https://arxiv.org/api/wFI5NdLK3TnzPl5VW7VSnAAbA+Y2026-06-13T12:32:33Z32491515http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05241v2On the Skew Stickiness Ratio2026-06-08T03:17:37ZThe skew stickiness ratio is a statistic that captures the joint dynamics of an asset price and its volatility. We derive a representation formula for this quantity using the Itô-Wentzell and Clark-Ocone formulae, and we apply it to analyze its asymptotics under Bergomi-type stochastic volatility models.2026-02-05T03:01:57ZMasaaki Fukasawahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08209v1Markets Are Not Random, They Are Hard to Predict2026-06-06T14:54:40ZFinancial returns are often called ``random,'' but the word conflates ontic chance, epistemic ignorance, strategic feedback, and model instability. This essay argues that financial markets are not random in the ontic sense in which a quantum measurement is random. They are causal economic systems whose future is hard to predict because relevant causes are hidden, costly to observe, strategically used, capacity constrained, and sometimes governed by a changing law. The formal language of finance already encodes this distinction. Prices live on filtered probability spaces because agents have partial information; derivatives are priced under a risk-neutral measure $\Q\ne\Prob$ because pricing is an instrumental change of measure rather than a statement about the real data-generating law; and no-arbitrage gives martingality under an equivalent pricing measure, not full predictability failure under every real-world information set. The paper separates no-arbitrage, informational efficiency, and net exploitability; uses the Doob decomposition to isolate risk-compensated predictable drift from martingale innovation; adds a capacity-and-survival layer explaining why positive signals need not be scalable; relates the $\Prob$--$\Q$ wedge to stochastic-discount-factor geometry and relative entropy; formalises filtration sufficiency, model-selection landscape risk, and intervention-stable causality; and connects reflexivity, microstructure, and Knightian ambiguity to a unified entropy ledger. The disciplined thesis is therefore not that markets are unknowable, nor that they are literally random. Markets are hard to predict, and hardest exactly where prediction is costly, competitive, self-defeating, capacity limited, or invalidated by regime change.2026-06-06T14:54:40ZMiquel Noguer i Alonsohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07445v1Bubbles vs. Baselines: Token Valuation and Institutional Capital in PoS Networks under EIP-15592026-06-05T16:47:23ZThis paper presents an open-economy macroeconomic equilibrium model for Proof-of-Stake (PoS) networks with fee-burn mechanics (EIP-1559) that formalizes the strategic interplay between a Kelly-optimizing rational institutional investor and a utility-driven retail consumer. We analyze network dynamics across two behavioral regimes. In The Unbounded Accumulation Model, the consumer purely accumulates tokens, creating an exclusive buy-side pressure that interacts with institutional portfolio rebalancing to fuel an ever-expanding speculative bubble and generate compounding excess returns for investors. Conversely, in The Utility-Consumption Model, the consumer dynamically buys and sells tokens to balance crypto wealth against real-world fiat consumption. Within this framework, we derive an explicit steady-state equilibrium price for ETH, demonstrating how token valuation anchors to a stable fundamental baseline that scales directly with network adoption while completely dissolving the institutional yield premium. Our numerical simulations show that while exogenous traditional finance (TradFi) shocks propagate through portfolio rebalancing to drive high token price volatility, network inflation remains highly stable. Furthermore, we prove that network security is insulated from institutional monopoly by counter-cyclical consumer behavior. Our findings reveal that institutional excess wealth creation in PoS ecosystems is not native to the staking protocol itself, but is strictly driven by the leveraged extraction of the retail consumer's continuous demand for transactional utility.2026-06-05T16:47:23ZMikhail Perepelitsahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13421v2Market Making and Transient Impact in Spot FX2026-06-05T16:18:28ZDealers in foreign exchange markets provide bid and ask prices to their clients at which they are happy to buy and sell, respectively. To manage risk, dealers can skew their quotes and hedge in the interbank market. Hedging offers certainty but comes with transaction costs and market impact. Optimal market making with execution has previously been addressed within the Almgren-Chriss market impact model, which includes instantaneous and permanent components. However, there is overwhelming empirical evidence of the transient nature of market impact, with instantaneous and permanent impacts arising as the two limiting cases. In this note, we consider an intermediate scenario and study the interplay between risk management and impact resilience.2026-01-19T22:09:03Z8 pages, 3 figuresAlexander Barzykinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07290v1Boundary behaviour of the Volterra square-root process2026-06-05T14:01:04ZIn this work, we study the boundary behaviour of the Volterra square- root process on $\mathbb{R}_+$. For regular Volterra kernels, we establish a time-dependent Feller condition that guarantees that the process does not hit zero on $[0, T]$, and prove finiteness of negative $p$-moments. For rough kernels that are regularly varying at zero, we show that the process necessarily hits zero with positive probability, and that its law has an atom at the boundary. Finally, for the limit distribution, we show that finiteness of negative moments is determined by the long-time asymptotics of the associated resolvent. In particular, while in the rough case the process has an atom at zero, its limit distribution has finite negative exponential moments. Our proofs are based on comparison principles for Volterra integral equations and generalized Riemann-Liouville fractional equations. The latter provide us with upper and lower bounds for the solution of the associated Volterra Riccati equation, and hence also on the asymptotics of the Laplace transform. As an application, we study the structure of equivalent martingale measures in the Volterra Heston model. For the rough case, we show that equivalent martingale measures exist only under very restrictive assumptions on the drift under the real-world measure.2026-06-05T14:01:04ZMartin FriesenStefan GerholdKristof Wiedermannhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06737v1Fast-excursion limit of the Heston model2026-06-04T21:43:22ZThis article introduces an unconventional model for price processes in finance that emerges from the classical Heston model under Mechkov's fast-reversion limit. This new fast-excursion Heston model exhibits instantaneous (i.e. fast) excursions through an interval of prices at each time, which are invisible to vanilla options but critical for hitting probabilities and continuously monitored exotics. Theoretically, the model provides a rare example of a non-degenerate limit of stochastic volatility models that escapes the Skorokhod topologies. This leads us to a class of interval-valued processes which exist as lifts of subordinated Levy processes, through the concept of selections in the theory of random closed sets. On the practical side, we show how the model can be simulated using price-time parametric representations, and utilise a purpose-built classical Heston simulation scheme in order to visualise convergence. Finally we demonstrate how this model raises hitting probabilities for barrier options considerably (of order 10% for one-month EURUSD options), due to taking excursion risk into account.2026-06-04T21:43:22Z28 pages, 7 figuresRyan McCrickerdhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06413v1Competition in Dealer Markets with Internalisation and Externalisation2026-06-04T17:15:54ZWe model a market with multiple dealers who compete for client order flow by dynamically updating their bid and ask quotes for a risky asset. Dealers aim to maximise expected profits while controlling inventory risk by skewing their quotes to attract offsetting order flow (internalisation) or by directly offloading positions in the market (externalisation). Using a variational approach, we derive a closed-form equilibrium for the resulting Nash competition, shedding light on key features of dealer market dynamics. We show that dealers relying on internalisation are compelled to increase their externalisation activity when competing with externalising dealers. This strategic shift in equilibrium leads to significantly higher hedging costs for all dealers and substantially wider spreads for clients.2026-06-04T17:15:54ZRobert BoyceEyal Neumanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06089v1Leveraging LLMs for Unstructured Claims Data Analysis2026-06-04T12:26:20ZActuaries rely primarily on structured numerical data for reserving and ratemaking, while valuable predictive information in unstructured text including medical records, adjuster notes, and call transcripts remains largely unused. Manual processing of these documents is time-consuming, inconsistent across reviewers, and unscalable. We present a proof-of-concept framework using large language models (LLMs) to extract structured actuarial variables from unstructured claims data.
We implement a two-stage processing architecture separating document-level extraction (Stage 1) from claim-level synthesis (Stage 2). A modular four-script Python pipeline processes synthetic FHIR-based claims data and real claims documents, extracting 36 actuarial variables across reserving, ratemaking, and claims management categories. We validate 14 core variables using two independent clinical expert reviewers scoring 20 synthetic claims on a five-point Likert rubric, achieving mean scores above 4.0 and a weighted kappa of 0.53. Integration with chain ladder reserving demonstrates practical actuarial value: severity-segmented analysis reduced reserve estimation error from 6.5% to 4.0%. The open-source implementation includes audit trails and confidence scoring, providing a replicable foundation for LLM-based actuarial variable extraction in property-casualty insurance.2026-06-04T12:26:20Z41 pages, 6 figures, 3 tables. Code available at https://github.com/mdsight/llm-claims-analysis . Technical Specification Requirement included as Appendix D. Funded by the Casualty Actuarial Society Artificial Intelligence Working GroupRobert D. LieberthalLieberthal and Associates, LLCRichard TranMDSight, LLCVietbao PhanThomas Jefferson UniversityJawand SinghLieberthal and Associates, LLCWilliam and Mary UniversityElizabeth SottungThomas Jefferson Universityhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05900v1Derivative-Informed Operator Learning for Finance: On-the-Fly Greeks, Surfaces, Hedging, and Control2026-06-04T09:06:18ZFinancial decision systems require fast surrogate models for pricing, calibration, hedging, XVA, stress testing, and portfolio optimization. Standard neural surrogates reproduce prices or risk quantities, but downstream tasks depend as much on derivatives: deltas, vegas, curve and credit-spread sensitivities, exposure and objective gradients. We formulate a derivative-informed operator-learning framework in which the learned map -- a neural operator, random-feature operator, or finite-dimensional surrogate -- is trained both to match a high-fidelity pricing or risk operator and to match directional Fréchet derivatives generated on the fly. The framework combines operator learning, adjoint algorithmic differentiation, tangent sensitivity equations, random sketching of Jacobian actions, and no-arbitrage constraints. We derive error bounds showing derivative accuracy controls local stress errors, hedging error, and optimizer instability, and that discrete-time hedging error is also governed by second-order (gamma) accuracy. A Black--Scholes network over eight seeds shows a tuned derivative weight cuts vega error by 40\% and delta error by 15\% while modestly improving prices, but not an unsupervised second-order Greek. Heston and Bates random-feature experiments reduce stochastic-volatility and jump-parameter sensitivity errors by 60--76\%. A random-feature DeepONet/Galerkin operator mapping instantaneous-volatility curves to dense price surfaces reduces out-of-sample JVP error by 44\% and price RMSE by 23\% over eight seeds; it also shows derivative consistency alone does not remove no-arbitrage violations, so economic constraints must be imposed explicitly. The framework gives a disciplined route from value-only surrogates to derivative-aware engines that output differentiable instruments for hedging, risk, and control.2026-06-04T09:06:18ZMiquel Noguer I Alonsohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05631v1Stress Amplified Resilience: ESG and Joint Fragility in Equity Markets2026-06-04T02:59:28ZMarket stress rarely harms investors through one channel alone. Losses, volatility spikes, and deteriorating tradability often arrive together. We examine whether ESG is associated with lower exposure to clustered fragility in equity markets. Using monthly data on S&P 500 constituents from 2014 to 2025, we study downside returns, volatility, illiquidity, and a cofragility state that captures their joint occurrence within the same firm month. The evidence supports a stress-amplified resilience interpretation rather than an unconditional ESG return premium. In the return channel, the ESG association is concentrated in the extreme downside tail during stress months. In the volatility channel, higher ESG is associated with smaller risk spikes when aggregate conditions are weak. In the illiquidity channel, the association is more persistent, suggesting a liquidity-quality component whose relevance increases when market-wide trading conditions deteriorate. The central evidence comes from the joint analysis: a one-standard-deviation increase in ESG lowers the stress-period probability of severe cofragility by 0.92 percentage points, about 9% relative to the baseline. Double Machine Learning shows a similar negative ESG association after flexible adjustment for observable firm characteristics. Pillar evidence suggests stronger baseline resilience for Environmental scores and clearer stress amplification for Social scores. Overall, the findings characterize ESG as a multi-channel fragility signal for tail-risk monitoring, stress analysis, and pillar-level ESG assessment.2026-06-04T02:59:28ZMinxuan HuJiayu YiZiheng ChenWenxi SunQishi Zhanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20047v2Pricing Variance Swap for Multi-Asset Stochastic Volatility Models2026-06-03T01:20:30ZThis paper develops a novel framework for modeling variance swap of multi-asset stochastic volatility models by employing determinant-based instantaneous generalized variance. In this setting the determinant of the covariance matrix captures the joint dispersion of the multivariate log-return dynamics. By specifying the distribution of the log returns of the underlying assets under the Heston and Barndorff-Nielsen & Shephard (BNS) stochastic volatility frameworks, we obtain an analytical pricing expression for multi-asset Heston formulation, while BNS formulation is treated through a tractable approximation. To evaluate the robustness of the proposed model, we conduct simulations using nine different assets generated via the quantmod package. For a three-asset portfolio, analytical expressions for the generalized variance swap are obtained under both the Heston and BNS models. Numerical experiments further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model through parameter testing, calibration, and validation.2025-10-22T21:54:15ZSemere GebresilassieMulue GebreslasieMinglian Linhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18723v2Deviations from Normality in a Financial Model without Short-selling2026-06-02T22:50:59ZWe present a variation of the well-known binomial model of asset prices. This variation is based on the interaction of a finite number of investors (grouped in two kinds, bulls and bears) with a single market maker, in an environment with bounds to short selling. We prove a formula for all the moments of the logarithmic returns and from that we derive the corresponding formula for the binomial model. As an application of the model, we show how to compute parameters in order to approximate given moments, enabling the modeling of skewness and excess kurtosis. We provide a concrete example of this procedure, using real data from a stock, and we present two plots revealing its convergence pattern. Finally, we generalize the framework to account for the possibility of more heterogeneous investors, and give the corresponding formula for the moments of the logarithmic returns, and the algorithm for fitting given moments.2025-05-24T14:47:16Z20 pages, 2 figuresNahuel I. Arcahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02945v1Infinite Horizon Optimal Consumption: Intertemporal Hedging under Epstein-Zin Preferences2026-06-01T22:53:18ZWe study an infinite-horizon optimal consumption-investment problem for an investor with Epstein-Zin stochastic differential utility with stochastic investment opportunities in an incomplete market. Risk aversion and intertemporal substitution are separated, and we work in the regime $θ\in(0,1)$, where there exists a unique generalised utility process for arbitrary non-negative progressively measurable consumption streams. Our main contribution is a variational characterisation of the value function. We show that the value function is the unique minimiser of a functional whose Euler-Lagrange equation coincides with the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation. Although the functional may be non-convex, the direct method yields existence, and we prove every minimiser is strictly positive, bounded, and classical. A verification theorem identifies any minimiser with the value function and gives feedback representations for optimal consumption and investment policies. The proof combines a change of measure to the myopic probability with uniqueness results for Epstein-Zin BSDEs and a perturbation argument for optimality. Examples with stochastic volatility, Gaussian excess returns, and fat-tailed excess returns illustrate the scope of the framework and its implications for intertemporal hedging.2026-06-01T22:53:18Z27 pagesErhan BayraktarEmmet Lawlesshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13103v2Delegated portfolio management with random default2026-06-01T22:35:17ZWe are considering the problem of optimal portfolio delegation between an investor and a portfolio manager under a random default time. We focus on a novel variation of the Principal-Agent problem adapted to this framework. We address the challenge of an uncertain investment horizon caused by an exogenous random default time, after which neither the agent nor the principal can access the market. This uncertainty introduces significant complexities in analyzing the problem, requiring distinct mathematical approaches for two cases: when the random default time falls within the initial time frame [0,T] and when it extends beyond this period. We develop a theoretical framework to model the stochastic dynamics of the investment process, incorporating the random default time. We then analyze the portfolio manager's investment decisions and compensation mechanisms for both scenarios. In the first case, where the default time could be unbounded, we apply traditional results from Backward Stochastic Differential Equations (BSDEs) and control theory to address the agent problem. In the second case, where the default time is within the interval [0,T], the problem becomes more intricate due to the degeneracy of the BSDE's driver. For both scenarios, we demonstrate that the contracting problem can be resolved by examining the existence of solutions to integro-partial Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equations in both situations. We develop a deep-learning algorithm to solve the problem in high-dimension with no access to the optimizer of the Hamiltonian function.2024-10-17T00:27:46Zv2: revised versionAlberto GennaroThibaut Mastroliahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2006.01542v7Explicit approximations of option prices via Malliavin calculus in a general stochastic volatility framework2026-06-01T07:33:13ZWe establish an explicit approximation formula for European put option prices within a general stochastic volatility model with time-dependent parameters. Our methodology is based on expansions of the mixing representation of the put option price as an expectation of the Black-Scholes formula, in which the resulting terms are calculated explicitly by Malliavin calculus. We obtain an explicit representation of the error generated by the expansion procedure, and bound it in terms of moments of functionals of the underlying volatility process. Under the assumption of piecewise-constant parameters, our approximation formulas become closed-form, and compatible with a proposed fast calibration scheme. Finally, we perform a numerical sensitivity analysis to investigate the quality of our approximation formula in the so-called Stochastic Verhulst model, and show that the errors are well within the acceptable range for application purposes.2020-06-02T12:07:44ZarXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1812.07803Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 488 (2026) 117795Kaustav DasNicolas Langrené10.1016/j.cam.2026.117795