https://arxiv.org/api/eoSnPmpiKpP97RAvYZZbxE/b0vs 2026-06-14T02:19:08Z 3249 195 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15963v1 2026-03-16T22:25:42Z

Auto-deleveraging (ADL) mechanisms are a critical yet understudied component of risk management on cryptocurrency futures exchanges. When available margin and other loss-absorbing resources are insufficient to cover losses following large price moves, exchanges reduce positions and socialize losses among solvent participants via rule-based ADL protocols. We formulate ADL as an optimization problem that minimizes the exchange's risk of loss arising from future equity shortfalls. In a single-asset, isolated-margin setting, we show that under a risk-neutral expected loss objective the unique optimal policy minimizes the maximum leverage among participants. The resulting design has a transparent structure: positions are reduced first for the most highly levered accounts, and leverage is progressively equalized via a water-filling (or ``leverage-draining'') rule. This policy is distribution-free, wash-trade resistant, Sybil resistant, and path-independent. It provides a canonical and implementable benchmark for ADL design and clarifies the economic logic underlying queue-based mechanisms used in practice. We further study the multi-asset, cross-margin setting, where the ADL problem becomes genuinely multi-dimensional: the exchange must allocate a vector of required reductions across accounts with portfolios exposed to correlated price moves. We show that under an expected-loss objective the problem remains separable across accounts after introducing asset-level shadow prices, yielding a scalable numerical method. We observe that naive gross leverage can be misleading in this context as it ignores hedging within portfolios. When asset prices are driven by a single dominant risk factor, the optimal policy again takes a water-filling form, but now in a factor-adjusted notion of leverage, so that more effectively hedged portfolios are deleveraged less aggressively.

2026-03-16T22:25:42Z Steven Campbell Natascha Hey Ciamac C. Moallemi Marcel Nutz http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15947v1 2026-03-16T21:53:00Z

We study cubic cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization, a higher-order extension of the standard Markowitz formulation where three-way sector co-movement terms augment the quadratic risk-return objective. Classical heuristics like simulated annealing (SA) and tabu search require Rosenberg quadratization of these cubic interactions. This inflates the variable count from n to 5n and introduces penalty terms that substantially distort the augmented search landscape. In contrast, Hyper-Adaptive Momentum Dynamics (HAMD) operates directly on the native higher-order objective using a hybrid pipeline combining continuous Hamiltonian search, exact cardinality-preserving projection, and iterated local search (ILS). On a cubic portfolio benchmark under matched 60-second CPU budgets, HAMD achieves substantially lower decoded native cubic objective values than SA and tabu search, yielding single-seed relative improvements of 87.9%, 71.2%, 59.5%, and 46.9% at n = 200, 300, 500, and 1000. In a detailed three-seed study at n = 200, HAMD attains a median native objective of 195.65 (zero variance), while SA and tabu yield 1208.07. Decoded-feasibility analysis shows SA satisfies all exact cardinality and Rosenberg auxiliary constraints, yet decodes to a native objective 80-88% worse than HAMD, demonstrating a surrogate-distortion effect rather than simple infeasibility. Exact calibration on small instances (n = 20, 25, 30) confirms HAMD finds the provably global optimum in 9/9 trials. These results demonstrate that native higher-order search offers a substantial advantage over quadratized surrogate optimization for constrained cubic portfolio problems.

2026-03-16T21:53:00Z 15 pages, 0 figures, 10 tables. Reference implementation and benchmark reproduction scripts available at: https://github.com/symplectic-opt/hamd-community Greg Serbarinov http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15369v1 2026-03-16T14:44:36Z

This work evaluates the impact of contagious cyber-events, over a finite horizon, on firms' financial health and on a cyber insurance portfolio. Our approach builds on key empirical findings from economics and cybersecurity. In economics, firm size and growth-rate distributions are non-Gaussian and exhibit heavy tails. In cybersecurity, contagion dynamics strongly depend on firm size and environmental conditions. To capture these features, we propose a stochastic multi-group SIR model coupled with a granular model of firm growth. This framework allows us to quantify the financial impact of cyber-attacks on firms' revenues and on the insurer's portfolio. In the model, the arrival time and duration of cyber-attacks are driven by a combination of a Cox process and a Bernoulli random variable. The Cox process represents external contagion, with an intensity given by the force of infection derived from the stochastic SIR dynamics. The Bernoulli component captures contagion originating from an infected sister or subsidiary firm. Environmental variability enables stochastic scenario generation and the computation of aggregate exceedance probabilities, a standard metric in catastrophe modeling that provides insurers with immediate insight into the financial severity of an event. We apply the framework to the LockBit ransomware attacks observed between May and July 2024. For a portfolio of 2,929 firms located in Ile-de-France, the model predicts that, with 50% probability, the insurer will need to compensate losses equivalent to up to two days of revenue over a 100-day cyber incident.

2026-03-16T14:44:36Z 38 pages, 14 figures Caroline Hillairet Olivier Lopez Lionel Sopgoui http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02488v10 2026-03-16T03:01:46Z

The classical Markowitz mean-variance model uses variance as a risk measure and calculates frontier portfolios in closed form by using standard optimization techniques. For general mean-risk models such closed form optimal portfolios are difficult to obtain. In this note, assuming returns follow the class of normal mean-variance mixture (NMVM) distributions, we obtain closed form expressions for frontier portfolios under mean-risk criteria when risk is modeled by the general class of law invariant convex risk measures. To achieve this goal, we first present a sufficient condition for the stochastic dominance relation on NMVM models and we apply this result to derive closed form solution for frontier portfolios. Our main result in this paper states that when return vectors follow the class of NMVM distributions the associated mean-risk frontier portfolios can be obtained by optimizing a Markowitz mean-variance model with an appropriately adjusted return vector.

2022-02-05T04:39:54Z 21pages Hasanjan Sayit http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14557v1 2026-03-15T19:08:39Z

Banks must optimize risky investments, dividend payouts, and capital structure under tight Basel III solvency and liquidity constraints, while costly equity issuance serves as a distress-recovery tool. We formulate this as a stochastic control problem that reduces the high-dimensional balance-sheet dynamics to a tractable one-dimensional process in the leverage ratio, with state-dependent investment limits. The resulting policy is simple and interpretable: pay dividends at an upper reflection barrier and, when needed, recapitalize only at the distress boundary, jumping to a unique target level. We characterize these thresholds analytically and show their sensitivity to regulatory parameters. From a regulatory viewpoint, we solve an outer optimization problem that maps the efficient frontier between shareholder value and survival probability (via Monte Carlo), with and without leverage caps. Results highlight that tightening solvency requirements often yields the best safety-profitability trade-off.

2026-03-15T19:08:39Z Erhan Bayraktar Etienne Chevalier Vathana Ly Vath Yuqiong Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14024v1 2026-03-14T16:55:43Z

Whenever dealing with horizons of different times scales, risk evaluation of losses may incur in both interest rate uncertainty and horizon risk as introduced in [11]. With the goal to capture both effects, we work with cash subadditive fully-dynamic risk measures. In this work we consider such measures obtained via the BSDE and the shortfall approaches. We stress that we consider BSDEs both with Lipschitz and quadratic drivers. We then introduce the hq-entropic risk measure on losses as an effective example of fully-dynamic risk measure serving the scope. Shortfall risk measures are extended to capture cash non-additivity. For our newly introduced h-generalized shortfall risk measures we provide a dual representation and we connect them to fully-dynamic certainty equivalent. To conclude, we can see that the hq-entropic risk measures on losses belong to the family h-generalized shortfall, but they are not of certainty equivalent type. We note that the classical entropic risk measure, besides being generated by a BSDE, is also both a shortfall and a certainty equivalent.

2026-03-14T16:55:43Z Giulia Di Nunno Emanuela Rosazza Gianin http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24605v1 2026-03-14T14:40:58Z

Martingale Optimal Transport (MOT) provides a framework for robust pricing and hedging of illiquid derivatives. Classical MOT enforces exact calibration of model marginals to the mid-prices of vanilla options. Motivated by the industry practice of fitting bid and ask marginals to vanilla prices, we introduce a relaxation of MOT in which model-implied volatilities are only required to lie within observed bid--ask spreads; equivalently, model marginals lie between the bid and ask marginals in convex order. The resulting Bid--Ask MOT (BAMOT) yields realistic price bounds for illiquid derivatives and, via strong duality, can be interpreted as the superhedging price when short and long positions in vanilla options are priced at the bid and ask, respectively. We further establish convergence of BAMOT to classical MOT as bid--ask spreads vanish, and quantify the convergence rate using a novel distance intrinsically linked to bid--ask spreads. Finally, we support our findings with several synthetic and real-data examples.

2026-03-14T14:40:58Z 37 pages Bryan Liang Marcel Nutz Shunan Sheng Valentin Tissot-Daguette http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15088v2 2026-03-14T07:16:38Z

Stochastic differential equations (SDEs) driven by fractional Brownian motion (fBm) are increasingly used to model systems with rough dynamics and long-range dependence, such as those arising in quantitative finance and reliability engineering. However, these processes are non-Markovian and lack a semimartingale structure, rendering many classical parameter estimation techniques inapplicable or computationally intractable beyond very specific cases. This work investigates two central questions: (i) whether integrating path signatures into deep learning architectures can improve the trade-off between estimation accuracy and model complexity, and (ii) what constitutes an effective architecture for leveraging signatures as feature maps. We introduce SigMA (Signature Multi-head Attention), a neural architecture that integrates path signatures with multi-head self-attention, supported by a convolutional preprocessing layer and a multilayer perceptron for effective feature encoding. SigMA learns model parameters from synthetically generated paths of fBm-driven SDEs, including fractional Brownian motion, fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck, and rough Heston models, with a particular focus on estimating the Hurst parameter and on joint multi-parameter inference, and it generalizes robustly to unseen trajectories. Extensive experiments on synthetic data and two real-world datasets (i.e., equity-index realized volatility and Li-ion battery degradation) show that SigMA consistently outperforms CNN, LSTM, vanilla Transformer, and Deep Signature baselines in accuracy, robustness, and model compactness. These results demonstrate that combining signature transforms with attention-based architectures provides an effective and scalable framework for parameter inference in stochastic systems with rough or persistent temporal structure.

2025-12-17T05:09:18Z Xianglin Wu Chiheb Ben Hammouda Cornelis W. Oosterlee http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13632v1 2026-03-13T22:26:29Z

We investigate the performance of the Kelly rule in a setting in which the dynamics of the return is represented by a time change process. We find that in this general semi-martingale setting the Kelly rule does not maximize the average growth rate, unless the log-return is normally distributed. Namely, the investment position proposed by the Kelly rule is too large, and the investor could achieve a higher average growth rate by investing less aggressively. The higher the variance of the stochastic clock, the more material the failure of the Kelly rule. The ruin threshold proposed by Thorp (1969) is closer, even though examples based on stochastic clock variance estimates taken from the literature show that Kelly rule investment remains safely in the ruin-free region. Finally, the goal of keeping the investment below the ruin threshold for a family of stochastic clock distributions generates a long term investment problem that parallels the "acceptable investment" theory.

2026-03-13T22:26:29Z 20 pages, 3 figures Umberto Cherubini http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13170v1 2026-03-13T17:03:59Z

We establish a microstructural foundation of the rough Bergomi model. Specifically, we consider a sequence of order driven financial market models where orders to buy or sell an asset arrive according to a Poisson process and have a long lasting impact on volatility. Using a recently established C-tightness result for càdlàg processes we establish the weak convergence of the price-volatility process to a log-normal rough volatility model. Our weak convergence result is accompanied by weak error rates that employ a recently established Clark-Ocone formula for Poisson processes and turn our microstructure model into viable alternative to classical simulation schemes. The weak error rates strongly hinge on Poisson arrival dynamics and are novel to the rough microstructure literature.

2026-03-13T17:03:59Z 43 pages Paul P. Hager Ulrich Horst Thomas Wagenhofer Wei Xu http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03551v2 2026-03-13T14:38:40Z

Under Solvency II, the Value-at-Risk (VaR) is applied, although there is broad consensus that the Expected Shortfall (ES) constitutes a more appropriate risk measure. Moving towards ES would necessitate specifying the corresponding ES level. The recently introduced Probability Equivalent Level of VaR and ES (PELVE) determines this by requiring that ES equals the prescribed VaR for a given future payoff, reflecting the situation of an individual insurer. We incorporate the regulator's perspective by proposing PELVE-inspired methods for multiple insurers. We analyze existence and uniqueness of the resulting ES levels, derive expressions for elliptically distributed payoffs and establish limit results for multivariate regularly distributed payoffs. A case study highlights that the choice of method is crucial when payoffs arise from different distribution families. We provide recommendations which of our PELVE-inspired methods are most appropriate in certain scenarios.

2025-11-05T15:33:07Z Christian Laudagé Jörn Sass http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00299v2 2026-03-13T14:36:05Z

We investigate the static portfolio selection problem of S-shaped and non-concave utility maximization under first-order and second-order stochastic dominance (SD) constraints. In many S-shaped utility optimization problems, one should require a liquidation boundary to guarantee the existence of a finite concave envelope function. A first-order SD (FSD) constraint can replace this requirement and provide an alternative for risk management. We explicitly solve the optimal solution under a general S-shaped utility function with a first-order stochastic dominance constraint. However, the second-order SD (SSD) constrained problem under non-concave utilities is difficult to solve analytically due to the invalidity of Sion's maxmin theorem. For this sake, we propose a numerical algorithm to obtain a plausible and sub-optimal solution for general non-concave utilities. The key idea is to detect the poor performance region with respect to the SSD constraints, characterize its structure and modify the distribution on that region to obtain (sub-)optimality. A key financial insight is that the decision maker should follow the SD constraint on the poor performance scenario while conducting the unconstrained optimal strategy otherwise. We provide numerical experiments to show that our algorithm effectively finds a sub-optimal solution in many cases. Finally, we develop an algorithm-guided piecewise-neural-network framework to learn the solution of the SSD problem, which demonstrates accelerated convergence compared to standard neural network approaches.

2025-11-29T03:41:35Z 30 pages Zeyun Hu Yang Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12602v1 2026-03-13T03:09:39Z

We consider the pricing of derivatives written on accumulated marks, such as weather derivatives or aggregate loss claims, using a self-exciting marked point process. The jump intensity mean-reverts between events and increases at jump times by an amount proportional to the mark. The resulting state process, where the variable $U_t$ accumulates jump magnitudes, is a piecewise deterministic Markov process (PDMP). We derive the discounted pricing equation as a backward partial integro-differential equation (PIDE) in two spatial dimensions. To overcome the dimensionality, we propose an exponential (Laplace/Fourier) transform in the accumulated mark variable, which diagonalizes the translation operator and reduces the pricing problem to a family of one-dimensional PIDEs in the intensity variable along a Bromwich contour. For Gamma-mixture mark laws (under actuarial or Esscher-tilted measures), the nonlocal jump term is efficiently approximated by generalized Gauss--Laguerre quadrature. We solve the reduced PIDEs backward in time using a monotone IMEX finite difference scheme (implicit upwind drift and discounting, explicit jump operator) and recover option prices via numerical inversion. We provide a rigorous, term-by-term global error bound covering time and space discretization, quadrature, interpolation, and boundary effects, supported by numerical experiments and Monte Carlo benchmarks.

2026-03-13T03:09:39Z 32 pages, 6 figures. Submitted to Decisions in Economics and Finance Aqib Ahmed Heiðar Eyjólfsson http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12375v1 2026-03-12T18:52:52Z

This paper introduces a no-arbitrage, Monte Carlo-free approach to pricing path-dependent interest rate derivatives. The Heath-Jarrow-Morton model gives arbitrage-free contingent claims prices but is infinite-dimensional, making traditional numerical methods computationally prohibitive. To make the problem computationally tractable, I cast the stochastic pricing problem as a deterministic partial differential equation (PDE). Finance-Informed Neural Networks (FINNs) solve this PDE directly by minimizing violations of the differential equation and boundary condition, with automatic differentiation efficiently computing the exact derivatives needed to evaluate PDE terms. FINNs achieve pricing accuracy within 0.04 to 0.07 cents per dollar of contract value compared to Monte Carlo benchmarks. Once trained, FINNs price caplets in a few microseconds regardless of dimension, delivering speedups ranging from 300,000 to 4.5 million times faster than Monte Carlo simulation as the state space discretization of the forward curve grows from 10 to 150 nodes. The major Greeks-theta and curve deltas-come for free, computed automatically during PDE evaluation at zero marginal cost, whereas Monte Carlo requires complete re-simulation for each sensitivity. The framework generalizes naturally beyond caplets to other path-dependent derivatives-caps, swaptions, callable bonds-requiring only boundary condition modifications while retaining the same core PDE structure.

2026-03-12T18:52:52Z Kevin Mott http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13325v2 2026-03-12T03:15:38Z

In this paper, we consider catastrophe stop-loss reinsurance valuation for a reinsurance company with dynamic contagion claims. To deal with conventional and emerging catastrophic events, we propose the use of a compound dynamic contagion process for the catastrophic component of the liability. Under the premise that there is an absence of arbitrage opportunity in the market, we obtain arbitrage-free premiums for these contracts. To this end, the Esscher transform is adopted to specify an equivalent martingale probability measure. We show that reinsurers have various ways of levying the security loading on the net premiums to quantify the catastrophic liability in light of the growing challenges posed by emerging risks arising from climate change, cyberattacks, and pandemics. We numerically compare arbitrage-free catastrophe stop-loss reinsurance premiums via the Monte Carlo simulation method. We also compare them with those from generalised compound Hawkes/compound Cox cases. Sensitivity analyses are performed by changing the retention level, the Esscher parameters and the intensity parameters.

2025-02-18T23:04:27Z Jiwook Jang Patrick J. Laub Tak Kuen Siu Hongbiao Zhao