https://arxiv.org/api/VGoTa+wc5f2knormRcHyIOLNbkQ2026-07-18T21:54:06Z2979015http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04103v3Governing Generative AI Across Financial Institutions: A Framework for Generative AI Risk Control2026-07-16T01:47:28ZGenerative artificial intelligence is moving from general-purpose experimentation toward specialized applications across banking, capital markets, insurance, payments, and wealth management. Its main contribution is not limited to conversational interfaces. Modern generative systems can synthesize large document collections, extract information from unstructured data, generate software and analytical code, create scenario narratives, support research workflows, and coordinate multi-step tasks. These capabilities make generative AI especially relevant to finance, where decisions often depend on combining quantitative data with contracts, policies,filings, news, customer communications, and expert judgment. This paper presents an application-oriented view of generative AI in finance. It organizes potential uses around five capability patterns, including knowledge synthesis, content generation, analytical assistance, interaction, and workflow orchestration, and maps them to major financia functions. Representative applications include investment research, customer service, lending support, fraud investigation, financial reporting, operations automation, software development, and personalized financial guidance. The paper also discusses common technical architectures, such as retrieval-augmented generation, tool-using assistants, multimodal models, and agentic workflows, and identifies practical factors that shape business value. The resulting landscape provides a foundation for researchers and practitioners seeking to understand where generative AI may produce the greatest operational and analytical impact in financial services2026-07-05T03:46:47ZDennis MaoAlessandra LinYixin KangYiqing Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14373v1A Noise-Robust Elicit-to-Optimize Framework for Distortion Riskmetrics via Inverse Reinforcement Learning2026-07-15T21:22:50ZWe propose a noise-robust elicit-to-optimize framework that integrates inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) and reinforcement learning (RL) for eliciting agents' risk preferences and optimizing policies under a broad class of risk objectives characterized by distortion riskmetrics. On the elicitation side, we propose an adaptive Bayesian IRL method that infers agents' latent risk objectives from their noisy observed decisions, explicitly allowing agents to take stochastic and suboptimal actions. We establish the existence of a finite set of distinguishing questions that identifies the preferred distortion riskmetric within the candidate class and prove that the convergence rate of the algorithm is of order $O(\exp(-cm+O(\sqrt{m\log m})))$ under general settings, where $c>0$ is a constant and $m$ denotes the number of algorithm iterations. On the optimization side, we develop a model-free RL algorithm for optimizing policies under conditional distortion riskmetrics. By representing the objective as an integral of the conditional cost quantile function with respect to the distortion function, the method unifies distortion-riskmetric objectives. We optimize diverse risk objectives by extending the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm with policy, value, and quantile neural networks, where the quantile network estimates the full conditional cost quantile function and enables numerical evaluation of general risk objectives. A comprehensive empirical study demonstrates the framework's elicitation accuracy and effectiveness in complex financial environments.2026-07-15T21:22:50ZYang LiuYuhao LiuYunran Weihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21929v2Extended Convolution Bounds on the Fréchet Problem: Robust Risk Aggregation and Risk Sharing2026-07-15T16:25:21ZIn this paper, we provide extended convolution bounds for the Fréchet problem and discuss related implications in quantitative risk management. First, we establish a new form of inequality for the Range-Value-at-Risk (RVaR). Based on this inequality, we obtain bounds for robust risk aggregation with dependence uncertainty for (i) RVaR, (ii) inter-RVaR difference and (iii) inter-quantile difference, and provide sharpness conditions. These bounds are called extended convolution bounds, which not only complement the results in the literature (convolution bounds in Blanchet et al. (2025)) but also offer results for some variability measures. Next, applying the above inequality, we study the risk sharing for the averaged quantiles (corresponding to risk sharing for distortion risk measures with special inverse S-shaped distortion functions), which is a non-convex optimization problem. We obtain the expression of the minimal value of the risk sharing and the explicit expression for the corresponding optimal allocation, which is comonotonic risk sharing for large losses and counter-comonotonic risk sharing for small losses or large gains. Finally, we explore the dependence structure for the optimal allocations, showing that the optimal allocation does not exist if the risk is not bounded from above.2025-11-26T21:44:05Z36 pagesPeng LiuYang LiuHouhan Tenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11328v2Strategic OTC market making with reputation feedback2026-07-15T15:49:58ZElectronic over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity provision is increasingly shaped not only by the price of the next quote, but also by a dealer's accumulated standing with clients and platforms. We develop a stochastic-control model in which request-for-quote (RFQ) win ratios and streaming fill ratios feed back into future flow through performance-based flow gates, creating an explicit trade-off between immediate spread capture and long-term franchise value. The resulting policy naturally alternates between reputation-building campaigns and franchise monetization phases, and can generate multiple stable client-flow regimes even in a parsimonious single dealer control problem.2026-07-13T09:47:18ZAlexander Barzykinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13637v5Extremal cases of distortion risk measures with partial information2026-07-15T00:41:02ZThis paper investigates the impact of distributional uncertainty on key risk measures under the partial knowledge of underlying distributions characterized by their first two moments and shape information (specifically symmetry and/or unimodality). We first employ probability inequalities to establish the theoretical best- and worst-case bounds on Value-at-Risk, reflecting the most extreme tail risk achievable within the moment and shape constraints, and then we extend this worst-case/best-case analysis to a broad class of distortion risk measures by the modified Schwarz inequality, deriving their corresponding robust bounds under the same partial information setting concerning moments and distribution shapes of the underlying distributions. In addition, we give a clear characterization of the distributions that attain the best- and worst-case scenarios. The proposed approach provides a unified framework for extremal problems of distortion risk measures.2024-04-21T12:25:03Z35 pagesMengshuo ZhaoNarayanaswamy BalakrishnanChuancun YinHui Shaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13112v1Anchored Geodesic Analysis for Multivariate Extremes2026-07-14T12:31:29ZExtremal dependence is naturally described by the angular law of large multivariate observations. We introduce anchored geodesic component analysis (AGCA), a dimension-reduction method for extremal angular laws on the positive unit sphere. AGCA approximates angular variation by great subspheres constrained to pass through a chosen reference direction, with balanced complete dependence as the default anchor. Under a bounded sine-squared geodesic loss, the population and empirical problems reduce exactly to eigenanalysis of a second-moment matrix of anchored tangent departures. The resulting scores, loadings, residual risks and explained-variation summaries describe departures from the benchmark and remain well defined for face and near-axis extremes. Low-rank AGCA reconstructions also support tail simulation: bounded Lipschitz functionals and homogeneous tail scores, including portfolio capped excesses and value-at-risk, inherit explicit error bounds from the AGCA residual risk. We establish top-\(k\) consistency for oracle and rank-Pareto AGCA summaries and an oracle central limit theorem whose covariance is that of an independent sample from the limiting angular law. In daily equity-portfolio losses, AGCA finds concentrated benchmark-relative tail directions: ten components explain about \(91\%\) of anchored variation and approximate capped-excess and normalized value-at-risk summaries with about \(1.25\%\) average relative error.2026-07-14T12:31:29ZAlberto QuainiChen Zhouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02987v3Model Combination in Risk Sharing under Ambiguity2026-07-14T05:38:47ZWe consider the problem of an agent who faces losses in continuous time over a finite time horizon and may choose to share some of these losses with a counterparty. The agent is uncertain about the true loss distribution and has multiple models for the losses, characterized by a finite set of probability measures. Their goal is to optimize a mean-variance type criterion with model combination under ambiguity through risk sharing. We construct such a criterion using the chi-squared divergence, exploiting a dual representation to expand the state space, yielding a time consistent problem. Assuming a Cramér-Lundberg loss model, we fully characterize the optimal risk sharing contract and the agent's wealth process under the optimal strategy. We prove that the strategy we obtain is admissible and that the value function satisfies the appropriate verification conditions. Furthermore, we show that the model combination problem is equivalent to the monotone mean-variance problem of Maccheroni et al. (2009) under a composite probability measure that depends on the agent's reference probability measures. Finally, we apply the optimal strategy to an insurance setting in a simulation example and provide numerical illustrations of the results.2025-04-03T19:26:11ZEmma KroellSebastian JaimungalSilvana M. Pesentihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03903v2Taming Tail Risk: Regime-Weighted Conformal Calibration for Nonstationary Value-at-Risk2026-07-13T18:08:18ZValue-at-risk (VaR) forecasts drive trading constraints and capital allocation, yet realized exceedance rates concentrate in stress periods, when losses are largest. This paper studies sequential one-sided VaR calibration via conformal prediction. Regime-weighted conformal calibration (RWC) wraps any quantile forecaster and calibrates an additive safety buffer from past forecast errors, weighted by exponential time decay and regime similarity computed from simple market features; time-weighted calibration (TWC) is the kernel-free special case. Rather than assuming weighted exchangeability with respect to the algorithm's own weights, the coverage gap is bounded for arbitrary data-driven weights by conditioning on the regime path and exploiting total-variation smoothness of the score distribution across regimes and time. On the CRSP value-weighted index and sixteen CRSP-derived equity portfolios (1990--2024), RWC is benchmarked against adaptive conformal inference, DtACI, and conformal PID control at the Basel-relevant 99% and 97.5% levels. Time-decay calibration is a strong default under drift; regime weighting improves stress-regime calibration when the base forecaster adapts slowly and tightens bounds when it does not, and effective-sample-size diagnostics indicate when localization is reliable.2026-02-03T12:34:19ZMarc Schmitthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21426v2Evolution and determinants of firm-level systemic risk in local production networks2026-07-13T14:39:16ZRecent crises like the Covid-19 pandemic and geopolitical tensions have exposed vulnerabilities and caused disruptions of supply chains, leading to product shortages, increased costs, and economic instability. This has prompted growing efforts to assess systemic risk, namely the effects of firm disruptions on entire economies. However, the ability of firms to react to crises by rewiring their supply links has been largely overlooked, limiting our understanding of production networks resilience. Here, we study dynamics and determinants of firm-level systemic risk in the Hungarian economy from 2015 to 2022. We benchmark our results to a heuristic maximum entropy null model that generates randomized production networks while preserving the total input (demand) and output (supply) of each firm at the sector level. We show that the fairly stable set of firms with highest systemic risk undergoes a structural change during Covid-19, as those enabling economic exchanges become key players in the economy -- a pattern not reproduced by the null model. Although empirical systemic risk closely matches the null value prior to the pandemic, it becomes significantly lower afterwards, reflecting the emergence of a more resilient economy driven by firms' adaptive behavior. Furthermore, firms' international trade volume (being itself a channel of potential disruption) becomes a significant predictor of their systemic risk. However, international linkages alone cannot fully explain the observed trends, as imports and exports exert opposing effects on local systemic risk through the supply and demand channels.2025-06-26T16:08:22Z15 pages, 4 figuresPNAS Nexus, pgag233 (2026)Anna ManciniBalázs LengyelRiccardo Di ClementeGiulio Cimini10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag233http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23842v3Environmental CVA with KL-Robust Wrong-Way Risk2026-07-13T07:18:21ZAlthough climate and nature related scenario analysis is increasingly important in finance, operational implementations remain limited for translating long horizon environmental scenarios into counterparty credit risk measures used in pricing and regulatory capital. We propose an environmental valuation adjustment framework for CVA with three components: (i) a scenario to credit translation that maps environmental scenario drivers into hazard rates; (ii) nature specific tail generators that quantify model risk in scenario generation; and (iii) a distributionally robust wrong way risk bound based on Kullback Leibler (KL) divergence. We compute climate CVAs using transition scenarios and nature CVAs using biodiversity indicators. Our results show that nature CVAs can vary materially across alternative ecosystem generators, highlighting an additional source of model uncertainty.2026-03-25T01:55:51ZTakayuki Sakumahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25899v2Fast catastrophe bond valuation with neural-network surrogates2026-07-13T06:11:49ZCatastrophe bonds are increasingly important risk-transfer securities, but structural pricing is too slow for real-time valuation, screening, and sensitivity analysis. We develop a neural-network surrogate for the pricing operator of a compound-Poisson catastrophe bond model. Training labels are generated by Monte Carlo simulation with importance sampling, so the network learns variance-reduced structural prices rather than sparse market quotes which are difficult to extrapolate reliably. Across Gamma and Lognormal severity specifications, the selected networks attain very small absolute approximation error on the stated training domain. After training, 1000 contracts are priced in about 0.03--0.04 seconds, compared with tens to hundreds of seconds for Monte Carlo with importance sampling and many hours for a partial integro-differential equation benchmark. The result is a fast in-domain structural valuation engine that also produces economically interpretable sensitivities to catastrophe intensity, attachment threshold, and interest rates.2025-09-30T07:44:25ZJulian SesterHuansang Xuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10810v1Diachronic Sample Integration: Robust Tail-Risk Estimation with Generative Models2026-07-12T15:45:23ZDeep generative models are increasingly used as simulators for downstream decision-making under data scarcity, but in risk-sensitive applications their usefulness depends on rare adverse scenarios rather than typical samples. Standard generative objectives prioritize bulk distributional fidelity, leaving low-probability tails vulnerable to localized optimization noise and making tail-dependent functionals unstable under finite simulation budgets. We introduce Diachronic Sample Integration (DSI), a test-time inference framework that ensembles generated samples across checkpoints from a stochastic training trajectory. DSI targets a checkpoint-mixture distribution that averages checkpoint-specific tail fluctuations rather than relying on a single brittle endpoint. We formalize this mechanism through a finite-budget bias-variance theory. Empirically, across multivariate synthetic processes and high-frequency trading data, DSI substantially reduces tail-estimation error compared to single-checkpoint baselines under fixed simulation budgets, outperforming standard diffusion and state-of-the-art tail-aware baselines without modifying the generative objective.2026-07-12T15:45:23ZShuning ZhaoPatrick WongLeran ZhangXiaolin Huhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10700v1An Extreme Value Perspective on Learning Stress Laws2026-07-12T10:46:41ZWe introduce Self-Similar Generative Estimation (SS-GEN), a method for simulating multivariate tail events and estimating rare-event probabilities in both heavy and light-tailed settings. SS-GEN exploits asymptotic tail structure to decompose the tail distribution into an explicit radial component and a nonparametric angular component, reducing tail learning to a compact-domain problem that can be handled by off-the-shelf deep generative models. The resulting sampler generates representative extreme scenarios and supports probability estimation far beyond the observed data. Under mild nonparametric tail assumptions, we show that the SS-GEN density is asymptotically exact in the tail, with vanishing uniform relative error for regularly varying distributions and vanishing uniform log-relative error for Weibull-type distributions. Unlike existing approaches that rely on specialized architectures or parametric tail specifications, SS-GEN leverages asymptotic tail structure to enable standard generative models to generate representative extreme samples and estimate rare-event probabilities beyond the observed data.2026-07-12T10:46:41ZMantu GuptaAnand Deohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03874v4ASRI: An Aggregated Systemic Risk Index for Cryptocurrency Markets2026-07-11T22:18:52ZCryptocurrency markets exceed USD 3 trillion in capitalisation, yet practitioners lack an interpretable, channel-decomposed composite for characterising crypto-native systemic stress. We introduce the Aggregated Systemic Risk Index (ASRI), built from four weighted sub-indices -- Stablecoin Concentration Risk (30%), DeFi Liquidity Risk (25%), Contagion Risk (25%, implemented as a TradFi-stress proxy), and Regulatory Opacity Risk (20%) -- with a Diebold--Yilmaz connectedness series computed on the sub-indices as network benchmark. We evaluate ASRI retrospectively against four crises (Terra/Luna, Celsius/3AC, FTX, SVB) and give a methodological account of how autocorrelation- and block-structure-robust inference reshapes apparent crisis-detection strength. The event-study signal is inconclusive: heavily serially correlated (AR(1) $\approx 0.8$--$0.9$), with placebo dates clearing the nominal threshold as often as crises. Fixed-threshold detection flags three of four events with $\approx$19-day average lead ($\approx$5 days under a responsive specification); walk-forward thresholds flag 4/4 but at high false-positive cost -- evidence against look-ahead bias, not a clean prediction record. ASRI's day-level discrimination (AUROC 0.866) beats only the circular D--Y comparator (0.670); it is statistically indistinguishable from its strongest sub-index (0.851), PC1 (0.858), and a standalone VIX series (0.875, $p=0.58$). We read aggregation's value as interpretive -- channel attribution, lead time, and regime structure in one auditable composite -- not as discriminative gain. With four crisis events the binding power limit, ASRI is a transparent, reproducible, retrospective monitoring framework targeting crypto-native vulnerabilities that SRISK and CoVaR are not built to capture, not a validated early-warning system. Out of sample it classifies the 2025 Bybit hack as non-systemic.2026-02-01T08:42:23Z109 pages, 7 figures, 39 tables. Code at https://github.com/studiofarzulla/asri ; live dashboard: https://asri.dissensus.aiMurad FarzullaAndrew Maksakovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05155v3Optimal Risk-Sharing Rules in Network-based Decentralized Insurance2026-07-11T04:48:35ZThis paper studies decentralized risk-sharing on networks. In particular, we consider a model where agents are nodes in a given network structure. Agents directly connected by edges in the network are referred to as friends. We study actuarially fair risk-sharing under the assumption that only friends can share risk, and we characterize the optimal signed linear risk-sharing rule in this network setting. Subsequently, we consider a special case of this model where all the friends of an agent take on an equal share of the agent's risk, and establish a connection to the graph Laplacian. Our results are illustrated with several examples.2026-02-05T00:16:46Z24 pages, 2 figuresHeather N. FogartySooie-Hoe LokeNicholas F. MarshallEnrique A. Thomann