https://arxiv.org/api/PrTvxXf9K9W+ShTBH+hZRQQsBSM2026-03-20T14:14:52Z21704515http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01250v1European Options in Market Models with Multiple Defaults: the BSDE approach2026-01-03T18:00:22ZWe study non-linear Backward Stochastic Differential Equations (BSDEs) driven by a Brownian motion and p default martingales. The driver of the BSDE with multiple default jumps can take a generalized form involving an optional finite variation process. We first show existence and uniqueness. We then establish comparison and strict comparison results for these BSDEs, under a suitable assumption on the driver. In the case of a linear driver, we derive an explicit formula for the first component of the BSDE using an adjoint exponential semimartingale. The representation depends on whether the finite variation process is predictable or only optional. We apply our results to the problem of pricing and hedging a European option in a linear complete market with two defaultable assets and in a non-linear complete market with p defaultable assets. Two examples of the latter market model are provided: an example where the seller of the option is a large investor influencing the probability of default of a single asset and an example where the large seller's strategy affects the default probabilities of all p assets.2026-01-03T18:00:22ZMiryana GrigorovaJames Wheeldonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16251v3Interpretable Deep Learning for Stock Returns: A Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model2025-12-31T06:16:51ZWe introduce the Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model (CB-APM), a framework that reconciles the predictive power of deep learning with the structural transparency of traditional finance. By embedding aggregate analyst consensus as a structural "bottleneck", the model treats professional beliefs as a sufficient statistic for the market's high-dimensional information set. We document a striking "interpretability-accuracy amplification effect" for annual horizons, the structural constraint acts as an endogenous regularizer that significantly improves out-of-sample R2 over unconstrained benchmarks. Portfolios sorted on CB-APM forecasts exhibit a strong monotonic return gradient, delivering an annualized Sharpe ratio of 1.44 and robust performance across macroeconomic regimes. Furthermore, pricing diagnostics reveal that the learned consensus captures priced variation only partially spanned by canonical factor models, identifying structured risk heterogeneity that standard linear models systematically miss. Our results suggest that anchoring machine intelligence to human-expert belief formation is not merely a tool for transparency, but a catalyst for uncovering new dimensions of belief-driven risk premiums.2025-12-18T07:05:25ZBong-Gyu JangYounwoo JeongChangeun Kim10.2139/ssrn.5165817http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0009042v2Tradable Schemes2025-12-28T10:27:14ZIn this article we present a new approach to the numerical valuation of derivative securities. The method is based on our previous work where we formulated the theory of pricing in terms of tradables. The basic idea is to fit a finite difference scheme to exact solutions of the pricing PDE. This can be done in a very elegant way, due to the fact that in our tradable based formulation there appear no drift terms in the PDE. We construct a mixed scheme based on this idea and apply it to price various types of arithmetic Asian options, as well as plain vanilla options (both european and american style) on stocks paying known cash dividends. We find prices which are accurate to $\sim 0.1%$ in about 10ms on a Pentium 233MHz computer and to $\sim 0.001%$ in a second. The scheme can also be used for market conform pricing, by fitting it to observed option prices.2000-09-04T14:28:48Z13 pages, 5 tables, LaTeX 2e, v2: added convergence proofJiri HooglandCWIDimitri NeumannCWIhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22660v1Machine learning models for predicting catastrophe bond coupons using climate data2025-12-27T17:19:52ZIn recent years, the growing frequency and severity of natural disasters have increased the need for effective tools to manage catastrophe risk. Catastrophe (CAT) bonds allow the transfer of part of this risk to investors, offering an alternative to traditional reinsurance. This paper examines the role of climate variability in CAT bond pricing and evaluates the predictive performance of various machine learning models in forecasting CAT bond coupons. We combine features typically used in the literature with a new set of climate indicators, including Oceanic Ni{ñ}o Index, Arctic Oscillation, North Atlantic Oscillation, Outgoing Longwave Radiation, Pacific-North American pattern, Pacific Decadal Oscillation, Southern Oscillation Index, and sea surface temperatures. We compare the performance of linear regression with several machine learning algorithms, such as random forest, gradient boosting, extremely randomized trees, and extreme gradient boosting. Our results show that including climate-related variables improves predictive accuracy across all models, with extremely randomized trees achieving the lowest root mean squared error (RMSE). These findings suggest that large-scale climate variability has a measurable influence on CAT bond pricing and that machine learning methods can effectively capture these complex relationships.2025-12-27T17:19:52ZJulia KończalMichał BalcerekKrzysztof Burneckihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20190v1Pricing of wrapped Bitcoin and Ethereum on-chain options2025-12-23T09:29:57ZThis paper measures price differences between Hegic option quotes on Arbitrum and a model-based benchmark built on Black--Scholes model with regime-sensitive volatility estimated via a two-regime MS-AR-(GJR)-GARCH model. Using option-level feasible GLS, we find benchmark prices exceed Hegic quotes on average, especially for call options. The price spread rises with order size, strike, maturity, and estimated volatility, and falls with trading volume. By underlying, wrapped Bitcoin options show larger and more persistent spreads, while Ethereum options are closer to the benchmark. The framework offers a data-driven analysis for monitoring and calibrating on-chain option pricing logic.2025-12-23T09:29:57ZAnastasiia Zbanduthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20027v1GIFfluence: A Visual Approach to Investor Sentiment and the Stock Market2025-12-23T03:39:26ZWe study dynamic visual representations as a proxy for investor sentiment about the stock market. Our sentiment index, GIFsentiment, is constructed from millions of posts in the Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) on a leading investment social media platform. GIFsentiment correlates with seasonal mood variations and the severity of COVID lockdowns. It is positively associated with contemporaneous market returns and negatively predicts returns for up to four weeks, even after controlling for other sentiment and attention measures. These effects are stronger among portfolios that are more susceptible to mispricing. GIFsentiment positively predicts trading volume, market volatility, and flows toward equity funds and away from debt funds. Our evidence suggests that GIFsentiment is a proxy for misperceptions that are later corrected.2025-12-23T03:39:26ZMing GuDavid HirshleiferSiew Hong TeohShijia Wuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19821v1How to choose my stochastic volatility parameters? A review2025-12-22T19:21:21ZBased on the existing literature, this article presents the different ways of choosing the parameters of stochastic volatility models in general, in the context of pricing financial derivative contracts. This includes the use of stochastic volatility inside stochastic local volatility models.2025-12-22T19:21:21ZFabien Le Floc'hhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19625v1Counterexamples for FX Options Interpolations -- Part II2025-12-22T17:57:56ZThis follow-up article analyzes the impact of foreign exchange option interpolation on the vanilla option implied volatilities. In particular different exact interpolations of broker quotes may lead to different implied volatilities at the 10$Δ$ and 25$Δ$ Puts and Calls.2025-12-22T17:57:56ZJherek Healyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19621v1Counterexamples for FX Options Interpolations -- Part I2025-12-22T17:55:07ZThis article provides a list of counterexamples, where some of the popular fx option interpolations break down. Interpolation of FX option prices (or equivalently volatilities), is key to risk-manage not only vanilla FX option books, but also more exotic derivatives which are typically valued with local volatility or local stochastic volatilility models.2025-12-22T17:55:07ZJherek Healyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00815v1Almost-Exact Simulation Scheme for Heston-type Models: Bermudan and American Option Pricing2025-12-22T17:50:34ZRecently, an Almost-Exact Simulation (AES) scheme was introduced for the Heston stochastic volatility model and tested for European option pricing. This paper extends this scheme for pricing Bermudan and American options under both Heston and double Heston models. The AES improves Monte Carlo simulation efficiency by using the non-central chi-square distribution for the variance process. We derive the AES scheme for the double Heston model and compare the performance of the AES schemes under both models with the Euler scheme. Our numerical experiments validate the effectiveness of the AES scheme in providing accurate option prices with reduced computational time, highlighting its robustness for both models. In particular, the AES achieves higher accuracy and computational efficiency when the number of simulation steps matches the exercise dates for Bermudan options.2025-12-22T17:50:34Z20 pages, 4 figures. Revised version under consideration for publicationMara Kalicanin DimitrovMarko DimitrovAnatoliy MalyarenkoYing Nihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19611v1Heston vol-of-vol and the VVIX2025-12-22T17:47:33ZThe Heston stochastic volatility model is arguably, the most popular stochastic volatility model used to price and risk manage exotic derivatives. In spite of this, it is not necessarily easy to calibrate to the market and obtain stable exotic option prices with this model. This paper focuses on the vol-of-vol parameter and its relation with the volatility of volatility index (VVIX) level. Four different approaches to estimate the VVIX in the Heston model are presented: two based on the known transition density of the variance, one analytical approximation, and one based on the Heston PDE which computes the value directly out of the underlying SPX500. Finally we explore their use to improve calibration stability.2025-12-22T17:47:33ZJherek Healyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16009v2Universal approximation on non-geometric rough paths and applications to financial derivatives pricing2025-12-21T14:50:27ZWe present a novel perspective on the universal approximation theorem for rough path functionals, introducing a polynomial-based approximation class. We extend universal approximation to non-geometric rough paths within the tensor algebra. This development addresses critical needs in finance, where no-arbitrage conditions necessitate Itô integration. Furthermore, our findings motivate a hypothesis for payoff functionals in financial markets, allowing straightforward analysis of signature payoffs proposed in \cite{arribas2018derivativespricingusingsignature}.2024-12-20T16:00:30ZFabian A. HarangFred Espen BenthFride Straumhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16989v2Optimal Ratcheting of Dividends with Irreversible Reinsurance2025-12-19T12:26:21ZThis paper considers an insurance company that faces two key constraints: a ratcheting dividend constraint and an irreversible reinsurance constraint. The company allocates part of its reserve to pay dividends to its shareholders while strategically purchasing reinsurance for its claims. The ratcheting dividend constraint ensures that dividend cuts are prohibited at any time. The irreversible reinsurance constraint ensures that reinsurance contracts cannot be prematurely terminated or sold to external entities. The dividend rate and reinsurance level are modeled as nondecreasing processes, thereby satisfying the constraints. Claims are modeled using a Brownian risk model. The main objective is to maximize the cumulative expected discounted dividend payouts until the time of ruin. The reinsurance and dividend levels are restricted to a finite set. The optimal value function is shown to be the unique viscosity solution of the corresponding Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation. A threshold strategy is constructed and shown to be optimal. Finally, numerical examples are presented to illustrate the optimality conditions and optimal strategies.2024-08-30T03:34:29Z28 pages, 1 figure, 1 tableTim J. BoonenEngel John C. Dela Vegahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14839v4Multi-Task Dynamic Pricing in Credit Market with Contextual Information2025-12-17T05:59:44ZWe study the dynamic pricing problem faced by a broker seeking to learn prices for a large number of credit market securities, such as corporate bonds, government bonds, loans, and other credit-related securities. A major challenge in pricing these securities stems from their infrequent trading and the lack of transparency in over-the-counter (OTC) markets, which leads to insufficient data for individual pricing. Nevertheless, many securities share structural similarities that can be exploited. Moreover, brokers often place small "probing" orders to infer competitors' pricing behavior. Leveraging these insights, we propose a multi-task dynamic pricing framework that leverages the shared structure across securities to enhance pricing accuracy.
In the OTC market, a broker wins a quote by offering a more competitive price than rivals. The broker's goal is to learn winning prices while minimizing expected regret against a clairvoyant benchmark. We model each security using a $d$-dimensional feature vector and assume a linear contextual model for the competitor's pricing of the yield, with parameters unknown a priori. We propose the Two-Stage Multi-Task (TSMT) algorithm: first, an unregularized MLE over pooled data to obtain a coarse parameter estimate; second, a regularized MLE on individual securities to refine the parameters. We show that the TSMT achieves a regret bounded by $\tilde{O} ( δ_{\max} \sqrt{T M d} + M d ) $, outperforming both fully individual and fully pooled baselines, where $M$ is the number of securities and $δ_{\max}$ quantifies their heterogeneity.2024-10-18T19:37:36ZAdel JavanmardJingwei JiRenyuan Xuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12871v1CapOptix: An Options-Framework for Capacity Market Pricing2025-12-14T23:08:38ZElectricity markets are under increasing pressure to maintain reliability amidst rising renewable penetration, demand variability, and occasional price shocks. Traditional capacity market designs often fall short in addressing this by relying on expected-value metrics of energy unserved, which overlook risk exposure in such systems. In this work, we present CapOptix, a capacity pricing framework that interprets capacity commitments as reliability options, i.e., financial derivatives of wholesale electricity prices. CapOptix characterizes the capacity premia charged by accounting for structural price shifts modeled by the Markov Regime Switching Process. We apply the framework to historical price data from multiple electricity markets and compare the resulting premium ranges with existing capacity remuneration mechanisms.2025-12-14T23:08:38ZMillend RoyAgostino CapponiVladimir PyltsovYinbo HuVijay Modi