https://arxiv.org/api/yLRruNXZytEuljDtYDF4XQo0+kc 2026-07-22T20:35:45Z 2414 105 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09123v1 The Engineering of Skew: A Path-Dependent Framework for Asymmetric Volatility Management 2026-05-09T19:15:00Z Volatility is the language in which finance often describes risk, but it is not the language in which institutions experience risk. Allocators live through drawdowns, liquidity needs, spending rules, rebalance decisions, board oversight, and the interval between a prior high-water mark and full recovery. This paper develops a path-dependent framework for asymmetric volatility management. The arithmetic of recovery is nonlinear: after a drawdown of depth $D$, the required gain is $R=\frac{1}{1-D}-1$. Lower volatility can improve geometric compounding through the familiar small-return approximation $g \approx μ-\frac{1}{2}σ^2$, but symmetric de-risking can also impair recovery if it sacrifices too much upside participation. The relevant design problem is therefore not volatility reduction in isolation; it is conditional exposure shaping. Skew engineering is defined here as the portfolio construction discipline of reducing harmful downside participation more than productive upside participation, controlling submergence, and preserving enough recovery participation to sustain compounding under adverse regimes. The resulting Recovery-Efficiency Protocol links drawdown depth, time underwater, recovery burden reduction, and rebound participation into an allocator-facing reporting discipline. Machine learning and AI methods are framed as tools for conditional estimation, regime mapping, robustness testing, and model-risk governance, not as market prediction. 2026-05-09T19:15:00Z 13 pages, 1 table Gregory A. Fanous http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07107v2 Machine Learning Enhanced Multi-Factor Quantitative Trading: A Cross-Sectional Portfolio Optimization Approach with Bias Correction 2026-05-09T10:17:34Z Rolling-window factor pipelines for Chinese A-share markets contain a subtle but costly flaw: daily price-move limits (+/-10% main-board, +/-20% STAR/ChiNext) render a fraction of closing prices non-executable, yet standard implementations ingest these values before any row-filtering runs. The contaminated aggregates propagate silently through moving averages, correlations, and ranks--a failure mode we term "upstream contamination". On real A-share data it inflates apparent information coefficient by 18% while reducing realised Sharpe by 0.44 points, because the model learns to predict returns it cannot trade. We resolve this with a mask-first design: a Boolean tradability mask is constructed at data load time and threaded through every operator, so that no window ever reads a non-tradable price. Built on this foundation, the system adds (i) a GPU-vectorised 213-factor engine via PyTorch unfold primitives (51x over pandas); (ii) an Adjusted-MSE loss penalising wrong-sign predictions 11x more heavily than magnitude errors; (iii) block-bootstrap GBM augmentation; and (iv) Markowitz-Ledoit-Wolf portfolio optimisation with cvxpy warm-start caching. On a calibrated 3,000-stock synthetic panel the system achieves annualised Sharpe 2.05; on proprietary real A-share data (2022-2024) it achieves Sharpe 1.63. Ablation shows the mask contract is the single largest contributor (+0.44), exceeding any model or loss choice. The full implementation is released under MIT licence at https://github.com/initial-d/ml-quant-trading. 2025-06-02T03:04:19Z 18 pages, 12 tables, 6 figures. Code at https://github.com/initial-d/ml-quant-trading. v2: rewritten abstract, added deflated Sharpe analysis (DSR=0.978), expanded limitations section, corrected factor count from 500-1000 to 213 Yimin Du http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06654v3 Goal-based portfolio selection with mental accounting 2026-05-09T08:40:15Z We present a continuous-time portfolio selection framework that reflects goal-based investment principles and mental accounting behavior. In this framework, an investor with multiple investment goals constructs separate portfolios, each corresponding to a specific goal, with penalties imposed on fund transfers between these goals, referred to as mental costs. By applying the stochastic Perron's method, we demonstrate that the value function is the unique constrained viscosity solution of a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation system. Numerical analysis reveals several key features: the free boundaries exhibit complex shapes with bulges and notches; the optimal strategy for one portfolio depends on the wealth level of another; investors must diversify both among stocks and across portfolios; and they may postpone reallocating surplus from an important goal to a less important one until the former's deadline approaches. 2025-06-07T04:16:44Z 71 pages, 8 figures Erhan Bayraktar Bingyan Han http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09821v2 Global Persistence, Local Residual Structure: Forecasting Heterogeneous Investment Panels 2026-05-04T12:44:56Z On a 93-actor quarterly panel mixing macro indicators, institutional data, and firm-level investment ratios, global factor augmentation degrades prediction for actor subgroups whose dynamics are misrepresented by the shared basis. A two-stage architecture -- global pooled AR(1) for shared persistence, block-specific local models for residual dynamics -- improves full-panel out-of-sample $R^2$ from 0.630 to 0.677 ($Δ= +0.047$, CI $[+0.036, +0.058]$, 10/10 windows, placebo $p \leq 0.001$). A held-out decade test (block partition frozen on 2005--2014 data, evaluated on unseen 2015--2024 windows) confirms the gain ($Δ= +0.050$, 10/10), and a stratified placebo that fixes the macro/firm data-type split and permutes only firm-sector assignments corroborates ($z = 7.25$, $p \leq 0.001$). Cross-regime replication on a 109-actor UK/EU heterogeneous panel ($Δ= +0.017$, 8/8 windows) and a combined US + UK/EU panel of 202 actors ($Δ= +0.030$, placebo $z = 9.68$ -- exceeding the original US-only $z = 7.82$) confirms the architecture transfers across regimes. A 146-firm CapEx/Assets robustness check refines the scope condition: the gain depends on cross-sectional dispersion in autoregressive structure, which data-type heterogeneity reliably produces but which is also present in firm-only panels under suitable ratio choices. 2026-04-10T18:55:09Z 37 pages, 21 tables, 5 figures, 12 appendices. v2 adds cross-regime replication on a 109-actor UK/EU heterogeneous panel and a combined US + UK/EU panel of 202 actors (new Section 6 and Appendix L); abstract revised. Replication package: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/harp-reproduction Oleg Roshka http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18679v2 Identifying Risk Variables From Raw ESG Data Using Its Hierarchical Structure 2026-05-03T04:19:51Z Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data provides non-financial insights into corporations. In this study, we aim to identify relevant ESG raw variables to assess financial risk, measured by logarithmic volatility of return. We propose a framework specifically designed for ESG datasets characterized by a hierarchical data structure and a significantly larger number of variables than observations. We show that raw variables selected by the proposed framework are significantly more relevant to financial risk than aggregated ESG scores. Furthermore, these selected risk variables provide additional insights beyond the traditional financial factors. We validate the robustness of this framework using out-of-sample data. We illustrate our framework using company data from various sectors of the US economy. We further identify the specific ESG risk variables relevant to large and small companies within each sector. 2025-08-26T04:52:55Z 25 pages, 9 Figures, 11 Tables Zhi Chen Zachary Feinstein Ionut Florescu http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27447v1 Sampler-Robust Optimization under Generative Models 2026-04-30T05:33:15Z Modern stochastic optimization pipelines increasingly rely on learned generative models to represent uncertainty, while downstream decisions are evaluated almost entirely through Monte Carlo scenarios. This shifts the operational object of uncertainty from an explicit probability law to the sampler induced by the learned generator. Reliability therefore depends on two errors: sampler misspecification and finite-simulation error. We propose Sampler-Robust Optimization (SRO), which optimizes decisions against the worst-case sampler induced by perturbing the learned generator. This sampler-first formulation aligns with simulation-based decision pipelines and admits a sharpness-aware interpretation: it favors decisions whose performance is stable under generator perturbations, rather than merely under the nominal sampler. Under a coverage assumption, we show that the empirical worst-case objective provides a high-probability upper certificate for the true population objective, with finite-simulation error partially absorbed by the robustification used to guard against sampler misspecification. The framework accommodates generative models with or without explicit densities and admits efficient minimax procedures. Portfolio-optimization experiments show that SRO produces more stable decisions and improves out-of-sample performance under distribution shift. 2026-04-30T05:33:15Z Ziwei Zhang Jonathan Yu-Meng Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27287v1 A Levered ETF Anomaly Explained 2026-04-30T00:47:04Z Counterintuitively, the S&P 500 Index rose between January 1, 2022, and December 29, 2023, while exchange-traded funds (ETFs) seeking to deliver 2x and 3x daily returns of the index delivered substantially negative returns. Roughly two-thirds of the difference between the returns of the index and the levered ETFs can be attributed to compounding and volatility. The remaining difference is explained by the covariance between the ETFs' deviations from constant leverage and the index's return. 2026-04-30T00:47:04Z 10 pages, 4 figures Stephen W. Bianchi Lisa R. Goldberg http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25977v2 Auditing Marketing Budget Allocation with Hindsight Regret 2026-04-30T00:29:07Z Organizations routinely make strategic budget allocations under operational constraints, but often lack a principled way to assess whether realized allocations were close to the best feasible choices in hindsight. We present a retrospective auditing framework based on hindsight regret, defined as the opportunity cost of the realized allocation relative to a constraint-faithful benchmark under the same budget and stability guardrails. The framework estimates regime-specific spend--response functions from historical logs, computes feasible hindsight allocations via constrained optimization, and propagates uncertainty through Monte Carlo evaluation to produce regret distributions, expected lift, and probability-of-improvement summaries. This separates allocation inefficiency from uncertainty in the estimated response surfaces. Experiments on real marketing allocation logs show that the framework yields interpretable post-hoc diagnostics and reveals a practical trade-off between allocation flexibility and detectability: moderate feasible reallocations often capture most measurable gain, while larger shifts move into weak-support regions with higher uncertainty. The result is a practical method for auditing historical budget decisions when online experimentation is costly or infeasible. 2026-04-28T13:57:02Z 6 pages, 8 figures Nilavra Pathak Olivier Jeunen Eric Lambert http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07991v2 Optimal Option Portfolios for Skew-Elliptical t Returns 2026-04-29T21:46:26Z This paper explores option portfolio optimization when the underlying returns are skew-elliptical t-distributed. We use the variance and value at risk (VaR) to measure portfolio risk. The novelty of our work is the departure from the traditional normal returns setting, allowing investors to capture both heavy-tailed and skewed market dynamics. We provide explicit portfolio weights for the variance and VaR approximation. Our second contribution is the numerical representation of portfolio weights, obtained from numerical optimization for better VaR approximations. The effect of skewness on the portfolio weights is quantified by comparing our optimal skew t weights with those generated in the Student t setting. We also find that, as expected, a better VaR approximation risk measure yields optimal portfolio weights which are more different than the variance optimal weights. 2026-01-12T20:43:18Z Keywords. Options, Optimal Portfolios, Value at Risk, Skew-Elliptical t Returns 18 pages, 4 figures Kyle Sung Traian A. Pirvu http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27186v1 Learning to Spend: Model Predictive Control for Budgeting under Non-Stationary Returns 2026-04-29T20:39:25Z We study finite-horizon budget allocation as a closed-loop economic control problem and evaluate receding-horizon Model Predictive Control (MPC) relative to reactive budgeting policies. Budgets are allocated periodically under execution noise and operational constraints, while return efficiency may evolve over time. Using a controlled simulation framework motivated by digital marketing, we compare reactive pacing to MPC across environments with increasing degrees of non-stationarity. Our results show that non-stationarity alone does not justify predictive control. When return dynamics are stationary or evolve through unpredictable stochastic drift, MPC offers no systematic advantage over reactive baselines. By contrast, when return efficiency exhibits predictable structure over the planning horizon, that is captured through an underlying model, MPC consistently outperforms reactive budgeting by exploiting intertemporal trade-offs. 2026-04-29T20:39:25Z 8 pages, 0 figures Nilavra Pathak Smriti Shyamal Prasant Mhasker Christopher Swartz http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24831v2 Optimising cryptocurrency portfolios through stable clustering of price correlation networks 2026-04-29T18:02:06Z The rapidly evolving cryptocurrency market presents unique challenges for investment due to its inherent volatility and evolving regulatory environment. Collective price movements can be exploited to construct diversified portfolios with improved risk-return profiles. This paper introduces an integrated framework that combines network analysis, price forecasting, and portfolio theory to identify stable groups of highly correlated cryptocurrencies for profitable portfolio construction. We employ the Louvain community detection algorithm together with consensus clustering to extract temporally persistent correlation clusters, and incorporate ARIMA-based price forecasts to enhance forward-looking cluster formation. Using 5 years of daily closing prices, we evaluate portfolio performance across multiple strategies and holding horizons, assessing both profitability and downside risk with return-based and tail-risk metrics. Our empirical results show that predictive consensus-clustering portfolios maintain consistently positive and stable performance up to a 14-day horizon, exhibit favourable gain-loss asymmetry, and achieve tighter tail-risk control. These findings demonstrate that stable interdependencies in cryptocurrency markets can be leveraged to construct profitable and risk-aware portfolios across short-term holding horizons. 2025-05-30T17:33:12Z Comments welcomed Ruixue Jing Ryota Kobayashi Luis Enrique Correa Rocha http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26747v1 From Hypotheses to Factors: Constrained LLM Agents in Cryptocurrency Markets 2026-04-29T14:46:10Z LLM agents are promising tools for empirical discovery, but their flexibility can also turn discovery into uncontrolled search. We study how to use agents under a reproducible protocol through cryptocurrency factor discovery. Our framework casts the task as sequential hypothesis search: an agent reads an append-only experiment trace, proposes falsifiable factor hypotheses, and maps them to executable recipes, while a deterministic engine enforces fixed data splits, selection gates, transaction costs, and portfolio tests. Candidate actions are restricted to a point-in-time factor DSL, making both successful and failed hypotheses auditable. A ridge-combined portfolio trained only on 2020--2022 data achieves a 44.55% annualized return and Sharpe ratio of 1.55 in the 2024--2026 pure out-of-sample period after a 5 basis point one-way trading cost. 2026-04-29T14:46:10Z Yikuan Huang Zheqi Fan Kaiqi Hu Yifan Ye http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13529v4 Improving Bayesian Optimization for Portfolio Management with an Adaptive Scheduling 2026-04-29T12:43:19Z Existing black-box portfolio management systems are prevalent in the financial industry due to commercial and safety constraints, though their performance can fluctuate dramatically with changing market regimes. Evaluating these non-transparent systems is computationally expensive, as fixed budgets limit the number of possible observations. Therefore, achieving stable and sample-efficient optimization for these systems has become a critical challenge. This work presents a novel Bayesian optimization framework (TPE-AS) that improves search stability and efficiency for black-box portfolio models under these limited observation budgets. Standard Bayesian optimization, which solely maximizes expected return, can yield erratic search trajectories and misalign the surrogate model with the true objective, thereby wasting the limited evaluation budget. To mitigate these issues, we propose a weighted Lagrangian estimator that leverages an adaptive schedule and importance sampling. This estimator dynamically balances exploration and exploitation by incorporating both the maximization of model performance and the minimization of the variance of model observations. It guides the search from broad, performance-seeking exploration towards stable and desirable regions as the optimization progresses. Extensive experiments and ablation studies, which establish our proposed method as the primary approach and other configurations as baselines, demonstrate its effectiveness across four backtest settings with three distinct black-box portfolio management models. 2025-04-18T07:40:24Z 5 pages, 2 figures; version of record. ICAAI 2025, 9th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence (ICAAI 2025), November 14-16, 2025, Manchester, United Kingdom. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pages 21-25. Version 4, code repository added: https://github.com/pixelhero98/TPE-AS In 2025 9th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence (ICAAI 2025), November 14-16, 2025, Manchester, United Kingdom. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pages 21-25 Zinuo You John Cartlidge Karen Elliott Menghan Ge Daniel Gold 10.1145/3787279.3787285 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25378v1 Yau's Affine-Normal Descent for Large-Scale Unrestricted Higher-Moment Portfolio Optimization 2026-04-28T08:42:43Z Unrestricted mean-variance-skewness-kurtosis portfolio optimization can capture asymmetry and tail risk, but sample-moment formulations become computationally impractical when the asset universe is large: they produce dense nonconvex quartic objectives with prohibitive coskewness and cokurtosis tensors and anisotropic, ill-conditioned level sets. We develop a structure-exploiting algorithm based on Yau's affine-normal descent that follows affine-normal directions of the current level set while working directly with the return matrix. The method avoids explicit higher-order tensors and exploits the quartic structure for exact sample oracles, derivative evaluation, and exact line search. We also provide theory for the reduced simplex formulation, including regularity and convexity conditions that separate data-map geometry from investor preference coefficients. Computational results show a clear implementation split: a direct configuration is effective on the standard small benchmark, whereas a preconditioned conjugate-gradient configuration with stall recovery becomes the preferred large-scale implementation by the upper end of the hundreds and remains competitive as the asset universe moves into the thousands. On a 5-minute A-share panel with 5,440 stocks, the method makes direct full-universe comparisons with exact mean-variance portfolios feasible and shows on the baseline split that the incremental value of higher moments is strongest at moderate return targets. 2026-04-28T08:42:43Z 46 pages, 4 figures, 11 tables, 1 algorithm Ya-Juan Wang Yi-Shuai Niu Artan Sheshmani Shing-Tung Yau http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23833v1 Beyond De Prado and Cotton: Hierarchical and Iterative Methods for General Mean-Variance Portfolios 2026-04-26T18:38:53Z Hierarchical Risk Parity (De Pardo) and the Schur-complement generalization of Cotton are among the most widely adopted regularised portfolio construction methods, yet both are signal-blind: they solve only the minimum-variance problem and cannot accommodate an arbitrary expected-return forecast. This paper introduces three methods that incorporate alpha signals into hierarchical and regularised portfolio construction. HRP-$μ$ is a hierarchical allocator that accepts an arbitrary signal $μ$ and nests standard HRP when $γ= 0$ and $μ=\mathbf{1}$. It preserves the tree-based structure of HRP while extending it beyond the minimum-variance setting. HRP-$Σμ$ strengthens this construction by replacing inverse-variance representatives with recursive local mean-variance optima, thereby using richer within-cluster covariance information at the same $O(N^2)$ asymptotic cost. CRISP (Correlation-Regularised Iterative Shrinkage Portfolios) is an iterative solver for $P_γw = μ$ with $P_γ= (1-γ)\operatorname{diag}(Σ) + γΣ$, so that $γ$ interpolates between a diagonal portfolio rule and full Markowitz. At convergence, CRISP is Markowitz applied to a variance-preserving shrunk covariance-diagonal variances unchanged, off-diagonal correlations shrunk-with $γ$ tuned for out-of-sample Sharpe rather than covariance-estimation loss. In Monte Carlo experiments across multiple covariance regimes and estimation ratios, HRP-$μ$ and HRP-$Σμ$ both outperform plain HRP with HRP-$Σμ$ consistently improving on HRP-$μ$. CRISP at intermediate $γ$ is the dominant method in both regimes, outperforming HRP, Cotton, Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage, direct Markowitz, and the signal-aware hierarchical methods. 2026-04-26T18:38:53Z 93 pages, 8 figures Bernd Johannes Wuebben