https://arxiv.org/api/SxSwLqmef3l1PXzFgXLucFKC3u82026-06-15T03:33:21Z325155515http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01876v2Well-posedness of behavioral singular stochastic control problems2025-07-04T19:55:27ZWe investigate the well-posedness of a general class of singular stochastic control problems in which controls are processes of finite variation. We develop an abstract framework, which we then apply to storage management and portfolio investment problems under proportional transaction costs. Within this setting, we establish the existence of an optimal strategy in the class of randomized controls for a range of goal functionals, including cumulative prospect theory (CPT) preferences. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first treatment of behavioral storage management with the CPT goal functional. For the portfolio management problem, our analysis exploits the metrizable Meyer-Zheng topology to simplify proofs. We thoroughly investigate the applicability of the Skorokhod representation theorem for adapted random processes. Overall, the presented framework provides a clear separation between constraints imposed on the market model and properties required of the goal functional.2025-05-03T17:37:28ZArtur Sidorenkohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00405v2Computation of Greeks under rough Volterra stochastic volatility models using the Malliavin calculus approach2025-07-04T16:07:51ZUsing Malliavin calculus techniques, we obtain formulas for computing Greeks under different rough Volterra stochastic volatility models. Due to the fact that underlying prices are not always square integrable, we extend the classical integration by parts formula to integrable but not necessarily square integrable functionals. First of all, we obtain formulas for general stochastic volatility (SV) models, concretely the Greeks Delta, Gamma, Rho, Vega and we introduce the Greek with respect to the roughness parameter. Then, the particular case of rough Volterra SV models is analyzed. Finally, three examples are treated in detail: the family of alpha-RFSV models, that includes rough versions of SABR and Bergomi models, a mixed alpha-RFSV model with two different Hurst parameters representing short (roughness) and long memory, and the rough Stein-Stein model. For different models and Greeks we show a numerical convergence of our formulas in Monte Carlo simulations and depict for example a dependence of the Greeks on the roughness parameter.2023-12-01T07:55:04ZMishari Al-ForaihÒscar BurésJan PospíšilJosep Viveshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03470v1Perpetual American Standard and Lookback Options in Insider Models with Progressively Enlarged Filtrations2025-07-04T10:47:50ZWe derive closed-form solutions to the optimal stopping problems related to the pricing of perpetual American standard and lookback put and call options in the extensions of the Black-Merton-Scholes model with progressively enlarged filtrations. More specifically, the information available to the insider is modelled by Brownian filtrations progressively enlarged with the times of either the global maximum or minimum of the underlying risky asset price over the infinite time interval, which is not a stopping time in the filtration generated by the underlying risky asset. We show that the optimal exercise times are the first times at which the asset price process reaches either lower or upper stochastic boundaries depending on the current values of its running maximum or minimum given the occurrence of times of either the global maximum or minimum, respectively. The proof is based on the reduction of the original problems into the necessarily three-dimensional optimal stopping problems and the equivalent free-boundary problems. We apply either the normal-reflection or the normal-entrance conditions as well as the smooth-fit conditions for the value functions to characterise the candidate boundaries as either the maximal or minimal solutions to the associated first-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations and the transcendental arithmetic equations, respectively.2025-07-04T10:47:50ZPavel V. GapeevLibo Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03565v2The geometry of financial institutions -- Wasserstein clustering of financial data2025-07-03T19:38:08ZThe increasing availability of granular and big data on various objects of interest has made it necessary to develop methods for condensing this information into a representative and intelligible map. Financial regulation is a field that exemplifies this need, as regulators require diverse and often highly granular data from financial institutions to monitor and assess their activities. However, processing and analyzing such data can be a daunting task, especially given the challenges of dealing with missing values and identifying clusters based on specific features.
To address these challenges, we propose a variant of Lloyd's algorithm that applies to probability distributions and uses generalized Wasserstein barycenters to construct a metric space which represents given data on various objects in condensed form. By applying our method to the financial regulation context, we demonstrate its usefulness in dealing with the specific challenges faced by regulators in this domain. We believe that our approach can also be applied more generally to other fields where large and complex data sets need to be represented in concise form.2023-05-05T14:16:29ZLorenz RiessMathias BeiglböckJohannes TemmeAndreas WolfJulio Backhoffhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07703v3Nash equilibria for dividend distribution with competition2025-07-03T16:16:53ZWe construct Nash equilibria in feedback form for a class of two-person stochastic games of singular control with absorption, arising from a stylized model for corporate finance. More precisely, the paper focusses on a strategic dynamic game in which two financially-constrained firms operate in the same market. The firms distribute dividends and are faced with default risk. The strategic interaction arises from the fact that if one firm defaults, the other one becomes a monopolist and increases its profitability. The firms choose their dividend distribution policies from a class of randomised strategies and we identify two types of equilibria, depending on the firms' initial endowments. In both situations the optimal strategies and the equilibrium payoffs are found explicitly.2023-12-12T20:06:44Z37 pages, 1 figure, minor modificationsTiziano De AngelisFabien GensbittelStéphane Villeneuvehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07052v1Quantifying Bounded Rationality: Formal Verification of Simon's Satisficing Through Flexible Stochastic Dominance2025-07-02T06:51:36ZThis paper introduces Flexible First-Order Stochastic Dominance (FFSD), a mathematically rigorous framework that formalizes Herbert Simon's concept of bounded rationality using the Lean 4 theorem prover. We develop machine-verified proofs demonstrating that FFSD bridges classical expected utility theory with Simon's satisficing behavior through parameterized tolerance thresholds. Our approach yields several key results: (1) a critical threshold $\varepsilon < 1/2$ that guarantees uniqueness of reference points, (2) an equivalence theorem linking FFSD to expected utility maximization for approximate indicator functions, and (3) extensions to multi-dimensional decision settings. By encoding these concepts in Lean 4's dependent type theory, we provide the first machine-checked formalization of Simon's bounded rationality, creating a foundation for mechanized reasoning about economic decision-making under uncertainty with cognitive limitations. This work contributes to the growing intersection between formal mathematics and economic theory, demonstrating how interactive theorem proving can advance our understanding of behavioral economics concepts that have traditionally been expressed only qualitatively.2025-07-02T06:51:36ZJingyuan LiZhou Linhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00853v1Ranking Quantilized Mean-Field Games with an Application to Early-Stage Venture Investments2025-07-01T15:24:14ZQuantilized mean-field game models involve quantiles of the population's distribution. We study a class of such games with a capacity for ranking games, where the performance of each agent is evaluated based on its terminal state relative to the population's $α$-quantile value, $α\in (0,1)$. This evaluation criterion is designed to select the top $(1-α)\%$ performing agents. We provide two formulations for this competition: a target-based formulation and a threshold-based formulation. In the former and latter formulations, to satisfy the selection condition, each agent aims for its terminal state to be \textit{exactly} equal and \textit{at least} equal to the population's $α$-quantile value, respectively.
For the target-based formulation, we obtain an analytic solution and demonstrate the $ε$-Nash property for the asymptotic best-response strategies in the $N$-player game. Specifically, the quantilized mean-field consistency condition is expressed as a set of forward-backward ordinary differential equations, characterizing the $α$-quantile value at equilibrium. For the threshold-based formulation, we obtain a semi-explicit solution and numerically solve the resulting quantilized mean-field consistency condition.
Subsequently, we propose a new application in the context of early-stage venture investments, where a venture capital firm financially supports a group of start-up companies engaged in a competition over a finite time horizon, with the goal of selecting a percentage of top-ranking ones to receive the next round of funding at the end of the time horizon. We present the results and interpretations of numerical experiments for both formulations discussed in this context and show that the target-based formulation provides a very good approximation for the threshold-based formulation.2025-07-01T15:24:14ZRinel Foguen TchuendomDena FirooziMichèle Bretonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20340v2Relative portfolio optimization via a value at risk based constraint2025-06-30T08:53:36ZIn this paper, we consider $n$ agents who invest in a general financial market that is free of arbitrage and complete. The aim of each investor is to maximize her expected utility while ensuring, with a specified probability, that her terminal wealth exceeds a benchmark defined by her competitors' performance. This setup introduces an interdependence between agents, leading to a search for Nash equilibria. In the case of two agents and CRRA utility, we are able to derive all Nash equilibria in terms of terminal wealth. For $n>2$ agents and logarithmic utility we distinguish two cases. In the first case, the probabilities in the constraint are small and we can characterize all Nash equilibria. In the second case, the probabilities are larger and we look for Nash equilibria in a certain set. We also discuss the impact of the competition using some numerical examples. As a by-product, we solve some portfolio optimization problems with probability constraints.2025-03-26T09:06:29Z28 pages, 17 figuresNicole BäuerleTamara Göllhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00158v2Robust No-Arbitrage under Projective Determinacy2025-06-28T08:26:16ZDrawing on set theory, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the structural condition of mathematical finance under Knightian uncertainty. We adopt a projective framework in which all components of the model -- prices, priors and trading strategies -- are treated uniformly in terms of measurability. This contrasts with the quasi-sure setting of Bouchard and Nutz, in which prices are Borel-measurable and graphs of local priors are analytic sets, while strategies and stochastic kernels inherit only universal measurability. In our projective framework, we establish several characterizations of the robust no-arbitrage condition, already known in the quasi-sure setting, but under significantly more elegant and consistent assumptions. These characterisations have important applications, in particular, the existence of solutions to the robust utility maximization problem. To do this, we work within the classical Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC), augmented by the axiom of Projective Determinacy (PD). The (PD) axiom, a well-established axiom of descriptive set theory, guarantees strong regularity properties for projective sets and projective functions.2025-03-31T19:13:33ZAlexandre BoistardLaurence CarassusSafae Issaouihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08513v2The Euler Scheme for Fractional Stochastic Delay Differential Equations with Additive Noise2025-06-26T13:52:13ZIn this paper we consider the Euler-Maruyama scheme for a class ofstochastic delay differential equations driven by a fractional Brownian motion with index $H\in(0,1)$. We establish the consistency of the scheme and study the rate of convergence of the normalized error process. This is done by checking that the generic rate of convergence of the error process with stepsize $Δ_{n}$ is $Δ_{n}^{\min\{H+\frac{1}{2},3H,1\}}$. It turned out that such a rate is suboptimal when the delay is smooth and $H>1/2$. In this context, and in contrast to the non-delayed framework, we show that a convergence of order $H+1/2$ is achievable.2024-02-13T15:06:44ZOrimar Saurihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02869v2Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers2025-06-24T20:44:53ZAutomated Market Makers (AMMs) are emerging as a popular decentralised trading platform. In this work, we determine the optimal dynamic fees in a constant function market maker. We find approximate closed-form solutions to the control problem and study the optimal fee structure. We find that there are two distinct fee regimes: one in which the AMM imposes higher fees to deter arbitrageurs, and another where fees are lowered to increase volatility and attract noise traders. Our results also show that dynamic fees that are linear in inventory and are sensitive to changes in the external price are a good approximation of the optimal fee structure and thus constitute suitable candidates when designing fees for AMMs.2025-06-03T13:34:28Z18 pagesLeonardo BaggianiMartin HerdegenLeandro Sánchez-Betancourthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19715v1Neural Functionally Generated Portfolios2025-06-24T15:22:16ZWe introduce a novel neural-network-based approach to learning the generating function $G(\cdot)$ of a functionally generated portfolio (FGP) from synthetic or real market data. In the neural network setting, the generating function is represented as $G_θ(\cdot)$, where $θ$ is an iterable neural network parameter vector, and $G_θ(\cdot)$ is trained to maximise investment return relative to the market portfolio. We compare the performance of the Neural FGP approach against classical FGP benchmarks. FGPs provide a robust alternative to classical portfolio optimisation by bypassing the need to estimate drifts or covariances. The neural FGP framework extends this by introducing flexibility in the design of the generating function, enabling it to learn from market dynamics while preserving self-financing and pathwise decomposition properties.2025-06-24T15:22:16Z10 pages, 2 figuresMichael MonoyiosOlivia Priciliahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19494v1Benchmark-Neutral Risk-Minimization for insurance products and nonreplicable claims2025-06-24T10:30:37ZIn this paper we study the pricing and hedging of nonreplicable contingent claims, such as long-term insurance contracts like variable annuities. Our approach is based on the benchmark-neutral pricing framework of Platen (2024), which differs from the classical benchmark approach by using the stock growth optimal portfolio as the numéraire. In typical settings, this choice leads to an equivalent martingale measure, the benchmark-neutral measure. The resulting prices can be significantly lower than the respective risk-neutral ones, making this approach attractive for long-term risk-management.
We derive the associated risk-minimizing hedging strategy under the assumption that the contingent claim possesses a martingale decomposition. For a set of nonreplicable contingent claims, these strategies allow monitoring the working capital required to generate their payoffs and enable an assessment of the resulting diversification effects. Furthermore, an algorithmic refinancing strategy is proposed that allows modeling the working capital. Finally, insurance-finance arbitrages of the first kind are introduced and it is demonstrated that benchmark-neutral pricing effectively avoids such arbitrages.2025-06-24T10:30:37ZMichael SchmutzEckhard PlatenThorsten Schmidthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03776v9Understanding Short-Term Implied Volatility Dynamics: A Model-Independent Approach Beyond Stochastic Volatility2025-06-22T06:59:10ZThis study investigates the short-term asymptotic behavior of the implied volatility surface (IVS), with a particular focus on the at-the-money (ATM) skew and curvature, which are key determinants of the IVS shape and whose are widely concerned in the option market. Departing from conventional process-based models that rely on explicit stochastic differential equations, our work adopts a model-independent, distribution-based approach by imposing cumulant conditions on the asset's log return distribution. Under these broad assumptions, we derive a quadratic expansion for the implied volatility as a function of moneyness for near-the-money options, along with asymptotic expressions for the ATM skew and curvature as the time to maturity tends to zero. These results not only highlight the differences in the properties of ATM asymptotics among different types of models, but also offer a versatile framework for model calibration, including regular stochastic volatility, rough volatility, and discrete-time distribution-based models, using simple moment information. Overall, our findings provide robust analytical tools for the accurate approximation of short-term option prices and the evaluation of model performance against market stylized features.2024-01-08T09:59:26ZLiexin ChengXue Chenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16264v1Pricing under the Benchmark Approach2025-06-19T12:26:40ZThe paper summarizes key results of the benchmark approach with a focus on the concept of benchmark-neutral pricing. It applies these results to the pricing of an extreme-maturity European put option on a well-diversified stock index. The growth optimal portfolio of the stocks is approximated by a well-diversified stock portfolio and modeled by a drifted time-transformed squared Bessel process of dimension four. It is shown that the benchmark-neutral price of a European put option is theoretically the minimal possible price and the respective risk-neutral put price turns out to be significantly more expensive.2025-06-19T12:26:40Z22 pages, 2 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2407.01542Eckhard Platen