https://arxiv.org/api/Wv6cD2R9q4nMzOVD/+azgntj4i4 2026-07-22T22:17:56Z 2985 135 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18895v2 2026-05-18T03:04:04Z

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in translating model-based explanations into human-readable narratives. This study evaluates whether LLMs can serve as post-hoc explainability interfaces for credit risk models, focusing on their ability to preserve feature-importance rankings and generate autonomous explanations. Using a LendingClub dataset, we compare LLM outputs with SHAP and coefficient-based attributions on three major LLMs, including GPT-4-turbo, Claude-Sonnet-4.5, and Gemini-2.5-Flash. Results indicate that LLMs reliably reproduce reference rankings under controlled prompts but show limited alignment when generating explanations autonomously. These findings suggest that LLMs are best deployed as narrative interfaces rather than substitutes for formal attribution methods in credit risk governance.

2026-02-21T16:35:06Z 39 pages, 1 figure Wenxi Geng Dingyuan Liu Liya Li Yiqing Wang 10.1111/exsy.70351 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17768v1 2026-05-18T02:38:25Z

We study actuarial fairness in China's notional defined contribution (NDC) pension system when mortality differs across income groups. Under current rules, individual account balances are converted into monthly benefits using an official annuity divisor that depends only on retirement age. We develop a mortality-differentiated Lee-Carter framework with group-specific baseline mortality schedules and a common period effect, estimated by combining national mortality data for 1994-2020 with CHARLS subgroup data for 2011-2020. To model cross-group mortality parsimoniously under limited data, we parameterize the baseline schedules using Hermite splines. Applying the model to China's NDC system, we find substantial actuarial unfairness in the current age-only divisor. The subsidy rises monotonically with income, implying both an aggregate actuarial shortfall and a reverse transfer from poorer to richer retirees. We then compare four implementable income-dependent annuitization rules, ranging from a simple bracket design to marginal-rule alternatives, and show that all substantially reduce the reverse transfer.

2026-05-18T02:38:25Z Xiaoyu Dong Hong Li Kenneth Q. Zhou Xiaobai Zhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03499v2 2026-05-17T17:46:12Z

Daily Value-at-Risk (VaR) for option books requires more than an accurate quantile forecast. It first requires a precise definition of the loss target. Before any model is evaluated, the protocol must fix the book construction rule, the marking rule for the next day, the loss scale, and the information set available at forecast time. Common pipelines instead apply VaR methods to underlying returns or preconstructed book loss series, leaving these operational choices outside the statistical target. We propose a marking-aware sequential VaR recalibration framework that targets normalized book-level loss directly, restricts the forecast state to information available at forecast time, and recalibrates an upper tail VaR using only past forecast residuals. In out-of-sample evaluation on S\&P 500 index (SPX) and QQQ exchange-traded fund (ETF) options, the reference VaR undercovers all three books in both markets. Sequential VaR recalibration moves exceedance rates close to the target and delivers the best aggregate performance across books, with the lowest average violation, lowest pinball loss, and smallest maximum exceedance over rolling 50 trading day windows among the evaluated methods. Robustness checks preserve the same conclusion under strict direct marking, stricter book selection screens, and removal of the VaR floor. The result is also stable across alternative quantile learners, residual recalibration windows, and decay rates. These findings support marking-aware sequential VaR recalibration as a leakage-safe risk control layer for option-book VaR under realistic quote and marking frictions.

2026-04-03T22:45:54Z Tenghan Zhong Keyuan Wu http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17299v1 2026-05-17T07:20:30Z

We study a generalized geometric Brownian motion framework that incorporates both entries of new units and exit mechanisms for the current population, extending earlier stochastic resetting models where these rates are treated as identical. The model captures realistic features observed in many economic observables, which can be explained as market-driven firm entries/exits, worker inflow/outflow, and income growth/loss. This model is not conservative and, despite the asymmetry in the entry and exit rates, we find that the system eventually relaxes to a stationary distribution. Moreover, our analysis reveals three distinct dynamical regimes in the moments of the distribution, arising from the interplay between volatility, drift, entry, and exit rates. We further derive the survival probability and the mean first-passage time associated with the observed variable reaching certain threshold under the competing entry-exit processes. Interestingly, we identify an optimal exit rate that minimizes the mean first-passage time, providing insights into how entry and exit policies can influence the outcome of the system. These results should be useful for understanding the long-run behavior of economic systems in which growth, volatility, entry, and exit jointly shape the evolution of heterogeneous units.

2026-05-17T07:20:30Z 15 pages, 8 figures Suvam Pal Viktor Stojkoski Arnab Pal Trifce Sandev http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17275v1 2026-05-17T05:52:54Z

Accurate forecasting of the Volatility-Covariance Matrix (VCV) is central to regulatory capital adequacy processes such as the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). Traditional econometric models, including GARCH-family and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) approaches, suffer from parametric rigidity, distributional assumptions, and numerical instability under stress, leading to systematic underestimation of tail risk. This paper proposes and validates a novel Hybrid Gaussian Process Regression-Historical Simulation (GPR-HS) framework for estimating Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) across a diversified portfolio of seven major global equity indices. The framework decouples the VCV estimation problem: individual asset volatilities are modelled dynamically using Univariate GPR with a Matern 5/2 kernel, while inter-asset correlations are estimated via stable historical covariance. A key methodological contribution is the Aggressive Noise Initialization (ANI) strategy, which sets the initial White Noise kernel variance equal to the empirical variance of the training returns, ensuring Gram matrix positive-definiteness, regularization, and conservative, regulatory-compliant forecasts. Evaluated using an expanding window forward-chaining cross-validation scheme over June 2020 -June 2025, the GPR-HS framework achieves regulatory compliance in the majority of test splits; including a 100% ES pass rate at the portfolio level, while outperforming the static Historical VaR benchmark in 71.4% of univariate cases by Quadratic Loss and 100% of cases by violation count.

2026-05-17T05:52:54Z Working paper. Replication code available at: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1nrlSqmG10DNerNmEqGIh3EB9CcLWIgH9 Ujjwala Vadrevu http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18397v3 2026-05-17T05:15:14Z

We study optimal payoff choice for an expected utility maximizer under the constraint that their payoff is not allowed to deviate ``too much'' from a given benchmark. We solve this problem when the deviation is assessed via a Bregman-Wasserstein (BW) divergence, generated by a convex function $φ$. Unlike the Wasserstein distance (i.e., when $φ(x)=x^2$) the inherent asymmetry of the BW divergence makes it possible to penalize positive deviations different than negative ones. As a main contribution, we provide the optimal payoff in this setting. Numerical examples illustrate that the choice of $φ$ allow to better align the payoff choice with the objectives of investors.

2024-11-27T14:40:20Z Silvana M. Pesenti Steven Vanduffel Yang Yang Jing Yao http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19983v2 2026-05-17T01:16:17Z

This paper distinguishes between risk resonance and risk diversification relationships in the cryptocurrency market based on the newly developed asymmetric breakpoint approach, and analyzes the risk propagation mechanism among cryptocurrencies under extreme events. In addition, through the lens of node association and network structure, this paper explores the dynamic evolutionary relationship of cryptocurrency risk association before and after the epidemic. In addition, the driving mechanism of the cryptocurrency risk movement is analyzed in a depth with the epidemic indicators. The findings show that the effect of propagation of risk among cryptocurrencies becomes more significant under the influence of the new crown outbreak. At the same time, the increase in the number of confirmed cases exacerbated the risk spillover effect among cryptocurrencies, while the risk resonance effect that exists between the crude oil market and the cryptocurrency market amplified the extent of the outbreak's impact on cryptocurrencies. However, other financial markets are relatively independent of the cryptocurrency market. This study proposes a strategy to deal with the spread of cryptocurrency risks from the perspective of a public health crisis, providing a useful reference basis for improving the regulatory mechanism of cryptocurrencies.

2024-12-28T02:53:29Z This paper has been withdrawn because the current version contains errors in the framing and results that may mislead readers. The authors are preparing a corrected manuscript Wenjie Lan http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16699v1 2026-05-15T23:24:14Z

Capped-usage SaaS products -- LLM subscriptions such as Claude Code and ChatGPT, cloud platforms such as Vercel and Cloudflare Workers, corporate benefit platforms, identity-verification services with liability transfer -- share a structural signature with insurance products: a fixed premium decoupled from realized consumption, stochastic per-user demand with heavy-tailed severity, a non-fungible cap that resets on a fixed schedule, and a portfolio-level exposure that requires reserve adequacy under tail risk. We argue that this is not an analogy. It is the same operational problem actuarial science has been tooled for decades to address, restated with new dependent variables (tokens, bandwidth bytes, function-invocations, gym check-ins) in place of medical claims. This paper proposes a modeling framework for capped-usage SaaS pricing built from frequency-severity decomposition, premium calculation principles, and Monte Carlo reserve adequacy. We map the framework to publicly observable subscription tiers in two domains (LLM services and cloud platforms), ground it in canonical health-insurance economics (Arrow 1963; Pauly 1968; Manning et al. 1987; Brot-Goldberg et al. 2017), and demonstrate divergence from traditional unit economics through a worked example. The contribution is operational rather than theoretical: not a new theorem, but vocabulary and tools currently absent from cs.LG/stat.ML practice.

2026-05-15T23:24:14Z 23 pages, 2 figures, 7 tables. Companion code archived at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20213155 Caio Gomes Magalu http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16448v1 2026-05-15T03:04:50Z

This paper investigates risk measures derived from the expected maximum deficit in a continuous-time framework and develops optimal reserve allocation strategies across multiple lines of business. We formalize the expected maximum deficit and study its associated distortion risk measures. Furthermore, we introduce implicitly bounded risk measures based on the minimal capital required to meet prescribed fixed and proportional risk tolerances, and propose approaches for optimal capital allocation using line-specific distorted expected deficits. Theoretical results established include static coherence and convexity properties, dynamic conditional extensions detailing supermartingale time consistency over a fixed horizon and the evolution of capital requirements across rolling horizons, and exact analytical optimizations of the aggregate minimum reserve.

2026-05-15T03:04:50Z 33 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables Claude Lefevre Pierre Zuyderhoff http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16919v2 2026-05-14T06:27:05Z

We consider the combination of value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) forecasts when a large pool of candidate forecasts is available. Given the limited literature in this area, we implement a variety of new combining methods. In terms of simplistic methods, in addition to the mean, we consider the median and mode. As a complement to the previously proposed performance-based weighted combinations, we use regularisation to reduce overfitting in the presence of many weights. Treating VaR and ES forecasts jointly as interval forecasts allows the application of adapted interval forecast combination methods, including trimmed means and a mixtures approach based on inferred probability distributions. In an empirical study involving 90 forecasting methods, trimmed mean combinations, the mixtures method, and performance-based weighting delivered particularly strong results. However, greater forecasting accuracy resulted for a pool of just six methods, chosen to ensure diversity, with performance-based weighting producing the best overall performance.

2025-08-23T06:45:32Z 34 pages, 10 figures James W. Taylor Chao Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23979v1 2026-05-13T20:54:40Z

Monte-Carlo valuation engines can generate pathwise sensitivities of a derivative value with respect to a high-dimensional vector of model primitives. Hedge ratios with respect to market instruments are then linked to these primitive sensitivities by a pathwise linear relation. Solving this relation independently on every simulated path may be expensive, unstable, and unnecessarily high-dimensional. This paper studies reduced stochastic hedge ratios of the form $φ_j^r=\sum_{q=1}^rξ_j^qX_q$, where the number of solution basis functions is much smaller than the number of Monte-Carlo paths. The hedge-instrument sensitivity tensor is not replaced by its own basis expansion; it is retained through empirical averages over the simulated paths. The basis ansatz alone does not determine the coefficients, so two coefficient criteria are distinguished. The first minimizes the full empirical pathwise residual $\sum_\ell\|A_\ellφ_\ell^r-b_\ell\|_2^2$. The second is a projected moment equation requiring $\langle Aφ^r-b,Y_s\rangle_N=0$ for selected test functions. The special case $Y_s=X_s$ is the usual Galerkin choice; different test functions give a Petrov--Galerkin formulation. The criteria coincide in special cases but differ when the hedge-instrument sensitivities are path-dependent. The paper gives the tensor and matrix forms of both reductions, discusses regularization and conditioning, and records implementation considerations. The constructions are motivated by sensitivity-based margin valuation adjustment and replication-consistent liquidity forecasting, where pathwise primitive sensitivities have to be converted into hedge ratios with respect to market instruments.

2026-05-13T20:54:40Z 23 pages Christian P Fries http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15675v3 2026-05-13T09:02:59Z

I propose a functional on the space of spectral risk measures that quantifies their ``degree of risk aversion''. This quantification formalizes the idea that some risk measures are ``more risk-averse'' than others. I construct the functional using two axioms: a normalization on the space of CVaRs and a linearity axiom. I present two formulas for the functional and discuss several properties and interpretations.

2024-08-28T09:56:27Z 9 pages Minor update E. Ruben van Beesten http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12977v1 2026-05-13T04:15:24Z

Estimating the covariance of asset returns, i.e., the risk model, is a key component of financial portfolio construction and evaluation. Most risk modeling approaches produce a factor model that decomposes the asset variability into two components: the first attributed to a small number of factors that are common among the assets and the second attributed to the idiosyncratic behavior of each asset. Third-party providers typically provide risk models to investors, and while these models are typically of high quality, they may fail to capture important information, e.g., changing market regimes and transient factors. To overcome these limitations, we propose a systematic method based on maximum likelihood estimation to enhance an existing factor model by both refining the given model and adding new statistical factors. Our approach relies only on the observed sequence of realized returns and on the choice of two hyperparameters: the number of additional factors and the half-life parameter that determines the weights assigned to returns in the log-likelihood objective. Importantly, our methodology applies to the situation where asset returns may be missing, making it suitable for typical equity datasets. We demonstrate our approach on the Barra short-term US risk model, a high-quality risk model used in practice, for a universe of US high-capitalization equities. We show that the proposed extension captures structure in the returns that is missed by the original model.

2026-05-13T04:15:24Z Alexandros E. Tzikas Emmanuel J. Candès Trevor Hastie Stephen P. Boyd Mykel J. Kochenderfer Ronald N. Kahn http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23959v1 2026-05-12T01:28:10Z

We introduce When Alpha Disappears, a paired evaluation benchmark for diagnosing decision-time leakage in financial machine-learning backtests. Rather than treating leakage as a binary property, the benchmark estimates protocol-induced inflation by toggling one evaluation convention at a time around a clean $t{+}1$-open reference, while holding the data panel, walk-forward split, model family, horizon, portfolio rule, and cost convention fixed. Across two daily-OHLCV equity panels, six model families, and yearly tests from 2016--2024, we find that inflation is highly selective: centered temporal features and same-day-open execution with post-open daily-bar information cause large and stable increases in both predictive and trading metrics, whereas global normalization, future-informed graph structure, and same-day-close execution are weak in most settings. The benchmark is diagnostic rather than a claim of tradable alpha, and is intended to make evaluation assumptions, failure modes, and protocol fragility directly measurable.

2026-05-12T01:28:10Z 19 pages, including figures, tables, and the appendix Fan Zhang Zhen Li Sijia Peng Yu Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11200v1 2026-05-11T20:08:58Z

Risk governance is not only about identifying and measuring adverse states of the world. It also asks when an institution is entitled to rely on a risk claim. This paper introduces modal epistemic tools for that second layer of QRM. For a risk proposition $p$, $Kp$ denotes assurance-grade endorsement for certification, audit reliance, board sign-off, or regulatory reporting. By contrast, $Bp$ denotes working commitment: a disciplined action-guiding stance under incomplete assurance. The framework distinguishes object-level risk claims from stances toward them. It develops crisp and fuzzy modal semantics for assurance, working commitment, live possibility, non-exclusion, hesitation, and epistemic inconsistency. The central diagnostics are \[ p\wedge\neg Kp \qquad\text{and}\qquad p\wedge\neg Bp, \] which identify cases in which a risk is present but lacks the relevant stance. Thus QRM should model not only hazards and losses, but also evidential incompleteness, model risk, validation gaps, and failures of escalation. Two governance principles motivate the analysis. The Risk Management Principle says that if $p$ is a risk, then the absence of the relevant stance, $p\wedge\neg Mp$, is itself risk-relevant. The Risk Reach Principle says that real and decision-relevant risks should be reachable by the appropriate stance. Their unrestricted combination creates Moorean and Fitch-style collapse pressure: treating $p\wedge\neg Kp$ or $p\wedge\neg Bp$ as ordinary targets of the same stance whose absence they record undermines the diagnostic. The response is architectural. Object-level risk claims should be separated from meta-level epistemic diagnostics. The latter should be governed through an audit layer that records and controls epistemic gaps. This preserves action and precaution without collapsing risk governance into institutional omniscience.

2026-05-11T20:08:58Z Hirbod Assa