https://arxiv.org/api/H9vtfGxFl0eZhG/6BgorsuO9abg 2026-03-20T10:42:36Z 2819 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04541v3 2026-03-15T16:58:19Z

This technical report presents a stochastic model for pricing weather derivatives and devising hedging strategies tailored to Indian markets. We model temperature dynamics using a modified Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with jumps to account for sudden shocks, such as heatwaves and coldwaves. Historical data from 12 Indian states (1951-2023) is used for calibration, and Monte Carlo simulations are employed under the risk-neutral measure to price Heating Degree Days (HDD), Cooling Degree Days (CDD), and extreme event options. Sensitivity analysis reveals that a 20% increase in volatility leads to an approximate 4.2% increase in option prices, highlighting the critical impact of volatility on derivative pricing. Results show that HDD options in colder states like Himachal Pradesh are significantly more expensive, with prices reaching up to INR 684,693, while CDD options in hotter states like Gujarat are priced higher, up to INR 262,986. A comprehensive portfolio analysis indicates that investing INR 120,000 in HDD put options in Uttar Pradesh yields an expected payoff of INR 132,369, resulting in a return on investment (ROI) of 10.3%. Conversely, a similar investment in Karnataka yields a negative ROI of -66.7% due to its milder climate. Hedging strategies are tailored to each state's climatic risk, with recommendations to buy 90.66 HDD put options at a strike of 90.89 in Uttar Pradesh and invest in CDD call options in Gujarat. These insights offer practical solutions for managing temperature-related financial risk in energy and agriculture, providing actionable, state-specific hedging strategies for diverse climatic scenarios in India.

2024-09-06T18:11:29Z The authors have withdrawn this paper due to data processing and calibration errors that caused inconsistencies in option pricing and hedging results. We are also revising the jump process to properly account for extreme weather seasonality. The framework is being corrected and all findings will be recalculated Soumil Hooda Shubham Sharma Kunal Bansal http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16200v2 2026-03-14T17:48:35Z

This note outlines an approach to stress testing of covariance of financial time series, in the context of financial risk management. It discusses how the geodesic distance between covariance matrices implies a notion of plausibility of covariance stress tests. In this approach, correlation stress tests span a submanifold of constant determinant of the Fisher--Rao manifold of covariance matrices. A parsimonious geometrically invariant definition of arbitrarily large correlation stress tests is proposed, and a few examples are discussed.

2025-03-20T14:46:17Z 3 figures Piotr Chmielowski http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17945v2 2026-03-14T13:52:00Z

Financial institutions face a trade-off between predictive accuracy and interpretability when deploying machine learning models for credit risk. Monotonicity constraints align model behavior with domain knowledge, but their performance cost - the price of monotonicity - is not well quantified. This paper benchmarks monotone-constrained versus unconstrained gradient boosting models for credit probability of default across five public datasets and three libraries. We define the Price of Monotonicity (PoM) as the relative change in standard performance metrics when moving from unconstrained to constrained models, estimated via paired comparisons with bootstrap uncertainty. In our experiments, PoM in AUC ranges from essentially zero to about 2.9 percent: constraints are almost costless on large datasets (typically less than 0.2 percent, often indistinguishable from zero) and most costly on smaller datasets with extensive constraint coverage (around 2-3 percent). Thus, appropriately specified monotonicity constraints can often deliver interpretability with small accuracy losses, particularly in large-scale credit portfolios.

2025-12-14T22:18:05Z 56 pages. This version: December 2025. Includes multi-dataset benchmark results and diagnostic analyses; replication code and configuration files are available via the GitHub repository referenced in the paper Petr Koklev http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07472v3 2026-03-13T15:30:13Z

We establish a connection between dependence structures and subclasses of distortion riskmetrics under which the latter are additive. A new notion of positive dependence, called partial comonotonicity, is developed, which nests the existing concepts of comonotonicity and single-point concentration. For two random variables, being comonotonic with a third one does not imply that they are comonotonic; instead, this defines an instance of partial comonotonicity. Any specific instance of partial comonotonicity uniquely characterizes a class of distortion riskmetrics through additivity under this dependence structure. An implication of this result is the characterization of the Expected Shortfall using single-point concentration.

2025-06-09T06:46:48Z Muqiao Huang http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03551v2 2026-03-13T14:38:40Z

Under Solvency II, the Value-at-Risk (VaR) is applied, although there is broad consensus that the Expected Shortfall (ES) constitutes a more appropriate risk measure. Moving towards ES would necessitate specifying the corresponding ES level. The recently introduced Probability Equivalent Level of VaR and ES (PELVE) determines this by requiring that ES equals the prescribed VaR for a given future payoff, reflecting the situation of an individual insurer. We incorporate the regulator's perspective by proposing PELVE-inspired methods for multiple insurers. We analyze existence and uniqueness of the resulting ES levels, derive expressions for elliptically distributed payoffs and establish limit results for multivariate regularly distributed payoffs. A case study highlights that the choice of method is crucial when payoffs arise from different distribution families. We provide recommendations which of our PELVE-inspired methods are most appropriate in certain scenarios.

2025-11-05T15:33:07Z Christian Laudagé Jörn Sass http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00299v2 2026-03-13T14:36:05Z

We investigate the static portfolio selection problem of S-shaped and non-concave utility maximization under first-order and second-order stochastic dominance (SD) constraints. In many S-shaped utility optimization problems, one should require a liquidation boundary to guarantee the existence of a finite concave envelope function. A first-order SD (FSD) constraint can replace this requirement and provide an alternative for risk management. We explicitly solve the optimal solution under a general S-shaped utility function with a first-order stochastic dominance constraint. However, the second-order SD (SSD) constrained problem under non-concave utilities is difficult to solve analytically due to the invalidity of Sion's maxmin theorem. For this sake, we propose a numerical algorithm to obtain a plausible and sub-optimal solution for general non-concave utilities. The key idea is to detect the poor performance region with respect to the SSD constraints, characterize its structure and modify the distribution on that region to obtain (sub-)optimality. A key financial insight is that the decision maker should follow the SD constraint on the poor performance scenario while conducting the unconstrained optimal strategy otherwise. We provide numerical experiments to show that our algorithm effectively finds a sub-optimal solution in many cases. Finally, we develop an algorithm-guided piecewise-neural-network framework to learn the solution of the SSD problem, which demonstrates accelerated convergence compared to standard neural network approaches.

2025-11-29T03:41:35Z 30 pages Zeyun Hu Yang Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12767v1 2026-03-13T08:12:14Z

In this paper we introduce a generalization of classical risk measures in which the risk is represented by a step function taking two values, corresponding to two endogenously determined market regimes. This extends the traditional framework where risk measures map random variables to single real numbers. For the quadratic loss function, we study the optimization problem of determining the optimal regime threshold and corresponding values. In the case of log-concave distributions we give conditions for the uniqueness of the regime changing. We treat the case of one dimension and also of multi-dimensions for elliptic distributions. We demonstrate the necessity of convexity through counterexamples.

2026-03-13T08:12:14Z Mihaela-Adriana Nistor Ionel Popescu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11897v1 2026-03-12T13:14:12Z

The estimation of marginal loan write-off probabilities is a non-trivial task when modelling the loss given default (LGD) risk parameter in credit risk. We explore two types of survival models in estimating the overall write-off probability over default spell time, where these probabilities form the term-structure of write-off risk in aggregate. These survival models include a discrete-time hazard (DtH) model and a conditional inference survival tree. Both models are compared to a cross-sectional logistic regression model for write-off risk. All of these (first-stage) models are then ensconced in a broader two-stage LGD-modelling approach, wherein a loss severity model is estimated in the second stage. In expanding the model suite, a novel dichotomisation step is introduced for collapsing the write-off probability into a 0/1-value, prior to LGD-calculation. A benchmark study is subsequently conducted amongst the resulting LGD-models. We find that the DtH-model outperforms other two-stage LGD-models admirably across most diagnostics. However, a single-stage LGD-model still had the best results, likely due to the peculiar `L-shaped' LGD-distribution in our data. Ultimately, we believe that our tutorial-style work can enhance LGD-modelling practices when estimating the expected credit loss under IFRS 9.

2026-03-12T13:14:12Z 16871 words, 44 pages, 12 Figures Arno Botha Mohammed Gabru Marcel Muller Janette Larney http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07787v3 2026-03-12T11:24:58Z

We investigate the extremal aggregation behavior of Value-at-Risk (VaR) -- that is, its additivity properties across all probability levels -- for sums of one-sided random variables. For risks supported on \([0,\infty)\), we show that VaR sub-additivity is impossible except in the degenerate case of exact additivity, which holds only under co-monotonicity. To characterize when VaR is instead fully super-additive, we introduce two structural conditions: negative simplex dependence (NSD) for the joint distribution and simplex dominance (SD) for a margin-dependent functional. Together, these conditions provide a unified and easily verifiable framework that accommodates non-identical margins, heavy-tailed laws, and a wide spectrum of negative dependence structures. All results extend to random variables with arbitrary finite lower or upper endpoints, yielding sharp constraints on when strict sub- or super-additivity can occur.

2025-12-08T18:17:42Z Nawaf Mohammed http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11660v1 2026-03-12T08:28:48Z

Individual claims reserving has not yet become established in actuarial practice. We attribute this to the absence of a satisfactory methodology: existing approaches tend to be either overly complex or insufficiently flexible and robust for practical use. Building on the classical chain-ladder (CL) method, we introduced a new perspective on individual claims reserving in Richman and Wüthrich [arXiv:2602.15385]. This manuscript has sparked considerable discussion within the actuarial community. The aim of the present paper is to continue and deepen that discussion, with the ultimate goal of advancing toward a new standard for micro-level reserving.

2026-03-12T08:28:48Z Ronald Richman Mario V. Wüthrich http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13325v2 2026-03-12T03:15:38Z

In this paper, we consider catastrophe stop-loss reinsurance valuation for a reinsurance company with dynamic contagion claims. To deal with conventional and emerging catastrophic events, we propose the use of a compound dynamic contagion process for the catastrophic component of the liability. Under the premise that there is an absence of arbitrage opportunity in the market, we obtain arbitrage-free premiums for these contracts. To this end, the Esscher transform is adopted to specify an equivalent martingale probability measure. We show that reinsurers have various ways of levying the security loading on the net premiums to quantify the catastrophic liability in light of the growing challenges posed by emerging risks arising from climate change, cyberattacks, and pandemics. We numerically compare arbitrage-free catastrophe stop-loss reinsurance premiums via the Monte Carlo simulation method. We also compare them with those from generalised compound Hawkes/compound Cox cases. Sensitivity analyses are performed by changing the retention level, the Esscher parameters and the intensity parameters.

2025-02-18T23:04:27Z Jiwook Jang Patrick J. Laub Tak Kuen Siu Hongbiao Zhao http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10327v2 2026-03-12T01:30:13Z

Various financial market scenarios may cause heterogeneous risk assessments among analysts, which motivates the usage of the Generalized Risk Measure in Fadina et al. (2024, Finance and Stochastics). Effectively synthesizing these diverse assessments avoids over-relying on a single, potentially flawed or conservative forecast and promotes more robust decision-making. Motivated by this, we establish analytical characterizations of the Weighted Generalized Risk Measure (WGRM) under both discrete and continuous settings. Building upon the WGRM, we incorporate the Fundamental Risk Quadrangle (FRQ) in Rockafellar and Uryasev (2013, Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science) into the Weighted Risk Quadrangle (WRQ) and show that the intrinsic relationships among risk, deviation, regret, error, and statistics in FRQ are preserved under weighted aggregation across scenarios. Moreover, we demonstrate that certain complex risk optimization problems under the WGRM can be reformulated as tractable linear programs through the WRQ structure, thus ensuring computational feasibility. Finally, the WGRM and WRQ framework is applied to empirical analyses using constituents of the NASDAQ 100 and S&P 500 indices across recession and expansion regimes, which validates that WGRM-based portfolios exhibit superior risk-adjusted performance and enhanced downside resilience and effectively mitigate losses arising from erroneous single-scenario judgments.

2026-03-11T01:51:15Z Yang Liu Yunran Wei Xintao Ye http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05155v2 2026-03-11T20:49:08Z

This paper studies decentralized risk-sharing on networks. In particular, we consider a model where agents are nodes in a given network structure. Agents directly connected by edges in the network are referred to as friends. We study actuarially fair risk-sharing under the assumption that only friends can share risk, and we characterize the optimal signed linear risk-sharing rule in this network setting. Subsequently, we consider a special case of this model where all the friends of an agent take on an equal share of the agent's risk, and establish a connection to the graph Laplacian. Our results are illustrated with several examples.

2026-02-05T00:16:46Z 21 pages, 2 figures. Added missing i=j condition on equations 4 and 8, corrected matrix and objective function value on example in 2.4.4 Heather N. Fogarty Sooie-Hoe Loke Nicholas F. Marshall Enrique A. Thomann http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10569v1 2026-03-11T09:24:14Z

We study market making in aggregator-routed RFQ markets where platform routing depends on slowly varying dealer performance scores. We propose a two-tier stochastic control model that separates RFQ-level price competition from a macro routing layer: tier A represents aggregator flow whose opportunity intensity is multiplied by a promotion gate driven by the dealer's win score, while tier B captures background flow that is not gated and does not update the score. RFQs arrive in multiple sizes and the dealer chooses a size-ladder of bid/ask offsets; conditional on winning, trades earn spread minus an adverse selection correction and contribute to inventory risk. The resulting Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation admits a reduced Bergault-Guéant operator form with explicit win/lose branches for the score on tier A. Using the envelope-theorem argument, we express optimal controls through derivatives of the one-dimensional reduced Hamiltonians, yielding an interpretable mapping from optimal win probabilities to optimal offsets. In the long-memory regime, we derive an adiabatic approximation that separates fast inventory dynamics from slow score dynamics. A quadratic inventory ansatz and quadratic Hamiltonian expansion lead to a quasi-stationarity inventory-curvature scaling and a one-dimensional score drift field. For steep (logistic) promotion gates, the score dynamics can exhibit fold bifurcations, bistability, and hysteresis, producing an endogenous "campaign vs. harvest" pattern in optimal quoting. Numerical experiments confirm this behaviour and highlight the stabilizing role of background flow in maintaining inventory-mixing capacity even when the dealer is weakly promoted.

2026-03-11T09:24:14Z 12 pages, 8 figures Alexander Barzykin http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10202v1 2026-03-10T20:06:53Z

Generating synthetic financial time series that preserve statistical properties of real market data is essential for stress testing, risk model validation, and scenario design. Existing approaches, from parametric models to deep generative networks, struggle to simultaneously reproduce heavy-tailed distributions, negligible linear autocorrelation, and persistent volatility clustering. We propose a hybrid hidden Markov framework that discretizes continuous excess growth rates into Laplace quantile-defined market states and augments regime switching with a Poisson-driven jump-duration mechanism to enforce realistic tail-state dwell times. Parameters are estimated by direct transition counting, bypassing the Baum-Welch EM algorithm. Synthetic data quality is evaluated using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling pass rates for distributional fidelity, and ACF mean absolute error for temporal structure. Applied to ten years of SPY data across 1,000 simulated paths, the framework achieves KS and AD pass rates exceeding 97% and 91% in-sample and 94% out-of-sample (calendar year 2025), partially reproducing the ARCH effect that standard regime-switching models miss. No single model dominates all quality dimensions: GARCH(1,1) reproduces volatility clustering more accurately but fails distributional tests (5.5% KS pass rate), while the standard HMM without jumps achieves higher distributional fidelity but cannot generate persistent high-volatility regimes. The proposed framework offers the best joint quality profile across distributional, temporal, and tail-coverage metrics. A Single-Index Model extension propagates the SPY factor path to a 424-asset universe, enabling scalable correlated synthetic path generation while preserving cross-sectional correlation structure.

2026-03-10T20:06:53Z Abdulrahman Alswaidan Jeffrey D. Varner