https://arxiv.org/api/XN9O8UMSFADapTIvvVgaLB3KhaI 2026-07-22T19:43:22Z 2414 90 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.24144v2 2026-05-25T18:56:25Z

Deep learning offers new tools for portfolio optimization. We present an end-to-end framework that directly learns portfolio weights by combining Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to model temporal patterns, Graph Attention Networks (GAT) to capture evolving inter-stock relationships, and sentiment analysis of financial news to reflect market psychology. Unlike prior approaches, our model unifies these elements in a single pipeline that produces daily allocations. It avoids the traditional two-step process of forecasting asset returns and then applying mean--variance optimization (MVO), a sequence that can introduce instability. We evaluate the framework on nine U.S. stocks spanning six sectors, chosen to balance sector diversity and news coverage. In this setting, the model delivers higher cumulative returns and Sharpe ratios than equal-weighted and CAPM-based MVO benchmarks. Although the stock universe is limited, the results underscore the value of integrating price, relational, and sentiment signals for portfolio management and suggest promising directions for scaling the approach to larger, more diverse asset sets.

2025-09-29T00:42:24Z 22 pages, 9 figures Yun Lin Jiawei Lou Jinghe Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24490v1 2026-05-23T09:41:52Z

Multi-agent LLM decision systems for portfolio management still lack a principled way to assign credit across specialist agents, remain vulnerable to cold-start dominance under regime shifts, and offer limited transparency into how final allocations are formed. We propose Market Regime Council (MRC), a cooperative multi-agent decision system that computes exact Shapley credits across all single, pairwise, and Grand-coalition outputs for online agent weighting. Instantiated with N=3 specialist agents, at each trading period, MRC recomputes coalition-based Shapley weights from exponentially weighted performance histories, uses a Bayesian adaptive mixture to stabilize early periods, applies regime-dependent multipliers to adjust agent authority, and records each rebalance through a five-layer causal trace. Over 1,037 trading days across 13 crypto assets and five seeds, MRC achieves a Sharpe ratio of 1.51 and a cumulative return of 440.1%, ranking first on CR, SR, and IR among active baselines and attaining the lowest MDD among active methods. Ablation results show that the gains come from Shapley-weighted integration across coalition outputs rather than from any single stage in isolation. Code and demo data are included in the supplementary material.

2026-05-23T09:41:52Z 35 pages, 13 figures, preprint Yunhua Pei Zerui Ge Jin Zheng John Cartlidge http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23007v1 2026-05-21T20:28:57Z

We explore the application of LLM-driven algorithm optimization to several common tasks in quantitative finance. MadEvolve, a general-purpose algorithm optimization framework inspired by DeepMind's Alpha-Evolve, was recently developed to optimize algorithms in computational cosmology. Here we demonstrate the utility of MadEvolve to optimize algorithmic trading strategies and alpha generation at the example of Bitcoin trading. On our simulation and backtesting setup, we achieve significant improvements on all tasks we considered, such as evolving feature sets for signal generation, optimizing separate components of the trading strategy, and jointly evolving the feature pipeline together with the execution strategy. Additionally, we compare our method to other agentic search approaches, specifically Claude Code, and carefully evaluate p-hacking probabilities on our simulation setup. Our findings strongly support the utility of AI-driven agentic and evolutionary algorithms for algorithmic trading and quantitative finance.

2026-05-21T20:28:57Z Yurii Kvasiuk Tianyi Li Owen Colegrove Moritz Münchmeyer http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21409v1 2026-05-20T17:08:14Z

Institutional crossing platforms face a hidden-information problem: investors value trades as portfolios, but liquidity discovery is typically organized around individual securities. We model portfolio crossing as limited-communication preference elicitation over signed portfolio trades. The platform first uses price-directed demand queries to search the portfolio space and then verifies selected packages through value queries; an incumbent verification query records the demand-discovered allocation before further exploration. Final allocations are chosen from elicited reports, so the learning model guides queries but does not determine welfare. The analysis shows why search and verification are complementary. Demand queries locate high-value regions of a nonseparable portfolio space, but they provide only conservative welfare evidence unless selected packages are verified. Value queries provide exact welfare comparisons, but they are ineffective when applied to poorly targeted packages. Market-calibrated experiments using equity panels from the United States, Korea, Japan, and Germany show that demand-only and value-only designs recover only about half of full-information welfare under a limited query budget, whereas the hybrid procedure recovers 88\% and approaches 95\% as communication expands. We then compare exact security-level packages with factor-completed basket packages within the same allocation rule. Security-level packages are the unadjusted-efficiency mode when exact-securities disclosure is inexpensive. Factor-completed baskets become preferable when pretrade message informativeness is costly. The results characterize portfolio crossing as a selective verification problem and identify disclosure-sensitive package representation as a core design choice for hidden liquidity platforms.

2026-05-20T17:08:14Z Yoontae Hwang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19278v2 2026-05-20T14:49:39Z

This paper tests whether graph neural networks improve realized volatility forecasts and whether those forecasts improve portfolio performance. Using weekly realized volatility for 465 S&P 500 equities from 2015-2025, Heterogeneous Autoregressive and Long Short-Term Memory baselines are compared against GraphSAGE models built on rolling correlation, sector, and Granger-causal graphs, with and without macro regime features. The empirical finding is that the model with the lowest forecast MSE, the model with the highest cross-sectional ranking accuracy, and the model with the highest portfolio Sharpe ratio are three different models. Forecast accuracy, ranking quality, and portfolio performance are related but not interchangeable objectives. Graph volatility models add value only when the portfolio rule can exploit the cross-sectional structure they encode.

2026-05-19T02:52:00Z Rylan Wade http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17307v1 2026-05-17T07:50:37Z

This study develops and evaluates a deep reinforcement learning framework for dynamic portfolio allocation across global equity markets. The Soft Actor-Critic algorithm is used to learn continuous portfolio weights within a Markov Decision Process, incorporating transaction costs, turnover penalties, and diversification constraints into the reward function. Five model configurations are compared, varying in reward formulation, policy structure (flat versus hierarchical Dirichlet), portfolio constraints, and temporal encoder (LSTM versus Transformer), and evaluated via walk-forward optimization across sixteen out-of-sample folds spanning 2003-2026 on the Nasdaq-100, Nikkei 225, and Euro Stoxx 50. Results show that RL strategies achieve competitive risk-adjusted performance primarily in the Euro Stoxx 50, where statistically significant abnormal returns are observed, but the central hypothesis is only partially confirmed: no strategy achieves statistically significant excess returns relative to Buy and Hold under HAC-robust inference across all markets. Regime analysis reveals that RL adds the most value during periods of elevated uncertainty, while ensemble aggregation across markets improves risk-adjusted performance and confirms the benefits of geographic diversification.

2026-05-17T07:50:37Z 67 pages, 11 figures, 16 tables Kamil Kashif Robert Ślepaczuk http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18397v3 2026-05-17T05:15:14Z

We study optimal payoff choice for an expected utility maximizer under the constraint that their payoff is not allowed to deviate ``too much'' from a given benchmark. We solve this problem when the deviation is assessed via a Bregman-Wasserstein (BW) divergence, generated by a convex function $φ$. Unlike the Wasserstein distance (i.e., when $φ(x)=x^2$) the inherent asymmetry of the BW divergence makes it possible to penalize positive deviations different than negative ones. As a main contribution, we provide the optimal payoff in this setting. Numerical examples illustrate that the choice of $φ$ allow to better align the payoff choice with the objectives of investors.

2024-11-27T14:40:20Z Silvana M. Pesenti Steven Vanduffel Yang Yang Jing Yao http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28853v1 2026-05-16T22:30:15Z

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics - Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), and Risk Parity - allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model - an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss - achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points (a relative improvement of over 270%), while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework consistently outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

2026-05-16T22:30:15Z Rahul Fernandes Travis Desell http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16448v1 2026-05-15T03:04:50Z

This paper investigates risk measures derived from the expected maximum deficit in a continuous-time framework and develops optimal reserve allocation strategies across multiple lines of business. We formalize the expected maximum deficit and study its associated distortion risk measures. Furthermore, we introduce implicitly bounded risk measures based on the minimal capital required to meet prescribed fixed and proportional risk tolerances, and propose approaches for optimal capital allocation using line-specific distorted expected deficits. Theoretical results established include static coherence and convexity properties, dynamic conditional extensions detailing supermartingale time consistency over a fixed horizon and the evolution of capital requirements across rolling horizons, and exact analytical optimizations of the aggregate minimum reserve.

2026-05-15T03:04:50Z 33 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables Claude Lefevre Pierre Zuyderhoff http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.00573v9 2026-05-13T03:45:45Z

We apply the procedure of Lee et al. to the problem of performing inference on the signal-noise ratio of the asset which displays maximum sample Sharpe ratio over a set of possibly correlated assets. We find a multivariate analogue of the commonly used approximate standard error of the Sharpe ratio to use in this conditional estimation procedure. We also consider several alternative procedures, including the simple Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing, which we fix for the case of positive common correlation among assets, the chi-bar square test against one-sided alternatives, Follman's test, and Hansen's asymptotic adjustments. Testing indicates the conditional inference procedure achieves nominal type I rate, and does not appear to suffer from non-normality of returns. The conditional estimation test has low power under the alternative where there is little spread in the signal-noise ratios of the assets, and high power under the alternative where a single asset has high signal-noise ratio. Unlike the alternative procedures, it appears to enjoy rejection probabilities monotonic in the signal-noise ratio of the selected asset, and actually maintains near-nominal rejection rates under the conditional null.

2019-06-03T04:50:52Z code and latex source available from github repo, github.com/shabbychef/maxsharpe Steven E. Pav http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.12511v3 2026-05-12T15:39:15Z

This paper studies the topic of cost-efficiency in incomplete markets. A payoff is called cost-efficient if it achieves a given probability distribution at some given investment horizon with a minimum initial budget. Extensive literature exists for the case of a complete financial market. We show how the problem can be extended to incomplete markets and how the main results from the theory of complete markets still hold in adapted form. In particular, we find that in incomplete markets, the optimal portfolio choice for non-decreasing preferences that are diversification-loving (a notion introduced in this paper) must be "perfectly" cost-efficient. This notion of perfect cost-efficiency is shown to be equivalent to the fact that the payoff can be rationalized, i.e., it is the solution to an expected utility problem.

2022-06-24T23:07:39Z 32 pages. Examples and Counterexamples have been relegated to a separate document, upon journal editor's request: arXiv:2407.08756 Carole Bernard Stephan Sturm http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09712v1 2026-05-10T19:21:12Z

Average forecast accuracy is not the same as forecast reliability. I treat forecast loss differentials relative to a benchmark as a return series. I then evaluate these returns using risk-adjusted performance measures from finance, including the Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, Omega ratio, and drawdown-based metrics. I also introduce the Edge Ratio capturing a model's propensity to deliver uniquely informative predictions relative to the forecasting frontier. I apply this framework to U.S. macroeconomic forecasting, comparing econometric benchmarks, machine learning models, a foundation model (TabPFN), and the Survey of Professional Forecasters. While it is often feasible to beat professional forecasters in terms of average accuracy, it is much harder to beat them on a risk-adjusted basis. They rarely exhibit catastrophic failures and often achieve high Edge Ratios, plausibly reflecting the value of contextual judgment. Nonetheless, selected machine learning methods deliver attractive risk profiles for specific targets. The framework naturally extends to meta-analyses across targets, horizons, and samples, illustrated with a density forecast evaluation and the M4 competition.

2026-05-10T19:21:12Z Philippe Goulet Coulombe http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02326v2 2026-05-10T11:29:59Z

Large-scale portfolio choice is highly sensitive to estimation error, making the preliminary asset selection essential in empirical implementation. Existing selection rules typically rely on scalar returns or low dimensional high frequency summaries, and thus discard intraday risk dynamics that may be relevant for risk adjusted allocation. We propose Metric Dependence Screening (MDS), an asset selection procedure that incorporates high frequency information as object valued data. Each asset day observation is represented as a point-curve object combining daily return with an intraday risk state curve, equipped with a weighted product metric that preserves both reward information and within day risk dynamics. MDS ranks assets by a Fréchet variation based dependence score, measuring how much a risk adjusted target explains the metric dispersion of the asset representations. This yields a simple two stage portfolio procedure: MDS first reduces the investable universe, and standard mean-variance or minimum variance allocation is then applied. We develop a target slicing estimator and establish concentration, sure selection, and rank consistency guarantees under $α$-mixing time series dependence and ultrahigh dimensionality. Simulations show that MDS performs well across both Euclidean and non-Euclidean settings. Using high frequency data for $2938$ Chinese A-share stocks from July 2023 to December 2025, we demonstrate that MDS improves out of sample portfolio performance over return based and scalar dependence based benchmarks, highlighting the value of preserving intraday risk dynamics.

2026-05-04T08:26:39Z Yangzhou Chen Shuaida He Xin Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09310v1 2026-05-10T04:06:48Z

ESG-aware portfolio optimization is increasingly important for sustainable capital allocation, yet most learning-based methods still operationalize ESG by appending static scores to the policy observation or reward. This creates a mismatch for sequential control: ESG scores are noisy, provider-dependent, low-frequency, and temporally misaligned with sequential portfolio decisions, while financial evidence suggests that ESG is better treated as a portfolio preference, risk-exposure, or hedge dimension than as a robust alpha factor. We propose to impose ESG constraints without modifying the financial policy's observation or reward, using a Multimodal Action-Conditioned Constraint Field (MACF) that learns mechanism-specific ESG costs from point-in-time multimodal evidence and contemplated portfolio transitions. We then introduce MACF-X, a family of optimizer-specific adapters that converts MACF costs and uncertainties into native constrained-optimization interfaces through a shared slack- and uncertainty-aware pressure layer. Across multiple constraint-integration interfaces, MACF-X reduces tail ESG budget pressure while maintaining competitive financial performance. Ablations show that this improvement depends on dynamic evidence inputs and three-head decomposition, while static ESG-score proxies are nearly indistinguishable from score-shuffled noise baselines.

2026-05-10T04:06:48Z Xin Li Yan Ke Longbing Cao http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03184v2 2026-05-09T20:52:19Z

We study the single-period portfolio selection problem under Constant Relative Risk-Aversion (CRRA) utility through the information-theoretic lens. Assuming only that the market payoff vector has finite support, we show that the Certainty-Equivalent (CE) growth rate under CRRA utility can be decomposed into a portfolio-induced Rényi divergence term, a Rényi entropy term of the risk-tilted market law, and a log-partition term. In this setting, the Rényi order has a clear operational meaning: it exactly coincides with the investor's coefficient of relative risk aversion. We further show that CRRA portfolio selection is equivalent to a Rényi information-projection problem. Using a variational representation of Rényi divergence, we obtain a Blahut-Arimoto-style alternating optimization with a closed-form auxiliary update and a KL-type portfolio step. In the low risk-aversion regime, this method empirically requires fewer iterations than both direct CRRA utility optimization and Cover's method.

2026-05-04T21:52:58Z Submitted to IEEE ITW 2026 Bo-Yu Yang Michael Gastpar