https://arxiv.org/api/NkoZ81t7uwfoKfx0BfWc0TzO9do 2026-04-13T04:20:48Z 2963 615 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.11766v1 2022-11-12T01:01:28Z

No matter how much some gamblers occasionally win, as long as they continue to gamble, sooner or later they will lose more to the casino, which is the so-called long bet will lose. Our results demonstrate the counter-intuitive phenomenon, that gamblers involved in long bets will lose but casinos always advertise their unprofitable circumstances. Here we expose the law of inevitability behind long bet will loss by theoretically and experimentally demystifying the profitable mystery behind casinos under two-armed antique Mills Futurity slot machine. The main results straightforwardly elucidate that all casino projects are seemingly a fair gamble but essentially unfair, i.e., the casino's win rate is greater than 50%. We anticipate our assay to be a starting point for studying the fairness of more sophisticated multi-armed Futurity bandits based on the mathematical tool. In application, a fairness study of the Futurity bandits not only exposes the fraud of casinos for gamblers but also discloses discount marketing, bundled sales, or other induced consumption tactics.

2022-11-12T01:01:28Z Zengjing Chen Huaijin Liang Wei Wang Xiaodong Yan http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09624v1 2022-11-10T16:36:17Z

Lead recommendations for financial products such as funds or ETF is potentially challenging in investment space due to changing market scenarios, and difficulty in capturing financial holder's mindset and their philosophy. Current methods surface leads based on certain product categorization and attributes like returns, fees, category etc. to suggest similar product to investors which may not capture the holder's investment behavior holistically. Other reported works does subjective analysis of institutional holder's ideology. This paper proposes a comprehensive data driven framework for developing a lead recommendations system in holder's space for financial products like funds by using transactional history, asset flows and product specific attributes. The system assumes holder's interest implicitly by considering all investment transactions made and collects possible meta information to detect holder's investment profile/persona like investment anticipation and investment behavior. This paper focusses on holder recommendation component of framework which employs a bi-partite graph representation of financial holders and funds using variety of attributes and further employs GraphSage model for learning representations followed by link prediction model for ranking recommendation for future period. The performance of the proposed approach is compared with baseline model i.e., content-based filtering approach on metric hits at Top-k (50, 100, 200) recommendations. We found that the proposed graph ML solution outperform baseline by absolute 42%, 22% and 14% with a look ahead bias and by absolute 18%, 19% and 18% on completely unseen holders in terms of hit rate for top-k recommendations: 50, 100 and 200 respectively.

2022-11-10T16:36:17Z 6 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables Presented at a workshop in ACM AI in Finance conference Rachna Saxena Abhijeet Kumar Mridul Mishra http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03604v1 2022-11-07T14:50:37Z

We derive a closed-form expression capturing the degree of Relative Risk Aversion (RRA) of investors for non-"fair" lotteries. We argue that our formula is superior to earlier methods that have been proposed, as it is a function of only three variables. Namely, the Treasury yields, the returns and the market capitalization of a specific market index. Our formula, is tested on CAC 40, EURO, S&P 500 and STOXX 600, with respect to the market capitalization of each index, for different time periods. We deduce that the investors in these markets exhibit Decreasing Absolute Risk Aversion (DARA) through all the different time periods that we consider, while the degree of RRA has altered between being constant, decreasing or increasing. Furthermore, we propose a simple and intuitive way to measure the degree to which a wrong assumption with respect to the utility function of an investor will affect the structure of his portfolio. Our method is built on a two asset portfolio framework. Namely, a portfolio consisting of one risky and one risk-free asset. Applying our method, the empirical findings indicate that the weight invested in the risky asset varies substantially even among utility functions with similar characteristics.

2022-11-07T14:50:37Z George Samartzis Nikitas Pittis http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03287v1 2022-11-07T03:48:13Z

We study the liquidity commonality impact of local and foreign institutional investment in the Australian equity market in the cross-section and over time. We find that commonality in liquidity is higher for large stocks compared to small stocks in the cross-section of stocks, and the spread between the two has increased over the past two decades. We show that this divergence can be explained by foreign institutional ownership. This finding suggests that foreign institutional investment contributes to an increase in the exposure of large stocks to unexpected liquidity events in the local market. We find a positive association between foreign institutional ownership and commonality in liquidity across all stocks, particularly in large and mid-cap stocks. Correlated trading by foreign institutions explains this association. However, local institutional ownership is positively related to the commonality in liquidity for large-cap stocks only.

2022-11-07T03:48:13Z Acc.Fin. 62(2022)1231-1272 Reza Bradrania Robert Elliott Winston Wu 10.1111/acfi.12822 http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10178v1 2022-11-03T20:05:17Z

We discuss and analyze some recent literature that introduced pioneering methods in econophysics. In doing so, we review recent methods of estimating the volatility, volatility of volatility, and probability densities. These methods will have useful applications in econophysics and finance.

2022-11-03T20:05:17Z Moawia Alghalith 10.3389/fphy.2022.1050277 http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00871v1 2022-11-02T04:41:30Z

Changes in market conditions present challenges for investors as they cause performance to deviate from the ranges predicted by long-term averages of means and covariances. The aim of conditional asset allocation strategies is to overcome this issue by adjusting portfolio allocations to hedge changes in the investment opportunity set. This paper proposes a new approach to conditional asset allocation that is based on machine learning; it analyzes historical market states and asset returns and identifies the optimal portfolio choice in a new period when new observations become available. In this approach, we directly relate state variables to portfolio weights, rather than firstly modeling the return distribution and subsequently estimating the portfolio choice. The method captures nonlinearity among the state (predicting) variables and portfolio weights without assuming any particular distribution of returns and other data, without fitting a model with a fixed number of predicting variables to data and without estimating any parameters. The empirical results for a portfolio of stock and bond indices show the proposed approach generates a more efficient outcome compared to traditional methods and is robust in using different objective functions across different sample periods.

2022-11-02T04:41:30Z European Journal of Finance. 28 (2021) 1130-1156 Reza Bradrania Davood Pirayesh Neghab 10.1080/1351847X.2021.1960404 http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14518v1 2022-10-26T07:09:01Z

While startup valuations are influenced by revenues, risks, age, and macroeconomic conditions, specific causality is traditionally a black box. Because valuations are not disclosed, roles played by other factors (industry, geography, and intellectual property) can often only be guessed at. VC valuation research indicates the importance of establishing a factor-hierarchy to better understand startup valuations and their dynamics, suggesting the wisdom of hiring data-scientists for this purpose. Bespoke understanding can be established via construction of hierarchical prediction models based on decision trees and random forests. These have the advantage of understanding which factors matter most. In combination with OLS, the also tell us the circumstances of when specific causalities apply. This study explores the deterministic role of categorical variables on the valuation of start-ups (i.e. the joint-combination geographic, urban, and sectoral denomination-variables), in order to be able to build a generalized valuation scorecard approach. Using a dataset of 1,091 venture-capital investments, containing 1,044 unique EU and EEA, this study examines microeconomic, sectoral, and local-level impacts on startup valuation. In principle, the study relies on Fixedeffects and Joint-fixed-effects regressions as well as the analysis and exploration of divergent micropopulations and fault-lines by means of non-parametric approaches combining econometric and machinelearning techniques.

2022-10-26T07:09:01Z International Congress on Small Business (ICSB) World Congress, Jul 2022, Washington DC, United States Max Berre http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.10106v4 2022-10-25T16:08:11Z

A speculative agent with Prospect Theory preference chooses the optimal time to purchase and then to sell an indivisible risky asset to maximize the expected utility of the round-trip profit net of transaction costs. The optimization problem is formulated as a sequential optimal stopping problem and we provide a complete characterization of the solution. Depending on the preference and market parameters, the optimal strategy can be "buy and hold", "buy low sell high", "buy high sell higher" or "no trading". Behavioral preference and market friction interact in a subtle way which yields surprising implications on the agent's trading patterns. For example, increasing the market entry fee does not necessarily curb speculative trading, but instead it may induce a higher reference point under which the agent becomes more risk-seeking and in turn is more likely to trade.

2019-11-22T16:08:46Z Alex S. L. Tse Harry Zheng http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.02444v4 2022-10-20T23:53:48Z

This paper derives a robust on-line equity trading algorithm that achieves the greatest possible percentage of the final wealth of the best pairs rebalancing rule in hindsight. A pairs rebalancing rule chooses some pair of stocks in the market and then perpetually executes rebalancing trades so as to maintain a target fraction of wealth in each of the two. After each discrete market fluctuation, a pairs rebalancing rule will sell a precise amount of the outperforming stock and put the proceeds into the underperforming stock. Under typical conditions, in hindsight one can find pairs rebalancing rules that would have spectacularly beaten the market. Our trading strategy, which extends Ordentlich and Cover's (1998) "max-min universal portfolio," guarantees to achieve an acceptable percentage of the hindsight-optimized wealth, a percentage which tends to zero at a slow (polynomial) rate. This means that on a long enough investment horizon, the trader can enforce a compound-annual growth rate that is arbitrarily close to that of the best pairs rebalancing rule in hindsight. The strategy will "beat the market asymptotically" if there turns out to exist a pairs rebalancing rule that grows capital at a higher asymptotic rate than the market index. The advantages of our algorithm over the Ordentlich and Cover (1998) strategy are twofold. First, their strategy is impossible to compute in practice. Second, in considering the more modest benchmark (instead of the best all-stock rebalancing rule in hindsight), we reduce the "cost of universality" and achieve a higher learning rate.

2018-10-04T22:30:01Z This paper has been withdrawn by the author Cogent Economics & Finance (2019), 7: 1568657 Alex Garivaltis http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04603v2 2022-10-20T23:52:58Z

This paper studies a two-person trading game in continuous time that generalizes Garivaltis (2018) to allow for stock prices that both jump and diffuse. Analogous to Bell and Cover (1988) in discrete time, the players start by choosing fair randomizations of the initial dollar, by exchanging it for a random wealth whose mean is at most 1. Each player then deposits the resulting capital into some continuously-rebalanced portfolio that must be adhered to over $[0,t]$. We solve the corresponding `investment $φ$-game,' namely the zero-sum game with payoff kernel $\mathbb{E}[φ\{\textbf{W}_1V_t(b)/(\textbf{W}_2V_t(c))\}]$, where $\textbf{W}_i$ is player $i$'s fair randomization, $V_t(b)$ is the final wealth that accrues to a one dollar deposit into the rebalancing rule $b$, and $φ(\bullet)$ is any increasing function meant to measure relative performance. We show that the unique saddle point is for both players to use the (leveraged) Kelly rule for jump diffusions, which is ordinarily defined by maximizing the asymptotic almost-sure continuously-compounded capital growth rate. Thus, the Kelly rule for jump diffusions is the correct behavior for practically anybody who wants to outperform other traders (on any time frame) with respect to practically any measure of relative performance.

2018-12-11T18:43:09Z This paper has been withdrawn by the author Games 10(1), 8 (2019) Alex Garivaltis http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.00946v2 2022-10-20T23:52:11Z

In this paper, which is the third installment of the author's trilogy on margin loan pricing, we analyze $1,367$ monthly observations of the U.S. broker call money rate, which is the interest rate at which stock brokers can borrow to fund their margin loans to retail clients. We describe the basic features and mean-reverting behavior of this series and juxtapose the empirically-derived laws of motion with the author's prior theories of margin loan pricing (Garivaltis 2019a-b). This allows us to derive stochastic differential equations that govern the evolution of the margin loan interest rate and the leverage ratios of sophisticated brokerage clients (namely, continuous time Kelly gamblers). Finally, we apply Merton's (1974) arbitrage theory of corporate liability pricing to study theoretical constraints on the risk premia that could be generated in the market for call money. Apparently, if there is no arbitrage in the U.S. financial markets, the implication is that the total volume of call loans must constitute north of $70\%$ of the value of all leveraged portfolios.

2019-06-03T17:57:21Z This paper has been withdrawn by the author International Journal of Financial Studies, 7(4), 56 (2019) Alex Garivaltis 10.3390/ijfs7040056 http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01025v2 2022-10-20T23:33:35Z

This paper supplies two possible resolutions of Fortune's (2000) margin-loan pricing puzzle. Fortune (2000) noted that the margin loan interest rates charged by stock brokers are very high in relation to the actual (low) credit risk and the cost of funds. If we live in the Black-Scholes world, the brokers are presumably making arbitrage profits by shorting dynamically precise amounts of their clients' portfolios. First, we extend Fortune's (2000) application of Merton's (1974) no-arbitrage approach to allow for brokers that can only revise their hedges finitely many times during the term of the loan. We show that extremely small differences in the revision frequency can easily explain the observed variation in margin loan pricing. In fact, four additional revisions per three-day period serve to explain all of the currently observed heterogeneity. Second, we study monopolistic (or oligopolistic) margin loan pricing by brokers whose clients are continuous-time Kelly gamblers. The broker solves a general stochastic control problem that yields simple and pleasant formulas for the optimal interest rate and the net interest margin. If the author owned a brokerage, he would charge an interest rate of $(r+ν)/2-σ^2/4$, where $r$ is the cost of funds, $ν$ is the compound-annual growth rate of the S&P 500 index, and $σ$ is the volatility.

2019-06-03T18:57:56Z This paper has been withdrawn by the author Research in Economics (73)2, pp.199-207 (2019) Alex Garivaltis http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02216v2 2022-10-20T23:28:56Z

We consider a two-person trading game in continuous time whereby each player chooses a constant rebalancing rule $b$ that he must adhere to over $[0,t]$. If $V_t(b)$ denotes the final wealth of the rebalancing rule $b$, then Player 1 (the `numerator player') picks $b$ so as to maximize $\mathbb{E}[V_t(b)/V_t(c)]$, while Player 2 (the `denominator player') picks $c$ so as to minimize it. In the unique Nash equilibrium, both players use the continuous-time Kelly rule $b^*=c^*=Σ^{-1}(μ-r\textbf{1})$, where $Σ$ is the covariance of instantaneous returns per unit time, $μ$ is the drift vector of the stock market, and $\textbf{1}$ is a vector of ones. Thus, even over very short intervals of time $[0,t]$, the desire to perform well relative to other traders leads one to adopt the Kelly rule, which is ordinarily derived by maximizing the asymptotic exponential growth rate of wealth. Hence, we find agreement with Bell and Cover's (1988) result in discrete time.

2019-06-05T18:01:31Z This paper has been withdrawn by the author Economic Theory Bulletin, pp.1-9 (2018) Alex Garivaltis http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09704v2 2022-10-20T23:28:30Z

This note provides a neat and enjoyable expansion and application of the magnificent Ordentlich-Cover theory of "universal portfolios." I generalize Cover's benchmark of the best constant-rebalanced portfolio (or 1-linear trading strategy) in hindsight by considering the best bilinear trading strategy determined in hindsight for the realized sequence of asset prices. A bilinear trading strategy is a mini two-period active strategy whose final capital growth factor is linear separately in each period's gross return vector for the asset market. I apply Cover's ingenious (1991) performance-weighted averaging technique to construct a universal bilinear portfolio that is guaranteed (uniformly for all possible market behavior) to compound its money at the same asymptotic rate as the best bilinear trading strategy in hindsight. Thus, the universal bilinear portfolio asymptotically dominates the original (1-linear) universal portfolio in the same technical sense that Cover's universal portfolios asymptotically dominate all constant-rebalanced portfolios and all buy-and-hold strategies. In fact, like so many Russian dolls, one can get carried away and use these ideas to construct an endless hierarchy of ever more dominant $H$-linear universal portfolios.

2019-07-23T05:55:28Z This paper has been withdrawn by the author Alex Garivaltis http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.14820v2 2022-10-20T23:28:02Z

This paper studies the general relationship between the gearing ratio of a Leveraged ETF and its corresponding expense ratio, viz., the investment management fees that are charged for the provision of this levered financial service. It must not be possible for an investor to combine two or more LETFs in such a way that his (continuously-rebalanced) LETF portfolio can match the gearing ratio of a given, professionally managed product and, at the same time, enjoy lower weighted-average expenses than the existing LETF. Given a finite set of LETFs that exist in the marketplace, I give necessary and sufficient conditions for these products to be undominated in the price-gearing plane. In a beautiful application of the duality theorem of linear programming, I prove a kind of two-fund theorem for LETFs: given a target gearing ratio for the investor, the cheapest way to achieve it is to combine (uniquely) the two nearest undominated LETF products that bracket it on the leverage axis. This also happens to be the implementation that has the lowest annual turnover. For the writer's enjoyment, we supply a second proof of the Main Theorem on LETFs that is based on Carathéodory's theorem in convex geometry. Thus, say, a triple-leveraged ("UltraPro") exchange-traded product should never be mixed with cash, if the investor is able to trade in the underlying index. In terms of financial innovation, our two-fund theorem for LETFs implies that the introduction of new, undominated 2.5x products would increase the welfare of all investors whose preferred gearing ratios lie between 2x ("Ultra") and 3x ("UltraPro"). Similarly for a 1.5x product.

2021-06-28T15:56:05Z This paper has been withdrawn by the author Alex Garivaltis