https://arxiv.org/api/f1clJwUye5qLeOCwWFd5zTpwO/A2026-06-14T06:19:31Z324925515http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09471v7Time-Consistent Asset Allocation for Risk Measures in a Lévy Market2026-02-17T10:52:04ZFocusing on gains & losses relative to a risk-free benchmark instead of terminal wealth, we consider an asset allocation problem to maximize time-consistently a mean-risk reward function with a general risk measure which is i) law-invariant, ii) cash- or shift-invariant, and iii) positively homogeneous, and possibly plugged into a general function. Examples include (relative) Value at Risk, coherent risk measures, variance, and generalized deviation risk measures. We model the market via a generalized version of the multi-dimensional Black-Scholes model using $α$-stable Lévy processes and give supplementary results for the classical Black-Scholes model. The optimal solution to this problem is a Nash subgame equilibrium given by the solution of an extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation. Moreover, we show that the optimal solution is deterministic under appropriate assumptions.2023-05-16T14:30:47ZFießinger, F., & Stadje, M. (2025). Time-consistent asset allocation for risk measures in a Lévy market. European Journal of Operational Research, 321(2), 676-695Felix FießingerMitja Stadje10.1016/j.ejor.2024.09.049http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16595v2Empirical Analysis of the Model-Free Valuation Approach: Hedging Gaps, Conservatism, and Trading Opportunities2026-02-17T05:38:03ZIn this paper we study the quality of model-free valuation approaches for financial derivatives by systematically evaluating the difference between model-free super-hedging strategies and the realized payoff of financial derivatives using historical option prices from several constituents of the S&P 500 between 2018 and 2022.
Our study allows in particular to describe the realized gap between payoff and model-free hedging strategy empirically so that we can quantify to which degree model-free approaches are overly conservative. Our results imply that the model-free hedging approach is only marginally more conservative than industry-standard models such as the Heston-model while being model-free at the same time.
This finding, its statistical description and the model-independence of the hedging approach enable us to construct an explicit trading strategy which, as we demonstrate, can be profitably applied in financial markets, and additionally possesses the desirable feature with an explicit control of its downside risk due to its model-free construction preventing losses pathwise.2025-08-09T00:06:12ZZixing ChenYihan QiShanlan QueJulian SesterXiao Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15248v1Predicting Invoice Dilution in Supply Chain Finance with Leakage Free Two Stage XGBoost, KAN (Kolmogorov Arnold Networks), and Ensemble Models2026-02-16T23:00:39ZInvoice or payment dilution is the gap between the approved invoice amount and the actual collection is a significant source of non credit risk and margin loss in supply chain finance. Traditionally, this risk is managed through the buyer's irrevocable payment undertaking (IPU), which commits to full payment without deductions. However, IPUs can hinder supply chain finance adoption, particularly among sub-invested grade buyers. A newer, data-driven methods use real-time dynamic credit limits, projecting dilution for each buyer-supplier pair in real-time. This paper introduces an AI, machine learning framework and evaluates how that can supplement a deterministic algorithm to predict invoice dilution using extensive production dataset across nine key transaction fields.2026-02-16T23:00:39ZPavel KoptevVishnu KumarKonstantin MalkovGeorge ShapiroYury Vikhanovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15177v1Optimal investment under capital gains taxes2026-02-16T20:30:28ZWe generalize classical results on the existence of optimal portfolios in discrete time frictionless market models to models with capital gains taxes. We consider the realistic but mathematically challenging rule that losses do not trigger negative taxes but can only be offset against potential gains in the future. Central to the analysis is a well-known phenomenon from arbitrage-free markets with proportional transaction costs that does not exist in arbitrage-free frictionless markets: an investment in specific quantities of stocks that is completely riskless but may provide an advantage over holding money in the bank account. As a result of this phenomenon, on an infinite probability space, no-arbitrage does not imply that the set of attainable terminal wealth is closed in probability. We show closedness under the slightly stronger {\em no unbounded non-substitutable investment with bounded risk} condition.
As a by-product, we provide a proof that in discrete time frictionless models with short-selling constraints, no-arbitrage implies that the set of attainable terminal wealth is closed in probability -- even if there are redundant stocks.2026-02-16T20:30:28Z29 pages, 1 figureAlexander DimitrovChristoph Kühnhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14575v1Information-Theoretic Approach to Financial Market Modelling2026-02-16T09:11:42ZThe paper treats the financial market as a communication system, using four information-theoretic assumptions to derive an idealized model with only one parameter. State variables are scalar stationary diffusions. The model minimizes the surprisal of the market and the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the benchmark-neutral pricing measure and the real-world probability measure. The state variables, their sums, and the growth optimal portfolio of the stocks evolve as squared radial Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes in respective activity times.2026-02-16T09:11:42Z35 pages, 3 figuresEckhard Platenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05672v2Optimal Reinsurance under Endogenous Default and Background Risk2026-02-15T03:34:13ZThis paper studies an optimal reinsurance problem for a utility-maximizing insurer, subject to the reinsurer's endogenous default and background risk. An endogenous default occurs when the insurer's contractual indemnity exceeds the reinsurer's available reserve, which is random due to the background risk. We obtain an analytical solution to the optimal contract for two types of reinsurance contracts, differentiated by whether their indemnity functions depend on the reinsurer's background risk. The results shed light on the joint effect of the reinsurer's default and background risk on the insurer's reinsurance demand.2025-01-10T02:45:03ZZongxia LiangZhaojie RenBin Zou10.1017/asb.2026.10085http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13544v1Merton's Problem with Recursive Perturbed Utility2026-02-14T01:23:43ZThe classical Merton investment problem predicts deterministic, state-dependent portfolio rules; however, laboratory and field evidence suggests that individuals often prefer randomized decisions leading to stochastic and noisy choices. Fudenberg et al. (2015) develop the additive perturbed utility theory to explain the preference for randomization in the static setting, which, however, becomes ill-posed or intractable in the dynamic setting. We introduce the recursive perturbed utility (RPU), a special stochastic differential utility that incorporates an entropy-based preference for randomization into a recursive aggregator. RPU endogenizes the intertemporal trade-off between utilities from randomization and bequest via a discounting term dependent on past accumulated randomization, thereby avoiding excessive randomization and yielding a well-posed problem. In a general Markovian incomplete market with CRRA preferences, we prove that the RPU-optimal portfolio policy (in terms of the risk exposure ratio) is Gaussian and can be expressed in closed form, independent of wealth. Its variance is inversely proportional to risk aversion and stock volatility, while its mean is based on the solution to a partial differential equation. Moreover, the mean is the sum of a myopic term and an intertemporal hedging term (against market incompleteness) that intertwines with policy randomization. Finally, we carry out an asymptotic expansion in terms of the perturbed utility weight to show that the optimal mean policy deviates from the classical Merton policy at first order, while the associated relative wealth loss is of a higher order, quantifying the financial cost of the preference for randomization.2026-02-14T01:23:43Z24 pagesMin DaiYuchao DongYanwei JiaXun Yu Zhouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12104v1Liquidation Dynamics in DeFi and the Role of Transaction Fees2026-02-12T15:58:40ZLiquidation of collateral are the primary safeguard for solvency of lending protocols in decentralized finance. However, the mechanics of liquidations expose these protocols to predatory price manipulations and other forms of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). In this paper, we characterize the optimal liquidation strategy, via a dynamic program, from the perspective of a profit-maximizing liquidator when the spot oracle is given by a Constant Product Market Maker (CPMM). We explicitly model Oracle Extractable Value (OEV) where liquidators manipulate the CPMM with sandwich attacks to trigger profitable liquidation events. We derive closed-form liquidation bounds and prove that CPMM transaction fees act as a critical security parameter. Crucially, we demonstrate that fees do not merely reduce attacker profits, but can make such manipulations unprofitable for an attacker. Our findings suggest that CPMM transaction fees serve a dual purpose: compensating liquidity providers and endogenously hardening CPMM oracles against manipulation without the latency of time-weighted averages or medianization.2026-02-12T15:58:40Z28 pages, 9 figuresAgathe SadeghiZachary Feinsteinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00357v2Optimal nonparametric estimation of the expected shortfall risk2026-02-12T09:31:30ZWe address the problem of estimating the expected shortfall risk of a financial loss using a finite number of i.i.d. data. It is well known that the classical plug-in estimator suffers from poor statistical performance when faced with (heavy-tailed) distributions that are commonly used in financial contexts. Further, it lacks robustness, as the modification of even a single data point can cause a significant distortion. We propose a novel procedure for the estimation of the expected shortfall and prove that it recovers the best possible statistical properties (dictated by the central limit theorem) under minimal assumptions and for all finite numbers of data. Further, this estimator is adversarially robust: even if a (small) proportion of the data is maliciously modified, the procedure continuous to optimally estimate the true expected shortfall risk. We demonstrate that our estimator outperforms the classical plug-in estimator through a variety of numerical experiments across a range of standard loss distributions.2024-05-01T07:24:02ZTo appear in: SIAM Journal on Financial MathematicsDaniel BartlStephan Ecksteinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10785v1A novel approach to trading strategy parameter optimization using double out-of-sample data and walk-forward techniques2026-02-11T12:19:24ZThis study introduces a novel approach to walk-forward optimization by parameterizing the lengths of training and testing windows. We demonstrate that the performance of a trading strategy using the Exponential Moving Average (EMA) evaluated within a walk-forward procedure based on the Robust Sharpe Ratio is highly dependent on the chosen window size. We investigated the strategy on intraday Bitcoin data at six frequencies (1 minute to 60 minutes) using 81 combinations of walk-forward window lengths (1 day to 28 days) over a 19-month training period. The two best-performing parameter sets from the training data were applied to a 21-month out-of-sample testing period to ensure data independence. The strategy was only executed once during the testing period. To further validate the framework, strategy parameters estimated on Bitcoin were applied to Binance Coin and Ethereum. Our results suggest the robustness of our custom approach. In the training period for Bitcoin, all combinations of walk-forward windows outperformed a Buy-and-Hold strategy. During the testing period, the strategy performed similarly to Buy-and-Hold but with lower drawdown and a higher Information Ratio. Similar results were observed for Binance Coin and Ethereum. The real strength was demonstrated when a portfolio combining Buy-and-Hold with our strategies outperformed all individual strategies and Buy-and-Hold alone, achieving the highest overall performance and a 50 percent reduction in drawdown. A conservative fee of 0.1 percent per transaction was included in all calculations. A cost sensitivity analysis was performed as a sanity check, revealing that the strategy's break-even point was around 0.4 percent per transaction. This research highlights the importance of optimizing walk-forward window lengths and emphasizing the value of single-time out-of-sample testing for reliable strategy evaluation.2026-02-11T12:19:24Z40 pages, 8 figures, 11 tablesTomasz MroziewiczRobert Ślepaczukhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09887v1Partially Active Automated Market Makers2026-02-10T15:25:14ZWe introduce a new class of automated market maker (AMM), the \emph{partially active automated market maker} (PA-AMM). PA-AMM divides its reserves into two parts, the active and the passive parts, and uses only the active part for trading. At the top of every block, such a division is done again to keep the active reserves always being \(λ\)-portion of total reserves, where \(λ\in (0, 1]\) is an activeness parameter. We show that this simple mechanism reduces adverse selection costs, measured by loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR), and thereby improves the wealth of liquidity providers (LPs) relative to plain constant-function market makers (CFMMs). As a trade-off, the asset weights within a PA-AMM pool may deviate from their target weights implied by its invariant curve. Motivated by the optimal index-tracking problem literature, we also propose and solve an optimization problem that balances such deviation and the reduction of LVR.2026-02-10T15:25:14ZSunghun Kohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11731v2Transfer Learning (Il)liquidity2026-02-10T11:33:05ZThe estimation of the Risk Neutral Density (RND) implicit in option prices is challenging, especially in illiquid markets. We introduce the Deep Log-Sum-Exp Neural Network, an architecture that leverages Deep and Transfer learning to address RND estimation in the presence of irregular and illiquid strikes. We prove key statistical properties of the model and the consistency of the estimator. We illustrate the benefits of transfer learning to improve the estimation of the RND in severe illiquidity conditions through Monte Carlo simulations, and we test it empirically on SPX data, comparing it with popular estimation methods. Overall, our framework shows recovery of the RND in conditions of extreme illiquidity with as few as three option quotes.2025-12-12T17:16:38ZAndrea ContiGiacomo Morellihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08527v1Consumption-Investment with anticipative noise2026-02-09T11:17:13ZWe revisit the classical Merton consumption--investment problem when risky-asset returns are modeled by stochastic differential equations interpreted through a general $α$-integral, interpolating between Itô, Stratonovich, and related conventions. Holding preferences and the investment opportunity set fixed, changing the noise interpretation modifies the effective drift of asset returns in a systematic way.
For logarithmic utility and constant volatilities, we derive closed-form optimal policies in a market with $n$ risky assets: optimal consumption remains a fixed fraction of wealth, while optimal portfolio weights are shifted according to $θ_α^\ast = V^{-1}(μ-r\mathbf{1})+α\,V^{-1}\operatorname{diag}(V)\mathbf{1}$, where $V$ is the return covariance matrix and $\operatorname{diag}(V)$ denotes the diagonal matrix with the same diagonal as $V$. In the single-asset case this reduces to $θ_α^\ast=(μ-r)/σ^{2}+α$.
We then show that genuinely state-dependent effects arise when asset volatility is driven by a stochastic factor correlated with returns. In this setting, the $α$-interpretation generates an additional drift correction proportional to the instantaneous covariation between factor and return noise. As a canonical example, we analyze a Heston stochastic volatility model, where the resulting optimal risky exposure depends inversely on the current variance level.2026-02-09T11:17:13Z21 pagesMario AyalaBenjamin Vallejo Jiménezhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08120v1Optimal Quantum Speedups for Repeatedly Nested Expectation Estimation2026-02-08T20:55:12ZWe study the estimation of repeatedly nested expectations (RNEs) with a constant horizon (number of nestings) using quantum computing. We propose a quantum algorithm that achieves $\varepsilon$-error with cost $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-1})$, up to logarithmic factors. Standard lower bounds show this scaling is essentially optimal, yielding an almost quadratic speedup over the best classical algorithm. Our results extend prior quantum speedups for single nested expectations to repeated nesting, and therefore cover a broader range of applications, including optimal stopping. This extension requires a new derandomized variant of the classical randomized Multilevel Monte Carlo (rMLMC) algorithm. Careful de-randomization is key to overcoming a variable-time issue that typically increases quantized versions of classical randomized algorithms.2026-02-08T20:55:12ZYihang SunGuanyang WangJose Blanchethttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06415v1Joint survival annuity derivative valuation in the linear-rational Wishart mortality model2026-02-06T06:14:04ZThis study proposes a linear-rational joint survival mortality model based on the Wishart process. The Wishart process, which is a stochastic continuous matrix affine process, allows for a general dependency between the mortality intensities that are constructed to be positive. Using the linear-rational framework along with the Wishart process as state variable, we derive a closed-form expression for the joint survival annuity, as well as the guaranteed joint survival annuity option. Exploiting our parameterisation of the Wishart process, we explicit the distribution of the mortality intensities and their dependency. We provide the distribution (density and cumulative distribution) of the joint survival annuity. We also develop some polynomial expansions for the underlying state variable that lead to fast and accurate approximations for the guaranteed joint survival annuity option. These polynomial expansions also significantly simplify the implementation of the model. Overall, the linear-rational Wishart mortality model provides a flexible and unified framework for modelling and managing joint mortality risk.2026-02-06T06:14:04ZJose Da FonsecaPatrick Wong