https://arxiv.org/api/PrwgexYj3K2yo0hk4fEp3izLmVk 2026-07-20T04:40:04Z 2409 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06702v1 2026-07-07T18:20:45Z

When a portfolio is conditioned on a minimal set of observable drivers under which its assets become mutually independent over the investment horizon, the dynamic investment problem acquires a distinctive geometric structure. We study continuous-time portfolio choice in this setting. The conditioning representation, rather than the asset vector, becomes the natural state of the problem, and it moves: the sensitivity of returns to the drivers depends on the state, the conditioning set may itself change over time, and the induced information geometry both rotates and, at discrete instants, jumps. The optimal policy separates into a static component that allocates along the conditioning geometry at each instant and an intertemporal component that hedges the predictable motion of that geometry, a first-order effect in the model rather than a refinement, placing the coordinates of the information geometry in the role played by exogenous state variables in classical intertemporal asset pricing. Because the problem is organized by the drivers, its computational cost is governed by their number rather than by the number of assets. Changes in the conditioning set generate a risk that continuous trading cannot span, so the market is incomplete in the direction of its own geometry. The analysis is carried out in a controlled diffusion model, and the resulting structure is illustrated on synthetic economies designed to isolate each mechanism.

2026-07-07T18:20:45Z 31 Pages, 13 Figures, 4 Tables Alejandro Rodriguez Dominguez http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06153v1 2026-07-07T11:31:37Z

A proportional wealth tax acts as a uniform gravitational field on the wealth distribution: it shifts the drift of the Fokker-Planck equation without altering the diffusion, preserving the Gini coefficient at all finite times. The same drift-shift symmetry that makes the tax non-distortionary also makes it non-redistributive through the market channel. Redistribution requires breaking this symmetry. A progressive tax (confining potential) replaces the Pareto steady state with a thinner-tailed distribution whose Gini is a closed-form function of the progressivity parameter; source-sink terms (tax-funded transfers) reshape the density directly. We formulate optimal redistribution as a control problem for the Fokker-Planck equation, penalising intervention costs including migration, evasion, and portfolio distortion. In general equilibrium the tax design feeds back through aggregate capital and the production function, yielding a self-consistent McKean-Vlasov equation with diminishing returns to progressivity. The spectral gap of the Fokker-Planck operator determines convergence speed: progressive taxes redistribute within policy-relevant timescales, whereas proportional taxes rely on slow demographic turnover.

2026-07-07T11:31:37Z 28 pages, 1 figure, 1 table. Companion paper to arXiv:2603.05264, arXiv:2603.05277, and arXiv:2603.05283 Anders G Frøseth http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06117v1 2026-07-07T10:26:55Z

This paper studies Relief-Gated Relative Rotation (RGRR), a two-ETF rule that allocates between QQQ and DIA by mapping screened relative and macro states into a continuous QQQ weight. RGRR is economic rather than mechanical: it rotates between a growth-heavy sleeve and a Dow/value-heavy sleeve only when QQQ-DIA relative states are confirmed by rate, volatility, credit, or broad-market relief conditions. Candidate main effects and interactions are globally screened with horizon-specific HAC regressions and correlation de-duplication, then held fixed during walk-forward validation. Rolling out-of-sample validation re-selects only signal-family lambdas, not the signal universe or the position mapping. The final stack contains one main effect, nine second-order interactions, and two third-order interactions. Third-order terms must also improve rolling out-of-sample Sharpe versus the main plus second-order base and survive economic-family de-duplication. The final mapping uses a fixed bounded weight transformation and includes a 10 bps one-way turnover cost. Across the 2018, 2020, and 2022 out-of-sample starts, RGRR improves Sharpe versus 100% QQQ and 50/50 QQQ-DIA in every tested interval. It improves CAGR versus 50/50 in every interval, but beats 100% QQQ on CAGR only in the 2022 window. In 2018, RGRR earns an 18.33% CAGR and 0.94 Sharpe, versus 20.50% and 0.89 for QQQ and 16.69% and 0.86 for 50/50. In 2022, it earns a 15.19% CAGR and 0.87 Sharpe, versus 14.65% and 0.70 for QQQ. The evidence supports RGRR as a risk-adjusted relative allocation rule, not a pure return-dominance rule. Its main practical weakness is high turnover, ranging from 354% to 506% annualized.

2026-07-07T10:26:55Z 31 pages, 11 figures, 30 tables Zheli Xiong http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05320v1 2026-07-06T16:59:25Z

We formalize a single structural condition on a portfolio problem, causal separation: conditional on the realized path of a declared set of drivers through the investment horizon, asset returns are mutually independent. From this condition we derive the complete static portfolio theory it induces. Separation forces a diagonal-plus-low-rank conditional covariance through an exact tower decomposition, with the low-rank block identified as the response to driver innovations, and the constrained mean-variance problem admits a closed-form projected Markowitz solution in which the classical information matrix is replaced by its projection onto the constraint-compatible subspace. We prove uniqueness of the minimal sufficient separator as an information set; invariance of all derived objects under separator equivalence and reparametrization of the driver state; a conditional efficient-frontier theorem; a Hansen-Jagannathan bound whose gap to the unconstrained bound is an exact quadratic form in the shadow prices of the constraint geometry; a conditioning bound showing that separation regularizes estimation through the idiosyncratic variance floor; and exact first-order sensitivity bounds under approximate separation at a certified tolerance. The causal content is stated and proved rather than assumed: under an explicit structural margin the common causes form a separator, observational data identify their realized information and no more, and causal and correlational separators of equal fit are distinguished by interventions on non-parents. Seven reproducible experiments validate the theory, with structural identities holding at machine precision, and quantify its practical content against sample, shrinkage and principal-component covariances, including robustness, intervention invariance, and scaling to thousands of assets.

2026-07-06T16:59:25Z 28 Pages, 6 Figures, 5 Tables Alejandro Rodriguez Dominguez http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14991v2 2026-07-06T16:45:59Z

We study reinforcement learning for controlled diffusion processes with unbounded continuous state spaces, bounded continuous actions, and polynomially growing rewards: settings that arise naturally in finance, economics, and operations research. To overcome the challenges of continuous and high-dimensional domains, we introduce a model-based algorithm that adaptively partitions the joint state-action space. The algorithm maintains estimators of drift, volatility, and rewards within each partition, refining the discretization whenever estimation bias exceeds statistical confidence. This adaptive scheme balances exploration and approximation, enabling efficient learning in unbounded domains. Our analysis establishes regret bounds that depend on the problem horizon, state dimension, reward growth order, and a newly defined notion of zooming dimension tailored to unbounded diffusion processes. The bounds recover existing results for bounded settings as a special case, while extending theoretical guarantees to a broader class of diffusion-type problems. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of our approach through numerical experiments, including applications to high-dimensional problems such as multi-asset mean-variance portfolio selection.

2025-12-17T00:52:19Z Hanqing Jin Renyuan Xu Yanzhao Yang http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04958v1 2026-07-06T11:42:26Z

Look-ahead bias (using information from after a decision epoch to make the decision at that epoch) is the dominant way a backtest or a machine-learning evaluation flatters a system that will disappoint in deployment. The field manages it with construct-specific recipes and empirical detectors, which are sound only channel by channel and certify nothing by their silence. We show that look-ahead-freedom is a formal property in disguise: fixing an epoch, the demand that the future not influence the present is temporal non-interference over a time-indexed information lattice. From this identification we develop a pipeline calculus separating a datum's availability from its reference time, and settle the problem's boundary. Where availability may depend on data values, look-ahead-freedom is undecidable (indeed Pi-0-1-hard): leakage is recursively enumerable but freedom is not. On the value-independent fragment (covering windowing, resampling, joins, point-in-time and vintage reads, and agentic retrieval) we give a type-and-effect system that is sound and decidable in linear time. An artifact confirms the theory: the check scales linearly, an independent oracle witnesses no leak in any accepted pipeline, and the checker catches every planted leak that differential and tiling detectors miss.

2026-07-06T11:42:26Z Submitted to ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology Xavier Fonseca http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04346v1 2026-07-05T15:04:38Z

The utility function plays a core role in portfolio selection, but its specific form is typically hard to elicit. We propose a definition of the elicited utility function and develop a preference-fitting method to obtain it. Basically, we use intuitive probability-wealth pairs to derive a fitted terminal wealth, a fitted portfolio and a fitted utility function, which converge to the optimal terminal wealth, the optimal portfolio and the elicited utility function of the investor, respectively. Specifically, we first establish a bijection between the utility functions and the terminal wealth functions, based on which we construct the fitted terminal wealth, and then obtain the fitted portfolio and the fitted utility function through the martingale-duality method. Next, we develop a piecewise hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (abbr. PHARA) utility approximation method, and verify the convergences in various senses: almost surely, $L^r$, uniform, etc. We demonstrate two applications of our method: obtaining asymptotically explicit portfolios and handling portfolio selection under Value-at-Risk (abbr. VaR) constraints, thereby illustrating its advantages including intuitiveness, analytical tractability, and ability to circumvent the Lagrange multiplier.

2026-07-05T15:04:38Z Rui Dai Zongxia Liang Yang Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03858v1 2026-07-04T12:57:40Z

We propose a multivariate generalisation of the Lo-MacKinlay (1988) variance ratio that decomposes long-horizon equity-return dynamics into separate return-channel and volatility-channel memory components across the cross-section of asset returns. The framework identifies a parsimonious five-factor model - capturing persistent, antipersistent, and multi-scale memory in returns and volatility - that fits four U.S. portfolio panels (the Fama-French 49-industry universe, its pre/post-1998 halves, and the Fama-French 100 size x book-to-market sort) and a European replication (Fama-French Europe 25), recovering seven stylised facts of long-horizon equity dynamics simultaneously across all five panels. Three findings carry economic content. (i) The same five-factor decomposition fits all five panels, indicating a cross-sectional structure robust to industry vs. size-and-value sorts, to sub-periods, and to U.S. vs. developed-European markets. (ii) U.S. equity volatility memory underwent a regime transition in the late 1980s - not at the static 1998 split-half boundary - with the slowest component of the volatility cascade lengthening from approximately two to four years; a 1000-replicate rolling-window bootstrap localises the transition with strictly non-overlapping 90% confidence bands separating pre- and post-transition windows. (iii) The cross-sectional loadings driving return-channel long memory are economically distinct from those driving volatility-channel cascade memory: a cross-channel beta-inversion test finds no panel with the positive alignment a single shared loading predicts, rejecting the shared-loading hypothesis toward anti-alignment on the two largest panels at Bonferroni p = 0.0004. Characteristics that predict return-momentum patterns therefore need not predict volatility-persistence patterns.

2026-07-04T12:57:40Z 53 pages, 5 figures, 13 tables. Main text and supplementary appendices in a single self-contained document Anders G Frøseth http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03082v1 2026-07-03T08:14:43Z

This paper examines portfolio optimization and tail-risk analytics for a heterogeneous universe of actively managed investment funds. Using daily Bloomberg data for 30 funds from 4 December 2020 to 24 December 2025, the study evaluates buy-and-hold, mean--variance, CVaR-based, and tangency-type strategies under long-only and long--short constraints. The sample consists predominantly of actively managed ETFs, with PTTRX retained as an actively managed fixed-income mutual-fund comparator. The results show substantial heterogeneity across thematic equity, fixed-income, income-oriented, multi-asset, and alternative strategies, creating both diversification opportunities and meaningful differences in volatility, drawdown behavior, downside exposure, and tail risk. Historical results indicate that tangency-type portfolios are generally the strongest competitors to the buy-and-hold benchmark in cumulative and risk-adjusted terms, while minimum-variance and CVaR-minimizing portfolios sacrifice upside participation for stronger downside control. Dynamic allocation does not improve all strategies uniformly: the long-only dynamic CVaR-95 portfolio is consistently attractive across several risk-adjusted criteria, whereas long--short dynamic tangency-CVaR portfolios perform strongly but are more sensitive to turnover and implementation costs. Tail-risk diagnostics based on empirical VaR, Expected Shortfall, maximum drawdown, left-tail Hill estimators, and POT--GPD methods show that downside tail exposure remains meaningful after portfolio aggregation. Overall, actively managed ETFs are best evaluated as components of a joint investment opportunity set in which dependence structure, portfolio design, dynamic allocation, implementation frictions, and tail-risk exposure jointly shape performance.

2026-07-03T08:14:43Z William W. Lamptey Nicholas Appiah Abootaleb Shirvani Priscilla Ati-Tay Svetlozar T. Rachev Frank J. Fabozzi http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18609v2 2026-07-03T07:57:50Z

Index trackers are important passive investments offering the return and risk of the market encapsulated by the index, the largest US index tracker was valued at $900 billion in early 2026. Using a two-stage approach of asset selection followed by estimation on S&P 500 data, we explore the role of cardinality constraints in determining the effectiveness of the tracker's reproduction of market return and risk. We compare eight pre-selection procedures: forward selection or backward elimination; implemented using ordinary least squares or least absolute deviation regression; with or without a regression constant. We show experimentally that out-of-sample tracking errors decrease according to the inverse of the square root of cardinality and out-of-sample tracking error, transaction volume and return-risk ratios all improve as the cardinality constraint is relaxed. By contrast for enhanced returns, cardinalities of the order 10 to 20 are most effective.

2025-03-24T12:06:13Z N. Meade C. A. Valle J. E. Beasley http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01550v1 2026-07-02T00:16:17Z

Systematic trend following has, on average, been profitable for at least two centuries; yet since approximately 2009, short-term trends have ceased to deliver reliable returns. Using a cross-section of roughly 100 liquid futures contracts spanning 1995-2025, together with an industry-representative CTA proxy, we document the break and characterise its dependence on signal speed and asset class. We evaluate four candidate explanations - capacity constraints, market electronification, a regime change in CTA-versus-order-flow interactions, and a microstructural mechanism - and find that the first three fail on grounds of timing, magnitude, or cross-sectional heterogeneity. Our central empirical finding is that the cross-sectional variable distinguishing degraded from surviving trends is the volatility-normalised tick size: post-2008 trend PnL has collapsed on small-tick contracts across all signal horizons, while remaining essentially intact on large-tick ones. Neither asset class nor liquidity replicates this dichotomy. We interpret this result through a self-fulfilling feedback loop that, in our view, lies at the heart of the trend anomaly itself: trend signals trigger directional trades, whose market impact reinforces the very price moves that generated the signal. Both the profitability and the persistence of trend are sustained by this impact channel, which requires that trend followers can execute aggressively at reasonable cost. We argue that the post-crisis transition to HFT-dominated market making, whose liquidity-withdrawal behaviour in front of predictable directional flow has sharply contrasting consequences for sparse (small-tick) and dense (large-tick) limit order books, has broken this loop on small-tick contracts. On large-tick contracts, residual depth remains sufficient, and the loop continues to operate.

2026-07-02T00:16:17Z 20 pages, 21 figures, 11 pages of appendices Jutta G. Kurth Zoltan Eisler Adam Rej Jean-Philippe Bouchaud http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25472v2 2026-07-01T09:13:48Z

In this work we study a continuous time exponential utility maximization problem in the presence of a linear temporary price impact. More precisely, for the case where the risky asset is given by the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck diffusion process we compute the optimal portfolio strategy and the corresponding value. Our method of solution relies on duality, and it is purely probabilistic.

2025-09-29T20:21:46Z Yan Dolinsky http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00475v1 2026-07-01T05:49:41Z

Timing-based tilts across asset classes can drive much of the risk and return of a diversified cross-asset portfolio. The standard approach forecasts returns and then optimizes weights. We instead study an end-to-end AI-based policy that maps market states directly to portfolio weights, and we then ask when this one-step modeling approach outperforms simple rules-based strategies. We train these policies on the sixteen most liquid CME futures, where an edge is unlikely to be due to illiquidity, using a differentiable Sharpe ratio loss function, and we benchmark them against equal weighting, risk parity, and time-series momentum. The learned policies rank above the rules on the pooled cross-asset portfolio and in several sub-asset classes, but not uniformly. In gross terms, an LSTM and a transformer-based architecture perform comparably out-of-sample, but diverge when we consider transaction costs. The transformer generates the stronger learned policy, trades far less than the LSTM, and matches or exceeds equal weighting through moderate cost.

2026-07-01T05:49:41Z Austin Pollok Kevin Robik http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29771v1 2026-06-29T04:26:30Z

LLM agents are increasingly cast as autonomous portfolio managers, and benchmarks have moved from financial question-answering to sequential trading. Yet most still rank agents by returns over a fixed window -- a weak proxy, since a period's return is dominated by the market path and apparent alpha can dissolve once look-ahead leakage is controlled. Such a ranking certifies neither sound reasoning, nor a consistent strategy, nor a durable edge. We introduce CLQT, which reframes closed-loop trading evaluation as diagnosis rather than ranking: an instrument that localizes where and why an agent's process succeeds or fails. CLQT is a fully closed-loop, cost-aware, strategy-consistent, temporally-gated environment whose agents run a five-stage cycle: gather, synthesize, allocate, execute, reflect. Each round emits a complete DecisionRound sealed into a recompute-verifiable hash chain, so every metric is reconstructable from the trail. Six pillars form the substrate: a hard TimeGate, institutional transaction- and financing-cost modeling, strategy-consistency scoring, three-tier memory, a Model-Context-Protocol tool layer, and mandate-aware synthesis. The same agent runs as a constrained committee of specialized roles or a single full-autonomy orchestrator, making process scaffolding an experimental variable. From the audit trail we compute a five-axis capability scorecard (APM-CS: Coherence, Acuity, Composure, Discipline, Reliability), with Coherence judged partly by a held-out, out-of-cohort LLM to curb self-preference bias. We validate it on a contamination-controlled multi-model backtest with an ablation grid and a live broker track on unseen, post-cutoff data, against a repeated-run noise floor. CLQT separates outcome from capability, yielding not a model ranking but a durable, extensible map of agent competencies and limitations.

2026-06-29T04:26:30Z 50 pages, 14 figures, 10 tables Bo Qu Mingguang Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10805v2 2026-06-27T05:22:18Z

We extend the return extrapolation framework of Atmaz (2022) to incorporate two behaviorally realistic features absent from the linear benchmark: saturation in belief updating and asymmetry between gains and losses. We introduce a smooth, nonlinear, asymmetric extrapolation function and characterize the optimal portfolio of a CRRA investor under Heston (1993) stochastic volatility as the sum of a sentiment-distorted myopic demand, a variance hedging demand, and a sentiment hedging demand. The resulting semilinear Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation is solved by two independent numerical methods, a finite-difference ADI scheme with time-step policy iteration and a deep learning-driven iterative scheme. The model generates four investor-level behavioral anomalies: asymmetric responses to gains and losses, attenuated reactions at extremes, excess trading volume, and welfare loss rising with the strength of extrapolation, each of which maps onto documented empirical patterns. Its central finding is that saturation acts as an endogenous correction mechanism: at the same local slope at the origin, the asymmetric nonlinear extrapolator carries a smaller welfare loss than a linear one.

2026-06-09T12:50:19Z The research work presented in this draft is incomplete, and substantial additional theoretical analysis and experimental verification are required to support our claims. We plan to carry out further research and upload a fully improved revised manuscript later, so we withdraw this premature version Dong Yan Wenrui Ye Zhiyue Zong Wenting Chen