https://arxiv.org/api/f1clJwUye5qLeOCwWFd5zTpwO/A2026-03-25T00:17:27Z314725515http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23928v2Critical Dynamics of Random Surfaces and Multifractal Scaling2025-11-02T11:07:21ZThe critical dynamics of conformal field theories on random surfaces is investigated beyond the previously studied dynamics of the overall area and the genus. It is found that the evolution of the order parameter in physical time performs a generalization of the multifractal random walk. Accordingly, the higher moments of time variations of the order parameter exhibit multifractal scaling. The series of Hurst exponents is computed and illustrated at the examples of the Ising-, 3-state-Potts-, and general minimal models as well as $c=1$ models on a random surface. It is noted that some of these models can replicate the observed multifractal scaling in financial markets.2025-05-29T18:23:46Z30 pages, 3 figures. Significant revision: corrected the formula for the multifractal Hurst exponents, and added a second independent derivation of this formula. Added figures, references, and a comprehensive introduction and summaryChristof Schmidhuberhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00781v1Robust Hedging of path-dependent options using a min-max algorithm2025-11-02T03:26:27ZWe consider an investor who wants to hedge a path-dependent option with maturity $T$ using a static hedging portfolio using cash, the underlying, and vanilla put/call options on the same underlying with maturity $ t_1$, where $0 < t_1 < T$. We propose a model-free approach to construct such a portfolio. The framework is inspired by the \textit{primal-dual} Martingale Optimal Transport (MOT) problem, which was pioneered by \cite{beiglbock2013model}. The optimization problem is to determine the portfolio composition that minimizes the expected worst-case hedging error at $t_1$ (that coincides with the maturity of the options that are used in the hedging portfolio). The worst-case scenario corresponds to the distribution that yields the worst possible hedging performance. This formulation leads to a \textit{min-max} problem. We provide a numerical scheme for solving this problem when a finite number of vanilla option prices are available. Numerical results on the hedging performance of this model-free approach when the option prices are generated using a \textit{Black-Scholes} and a \textit{Merton Jump diffusion} model are presented. We also provide theoretical bounds on the hedging error at $T$, the maturity of the target option.2025-11-02T03:26:27ZPurba BanerjeeSrikanth IyerShashi Jainhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00532v4Robust utility maximisation under proportional transaction costs for càdlàg price processes2025-10-31T19:17:38ZWe consider robust utility maximisation in continuous-time financial markets with proportional transaction costs under model uncertainty. For this purpose, we work in the framework of Chau and Rásonyi (2019), where robustness is achieved by maximising the worst-case expected utility over a possibly uncountable class of models that are all given on the same underlying filtered probability space. In this setting, we give sufficient conditions for the existence of an optimal trading strategy, extending the result for utility functions on the positive half-line of Chau and Rásonyi (2019) from continuous to general strictly positive càdlàg price processes and from complete to incomplete filtrations. Our result allows us to provide a positive answer to an open question pointed out in Chau and Rásonyi (2019), and shows that the embedding into a countable product space is not essential.2022-11-01T15:37:28ZChristoph CzichowskyRaphael Huwylerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27384v1On effects of present-bias on carbon emission patterns towards a net zero target2025-10-31T11:21:15ZThis paper explores the optimal policy for using an allocated carbon emission budget over time with the objective to maximize profit, by explicitly taking into account present-biased preferences of decision-makers, accounting for time-inconsistent preferences. The setup can be adapted to be applicable for either a (present-biased) individual or also for a company which seeks a balance between production and emission schedules. In particular, we use and extend stochastic control techniques developed for optimal dividend strategies in insurance risk theory for the present purpose. The approach enables a quantitative analysis to assess the effects of present-bias, of sustainability awareness, and the efficiency of a potential carbon tax in a simplified model. In some numerical implementations, we illustrate in what way a higher degree of present-bias leads to excess emission patterns, while placing greater emphasis on sustainability reduces carbon emissions. Furthermore, we show that for low levels of carbon tax, its increase has a positive effect on curbing emissions, while beyond a certain threshold that marginal impact gets considerably weaker.2025-10-31T11:21:15ZHansjörg AlbrecherJinxia Zhuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25740v1A mathematical study of the excess growth rate2025-10-29T17:43:40ZWe study the excess growth rate -- a fundamental logarithmic functional arising in portfolio theory -- from the perspective of information theory. We show that the excess growth rate can be connected to the Rényi and cross entropies, the Helmholtz free energy, L. Campbell's measure of average code length and large deviations. Our main results consist of three axiomatic characterization theorems of the excess growth rate, in terms of (i) the relative entropy, (ii) the gap in Jensen's inequality, and (iii) the logarithmic divergence that generalizes the Bregman divergence. Furthermore, we study maximization of the excess growth rate and compare it with the growth optimal portfolio. Our results not only provide theoretical justifications of the significance of the excess growth rate, but also establish new connections between information theory and quantitative finance.2025-10-29T17:43:40Z54 pages, 2 figuresSteven CampbellTing-Kam Leonard Wonghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24467v1The Omniscient, yet Lazy, Investor2025-10-28T14:35:14ZWe formalize the paradox of an omniscient yet lazy investor - a perfectly informed agent who trades infrequently due to execution or computational frictions. Starting from a deterministic geometric construction, we derive a closed-form expected profit function linking trading frequency, execution cost, and path roughness. We prove existence and uniqueness of the optimal trading frequency and show that this optimum can be interpreted through the fractal dimension of the price path. A stochastic extension under fractional Brownian motion provides analytical expressions for the optimal interval and comparative statics with respect to the Hurst exponent. Empirical illustrations on equity data confirm the theoretical scaling behavior.2025-10-28T14:35:14ZStanisław M. S. Halkiewiczhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24128v1Extended HJB Equation for Mean-Variance Stopping Problem: Vanishing Regularization Method2025-10-28T07:06:29ZThis paper studies the time-inconsistent MV optimal stopping problem via a game-theoretic approach to find equilibrium strategies. To overcome the mathematical intractability of direct equilibrium analysis, we propose a vanishing regularization method: first, we introduce an entropy-based regularization term to the MV objective, modeling mixed-strategy stopping times using the intensity of a Cox process. For this regularized problem, we derive a coupled extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation system, prove a verification theorem linking its solutions to equilibrium intensities, and establish the existence of classical solutions for small time horizons via a contraction mapping argument. By letting the regularization term tend to zero, we formally recover a system of parabolic variational inequalities that characterizes equilibrium stopping times for the original MV problem. This system includes an additional key quadratic term--a distinction from classical optimal stopping, where stopping conditions depend only on comparing the value function to the instantaneous reward.2025-10-28T07:06:29ZYuchao DongHarry Zhenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11829v2Schrödinger bridge for generative AI: Soft-constrained formulation and convergence analysis2025-10-28T03:59:44ZGenerative AI can be framed as the problem of learning a model that maps simple reference measures into complex data distributions, and it has recently found a strong connection to the classical theory of the Schrödinger bridge problems (SBPs) due partly to their common nature of interpolating between prescribed marginals via entropy-regularized stochastic dynamics. However, the classical SBP enforces hard terminal constraints, which often leads to instability in practical implementations, especially in high-dimensional or data-scarce regimes. To address this challenge, we follow the idea of the so-called soft-constrained Schrödinger bridge problem (SCSBP), in which the terminal constraint is replaced by a general penalty function. This relaxation leads to a more flexible stochastic control formulation of McKean-Vlasov type.
We establish the existence of optimal solutions for all penalty levels and prove that, as the penalty grows, both the controls and value functions converge to those of the classical SBP at a linear rate. Our analysis builds on Doob's h-transform representations, the stability results of Schrödinger potentials, Gamma-convergence, and a novel fixed-point argument that couples an optimization problem over the space of measures with an auxiliary entropic optimal transport problem. These results not only provide the first quantitative convergence guarantees for soft-constrained bridges but also shed light on how penalty regularization enables robust generative modeling, fine-tuning, and transfer learning.2025-10-13T18:29:15Z31 pagesJin MaYing TanRenyuan Xuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22518v1Inverse Behavioral Optimization of QALY-Based Incentive Systems Quantifying the System Impact of Adaptive Health Programs2025-10-26T04:00:55ZThis study introduces an inverse behavioral optimization framework that integrates QALY-based health outcomes, ROI-driven incentives, and adaptive behavioral learning to quantify how policy design shapes national healthcare performance. Building on the FOSSIL (Flexible Optimization via Sample-Sensitive Importance Learning) paradigm, the model embeds a regret-minimizing behavioral weighting mechanism that enables dynamic learning from heterogeneous policy environments. It recovers latent behavioral sensitivities (efficiency, fairness, and temporal responsiveness T) from observed QALY-ROI trade-offs, providing an analytical bridge between individual incentive responses and aggregate system productivity. We formalize this mapping through the proposed System Impact Index (SII), which links behavioral elasticity to measurable macro-level efficiency and equity outcomes. Using OECD-WHO panel data, the framework empirically demonstrates that modern health systems operate near an efficiency-saturated frontier, where incremental fairness adjustments yield stabilizing but diminishing returns. Simulation and sensitivity analyses further show how small changes in behavioral parameters propagate into measurable shifts in systemic resilience, equity, and ROI efficiency. The results establish a quantitative foundation for designing adaptive, data-driven health incentive programs that dynamically balance efficiency, fairness, and long-run sustainability in national healthcare systems.2025-10-26T04:00:55Z29 pages, 6 figures. Under review at Health Care Management ScienceJinho ChaJustin YuJunyeol RyuEunchan Daniel ChaHyeyoung Hwanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21650v1Goal-based portfolio selection with fixed transaction costs2025-10-24T17:09:16ZWe study a goal-based portfolio selection problem in which an investor aims to meet multiple financial goals, each with a specific deadline and target amount. Trading the stock incurs a strictly positive transaction cost. Using the stochastic Perron's method, we show that the value function is the unique viscosity solution to a system of quasi-variational inequalities. The existence of an optimal trading strategy and goal funding scheme is established. Numerical results reveal complex optimal trading regions and show that the optimal investment strategy differs substantially from the V-shaped strategy observed in the frictionless case.2025-10-24T17:09:16ZErhan BayraktarBingyan HanJingjie Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21297v1Jump risk premia in the presence of clustered jumps2025-10-24T09:48:45ZThis paper presents an option pricing model that incorporates clustered jumps using a bivariate Hawkes process. The process captures both self- and cross-excitation of positive and negative jumps, enabling the model to generate return dynamics with asymmetric, time-varying skewness and to produce positive or negative implied volatility skews. This feature is especially relevant for assets such as cryptocurrencies, so-called ``meme'' stocks, G-7 currencies, and certain commodities, where implied volatility skews may change sign depending on prevailing sentiment. We introduce two additional parameters, namely the positive and negative jump premia, to model the market risk preferences for positive and negative jumps, inferred from options data. This enables the model to flexibly match observed skew dynamics. Using Bitcoin (BTC) options, we empirically demonstrate how inferred jump risk premia exhibit predictive power for both the cost of carry in BTC futures and the performance of delta-hedged option strategies.2025-10-24T09:48:45Z38 pages, 7 figures, 2 tablesFrancis LiuNatalie PackhamArtur Sepphttp://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09349v3Optimal stopping and divestment timing under scenario ambiguity and learning2025-10-24T07:08:54ZAiming to analyze the impact of environmental transition on the value of assets and on asset stranding, we study optimal stopping and divestment timing decisions for an economic agent whose future revenues depend on the realization of a scenario from a given set of possible futures. Since the future scenario is unknown and the probabilities of individual prospective scenarios are ambiguous, we adopt the smooth model of decision making under ambiguity aversion of Klibanoff et al (2005), framing the optimal divestment decision as an optimal stopping problem with learning under ambiguity aversion. We then prove a minimax result reducing this problem to a series of standard optimal stopping problems with learning. The theory is illustrated with two examples: the problem of optimally selling a stock with ambiguous drift, and the problem of optimal divestment from a coal-fired power plant under transition scenario ambiguity.2024-08-18T04:06:28Z40 pages, 7 figuresAndrea MazzonPeter Tankovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20763v1Consumption-Investment Problem in Rank-Based Models2025-10-23T17:35:44ZWe study a consumption-investment problem in a multi-asset market where the returns follow a generic rank-based model. Our main result derives an HJB equation with Neumann boundary conditions for the value function and proves a corresponding verification theorem. The control problem is nonstandard due to the discontinuous nature of the coefficients in rank-based models, requiring a bespoke approach of independent mathematical interest. The special case of first-order models, prescribing constant drift and diffusion coefficients for the ranked returns, admits explicit solutions when the investor is either (a) unconstrained, (b) abides by open market constraints or (c) is fully invested in the market. The explicit optimal strategies in all cases are related to the celebrated solution to Merton's problem, despite the intractability of constraint (b) in that setting.2025-10-23T17:35:44Z13 pagesDavid Itkinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20047v1Multivariate Variance Swap Using Generalized Variance Method for Stochastic Volatility models2025-10-22T21:54:15ZThis paper develops a novel framework for modeling the variance swap of multi-asset portfolios by employing the generalized variance approach, which utilizes the determinant of the covariance matrix of the underlying assets. By specifying the distribution of the log returns of the underlying assets under the Heston and Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (BNS) stochastic volatility frameworks, we derive closed-form solutions for the realized variance through the computation of the covariance generalization of multi-assets. To evaluate the robustness of the proposed model, we conduct simulations using nine different assets generated via the quantmod package. For a three-asset portfolio, analytical expressions for the multivariate variance swap are obtained under both the Heston and BNS models. Numerical experiments further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model through parameter testing, calibration, and validation.2025-10-22T21:54:15ZSemere GebresilassieMulue GebreslasieMinglian Linhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20017v1Simultaneously Solving Infinitely Many LQ Mean Field Games In Hilbert Spaces: The Power of Neural Operators2025-10-22T20:40:20ZTraditional mean-field game (MFG) solvers operate on an instance-by-instance basis, which becomes infeasible when many related problems must be solved (e.g., for seeking a robust description of the solution under perturbations of the dynamics or utilities, or in settings involving continuum-parameterized agents.). We overcome this by training neural operators (NOs) to learn the rules-to-equilibrium map from the problem data (``rules'': dynamics and cost functionals) of LQ MFGs defined on separable Hilbert spaces to the corresponding equilibrium strategy. Our main result is a statistical guarantee: an NO trained on a small number of randomly sampled rules reliably solves unseen LQ MFG variants, even in infinite-dimensional settings. The number of NO parameters needed remains controlled under appropriate rule sampling during training.
Our guarantee follows from three results: (i) local-Lipschitz estimates for the highly nonlinear rules-to-equilibrium map; (ii) a universal approximation theorem using NOs with a prespecified Lipschitz regularity (unlike traditional NO results where the NO's Lipschitz constant can diverge as the approximation error vanishes); and (iii) new sample-complexity bounds for $L$-Lipschitz learners in infinite dimensions, directly applicable as the Lipschitz constants of our approximating NOs are controlled in (ii).2025-10-22T20:40:20Z48 pagesDena FirooziAnastasis KratsiosXuwei Yang