https://arxiv.org/api/Etr4AwQ4QiKr8UYmO9fGWaw3RLY2026-03-22T10:28:48Z217015015http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16006v3Crypto Inverse-Power Options and Fractional Stochastic Volatility2025-06-16T16:12:13ZRecent empirical evidence has highlighted the crucial role of jumps in both price and volatility within the cryptocurrency market. In this paper, we integrate price--volatility co-jumps and volatility short-term dependency into a coherent model framework, featuring fractional stochastic volatility. We particularly focus on inverse options, including the emerging Quanto inverse options and their power-type generalizations, aiming at mitigating cryptocurrency exchange rate risk and adjusting inherent risk exposure. Characteristic function-based pricing--hedging formulas are derived for these inverse options. The model framework is applied to asymmetric Laplace jump-diffusions and Gaussian-mixed tempered stable-type processes, employing three types of fractional kernels, for an extensive empirical analysis involving model calibration on two independent Bitcoin options data sets, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Key insights from our theoretical analysis and empirical findings include: (1) the superior performance of fractional stochastic-volatility models compared to various benchmark models, including those incorporating jumps and stochastic volatility, along with high computational efficiency when utilizing a piecewise kernel, (2) the practical necessity of considering jumps in both price and volatility, along with rough volatility, in pricing and hedging cryptocurrency options, (3) stability of calibrated parameter values in line with stylized facts.2024-03-24T04:30:51Z44 pages, 2 tables, 7 figures; added figuresBoyi LiWeixuan Xiahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12584v1Small Volatility Approximation and Multi-Factor HJM Models2025-06-14T17:37:25ZHere we demonstrate how we can use Small Volatility Approximation in calibration of Multi-Factor HJM model with deterministic correlations, factor volatilities and mean reversals. It is noticed that quality of this calibration is very good and it does not depend on number of factors.2025-06-14T17:37:25Z7 pages, 4 figuresV. M. Belyaevhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08573v1Designing funding rates for perpetual futures in cryptocurrency markets2025-06-10T08:42:32ZIn cryptocurrency markets, a key challenge for perpetual future issuers is maintaining alignment between the perpetual future price and target value. This study addresses this challenge by exploring the relationship between funding rates and perpetual future prices. Our results demonstrate that by appropriately designing funding rates, the perpetual future price can remain aligned with the target value. We develop replicating portfolios for perpetual futures, offering issuers an effective method to hedge their positions. Additionally, we provide path-dependent funding rates as a practical alternative and investigate the difference between the original and path-dependent funding rates. To achieve these results, our study employs path-dependent infinite-horizon BSDEs in conjunction with arbitrage pricing theory. Our main results are obtained by establishing the existence and uniqueness of solutions to these BSDEs and analyzing the large-time behavior of these solutions.2025-06-10T08:42:32ZJaehyun KimHyungbin Parkhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11257v3Prediction-Enhanced Monte Carlo: A Machine Learning View on Control Variate2025-06-07T13:51:59ZFor many complex simulation tasks spanning areas such as healthcare, engineering, and finance, Monte Carlo (MC) methods are invaluable due to their unbiased estimates and precise error quantification. Nevertheless, Monte Carlo simulations often become computationally prohibitive, especially for nested, multi-level, or path-dependent evaluations lacking effective variance reduction techniques. While machine learning (ML) surrogates appear as natural alternatives, naive replacements typically introduce unquantifiable biases. We address this challenge by introducing Prediction-Enhanced Monte Carlo (PEMC), a framework that leverages modern ML models as learned predictors, using cheap and parallelizable simulation as features, to output unbiased evaluation with reduced variance and runtime. PEMC can also be viewed as a "modernized" view of control variates, where we consider the overall computation-cost-aware variance reduction instead of per-replication reduction, while bypassing the closed-form mean function requirement and maintaining the advantageous unbiasedness and uncertainty quantifiability of Monte Carlo.
We illustrate PEMC's broader efficacy and versatility through three examples: first, equity derivatives such as variance swaps under stochastic local volatility models; second, interest rate derivatives such as swaption pricing under the Heath-Jarrow-Morton (HJM) interest-rate model. Finally, we showcase PEMC in a socially significant context - ambulance dispatch and hospital load balancing - where accurate mortality rate estimates are key for ethically sensitive decision-making. Across these diverse scenarios, PEMC consistently reduces variance while preserving unbiasedness, highlighting its potential as a powerful enhancement to standard Monte Carlo baselines.2024-12-15T17:41:38ZFengpei LiHaoxian ChenJiahe LinArkin GuptaXiaowei TanHonglei ZhaoGang XuYuriy NevmyvakaAgostino CapponiHenry Lamhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24159v2A Causation-Based Framework for Pricing and Cost Allocation of Energy, Reserves, and Transmission in Modern Power Systems2025-06-04T19:35:22ZThe increasing vulnerability of power systems has heightened the need for operating reserves to manage contingencies such as generator outages, line failures, and sudden load variations. Unlike energy costs, driven by consumer demand, operating reserve costs arise from addressing the most critical credible contingencies - prompting the question: how should these costs be allocated through efficient pricing mechanisms? As an alternative to previously reported schemes, this paper presents a new causation-based pricing framework for electricity markets based on contingency-constrained energy and reserve scheduling models. Major salient features include a novel security charge mechanism along with the explicit definition of prices for up-spinning reserves, down-spinning reserves, and transmission services. These features ensure more comprehensive and efficient cost-reflective market operations. Moreover, the proposed nodal pricing scheme yields revenue adequacy and neutrality while promoting reliability incentives for generators based on the cost-causation principle. An additional salient aspect of the proposed framework is the economic incentive for transmission assets, which are remunerated based on their use to deliver energy and reserves across all contingency states. Numerical results from two case studies illustrate the performance of the proposed pricing scheme.2025-05-30T03:07:06ZLuiza RibeiroAlexandre StreetJose Manuel ArroyoRodrigo Morenohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01820v2Signature volatility models: pricing and hedging with Fourier2025-06-02T07:42:12ZWe consider a stochastic volatility model where the dynamics of the volatility are given by a possibly infinite linear combination of the elements of the time extended signature of a Brownian motion. First, we show that the model is remarkably universal, as it includes, but is not limited to, the celebrated Stein-Stein, Bergomi, and Heston models, together with some path-dependent variants. Second, we derive the joint characteristic functional of the log-price and integrated variance provided that some infinite dimensional extended tensor algebra valued Riccati equation admits a solution. This allows us to price and (quadratically) hedge certain European and path-dependent options using Fourier inversion techniques. We highlight the efficiency and accuracy of these Fourier techniques in a comprehensive numerical study.2024-02-02T16:27:00ZSIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics Vol. 16, Iss. 2 (2025)Eduardo Abi JaberLouis-Amand Gérard10.1137/24M1636952http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00263v2A framework for the valuation of insurance liabilities by production cost2025-06-01T17:53:55ZThis paper sets out a framework for the valuation of insurance liabilities that is intended to be economically realistic, elementary, reasonably practically applicable, and as a special case to provide a basis for the valuation in regulatory solvency systems such as Solvency II and the SST. The valuation framework is based on the cost of producing the liabilities to an insurance company that is subject to solvency regulation (regulatory solvency capital requirements) and insolvency laws (consequences of failure) in finite discrete time. Starting from the replication approach of classical no-arbitrage theory, the framework additionally considers the nature and cost of capital (expressed by a ``financiability condition"), that the liabilities may be required to be fulfilled only ``in sufficiently many cases" (expressed by a ``fulfillment condition"), production using ``fully illiquid" assets in addition to tradables, and the asymmetry between assets and liabilities. We identify necessary and sufficient conditions on the capital investment under which the framework recovers the market prices of tradables, investigate extending production to take account of insolvency, implications of using illiquid assets in the production, and show how Solvency II and SST valuation can be derived with specific assumptions.2023-12-30T15:30:44Z35 pages, no figuresChristoph Moehrhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22957v1Fast Derivative Valuation from Volatility Surfaces using Machine Learning2025-05-29T00:42:56ZWe introduce a fast and flexible Machine Learning (ML) framework for pricing derivative products whose valuation depends on volatility surfaces. By parameterizing volatility surfaces with the 5-parameter stochastic volatility inspired (SVI) model augmented by a one-factor term structure adjustment, we first generate numerous volatility surfaces over realistic ranges for these parameters. From these synthetic market scenarios, we then compute high-accuracy valuations using conventional methodologies for two representative products: the fair strike of a variance swap and the price and Greeks of an American put. We then train the Gaussian Process Regressor (GPR) to learn the nonlinear mapping from the input risk factors, which are the volatility surface parameters, strike and interest rate, to the valuation outputs. Once trained, We use the GPR to perform out-of-sample valuations and compare the results against valuations using conventional methodologies. Our ML model achieves very accurate results of $0.5\%$ relative error for the fair strike of variance swap and $1.7\% \sim 3.5\%$ relative error for American put prices and first-order Greeks. More importantly, after training, the model computes valuations almost instantly, yielding a three to four orders of magnitude speedup over Crank-Nicolson finite-difference method for American puts, enabling real-time risk analytics, dynamic hedging and large-scale scenario analysis. Our approach is general and can be extended to other path-dependent derivative products with early-exercise features, paving the way for hybrid quantitative engines for modern financial systems.2025-05-29T00:42:56Z10 pages, 10 figuresLijie DingEgang LuKin Cheunghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17906v4Why do financial prices exhibit Brownian motion despite predictable order flow?2025-05-27T09:32:30ZIn financial market microstructure, there are two enigmatic empirical laws: (i) the market-order flow has predictable persistence due to metaorder splitters by institutional investors, well formulated as the Lillo-Mike-Farmer model. However, this phenomenon seems paradoxical given the diffusive and unpredictable price dynamics; (ii) the price impact $I(Q)$ of a large metaorder $Q$ follows the square-root law, $I(Q)\propto \sqrt{Q}$. Here we theoretically reveal why price dynamics follows Brownian motion despite predictable order flow by unifying these enigmas. We generalize the Lillo-Mike-Farmer model to nonlinear price-impact dynamics, which is mapped to an exactly solvable Lévy-walk model. Our exact solution shows that the price dynamics remains diffusive under the square-root law, even under persistent order flow. This work illustrates the crucial role of the square-root law in mitigating large price movements by large metaorders, thereby leading to the Brownian price dynamics, consistently with the efficient market hypothesis over long timescales.2025-02-25T07:12:03ZMain: 7 pages, 4 figures. SI: 6 pages, 3 figures. Minor bugs in simulation codes are fixedYuki SatoKiyoshi Kanazawahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16336v1The Role of Intangible Investment in Predicting Stock Returns: Six Decades of Evidence2025-05-22T07:52:09ZUsing an intangible intensity factor that is orthogonal to the Fama--French factors, we compare the role of intangible investment in predicting stock returns over the periods 1963--1992 and 1993--2022. For 1963--1992, intangible investment is weak in predicting stock returns, but for 1993--2022, the predictive power of intangible investment becomes very strong. Intangible investment has a significant impact not only on the MTB ratio (Fama--French high minus low [HML] factor) but also on operating profitability (OP) (Fama--French robust minus weak [RMW] factor) when forecasting stock returns from 1993 to 2022. For intangible asset-intensive firms, intangible investment is the main predictor of stock returns, rather than MTB ratio and profitability. Our evidence suggests that intangible investment has become an important factor in explaining stock returns over time, independent of other factors such as profitability and MTB ratio.2025-05-22T07:52:09ZFinancial Management, 2025Lin Li27E8;10.1111/fima.12505http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.04349v3A deep solver for BSDEs with jumps2025-05-21T19:21:48ZThe aim of this work is to propose an extension of the deep solver by Han, Jentzen, E (2018) to the case of forward backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs) with jumps. As in the aforementioned solver, starting from a discretized version of the FBSDE and parametrizing the (high dimensional) control processes by means of a family of artificial neural networks (ANNs), the FBSDE is viewed as a model-based reinforcement learning problem and the ANN parameters are fitted so as to minimize a prescribed loss function. We take into account both finite and infinite jump activity by introducing, in the latter case, an approximation with finitely many jumps of the forward process. We successfully apply our algorithm to option pricing problems in low and high dimension and discuss the applicability in the context of counterparty credit risk.2022-11-08T16:14:08Z33 pages. Accepted on SIAM Journal on Financial MathematicsKristoffer AnderssonAlessandro GnoattoMarco PataccaAthena Picarellihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08175v2Closed-form solutions for VIX derivatives in a Legendre empirical model2025-05-21T08:13:34ZIn this paper, we introduce a data-driven, single-parameter Markov diffusion model for the VIX. The volatility factor evolves in $(-1,1)$ with a uniform invariant distribution ensured by Legendre polynomials, mapped to the empirical distribution. We derive analytical series solutions for VIX futures and options using separation of variables to solve the Feynman-Kac PDE. Compared to the 3/2 model, our approach offers equal or superior accuracy and flexibility, providing an efficient, robust alternative for VIX pricing and risk management. Code and data are available at github.com/gagawjbytw/empirical-VIX.2023-09-15T05:46:43ZYing-Li WangCheng-Long XuPing Hehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13717v3Portfolios Generated by Contingent Claim Functions, with Applications to Option Pricing2025-05-19T17:35:53ZThis paper presents a synthesis of the theories of portfolio generating functions and option pricing. The theory of portfolio generation is extended to measure the value of portfolios generated by positive C^{2,1} functions of asset prices X_1,... , X_n directly, rather than with respect to a numeraire portfolio. If a portfolio generating function satisfies a specific partial differential equation, then the value of the portfolio generated by that function will replicate the value of the function. This differential equation is a general form of the Black-Scholes equation. Similar results apply to contingent claim functions, which are portfolio generating functions that are homogeneous of degree 1. With the addition of a riskless asset, an inhomogeneous portfolio generating function V : R^{+n} x [0, T] \to R^+ can be extended to an equivalent contingent claim function \hat{V} : R^+ x R^{+n} x [0, T] \to R^+ that generates the same portfolio and is replicable if and only if V is replicable. Several examples are presented.2023-08-26T00:42:00Z23 pagesRicardo T. FernholzRobert Fernholzhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12413v1The Stablecoin Discount: Evidence of Tether's U.S. Treasury Bill Market Share in Lowering Yields2025-05-18T13:33:37ZStablecoins represent a critical bridge between cryptocurrency and traditional finance, with Tether (USDT) dominating the sector as the largest stablecoin by market capitalization. By Q1 2025, Tether directly held approximately $98.5 billion in U.S. Treasury bills, representing 1.6% of all outstanding Treasury bills, making it one of the largest non-sovereign buyers in this crucial asset class, on par with nation-state-level investors. This paper investigates how Tether's market share of U.S. Treasury bills influences corresponding yields. The baseline semi-log time trend model finds that a 1% increase in Tether's market share is associated with a 1-month yield reduction of 3.8%, corresponding to 14-16 basis points. However, threshold regression analysis reveals a critical market share threshold of 0.973%, above which the yield impact intensifies significantly. In this high regime, a 1% market share increase reduces 1-month yields by 6.3%. At the end of Q1 2025, Tether's market share placed it firmly within this high-impact regime, reducing 1-month yields by around 24 basis points relative to a counterfactual. In absolute terms, Tether's demand for Treasury Bills equates to roughly $15 billion in annual interest savings for the U.S. government. Aligning with theories of liquidity saturation and nonlinear price impact, these results highlight that stablecoin demand can reduce sovereign funding costs and provide a potential buffer against market shocks.2025-05-18T13:33:37Z15 pages, 3 tables, 1 figureLennart AnteAman SagguIngo Fiedlerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17490v2Pricing Carbon Allowance Options on Futures: Insights from High-Frequency Data2025-05-16T10:11:34ZLeveraging a unique dataset of carbon futures option prices traded on the ICE market from December 2015 until December 2020, we present the results from an unprecedented calibration exercise. Within a multifactor stochastic volatility framework with jumps, we employ a three-dimensional pricing kernel compensating for equity and variance components' risk to derive an analytically tractable and numerically practical approach to pricing. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to provide an estimate of the equity and variance risk premia for the carbon futures option market. We gain insights into daily option and futures dynamics by exploiting the information from tick-by-tick futures trade data. Decomposing the realized measure of futures volatility into continuous and jump components, we employ them as auxiliary variables for estimating futures dynamics via indirect inference. Our approach provides a realistic description of carbon futures price, volatility, and jump dynamics and an insightful understanding of the carbon option market.2025-01-29T09:00:03ZMain text 38 pages, supplementary online information 11 pages, 6 figures, 12 tables. W.r.t Version 1, few typos fixedSimone SerafiniGiacomo Bormetti