https://arxiv.org/api/Qj0SO60L+v+ZfxCzeaQEOpVk2F82026-03-24T08:31:40Z29513015http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00138v1Regulatory Migration to Europe: ICO Reallocation Following U.S. Securities Enforcement2026-01-28T17:39:15ZThis paper examines whether a major U.S. regulatory clarification coincided with cross-border spillovers in crypto-asset entrepreneurial finance. We study the Securities and Exchange Commission's July 2017 DAO Report, which clarified the application of U.S. securities law to many initial coin offerings, and analyze how global issuance activity adjusted across regions. Using a comprehensive global dataset of ICOs from 2014 to 2021, we construct a region-month panel and evaluate issuance dynamics around the announcement. We document a substantial and persistent reallocation of ICO activity toward Europe following the DAO Report. In panel regressions with region and month fixed effects, Europe experiences an average post-2017 increase of approximately 14 additional ICOs per region-month relative to other regions, net of global market cycles. The results are consistent with cross-border regulatory spillovers in highly mobile digital-asset markets.2026-01-28T17:39:15ZKrishna SharmaKhemraj BhattIndra Girihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00121v1A Prior-Predictive Monte Carlo Framework for Pricing Complex Data Products in Data-Poor Markets2026-01-27T16:14:04ZPricing advanced data products - particularly in complex fields such as semiconductor manufacturing - is a fundamentally challenging task due to the sparsity of publicly available transaction data, and its frequent heterogeneity and confidentiality. While data value depends on multiple interacting factors, such as technical sophistication, quality, utility, and licensing rights, traditional pricing methods tend to rely on ad-hoc heuristics or require massive amounts of historical transaction data. In an increasingly data-based economy, we introduce a prior-predictive Monte Carlo framework that enables the generation of fair, consistent, and justified price ranges for data products in the absence of empirical data. By simulating many plausible pricing 'worlds' and deal configurations, the framework produces stable probabilistic price bands (e.g., P5/P50/P95) rather than single point estimates, creating an auditable and repeatable probabilistic pricing system with business realism enforced via constraint-truncated priors. The proposed model bridges traditional data pricing rooted in professional experience with a data-based approach that also allows for classical Bayesian updating as more transaction data is accumulated.2026-01-27T16:14:04ZAdam L. SiemiatkowskiVictor ZhirnovKashyap YellaiGabriella BeinTerresa Zimmermanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14969v3Market Beliefs about Open vs. Closed AI2026-01-26T16:19:36ZMarket expectations about AI's economic impact may influence interest rates. Previous work has shown that US bond yields decline around the release of a sample of mostly proprietary AI models (Andrews and Farboodi 2025). I extend this analysis to include also open weight AI models that can be freely used and modified. I find long-term bond yields shift in opposite directions following the introduction of open versus closed models. Patterns are similar for treasuries, corporate bonds, and TIPS. The different movements suggest that that markets may anticipate open and closed AI advances to have different economic implications, and that the cumulative impact of AI releases on bond yields may be more muted.2025-12-16T23:48:46ZDaniel Björkegrenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03708v3Implementing Optimal Taxation: A Constrained Optimization Framework for Tax Reform2026-01-22T07:54:46ZWhile optimal taxation theory provides clear prescriptions for tax design, translating these insights into actual tax codes remains difficult. Existing work largely offers theoretical characterizations of optimal systems, while practical implementation methods are scarce. Bridging this gap involves designing tax rules that meet theoretical goals, while accommodating administrative, distributional, and other practical constraints that arise in real-world reform. We develop a method casting tax reform as a constrained optimization problem by parametrizing the entire income tax code as a set of piecewise linear functions mapping tax-relevant inputs into liabilities and marginal rates. This allows users to impose constraints on marginal rate schedules, limits on income swings, and objectives like revenue neutrality, efficiency, simplicity, or distributional fairness that reflect both theoretical and practical considerations. The framework is computationally tractable for complex tax codes and flexible enough to accommodate diverse constraints, welfare objectives and behavioral responses. Whereas existing tools are typically used for ex-post `what-if' analysis of specific reforms, our framework explicitly incorporates real-world reform constraints and jointly optimizes across the full tax code. We illustrate the framework in several simulated settings, including a detailed reconstruction of the Dutch income tax system. For the Dutch case, we generate a family of reforms that smooth existing spikes in marginal tax rates to any desired cap, reduce the number of rules, and impose hard caps on income losses households can experience from the reform. We also introduce \texttt{TaxSolver}, an open-source package, allowing policymakers and researchers to implement and extend the framework.2025-07-21T18:29:45Z40 pages, 5 figuresMark VerhagenMenno SchellekensMichael Garstkahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08263v2A Blessing in Disguise: How DeFi Hacks Trigger Unintended Liquidity Injections into US Money Markets2026-01-22T06:30:11ZDo vulnerabilities in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) destabilize traditional short-term funding markets? While the prevailing "Contagion Hypothesis" posits that the liquidation of stablecoin reserves triggers fire-sale spirals that transmit distress to traditional markets , we document a robust "Flight-to-Quality" effect to the contrary. In the wake of major DeFi exploits, spreads on 3-month AA-rated commercial paper (CP) exhibit a paradoxical narrowing. We identify a "liquidity recycling" mechanism driving this outcome: capital fleeing DeFi protocols is re-intermediated into the traditional financial system via Prime Money Market Funds (MMFs) , where strict regulatory constraints (e.g., SEC Rule 2a-7) compel these funds to purchase high-quality paper. Our estimates indicate that this institutional demand shock quantitatively overwhelms the supply shock driven by stablecoin issuer redemptions. Rather than acting as vectors of financial contagion , these crypto native shocks serve as an inadvertent "safety valve" in segmented markets , providing transient liquidity support and effectively subsidizing borrowing costs for high-grade issuers in the real economy.2026-01-13T06:40:19ZFor the latest version, please visit https://download.ssrn.com/2026/1/22/5935576.pdfTingyi Linhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15911v2The Sleeping Beauty Problem: Sleeping Kelly is a Thirder2026-01-21T23:41:10ZThe Sleeping Beauty problem is a problem of imperfect recall that has received considerable attention. One approach to solving the Sleeping Beauty problem is to allow Sleeping Beauty to make decisions based on her beliefs, and then characterize what it takes for her decisions to be "rational". In particular, she can be allowed to make monetary bets based on her beliefs, with the assumption that she wants to gain wealth rather than lose it. However, this approach is often coupled with the assumption that Sleeping Beauty should maximize the expected value of her bets. Here, show that Sleeping Beauty maximizes the expected growth rate of her wealth as a "thirder" sizing bets using the Kelly Criterion under multiplicative dynamics. Furthermore, this position is shown to be impervious to Dutch books. By contrast, the "halfer" position is shown to be vulnerable to Dutch books under similar circumstances.2025-09-26T03:26:31ZBen Abramowitzhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14852v1Beyond Carr Madan: A Projection Approach to Risk-Neutral Moment Estimation2026-01-21T10:37:02ZWe propose a projection method to estimate risk-neutral moments from option prices. We derive a finite-sample bound implying that the projection estimator attains (up to a constant) the smallest pricing error within the span of traded option payoffs. This finite-sample optimality is not available for the widely used Carr--Madan approximation. Simulations show sizable accuracy gains for key quantities such as VIX and SVIX. We then extend the framework to multiple underlyings, deriving necessary and sufficient conditions under which simple options complete the market in higher dimensions, and providing estimators for joint moments. In our empirical application, we recover risk-neutral correlations and joint tail risk from FX options alone, addressing a longstanding measurement problem raised by Ross (1976). Our joint tail-risk measure predicts future joint currency crashes and identifies periods in which currency portfolios are particularly useful for hedging.2026-01-21T10:37:02ZTjeerd De Vrieshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13770v1Look-Ahead-Bench: a Standardized Benchmark of Look-ahead Bias in Point-in-Time LLMs for Finance2026-01-20T09:23:51ZWe introduce Look-Ahead-Bench, a standardized benchmark measuring look-ahead bias in Point-in-Time (PiT) Large Language Models (LLMs) within realistic and practical financial workflows. Unlike most existing approaches that primarily test inner lookahead knowledge via Q\\&A, our benchmark evaluates model behavior in practical scenarios. To distinguish genuine predictive capability from memorization-based performance, we analyze performance decay across temporally distinct market regimes, incorporating several quantitative baselines to establish performance thresholds. We evaluate prominent open-source LLMs -- Llama 3.1 (8B and 70B) and DeepSeek 3.2 -- against a family of Point-in-Time LLMs (Pitinf-Small, Pitinf-Medium, and frontier-level model Pitinf-Large) from PiT-Inference. Results reveal significant lookahead bias in standard LLMs, as measured with alpha decay, unlike Pitinf models, which demonstrate improved generalization and reasoning abilities as they scale in size. This work establishes a foundation for the standardized evaluation of temporal bias in financial LLMs and provides a practical framework for identifying models suitable for real-world deployment. Code is available on GitHub: https://github.com/benstaf/lookaheadbench2026-01-20T09:23:51ZMostapha BenhendaLAGAhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07256v5Market-Based Asset Price Probability2026-01-19T16:59:51ZThe random values and volumes of consecutive trades made at the exchange with shares of security determine its mean, variance, and higher statistical moments. The volume weighted average price (VWAP) is the simplest example of such a dependence. We derive the dependence of the market-based variance and 3rd statistical moment of prices on the means, variances, covariances, and 3rd moments of the values and volumes of market trades. The usual frequency-based assessments of statistical moments of prices are the limited case of market-based statistical moments if we assume that all volumes of consecutive trades with security are constant during the averaging interval. To forecast market-based variance of price, one should predict the first two statistical moments and the correlation of values and volumes of consecutive trades at the same horizon. We explain how that limits the number of predicted statistical moments of prices by the first two and the accuracy of the forecasts of the price probability by the Gaussian distribution. This limitation also reduces the reliability of Value-at-Risk by Gaussian approximation. The accounting for the randomness of trade volumes and the use of VWAP results in zero price-volume correlations. To study the price-volume empirical statistical dependence, one should calculate correlations of prices and squares of trade volumes or correlations of squares of prices and volumes. To improve the accuracy and reliability of large macroeconomic and market models like those developed by BlackRock's Aladdin, JP Morgan, and the U.S. Fed., the developers should explicitly account for the impact of random trade volumes and use market-based statistical moments of asset prices.2022-05-15T10:50:06Z18 pagesVictor Olkhovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00049v1Exploring the Interpretability of Forecasting Models for Energy Balancing Market2026-01-19T12:56:41ZThe balancing market in the energy sector plays a critical role in physically and financially balancing the supply and demand. Modeling dynamics in the balancing market can provide valuable insights and prognosis for power grid stability and secure energy supply. While complex machine learning models can achieve high accuracy, their black-box nature severely limits the model interpretability. In this paper, we explore the trade-off between model accuracy and interpretability for the energy balancing market. Particularly, we take the example of forecasting manual frequency restoration reserve (mFRR) activation price in the balancing market using real market data from different energy price zones. We explore the interpretability of mFRR forecasting using two models: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine and explainable boosting machine (EBM). We also integrate the two models, and we benchmark all the models against a baseline naive model. Our results show that EBM provides forecasting accuracy comparable to XGBoost while yielding a considerable level of interpretability. Our analysis also underscores the challenge of accurately predicting the mFRR price for the instances when the activation price deviates significantly from the spot price. Importantly, EBM's interpretability features reveal insights into non-linear mFRR price drivers and regional market dynamics. Our study demonstrates that EBM is a viable and valuable interpretable alternative to complex black-box AI models in the forecast for the balancing market.2026-01-19T12:56:41ZAccepted by Artificial Intelligence Science and Engineering. Copyright has been transferred to IEEEOskar VåleShiliang ZhangSabita MaharjanGro Klæboe10.23919/AISE.2025.000020http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11958v1Autonomous Market Intelligence: Agentic AI Nowcasting Predicts Stock Returns2026-01-17T08:27:53ZCan fully agentic AI nowcast stock returns? We deploy a state-of-the-art Large Language Model to evaluate the attractiveness of each Russell 1000 stock daily, starting from April 2025 when AI web interfaces enabled real-time search. Our data contribution is unique along three dimensions. First, the nowcasting framework is completely out-of-sample and free of look-ahead bias by construction: predictions are collected at the current edge of time, ensuring the AI has no knowledge of future outcomes. Second, this temporal design is irreproducible -- once the information environment passes, it can never be recreated. Third, our framework is 100% agentic: we do not feed the model news, disclosures, or curated text; it autonomously searches the web, filters sources, and synthesises information into quantitative predictions. We find that AI possesses genuine stock selection ability, but only for identifying top winners. Longing the 20 highest-ranked stocks generates a daily Fama-French five-factor plus momentum alpha of 18.4 basis points and an annualised Sharpe ratio of 2.43. Critically, these returns derive from an implementable strategy trading highly liquid Russell 1000 constituents, with transaction costs representing less than 10\% of gross alpha. However, this predictability is highly concentrated: expanding beyond the top tier rapidly dilutes alpha, and bottom-ranked stocks exhibit returns statistically indistinguishable from the market. We hypothesise that this asymmetry reflects online information structure: genuinely positive news generates coherent signals, while negative news is contaminated by strategic corporate obfuscation and social media noise.2026-01-17T08:27:53ZZefeng ChenDarcy Puhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22167v1The Widening Profitability Gap between Renewable and Fossil Power Firms in Europe2026-01-16T13:46:46ZMobilising private capital is a critical bottleneck of the energy transition, yet recent crisis-driven windfall profits for fossil power firms suggest that market signals may still favour carbon-intensive assets. Here we analyse a panel of 900 European power firms (2001-2023) to resolve whether these profits reflect a durable profitability advantage or a crisis-driven anomaly. Using machine-learning clustering and Bayesian model averaging, we identify a structural divergence: wind and solar portfolios exhibit rising profitability, with return on assets among wind-dominated firms increasing by over 6% between 2014 and 2023. Conversely, higher fossil portfolio shares are increasingly associated with lower profitability, with marginal effects reaching -4% by 2023, while renewable-dominated firms match or outperform their fossil-heavy counterparts across most European regions. These findings suggest that the record profits of fossil incumbents were distinct outliers, masking an ongoing decline in the profitability of carbon-intensive business models.2026-01-16T13:46:46Z10 pages, 4 figures, submitted to a journalRobin FischerAnton Pichlerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22166v1A Real-Options-Aware Multi-Criteria Framework for Ex-Ante Real Estate Redevelopment Use Selection2026-01-15T22:56:09ZA growing share of the existing real estate stock exhibits persistent underperformance that can no longer be explained by cyclical market phases or inadequate maintenance alone. In many cases, technically recoverable assets located in non-marginal contexts fail to generate economic value consistent with the capital immobilized. This condition reflects a structural misalignment between intended use and effective demand rather than episodic market weakness, and calls for a decision framework capable of integrating value, risk, complexity, and irreversibility in strategic use selection. This study proposes a decision-analytic framework for the ex-ante selection of intended use in real estate redevelopment processes. The framework integrates real-options logic on irreversibility and managerial flexibility with a multi-criteria decision-analysis structure, enabling comparative evaluation of expected economic value, market and operational risk, technical and managerial complexity, and time-to-income. By treating redevelopment primarily as a problem of strategic option selection rather than design or financial optimization, the framework operationalizes option value preservation through disciplined ex-ante screening. Illustrative cases demonstrate how this integration of real options reasoning and MCDA reduces over-complexification and misalignment across different asset types and urban contexts.2026-01-15T22:56:09Z35 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, decision-theoretic paper on investment under uncertaintyRoberto Garronehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13209v1LemonadeBench: Evaluating the Economic Intuition of Large Language Models in Simple Markets2026-01-14T16:54:02ZWe introduce LemonadeBench v0.5, a minimal benchmark for evaluating economic intuition, long-term planning, and decision-making under uncertainty in large language models (LLMs) through a simulated lemonade stand business. Models must manage inventory with expiring goods, set prices, choose operating hours, and maximize profit over a 30-day period-tasks that any small business owner faces daily. All models demonstrate meaningful economic agency by achieving profitability, with performance scaling dramatically by sophistication-from basic models earning minimal profits to frontier models capturing 70% of theoretical optimal, a greater than 10x improvement. Yet our decomposition of business efficiency across six dimensions reveals a consistent pattern: models achieve local rather than global optimization, excelling in select areas while exhibiting surprising blind spots elsewhere.2026-01-14T16:54:02ZAidan Vyashttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18801v1Design-Robust Event-Study Estimation under Staggered Adoption Diagnostics, Sensitivity, and Orthogonalisation2026-01-14T09:04:24ZThis paper develops a design-first econometric framework for event-study and difference-in-differences estimands under staggered adoption with heterogeneous effects, emphasising (i) exact probability limits for conventional two-way fixed effects event-study regressions, (ii) computable design diagnostics that quantify contamination and negative-weight risk, and (iii) sensitivity-robust inference that remains uniformly valid under restricted violations of parallel trends. The approach is accompanied by orthogonal score constructions that reduce bias from high-dimensional nuisance estimation when conditioning on covariates. Theoretical results and Monte Carlo experiments jointly deliver a self-contained methodology paper suitable for finance and econometrics applications where timing variation is intrinsic to policy, regulation, and market-structure changes.2026-01-14T09:04:24Z71 pages, 9 figures, 9 tables. arXiv submission: full theoretical development; Monte Carlo evidence (Section 8); replicable empirical application to staggered state banking deregulation (Section 9) comparing TWFE event-studies to heterogeneity-robust estimators with diagnostics (weights, pre-trends, placebo) and calibrated sensitivity analysis over (B,Γ,Δ(\mathcal{R}))Craig S Wright