https://arxiv.org/api/Ej6UgmgdLw9p82YkF4SKhTX+r4k2026-07-22T22:13:03Z241413515http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01858v3Mean Field Game of Optimal Tracking Portfolio2026-04-15T08:39:49ZThis paper studies the mean field game (MFG) problem arising from a large population competition in fund management, featuring a new type of relative performance via the benchmark tracking. In the $n$-player model, each agent aims to minimize the expected largest shortfall of the wealth with reference to the benchmark process, which is modeled by a linear combination of the population's average wealth process and a market index process. With a continuum of agents, we formulate the MFG problem with a reflected state process. We establish the existence of the mean field equilibrium (MFE) using the partial differential equation (PDE) approach. Firstly, by applying the dual transform, the best response control of the representative agent can be characterized in analytical form in terms of a dual reflected diffusion process. As a novel contribution, we verify the consistency condition of the MFE in separated domains with the help of the duality relationship and properties of the dual process. Moreover, based on the MFE, we construct an approximate Nash equilibrium for the $n$-player game when the number $n$ is sufficiently large.2025-05-03T16:35:04ZLijun BoYijie HuangXiang Yuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13458v1Interpretable Systematic Risk around the Clock2026-04-15T04:24:40ZIn this paper, I present the first comprehensive, around-the-clock analysis of systematic jump risk by combining high-frequency market data with contemporaneous news narratives identified as the underlying causes of market jumps. These narratives are retrieved and classified using a state-of-the-art open-source reasoning LLM. Decomposing market risk into interpretable jump categories reveals significant heterogeneity in risk premia, with macroeconomic news commanding the largest and most persistent premium. Leveraging this insight, I construct an annually rebalanced real-time Fama-MacBeth factor-mimicking portfolio that isolates the most strongly priced jump risk, achieving a high out-of-sample Sharpe ratio and delivering significant alphas relative to standard factor models. The results highlight the value of around-the-clock analysis and LLM-based narrative understanding for identifying and managing priced risks in real time.2026-04-15T04:24:40ZSongrun Hehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10758v3Investing Is Compression2026-04-15T03:54:44ZIn 1956 John Kelly wrote a paper at Bell Labs describing the relationship between gambling and Information Theory. What came to be known as the Kelly Criterion is both an objective and a closed-form solution to sizing wagers when odds and edge are known. Samuelson argued it was arbitrary and subjective, and successfully kept it out of mainstream economics. Luckily it lived on in computer science, mostly because of Tom Cover's work at Stanford. He showed that it is the uniquely optimal way to invest: it maximizes long-term wealth, minimizes the risk of ruin, and is competitively optimal in a game-theoretic sense, even over the short term.
One of Cover's most surprising contributions to portfolio theory was the universal portfolio. Related to universal compression in information theory, it performs asymptotically as well as the best constant-rebalanced portfolio in hindsight. I borrow a trick from that algorithm to show that Kelly's objective, even in the general form, factors the investing problem into three terms: a money term, an entropy term, and a divergence term. The only way to maximize growth is to minimize divergence which measures the difference between our distribution and the true distribution in bits. Investing is, fundamentally, a compression problem.
This decomposition also yields new practical results. Because the money and entropy terms are constant across strategies in a given backtest, the difference in log growth between two strategies measures their relative divergence in bits. I also introduce a winner fraction heuristic which allocates capital in proportion to each asset's probability of dominating the candidate set. The growth shortfall of this heuristic relative to the optimal portfolio is bounded by the entropy of the winner fraction distribution. To my knowledge, both the heuristic and the entropy bound are original contributions.2026-04-12T17:56:53ZOscar Stiffelmanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05264v2Asset Returns, Portfolio Choice, and Proportional Wealth Taxation2026-04-14T21:55:42ZWe analyse the effect of a proportional wealth tax on asset returns, portfolio choice, and asset pricing. The tax is levied annually on the market value of all holdings at a uniform rate. We show that such a tax is economically equivalent to the government acquiring a proportional stake in the investor's portfolio each period -- a form of risk sharing in which expected wealth and risk are reduced by the same factor, while the return per share is unaffected. This multiplicative separability drives four main results. First, the coefficient of variation of wealth is invariant to the tax rate. Second, the optimal portfolio weights -- and in particular the tangency portfolio -- are independent of the tax rate. Third, the wealth tax is orthogonal to portfolio choice: it induces a homothetic contraction of the opportunity set in the mean-standard deviation plane that preserves the Sharpe ratio of every portfolio. Fourth, both taxed and untaxed investors are willing to pay the same price per share for any asset. The results are derived first under geometric Brownian motion and then generalised to any return distribution in the location-scale family. A complementary Modigliani-Miller analysis confirms pricing neutrality and identifies an inconsistency in the existing literature regarding the discount rate used for after-tax cash flows. Imposing the CAPM as a special case confirms that after-tax betas equal pre-tax betas and the security market line contracts uniformly by $(1-τ_w)$; under CRRA preferences, general-equilibrium returns and prices are unchanged. This resolves an error in Fama (2021). The neutrality results depend on universal taxation at market value and frictionless markets. We formalise three channels -- book-value taxation, liquidity frictions, and dividend extraction -- through which these conditions break neutrality.2026-03-05T15:15:15Z48 pages, 4 figures, 10 tables. v2: Observation 2 rewritten (Pontiff & Schall attribution removed, Hansen & Sandvik attribution tightened); abstract expanded; bibliography audited (7 entries corrected)Anders G Frøsethhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11577v1Risk-Constrained Kelly for Mutually Exclusive Outcomes: CRRA Support Invariance and Logarithmic One-Dimensional Calibration2026-04-13T14:55:44ZWe study the finite mutually exclusive outcome version of risk-constrained Kelly optimization with explicit state prices. The market has outcome probabilities $p_i>0$, state prices $q_i>0$, terminal wealths $W_i=c+x_i/q_i$, and a drawdown-surrogate constraint \[ \sum_{i=1}^n p_i W_i^{-λ}\le 1,\qquad λ>0. \] For constant relative risk aversion utility, we work primarily in the standard overround regime $\sum_i q_i>1$, where every optimizer is necessarily non-full-support. Under the usual unique likelihood-ratio prefix hypothesis for the unconstrained problem, we prove that the constrained optimizer has exactly the same active set. Thus, in the regime where the prefix theorem is meaningful, the risk constraint deforms the funded wealth profile but does not change the active set. The support is therefore invariant across both the CRRA parameter and the drawdown-surrogate parameter.
We then isolate the logarithmic case $γ=1$. Once the common active prefix is known, the constrained problem reduces to a one-dimensional outer calibration together with independent one-dimensional inner equations on the active states. In this case we prove existence, uniqueness, and monotonicity for the inner solves, derive a complete calibration theorem, and record the resulting structured algorithm. We treat the fair and subfair regimes only as boundary cases: full-support phenomena can occur there, so the overround prefix theory no longer yields a parallel exact description of comparable sharpness. A numerical example illustrates how the risk constraint alters the funded wealth profile while leaving support unchanged.2026-04-13T14:55:44Z16 pages, 0 figuresChristopher D. Longhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11143v1Temperature Anomalies and Climate Physical Risk in Portfolio Construction2026-04-13T08:00:49ZDriven by the increasing frequency and intensity of natural disasters and chronic climate threats, we investigate the impact of physical climate risk on global equity portfolios. By employing a panel regression analysis on sectoral returns, we provide statistical evidence that extreme temperature events exert a negative effect on most sectors. We introduce two novel metrics based on these temperature anomalies, Climate Risk Exposure and Climate Exposure Volatility, in order to measure the environmental vulnerability of a portfolio. Unlike available static country-level indices, these metrics incorporate the time varying probability of extreme events and their relations with firm-specific asset intensity. We integrate these measures into a multi-objective portfolio optimization framework. This approach extends the traditional Mean-Variance paradigm, allowing investors to construct portfolios that are resilient to physical climate shocks without sacrificing diversification. Finally, we conduct a backtesting analysis to show the practical benefits of incorporating these climate risk metrics into the investment process, evaluating how climate-aware strategies perform relative to traditional benchmarks.2026-04-13T08:00:49ZMichele AzzoneCarlo BechiGabriele Sbaizhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10375v1On the Structure of Risk Contribution: A Leave-One-Out Decomposition into Inherent and Correlation Risk2026-04-11T23:02:26ZThis paper develops a decomposition of standard Risk Contribution (RC) into two economically interpretable components: inherent risk and correlation risk. Using a leave-one-out representation, each position's RC separates into a term reflecting its own volatility contribution independent of the portfolio and a term capturing its covariance with the remainder of the portfolio. The inherent component is always positive, arising from the intrinsic volatility of the position, while the correlation component may amplify or mitigate total portfolio risk depending on how the position moves relative to other holdings. Because the decomposition operates within standard RC, it preserves the property of strict additivity. This separation provides diagnostic insight not visible from aggregate risk contributions alone. It distinguishes whether a position contributes risk because it is volatile in isolation or because it is highly correlated with the rest of the portfolio, and it clarifies when a negatively correlated position functions as an effective hedge. Two approaches to time-series analysis are presented to track how inherent and correlation risk evolve across market regimes, revealing whether changes in portfolio risk during stress periods are driven by volatility shocks, correlation shifts, or both. Empirical illustrations suggest that the decomposition provides stable, transparent, and easily implementable risk diagnostics that can support portfolio risk reporting, stress testing, and performance attribution.2026-04-11T23:02:26ZCode: https://github.com/nolanalexander/inherent-correlation-decompositionNolan AlexanderFrank Fabozzihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08356v1Measuring Strategy-Decay Risk: Minimum Regime Performance and the Durability of Systematic Investing2026-04-09T15:21:07ZSystematic investment strategies are exposed to a subtle but pervasive vulnerability: the progressive erosion of their effectiveness as market regimes change. Traditional risk measures, designed to capture volatility or drawdowns, overlook this form of structural fragility. This article introduces a quantitative framework for assessing the durability of systematic strategies through minimum regime performance (MRP), defined as the lowest realized risk-adjusted return across distinct historical regimes. MRP serves as a lower bound on a strategy's robustness, capturing how performance deteriorates when underlying relationships weaken or competitive pressures compress alpha. Applied to a broad universe of established factor strategies, the measure reveals a consistent trade-off between efficiency and resilience -- strategies with higher long-term Sharpe ratios do not always exhibit higher MRPs. By translating the persistence of investment efficacy into a measurable quantity, the framework provides investors with a practical diagnostic for identifying and managing strategy-decay risk, a novel dimension of portfolio fragility that complements traditional measures of market and liquidity risk.2026-04-09T15:21:07ZCode: https://github.com/nolanalexander/minimum_regime_performanceNolan AlexanderFrank Fabozzi10.3905/jpm.2025.1.807http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14439v1Multi periods mean-DCVaR optimization: a Recursive Neural Network resolution2026-04-09T13:45:50ZWe study a discrete-time multi-period portfolio optimization problem under an explicit constraint on the Deviation Conditional Value-at-Risk (DCVaR), defined as the excess of Conditional Value-at-Risk over expected terminal wealth. The objective is to maximize expected return subject to a global tail-risk constraint, leading to a time-inconsistent precommitment problem. We propose a recurrent neural-network-based approach to approximate the optimal precommitment policy, which accommodates path-dependent risk constraints and highdimensional state dynamics without relying on dynamic programming. The explicit constraint formulation allows for exact penalty methods and provides a transparent notion of feasibility. The methodology is validated in a classical complete-market financial model and extended to a multi-period portfolio allocation problem in (re)insurance, capturing the long-term risk dynamics of insurance liabilities.2026-04-09T13:45:50ZJérôme LelongLJKVéronique Maume-DeschampsICJ, PSPMWilliam ThevenotICJ, PSPMhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09585v3Causal PDE-Control Models for Dynamic Portfolio Optimization with Latent Drivers2026-04-09T08:31:43ZClassical portfolio models degrade under structural breaks, whereas flexible machine-learning allocation methods often lack arbitrage consistency and interpretability. We propose Causal PDE-Control Models (CPCMs), a framework that integrates structural causal drivers, nonlinear filtering, and forward-backward PDE control to produce robust and transparent allocation rules under partial information. We construct driver-conditional risk-neutral measures on the observable filtration via filtering together with the corresponding martingale representation, linking pricing, hedging, and portfolio choice under a common information set. We further establish a projection-divergence duality showing that restricting portfolios to the causal driver span selects the feasible allocation closest to the unconstrained optimum under a convex divergence, thereby quantifying the stability cost of deviations from the causal manifold, and derive a causal completeness condition identifying when a finite driver span captures systematic premia. Markowitz, CAPM/APT, and Black-Litterman arise as limiting cases, while reinforcement learning and deep hedging appear as unconstrained approximations within the same pricing-control geometry. Empirically, on a U.S.equity panel with more than 300 candidate drivers, CPCM solvers achieve higher Sharpe ratios, lower turnover, and more persistent premia than econometric and machine-learning benchmarks.2025-09-11T16:22:20Z107 pages, 14 figures, 12 tables. (2026, Forthcoming) Reviews in Modern Quantitative Finance II Edited by: Andrey Itkin & Oleksiy KondratyevAlejandro Rodriguez Dominguezhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04649v1$α$-robust utility maximization with intractable claims: A quantile optimization approach2026-04-06T12:58:42ZThis paper studies an $α$-robust utility maximization problem where an investor faces an intractable claim -- an exogenous contingent claim with known marginal distribution but unspecified dependence structure with financial market returns. The $α$-robust criterion interpolates between worst-case ($α=0$) and best-case ($α=1$) evaluations, generalizing both extremes through a continuous ambiguity attitude parameter. For weighted exponential utilities, we establish via rearrangement inequalities and comonotonicity theory that the $α$-robust risk measure is law-invariant, depending only on marginal distributions. This transforms the dynamic stochastic control problem into a concave static quantile optimization over a convex domain. We derive optimality conditions via calculus of variations and characterize the optimal quantile as the solution to a two-dimensional first-order ordinary differential equation system, which is a system of variational inequalities with mixed boundary conditions, enabling numerical solution. Our framework naturally accommodates additional risk constraints such as Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. Numerical experiments reveal how ambiguity attitude, market conditions, and claim characteristics interact to shape optimal payoffs.2026-04-06T12:58:42Z8 figuresXinyu ChenZuo Quan Xuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04641v1Dividend ratcheting and capital injection under the Cramér-Lundberg model: Strong solution and optimal strategy2026-04-06T12:50:20ZWe consider an optimal dividend payout problem for an insurance company whose surplus follows the classical Cramér-Lundberg model. The dividend rate is subject to a ratcheting constraint (i.e., it must be nondecreasing over time), and the company may inject capital at a proportional cost to avoid ruin. This problem gives rise to a stochastic control problem with a self-path-dependent control constraint, costly capital injections, and jump-diffusion dynamics. The associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation is a partial integro-differential variational inequality featuring both a nonlocal integral term and a gradient constraint.
We develop a systematic probabilistic and PDE-based approach to solve this HJB equation. By discretizing the space of admissible dividend rates, we construct a sequence of approximating regime-switching systems of ordinary integro-differential equations. Through careful a priori estimates and a limiting argument, we prove the existence and uniqueness of a \emph{strong solution} in a suitable space. This regularity result is fundamental: it allows us to characterize the optimal dividend policy via a switching free boundary and to construct an explicit optimal feedback control strategy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first complete solution -- comprising both the value function and an implementable optimal strategy -- for a dividend ratcheting problem with capital injection under the Cramér-Lundberg model. Our work advances the mathematical theory of optimal stochastic control beyond the standard viscosity solution framework, providing a rigorous foundation for dividend policy design in economics.2026-04-06T12:50:20ZChonghu GuanZuo Quan Xuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14288v2Beyond Prompting: An Autonomous Framework for Systematic Factor Investing via Agentic AI2026-04-06T04:00:17ZThis paper develops an autonomous framework for systematic factor investing via agentic AI. Rather than relying on sequential manual prompts, our approach operationalizes the model as a self-directed engine that endogenously formulates interpretable trading signals. To mitigate data snooping biases, this closed-loop system imposes strict empirical discipline through out-of-sample validation and economic rationale requirements. Applying this methodology to the U.S. equity market, we document that long-short portfolios formed on the simple linear combination of signals deliver an annualized Sharpe ratio of 3.11 and a return of 59.53%. Finally, our empirics demonstrate that self-evolving AI offers a scalable and interpretable paradigm.2026-03-15T08:56:08ZAllen Yikuan HuangZheqi Fanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03948v1Forecasting Tangency Portfolios and Investing in the Minimum Euclidean Distance Portfolio to Maximize Out-of-Sample Sharpe Ratios2026-04-05T03:41:33ZWe propose a novel model to achieve superior out-of-sample Sharpe ratios. While most research in asset allocation focuses on estimating the return vector and covariance matrix, the first component of our novel model instead forecasts the future tangency portfolio, and the second component then determines the optimal investment portfolio. First, to forecast the tangency portfolio, we forecast the efficient frontier by decomposing its functional form, a square root second-order polynomial, into three interpretable coefficients, which can then be used to calculate a forecasted tangency portfolio. These coefficients can be forecasted using vector autoregressions. Second, the model invests in the portfolio on the efficient frontier that is the minimum Euclidean distance from this forecasted tangency portfolio. A motivation for our approach is to address the limitation that the tangency portfolio only maximizes the Sharpe ratio when future returns and covariances are stationary, and can be directly estimated with historical data, which often does not hold in out-of-sample data. Our approach addresses this shortcoming in a novel way by forecasting the tangency portfolio, rather than estimating return and covariance. For empirical testing, we employ two sets of assets that span the market to demonstrate and validate the performance of this novel method.2026-04-05T03:41:33ZCode: https://github.com/nolanalexander/efficient-frontier-coefficientsNolan AlexanderWilliam Scherer10.3390/engproc2023039034http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03946v1Asset allocation using a Markov process of clustered efficient frontier coefficients states2026-04-05T03:40:52ZWe propose a novel asset allocation model using a Markov process of states defined by clustered efficient frontier coefficients. While most research in Markov models of the market characterize regimes using return and volatility, we instead propose characterizing these states using efficient frontiers, which provide more information on the interactions of underlying assets that comprise the market. Efficient frontiers can be decomposed to their functional form, a square-root second-order polynomial defined by three coefficients, to provide a dimensionality reduction of the return vector and covariance matrix. Each month, the proposed model hierarchically clusters the monthly coefficients data up to the current month, to characterize the market states, then defines a Markov process on the sequence of states. To incorporate these states into portfolio optimization, for each state, we calculate the tangency portfolio using only return data in that state. We then take the expectation of these weights for each state, weighted by the probability of transitioning from the current state to each state. To empirically validate our proposed model, we employ three sets of assets that span the market, and show that our proposed model significantly outperforms benchmark portfolios.2026-04-05T03:40:52ZCode: https://github.com/nolanalexander/efficient-frontier-coefficientsNolan AlexanderWilliam SchererJamey Thompson