https://arxiv.org/api/Qj0SO60L+v+ZfxCzeaQEOpVk2F8 2026-06-21T07:52:06Z 3022 30 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17624v2 2026-05-17T09:45:39Z

Should households buy their homes? Contrary to popular expert advice, our block-bootstrap lifecycle simulation provides an affirmative answer. Homeownership generates wealth and welfare gains relative to rent-for-life benchmarks that invest only in financial assets. It lowers household portfolio downside risk and improves retirement consumption and bequest outcomes. The gains reflect risk aversion, intertemporal substitution, leverage-induced trade-offs between consumption and the timing of home purchases, and the liquidity costs of homeownership. Their magnitude varies across labor income profiles, house price environments, and mortgage rates. Our findings suggest that homeownership can build wealth more effectively than common portfolio strategies, including all-equity portfolios.

2025-07-23T15:53:02Z Yang Bai Shize Li Jialu Shen http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14754v3 2026-05-16T14:06:56Z

This paper examines how the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect (SHHK Stock Connect) affects the A-H share price premium and whether the policy effect depends on pre-existing market efficiency. Using monthly data for 67 A-H dual-listed firms from 2011 to 2019, we estimate dynamic models using system GMM. We find that the implementation of SHHK Stock Connect is associated with an average 18.4% increase in the A-H price premium, indicating a widening rather than a narrowing of the A-H share price premium. More importantly, this effect is heterogeneous: the policy impact is more pronounced for firms operating in less efficient markets and weaker for those with higher efficiency. We find no significant pricing response at the announcement stage. These findings imply that financial liberalization does not necessarily promote cross-market price convergence; its effects depend on pre-existing market efficiency, suggesting that cross-border liberalization policies may be more effective when accompanied by improvements of market efficiency.

2026-02-16T13:58:36Z 30 pages, 3 figure,12 tables Jiaqi Liu Australian National University Chen Tang Australian National University http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16613v1 2026-05-15T20:32:29Z

We introduce a novel approach to emotion modeling that shifts the focus from identification to evaluation, addressing the limitations of discrete classification in applied domains such as finance. By constructing a dataset of emotional intensity scores and fine-tuning open-weight generative language models to output continuous values from 0-100, we demonstrate a more expressive, generalizable framework for sentiment and emotion analysis. Our findings not only outperform classification baselines but also reveal surprising generalization capabilities and transfer effects to related constructs such as sentiment and arousal. This work contributes to the interdisciplinary recontextualization of NLP by introducing emotion intensity evaluation as an alternative to classification, arguing that this shift better aligns with the needs of domains--such as finance--where the degree of emotional content is central to interpretation and decision-making.

2026-05-15T20:32:29Z 10 pages, no figures, 5 tables Francesco A. Fabozzi Dasol Kim William N. Goetzmann http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24366v2 2026-05-14T14:44:36Z

We study the microstructure of Polymarket, the largest on-chain prediction market, using a continuous tick-level archive of the public order-book feed (30 billion events over 52 days) joined to the authoritative on-chain trade record. On a pre-registered stratified panel of 600 markets we report eight stylized facts: a longshot spread premium; a depth profile closer to uniform than to top-of-book; a null block-clock alignment effect; broad maker-wallet diversity with a concentrated tail; category-conditional effective-spread differences; a sub-50 ms median archive-ingestion delay with a multi-second tail; a self-counterparty wash share with median 1% and a 22% upper tail (well below Cong et al. 2023's 25-70% for unregulated crypto venues -- a sanity bound, not an apples-to-apples reference); and a cross-sectional depth profile explained by market duration, price level, and volume, with no residual time-to-close effect. The paper also contributes a measurement result: trade direction inferred from Polymarket's public order-book feed agrees with on-chain ground truth on only ~59% of buckets (panel mean 0.615, 95% CI [0.58, 0.65]), well below the ~80% Lee-Ready accuracy on Nasdaq. The effective half-spread changes sign between feed- and on-chain trade directions on 67%/50% of markets across two 7-day windows; Kyle's lambda on 60%/43%. Microstructure work on Polymarket therefore needs to source trade direction from on-chain OrderFilled events; we release a replication package that performs the join.

2026-04-27T12:01:14Z 16 pages, 9 figures, 5 tables. JEL: G14, G12, G19, C58, L86. v2: scope narrowing in Section 3, SF2 redone with full per-level depth profile, SF8 reframed (time-to-close coefficient becomes NS once duration and p(1-p) are controlled). Replication: https://github.com/philippdubach/polymarket-microstructure ; Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19811426 Philipp D. Dubach http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02287v2 2026-05-14T04:11:16Z

April 2026 saw notable methodological convergence in the academic study of informed trading on decentralized prediction markets. Three approaches surfaced almost simultaneously: Mitts and Ofir (2026) apply a composite screen to over 210,000 wallet-market pairs; Gomez-Cram et al. (2026) apply an event-level sign-randomization test to Polymarket's complete transaction history, classifying 3.14% of accounts as "skilled winners" and separately flagging 1,950 accounts as "insiders" via a lifecycle heuristic; Nechepurenko (2026) develops the Information Leakage Score (ILS) framework, which quantifies per-market information front-loading at an article-derived public-event timestamp. This paper provides a methodological comparison. The central claim is that these are three distinct layers of detection, not competing methods on a single layer. Sign-randomization is best understood as an account-level test of persistent directional skill conditional on opportunity selection -- not a direct test of insider trading, and not a per-market measure. The heuristic insider flag is separate from the skill classifier, applies to a population the classifier excludes by design, and has unknown precision. The Polymarket sample pools politics, sports, crypto, and other categories with different information technologies, so a platform-wide "skilled winner" classification is mechanism-ambiguous. The January 2026 U.S.-Venezuela operation cluster, where the DOJ indictment of Master Sergeant Gannon Van Dyke provides a rare external enforcement benchmark, illustrates how the layers stack: lifecycle heuristics identify suspicious accounts; legal investigation addresses non-public-information possession; per-market scoring would quantify how much information was leaked into each contract. A combined pipeline gains in precision because each layer filters a different dimension.

2026-05-04T07:22:20Z v2 (May 2026): added Revision Note section. No methodological-comparison changes. 21 pages, 4 tables Maksym Nechepurenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02286v2 2026-05-14T04:09:11Z

This paper reports an end-to-end empirical evaluation of the deadline-Information Leakage Score (ILS-dl) extension introduced in the companion methodology paper. The deadline-ILS extends the original ILS to deadline-resolved prediction-market contracts, the dominant structural form of publicly documented insider trading on Polymarket. We anchor the evaluation in the 2026 U.S.-Iran conflict cluster of the ForesightFlow Insider Cases (FFIC) inventory, the largest documented deadline cluster. The evaluation has four parts: per-category exponential-hazard estimation, a single-case ILS-dl computation, cross-market wallet analysis, and methodological refinements. Hazard-rate estimation produces an adequate exponential fit for military-geopolitics markets (KS p = 0.426, half-life 2.9 days, n = 18) and a preliminary fit for corporate-disclosure markets (n = 5). The regulatory-decision category is rejected as bimodal (p = 0.023). On the largest applicable FFIC contract ("US forces enter Iran by April 30," $269M volume), the article-derived public-event timestamp yields ILS-dl = +0.113 versus a resolution-anchored proxy value of -0.331: a 0.444 shift in magnitude on opposite sides of zero, demonstrating that the extension distinguishes signal from proxy artefact. Pre-event drift is mild, and short-window variants (30-min, 2-hour) are exactly zero. Cross-market wallet analysis identifies 332 wallets active in both major Iran-cluster markets, but the available trade history covers only the resolution-settlement window. v2 (May 2026) corrects the hazard fit to the full Tier-3 population; the v1 estimate lies inside the v2 95% CI.

2026-05-04T07:22:13Z v2 (May 2026): hazard-rate fits updated to full Tier-3 population (n=18 for military_geopolitics, was n=9). v1 estimate lies inside v2 95% CI. Esports taxonomy correction applied. No conclusion changes. 11 pages, 6 tables Maksym Nechepurenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00493v2 2026-05-14T04:06:48Z

ForesightFlow is an Information Leakage Score (ILS) framework for detecting informed trading on decentralized prediction markets. For an event-resolved binary market, the score quantifies the fraction of the terminal information move priced in before the public news event. Three operational scope conditions (edge effect, non-trivial total move, anchor sensitivity) are stated as preconditions for interpretation. The score admits a Murphy-decomposition reading that connects label generation to the proper-scoring-rule literature. A pilot empirical evaluation surfaces three findings. First, a resolution-anchored proxy for the public-event timestamp does not separate event-resolved markets from a matched control population (Mann-Whitney p = 1e-6, separation reversed), demonstrating that proxy quality is itself a binding constraint. Second, the article-derived timestamp on a single high-stakes case shifts the score by 0.444 in magnitude relative to the proxy and lies on the opposite side of zero. Third, an audit of the publicly documented Polymarket insider record reveals that documented cases are systematically deadline-resolved, falling outside the original ILS scope (0 of 24 FFIC inventory markets satisfied original scope conditions). This last finding motivates a deadline-ILS extension introduced in Section 7, anchored at the public-event timestamp rather than the news timestamp, and equipped with a per-category exponential hazard baseline for the time-to-event distribution. The extension closes the gap between the methodology and the population in which insider trading has been empirically documented. An end-to-end evaluation of the extension on the 2026 U.S.-Iran conflict cluster is reported in a companion paper. We release the FFIC inventory, the resolution-typology classification of the 911,237-market corpus, and all code at github.com/ForesightFlow.

2026-05-01T08:04:29Z v2 (May 2026): added Revision Note section; No methodology changes. 41 pages, 12 tables, 4 figures Maksym Nechepurenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13320v1 2026-05-13T10:34:08Z

We conduct the first rigorous study of electricity price volatility for the full panel of electricity prices across three European generation zones. By interpreting the observed day-ahead prices as local averages of a latent price process governed by a stochastic partial differential equation, we develop estimators of the weekly integrated variance. The inherently infinite dimensional setting introduce several complications that are not relevant in the conventional finite dimensional semimartingale setting, and we spend considerable effort in dealing with these. In particular, we must account for both mean-reversion in prices and semigroup-smoothing in the estimated variance. We provide a detailed decomposition and interpretation of the empirical estimates across three vastly different European generation zones, namely Germany, Norway, and Spain. Our findings indicate that each zone has very different drivers of volatility, and that the impact of generation variables differs considerably. We document that leverage effects appear to be present at first sight, but disappear once we condition on suitable state variables, thereby showing that electricity price volatility does not generally exhibit asymmetric responses to price shocks.

2026-05-13T10:34:08Z Thomas K. Kloster Fred Espen Benth http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11180v1 2026-05-11T19:42:47Z

We show that under mild assumptions, the total value of information to informed traders in the market can be measured by the covariance between price changes and order flow. This covariance captures noise trader losses, which equal informed trader gains when market making is competitive. We estimate the value of information using high frequency data on US equities at about $3.5 million per year for the average stock. The aggregate value of information is about 0.04% of market cap, which is considerably lower than the 0.67% in fees investors pay each year searching for superior returns (French 2008). We discuss potential resolutions for these puzzling findings.

2026-05-11T19:42:47Z Ohad Kadan Asaf Manela http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10486v1 2026-05-11T12:44:29Z

The introduction of leverage on prediction-market event contracts raises three structurally distinct questions that have not been addressed jointly: how leverage changes manipulation incentives, how it interacts with informed-trading rents, and how regulatory frameworks should respond. This paper develops a theoretical framework for the first two and a synthesis of the existing regulatory landscape for the third. The principal analytical move is a two-axis manipulation taxonomy distinguishing market-price manipulation from real-world outcome manipulation, where the manipulator affects the underlying event itself. Continuous-underlying derivative markets generally do not make outcome manipulation a venue-level payoff channel; event-linked markets do. Within this taxonomy, leverage plays asymmetric roles: it scales market-price manipulation linearly but shifts the cost-benefit threshold for outcome manipulation, and it scales informed-trading rents in three ways (direct multiplication, Sharpe-ratio preservation, detection-cost amortization). Section 7 connects Paper 1's pre-emption and halt-protocol findings (CC-007b, CC-008) to three manipulation channels: pre-emption introduced by the dynamic-margin engine, halt-arbitrage introduced by the resolution-zone halt protocol, and strategic bad-debt-shifting that no engine in Paper 1's framework family addresses. The framework's manipulation-resistance contribution is a re-allocation of attack surface, not a net reduction. The regulatory synthesis covers principal jurisdictions (US, EU, UK, Singapore, offshore) and identifies three regulatory-arbitrage pathways. The paper concludes with 14 recommendations for venue operators, regulatory bodies, and the research community, separated into framework-independent and framework-conditional categories.

2026-05-11T12:44:29Z 53 pages including 14 recommendations and limitations. Code: https://github.com/ForesightFlow/event-linked-perps. Empirical anchoring uses Paper 1's CC-007b and CC-008 counterfactual replay results Maksym Nechepurenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10428v1 2026-05-11T12:03:35Z

Paper 1 of this research programme develops a resolution-aware risk-design framework for the simplest event-linked perpetual: a contract whose underlying tracks a single binary prediction-market probability through resolution. The instrument class is broader. Variants span conditional probabilities P(A|B), spreads p^A - p^B, weighted baskets sum w_i p^(i), derivatives on variance or entropy of the probability process, contracts on liquidity itself, perpetual-on-expiring-event roll structures, and funding-only derivatives with no settlement. Each variant inherits some framework components from the single-market binary case and requires its own design adaptations. This paper develops a formal taxonomy of seven pure-form canonical variants beyond the probability-index perpetual of Paper 1, organised along four orthogonal design axes: underlying geometry, temporal structure, settlement structure, and venue composition. The list is not exhaustive; combinations are not treated separately. For each variant we provide a precise payoff definition; an inheritance map identifying which Paper 1 components carry over, are modified, or fail; variant-specific design constraints; microstructure properties; empirical evaluability on the PMXT v2 archive; and limitations. Notable findings: the conditional variant admits a candidate non-portability proposition (denominator instability as the conditioning event becomes improbable); the spread variant requires a three-channel decomposition of resolution risk; the volatility/entropy variant avoids random binary terminal-collapse but introduces estimator-convention and entropy-decay issues; the basket variant requires multi-period jump-aware margin whose aggregation is correlation-dependent. The paper is theoretical primarily; it specifies how demonstrative time series can be constructed and provides evaluability criteria to guide future work.

2026-05-11T12:03:35Z 47 pages with 4 tables. Code: https://github.com/ForesightFlow/event-linked-perps. Theoretical taxonomy paper; empirical evaluation of variants is future work Maksym Nechepurenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10400v1 2026-05-11T11:41:44Z

We develop and counterfactually evaluate a resolution-aware risk-design framework (PIRAP) for perpetual futures whose underlying tracks a single binary prediction-market probability through resolution. The framework specifies six components: an index estimator combining mid-price, depth-weighted mid, and time-decayed VWAP; jump-aware tiered margin sized against bounded-event terminal-collapse magnitude; leverage compression schedule contracting toward resolution; resolution-aware funding rule with boundary-aware correction; a multi-stage halt protocol; and an eligibility framework. Two formal non-portability propositions establish that standard basis-only funding paired with continuous-vol static margin fails on bounded-event underlyings. Empirical evaluation uses Polymarket's PMXT v2 archive for 2026-04-21 to 2026-04-27 (13,298-market analysis sample passing adequacy gates from 61,087 ingested; 13,115 resolved within the empirical window for E3). E1 evaluates two pre-registered stylized facts; E2 conducts counterfactual replay across three engine configurations; E3 isolates the resolution-zone protocol's contribution. Results are mixed. Five pre-registered floors: stylized-fact floors (boundary depth asymmetry, terminal-jump magnitude) PASS; welfare-side directional floors (final-hour liquidation -6%, drawdown -5.1% pooled, median PnL +14%) two FAIL one PASS; E3 mechanic floors (final-hour liquidation -80% by halt construction PASS; bad-debt frequency +2.4% FAIL). Three of five materiality floors fail: the framework as specified does not validate deployment, but the empirical record establishes a halt-versus-margin scope distinction (halt addresses execution-channel risk; terminal-jump bad-debt remains margin-side) and documents a pre-emption trade-off constraining the dynamic-margin component. The paper concludes with structural recommendations and explicit non-deployable status.

2026-05-11T11:41:44Z 86 pages including appendices. Code: https://github.com/ForesightFlow/event-linked-perps. Data: PMXT v2 archive Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20107449 stylized-facts bundle; DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20108387 counterfactual-replay bundle) Maksym Nechepurenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02635v2 2026-05-09T14:31:59Z

This paper studies systemic-risk connectedness in the European insurance sector at three levels of granularity: across major segments of financial markets, across insurance subsectors, and across individual insurance companies. Using a common connectedness framework applied to returns, volatility, value-at-risk, and expected shortfall, we document that insurers are an important component of systemic-risk connectedness, especially during stress episodes. We also provide reduced-form evidence on economically relevant channels in the European institutional setting: aggregate insurer spillovers co-move with term spreads, sovereign spreads, and funding stress, and firm-level insurer-to-bank spillovers vary with sovereign risk and domestic sovereign-bond home bias in a way consistent with a balance-sheet channel. The analysis further reveals substantial heterogeneity across subsectors and identifies a stable core of systemically central insurers in firm-level networks.

2025-05-05T13:27:15Z Giovanni Bonaccolto Nicola Borri Andrea Consiglio Giorgio Di Giorgio http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08726v1 2026-05-09T06:21:10Z

This study investigates how cross-stock information diffusion, driven by both retail and institutional investors, influences excess comovement in the Chinese retail-dominated market and the U.S. institution-dominated market. Using data from 4,533 Chinese stocks and 4,517 U.S. stocks from 2010 to 2022, we identify three key findings. First, the dominant investor group in each market significantly drives excess comovement. Specifically, in China, compared with institution-driven diffusion, retail-driven information diffusion has a notably stronger effect on excess comovement. In contrast, in the U.S., institution-driven diffusion is the primary driver of excess comovement, surpassing the influence of retail-driven diffusion. Second, we identify investors' trading behavior as the underlying mechanism through which information diffusion affects excess comovement. Third, we observe a lead-lag relationship: stocks with faster retail-driven information diffusion exhibit comovement that precedes those with slower diffusion. Based on this finding, we further demonstrate that the predictive power of information diffusion varies across markets. In China, retail-driven diffusion shows strong and persistent predictability for excess comovement, whereas in the U.S., institution-driven diffusion exhibits similarly robust predictive capacity.

2026-05-09T06:21:10Z Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 106 (2026) 102258 Fei Ren Miao-Miao Yi Zhang-Hangjian Chen Xiang Gao 10.1016/j.intfin.2025.102258 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07352v1 2026-05-08T07:01:40Z

The disposition effect describes investors' irrational behavior of selling profitable assets too soon while holding onto losing assets for too long. This study examines the impact of transparency at the firm level on the disposition effect of individual investors who hold that company's stock. Our results show that an increase in corporate transparency significantly reduces the disposition effect. Further analysis reveals that for companies with greater transparency, when the held stock is profitable, investors' confidence in holding it increases, leading to a reduced bias toward selling profitable stocks. When the stock is held at a loss, investors' confidence in holding it weakens, but they often perceive the loss as temporary and maintain confidence in the company's long-term prospects, thus exacerbating the bias toward holding losing stocks. The effect of increased transparency on the selling behavior of profitable stocks is greater than its effect on the selling behavior of losing stocks. Overall, an increase in corporate transparency significantly reduces the disposition effect.

2026-05-08T07:01:40Z Front. Psychol. 16:1626829 Siliu Chen Fei Ren 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1626829