https://arxiv.org/api/tKf8RNK3ssCyNSBHhw7+bB2ZuJU 2026-07-22T21:32:26Z 2985 120 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07575v1 2026-05-26T18:02:45Z

Regulatory stress testing frameworks, including the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), require robust Stressed Value-at-Risk (SVaR) estimation under forward-looking macroeconomic scenarios. Traditional parametric approaches often exhibit numerical instability under extreme shocks, reducing the reliability of capital projections. This paper extends the Hybrid Gaussian Process Regression Historical Simulation (GPR-HS) framework of Vadrevu (2026) to forward-looking stress scenarios, demonstrating stability across three regimes: West Asia War, Climate Risk, and AI Bubble/Regulation. A key contribution is the Scenario-Averaged Covariance Stabilization (SACS) framework, which constructs stress covariance as a weighted aggregation of historical crisis regimes, providing stable and interpretable dependence structures. Stressed return paths are generated over a 252-day horizon using deterministic drift and stochastic residuals, while volatility is modeled via Gaussian Process Regression with Aggressive Noise Initialization (ANI). The framework exhibits consistent convergence across all assets and scenarios. SVaR ranges from -2.1020% to -2.2231%, with the coherence property |SES| > |SVaR| preserved. The results support GPR-HS with SACS as a stable and regulator-aligned approach for forward-looking SVaR and SES estimation in CCAR and ICAAP applications.

2026-05-26T18:02:45Z 15 pages, 3 figures. Extension of a hybrid GPR-HS framework to forward-looking stress testing with scenario-based SVaR and covariance stabilization (SACS) Ujjwala Vadrevu http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05676v3 2026-05-26T13:48:01Z

We study the problem of hedging unit linked life insurance policies whose benefits depend on an investment fund that incorporates environmental criteria in its selection process. Offering these products poses two key challenges: constructing a green investment fund and developing a hedging strategy for policies written on that fund. We address these two problems separately. First, we design a portfolio selection rule driven by firms' carbon intensity that endogenously selects assets and avoids ad hoc pre-screens based on ESG scores. The effectiveness of our new portfolio selection method is tested using real market data. Second, we consider an insurance company issuing unit linked policies written on this fund. Such contracts are exposed to market, carbon, and mortality risk, which the insurance company seeks to hedge. Due to market incompleteness, we address the hedging problem via a quadratic approach aimed at minimizing the variance of the hedging costs. Finally, we also make a numerical analysis to assess the performance of the hedging strategy. For our simulation study, we use an efficient weak second-order scheme that allows for variance reduction.

2025-09-06T10:55:09Z 40 pages Katia Colaneri Alessandra Cretarola Edoardo Lombardo Daniele Mancinelli http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26508v1 2026-05-26T03:47:58Z

We propose a foundational runtime actuarial layer for autonomous AI agents in which every side-effect-bearing action carries a time-consistent, counterfactual risk toll computed against a contractually fixed safe default, inside an explicit underwriting boundary. The framework treats per-action insurance as the primary unit of analysis and replaces post-hoc annual liability cover with a pre-action transaction layer. The paper establishes four structural results: (i) a well-defined counterfactual toll under a chosen safe-default mapping and continuation policy, with explicit non-uniqueness; (ii) a no-splitting property within an underwriting boundary that telescopes path-decomposed actions into a boundary potential, with a corollary tying gaming-resistance to boundary design; (iii) an irreversible-authority premium, split into a strictly positive action-level component and an if-and-only-if characterisation of the set-level robust capital increase; and (iv) a conservative runtime gating theorem that translates high-probability toll envelopes into an executed-action budget guarantee. The result is the mathematical base layer for a broader program: an empirical companion instantiates the runtime through an Actuarial Action Interface and authority-frontier experiments; a mechanism-design companion studies strategic operator incentives and cross-boundary aggregation; and a dynamic-underwriting companion studies experience rating and audit-replay calibration. The present paper states the primitive contract, the toll identity, the within-boundary no-arbitrage result, and the budget guarantee on which those later layers depend.

2026-05-26T03:47:58Z 10 pages. Foundational paper of a multi-paper program on actuarial runtime for autonomous AI agents; previously posted on SSRN (id 6761960). Empirical companion: arXiv:2605.25632. Proof companions included as ancillary files Hao-Hsuan Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25766v1 2026-05-25T12:19:02Z

The classical tail dependence coefficient (TDC) may fail to capture non-exchangeable features of bivariate tail dependence since it evaluates the underlying copula only along the diagonal. To address this limitation, several measures of strongest manifestation of tail dependence have been proposed in the bivariate case, including a measure based on the tail copula of the underlying bivariate copula. This paper introduces and investigates the multivariate maximal tail concordance measure (MTCM) which extends the bivariate measure to the multivariate case. The MTCM quantifies the largest tail mass over lower hyperrectangles of common unit volume, while the associated maximizer identifies the direction of maximal tail probability. We establish fundamental properties of the MTCM in the multivariate case, including existence of an optimal direction. We also derive analytical representations for several important model classes. Closed-form expressions are further obtained for survival Marshall-Olkin copulas, Archimax and nested Archimedean copulas with regularly varying Archimedean generators. An application to trivariate annual sea-level maxima in England shows that the MTCM can reveal off-diagonal stress directions and substantial differences in the underlying extremal dependence not detected by likelihood- or TDC-based comparisons.

2026-05-25T12:19:02Z Takaaki Koike Marius Hofert Haruki Tsunekawa http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25632v1 2026-05-25T09:31:48Z

Autonomous AI agents increasingly issue side-effect-bearing actions: database mutations, refunds, payments, external commitments. We propose the Actuarial Action Interface (AAI), a deterministic runtime contract that prices each such action against a contractually fixed safe default under a time-consistent risk mapping, and gates execution against a per-boundary reserve capital budget. We then develop the Authority Frontier, an evaluation primitive measuring how much autonomous authority the runtime releases at each level of reserve capital. The framework provides (i) a deterministic quote-bind-commit protocol with toll-bounded capability tokens; (ii) a universal seven-class action taxonomy mapping heterogeneous tool calls to comparable authority units; (iii) replay determinism and pathwise reserve coverage under alpha-spending; (iv) cross-domain normalization via full reserve demand C_full and capital metrics Capital@k. We instantiate AAI across four agentic environments (database mutation, customer-service refund, and the public tau-bench retail and airline tool-use traces) and report a live Postgres panel in which three Azure-hosted models propose actions through the same contract. The frontier exhibits a common low-reserve refusal and intermediate-release pattern across domains, with saturation only where the budget grid reaches full reserve demand; required reserve capital varies by 22x (Capital@50 from 289 to 6457). The framework does not force domains into the same shape; it surfaces each domain's actuarial geometry. In the live panel the contract prevents realized loss across all three models at low budget while differing in underwriting persistence under denial: model identity is an actuarial underwriting variable. The contribution is a benchmark-ready evaluation framework for runtime actuarial control of autonomous-agent side effects.

2026-05-25T09:31:48Z 35 pages, 4 figures, 11 tables. Companion paper on the mathematical foundations: SSRN 6761960 Hao-Hsuan Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25559v1 2026-05-25T08:13:38Z

Modeling the dependence between multiple risk types is a central challenge in contemporary insurance risk management. The standard approaches, Lévy copulas and zero-mixed models, often face practical difficulties in simulation and parameter calibration. In this paper, we introduce the Comb-Bernoulli model, a novel framework for capturing dependence between sparse time series of insurance risks, bridging the benefits of the two standard approaches. The (traditional) copula structure of the proposed model enables tractable: i) simulation, ii) likelihood evaluation, and iii) estimation of dependence parameters. We present the general properties of the model and analyze in detail the Gaussian copula case with lognormal marginals. Moreover, we illustrate an application using the Danish fire insurance dataset, highlighting both the modeling strengths and numerical efficiency of our approach in real-world risk management.

2026-05-25T08:13:38Z Roberto Baviera Pietro Manzoni Michele Domenico Massaria http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22892v2 2026-05-25T06:27:59Z

Modelling claim frequency and severity for non-life insurance pricing predominantly relies on generalised linear models, with gradient-boosted machines as the leading machine learning alternative. Tabular foundation models (TFMs) present a fundamentally different inference paradigm. By pre-training on large collections of synthetic datasets, TFMs enable inference on new data through in-context learning, without any dataset-specific fitting or hyperparameter tuning. This paper presents a first empirical evaluation of TabPFN for motor insurance pricing, benchmarking it against GLM and XGBoost on two publicly available MTPL datasets. Our results show that TabPFN does not consistently outperform established baselines, exhibits substantially longer inference times, and is sensitive to the size of the in-context training set. While tabular foundation models represent a promising direction, particularly in data-scarce settings, their current performance does not offer a viable replacement for established actuarial methods.

2026-05-21T13:59:06Z Bruno Deprez Wouter Verbeke Tim Verdonck http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25450v1 2026-05-25T06:01:01Z

This paper examines the valuation and hedging of standard equity protection swap (EPS) products proposed by Xu et al.. To account for financial crises and counterparty default risk, we develop pricing frameworks based on Merton's jump-diffusion model and Szimayer's independent random time default model, under which closed-form valuation formulas and put-call parity relations for European options are derived. Hedging strategies for EPS products are analysed under jump and default risks. While static hedging remains effective in the absence of default, counterparty default risk leads to residual losses that cannot be fully hedged. These losses are quantified and used to define default-adjusted initial premiums under both Black-Scholes and jump-diffusion settings. Numerical results illustrate the effects of jump characteristics and default intensity on hedging costs and premiums, highlighting the importance of incorporating crisis and credit risks in EPS pricing and risk management.

2026-05-25T06:01:01Z Marek Rutkowski Huansang Xu http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18029v2 2026-05-25T01:32:59Z

Systemic risk measures play a crucial role in analyzing individual losses conditional on extreme system-wide disasters. In this paper, we provide a unified asymptotic treatment for systemic risk measures. First, we classify them into two families of Value-at-Risk- (VaR-) and expectile-based systemic risk measures. While VaR-based risk measures have been extensively studied, in the latter family, we propose two new systemic risk measures named the Individual Conditional Expectile (ICE) and the Systemic Individual Conditional Expectile (SICE), as alternatives to Marginal Expected Shortfall (MES) and Systemic Expected Shortfall (SES). Second, to characterize general mutually dependent and heavy-tailed risks, we consider a multivariate loss system following a multivariate Sarmanov distribution with common marginal distributions exhibiting second-order regular variation. Third, within this setting, we provide second-order asymptotic results for both families of systemic risk measures. These results extend standard first-order asymptotics and allow for more accurate tail approximations. Through numerical and analytical examples, we demonstrate the superiority of second-order asymptotics in accurately assessing systemic risk. We further conduct a comprehensive comparison between expectile-based and VaR-based systemic risk measures. The results indicate that expectile-based measures often yield higher asymptotic accuracy than VaR-based ones, emphasizing the former's potential advantages in reporting extreme events and tail risk. As a financial application, we use the asymptotic treatment to discuss the diversification benefits associated with various risk measures. Finally, we extend and obtain the second-order asymptotic formulas for generalized-quantile-based systemic risk measures with power functions.

2024-04-27T23:42:19Z Keywords: Asymptotic approximation; Systemic risk; Expectile; Sarmanov distribution; Second-order regular variation; Diversification benefit Bingzhen Geng Yang Liu Yimiao Zhao http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24514v1 2026-05-23T10:56:31Z

Return panels, covariances, and large feature matrices evolve one observation or one entry at a time, yet downstream models require an up-to-date low-rank factorization $A_t \approx U_t Σ_t V_t^\top$ on every tick -- a regime where full SVD is prohibitive and existing alternatives sacrifice either singular vectors, singular values, or long-horizon stability. We present a practical, metric-driven study of Brand-style incremental SVD, built around a unified engine that handles row appends, column appends, rank-1 entry updates, and metrics tracking within a single framework, with two core contributions. For rank-1 entry updates, we derive an explicit projection-based rule $U'Σ'(V')^\top = P_U(\widehat{A} + δ\,e_ie_j^\top)P_V$ that keeps rank fixed while discarding only the out-of-subspace remainder in a quantifiable way, turning Brand's rank-suppression heuristic into an operational scheme. We then treat refresh scheduling as a first-class design axis, systematically comparing periodic, error-threshold, angle-threshold, and adaptive-rank policies on the accuracy-latency frontier. A unified framework tracks error ratios, principal angles, explained variance, and per-update runtime on long synthetic streams and a multi-asset ETF factor model for covariance and portfolio-risk estimation. With a sensible rank and refresh cadence, incremental SVD matches full-SVD accuracy within a few percent at a fraction of the cost, scaling to high-frequency regimes where batch SVDs are infeasible.

2026-05-23T10:56:31Z Stilyan Staykov http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16401v2 2026-05-21T15:30:30Z

We study Stackelberg Equilibria (Bowley optima) in a monopolistic centralized sequential-move insurance market, with a profit-maximizing insurer who sets premia using a distortion premium principle, and a single policyholder who seeks to minimize a distortion risk measure. We show that equilibria are characterized as follows: In equilibrium, the optimal indemnity function exhibits a layer-type structure, providing full insurance over any loss layer on which the policyholder is more pessimistic than the insurer's pricing functional about tail losses; and no insurance coverage over loss layers on which the policyholder is less pessimistic than the insurer's pricing functional about tail losses. In equilibrium, the optimal pricing distortion function is determined by the policyholder's degree of risk aversion, whereby prices never exceed the policyholder's marginal willingness to insure tail losses. Moreover, we show that both the insurance coverage and the insurer's expected profit increase with the policyholder's degree of risk aversion. Additionally, and echoing recent work in the literature, we show that equilibrium contracts are Pareto efficient, but they do not induce a welfare gain to the policyholder. Conversely, any Pareto-optimal contract that leaves no welfare gain to the policyholder can be obtained as an equilibrium contract. Finally, we consider a few examples of interest that recover some existing results in the literature as special cases of our analysis.

2026-02-18T12:21:18Z Maria Andraos Mario Ghossoub Bin Li Benxuan Shi 10.1017/asb.2026.10106 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21696v1 2026-05-20T19:56:30Z

This paper studies empirical deep hedging for S&P 500 index options under a local downside-shortfall reward. It moves beyond performance comparison by asking what the learned hedge does, when it fails, and whether it can be made auditable. TD3 agents are compared with a daily-updated Black-Scholes delta hedge on the same option episodes. In walk-forward tests from 2015 to 2023, the agents usually learn a systematic delta haircut relative to Black-Scholes. The correction is explained by spot-implied-volatility co-movement and often improves accumulated reward and terminal downside variance, but it is regime-fragile: 2022 exposes losses in adverse daily states, while 2023 shows that underhedging can raise ordinary variance when option P&L is spot-dominated and the volatility channel is unusually weak. Symbolic regression distills the neural policies into compact formulas that can be traded out of sample; these formulas preserve much of the reward, downside-variance, and CVaR advantage over Black-Scholes, and sometimes sharpen it, but inherit the same fragility in difficult regimes.

2026-05-20T19:56:30Z 34 pages, 11 figures, 18 tables. Code and replication package: https://github.com/Kirill-ZG/Interpretable-Empirical-Deep-Hedging Kirill Zernikov New Economic School http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18687v4 2026-05-19T13:40:38Z

We introduce set risk measures (SRMs), real-valued maps defined on the family of non-empty closed bounded sets of essentially bounded random variables. SRMs extend traditional scalar risk measures by assigning a single capital requirement to an entire set of positions. We develop an axiomatic framework for SRMs, adapting classical properties such as monotonicity, translation invariance, convexity, and positive homogeneity to set arithmetic. The main technical contribution is a dual representation of convex SRMs through the \strict{} topology and regular $τ$-additive unit-mass measures. We also characterize worst-case SRMs and present examples related to systemic risk, Knightian uncertainty, and preference representations.

2024-07-26T12:08:58Z Marcelo Righi Eduardo Horta Marlon Moresco http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13562v2 2026-05-18T20:31:06Z

The classic semi-Markov disability model is expanded with individual and collective health claims to improve its explanatory and predictive power -- in particular in the context of group experience rating. The inclusion of collective health claims leads to a computationally challenging many-body problem. By adopting a mean-field approach, this many-body problem can be approximated by a non-linear one-body problem, which in turn leads to a transparent pricing method for disability coverages based on a lower-dimensional system of non-linear forward integro-differential equations. In a practice-oriented simulation study, the mean-field approximation clearly stands its ground in comparison to naïve Monte Carlo methods.

2025-12-15T17:18:15Z Christian Furrer Philipp C. Hornung http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18049v1 2026-05-18T08:37:11Z

The aggregation of individual risks in large credit and insurance portfolios is guided by diversification and the law of large numbers, which formalizes the convergence of sample averages to their means. At the same time, regulatory capital requirements and insurance premia are designed to provide a capital buffer or risk margin above the mean. The resulting excess, given by the difference between the nonlinear valuation of the aggregate loss and the corresponding mean, reflects the idea of protection against unexpected losses in the sense of banking and insurance regulation. This paper studies the asymptotic behaviour of this excess for large weighted portfolios. The main result shows that, for monotone cash-additive risk measures on Banach-lattice-valued Orlicz spaces, convergence along weighted averages satisfying a weak law of large numbers together with a uniform integrability condition is equivalent to scalar continuity at the origin. If the risk measure is positively homogeneous, this continuity condition is automatically satisfied, and we prove that the unexpected losses of large weighted portfolios are of order $o(n\overlineλ_n)$, where $\overlineλ_n$ denotes the average weight assigned to the first $n$ random variables. We establish analogous asymptotic results for Choquet insurance premia. Finally, we derive risk-ratio limits that quantify the potential underestimation arising when diversified portfolios are compared with co-monotonic alternatives.

2026-05-18T08:37:11Z Max Nendel