https://arxiv.org/api/JWTaR2x6o2zfZdWL1XXAhUFnppk 2026-03-18T08:49:21Z 2295 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16006v1 2026-03-16T23:30:15Z

We extend the Fokker--Planck framework of Frøseth (2026, arXiv:2603.05283) to populations of investors with heterogeneous, persistent return-generating ability. When the drift coefficient in the Langevin equation for log-wealth varies across investors, the proportional wealth tax remains a uniform drift shift but ceases to be neutral in the economic sense: its real incidence differs across ability types, and the stationary wealth distribution changes shape. We derive the extended Fokker--Planck equation on the joint space of log-wealth and ability, characterise the conditions under which the drift-shift symmetry breaks, and identify the consequences for asset prices and portfolio allocations. The analysis connects the neutrality results of Frøseth (2026, arXiv:2603.05264) and the Fokker--Planck dynamics of Frøseth (2026, arXiv:2603.05283) to the heterogeneous-returns literature, notably the "use-it-or-lose-it" mechanism of Guvenen, Kambourov, Kuruscu, Ocampo-Diaz and Chen (2023).

2026-03-16T23:30:15Z 24 pages, 1 figure, 1 table Anders G Frøseth http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15974v1 2026-03-16T22:44:27Z

A proportional wealth tax -- a levy on the stock of wealth -- preserves portfolio neutrality by acting as a uniform drift shift in the Fokker-Planck equation for wealth dynamics. We extend this result to the full system of ownership taxes (eierkostnader) that a shareholder faces: a corporate tax on gross profits, a capital income tax on the risk-free return, a dividend and capital gains tax on the excess return, and a wealth tax on net assets. Each tax modifies the drift of the wealth process in a distinct way -- multiplicative rescaling, constant shift, or regime-dependent compression -- while leaving the diffusion coefficient unchanged. We show that the combined system preserves portfolio neutrality under three conditions: (i) the capital income tax rate equals the corporate tax rate, (ii) the shielding rate equals the risk-free rate, and (iii) the wealth tax assessment is uniform across assets. When these conditions hold, the after-tax excess return is a uniform rescaling of the pre-tax excess return by the factor (1-tau_c)(1-tau_d), and the drift-shift symmetry of the wealth-tax-only case generalises to a drift-shift-and-rescale symmetry. We classify the distortions that arise when each condition fails and show that flow-tax distortions and stock-tax distortions are additively separable: they do not interact. The shielding deduction -- a feature of several real-world tax systems, including the Norwegian aksjonaermodellen -- emerges as the mechanism that restores the symmetry between equity and debt taxation within this framework. Calibrated to the Norwegian dual income tax, conditions (i) and (ii) hold by institutional design; the only binding distortion is non-uniform wealth tax assessment, which generates portfolio tilts roughly 300 times larger than any residual flow-tax channel.

2026-03-16T22:44:27Z 27 pages, 1 figure, 6 tables Anders G Frøseth http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15947v1 2026-03-16T21:53:00Z

We study cubic cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization, a higher-order extension of the standard Markowitz formulation where three-way sector co-movement terms augment the quadratic risk-return objective. Classical heuristics like simulated annealing (SA) and tabu search require Rosenberg quadratization of these cubic interactions. This inflates the variable count from n to 5n and introduces penalty terms that substantially distort the augmented search landscape. In contrast, Hyper-Adaptive Momentum Dynamics (HAMD) operates directly on the native higher-order objective using a hybrid pipeline combining continuous Hamiltonian search, exact cardinality-preserving projection, and iterated local search (ILS). On a cubic portfolio benchmark under matched 60-second CPU budgets, HAMD achieves substantially lower decoded native cubic objective values than SA and tabu search, yielding single-seed relative improvements of 87.9%, 71.2%, 59.5%, and 46.9% at n = 200, 300, 500, and 1000. In a detailed three-seed study at n = 200, HAMD attains a median native objective of 195.65 (zero variance), while SA and tabu yield 1208.07. Decoded-feasibility analysis shows SA satisfies all exact cardinality and Rosenberg auxiliary constraints, yet decodes to a native objective 80-88% worse than HAMD, demonstrating a surrogate-distortion effect rather than simple infeasibility. Exact calibration on small instances (n = 20, 25, 30) confirms HAMD finds the provably global optimum in 9/9 trials. These results demonstrate that native higher-order search offers a substantial advantage over quadratized surrogate optimization for constrained cubic portfolio problems.

2026-03-16T21:53:00Z 15 pages, 0 figures, 10 tables. Reference implementation and benchmark reproduction scripts available at: https://github.com/symplectic-opt/hamd-community Greg Serbarinov http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15511v1 2026-03-16T16:38:17Z

Given a reference risk measure, the risk budgeting is the portfolio where each asset contributes a predetermined amount to the total risk. We propose a novel approach, alternative to the ones proposed in the literature, for the calculation of the risk budgeting portfolio. This different perspective on the problem has several interesting consequences. For the calculation of the portfolio, we define a Cauchy sequence within the simplex of R^n, whose limit corresponds to the risk budgeting portfolio. This construction allows for the straightforward implementation of an efficient algorithm, avoiding the need to solve auxiliary, equivalent optimization problems, which may be computationally challenging and hard to interpret in the decision theory context. We compare our algorithm with the standard optimization-based methods proposed in the literature. From a theoretical point of view, starting from the Cauchy sequence, we define a function for which the risk budgeting portfolio is a fixed point. Therefore, sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the fixed point can be used. The methodology is developed for general risk measures and implemented in detail in the case of standard deviation.

2026-03-16T16:38:17Z 33 pages Claudia Fassino Pierpaolo Uberti http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20434v2 2026-03-16T10:32:38Z

In this work we propose a framework to construct Market-Implied Sustainability (MIS) scores for individual firms by exploiting fund-level sustainability classifications and granular portfolio holdings. The central idea is that the relative over/under-representation of a stock in sustainability-oriented funds reveals a market-based assessment of its sustainability profile. We implement the methodology in the European context using the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), considering Article 9 (``dark green'') funds as the sustainability-oriented segment and comparing their portfolio compositions to those of other funds. We compute MIS scores for a large cross-section of European companies over the period 2010--2025. We then examine how MIS relates to traditional firm-level ESG ratings provided by LSEG and analyze the determinants of potential divergences between the two measures. Finally, we assess the economic relevance of MIS through portfolio-tilting strategies, ranging from rule-based reallocations to constrained optimal allocation frameworks. The results show that MIS scores capture dimensions of sustainability that differ systematically from conventional ESG ratings. In portfolio applications, tilting toward firms with high MIS scores improves risk-adjusted performance, whereas strategies based solely on ESG ratings do not deliver comparable gains. Overall, the findings suggest that market-implied sustainability measures provide complementary information to fundamentals-based ESG metrics and have practical relevance for asset allocation and regulatory monitoring.

2025-10-23T11:12:14Z Rosella Giacometti Gabriele Torri Marco Bonomelli Davide Lauria http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12598v2 2026-03-15T13:09:41Z

This paper studies continuous-time risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RL) under the entropy-regularized, exploratory diffusion process formulation with the exponential-form objective. The risk-sensitive objective arises either as the agent's risk attitude or as a distributionally robust approach against the model uncertainty. Owing to the martingale perspective in Jia and Zhou (J Mach Learn Res 24(161): 1--61, 2023) the risk-sensitive RL problem is shown to be equivalent to ensuring the martingale property of a process involving both the value function and the q-function, augmented by an additional penalty term: the quadratic variation of the value process, capturing the variability of the value-to-go along the trajectory. This characterization allows for the straightforward adaptation of existing RL algorithms developed for non-risk-sensitive scenarios to incorporate risk sensitivity by adding the realized variance of the value process. Additionally, I highlight that the conventional policy gradient representation is inadequate for risk-sensitive problems due to the nonlinear nature of quadratic variation; however, q-learning offers a solution and extends to infinite horizon settings. Finally, I prove the convergence of the proposed algorithm for Merton's investment problem and quantify the impact of temperature parameter on the behavior of the learning procedure. I also conduct simulation experiments to demonstrate how risk-sensitive RL improves the finite-sample performance in the linear-quadratic control problem.

2024-04-19T03:05:41Z 54 pages, 2 figures, 1 table Yanwei Jia http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14288v1 2026-03-15T08:56:08Z

This paper develops an autonomous framework for systematic factor investing via agentic AI. Rather than relying on sequential manual prompts, our approach operationalizes the model as a self-directed engine that endogenously formulates interpretable trading signals. To mitigate data snooping biases, this closed-loop system imposes strict empirical discipline through out-of-sample validation and economic rationale requirements. Applying this methodology to the U.S. equity market, we document that long-short portfolios formed on the simple linear combination of signals deliver an annualized Sharpe ratio of 3.11 and a return of 59.53%. Finally, our empirics demonstrate that self-evolving AI offers a scalable and interpretable paradigm.

2026-03-15T08:56:08Z Allen Yikuan Huang Zheqi Fan http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13581v1 2026-03-13T20:44:52Z

For a single event with finitely many mutually exclusive outcomes, the full Kelly problem is to maximize expected log wealth over nonnegative stakes together with an optional cash position. The optimal formula is classical, but the support-selection step is often presented via Lagrange multipliers. This note gives a shorter state-price derivation. A cash fraction $c$ acts as an implicit position in every outcome: in terminal-wealth terms, it is equivalent to a baseline stake $cq_i$ on outcome $i$, where $q_i$ is the state price. On any active support, explicit bets therefore only top up favorable outcomes from this baseline $cq_i$ to the optimal total stake $p_i$. This yields the formula $x_i = (p_i - c q_i)_+$, the threshold rule $p_i/q_i > c$, and, after sorting outcomes by $p_i/q_i$, a one-pass greedy algorithm for support selection. The result is standard in substance, but the implicit-position viewpoint gives a compact proof and a convenient way to remember the solution.

2026-03-13T20:44:52Z 7 pages, no figures Christopher D. Long http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00299v2 2026-03-13T14:36:05Z

We investigate the static portfolio selection problem of S-shaped and non-concave utility maximization under first-order and second-order stochastic dominance (SD) constraints. In many S-shaped utility optimization problems, one should require a liquidation boundary to guarantee the existence of a finite concave envelope function. A first-order SD (FSD) constraint can replace this requirement and provide an alternative for risk management. We explicitly solve the optimal solution under a general S-shaped utility function with a first-order stochastic dominance constraint. However, the second-order SD (SSD) constrained problem under non-concave utilities is difficult to solve analytically due to the invalidity of Sion's maxmin theorem. For this sake, we propose a numerical algorithm to obtain a plausible and sub-optimal solution for general non-concave utilities. The key idea is to detect the poor performance region with respect to the SSD constraints, characterize its structure and modify the distribution on that region to obtain (sub-)optimality. A key financial insight is that the decision maker should follow the SD constraint on the poor performance scenario while conducting the unconstrained optimal strategy otherwise. We provide numerical experiments to show that our algorithm effectively finds a sub-optimal solution in many cases. Finally, we develop an algorithm-guided piecewise-neural-network framework to learn the solution of the SSD problem, which demonstrates accelerated convergence compared to standard neural network approaches.

2025-11-29T03:41:35Z 30 pages Zeyun Hu Yang Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05169v2 2026-03-11T19:55:11Z

We introduce Onflow, a reinforcement learning method for optimizing portfolio allocation via gradient flows. Our approach dynamically adjusts portfolio allocations to maximize expected log returns while accounting for transaction costs. Using a softmax parameterization, Onflow updates allocations through an ordinary differential equation derived from gradient flow methods. This algorithm belongs to the large class of stochastic optimization procedures; we measure its efficiency by comparing our results to the mathematical theoretical values in a log-normal framework and to standard benchmarks from the 'old NYSE' dataset. For log-normal assets with zero transaction costs, Onflow replicates Markowitz optimal portfolio, achieving the best possible allocation. Numerical experiments from the 'old NYSE' dataset show that Onflow leads to dynamic asset allocation strategies whose performances are: a) comparable to benchmark strategies such as Cover's Universal Portfolio or Helmbold et al. ``multiplicative updates'' approach when transaction costs are zero, and b) better than previous procedures when transaction costs are high. Onflow can even remain efficient in regimes where other dynamical allocation techniques do not work anymore. Onflow is a promising portfolio management strategy that relies solely on observed prices, requiring no assumptions about asset return distributions. This makes it robust against model risk, offering a practical solution for real-world trading strategies.

2023-12-08T16:49:19Z Gabriel Turinici Pierre Brugiere http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22858v2 2026-03-11T01:53:24Z

Islamic equity screening relies on multiple binary rulebooks that often classify the same firm differently. This paper develops a Continuous Shariah Compliance Index (CSCI) on $[0,1]$ that embeds the published business-activity and financial-ratio thresholds of six leading standards in a single transparent measure. Using CRSP/Compustat U.S. equities from 1999-2024 with lagged accounting inputs and monthly portfolio formation, we document four results. First, existing binary standards map to distinct regions of a common compliance scale, so firms that receive the same pass/fail label can still differ materially in compliance strength. Second, CSCI-threshold portfolios provide a transparent way to vary compliance intensity while retaining economically meaningful diversification, although baseline risk-adjusted performance declines modestly as thresholds tighten. Third, the September 2023 DJIM/S&P methodology change admits firms with materially lower CSCI scores than firms that remained compliant under both the old and new rules. Fourth, in cross-sectional return tests, CSCI is not reliably associated with higher expected returns once standard characteristics are controlled for. The main contribution of CSCI is therefore measurement and portfolio design rather than the discovery of a new priced factor.

2025-12-28T10:04:53Z 28 pages, 8 figures, 11 tables. CRSP/Compustat U.S. equities 1999-2024 Abdulrahman Qadi Akash Sharma Francesca Medda http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09966v1 2026-03-10T17:57:19Z

In quantum mechanics and finance, numeraire invariance - the unobservability of absolute phase or price scale - fits with a projective and curved state space. This projective geometry has a measurable signature. For spin-one and higher spin systems, the Taylor expansion of directed distance contains a non-zero cubic term, which induces a fundamental asymmetry under the exchange of states. The Second Law, the failure of Maxwell's demon, and the limitations of sequential traders can all be reduced to this asymmetry.

2026-03-10T17:57:19Z 6 pages Bernhard K Meister http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09303v1 2026-03-10T07:38:26Z

This paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) form and express investor risk profiles, a critical component of retail investment advising. We examine three LLMs (GPT, Gemini, and Llama) and assess their responses to a standardized risk questionnaire under varying prompts. In particular, we establish each model's default investment profile by analyzing repeated responses per model. We observe that LLMs are generally longterm investors but exhibit different tendencies in risk tolerance: Gemini has a moderate risk level with highly consistent responses, Llama skews more conservative, and GPT appears moderately aggressive with the greatest variation in answers. Moreover, we find that assigning specific personas such as age, wealth, and investment experience leads each LLM to adjust its risk profile, although the extent of these adjustments differs across the models.

2026-03-10T07:38:26Z Hanyong Cho Geumil Bae Jang Ho Kim http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09301v1 2026-03-10T07:35:31Z

This study introduces a benchmark framework for evaluating the financial decision-making capabilities of large language models (LLMs) through portfolio optimization problems with mathematically explicit solutions. Unlike existing financial benchmarks that emphasize language-processing tasks, the proposed framework directly tests optimization-based reasoning in investment contexts. A large set of multiple-choice questions is generated by varying objectives, candidate assets, and investment constraints, with each problem designed to include a unique correct solution and systematically constructed alternatives. Experimental results comparing GPT-4, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Llama 3.1-70B reveal distinct performance patterns: GPT achieves the highest accuracy in risk-based objectives and remains stable under constraints, Gemini performs well in return-based tasks but struggles under other conditions, and Llama records the lowest overall performance. These findings highlight both the potential and current limitations of LLMs in applying quantitative reasoning to finance, while providing a scalable foundation for developing LLM-based services in portfolio management.

2026-03-10T07:35:31Z Hanyong Cho Jang Ho Kim http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09219v1 2026-03-10T05:40:23Z

Transitioning a strategy from backtest to live trading is a common failure point for quantitative systems due to parameter overfitting, selection bias, and sensitivity to regime changes. This paper presents the AlgoXpert Alpha Research Framework, a standardized protocol that evaluates strategies across three stages: In Sample (IS), which focuses on stable parameter regions instead of single optima; Walk Forward Analysis (WFA) using rolling windows and purge gaps to reduce information leakage, supported by majority pass and catastrophic veto rules; and Out of Sample (OOS) testing under strict parameter lock with no further tuning. The framework applies a defense in depth structure that includes structural safeguards such as cliff veto, execution controls such as spread and leverage guards, and equity protection mechanisms such as circuit breakers and a kill switch. A case study on USDJPY M5 intraday data demonstrates how to detect overfitting through performance decay and drawdown behavior across chronological stages. A post validation comparison of four alpha variants (v1 to v4) shows rank reversal when the objective changes from maximizing Sharpe to minimizing maximum drawdown, highlighting the trade off between risk adjusted performance and tail risk control.

2026-03-10T05:40:23Z Alpha Research Framework; Walk-Forward Analysis; Purged Validation; Pa rameter Stability; Backtest Overfitting; Selection Bias; Execution-Aware Backtesting; Stress Testing; Kill Switch; Out-of-Sample Verification. 19 Pages, 2 figures The Anh Pham Bao Chan Nguyen Nguyet Nguyen Thi