https://arxiv.org/api/VGoTa+wc5f2knormRcHyIOLNbkQ 2026-03-20T08:52:02Z 2819 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18969v1 2026-03-19T14:35:31Z

As insurers increasingly behave like financial intermediaries and actively participate in capital markets, understanding the dependence structure between insurance and financial risks becomes crucial for insurers' operations. This paper studies dynamic equilibrium insurance pricing when insurers face ambiguity about the correlation between insurance and financial risks and optimally choose underwriting and investment strategies under worst-case beliefs. Correlation ambiguity can generate multiple equilibrium regimes. Contrary to conventional intuition, we find ambiguity does not necessarily increase insurance prices nor reduce insurers' utility.

2026-03-19T14:35:31Z Shunzhi Pang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18962v1 2026-03-19T14:27:54Z

This paper develops a dynamic equilibrium model of the insurance market that jointly characterizes insurers' underwriting, investment, recapitalization, and dividend policies under model uncertainty and financial frictions. Competitive insurers maximize shareholder value under a subjective worst-case probability measure, giving rise to liquidity-driven underwriting cycles and flight-to-quality behavior. While an equilibrium typically fails to exist in such dynamic liquidity management framework with external financial investment, we show that incorporating model uncertainty restores equilibrium existence under plausible parameter conditions. Moreover, the model uncovers a novel relationship between the correlation of insurance and financial market risks and the equilibrium insurance price: negative loadings may emerge when insurance gains and financial returns are positively correlated, contrary to conventional intuition.

2026-03-19T14:27:54Z Bingzheng Chen Jan Dhaene Chun Liu Shunzhi Pang http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08193v3 2026-03-18T18:51:58Z

The lack of high-quality public cyber incident data limits empirical research and predictive modeling for cyber risk assessment. This challenge persists due to the reluctance of companies to disclose incidents that could damage their reputation or investor confidence. Therefore, from an actuarial perspective, potential resolutions conclude two aspects: the enhancement of existing cyber incident datasets and the implementation of advanced modeling techniques to optimize the use of the available data. A review of existing data-driven methods highlights a significant lack of entity-specific organizational features in publicly available datasets. To address this gap, we propose a novel InsurTech framework that enriches cyber incident data with entity-specific attributes. We develop various machine learning (ML) models: a multilabel classification model to predict the occurrence of cyber incident types (e.g., Privacy Violation, Data Breach, Fraud and Extortion, IT Error, and Others) and a multioutput regression model to estimate their annual frequencies. While classifier and regressor chains are implemented to explore dependencies among cyber incident types as well, no significant correlations are observed in our datasets. Besides, we apply multiple interpretable ML techniques to identify and cross-validate potential risk factors developed by InsurTech across ML models. We find that InsurTech empowered features enhance prediction occurrence and frequency estimation robustness compared to only using conventional risk factors. The framework generates transparent, entity-specific cyber risk profiles, supporting customized underwriting and proactive cyber risk mitigation. It provides insurers and organizations with data-driven insights to support decision-making and compliance planning.

2025-07-10T22:04:00Z Variance 19 (February) Jiayi Guo Zhiyu Quan Linfeng Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17954v1 2026-03-18T17:28:26Z

This paper develops a unified framework for the robustification of risk measures beyond the classical convex and cash-additive setting. We consider general risk measures on Lp spaces and construct their robust counterparts through families of uncertainty sets that capture ambiguity. Two complementary mechanisms generate robust quasi-convex measures: in the first, quasi-convexity is inherited from the initial risk measure under convex uncertainty sets; in the second it comes from the quasi-convex (or c-quasi-convex) structure of the uncertainty sets themselves. Building on Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (2011); Frittelli and Maggis (2011), we derive dual (penalty-type) representations for robust quasi-convex and cash-subadditive risk measures, showing that the classical convex cash-additive case arises as a special instance. We further analyze acceptance families and capital allocation rules under robustification, highlighting how ambiguity affects acceptability and the distribution of capital.

2026-03-18T17:28:26Z Francesca Centrone Asmerilda Hitaj Elisa Mastrogiacomo Emanuela Rosazza Gianin http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17792v1 2026-03-18T14:51:59Z

The purpose of this paper is to describe and extend the use of the newly-introduced measure, residual estimation risk. Following the seminal work of Bignozzi and Tsanakas, the quantification of residual estimation risk is proposed in a multivariate framework. Our aim is to provide a succinct and practical introduction to the concept, to motivate its use as a back-testing measure, and to provide examples related to credit risk parameter estimation. In section 2, we introduce residual estimation risk defined by various risk measures, and illustrate the calculation using R and SAS. In section 3, we propose a back-testing criterion for the measure, which can be altered to assess model performance for both accuracy and conservatism. In section 4, we conduct back-testing on risk parameter estimates of retail credit portfolios, including multiple back-testing measures for comparison. Finally, we conclude our findings and propose areas for future work in section 5.

2026-03-18T14:51:59Z 19 pages D. J. Manuge http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06238v2 2026-03-18T12:05:46Z

In life insurance, life tables are used to estimate the survival distribution of individuals from a given population. However, these tables only provide survival probabilities at integer ages but no information about the distribution of deaths between two consecutive integer values. This incompleteness is particularly relevant for modern insurance products such as variable annuities, whose payoffs depend jointly on lifetime uncertainty and financial market performance. The valuation of such contracts must therefore be carried out in a joint actuarial-financial framework, as their values depend not only on the full information about mortality rates but also on the interaction between mortality risk, asset dynamics, and embedded guarantees. One frequent solution to this incompleteness is to postulate fractional age assumptions or mortality rate models, but it turns out that the results of the computations strongly depend on these restrictive assumptions. We hence derive upper and lower bounds of hybrid functionals of the lifetime with respect to mortality rates, which are compatible with the observed life table at integer ages and the given financial market. We derive two sets of results under distinct assumptions. In the first, we assume that each mortality trajectory is almost surely consistent with all the given one-year survival probabilities from the table. In the second, we consider a relaxed formulation that allows for deviations of the mortality rates while still being consistent in expectation with the given one-year reference survival probabilities. These distinct yet complementary approaches provide a new robust joint actuarial-financial framework for managing mortality risk in life insurance. They characterize the worst- and best-case contract values over all mortality processes that remain compatible with the observed life-table information and the financial market.

2026-03-06T13:00:20Z Jean-Loup Dupret Edouard Motte http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17463v1 2026-03-18T08:10:41Z

We assess the advantage of combining univariate and multivariate portfolio risk forecasts with the aid of forecast reconciliation techniques. In our analyzes, we assume knowledge of portfolio weights, a standard for portfolio risk management applications. With an extensive simulation experiment, we show that, if the true covariance is known, forecast reconciliation improves over a standard multivariate approach, in particular when the adopted multivariate model is misspecified. However, if noisy proxies are used, correctly specified models and the misspecified ones (for instance, neglecting spillovers) turn out to be, in several cases, indistinguishable, with forecast reconciliation still providing improvements. The noise in the covariance proxy plays a crucial role in determining the improvement of both the forecast reconciliation and the correct model specification. An empirical analysis shows how forecast reconciliation can be adopted with real data to improve traditional GARCH-based portfolio variance forecasts.

2026-03-18T08:10:41Z Massimiliano Caporin Daniele Girolimetto Emanuele Lopetuso http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18448v3 2026-03-17T18:09:23Z

We introduce a family of particle systems on sparse graphs where local interactions occur via hitting times, providing a dynamic and tractable model for default cascades in large sparsely-connected financial networks. Building on the framework of Lacker, Ramanan and Wu (2023), we extend convergence theory to systems with singular interactions, capturing the abrupt and discontinuous nature of systemic events. We establish conditions for well-posedness through a minimality principle and connect fragility to dynamic percolation thresholds. Our analysis demonstrates continuity of the joint law of defaults with respect to local graph convergence, establishes convergence of empirical distributions, and characterizes the default time distribution in tree-like networks. This framework offers a rigorous and flexible foundation for modeling systemic risk in evolving financial systems, featuring continuous-time dynamics, heterogeneous and local interactions, and instantaneous default cascades.

2025-05-24T01:11:09Z Yucheng Guo Qinxin Yan http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14546v2 2026-03-17T07:20:26Z

We study the problem of asset liquidation in financial systems. During financial crises, asset liquidation is often inevitable but can lead to substantial losses if a significant amount of illiquid assets are sold simultaneously at depressed prices -- a phenomenon known as price impact. To tackle this challenge, we consider a two-period liquidation model that allows for early liquidation prior to clearing, thereby mitigating price impact at clearing, and we develop a worst-case approach to solve the decision-making problem on the optimal size of early liquidation. Specifically, we propose a robust optimal strategy -- a tractable liquidation approach that maximizes the worst-case value of liquid assets at clearing, taking into account the uncertainty of other banks' early liquidation decisions. We derive a (semi-)closed-form representation of this strategy in a practical scenario involving permanent price impact and analyze its sensitivity to that impact's magnitude. We further identify its closed-form expression in another practical scenario featuring interbank exposures. Our findings, although built upon a stylized model, offer valuable guidelines for developing robust liquidation strategies that mitigate losses resulting from asset liquidation.

2026-03-15T18:41:43Z Dohyun Ahn Hongyi Jiang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15963v1 2026-03-16T22:25:42Z

Auto-deleveraging (ADL) mechanisms are a critical yet understudied component of risk management on cryptocurrency futures exchanges. When available margin and other loss-absorbing resources are insufficient to cover losses following large price moves, exchanges reduce positions and socialize losses among solvent participants via rule-based ADL protocols. We formulate ADL as an optimization problem that minimizes the exchange's risk of loss arising from future equity shortfalls. In a single-asset, isolated-margin setting, we show that under a risk-neutral expected loss objective the unique optimal policy minimizes the maximum leverage among participants. The resulting design has a transparent structure: positions are reduced first for the most highly levered accounts, and leverage is progressively equalized via a water-filling (or ``leverage-draining'') rule. This policy is distribution-free, wash-trade resistant, Sybil resistant, and path-independent. It provides a canonical and implementable benchmark for ADL design and clarifies the economic logic underlying queue-based mechanisms used in practice. We further study the multi-asset, cross-margin setting, where the ADL problem becomes genuinely multi-dimensional: the exchange must allocate a vector of required reductions across accounts with portfolios exposed to correlated price moves. We show that under an expected-loss objective the problem remains separable across accounts after introducing asset-level shadow prices, yielding a scalable numerical method. We observe that naive gross leverage can be misleading in this context as it ignores hedging within portfolios. When asset prices are driven by a single dominant risk factor, the optimal policy again takes a water-filling form, but now in a factor-adjusted notion of leverage, so that more effectively hedged portfolios are deleveraged less aggressively.

2026-03-16T22:25:42Z Steven Campbell Natascha Hey Ciamac C. Moallemi Marcel Nutz http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15947v1 2026-03-16T21:53:00Z

We study cubic cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization, a higher-order extension of the standard Markowitz formulation where three-way sector co-movement terms augment the quadratic risk-return objective. Classical heuristics like simulated annealing (SA) and tabu search require Rosenberg quadratization of these cubic interactions. This inflates the variable count from n to 5n and introduces penalty terms that substantially distort the augmented search landscape. In contrast, Hyper-Adaptive Momentum Dynamics (HAMD) operates directly on the native higher-order objective using a hybrid pipeline combining continuous Hamiltonian search, exact cardinality-preserving projection, and iterated local search (ILS). On a cubic portfolio benchmark under matched 60-second CPU budgets, HAMD achieves substantially lower decoded native cubic objective values than SA and tabu search, yielding single-seed relative improvements of 87.9%, 71.2%, 59.5%, and 46.9% at n = 200, 300, 500, and 1000. In a detailed three-seed study at n = 200, HAMD attains a median native objective of 195.65 (zero variance), while SA and tabu yield 1208.07. Decoded-feasibility analysis shows SA satisfies all exact cardinality and Rosenberg auxiliary constraints, yet decodes to a native objective 80-88% worse than HAMD, demonstrating a surrogate-distortion effect rather than simple infeasibility. Exact calibration on small instances (n = 20, 25, 30) confirms HAMD finds the provably global optimum in 9/9 trials. These results demonstrate that native higher-order search offers a substantial advantage over quadratized surrogate optimization for constrained cubic portfolio problems.

2026-03-16T21:53:00Z 15 pages, 0 figures, 10 tables. Reference implementation and benchmark reproduction scripts available at: https://github.com/symplectic-opt/hamd-community Greg Serbarinov http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15839v1 2026-03-16T19:14:48Z

In this paper, we propose a novel frequency-severity joint trip-level risk index that combines the frequency of abnormal driving patterns with a severity component reflecting how extreme such behavior is relative to a portfolio-level baseline. Severity is quantified through an inverse-probability penalty that increases with the rarity of observed tail extremes, rather than being interpreted as a claim size. Based on high-frequency telematics data, we construct a multi-scale representation of longitudinal acceleration using the maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform (MODWT), which preserves localized driving patterns across multiple time scales. To capture severity as tail rarity, we model the portfolio distribution using a Gaussian-Uniform mixture with a layered tail structure, where Gaussian components describe typical driving behavior and the tail is partitioned into ordered severity layers that reflect increasing extremeness. We develop a likelihood-based estimation procedure that makes inference feasible for this mixture model. The resulting severity layers are then used to construct multi-layer tail counts (MLTC) at the trip level, which are modeled within a Poisson-Gamma framework to yield a closed-form posterior risk index that jointly reflects frequency and severity. This conjugate structure naturally supports sequential updating, enabling the construction of dynamically evolving driver-level risk profiles. Using the UAH-DriveSet controlled dataset, we demonstrate that the proposed index enables reliable discrimination across behavioral driving states, identification of high-risk trips, and coherent ranking of drivers, yielding a purely behavior-driven risk measure suitable for actuarial ratemaking and potentially mitigating fairness concerns associated with traditional covariates.

2026-03-16T19:14:48Z 31 pages, 4 figures. Submitted to ASTIN Bulletin Jongtaek Lee Andrei Badescu X. Sheldon Lin http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02357v2 2026-03-16T15:28:03Z

We introduce a semiparametric approach for forecasting Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) by modeling the conditional scale of financial returns, defined as the difference between two specified quantiles, via restricted quantile regression. Focusing on downside risk, VaR is derived from the left-tail quantile of rescaled returns, and ES is approximated by averaging quantiles below the VaR level. The method delivers robust, distribution-free estimates of extreme losses and captures skewness, heavy tails, and leverage effects. Simulation experiments and empirical analysis show that it often outperforms established models, including GARCH and joint VaR-ES conditional-quantile approaches. An application to daily returns on major international stock indices, spanning the COVID-19 period, highlights its effectiveness in capturing risk dynamics.

2026-03-02T19:56:54Z Xiaochun Liu Richard Luger 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.12.002 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15369v1 2026-03-16T14:44:36Z

This work evaluates the impact of contagious cyber-events, over a finite horizon, on firms' financial health and on a cyber insurance portfolio. Our approach builds on key empirical findings from economics and cybersecurity. In economics, firm size and growth-rate distributions are non-Gaussian and exhibit heavy tails. In cybersecurity, contagion dynamics strongly depend on firm size and environmental conditions. To capture these features, we propose a stochastic multi-group SIR model coupled with a granular model of firm growth. This framework allows us to quantify the financial impact of cyber-attacks on firms' revenues and on the insurer's portfolio. In the model, the arrival time and duration of cyber-attacks are driven by a combination of a Cox process and a Bernoulli random variable. The Cox process represents external contagion, with an intensity given by the force of infection derived from the stochastic SIR dynamics. The Bernoulli component captures contagion originating from an infected sister or subsidiary firm. Environmental variability enables stochastic scenario generation and the computation of aggregate exceedance probabilities, a standard metric in catastrophe modeling that provides insurers with immediate insight into the financial severity of an event. We apply the framework to the LockBit ransomware attacks observed between May and July 2024. For a portfolio of 2,929 firms located in Ile-de-France, the model predicts that, with 50% probability, the insurer will need to compensate losses equivalent to up to two days of revenue over a 100-day cyber incident.

2026-03-16T14:44:36Z 38 pages, 14 figures Caroline Hillairet Olivier Lopez Lionel Sopgoui http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.01943v4 2026-03-16T13:57:08Z

In this paper, we establish the stochastic ordering of the Gini indexes for multivariate elliptical risks which generalized the corresponding results for multivariate normal risks. It is shown that several conditions on dispersion matrices and the components of dispersion matrices of multivariate normal risks for the monotonicity of the Gini index in the usual stochastic order proposed by Samanthi, Wei and Brazauskas (2016) and Kim and Kim (2019) are also suitable for multivariate elliptical risks. We also study the tail probability of Gini index for multivariate elliptical risks and revised a large deviation result for the Gini indexes of multivariate normal risks in Kim and Kim (2019).

2019-08-06T03:45:41Z 14pages Xuehua Yin Dan Zhu Chuancun Yin