https://arxiv.org/api/PrwgexYj3K2yo0hk4fEp3izLmVk 2026-03-18T10:25:10Z 2295 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09006v1 2026-03-09T22:50:50Z

We develop spectral portfolio theory by establishing a direct identification: neural network weight matrices trained on stochastic processes are portfolio allocation matrices, and their spectral structure encodes factor decompositions and wealth concentration patterns. The three forces governing stochastic gradient descent (SGD) -- gradient signal, dimensional regularisation, and eigenvalue repulsion -- translate directly into portfolio dynamics: smart money, survival constraint, and endogenous diversification. The spectral properties of SGD weight matrices transition from Marchenko-Pastur statistics (additive regime, short horizon) to inverse-Wishart via the free log-normal (multiplicative regime, long horizon), mirroring the transition from daily returns to long-run wealth compounding. We unify the cross-sectional wealth dynamics of Bouchaud and Mezard (2000), the within-portfolio dynamics of Olsen et al. (2025), and the scalar Fokker-Planck framework via a common spectral foundation. A central result is the Spectral Invariance Theorem: any isotropic perturbation to the portfolio objective preserves the singular-value distribution up to scale and shift, while anisotropic perturbations produce spectral distortion proportional to their cross-asset variance. We develop applications to portfolio design, wealth inequality measurement, tax policy, and neural network diagnostics. In the tax context, the invariance result recovers and generalises the neutrality conditions of Frøseth (2026).

2026-03-09T22:50:50Z 27 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables Anders G Frøseth http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08553v1 2026-03-09T16:16:59Z

We propose Generative Adversarial Regression (GAR), a framework for learning conditional risk scenarios through generators aligned with downstream risk objectives. GAR builds on a regression characterization of conditional risk for elicitable functionals, including quantiles, expectiles, and jointly elicitable pairs. We extend this principle from point prediction to generative modeling by training generators whose policy-induced risk matches that of real data under the same context. To ensure robustness across all policies, GAR adopts a minimax formulation in which an adversarial policy identifies worst-case discrepancies in risk evaluation while the generator adapts to eliminate them. This structure preserves alignment with the risk functional across a broad class of policies rather than a fixed, pre-specified set. We illustrate GAR through a tail-risk instantiation based on jointly elicitable $(\mathrm{VaR}, \mathrm{ES})$ objectives. Experiments on S\&P 500 data show that GAR produces scenarios that better preserve downstream risk than unconditional, econometric, and direct predictive baselines while remaining stable under adversarially selected policies.

2026-03-09T16:16:59Z Saeed Asadi Jonathan Yu-Meng Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08552v1 2026-03-09T16:16:25Z

We study continuous-time portfolio choice with nonlinear payoffs under smooth ambiguity and Bayesian learning. We develop a general framework for dynamic, non-concave asset allocation that accommodates nonlinear payoffs, broad utility classes, and flexible ambiguity attitudes. Dynamic consistency is obtained by a robust representation that recasts the ambiguity-averse problem as ambiguity-neutral with distorted priors. This structure delivers explicit trading rules by combining nonlinear filtering with the martingale approach and nests standard concave and linear-payoff benchmarks. As a leading application, delegated management with convex incentives illustrates that ambiguity aversion shifts beliefs toward adverse states, limits the range of states that would otherwise trigger more aggressive risk taking, and reduces volatility through lower risky exposure.

2026-03-09T16:16:25Z 36 pages, 8 figures Emanuele Borgonovo An Chen Massimo Marinacci Shihao Zhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07881v1 2026-03-09T01:35:17Z

Funds at large portfolio management firms may consist of many portfolio managers (PMs), each managing a portion of the fund and optimizing a distinct objective. Although the PMs determine their trades independently, the trade lists may be netted and executed by the firm. These net trades may be sufficiently large to impact the market prices, so the PMs may realize prices on their trades that are different from the observed midpoint price of the assets before execution. These transaction costs generally reduce the returns of a portfolio over time. We propose a simple protocol, based on methods from distributed convex optimization, by which a firm can communicate estimated transaction costs to its PMs, and the PMs can potentially revise their trades to realize reduced transaction costs. This protocol does not require the PMs to disclose their method of determining trades to the firm or to each other, nor does it require the PMs to communicate their trade lists with each other. As the number of adjustment rounds grows, the trades converge to the ones that are optimal for the firm. As a practical matter we observe that even just a few rounds of adjustment lead to substantial savings for the firm and the PMs.

2026-03-09T01:35:17Z 28 pages, 4 figures Nikhil Devanathan Logan Bell Dylan Rueter Stephen Boyd http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07692v1 2026-03-08T15:47:09Z

For a covariance matrix coming from a factor model of returns, we investigate the relationship between the long-only global minimum variance portfolio and the asset exposures to the factors. In the case of a 1-factor model, we provide a rigorous and explicit description of the long-only solution in terms of the parameters of the covariance matrix. For $q>1$ factors, we provide a description of the long-only portfolio in geometric terms. The results are illustrated with empirical daily returns of US stocks.

2026-03-08T15:47:09Z 25 pages, 6 figures Nick L. Gunther Alec N. Kercheval Ololade Sowunmi http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02455v2 2026-03-06T22:36:35Z

Parametric portfolio policies may experience estimation risk. I develop a generalized Bayesian framework that updates priors, delivering a posterior distribution over characteristic tilts and out-of-sample returns that is the unique belief-updating rule consistent with the investor's utility function, requiring no model for the return generating process. The Gibbs posterior is the closest distribution to the prior in Kullback-Leibler divergence subject to utility maximization. The posterior's scaling parameter $λ$ controls the weight placed on data relative to the prior. I develop a KNEEDLE algorithm to select optimal $λ^*$ in-sample by trading off posterior precision against numerical fragility, eliminating the need for out-of-sample validation. I apply this to U.S. equities (1955-2024), and confirm characteristic-based gains concentrate pre-2000. I find that $λ^*$ varies meaningfully with risk aversion and depends on higher-order moments.

2026-03-02T22:54:55Z Christopher G. Lamoureux http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15652v1 2026-03-06T09:53:33Z

This paper makes the Millennium Prize problem P vs NP operational in quantitative finance by studying cardinality-constrained portfolio selection. Starting from the convex Markowitz mean-variance program with CAPM-based expected returns (Rf plus beta times ERP), we impose a hard sparsity rule that limits the portfolio to K assets out of approximately 94 industry portfolios (Damodaran). The constraint couples discrete subset selection with continuous weight optimization, yielding a mixed-integer quadratic program and an NP-hard search space that grows combinatorially with n and K. We therefore evaluate scalable approximation schemes (greedy screening, Monte Carlo sampling, and genetic algorithms) under a replication-oriented protocol with random-seed control, distributional performance summaries (median and quantiles), runtime profiling, and convergence diagnostics. Dependence structure is documented via correlation and covariance diagnostics and positive-semidefinite checks to link algorithm behavior to the geometry implied by the risk matrix. To support the title's derivatives component, we add a European call option priced by the Black-Scholes model and map it into CAPM-consistent moments using delta-based linearization, validated with a bump test and moneyness/maturity sensitivity. Results highlight how the cardinality constraint reshapes the attainable efficient frontier, why stability and computational-cost trade-offs matter more than single-best runs, and how common-factor dependence can limit diversification in K-sparse solutions. The study provides a reproducible template for NP-hard portfolio optimization with transparent inputs and extensible derivative overlays.

2026-03-06T09:53:33Z Working paper (preprint). Uses ~94 Damodaran industry portfolios to study cardinality-constrained Markowitz-CAPM portfolio optimization (MIQP/NP-hard) with Monte Carlo and genetic algorithm approximations. Includes correlation/covariance diagnostics, efficient frontier and Sharpe summaries, runtime/seed reproducibility, and a Black-Scholes option overlay with a delta bump-test check Davit Gondauri http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08272v3 2026-03-06T08:56:01Z

Monotone mean-variance (MMV) utility is the minimal modification of the classical Markowitz utility that respects rational ordering of investment opportunities. This paper provides, for the first time, a complete characterization of optimal dynamic portfolio choice for the MMV utility in asset price models with independent returns. The task is performed under minimal assumptions, weaker than the existence of an equivalent martingale measure and with no restrictions on the moments of asset returns. We interpret the maximal MMV utility in terms of the monotone Sharpe ratio (MSR) and show that the global squared MSR arises as the nominal yield from continuously compounding at the rate equal to the maximal local squared MSR. The paper gives simple necessary and sufficient conditions for mean-variance (MV) efficient portfolios to be MMV efficient. Several illustrative examples contrasting the MV and MMV criteria are provided.

2025-03-11T10:40:48Z 39 pages, 1 figure Aleš Černý Johannes Ruf Martin Schweizer http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05283v1 2026-03-05T15:28:27Z

We reformulate the neutral wealth tax framework of Froeseth (2026) in the language of stochastic dynamics and statistical physics. Individual wealth under geometric Brownian motion satisfies a Langevin equation with multiplicative noise; the probability density of wealth across a population then evolves according to a Fokker-Planck equation. A proportional wealth tax at market value enters as a uniform reduction of the drift coefficient, preserving the diffusion structure and all relative probability currents. This drift-shift symmetry is the physical content of tax neutrality. Each channel through which neutrality breaks down in practice, book-value assessment, liquidity frictions, forced dividend extraction, migration, and market impact, corresponds to a specific violation of this symmetry: a state-dependent, asset-dependent, or flow-dependent modification of the Fokker-Planck equation. The framework clarifies when wealth taxation is a benign rescaling of the dynamics and when it introduces genuinely new physics.

2026-03-05T15:28:27Z 35 pages, 4 figures Anders G. Froeseth http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05277v1 2026-03-05T15:22:58Z

Froeseth (2026) shows that a proportional wealth tax on market values is neutral with respect to portfolio choice, Sharpe ratios, and equilibrium prices under CRRA preferences and geometric Brownian motion. This paper investigates the robustness of that result along two dimensions. First, we extend the neutrality frontier: portfolio neutrality, including all intertemporal hedging demands, is preserved under stochastic volatility (Heston and general Markov diffusions) and Epstein-Zin recursive utility, but breaks under non-homothetic preferences such as HARA. Second, we identify four channels through which implemented wealth taxes depart from neutrality even under CRRA: non-uniform assessment across asset classes, general equilibrium price effects in inelastic markets, progressive threshold structures, and endogenous labour supply. Each channel is formalised and, where possible, calibrated to the Norwegian wealth tax system. The progressive threshold introduces a tax shield that increases risk-taking near the exemption boundary, an effect opposite in sign to the HARA distortion, and, at the extreme, generates a participation margin at which investors exit the tax jurisdiction entirely. We formalise this tax-induced migration as the extreme response at the progressive threshold and examine the Norwegian post-2022 experience as a case study. The full framework is applied to evaluate the Saez-Zucman proposal for a global minimum wealth tax on billionaires and the related French proposal for a national minimum tax above EUR 100 million.

2026-03-05T15:22:58Z Anders G. Froeseth http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05264v1 2026-03-05T15:15:15Z

We analyse the effect of a proportional wealth tax on asset returns, portfolio choice, and asset pricing. The tax is levied annually on the market value of all holdings at a uniform rate. We show that such a tax is economically equivalent to the government acquiring a proportional stake in the investor's portfolio each period, a form of risk sharing in which expected wealth and risk are reduced by the same factor, while the return per share is unaffected. This multiplicative separability drives four main results: (i) the coefficient of variation of wealth is invariant to the tax rate; (ii) optimal portfolio weights are independent of the tax rate; (iii) the wealth tax is orthogonal to portfolio choice, inducing a homothetic contraction of the opportunity set that preserves the Sharpe ratio of every portfolio; (iv) taxed and untaxed investors price assets identically. Results are derived under geometric Brownian motion and generalised to the location-scale family. A Modigliani-Miller analysis confirms pricing neutrality and identifies an inconsistency in the literature regarding the discount rate for after-tax cash flows. Under CAPM with CRRA preferences, after-tax betas equal pre-tax betas and the security market line contracts by the tax factor; general-equilibrium prices are unchanged. This resolves an error in Fama (2021). The neutrality results depend on three conditions commonly violated in practice: universal taxation at market value, frictionless markets, and dividend consumption. We formalise three channels through which relaxing these conditions breaks neutrality: book-value taxation, liquidity frictions, and dividend extraction, and show they have opposing effects on asset prices.

2026-03-05T15:15:15Z 48 pages, 10 figures Anders G. Froeseth http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.13057v3 2026-03-04T22:15:17Z

We provide a general HJM framework for forward contracts written on abstract market indices with arbitrary fixing and payment adjustments, and featuring collateralization in any currency denominations. In view of this, we first provide a thorough study of cross-currency markets in the presence of collateral and incompleteness. Then we give a general treatment of collateral dislocations by describing the instantaneous cross-currency basis spreads by means of HJM models, for which we derive appropriate drift conditions. The framework obtained allows us to simultaneously cover forward-looking risky IBOR rates, such as EURIBOR, and backward-looking rates based on overnight rates, such as SOFR. Due to the discrepancies in market conventions of different currency areas created by the benchmark transition, this is pivotal for describing portfolios of interest-rate products that are denominated in multiple currencies. As an example of contract simultaneously depending on all the risk factors that we describe within our framework, we treat cross-currency swaps using our proposed abstract indices.

2023-12-20T14:31:49Z 54 pages, 3 figures Alessandro Gnoatto Silvia Lavagnini http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01393v2 2026-03-04T02:58:52Z

This paper introduces a reinforcement learning framework that employs Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) to dynamically optimize the weights of multiple large language model (LLM)-generated formulaic alphas for stock trading strategies. Formulaic alphas are mathematically defined trading signals derived from price, volume, sentiment, and other data. Although recent studies have shown that LLMs can generate diverse and effective alphas, a critical challenge lies in how to adaptively integrate them under varying market conditions. To address this gap, we leverage a DeepSeek model to generate fifty alphas for ten stocks, and then use PPO to adjust their weights in real time. Experimental results indicate that the PPO-optimized strategy does not consistently deliver the highest cumulative returns across all stocks, but it achieves comparatively higher Sharpe ratios and smaller maximum drawdowns in most cases. When compared with baseline strategies, including equal-weighted, buy-and-hold, random entry/exit, and momentum approaches, PPO demonstrates more stable risk-adjusted performance. The findings highlight the importance of reinforcement learning in the allocation of alpha weights and show the potential of combining LLM-generated signals with adaptive optimization for robust financial forecasting and trading.

2025-09-01T11:39:54Z This paper has been accepted by International Journal of Data Science and Analytics Qizhao Chen Hiroaki Kawashima http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03213v1 2026-03-03T18:06:56Z

The Total Portfolio Approach and Strategic Asset Allocation are widely viewed as competing frameworks for institutional portfolio management. We argue they differ in a single governance parameter: the tracking error constraint. Using U.S. equity and bond data from 2000 to 2026, with portfolio simulations spanning 2004 to 2026, we show that Sharpe ratios are statistically indistinguishable across the full constraint spectrum while the volatility of realized tracking error varies approximately 12-fold. The cost of constraints spikes during crises, when forward returns are richest and governance pressure to de-risk is strongest. Dynamic tracking error subsumes both approaches and provides boards with a more productive framework for investment governance.

2026-03-03T18:06:56Z 56 pages, 7 exhibits Ashwin Alankar Allan Maymin Philip Maymin Myron Scholes Sujiang Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01298v1 2026-03-01T22:03:27Z

This paper introduces methodologies for constructing an index composed of a risky asset and a risk-free asset that achieves a fixed target volatility. We propose a simple proportional-control-based approach for setting the index weights, and we demonstrate in simulation that this method is more effective at consistently achieving the target volatility than an open-loop approach. We additionally present a modification to our proportional control approach that reduces index drawdowns in simulation.

2026-03-01T22:03:27Z 11 pages, 4 figures Nikhil Devanathan Dylan Rueter Stephen Boyd Emmanuel Candès Trevor Hastie Mykel J. Kochenderfer Arpit Apoorv David Soronow Igor Zamkovsky