tracks indices over long periods without any considerable deviation or the need for rebalancing. Solving index tracking problems in a polynomial time is a challenging task due to their NP-hard nature. To address this issue, a novel heuristic based on metaheuristic algorithms and local branching is also developed to solve the proposed model. The heuristic enjoys not only the exploration capabilities of a genetic algorithm but the characteristics of local search algorithms as well. The data from the OR library is used to verify the capabilities of the proposed heuristic in comparison with commercial solvers. Results indicate that not only is the heuristic able to converge to optimal solutions for not-so-large problem sizes, but the portfolios it generates also outperform those yielded by commercial solvers in terms of both in-sample and out-of-sample data.

2026-07-10T16:02:16Z Danial Ramezani Mostafa Abouei Ardakan Mohamadreza Dehghani Ahmadabad http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08291v1 2026-07-09T09:34:50Z

We study sequential decision making under evolving uncertainty in high-frequency financial markets, where changing market dynamics continually challenge static decision policies. We show that robustness has two economically meaningful dimensions: uncertainty tolerance, which determines how much uncertainty the decision maker allows, and action robustness, which governs how conservatively decisions respond. Robustness is not merely protection against model misspecification, but a state-dependent mechanism that reshapes sequential decision behaviors. Simulation and empirical evidence show that action robustness has a substantially larger impact than uncertainty tolerance. Moreover, excessive robustness may reduce profitability in illiquid markets by limiting execution opportunities.

2026-07-09T09:34:50Z Ying Chen Hoa Nguyen Julian Sester Hoang Hai Tran Yijiong Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02126v2 2026-07-08T15:41:30Z

Shorting for hedging exposes to risk when the market dynamics is uncertain. Managing uncertainty and risk exposure is key in portfolio management practice. This paper develops a robust framework for dynamic minimum-variance hedging that explicitly accounts for forecast uncertainty in volatility and covariance estimation to achieve empirical stability and reduced turnover, further improving other standard performance metrics. The approach combines high-frequency realized variance and covariance measures, autoregressive models for multi-step volatility forecasting, and a box-uncertainty robust optimization scheme. We derive a closed-form solution for the robust hedge ratio, which adjusts the standard minimum-variance hedge by incorporating variance and covariance forecast uncertainty. Using a diversified sample of equity, bond, and commodity ETFs over 2016-2024, we show that robust hedge ratios are more stable and entail lower turnover than standard dynamic hedges. While overall variance reduction is comparable, the robust approach improves downside protection and risk-adjusted performance, particularly when transaction costs are considered. Bootstrap evidence supports the statistical significance of these gains.

2026-04-02T15:02:21Z Adele Ravagnani Mattia Chiappari Andrea Flori Piero Mazzarisi Marco Patacca http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07465v1 2026-07-08T14:30:02Z

Markowitz defined portfolio risk as an internal property, built from the covariance among a book's own holdings rather than the distance to any index. Seventy years of simplification reversed that. The market beta of CAPM, the fixed style and industry axes of Barra-type models, and the promotion of benchmark deviation to the definition of risk all traded the inward view for an external one. Risk became distance from an index. For a fund that fits no benchmark, that trade fails. A global book concentrated in a few markets and a few innovation sectors has no natural index to deviate from, and the active-risk number it produces measures the mismatch, not the risk. We return to the covariance. Principal component analysis (PCA) recovers the systematic structure inside the portfolio directly from its own returns. PCA has always carried one cost: its factors resist a plain-English reading. We clear that with a generative-AI labelling layer. It names the leading factors, ranked by their actual contribution to risk rather than by universe variance, and a deterministic rubric keeps it from inventing structure the loadings do not contain. Around this sit four independent signals. Density-based clustering with a mismatch ratio flags groups whose risk outruns their capital. A sign-invariant PCA Risk Score (PRS) marks the names that build the dominant factor bets. A standalone Bleed score catches the slow capital destroyers PCA cannot see. A trailing-return timing gate routes disagreements between the risk signals and recent price action to human judgment. We run the full engine on a proxy global-innovation book of thirty names over one year.

2026-07-08T14:30:02Z 10 pages, 5 figures. Results are computed on an illustrative proxy portfolio and are not investment advice Swaraj Gambhir Thanu George Kairavi Sivasankar http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15355v3 2026-07-08T08:09:25Z

This paper investigates optimal investment and insurance strategies under a mean-variance criterion with path-dependent effects. We use a rough volatility model with a power kernel and a Hawkes process with a modified Omori kernel (a power kernel) to capture the market's path dependence. By extending the functional Ito calculus to the mixed fractional Brownian-Hawkes process, we derive the corresponding path-dependent extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation and solve its explicit solution. For numerical analysis, we first calibrate the Hawkes process with the Wenchuan earthquake data, the most devastating earthquake in China. We find that the power kernel outperforms the exponential one in fitting the earthquake intensity. Our numerical results reveal that the path-dependent effect strongly depends on the horizon length. For the investment strategy, the individual is more risk-seeking when considering the rougher volatility in the short horizon, but more risk-averse at the beginning of the long horizon. For the insurance strategy, a faster decay in intensity increases individuals' demand for catastrophe insurance in the short horizon, but decreases initially in the long horizon. However, we find that the horizon effect may disappear when the shift parameter in the modified Omori kernel approaches zero or exceeds one. Our findings indicate that ignoring path-dependent effects would lead to significant underinsurance and highlight its importance in catastrophe risk management.

2025-08-21T08:34:18Z Liyuan Cui Wenyuan Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06204v1 2026-07-07T12:27:54Z

Many quantitative finance methods and applications are formulated in terms of option-implied risk-neutral marginals rather than directly in terms of option prices. Representative examples include martingale optimal transport, Bass local-volatility calibration, scenario analysis, and option-implied tail-risk measurement. The desired risk-neutral marginals should define a genuine probability law on the entire support, reproduce the input arbitrage-free option prices exactly, be free of butterfly and calendar arbitrage, and admit efficient evaluation of the density, distribution function, and quantiles, as well as Monte Carlo sampling. Existing methods typically optimize only a subset of these properties, depending on their intended purpose. This leaves a gap between upstream arbitrage-free option prices and the readily usable risk-neutral marginals required by downstream applications. We propose an explicit construction of risk-neutral marginals from discrete arbitrage-free option prices. On the observed strike range, probability mass is assigned interval by interval to exactly reproduce the input option prices. Outside the observed range, closed-form power-law tails complete the distribution by satisfying price and slope boundary conditions and allocating the remaining probability mass. Butterfly- and calendar-arbitrage-freeness are guaranteed by construction. The construction is feasible by design and computationally efficient. The resulting marginal laws admit closed-form densities, distribution functions, quantiles, and efficient Monte Carlo sampling. Numerical experiments on synthetic SSVI data and S\&P~500 market data demonstrate that the proposed construction efficiently and robustly produces marginals satisfying all of these properties in practice.

2026-07-07T12:27:54Z Preprint Hao Qin Ruozhong Yang Charlie Che Liming Feng http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05484v1 2026-07-06T16:45:11Z

The adoption of non-parametric machine learning models for regulatory capital estimation introduces a fundamental governance challenge: the inability to explain model outputs in a manner auditable by supervisory bodies. This 'black box' problem remains a major barrier to the adoption of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and related ML architectures in ICAAP and CCAR workflows despite their predictive advantages over traditional parametric approaches. This paper addresses this barrier through SHARC (SHAP for Regulatory Capital), an explainability framework for the Hybrid GPR-HS architecture and its stress-testing extension. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), derived from cooperative game theory and satisfying the properties of Local Accuracy, Missingness, Consistency, and Efficiency, are applied to Stressed Value-at-Risk (SVaR) outputs under three macro scenarios: West Asia War, Climate Risk, and AI Bubble/Regulatory Burden. SHARC decomposes SVaR into baseline, mean-driven, and volatility-driven components, enabling transparent linkage between scenario design and capital outcomes. Two findings emerge. First, SHARC consistently links non-linear SVaR outputs to underlying scenario inputs, confirming framework fidelity and providing auditable traceability of capital drivers. Second, under stress conditions, the mean return component (directional loss magnitude) dominates the variance component (volatility baseline) in determining capital levels, with implications for capital limit-setting, position management, and hedging strategy. The results establish SHARC as a regulator-aligned explainability layer that makes the Hybrid GPR-HS framework fully auditable and consistent with FRTB, ICAAP Pillar 2, and CCAR transparency requirements.

2026-07-06T16:45:11Z Builds on: Paper 1: arXiv:2605.17275, Paper 2: arXiv:2606.07575 Ujjwala Vadrevu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30363v2 2026-07-06T15:50:09Z

This paper studies how a risk holder should combine self-protection and self-insurance strategies when market insurance is absent. Self-protection reduces loss frequency, while self-insurance reduces loss severity. The risk holder incurs a joint risk-reduction cost that allows technological interaction between the two strategies and evaluates residual risk using either Value-at-Risk or Tail Value-at-Risk. In a Bernoulli model, we show that Value-at-Risk leads to a threshold-driven solution in which the optimal strategy is either no risk reduction, pure self-protection, or pure self-insurance, thereby exhibiting a substitution-type structure between the two risk-reduction strategies. By contrast, although Tail Value-at-Risk also admits a left-region/right-region decomposition, its left-region problem creates a direct residual frequency-severity interaction, making the local problem non-convex even in the Bernoulli setting. We solve this problem using an isoquant geometry method based on the marginal-balance curves for self-protection and self-insurance. The analysis identifies boundary, extreme constrained, touching, and crossing candidates, and shows how the confidence level and the cost technology determine whether self-protection and self-insurance behave as substitutes or complements. Illustrative examples compare the Value-at-Risk and Tail Value-at-Risk strategies, show how the confidence level changes the relevant isoquant geometry, and demonstrate that multiple crossings may generate non-unique optimal joint risk-reduction strategies.

2026-06-29T14:27:40Z Wing Fung Chong http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04392v1 2026-07-05T16:36:06Z

In static risk measurement, law invariance expresses the principle that the risk of a position should depend only on its distribution, and not on the particular probability space on which it is represented. In a dynamic setting, the same principle leads naturally to adapted law invariance: the risk assessment should depend only on the probabilistic structure of the financial position together with the way information about it is revealed over time. We show that, for time-consistent risk measures, adapted law invariance is equivalent to a recursive one-step conditional-law representation. More precisely, assuming Fatou regularity, the one-step risk evaluations are exactly conditional lifts of static law-invariant risk measures, and the full dynamic risk measure is obtained by backward composition of these one-step maps. Convexity and coherence of the dynamic risk measure are characterized by the corresponding properties of the static one-step risk measures. This identifies adapted law invariance as the dynamic counterpart of ordinary law invariance. It also clarifies the strength of terminal-law invariance, as it appears in the rigidity theorem of Kupper and Schachermayer: it does not distinguish risks with the same distribution but different times of resolution. We further obtain an adapted Kusuoka representation in the coherent case and establish an extension of the Kupper--Schachermayer theorem.

2026-07-05T16:36:06Z Mathias Beiglböck Silvana M. Pesenti Maxime Sylvestre http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03669v1 2026-07-04T02:45:02Z

We propose the Split-Session Cluster GARCH model for heavy-tailed multivariate dependence among asset returns decomposed into overnight and intraday components. The model uses convolution-$t$ distributions to allow tail behavior to differ across clusters defined by trading sessions and, within each session, by economic sectors. It also accommodates block-structured conditional correlation matrices, preserving parsimony and scalability in high-dimensional settings. The resulting likelihood remains tractable and yields a score-driven specification for dynamic correlations. We apply the model to U.S. equity returns in six-asset and 100-asset applications. The results reveal pronounced tail heterogeneity between overnight and intraday returns. Model comparisons show that session-specific tail parameters substantially improve fit relative to a common multivariate-$t$ specification, while sector-level tail partitioning delivers additional gains concentrated mainly in the overnight component. In the 100-asset application, asset-level tail heterogeneity delivers the strongest out-of-sample likelihood and global minimum-variance (GMV) portfolio performance.

2026-07-04T02:45:02Z Xinxian Chen Peter Reinhard Hansen Chen Tong http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03082v1 2026-07-03T08:14:43Z

This paper examines portfolio optimization and tail-risk analytics for a heterogeneous universe of actively managed investment funds. Using daily Bloomberg data for 30 funds from 4 December 2020 to 24 December 2025, the study evaluates buy-and-hold, mean--variance, CVaR-based, and tangency-type strategies under long-only and long--short constraints. The sample consists predominantly of actively managed ETFs, with PTTRX retained as an actively managed fixed-income mutual-fund comparator. The results show substantial heterogeneity across thematic equity, fixed-income, income-oriented, multi-asset, and alternative strategies, creating both diversification opportunities and meaningful differences in volatility, drawdown behavior, downside exposure, and tail risk. Historical results indicate that tangency-type portfolios are generally the strongest competitors to the buy-and-hold benchmark in cumulative and risk-adjusted terms, while minimum-variance and CVaR-minimizing portfolios sacrifice upside participation for stronger downside control. Dynamic allocation does not improve all strategies uniformly: the long-only dynamic CVaR-95 portfolio is consistently attractive across several risk-adjusted criteria, whereas long--short dynamic tangency-CVaR portfolios perform strongly but are more sensitive to turnover and implementation costs. Tail-risk diagnostics based on empirical VaR, Expected Shortfall, maximum drawdown, left-tail Hill estimators, and POT--GPD methods show that downside tail exposure remains meaningful after portfolio aggregation. Overall, actively managed ETFs are best evaluated as components of a joint investment opportunity set in which dependence structure, portfolio design, dynamic allocation, implementation frictions, and tail-risk exposure jointly shape performance.

2026-07-03T08:14:43Z William W. Lamptey Nicholas Appiah Abootaleb Shirvani Priscilla Ati-Tay Svetlozar T. Rachev Frank J. Fabozzi