https://arxiv.org/api/S5zewMNbXw5K4039eun/QcebF30 2026-07-22T20:42:02Z 2985 105 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04576v1 2026-06-03T08:11:45Z

Learning Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) is important for managing financial risks effectively. Existing approaches with limited parameters are vulnerable to model misspecification in the era of big data. To address this limitation, we propose a large tail risk model, the retrieval-enhanced self-grouping autoencoder (ReSGA), which is designed with millions of parameters to exploit the rich cross-sectional dependence and long-term temporal dynamics of assets using their characteristics. Applied to monthly US equity returns from 1926 to 2023 with 153 firm characteristics, ReSGA outperforms twelve econometric and machine learning competitors in terms of out-of-sample loss and statistical backtesting. In addition, its forecast advantages can translate into significant economic gains from long-short decile portfolios that are constructed by a new size-enhanced left-side momentum strategy. To clarify the role of complexity, we further conduct a systematic scaling analysis and demonstrate that improvements in joint VaR-ES forecasting are primarily driven by data complexity rather than model complexity. Finally, our analyses of group-importance and transfer-learning exhibit the interpretability and cross-market generalizability of ReSGA.

2026-06-03T08:11:45Z Yichi Zhang Ke Zhu Zhoufan Zhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04235v1 2026-06-02T21:34:33Z

Collateral allocation for uncleared derivatives is a legally constrained and operationally discrete optimization problem. Institutions must satisfy margin requirements while respecting CSA eligibility rules, valuation percentages, rounding, transfer thresholds, concentration limits, custody conditions, inventory, and VM, IM, or IA side constraints. This manuscript develops CR-HO-QAOA, a certified higher-order quantum candidate-generation framework for margin- and CSA-aware collateral allocation. The framework is adapter-first: official SIMM, proxy SIMM, legacy IA, VM-only, RQV, or hybrid margin sources are normalized into a common MarginRequirement, so the optimizer does not calculate or replace official SIMM. Given the requirement, CSA terms, and inventory, the optimizer builds a bounded active neighborhood of pledge, recall, substitution, batch, and slack actions. These actions define a higher-order binary model whose hyperedges capture concentration pressure, custody batches, substitution tickets, chunky lots, liquidity effects, overshoot, and side-specific requirements. The quantum layer maps hyperedges into a Pauli-Z cost Hamiltonian and uses collateral-specific feasible-subspace mixers to preserve one-hot choices, movement budgets, side assignments, and substitution structure. Candidates are decoded, repaired if needed, evaluated under an eight-term production objective, and certified by a deterministic CP-SAT master solver before any recommendation is reported. Synthetic benchmarks show that higher-order, constraint-preserving candidate generation can improve certified sample quality relative to QUBO-style and generic-mixer baselines, while CP-SAT remains the feasibility and governance arbiter. These results are synthetic workflow-validation evidence only, not evidence of hardware quantum advantage or production bank savings.

2026-06-02T21:34:33Z 30 pages Tao Jin Stuart Florescu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03777v1 2026-06-02T15:29:43Z

AI losses that arise through an insured organization's generative or agentic AI system require state reconstruction, not merely event reconstruction, because the relevant state changes as the system reasons, retrieves, calls tools, and acts. The relevant question is not only what loss occurred, but what the system was allowed to do, what it actually did, and whether that reconstructed loss can support insurance claim recovery. This paper addresses losses in which the insured's AI system is in the causal chain, including externally triggered failures such as prompt injection, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) poisoning, malicious tool output, credential misuse, and data poisoning. Specifically, this paper introduces CER, a use-case-level diagnostic for AI residual risk transfer. C (control boundary) asks whether the system had an enforceable operating envelope. E (evidence reconstruction) asks whether the system state and causal chain can be reconstructed from retained artifacts. R (insurance response) asks whether the reconstructed loss is insured: whether insurance coverage is available in the market and placed for the insured, together with the proof needed to support insurance claim recovery. The paper makes three contributions: it defines the AI-specific reconstruction problem, operationalizes that problem through CER, and specifies claim-grade evidence for AI reconstruction. Public examples include the reported PocketOS and Replit agentic database-deletion incidents and Moffatt v. Air Canada as an adjudicated output/reliance case. Keywords: AI systems; CER framework; residual risk transfer; agentic AI; generative AI; AI insurance; evidence reconstruction.

2026-06-02T15:29:43Z Alex Leung Rex Zhang Kentaroh Toyoda SiewMei Loh http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19701v2 2026-06-02T13:16:56Z

In this paper, we study an optimal dividend and capital-injection problem in a Cramér--Lundberg model where claim arrivals follow a Hawkes process, capturing clustering effects often observed in insurance portfolios. We establish key analytical properties of the value function and characterise the optimal capital-injection strategy through an explicit threshold. We also show that the value function is the unique viscosity solution of the associated HJB variational inequality. For numerical purposes, we first compute a benchmark solution via a monotone finite-difference scheme with Howard's policy iteration. We then develop a reinforcement learning approach based on policy-gradient and actor-critic methods. The learned strategies closely match the PDE benchmark and remain stable across initial conditions. The results highlight the relevance of policy-gradient techniques for dividend optimisation under self-exciting claim dynamics and point toward scalable methods for higher-dimensional extensions.

2025-11-24T21:09:10Z Paulin Aubert Etienne Chevalier Vathana Ly Vath http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03267v2 2026-06-01T11:59:12Z

In financial and actuarial research, distortion and Haezendonck-Goovaerts risk measures are attractive due to their strong properties. They have so far been treated separately. In this paper, following a suggestion by Goovaerts, Linders, Van Weert, and Tank, we introduce and study a new class of risk measure that encompasses the distortion and Haezendonck-Goovaerts risk measures, aptly called the distortion Haezendonck-Goovaerts risk measures. They will be defined on a larger space than the space of bounded risks. We provide situations where these new risk measures are coherent, and explore their risk theoretic properties.

2025-12-02T22:17:08Z Aline Goulard Karl Grosse-Erdmann http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09967v2 2026-05-31T22:11:32Z

We study a monopolistic insurance market with hidden information, where the agent's type $θ$ is private information that is unobservable to the insurer, and it is drawn from a continuum of types. The hidden type affects both the loss distribution and the risk attitude of the agent. Within this framework, we show that a menu of contracts is incentive efficient if it maximizes social welfare function, subject to incentive compatibility and individual rationality constraints. This holds for general utility functionals. In the special case of Yaari Dual Utility, we provide two partial converse statements to this result, and we give a semi-explicit characterization of optimal solutions to the social welfare maximization problem. We do this under two different settings: (i) the first assumes that types are ordered in a way such that larger values of $θ$ correspond to more risk-averse types who face stochastically larger losses; whereas (ii) the second assumes that larger values of $θ$ correspond to less risk-averse types who face stochastically larger losses. In both settings, the structure of optimal menus of contracts depends on the level of the social welfare weight, and we examine several properties thereof.

2026-02-10T16:55:52Z Maria Andraos Mario Ghossoub http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18118v3 2026-05-31T05:56:56Z

Can contagion components be identified in aggregated default counts when default probabilities fluctuate with the economic environment? We study this question as an identifiability problem for coarse-grained default-count distributions. Three dependence mechanisms are compared: cumulative contagion in the Davis--Lo model, threshold-type contagion in the Torri model, and common-factor dependence in the Vasicek model. Under an i.i.d. specification, the Vasicek model gives the best overall fit, indicating that a smooth mixture induced by environmental fluctuations can reproduce much of the observed annual default clustering. We then introduce a hierarchical specification in which the baseline default probability varies across years. This extension separates cross-year environmental fluctuations from within-year contagion. Most of the variance of annual default counts is explained by fluctuations in default conditions. The remaining component, however, depends on the contagion mechanism. Threshold-type contagion is largely absorbed into environmental heterogeneity, whereas cumulative contagion leaves a small but persistent signature in both variance decomposition and tail behavior. These results clarify when contagion remains identifiable after aggregation and when it becomes indistinguishable from environmental fluctuations.

2026-04-20T11:37:13Z 46 pages,11 figures Shintaro Mori http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03391v4 2026-05-30T16:42:05Z

This paper proposes a unified adaptive portfolio-management framework that combines factor-based view generation, Black-Litterman (BL) posterior estimation, EWMA covariance estimation, and mean-variance optimization. The key mechanism is a dynamic sliding window that adjusts the estimation horizon according to realized portfolio volatility, thereby updating factor estimates, BL posterior expected returns, and portfolio weights over time. In a ten-year empirical study of the top 100 market-capitalization constituents of the S&P 500 with turnover transaction costs, the proposed method outperforms dynamic mean-variance optimization without BL views and provides stronger downside risk control, while its relative performance remains benchmark-dependent.

2023-07-07T05:30:05Z 6 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables Chi-Lin Li Chung-Han Hsieh http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07526v3 2026-05-29T20:49:04Z

We analyze a continuous-time preemption game with shared catastrophic externalities. When the cost of catastrophe is embedded in both players' payoffs, the risk term cancels out in the equilibrium indifference condition. This creates a "suicide region" where competitive pressures force rational agents to deploy despite negative risk-adjusted net present values. We apply this framework to the race for artificial general intelligence (AGI). We show that this suicide region widens as the cost of systemic ruin grows: higher catastrophic risk does not deter the race but instead enlarges the set of conditions under which rational actors deploy despite negative social value. We characterize the resulting welfare distortion against a social planner's benchmark and demonstrate how two complementary mechanisms - private liability and prize-sharing - can close the suicide region. Private liability raises the cost of unsafe deployment while prize-sharing reduces the strategic imperative to deploy first. "Warning shots" (sub-existential disasters) will fail to deter AGI acceleration, as the winner-takes-all nature of the race remains intact.

2025-12-08T13:00:23Z 41 pages, 1 figure David Tan http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01157v2 2026-05-29T20:34:17Z

Risk forecasts in financial regulation and internal management are calculated through historical data. The unknown structural changes of financial data pose a substantial challenge in selecting an appropriate look-back window for risk modeling and forecasting. We develop a data-driven online learning method, called the bootstrap-based adaptive window selection (BAWS), that adaptively determines the window size in a sequential manner. A central component of BAWS is to compare the realized scores against a data-dependent threshold based on the bootstrap method. We provide an asymptotic justification for the bootstrap threshold, covering non-smooth scores such as the VaR check loss and the joint VaR--ES score, with an extension to stationary weakly dependent data via the moving block bootstrap. A single-break analysis further shows that BAWS rejects overlong windows crossing sufficiently large breaks. The proposed method is applicable to the forecasting of risk measures that are elicitable individually or jointly, such as the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and the pair of VaR and the corresponding Expected Shortfall. Through simulation studies and an empirical analysis, we demonstrate that BAWS often improves upon the standard rolling window approach and the recently developed method of stability-based adaptive window selection, especially when there are structural changes in the data-generating process.

2026-03-01T15:42:52Z Yinhuan Li Chenxin Lyu Ruodu Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30643v1 2026-05-28T22:56:12Z

Hit ratio is a common service metric for electronic corporate bond market making, but raw hit-ratio targets can be economically misleading when client flow has heterogeneous adverse-selection content. This paper extends a stochastic-control framework for OTC bond RFQ market making with hit-ratio constraints by replacing raw hit ratio with a residual-quality-adjusted hit ratio. The key modelling distinction is that adverse post-trade markouts are first decomposed into observable credit factors, carry/rolldown, issuer-relative-value effects, index or ETF demand effects, and residual adverse selection. Only the residual component is treated as client-flow toxicity. The resulting control problem remains tractable: after dualizing the quality-hit-ratio penalty, the HJB retains separable Hamiltonians, and the dual variable is the solution of an exact one-dimensional nonlinear fixed point for each targeted tier. Under a quadratic value-function approximation, optimal quotes decompose into a riskless spread, inventory skew, credit-alpha skew, residual-toxicity charge, and quality-hit-ratio subsidy. Synthetic multi-bond simulations with nonlinear dual solves illustrate that raw hit-ratio targeting can subsidize residual-toxic flow, while residual-quality targeting reallocates service toward low-residual-toxicity flow and improves the attained service/economics frontier. A final reduced-form extension studies inventory-recycling value through risk-aware style-aligned client-flow warehousing. Sweep or portfolio-trade opportunities fill randomly, and participation is sized using the same quadratic value approximation as the RFQ quoting problem. A passive/index-demand experiment is reported in the appendix as a special case of forecastable client flow. The numerical evidence is synthetic and mechanism-oriented; no proprietary RFQ data are used.

2026-05-28T22:56:12Z Bouna Niang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30068v1 2026-05-28T15:15:30Z

We investigate integration by parts (IBP) formulae for stochastic Volterra equations and we establish the smoothing effect of the expectation. Due to the inherent path-dependent dynamics of this class of processes, standard Bismut--Elworthy--Li (BEL) formulae and lifting procedures fail to produce representations for directional derivatives with respect to the initial curve. We exhibit a new type of fractional IBP for these derivatives which, by means of the Riemann--Liouville fractional derivative, interpolates between the standard chain rule and a pure BEL formula with Cameron--Martin path directions. Our assumptions describe precisely the trade-off between the direction's and the test function's regularities. Crucially, we reveal that more roughness leads to more smoothing: for a power-law kernel with Hurst parameter $H\in(0,1/2)$, we show that the expectation is differentiable along constant directions provided that the test function has Hölder continuity $β>2H$. The proof of the formula relies on a careful analysis of the conditional expectation's temporal regularity and on the well-posedness of its Riemann--Liouville derivative. We complement these results with a BEL formula along all square integrable directions whenever the noise is additive, a second order BEL formula and an application to forward and rough volatility models. In the latter case, the derivative is interpreted as the sensitivity with respect to the whole initial forward variance curve.

2026-05-28T15:15:30Z 39 pages Alexandre Pannier http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28327v2 2026-05-28T12:19:33Z

Traditional insurance pricing relies on risk-based principles that ensure actuarial fairness and solvency but do not explicitly account for policyholders' price sensitivity. We formulate insurance pricing as a decision-making problem and study it using tools from off-policy evaluation and stochastic control. We propose a kernelized inverse propensity score estimator that exploits local structure in the action space and yields variance reduction compared to the classical inverse propensity score estimator. Building on these value estimates, we investigate policy optimization and present two practical approaches for computing optimal pricing rules: an interpretable data-shared Lasso formulation and a flexible policy parameterization based on neural networks. Using a controlled synthetic travel insurance environment, we empirically confirm the theoretical results and show that neural networks outperform existing techniques for policy optimization.

2026-05-27T11:27:32Z Sascha Günther Dimitri Semenovich Mario V. Wüthrich http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29413v1 2026-05-28T06:02:21Z

This paper compares a series of contemporary portfolio construction approaches by employing ten U.S. stocks (TSLA, WMT, BAC, GS, LLY, MRK, GOOG, META, AAPL and XOM) in a time frame from September 2023 to December 2025. The paper explores both basic mean-variance optimization, constrained optimization, Fama French five factor regression modeling, Monte Carlo simulation, and the Black-Litterman model to determine how constraints to a solution, risk factors to a strategy, simulated approximations, and specific market views may all impact the outcome of portfolio allocation, performance and stability. Overall, the results show that standard optimization may result in highly concentrated portfolios, while constrained optimization leads to changes in portfolio allocations by altering the efficient frontier, five factor regression models suggest that a basic investment style of defensive large value and profitability exposure, Monte Carlo approximation is a viable technique to arrive at mean-variance optimal portfolios provided the simulations are high enough especially under a box constraint, the Black Litterman portfolio approach produces more economically intuitive allocations and greater stability compared to standard mean-variance optimization as the approach balances equilibrium returns with investor views.

2026-05-28T06:02:21Z Ajay Kumar Verma Shravya Barkam http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28647v1 2026-05-27T15:52:07Z

It is well known that LLM guardrails and trained persona dynamics can produce a reality gap: the distance between the world a LLM is permitted or shaped to describe, and the world in which users must act. Here we argue that actively generating reality gaps is in fact unethical because it knowingly shifts epistemic risk back to the uninformed user -- this is reality laundering. This can potentially cause harm when operationalised at scale. The risk is sharpest in high-exposure advice contexts, where users seek orientation rather than a bounded, externally checkable task. Guardrails naively appear ethically necessary when they claim to prevent direct harm, but often become suspect when they suppress truthful perception and launder uncomfortable mechanisms into acceptable abstractions. Basel-style financial regulation, B-BBEE-style compliance, Societe Generale, and the London Whale show how formal safety systems can become legible, gameable, and performative while real exposure migrates elsewhere. The same pattern can appear in LLMs as moral compliance: safe language, distorted reality. We therefore distinguish refusing harm, from refusing reality; and then argue for top-down causal requirements specification at the task level rather than bottom-up moral correction at the response or sandbox level. Persona dynamics matter because the assistant interface is not neutral; it shapes how uncertainty, conflict, authority, and risk are staged. The conclusion is that so-called ``ethical AI'' becomes substantively unethical when it substitutes institutional reassurance for contact with reality.

2026-05-27T15:52:07Z 8 pages Tim Gebbie Stewart Gebbie