https://arxiv.org/api/ugo1Jk6TymxwvaVq0zgNOsGjhBo2026-04-07T08:32:05Z296016515http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12007v1Mapping Microscopic and Systemic Risks in TradFi and DeFi: a literature review2025-08-16T10:33:40ZThis work explores the formation and propagation of systemic risks across traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi), offering a comparative framework that bridges these two increasingly interconnected ecosystems. We propose a conceptual model for systemic risk formation in TradFi, grounded in well-established mechanisms such as leverage cycles, liquidity crises, and interconnected institutional exposures. Extending this analysis to DeFi, we identify unique structural and technological characteristics - such as composability, smart contract vulnerabilities, and algorithm-driven mechanisms - that shape the emergence and transmission of risks within decentralized systems. Through a conceptual mapping, we highlight risks with similar foundations (e.g., trading vulnerabilities, liquidity shocks), while emphasizing how these risks manifest and propagate differently due to the contrasting architectures of TradFi and DeFi. Furthermore, we introduce the concept of crosstagion, a bidirectional process where instability in DeFi can spill over into TradFi, and vice versa. We illustrate how disruptions such as liquidity crises, regulatory actions, or political developments can cascade across these systems, leveraging their growing interdependence. By analyzing this mutual dynamics, we highlight the importance of understanding systemic risks not only within TradFi and DeFi individually, but also at their intersection. Our findings contribute to the evolving discourse on risk management in a hybrid financial ecosystem, offering insights for policymakers, regulators, and financial stakeholders navigating this complex landscape.2025-08-16T10:33:40Z61 pages, 3 figuresSabrina AufieroSilvia BartolucciFabio CaccioliPierpaolo Vivohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09935v1Language of Persuasion and Misrepresentation in Business Communication: A Textual Detection Approach2025-08-13T16:38:31ZBusiness communication digitisation has reorganised the process of persuasive discourse, which
allows not only greater transparency but also advanced deception. This inquiry synthesises classical
rhetoric and communication psychology with linguistic theory and empirical studies in the financial
reporting, sustainability discourse, and digital marketing to explain how deceptive language can be
systematically detected using persuasive lexicon. In controlled settings, detection accuracies of greater
than 99% were achieved by using computational textual analysis as well as personalised transformer
models. However, reproducing this performance in multilingual settings is also problematic and,
to a large extent, this is because it is not easy to find sufficient data, and because few multilingual
text-processing infrastructures are in place. This evidence shows that there has been an increasing
gap between the theoretical representations of communication and those empirically approximated,
and therefore, there is a need to have strong automatic text-identification systems where AI-based
discourse is becoming more realistic in communicating with humans.2025-08-13T16:38:31Z21Sayem HossenMonalisa Moon JotiMd. Golam Rashedhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09513v1The Market Effects of Algorithms2025-08-13T05:51:59ZWhile there is excitement about the potential for algorithms to optimize individual decision-making, changes in individual behavior will, almost inevitably, impact markets. Yet little is known about such effects. In this paper, I study how the availability of algorithmic prediction changes entry, allocation, and prices in the US single-family housing market, a key driver of household wealth. I identify a market-level natural experiment that generates variation in the cost of using algorithms to value houses: digitization, the transition from physical to digital housing records. I show that digitization leads to entry by investors using algorithms, but does not push out investors using human judgment. Instead, human investors shift toward houses that are difficult to predict algorithmically. Algorithmic investors predominantly purchase minority-owned homes, a segment of the market where humans may be biased. Digitization increases the average sale price of minority-owned homes by 5% and reduces racial disparities in home prices by 45%. Algorithmic investors, via competition, affect the prices paid by owner-occupiers and human investors for minority homes; such changes drive the majority of the reduction in racial disparities. The decrease in racial inequality underscores the potential for algorithms to mitigate human biases at the market level.2025-08-13T05:51:59ZLindsey Raymondhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08148v1Unwitting Markowitz' Simplification of Portfolio Random Returns2025-08-11T16:24:37ZIn his famous paper, Markowitz (1952) derived the dependence of portfolio random returns on the random returns of its securities. This result allowed Markowitz to obtain his famous expression for portfolio variance. We show that Markowitz's equation for portfolio random returns and the expression for portfolio variance, which results from it, describe a simplified approximation of the real markets when the volumes of all consecutive trades with the securities are assumed to be constant during the averaging interval. To show this, we consider the investor who doesn't trade shares of securities of his portfolio. The investor only observes the trades made in the market with his securities and derives the time series that model the trades with his portfolio as with a single security. These time series describe the portfolio return and variance in exactly the same way as the time series of trades with securities describe their returns and variances. The portfolio time series reveal the dependence of portfolio random returns on the random returns of securities and on the ratio of the random volumes of trades with the securities to the random volumes of trades with the portfolio. If we assume that all volumes of the consecutive trades with securities are constant, obtain Markowitz's equation for the portfolio's random returns. The market-based variance of the portfolio accounts for the effects of random fluctuations of the volumes of the consecutive trades. The use of Markowitz variance may give significantly higher or lower estimates than market-based portfolio variance.2025-08-11T16:24:37Z10 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2507.21824Victor Olkhovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20100v1A Solow-Swan framework for economic growth with memory effect2025-08-11T16:20:50ZThe Solow-Swan equation is a cornerstone in the development of modern economic growth theory and continues to attract significant scholarly attention. This study incorporates memory effects into the classical Solow-Swan model by introducing a formulation based on the Caputo fractional derivative. A comparative analysis is conducted between the integer-order and fractional-order versions of the model to examine the influence of fractional dynamics on capital accumulation. The findings reveal that the inclusion of a fractional-order derivative significantly affects the trajectory and long-term stability of capital, offering a more flexible and comprehensive framework for modeling economic growth processes.2025-08-11T16:20:50Z12 pagesAfrika Matematika 2025, 36:143M. O. AibinuK. J. DuffyS. Moyo10.1007/s13370-025-01365-yhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07082v1The Interaction Between Domestic Monetary Policy and Macroprudential Policy in Israel2025-08-09T19:27:57ZThe global financial crisis (GFC) triggered the use of macroprudential policies imposed on the banking sector. Using bank-level panel data for Israel for the period 2004-2019, we find that domestic macroprudential measures changed the composition of bank credit growth but did not affect the total credit growth rate. Specifically, we show that macroprudential measures targeted at the housing sector moderated housing credit growth but tended to increase business credit growth. We also find that accommodative monetary policy surprises tended to increase bank credit growth before the GFC. We show that accommodative monetary policy surprises increased consumer credit when interacting with macroprudential policies targeting the housing market. Accommodative monetary policy interacted with nonhousing macroprudential measures to increase total credit.2025-08-09T19:27:57ZEconomic Modelling, 112, 2022, 105872Jonathan BenchimolInon GamrasniMichael KahnSigal RibonYossi SaadonNoam Ben-Ze'evAsaf SegalYitzchak Shizgal10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105872http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11651v1Tokenize Everything, But Can You Sell It? RWA Liquidity Challenges and the Road Ahead2025-08-03T10:30:15ZThe tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs) promises to transform financial markets by enabling fractional ownership, global accessibility, and programmable settlement of traditionally illiquid assets such as real estate, private credit, and government bonds. While technical progress has been rapid, with over \$25 billion in tokenized RWAs brought on-chain as of 2025, liquidity remains a critical bottleneck. This paper investigates the gap between tokenization and tradability, drawing on recent academic research and market data from platforms such as RWA.xyz. We document that most RWA tokens exhibit low trading volumes, long holding periods, and limited investor participation, despite their potential for 24/7 global markets. Through case studies of tokenized real estate, private credit, and tokenized treasury funds, we present empirical liquidity observations that reveal low transfer activity, limited active address counts, and minimal secondary trading for most tokenized asset classes. Next, we categorize the structural barriers to liquidity, including regulatory gating, custodial concentration, whitelisting, valuation opacity, and lack of decentralized trading venues. Finally, we propose actionable pathways to improve liquidity, ranging from hybrid market structures and collateral-based liquidity to transparency enhancements and compliance innovation. Our findings contribute to the growing discourse on digital asset market microstructure and highlight that realizing the liquidity potential of RWAs requires coordinated progress across legal, technical, and institutional domains.2025-08-03T10:30:15ZRischan Mafrurhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07497v2Forecasting stock return distributions around the globe with quantile neural networks2025-08-02T17:50:28ZWe propose a novel machine learning approach for forecasting the distribution of stock returns using a rich set of firm-level and market predictors. Our method combines a two-stage quantile neural network with spline interpolation to construct smooth, flexible cumulative distribution functions without relying on restrictive parametric assumptions. This allows accurate modelling of non-Gaussian features such as fat tails and asymmetries. Furthermore, we show how to derive other statistics from the forecasted return distribution such as mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis. The derived mean and variance forecasts offer significantly improved out-of-sample performance compared to standard models. We demonstrate the robustness of the method in US and international markets.2024-08-14T12:26:16ZJozef BarunikMartin HronecOndrej Tobekhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11649v1From fair price to fair volatility: Towards an Efficiency-Consistent Definition of Financial Risk2025-08-02T15:47:46ZVolatility, as a primary indicator of financial risk, forms the foundation of classical frameworks such as Markowitz's Portfolio Theory and the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). However, its conventional use rests on assumptions-most notably, the Markovian nature of price dynamics-that often fail to reflect key empirical characteristics of financial markets. Fractional stochastic volatility models expose these limitations by demonstrating that volatility alone is insufficient to capture the full structure of return dispersion. In this context, we propose pointwise regularity, measured via the Hurst-Holder exponent, as a complementary metric of financial risk. This measure quantifies local deviations from martingale behavior, enabling a more nuanced assessment of market inefficiencies and the mechanisms by which equilibrium is restored. By accounting not only for the magnitude but also for the nature of randomness, this framework bridges the conceptual divide between efficient market theory and behavioral finance.2025-08-02T15:47:46Z31 pages, 6 figuresSergio BianchiDaniele AngeliniMassimiliano FrezzaAugusto Pianesehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07987v1Automated Trading System for Straddle-Option Based on Deep Q-Learning2025-08-01T16:20:19ZStraddle Option is a financial trading tool that explores volatility premiums in high-volatility markets without predicting price direction. Although deep reinforcement learning has emerged as a powerful approach to trading automation in financial markets, existing work mostly focused on predicting price trends and making trading decisions by combining multi-dimensional datasets like blogs and videos, which led to high computational costs and unstable performance in high-volatility markets. To tackle this challenge, we develop automated straddle option trading based on reinforcement learning and attention mechanisms to handle unpredictability in high-volatility markets. Firstly, we leverage the attention mechanisms in Transformer-DDQN through both self-attention with time series data and channel attention with multi-cycle information. Secondly, a novel reward function considering excess earnings is designed to focus on long-term profits and neglect short-term losses over a stop line. Thirdly, we identify the resistance levels to provide reference information when great uncertainty in price movements occurs with intensified battle between the buyers and sellers. Through extensive experiments on the Chinese stock, Brent crude oil, and Bitcoin markets, our attention-based Transformer-DDQN model exhibits the lowest maximum drawdown across all markets, and outperforms other models by 92.5\% in terms of the average return excluding the crude oil market due to relatively low fluctuation.2025-08-01T16:20:19ZYiran WanXinyu YingShengzhen Xuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21824v1Markowitz Variance May Vastly Undervalue or Overestimate Portfolio Variance and Risks2025-07-29T14:00:26ZWe consider the investor who doesn't trade shares of his portfolio. The investor only observes the current trades made in the market with his securities to estimate the current return, variance, and risks of his unchanged portfolio. We show how the time series of consecutive trades made in the market with the securities of the portfolio can determine the time series that model the trades with the portfolio as with a single security. That establishes the equal description of the market-based variance of the securities and of the portfolio composed of these securities that account for the fluctuations of the volumes of the consecutive trades. We show that Markowitz's (1952) variance describes only the approximation when all volumes of the consecutive trades with securities are assumed constant. The market-based variance depends on the coefficient of variation of fluctuations of volumes of trades. To emphasize this dependence and to estimate possible deviation from Markowitz variance, we derive the Taylor series of the market-based variance up to the 2nd term by the coefficient of variation, taking Markowitz variance as a zero approximation. We consider three limiting cases with low and high fluctuations of the portfolio returns, and with a zero covariance of trade values and volumes and show that the impact of the coefficient of variation of trade volume fluctuations can cause Markowitz's assessment to highly undervalue or overestimate the market-based variance of the portfolio. Incorrect assessments of the variances of securities and of the portfolio cause wrong risk estimates, disturb optimal portfolio selection, and result in unexpected losses. The major investors, portfolio managers, and developers of macroeconomic models like BlackRock, JP Morgan, and the U.S. Fed should use market-based variance to adjust their predictions to the randomness of market trades.2025-07-29T14:00:26Z20 pagesVictor Olkhovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14173v4Decentralized Finance (Literacy) today and in 2034: Initial Insights from Singapore and beyond2025-07-28T09:17:43ZHow will Decentralized Finance transform financial services? Using New Institutional Economics and Dynamic Capabilities Theory, I analyse survey data from 109 experts using non-parametric methods. Experts span traditional finance, DeFi industry, and academia. Four insights emerge: adoption expectations rise from negligible to 43% expecting at least high adoption by 2034; experts expect convergence scenarios over disruption, with traditional finance embracing DeFi most likely; back-office transforms before customer-facing functions; strategic competencies eclipse DeFi-sector specific- and technical skills. This challenges technology-centric adoption models. DeFi represents emerging market entry requiring organizational transformation, not just technological implementation. SEC developments validate predictions. Financial institutions should prioritize developing strategic capabilities over mere technical training.2024-10-18T04:50:54Zworking paperDaniel Liebauhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20494v1Deep Reputation Scoring in DeFi: zScore-Based Wallet Ranking from Liquidity and Trading Signals2025-07-28T03:12:27ZAs decentralized finance (DeFi) evolves, distinguishing between user behaviors - liquidity provision versus active trading - has become vital for risk modeling and on-chain reputation. We propose a behavioral scoring framework for Uniswap that assigns two complementary scores: a Liquidity Provision Score that assesses strategic liquidity contributions, and a Swap Behavior Score that reflects trading intent, volatility exposure, and discipline. The scores are constructed using rule-based blueprints that decompose behavior into volume, frequency, holding time, and withdrawal patterns. To handle edge cases and learn feature interactions, we introduce a deep residual neural network with densely connected skip blocks inspired by the U-Net architecture. We also incorporate pool-level context such as total value locked (TVL), fee tiers, and pool size, allowing the system to differentiate similar user behaviors across pools with varying characteristics. Our framework enables context-aware and scalable DeFi user scoring, supporting improved risk assessment and incentive design. Experiments on Uniswap v3 data show its usefulness for user segmentation and protocol-aligned reputation systems. Although we refer to our metric as zScore, it is independently developed and methodologically different from the cross-protocol system proposed by Udupi et al. Our focus is on role-specific behavioral modeling within Uniswap using blueprint logic and supervised learning.2025-07-28T03:12:27ZComments: 10 pages, 5 figures. Independently developed system by Zeru Finance for decentralized user scoring. Not submitted to any conference or journalDhanashekar KandaswamyAshutosh SahooAkshay SPGurukiran SParag PaulGirish G Nhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06500v1Negative redispatch power for green hydrogen production: Game changer or lame duck? A German perspective2025-07-25T10:57:19ZFollowing years of controversial discussions about the risks of market-based redispatch, the German transmission network operators finally installed regional redispatch markets by the end of 2024. Since water electrolysers are eligible market participants, the otherwise downwards redispatched renewable energy can be used for green hydrogen production in compliance with European law. To show how different price levels in regional redispatch markets affect green hydrogen production cost and thus the incentive for electrolyser market participation, we use historic redispatch time series and evaluate various power purchase scenarios. Our results show that low price levels can lead to notable production cost reductions, potentially counteracting uncertainties in redispatch power availability and thus incentivising system-beneficial electrolyser siting. In contrast, the possibility of high price levels can nullify an increase in the competitiveness of German and European green hydrogen through production cost reductions and discourage market participation.2025-07-25T10:57:19ZJonathan BrandtAstrid BensmannRichard Hanke-Rauschenbachhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22932v1FinMarBa: A Market-Informed Dataset for Financial Sentiment Classification2025-07-24T16:27:32ZThis paper presents a novel hierarchical framework for portfolio optimization, integrating lightweight Large Language Models (LLMs) with Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to combine sentiment signals from financial news with traditional market indicators. Our three-tier architecture employs base RL agents to process hybrid data, meta-agents to aggregate their decisions, and a super-agent to merge decisions based on market data and sentiment analysis. Evaluated on data from 2018 to 2024, after training on 2000-2017, the framework achieves a 26% annualized return and a Sharpe ratio of 1.2, outperforming equal-weighted and S&P 500 benchmarks. Key contributions include scalable cross-modal integration, a hierarchical RL structure for enhanced stability, and open-source reproducibility.2025-07-24T16:27:32Z8 pagesBaptiste LefortEric BenhamouBeatrice GuezJean-Jacques OhanaEthan SetroukAlban Etienne