https://arxiv.org/api/GTdb98p6NaBwwnrnh8y+uRTRDpw2026-06-21T22:33:10Z302221015http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07006v1Smart Contract Adoption in Derivative Markets under Bounded Risk: An Optimization Approach2025-10-08T13:28:55ZThis study develops and analyzes an optimization model of smart contract adoption under bounded risk, linking structural theory with simulation and real-world validation. We examine how adoption intensity alpha is structurally pinned at a boundary solution, invariant to variance and heterogeneity, while profitability and service outcomes are variance-fragile, eroding under volatility and heavy-tailed demand. A sharp threshold in the fixed cost parameter A3 triggers discontinuous adoption collapse (H1), variance shocks reduce profits monotonically but not adoption (H2), and additional results on readiness heterogeneity (H3), profit-service co-benefits (H4), and distributional robustness (H5) confirm the duality between stable adoption and fragile payoffs. External validity checks further establish convergence of sample average approximation at the canonical O(1/sqrt(N)) rate (H6). Empirical validation using S&P 500 returns and the MovieLens100K dataset corroborates the theoretical structure: bounded and heavy-tailed distributions fit better than Gaussian models, and profits diverge across volatility regimes even as adoption remains stable. Taken together, the results demonstrate that adoption choices are robust to uncertainty, but their financial consequences are highly fragile. For operations and finance, this duality underscores the need for risk-adjusted performance evaluation, option-theoretic modeling, and distributional stress testing in strategic investment and supply chain design.2025-10-08T13:28:55Z44 pages, 10 figures. Planned submission to Omega: The International Journal of Management Science (ABDC A, Elsevier), December 2025 (planned)Jinho ChaLong PhamThi Le Hoa VoJaeyoung ChoJaejin Leehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06379v1Modeling ROI in Chronic Disease Management, A Simulation-Based Framework Integrating Patient Adherence and Policy Timing2025-10-07T18:57:18ZBackground: Chronic diseases impose a sustained burden on healthcare systems through progressive deterioration and long-term costs. Although adherence-enhancing interventions are widely promoted, their return on investment (ROI) remains uncertain, particularly under heterogeneous patient behavior and socioeconomic variation. Methods: We developed a simulation-based framework integrating disease progression, time-varying adherence, and policy timing. Cumulative healthcare costs were modeled over a 10-year horizon using continuous-time stochastic formulations calibrated with Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data stratified by income. ROI was estimated across adherence gains (delta) and policy costs (gamma). Results: Early and adaptive interventions yielded the highest ROI by sustaining adherence and slowing progression. ROI exceeded 20 percent when delta >= 0.20 and gamma <= 1.5, whereas low-impact or high-cost policies failed to break even. Subgroup analyses showed a 32 percent ROI gap between the lowest and highest income strata, with projected savings of 312 USD per patient versus baseline. Sensitivity tests confirmed robustness under stochastic adherence and inflation variability. Conclusions: The framework provides a transparent and adaptable tool for evaluating cost-effective adherence strategies. By linking behavioral effectiveness with fiscal feasibility, it supports the design of robust and equitable chronic disease policies. Reported ROI values represent conservative lower bounds, and extensions incorporating DALYs and QALYs illustrate scalability toward full health outcome integration.2025-10-07T18:57:18Z24 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables, Supplementary Material available. Submitted to BMC Public HealthJinho ChaEunchan D. ChaEmily YooHyoshin Songhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01814v1Mean-field theory of the Santa Fe model revisited: a systematic derivation from an exact BBGKY hierarchy for the zero-intelligence limit-order book model2025-10-02T09:00:43ZThe Santa Fe model is an established econophysics model for describing stochastic dynamics of the limit order book from the viewpoint of the zero-intelligence approach. While its foundation was studied by combining a dimensional analysis and a mean-field theory by E. Smith et al. in Quantitative Finance 2003, their arguments are rather heuristic and lack solid mathematical foundation; indeed, their mean-field equations were derived with heuristic arguments and their solutions were not explicitly obtained. In this work, we revisit the mean-field theory of the Santa Fe model from the viewpoint of kinetic theory -- a traditional mathematical program in statistical physics. We study the exact master equation for the Santa Fe model and systematically derive the Bogoliubov-Born-Green-Kirkwood-Yvon (BBGKY) hierarchical equation. By applying the mean-field approximation, we derive the mean-field equation for the order-book density profile, parallel to the Boltzmann equation in conventional statistical physics. Furthermore, we obtain explicit and closed expression of the mean-field solutions. Our solutions have several implications: (1)Our scaling formulas are available for both $μ\to 0$ and $μ\to \infty$ asymptotics, where $μ$ is the market-order submission intensity. Particularly, the mean-field theory works very well for small $μ$, while its validity is partially limited for large $μ$. (2)The ``method of image'' solution, heuristically derived by Bouchaud-Mézard-Potters in Quantitative Finance 2002, is obtained for large $μ$, serving as a mathematical foundation for their heuristic arguments. (3)Finally, we point out an error in E. Smith et al. 2003 in the scaling law for the diffusion constant due to a misspecification in their dimensional analysis.2025-10-02T09:00:43Z40 pages, 10 figuresTaiki WakatsukiKiyoshi Kanazawahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01451v1Financial Stability Implications of Generative AI: Taming the Animal Spirits2025-10-01T20:46:02ZThis paper investigates the impact of the adoption of generative AI on financial stability. We conduct laboratory-style experiments using large language models to replicate classic studies on herd behavior in trading decisions. Our results show that AI agents make more rational decisions than humans, relying predominantly on private information over market trends. Increased reliance on AI-powered trading advice could therefore potentially lead to fewer asset price bubbles arising from animal spirits that trade by following the herd. However, exploring variations in the experimental settings reveals that AI agents can be induced to herd optimally when explicitly guided to make profit-maximizing decisions. While optimal herding improves market discipline, this behavior still carries potential implications for financial stability. In other experimental variations, we show that AI agents are not purely algorithmic, but have inherited some elements of human conditioning and bias.2025-10-01T20:46:02ZAnne Lundgaard HansenSeung Jung Lee10.17016/FEDS.2025.090http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18764v2An Analytical Approach to (Meta)Relational Models Theory, and its Application to Triple Bottom Line (Profit, People, Planet) -- Towards Social Relations Portfolio Management2025-09-28T09:06:35ZInvestigating the optimal nature of social interactions among actors (e.g., people or firms), who seek to achieve certain mutually-agreed objectives, has been the subject of extensive academic research. Using the relational models theory (describing all social interactions as combinations of four basic sociality ingredients: Communal Sharing, Authority Ranking, Equality Matching, and Market Pricing), the common approach revolves around qualitative arguments for determining sociality configurations most effective in realizing specific purposes, at times supplemented by empirical data. In the current treatment, we formulate this question as a mathematical optimization problem, in order to quantitatively derive the most suitable combination of sociality forms for dyadic actors, which optimizes their mutually-agreed objective. For this purpose, we develop an analytical framework of the (meta)relational models theory, and demonstrate that combining the four sociality forms to define a specific meaningful social situation inevitably prompts an inherent tension among them, codified by a single elementary and universal metarelation. In analogy with financial portfolio management, we subsequently introduce the concept of Social Relations Portfolio (SRP) management, and propose a generalizable methodology capable of quantitatively identifying the efficient SRP, which, in turn, enables effective stakeholder and change management initiatives. As an important illustration, the methodology is applied to the Triple Bottom Line (Profit, People, Planet) paradigm to derive its efficient SRP. This serves as a guide to practitioners for precisely measuring, monitoring, reporting and steering stakeholder and change management efforts concerning Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) within and / or across organizations.2024-02-29T00:12:55ZVer. 2: feedback from community experts incorporated, along with refinements in the text and updated acknowledgement. 41 pages, 8 pdf figures and tablesArsham FarzinniaCorine Boonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22600v1Impact IRR: Leveraging Modern Portfolio Theory to Define Impact Investments2025-09-26T17:18:23ZThe impact investment market has an estimated value of almost $1.6 trillion. Significant progress has been made in determining the financial returns of impact investing. Investors are still, however, in the early stages of determining impact return. In this study, the author proposes the use of impact internal rate of return (impact IRR) to evaluate and monitor impact investments. This approach, which utilizes components of modern portfolio theory, adapted financial tools, and existing datasets, is demonstrated herein through initial use cases and examples showing how it can be employed to optimize impact.2025-09-26T17:18:23ZDaniel Soliman10.3905/jesg.2025.1.131http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21244v1Multivariate Quadratic Hawkes Processes -- Part II: Non-Parametric Empirical Calibration2025-09-25T14:38:01ZThis is the second part of our work on Multivariate Quadratic Hawkes (MQHawkes) Processes, devoted to the calibration of the model defined and studied analytically in Aubrun, C., Benzaquen, M., & Bouchaud, J. P., Quantitative Finance, 23(5), 741-758 (2023). We propose a non-parametric calibration method based on the general method of moments applied to a coarse-grained version of the MQHawkes model. This allows us to bypass challenges inherent to tick by tick data. Our main methodological innovation is a multi-step calibration procedure, first focusing on ''self'' feedback kernels, and then progressively including cross-effects. Indeed, while cross-effects are significant and interpretable, they are usually one order of magnitude smaller than self-effects, and must therefore be disentangled from noise with care. For numerical stability, we also restrict to pair interactions and only calibrate bi-variate QHawkes, neglecting higher-order interactions. Our main findings are: (a) While cross-Hawkes feedback effects have been empirically studied previously, cross-Zumbach effects are clearly identified here for the first time. The effect of recent trends of the E-Mini futures contract onto the volatility of other futures contracts is especially strong; (b) We have identified a new type of feedback that couples past realized covariance between two assets and future volatility of these two assets, with the pair E-Mini vs TBOND as a case in point; (c) A cross-leverage effect, whereby the sign of the return of one asset impacts the volatility of another asset, is also clearly identified. The cross-leverage effect between the E-Mini and the residual volatility of single stocks is notable, and surprisingly universal across the universe of stocks that we considered.2025-09-25T14:38:01ZCecilia AubrunMichael BenzaquenJean-Philippe Bouchaudhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00978v2Decentralised Multi-Manager Fund Framework2025-09-24T15:07:08ZWe introduce a decentralised, algorithmic framework for permissionless, multi-strategy capital allocation via tokenised, automated vaults. The system is designed to function analogously to a multi-strategy asset management company, but implemented entirely on-chain through a modular architecture comprising four interacting layers. The first, the capitalisation layer, composed of vaults that facilitate multi-asset deposits, tokenises investor participation, and specifies high level risk limits and admissible venues for deployment. The second, the strategy layer, enables the submission of strategies by human developers or autonomous agents, creating a decentralised marketplace governed by a validation mechanism incorporating adversarial and gamified elements. The third, the execution layer, operationalises strategy deployment using the host blockchain network's services. The fourth layer, the validated allocation layer, assesses and allocates capital among validated strategies, dynamically rebalancing toward those exhibiting superior risk-adjusted performance. In the framework, each admitted strategy acts as a manager for the "fund", encapsulated in a smart contract vault that issues transferable V-Tokens, conveying fractional ownership of the real-time portfolio operated by the vault. The system is designed to be open to participation by both human and AI agents, who collectively perform the roles of capital allocators, strategy developers, and validated allocators. The resulting structure is a self-regulating asset management ecosystem capable of decentralised, cooperative optimisation across traditional and digital financial domains. This framework is facilitated by a host chain network, which offers native automation and data oracle services enabling vault entities to autonomously operate on-chain, paving the way for being self sufficient in dynamic allocation of capital.2025-07-01T17:29:12ZArman AbgaryanUtkarsh SharmaJoshua Tobkinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22706v3Graph Signal Processing for Global Stock Market Realized Volatility Forecasting2025-09-17T04:15:46ZThis paper introduces an innovative realized volatility (RV) forecasting framework that extends the conventional Heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) model via integrating Graph Signal Processing (GSP). The study first evaluates various constructions of volatility-interrelationship networks by analyzing how the associated graph signal energy tracks global financial market volatility. Volatility spillovers are subsequently embedded into the proposed framework, which employs the graph Fourier transform (GFT) and its inverse to effectively capture global stock market dynamics in both the spectral and spatial domains. The framework not only provides a global context for modeling the volatility interrelationships, but also captures the nonlinearity and directionality of the volatility spillover effect. The empirical study using RV data of $24$ global stock market indices compares short-, mid- and long-term RV forecasts with various HAR-type benchmarks and a graph neural network-based HAR model. The proposed model consistently outperforms all comparators, demonstrating the effectiveness of integrating GSP into the HAR model for RV forecasting.2024-10-30T05:34:46ZZhengyang ChiJunbin GaoChao Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15320v3Global Stock Market Volatility Forecasting Incorporating Dynamic Graphs and All Trading Days2025-09-16T12:26:48ZThis paper introduces a global stock market volatility forecasting model that enhances forecasting accuracy and practical utility in real-world financial decision-making by integrating dynamic graph structures and encompassing all active trading days of different stock markets. The model employs a spatial-temporal graph neural network architecture to capture the volatility spillover effect, where shocks in one market spread to others through the interconnective global economy. By calculating the volatility spillover index to depict the volatility network as graphs, the model effectively mirrors the volatility dynamics for the chosen stock market indices. In the empirical analysis covering 8 global market indices, the realized volatility forecasting performance of the proposed model surpasses the baseline models in all forecasting scenarios.2024-09-06T04:41:27ZZhengyang ChiJunbin GaoChao Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02065v3Leveraging Large Language Models to Democratize Access to Costly Datasets for Academic Research2025-09-14T19:24:35ZUnequal access to costly datasets essential for empirical research has long hindered researchers from disadvantaged institutions, limiting their ability to contribute to their fields and advance their careers. Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to democratize data access by automating data collection from unstructured sources. We develop and evaluate a novel methodology using GPT-4o-mini within a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework to collect data from corporate disclosures. Our approach achieves human-level accuracy in collecting CEO pay ratios from approximately 10,000 proxy statements and Critical Audit Matters (CAMs) from more than 12,000 10-K filings, with LLM processing times of 9 and 40 minutes respectively, each at a cost under US $10. This stands in stark contrast to the hundreds of hours needed for manual collection or the thousands of dollars required for commercial database subscriptions. To foster a more inclusive research community by empowering researchers with limited resources to explore new avenues of inquiry, we share our methodology and the resulting datasets.2024-12-03T00:59:56Z58 pagegs, 5 figures, 5 tablesJulian Junyan WangVictor Xiaoqi Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13818v3Joint Liability Model with Adaptation to Climate Change2025-09-14T18:22:28ZThis paper extends the application of ESG score assessment methodologies from large corporations to individual farmers' production, within the context of climate change. Our proposal involves the integration of crucial agricultural sustainability variables into conventional personal credit evaluation frameworks, culminating in the formulation of a holistic sustainable credit rating referred to as the Environmental, Social, Economics (ESE) score. This ESE score is integrated into theoretical joint liability models, to gain valuable insights into optimal group sizes and individual-ESE score relationships. Additionally, we adopt a mean-variance utility function for farmers to effectively capture the risk associated with anticipated profits. Through a set of simulation exercises, the paper investigates the implications of incorporating ESE scores into credit evaluation systems, offering a nuanced comprehension of the repercussions under various climatic conditions.2024-04-22T01:40:37ZJiayue ZhangKen Seng TanTony S. WirjantoLysa Porthhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10810v1Attribution Locus and the Timeliness of Long-lived Asset Write-downs2025-09-13T06:58:23ZWe examine the relative timeliness with which write-downs of long-lived assets incorporate adverse macroeconomic and industry outcomes versus adverse firm-specific outcomes. We posit that users of financial reports are more likely to attribute adverse firm-specific outcomes to suboptimal managerial actions, which provide managers with more incentive to delay write downs. We provide evidence that, controlling for other incentives to manage earnings, firms record write-downs in the current year that are driven by adverse macroeconomic and industry outcomes during both the current year and the next year, but they record write-downs driven by adverse firm-specific outcomes only in the current year.2025-09-13T06:58:23ZYao-Lin ChangChun-Yang LinChi-Chun LiuStephen G. Ryanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16974v4Assessing Consistency and Reproducibility in the Outputs of Large Language Models: Evidence Across Diverse Finance and Accounting Tasks2025-09-13T01:57:49ZThis study provides the first comprehensive assessment of consistency and reproducibility in Large Language Model (LLM) outputs in finance and accounting research. We evaluate how consistently LLMs produce outputs given identical inputs through extensive experimentation with 50 independent runs across five common tasks: classification, sentiment analysis, summarization, text generation, and prediction. Using three OpenAI models (GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4o-mini, and GPT-4o), we generate over 3.4 million outputs from diverse financial source texts and data, covering MD&As, FOMC statements, finance news articles, earnings call transcripts, and financial statements. Our findings reveal substantial but task-dependent consistency, with binary classification and sentiment analysis achieving near-perfect reproducibility, while complex tasks show greater variability. More advanced models do not consistently demonstrate better consistency and reproducibility, with task-specific patterns emerging. LLMs significantly outperform expert human annotators in consistency and maintain high agreement even where human experts significantly disagree. We further find that simple aggregation strategies across 3-5 runs dramatically improve consistency. We also find that aggregation may come with an additional benefit of improved accuracy for sentiment analysis when using newer models. Simulation analysis reveals that despite measurable inconsistency in LLM outputs, downstream statistical inferences remain remarkably robust. These findings address concerns about what we term "G-hacking," the selective reporting of favorable outcomes from multiple generative AI runs, by demonstrating that such risks are relatively low for finance and accounting tasks.2025-03-21T09:43:37Z76 pages, 20 tables, 12 figuresJulian Junyan WangVictor Xiaoqi Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09095v1Digital Transformation and Corporate Financial Asset Allocation: Evidence from China2025-09-11T02:02:12ZAgainst the backdrop of rapid technological advancement and the deepening digital economy, this study examines the causal impact of digital transformation on corporate financial asset allocation in China. Using data from A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2022, we construct a firm-level digitalization index based on text analysis of annual reports and differentiate financial asset allocation into long-term and short-term dimensions. Employing fixed-effects models and a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) design, we find that digital transformation significantly promotes corporate financial asset allocation, with a more pronounced effect on short-term than long-term allocations. Mechanism analyses reveal that digitalization operates through dual channels: broadening investment avenues and enhancing information processing capabilities. Specifically, it enables firms to allocate long-term high-yield financial instruments, thereby optimizing the maturity structure of assets, while also improving information efficiency, curbing inefficient investments, and reallocating capital toward more productive financial assets. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that firms in non-eastern regions, state-owned enterprises, and larger firms are more responsive in short-term allocation, whereas eastern regions, non-state-owned enterprises, and small and medium-sized enterprises benefit more in long-term allocation. Our findings provide micro-level evidence and mechanistic insights into how digital transformation reshapes corporate financial decision-making, offering important implications for both policymakers and firms.2025-09-11T02:02:12Z37pages,5 figuresYundan GuoHan LiangLi Shen