https://arxiv.org/api/DaNShPvqgsV+qB7idM3dr+s44FU2026-07-22T23:38:04Z241416515http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22058v1Mean Field Equilibrium Asset Pricing Models With Exponential Utility2026-03-23T14:54:40ZThis thesis develops equilibrium asset pricing models in incomplete markets with a large number of heterogeneous agents using mean field game theory. The market equilibrium is characterized by a novel form of mean field backward stochastic differential equations (BSDEs). First, we propose a theoretical model that endogenously derives the equilibrium risk premium. Agents with exponential preferences are heterogeneous in initial wealth, risk aversion, and unspanned stochastic terminal liability. We solve the optimal investment problem using the optimal martingale principle. The equilibrium is characterized by a mean field BSDE whose driver has quadratic growth in both the stochastic integrands and their conditional expectations. We prove the existence of solutions and show that the risk premium clears the market in the large population limit. Second, we extend the model to include consumption and habit formation, relaxing the time-separability assumption of utility functions. A similar mean field BSDE is derived, and its well-posedness and asymptotic behavior are examined. We also introduce an exponential quadratic Gaussian (EQG) reformulation to obtain equilibrium solutions in semi-analytic form. Finally, the model is extended to partially observable markets where agents must infer the risk premium from stock price observations to determine trading strategies. We provide semi-analytic expressions for the equilibrium via the EQG framework, and the equilibrium risk-premium process is constructed endogenously using Kalman-Bucy filtering theory. Numerical simulations are included to visualize the resulting market dynamics.2026-03-23T14:54:40ZDoctoral Dissertation. 167 pages, 5 figuresMasashi Sekinehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20580v1Outperforming a Benchmark with $α$-Bregman Wasserstein divergence2026-03-21T00:28:10ZWe consider the problem of active portfolio management, where an investor seeks the portfolio with maximal expected utility of the difference between the terminal wealth of their strategy and a proportion of the benchmark's, subject to a budget and a deviation constraint from the benchmark portfolio. As the investor aims at outperforming the benchmark, they choose a divergence that asymmetrically penalises gains and losses as well as penalises underperforming the benchmark more than outperforming it. This is achieved by the recently introduced $α$-Bregman-Wasserstein divergence, subsuming the Bregman-Wasserstein and the popular Wasserstein divergence. We prove existence and uniqueness, characterise the optimal portfolio strategy, and give explicit conditions when the divergence constraints and the budget constraints are binding. We conclude with a numerical illustration of the optimal quantile function in a geometric Brownian motion market model.2026-03-21T00:28:10ZSilvana M. PesentiThai Nguyenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19716v1Optimal Hedge Ratio for Delta-Neutral Liquidity Provision under Liquidation Constraints2026-03-20T07:47:03ZWe study the problem of optimally hedging the price exposure of liquidity positions in constant-product automated market makers (AMMs) when the hedge is funded by collateralized borrowing. A liquidity provider (LP) who borrows tokens to construct a delta-neutral position faces a trade-off: higher hedge ratios reduce price exposure but increase liquidation risk through tighter collateral utilization. We model token prices as correlated geometric Brownian motions and derive the hedge ratio h that maximizes risk-adjusted return subject to a liquidation-probability constraint expressed via a first-passage-time bound. The unconstrained optimum h* admits a closed-form expression, but at h* the liquidation probability is prohibitively high. The practical optimum h** = min(h*, h_bar(alpha)) is determined by the binding liquidation constraint h_bar(alpha), which we evaluate analytically via the first-passage-time formula and confirm with Monte Carlo simulation. Simulations calibrated to on-chain data validate the analytical results, demonstrate robustness across realistic parameter ranges, and show that the optimal hedge ratio lies between 50% and 70% for typical DeFi lending conditions. Practical guidelines for rebalancing frequency and position sizing are also provided.2026-03-20T07:47:03Z26 pages, 4 figuresAtsushi Hanehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20319v1Implementation Risk in Portfolio Backtesting: A Previously Unquantified Source of Error2026-03-19T23:28:29ZPortfolio backtesting is the primary tool for evaluating investment strategies before deployment, yet practitioners implicitly assume that different engines produce identical results for the same strategy. we formalise implementation risk, the systematic divergence in backtested portfolio metrics arising solely from differences in how engines implement the same logical strategy, and propose four metrics grounded in metrology to quantify it: engine sensitivity, implementation uncertainty interval, divergence amplification factor, and conclusion stability index. we execute 15 benchmark strategies through five independent open-source engines on 30 non-overlapping stratified asset buckets comprising 180 s&p 500 stocks under four transaction-cost regimes. at zero cost, all five engines agree exactly (maximum divergence 0.000%), isolating transaction-cost implementation as the sole source of disagreement. under nonzero costs, divergence is structured and predictable (spearman rho = 0.93 with cost intensity), remaining below 0.75 percentage points for most strategies but reaching 3.71% for high-turnover rotation strategies. source-code forensics uncovered seven previously undocumented defects across three engines, abstracted into a five-category failure-mode taxonomy. all engines agree on the sign of every performance metric (conclusion stability index = 1), so implementation risk does not alter investment decisions for the strategies studied but introduces measurable ambiguity in performance attribution. code and benchmark data are publicly available.2026-03-19T23:28:29ZSubmitted to Financial Innovation. 8 sections, 2 appendices, 24 figures, 10 tablesDong YinTakeshi MikiVladislav LesnichenkoVasyl Guralhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2406.20063v4Optimal consumption under loss-averse multiplicative habit-formation preferences2026-03-19T19:11:26ZThis paper studies a loss-averse version of the multiplicative habit formation preference and the corresponding optimal investment and consumption strategies over an infinite horizon. The agent's consumption preference is depicted by a general S-shaped utility function of her consumption-to-habit ratio. By considering the concave envelope of the S-shaped utility and the associated dual value function, we provide a thorough analysis of the HJB equation for the concavified problem via studying a related nonlinear free boundary problem. Based on established properties of the solution to this free boundary problem, we obtain the optimal consumption and investment policies in feedback form. Some new and technical verification arguments are developed to cope with generality of the utility function. The equivalence between the original problem and the concavified problem readily follows from the structure of the feedback controls. We also discuss some quantitative properties of the optimal policies, complemented by illustrative numerical examples and their financial implications.2024-06-28T17:21:40Z43 pages, 10 figuresBahman AngoshtariXiang YuFengyi Yuanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17692v1Can Blindfolded LLMs Still Trade? An Anonymization-First Framework for Portfolio Optimization2026-03-18T13:09:11ZFor LLM trading agents to be genuinely trustworthy, they must demonstrate understanding of market dynamics rather than exploitation of memorized ticker associations. Building responsible multi-agent systems demands rigorous signal validation: proving that predictions reflect legitimate patterns, not pre-trained recall. We address two sources of spurious performance: memorization bias from ticker-specific pre-training, and survivorship bias from flawed backtesting. Our approach is to blindfold the agents--anonymizing all identifiers--and verify whether meaningful signals persist. BlindTrade anonymizes tickers and company names, and four LLM agents output scores along with reasoning. We construct a GNN graph from reasoning embeddings and trade using PPO-DSR policy. On 2025 YTD (through 2025-08-01), we achieved Sharpe 1.40 +/- 0.22 across 20 seeds and validated signal legitimacy through negative control experiments. To assess robustness beyond a single OOS window, we additionally evaluate an extended period (2024--2025), revealing market-regime dependency: the policy excels in volatile conditions but shows reduced alpha in trending bull markets.2026-03-18T13:09:11ZAccepted at the ICLR 2026 Workshop on Advances in Financial AI (FinAI). 18 pages, 7 figuresJoohyoung JeonHongchul Leehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15947v1Hyper-Adaptive Momentum Dynamics for Native Cubic Portfolio Optimization: Avoiding Quadratization Distortion in Higher-Order Cardinality-Constrained Search2026-03-16T21:53:00ZWe study cubic cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization, a higher-order extension of the standard Markowitz formulation where three-way sector co-movement terms augment the quadratic risk-return objective. Classical heuristics like simulated annealing (SA) and tabu search require Rosenberg quadratization of these cubic interactions. This inflates the variable count from n to 5n and introduces penalty terms that substantially distort the augmented search landscape. In contrast, Hyper-Adaptive Momentum Dynamics (HAMD) operates directly on the native higher-order objective using a hybrid pipeline combining continuous Hamiltonian search, exact cardinality-preserving projection, and iterated local search (ILS). On a cubic portfolio benchmark under matched 60-second CPU budgets, HAMD achieves substantially lower decoded native cubic objective values than SA and tabu search, yielding single-seed relative improvements of 87.9%, 71.2%, 59.5%, and 46.9% at n = 200, 300, 500, and 1000. In a detailed three-seed study at n = 200, HAMD attains a median native objective of 195.65 (zero variance), while SA and tabu yield 1208.07. Decoded-feasibility analysis shows SA satisfies all exact cardinality and Rosenberg auxiliary constraints, yet decodes to a native objective 80-88% worse than HAMD, demonstrating a surrogate-distortion effect rather than simple infeasibility. Exact calibration on small instances (n = 20, 25, 30) confirms HAMD finds the provably global optimum in 9/9 trials. These results demonstrate that native higher-order search offers a substantial advantage over quadratized surrogate optimization for constrained cubic portfolio problems.2026-03-16T21:53:00Z15 pages, 0 figures, 10 tables. Reference implementation and benchmark reproduction scripts available at: https://github.com/symplectic-opt/hamd-communityGreg Serbarinovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15511v1Some general results on risk budgeting portfolios2026-03-16T16:38:17ZGiven a reference risk measure, the risk budgeting is the portfolio where each asset contributes a predetermined amount to the total risk. We propose a novel approach, alternative to the ones proposed in the literature, for the calculation of the risk budgeting portfolio. This different perspective on the problem has several interesting consequences. For the calculation of the portfolio, we define a Cauchy sequence within the simplex of R^n, whose limit corresponds to the risk budgeting portfolio. This construction allows for the straightforward implementation of an efficient algorithm, avoiding the need to solve auxiliary, equivalent optimization problems, which may be computationally challenging and hard to interpret in the decision theory context. We compare our algorithm with the standard optimization-based methods proposed in the literature. From a theoretical point of view, starting from the Cauchy sequence, we define a function for which the risk budgeting portfolio is a fixed point. Therefore, sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the fixed point can be used. The methodology is developed for general risk measures and implemented in detail in the case of standard deviation.2026-03-16T16:38:17Z33 pagesClaudia FassinoPierpaolo Ubertihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20434v2Market-Implied Sustainability: Insights from Funds' Portfolio Holdings2026-03-16T10:32:38ZIn this work we propose a framework to construct Market-Implied Sustainability (MIS) scores for individual firms by exploiting fund-level sustainability classifications and granular portfolio holdings. The central idea is that the relative over/under-representation of a stock in sustainability-oriented funds reveals a market-based assessment of its sustainability profile. We implement the methodology in the European context using the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), considering Article 9 (``dark green'') funds as the sustainability-oriented segment and comparing their portfolio compositions to those of other funds.
We compute MIS scores for a large cross-section of European companies over the period 2010--2025. We then examine how MIS relates to traditional firm-level ESG ratings provided by LSEG and analyze the determinants of potential divergences between the two measures. Finally, we assess the economic relevance of MIS through portfolio-tilting strategies, ranging from rule-based reallocations to constrained optimal allocation frameworks.
The results show that MIS scores capture dimensions of sustainability that differ systematically from conventional ESG ratings. In portfolio applications, tilting toward firms with high MIS scores improves risk-adjusted performance, whereas strategies based solely on ESG ratings do not deliver comparable gains. Overall, the findings suggest that market-implied sustainability measures provide complementary information to fundamentals-based ESG metrics and have practical relevance for asset allocation and regulatory monitoring.2025-10-23T11:12:14ZRosella GiacomettiGabriele TorriMarco BonomelliDavide Lauriahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12598v2Continuous-time Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning via Quadratic Variation Penalty2026-03-15T13:09:41ZThis paper studies continuous-time risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RL) under the entropy-regularized, exploratory diffusion process formulation with the exponential-form objective. The risk-sensitive objective arises either as the agent's risk attitude or as a distributionally robust approach against the model uncertainty. Owing to the martingale perspective in Jia and Zhou (J Mach Learn Res 24(161): 1--61, 2023) the risk-sensitive RL problem is shown to be equivalent to ensuring the martingale property of a process involving both the value function and the q-function, augmented by an additional penalty term: the quadratic variation of the value process, capturing the variability of the value-to-go along the trajectory. This characterization allows for the straightforward adaptation of existing RL algorithms developed for non-risk-sensitive scenarios to incorporate risk sensitivity by adding the realized variance of the value process. Additionally, I highlight that the conventional policy gradient representation is inadequate for risk-sensitive problems due to the nonlinear nature of quadratic variation; however, q-learning offers a solution and extends to infinite horizon settings. Finally, I prove the convergence of the proposed algorithm for Merton's investment problem and quantify the impact of temperature parameter on the behavior of the learning procedure. I also conduct simulation experiments to demonstrate how risk-sensitive RL improves the finite-sample performance in the linear-quadratic control problem.2024-04-19T03:05:41Z54 pages, 2 figures, 1 tableYanwei Jiahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13581v1Single-Event Multinomial Full Kelly via Implicit State Positions2026-03-13T20:44:52ZFor a single event with finitely many mutually exclusive outcomes, the full Kelly problem is to maximize expected log wealth over nonnegative stakes together with an optional cash position. The optimal formula is classical, but the support-selection step is often presented via Lagrange multipliers. This note gives a shorter state-price derivation. A cash fraction $c$ acts as an implicit position in every outcome: in terminal-wealth terms, it is equivalent to a baseline stake $cq_i$ on outcome $i$, where $q_i$ is the state price. On any active support, explicit bets therefore only top up favorable outcomes from this baseline $cq_i$ to the optimal total stake $p_i$. This yields the formula $x_i = (p_i - c q_i)_+$, the threshold rule $p_i/q_i > c$, and, after sorting outcomes by $p_i/q_i$, a one-pass greedy algorithm for support selection. The result is standard in substance, but the implicit-position viewpoint gives a compact proof and a convenient way to remember the solution.2026-03-13T20:44:52Z7 pages, no figuresChristopher D. Longhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00299v2Stochastic Dominance Constrained Optimization with S-shaped Utilities: Poor-Performance-Region Algorithm and Neural Network2026-03-13T14:36:05ZWe investigate the static portfolio selection problem of S-shaped and non-concave utility maximization under first-order and second-order stochastic dominance (SD) constraints. In many S-shaped utility optimization problems, one should require a liquidation boundary to guarantee the existence of a finite concave envelope function. A first-order SD (FSD) constraint can replace this requirement and provide an alternative for risk management. We explicitly solve the optimal solution under a general S-shaped utility function with a first-order stochastic dominance constraint. However, the second-order SD (SSD) constrained problem under non-concave utilities is difficult to solve analytically due to the invalidity of Sion's maxmin theorem. For this sake, we propose a numerical algorithm to obtain a plausible and sub-optimal solution for general non-concave utilities. The key idea is to detect the poor performance region with respect to the SSD constraints, characterize its structure and modify the distribution on that region to obtain (sub-)optimality. A key financial insight is that the decision maker should follow the SD constraint on the poor performance scenario while conducting the unconstrained optimal strategy otherwise. We provide numerical experiments to show that our algorithm effectively finds a sub-optimal solution in many cases. Finally, we develop an algorithm-guided piecewise-neural-network framework to learn the solution of the SSD problem, which demonstrates accelerated convergence compared to standard neural network approaches.2025-11-29T03:41:35Z30 pagesZeyun HuYang Liuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05169v2Onflow: a model free, online portfolio allocation algorithm robust to transaction fees2026-03-11T19:55:11ZWe introduce Onflow, a reinforcement learning method for optimizing portfolio allocation via gradient flows. Our approach dynamically adjusts portfolio allocations to maximize expected log returns while accounting for transaction costs. Using a softmax parameterization, Onflow updates allocations through an ordinary differential equation derived from gradient flow methods. This algorithm belongs to the large class of stochastic optimization procedures; we measure its efficiency by comparing our results to the mathematical theoretical values in a log-normal framework and to standard benchmarks from the 'old NYSE' dataset.
For log-normal assets with zero transaction costs, Onflow replicates Markowitz optimal portfolio, achieving the best possible allocation. Numerical experiments from the 'old NYSE' dataset show that Onflow leads to dynamic asset allocation strategies whose performances are: a) comparable to benchmark strategies such as Cover's Universal Portfolio or Helmbold et al. ``multiplicative updates'' approach when transaction costs are zero, and b) better than previous procedures when transaction costs are high. Onflow can even remain efficient in regimes where other dynamical allocation techniques do not work anymore.
Onflow is a promising portfolio management strategy that relies solely on observed prices, requiring no assumptions about asset return distributions. This makes it robust against model risk, offering a practical solution for real-world trading strategies.2023-12-08T16:49:19ZGabriel TuriniciPierre Brugierehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22858v2From Binary Screens to Continuous Compliance: A Shariah Screening Measure for Portfolio Design2026-03-11T01:53:24ZIslamic equity screening relies on multiple binary rulebooks that often classify the same firm differently. This paper develops a Continuous Shariah Compliance Index (CSCI) on $[0,1]$ that embeds the published business-activity and financial-ratio thresholds of six leading standards in a single transparent measure. Using CRSP/Compustat U.S. equities from 1999-2024 with lagged accounting inputs and monthly portfolio formation, we document four results. First, existing binary standards map to distinct regions of a common compliance scale, so firms that receive the same pass/fail label can still differ materially in compliance strength. Second, CSCI-threshold portfolios provide a transparent way to vary compliance intensity while retaining economically meaningful diversification, although baseline risk-adjusted performance declines modestly as thresholds tighten. Third, the September 2023 DJIM/S&P methodology change admits firms with materially lower CSCI scores than firms that remained compliant under both the old and new rules. Fourth, in cross-sectional return tests, CSCI is not reliably associated with higher expected returns once standard characteristics are controlled for. The main contribution of CSCI is therefore measurement and portfolio design rather than the discovery of a new priced factor.2025-12-28T10:04:53Z28 pages, 8 figures, 11 tables. CRSP/Compustat U.S. equities 1999-2024Abdulrahman QadiAkash SharmaFrancesca Meddahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09966v1Caratheodory II: The Geometry of Financial Irreversibility2026-03-10T17:57:19ZIn quantum mechanics and finance, numeraire invariance - the unobservability of absolute phase or price scale - fits with a projective and curved state space. This projective geometry has a measurable signature. For spin-one and higher spin systems, the Taylor expansion of directed distance contains a non-zero cubic term, which induces a fundamental asymmetry under the exchange of states. The Second Law, the failure of Maxwell's demon, and the limitations of sequential traders can all be reduced to this asymmetry.2026-03-10T17:57:19Z6 pagesBernhard K Meister