https://arxiv.org/api/Kcny4ANMyaoWzHvlXVso3NVDgHU2026-03-20T15:57:39Z21706015http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10823v1Option-Implied Zero-Coupon Yields: Unifying Bond and Equity Markets2025-12-11T17:14:44ZThis paper addresses a critical inconsistency in models of the term structure of interest rates (TSIR), where zero-coupon bonds are priced under risk-neutral measures distinct from those used in equity markets. We propose a unified TSIR framework that treats zero-coupon bonds as European options with deterministic payoffs ensuring that they are priced under the same risk-neutral measure that governs equity derivatives. Using put-call parity, we extract zero-coupon bond implied yield curves from S&P 500 index options and compare them with the US daily treasury par yield curves. As the implied yield curves contain maturity time T and strike price K as independent variables, we investigate the K-dependence of the implied yield curve. Our findings, that at-the-money, option-implied yield curves provide the closest match to treasury par yield curves, support the view that the equity options market contains information that is highly relevant for the TSIR. By insisting that the risk-neutral measure used for bond valuation is the same as that revealed by equity derivatives, we offer a new organizing principle for future TSIR research.2025-12-11T17:14:44ZMain article: 18 pages, 9 figures. Supplementary material: 7 pages and 6 figuresTing-Jung LeeW. Brent LindquistSvetlozar T. RachevAbootaleb Shirvanihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15984v2Berms without Calibration2025-12-11T08:33:46ZA new semi-analytical pricing model for Bermudan swaptions based on swap rates distributions and correlations between them. The model does not require product specific calibration.2025-10-13T12:31:34ZJournal of Risk, Volume 28, Number 1 (October 2025), Pages 31-53K. E. Feldman10.21314/JOR.2025.015http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08890v1Modelling and valuation of catastrophe bonds across multiple regions2025-12-09T18:31:25ZThe insurance-linked securities (ILS) market, as a form of alternative risk transfer, has been at the forefront of innovative risk-transfer solutions. The catastrophe bond (CAT bond) market now represents almost half of the entire ILS market and is growing steadily. Since CAT bonds are often tied to risks in different regions, we follow this idea by constructing different pricing models that incorporate various scenarios of dependence between catastrophe losses in different areas. Namely, we consider independent, proportional, and arbitrary two-dimensional distribution cases. We also derive a normal approximation of the prices. Finally, to include the market price of risk, we apply Wang's transform. We illustrate the differences between the scenarios and the performance of the approximation on the Property Claim Services data.2025-12-09T18:31:25ZKrzysztof BurneckiMarek TeuerleMartyna Zdebhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05326v1Convolution-FFT for option pricing in the Heston model2025-12-05T00:09:29ZWe propose a convolution-FFT method for pricing European options under the Heston model that leverages a continuously differentiable representation of the joint characteristic function. Unlike existing Fourier-based methods that rely on branch-cut adjustments or empirically tuned damping parameters, our approach yields a stable integrand even under large frequency oscillations. Crucially, we derive fully analytical error bounds that quantify both truncation error and discretization error in terms of model parameters and grid settings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to provide such explicit, closed-form error estimates for an FFT-based convolution method specialized to the Heston model. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical rates and illustrate robust, high-accuracy option pricing at modest computational cost.2025-12-05T00:09:29Z21 pages, 6 figuresXiang GaoCody Hyndmanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05301v1Differential ML with a Difference2025-12-04T22:38:07ZDifferential ML (Huge and Savine 2020) is a technique for training neural networks to provide fast approximations to complex simulation-based models for derivatives pricing and risk management. It uses price sensitivities calculated through pathwise adjoint differentiation to reduce pricing and hedging errors. However, for options with discontinuous payoffs, such as digital or barrier options, the pathwise sensitivities are biased, and incorporating them into the loss function can magnify errors. We consider alternative methods for estimating sensitivities and find that they can substantially reduce test errors in prices and in their sensitivities. Using differential labels calculated through the likelihood ratio method expands the scope of Differential ML to discontinuous payoffs. A hybrid method incorporates gamma estimates as well as delta estimates, providing further regularization.2025-12-04T22:38:07Z15 pages, 6 figuresPaul GlassermanSiddharth Hemant Karmarkarhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00280v2Retail Investor Horizon and Earnings Announcements2025-12-04T22:35:24ZThis paper moves beyond aggregate measures of retail intensity to explore investment horizon as a distinguishing feature of earnings-related return patterns. Using self-reported holding periods from StockTwits (2010-2021), we observe that separating retail activity into "long-horizon" and "short-horizon" cohorts reveals divergent price anomalies. Long-horizon composition is associated with underreaction, characterized by larger initial reactions and pronounced Post-Earnings Announcement Drift (PEAD), suggesting a slow but persistent convergence toward fundamental value. In contrast, short-horizon activity parallels sentiment-driven overreaction, where elevated pre-event sentiment precedes weaker subsequent performance and price reversals. A zero-cost strategy exploiting this heterogeneity, going long on long-horizon stocks and short on short-horizon stocks, yields risk-adjusted alphas of 0.43% per month. These findings suggest that accounting for investment horizon helps disentangles the fundamental signal in retail flow from speculative noise.2025-11-29T02:10:22ZDomonkos F. Vamossyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03922v1A Co-evolutionary Approach for Heston Calibration2025-12-03T16:09:36ZWe evaluate a co-evolutionary calibration framework for the Heston model in which a genetic algorithm (GA) over parameters is coupled to an evolving neural inverse map from option surfaces to parameters. While GA-history sampling can reduce training loss quickly and yields strong in-sample fits to the target surface, learning-curve diagnostics show a widening train--validation gap across generations, indicating substantial overfitting induced by the concentrated and less diverse dataset. In contrast, a broad, space-filling dataset generated via Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) achieves nearly comparable calibration accuracy while delivering markedly better out-of-sample stability across held-out surfaces. These results suggest that apparent improvements from co-evolutionary data generation largely reflect target-specific specialization rather than a more reliable global inverse mapping, and that maintaining dataset diversity is critical for robust amortized calibration.2025-12-03T16:09:36ZJulian Gutierrezhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04093v2Dynamic Asset Pricing with α-MEU Model2025-12-03T09:34:55ZWe study a dynamic asset pricing problem in which a representative agent is ambiguous about the aggregate endowment growth rate and trades a risky stock, human capital, and a risk-free asset to maximize her preference value of consumption represented by the α-maxmin expected utility model. This preference model is known to be dynamically inconsistent, so we consider intra-personal equilibrium strategies for the representative agent and define the market equilibrium as the one in which the strategy that clears the market is an intra-personal equilibrium. We prove the existence and uniqueness of the market equilibrium and show that the asset prices in the equilibrium are the same as in the case when the agent does not perceive any ambiguity but believes in a particular probabilistic model of the endowment process. We show that with reasonable parameter values, the more ambiguity the agent perceives or the more ambiguity-averse she is, the lower the risk-free rate, the higher the stock price, the higher the stock risk premium, and the lower the stock volatility.2025-07-05T16:34:57ZJiacheng FanXue Dong HeRuocheng Wuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07886v1The Endogenous Constraint: Hysteresis, Stagflation, and the Structural Inhibition of Monetary Velocity in the Bitcoin Network (2016-2025)2025-11-30T19:51:43ZBitcoin operates as a macroeconomic paradox: it combines a strictly predetermined, inelastic monetary issuance schedule with a stochastic, highly elastic demand for scarce block space. This paper empirically validates the Endogenous Constraint Hypothesis, positing that protocol-level throughput limits generate a non-linear negative feedback loop between network friction and base-layer monetary velocity. Using a verified Transaction Cost Index (TCI) derived from Blockchain.com on-chain data and Hansen's (2000) threshold regression, we identify a definitive structural break at the 90th percentile of friction (TCI ~ 1.63). The analysis reveals a bifurcation in network utility: while the network exhibits robust velocity growth of +15.44% during normal regimes, this collapses to +6.06% during shock regimes, yielding a statistically significant Net Utility Contraction of -9.39% (p = 0.012). Crucially, Instrumental Variable (IV) tests utilizing Hashrate Variation as a supply-side instrument fail to detect a significant relationship in a linear specification (p=0.196), confirming that the velocity constraint is strictly a regime-switching phenomenon rather than a continuous linear function. Furthermore, we document a "Crypto Multiplier" inversion: high friction correlates with a +8.03% increase in capital concentration per entity, suggesting that congestion forces a substitution from active velocity to speculative hoarding.2025-11-30T19:51:43Z42 pages, 13 figures. JEL Classification: E41, E51, G15, C24Hamoon Soleimanihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.23295v1Signature approach for pricing and hedging path-dependent options with frictions2025-11-28T15:52:04ZWe introduce a novel signature approach for pricing and hedging path-dependent options with instantaneous and permanent market impact under a mean-quadratic variation criterion. Leveraging the expressive power of signatures, we recast an inherently nonlinear and non-Markovian stochastic control problem into a tractable form, yielding hedging strategies in (possibly infinite) linear feedback form in the time-augmented signature of the control variables, with coefficients characterized by non-standard infinite-dimensional Riccati equations on the extended tensor algebra. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of these signature-based strategies for pricing and hedging general path-dependent payoffs in the presence of frictions. In particular, market impact naturally smooths optimal trading strategies, making low-truncated signature approximations highly accurate and robust in frictional markets, contrary to the frictionless case.2025-11-28T15:52:04ZEduardo Abi JaberDonatien HainautEdouard Mottehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22782v1Factors Influencing Cryptocurrency Prices: Evidence from Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dash, Litecoin, and Monero2025-11-27T22:16:47ZThis paper examines factors that influence prices of most common five cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dash, Litecoin, and Monero over 2010-2018 using weekly data. The study employs ARDL technique and documents several findings. First, cryptomarket-related factors such as market beta, trading volume, and volatility appear to be significant determinant for all five cryptocurrencies both in short- and long-run. Second, attractiveness of cryptocurrencies also matters in terms of their price determination, but only in long-run. This indicates that formation (recognition) of the attractiveness of cryptocurrencies are subjected to time factor. In other words, it travels slowly within the market. Third, SP500 index seems to have weak positive long-run impact on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litcoin, while its sign turns to negative losing significance in short-run, except Bitcoin that generates an estimate of -0.20 at 10% significance level. Lastly, error-correction models for Bitcoin, Etherem, Dash, Litcoin, and Monero show that cointegrated series cannot drift too far apart, and converge to a long-run equilibrium at a speed of 23.68%, 12.76%, 10.20%, 22.91%, and 14.27% respectively.2025-11-27T22:16:47ZJournal of Economics and Financial Analysis, (2018), Vol.2, No.2, pp. 1-27Yhlas Sovbetovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21873v1A3T-GCN for FTSE100 Components Price Forecasting2025-11-26T19:51:13ZWe examine the predictive power of a novel hybrid A3T-GCN architecture for forecasting closing stock prices of FTSE100 constituents. The dataset comprises 79 companies and 375,329 daily observations from 2007 to 2024, with node features including technical indicators (RSI, MACD), normalized and log returns, and annualized log returns over multiple windows (ALR1W, ALR2W, ALR1M, ALR2M). Graphs are constructed based on sector classifications and correlations of returns or financial ratios. Our results show that the A3T-GCN model using annualized log-returns and shorter sequence lengths improves prediction accuracy while reducing computational requirements. Additionally, longer historical sequences yield only modest improvements, highlighting their importance for longer-term forecasts.2025-11-26T19:51:13ZA. L. Paredeshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18578v1Re(Visiting) Time Series Foundation Models in Finance2025-11-23T18:44:19ZFinancial time series forecasting is central to trading, portfolio optimization, and risk management, yet it remains challenging due to noisy, non-stationary, and heterogeneous data. Recent advances in time series foundation models (TSFMs), inspired by large language models, offer a new paradigm for learning generalizable temporal representations from large and diverse datasets. This paper presents the first comprehensive empirical study of TSFMs in global financial markets. Using a large-scale dataset of daily excess returns across diverse markets, we evaluate zero-shot inference, fine-tuning, and pre-training from scratch against strong benchmark models. We find that off-the-shelf pre-trained TSFMs perform poorly in zero-shot and fine-tuning settings, whereas models pre-trained from scratch on financial data achieve substantial forecasting and economic improvements, underscoring the value of domain-specific adaptation. Increasing the dataset size, incorporating synthetic data augmentation, and applying hyperparameter tuning further enhance performance.2025-11-23T18:44:19ZEghbal RahimikiaHao NiWeiguan Wang10.2139/ssrn.577056http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16295v5Joint Pricing in SPX and VIX Derivative Markets with Composite Change of Time Models2025-11-21T07:44:06ZThe Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX) is calculated from SPX options and derivatives of VIX are also traded in market, which leads to the so-called ``consistent modeling" problem. This paper proposes a time-changed Lévy model for log price with a composite change of time structure to capture both features of the implied SPX volatility and the implied volatility of volatility. Consistent modeling is achieved naturally via flexible choices of jumps and leverage effects, as well as the composition of time changes. Many celebrated models are covered as special cases. From this model, we derive an explicit form of the characteristic function for the asset price (SPX) and the pricing formula for European options as well as VIX options. The empirical results indicate great competence of the proposed model in the problem of joint calibration of the SPX/VIX Markets.2024-04-25T02:26:15ZLiexin ChengXue ChengXianhua Penghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06274v1Why `Fair Market Valuations' are Inappropirate for Employee-Owned Firms and Partnerships2025-11-09T08:24:37ZThe usual formulas for the fair market valuation of a firm at time $t$ include the profits accruing to the shares at time $t$ from the use of wage or salaried labor in the future. But in employee-owned firms or partnerships, the future worker-members or partners are the residual claimants at those future times, so in those cases, the future residuals do not accrue to the current shareholder/residual-claimants. Hence any `fair market valuation' of an employee-owned firm or partnership that assumes those future residuals accrue to the current shareholder/residual-claimants is inappropriate.
Keywords: fair market valuations, residual claimants, property rights, personal rights, Miller-Modigliani valuations.2025-11-09T08:24:37ZDavid Ellerman