https://arxiv.org/api/Njh4N3AK404yGSZ+fCm0Y8N7cEY2026-06-13T10:58:44Z3019015http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11238v2Artificial Intelligence in Ship Finance: Applications, Opportunities, and a Case Study in AI-Augmented Loan Origination2026-06-11T14:52:48ZShip finance is a data-intensive and document-heavy segment of asset-based lending, requiring the integration of financial, technical, contractual, and regulatory information from heterogeneous and largely unstructured sources. Increasing environmental regulation and ESG reporting requirements are adding further complexity to underwriting and loan-origination processes. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), create new opportunities for processing and analysing such information. This paper reviews potential applications of AI in ship finance, with a particular focus on LLM-based systems for document comprehension, information extraction, and workflow automation. We present ShipFinance.ai, a modular agentic architecture to support loan application workflows in ship finance. The proposed system combines an LLM-based extraction module, financial analysis components, external maritime data services, and a controlled document-generation module with a chatbot interface to support the preparation of standardized financing applications. The paper discusses the key challenges for using such models in production. We argue that AI-assisted systems can support maritime finance professionals in managing increasingly complex information and reporting requirements.2026-05-29T12:29:33Z9 pages, 1 figureLasse DierichOrestis Schinashttp://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08874v2Hydrogen Development in China and the EU: A Recommended Tian Ji's Horse Racing Strategy2026-06-10T23:21:11ZThe global momentum towards establishing sustainable energy systems has become increasingly prominent. Hydrogen, as a remarkable carbon-free and renewable energy carrier, has been endorsed by 39 countries at COP28 in the UAE, recognizing its essential role in global energy transition and industry decarbonization. Both the European Union (EU) and China are at the forefront of this shift, developing hydrogen strategies to enhance regional energy security and racing for carbon neutrality commitments by 2050 for the EU and 2060 for China. The wide applications of hydrogen across hard-to-abate sectors and the flexibility of decentralized production and storage offer customized solutions utilizing local resources in a self-paced manner. To unveil the trajectory of hydrogen development in China and the EU, this paper proposes a comparative analysis framework employing key factors to investigate hydrogen developments in both economic powerhouses. Beyond country-wise statistics, it dives into representative hydrogen economic areas in China (Inner Mongolia, Capital Economic Circle, Yangtze River Delta) and Europe (Delta Rhine Corridor) for understanding supply and demand, industrial synergy, and policy incentives for local hydrogen industries. The derived implications offer stakeholders an evolving hydrogen landscape across the Eurasian continent and insights for future policy developments facilitating the global green transition.2024-08-01T21:51:11ZAccepted as a policy research working paper at the 42nd International Energy Workshop (IEW 2024) hosted by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) in Bonn, GermanyHong Xuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05357v3Inventory record inaccuracy in grocery retailing: Impact of promotions and product perishability, and targeted effect of audits2026-06-08T18:00:16ZWe report the results of a study to identify and quantify drivers of inventory record inaccuracy (IRI) in a grocery retailing environment, a context where products are often subject to promotion activity and a substantial share of items are perishable. The analysis covers ~24,000 stock keeping units (SKUs) sold in 11 stores. We find that IRI is positively associated with average inventory level, restocking frequency, and whether the item is perishable, and negatively associated with promotional activity. We also conduct a field quasi-experiment to assess the marginal effect of stockcounts on sales. While performing an inventory audit is found to lead to an 11% store-wide sales lift, the audit has heterogeneous effects with all the sales lift concentrated on items exhibiting negative IRI (i.e., where system inventory is greater than actual inventory). The benefits of inventory audits are also found to be more pronounced on perishable items, that are associated with higher IRI levels. Our findings inform retailers on the appropriate allocation of effort to improve IRI and reframes stock counting as a sales-increasing strategy rather than a cost-intensive necessity.2025-05-22T12:25:01ZYacine RekikRogelio OlivaChristoph GlockAris Syntetoshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08141v1A Structural Matrix Autoregressive Model for the Joint Dynamics of Volume, Volatility, and Returns2026-06-06T12:37:53ZThis paper proposes a Structural Matrix Autoregressive (SMAR) model for the joint analysis of asset returns, realized volatility, and trading volume in a large-dimensional setting. This framework simultaneously captures dynamic spillovers across financial variables and cross-sectional dependence across assets while preserving a parsimonious parameterization relative to conventional vector autoregressive models. The model is estimated on daily data for the constituents of the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the period 2021-2025 and is structurally identified through restrictions consistent with the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis and efficient market theory. The empirical findings indicate that volatility is the primary driver of trading activity, suggesting that informational shocks are predominantly incorporated into markets through price variability. Forecast error variance decompositions further reveal that, although internal shocks dominate short-term volume dynamics, cross-asset spillovers account for more than 50% of trading volume variation at longer horizons. Finally, an event-study analysis around FOMC announcements supports the proposed decomposition by identifying significant increases in the informative component of trading activity on announcement days followed by rapid mean reversion.2026-06-06T12:37:53ZAndrea BucciGiulio PalombaEduardo Rossihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26076v3The Financialization of Proof-of-Stake: Asymptotic Centralization under Exogenous Risk Premiums2026-06-04T22:13:21ZThis paper introduces a heterogeneous macroeconomic model of a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) network to analyze the long-term centralizing effects of external traditional finance (TradFi) yields. We model a continuum of rational actors divided into two distinct classes: investors, who optimize portfolios between staking and external variance-dominated investments, and consumers, who balance staking yields against the transactional utility of holding liquid assets. By employing a quasi-linear utility function to model consumer behavior, we derive a cubic polynomial that strictly defines the unique macroeconomic equilibrium of the coupled network. The model demonstrates that, at scale, external macroeconomic factors force the complete institutional capture of the PoS consensus layer. Because investors have access to external risk premiums, their wealth compounds exponentially, leading to massive capital inflows that crush the protocol's internal staking yield to effectively zero. We show that as the yield is crushed, consumer wealth becomes strictly upper-bounded. Ultimately, consumers are forced to cease staking entirely and hold all remaining wealth in liquid form to satisfy their transactional constraints.2026-04-28T19:40:04Z13 pages, 1 figureMikhail Perepelitsahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05991v1Forecasting of volatility and risk premia in electricity markets2026-06-04T10:38:46ZWe study forecasting of the realized covariation in electricity markets. The realized covariation in this context is a matrix-valued representation of the latent infinite-dimensional covariance operator and a parsimonious matrix-HAR type model is constructed to facilitate estimation. We test the model on one-week ahead forecasts of the weekly realized covariation and find that the inclusion of longer time horizons and renewable generation information adds important predictive power. We also investigate the prediction of risk premia in electricity forward markets and find that our variance forecasts provide substantially improved forecasts of spread risk premia compared to standard methods relying on backward looking volatility.2026-06-04T10:38:46ZThomas K. KlosterFred Espen Benthhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12010v3FDI versus R\&D in an endogenous growth model2026-06-04T10:33:12ZWe investigate the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) and research and development (R\&D) in the transitional dynamics of host countries using an optimal growth model. FDI may benefit the host country's GNP by enabling multinational enterprises to hire local workers. However, if the host country focuses solely on FDI, it may fall into a middle-income trap. Most importantly, we show that if the host country invests in R\&D, its economy can reach sustained growth. In this case, FDI benefits the host country, but only in the early stages of its development process.2025-01-21T10:02:53ZThanh Tam Nguyen-HuuEM NormandieNgoc-Sang PhamEM Normandiehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14852v2Recovering State Prices from Options2026-06-02T20:15:01ZExtracting the joint risk-neutral distribution from option prices has remained an open problem since Ross (1976). We propose a projection-based estimator that approximates target payoffs over the entire state space using portfolios of observed options. The method estimates correlations and joint crash probabilities even when markets are incomplete, improves univariate estimates relative to Carr and Madan (2001(, and yields an explicit finite-sample bound interpretable as a measure of market incompleteness. Applying the method to two unexpected Swiss National Bank announcements about the EUR/CHF floor, we find that dependence, rather than marginal volatility, accounts for about two-thirds of the change in joint crash risk. A policy targeting one exchange rate reshaped the broader CHF currency market.2026-01-21T10:37:02ZTjeerd De Vrieshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03767v1Trading Frictions in Dynamic Cap-and-Trade Markets2026-06-02T15:21:49ZWe develop a dynamic stochastic model of markets with an externality and multiple trading frictions, and cap-and-trade as the leading application. Slow participation, limited intermediation, and heterogeneous information interact in equilibrium: agents choose costly market access, access determines residual compliance demand, intermediary constraints translate residual demand into a surrender-month premium, and the premium feeds back into access incentives. These interactions shape how effectively the market corrects the externality. We characterize access choices in closed form, prove that the equilibrium premium is unique, and show that endogenous access dampens the response to each friction in isolation, while the interaction of multiple frictions is non-additive and can amplify the price response. We quantify the model using 2.7 million EU ETS registry transactions and compliance records from 2005-2021. About 40% of operators do not trade annually, purchases concentrate in April when returns are systematically high, and operator flow predicts future returns.2026-06-02T15:21:49ZNicola BorriYukun LiuAleh TsyvinskiXi Wuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03153v1Mind the Gap in the Mining Game2026-06-02T05:02:06ZWe analyze intentional block delays (mining gaps) in Proof-of-Work blockchain systems, where miners strategically balance mining rewards against operational costs. Using a game-theoretic model, we derive a Nash equilibrium with optimal mining strategies and establish necessary and sufficient conditions for mining gap existence. We demonstrate that mining gaps, when combined with difficulty adjustment algorithms, can destabilize the system. We propose conditions to address sustainability concerns as block rewards decrease and reliance on transaction fees increases. Our findings are illustrated through a two-player game simulation and an analysis of the Bitcoin network, providing insights for blockchain design and policy. This work contributes to understanding strategic mining behavior and its impact on blockchain stability and efficiency.2026-06-02T05:02:06ZQuantitative Finance 26(2), 213-233 (2025)Kyoung-Kuk KimDonghwa Seo10.1080/14697688.2025.2583378http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02528v1Auditing Asset-Specific Preferences in Financial Large Language Models: Evidence from Bitcoin Representations and Portfolio Allocation2026-06-01T17:36:06ZLarge language models now power robo-advisors and trading agents, yet whether they carry built-in biases toward specific assets is largely untested. We ask three questions: do LLMs systematically prefer certain financial instruments; can an internal representation with causal leverage over those preferences be identified; and does that representation affect downstream financial decisions?
We develop a three-level audit protocol and apply it to Bitcoin. First, a behavioral audit of eight frontier LLMs shows that Bitcoin's ranking among money-like instruments is frame-dependent: models place it around rank 5 of 8 as "reliable money" but near the top under crisis and autonomous-agent frames, and an attribute-swap experiment confirms rankings track functional properties, not names. Second, we open a model's internals: a search across thousands of sparse-autoencoder features in Gemma 3 identifies a dominant Bitcoin-selective feature. Amplifying it shifts the model toward the asset and suppressing it shifts the model away, even when "Bitcoin" never appears in the prompt. Third, we test financial consequences: amplification raises Bitcoin's portfolio share by 5.2 percentage points while suppression lowers it by 4.6 pp, with amplification reallocating within crypto and suppression cutting total crypto exposure.
We characterize this as bounded behavioral leverage (leverage meaning causal influence over outputs, not financial leverage): an identifiable internal feature can be perturbed to move financial choices, but only within measurable limits. The framework links internal representations to external recommendations, validated with random controls and mechanism boundaries. As LLMs become autonomous financial agents, this is a first step toward a behavioral layer for emerging know-your-agent (KYA) standards: knowing what an agent prefers, and how far that preference can be moved.2026-06-01T17:36:06Z28 pages, 5 figures, 18 tablesWenbin Wuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07526v3Strategic Preemption Under Shared Catastrophic Risk: The Suicide Region and the Race to Artificial General Intelligence2026-05-29T20:49:04ZWe analyze a continuous-time preemption game with shared catastrophic externalities. When the cost of catastrophe is embedded in both players' payoffs, the risk term cancels out in the equilibrium indifference condition. This creates a "suicide region" where competitive pressures force rational agents to deploy despite negative risk-adjusted net present values. We apply this framework to the race for artificial general intelligence (AGI). We show that this suicide region widens as the cost of systemic ruin grows: higher catastrophic risk does not deter the race but instead enlarges the set of conditions under which rational actors deploy despite negative social value. We characterize the resulting welfare distortion against a social planner's benchmark and demonstrate how two complementary mechanisms - private liability and prize-sharing - can close the suicide region. Private liability raises the cost of unsafe deployment while prize-sharing reduces the strategic imperative to deploy first. "Warning shots" (sub-existential disasters) will fail to deter AGI acceleration, as the winner-takes-all nature of the race remains intact.2025-12-08T13:00:23Z41 pages, 1 figureDavid Tanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30672v1Residual Supply and the Price of Risk Absorption2026-05-29T00:05:09ZWhen redeeming open-end funds sell and natural buyers do not step in at once, some limited-capital investor must take the other side and carry the inventory until prices recover. This paper asks what return that investor requires. A continuous-time market-clearing model delivers an expected-return restriction in which the price of residual supply depends on inventory risk, trading costs, funding frictions, and the scarcity of balance sheet available to absorb it. Mapping U.S. mutual fund flows through predetermined holdings over 2003--2024, we measure one observable component of this residual supply. Forced-sale pressure predicts actual fund selling, contemporaneous price declines, and positive returns over the following one to six months. The premium roughly doubles when market-wide absorption capacity is tight, and it concentrates in stocks with thin investor bases and limited trading capacity -- precisely the cross section in which clearing the imbalance should be most costly, and a pattern that mechanical return reversal does not generate.2026-05-29T00:05:09ZZiyao Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29376v1Three-Currency HJM for Brazilian Credit Markets2026-05-28T05:23:22ZThis paper develops a three-currency Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework in which corporate credit is treated as a separate economy, connected to the nominal and real economies through synthetic inflation and credit exchange rates. The framework produces a testable identity. Under joint no-arbitrage, the credit spread of an issuer expressed over the inflation-rateindexed risk-free curve equals the same issuer's credit spread expressed over the nominalrate-indexed risk-free curve plus the model-implied breakeven inflation forward at the same maturity. The identity holds within any single calibration of the framework. It is empirically falsifiable across two parallel corporate-bond segments of the same market, in a segmented market the two segments may price different corporate credit economies, and the gap between their implied corporate forwards measures the failure of the shared-credit-economy assumption. Applied to Brazilian debenture markets, the framework delivers a sharp empirical finding. Fifteen large issuers placed paper in both the CDI-indexed general-purpose segment and the IPCA-indexed infrastructure segment between January 2021 and February 2026. The within-issuer triangle residual at the 3-year tenor averages 640 basis points, with crosssectional standard deviation of 26 basis points across the 15 issuer means, and remains stable through both the 2021-2023 BCB tightening cycle and the 2024-2026 easing phase. A retail post-tax indifference benchmark anchored on Lei 12.431 closes the bulk of the residual. The remainder is consistent with institutional participation on the CDI side, contractual asymmetries between debentures with different use-of-proceeds restrictions, and segment-specific liquidity gaps.2026-05-28T05:23:22ZRaphael Coelhohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26074v1StakeBench: Evaluating Language Understanding Grounded in Market Commitment2026-05-25T17:38:30ZExisting financial NLP benchmarks often rely on labels supplied by outside observers, measuring how language is perceived rather than what speakers have committed to in the market. We introduce StakeBench, an evaluation framework for language understanding grounded in market commitment. StakeBench links 560,876 comments from 2,261 resolved markets to verified position, action, and market-odds records across Polymarket and Manifold. Supervision is derived from observable market behavior. Position sides, post-comment trading actions, and market-odds trajectories replace human annotation. Four diagnostic tasks test whether models detect market commitment, identify the revealed side, anticipate future action, and perform collective odds projection. Three commitment-aware metrics measure alignment with revealed preferences rather than perceived sentiment. Validity audits and explicit interpretation boundaries help distinguish observable commitment signals from latent belief and causal market-odds impact. Across 15 LLMs and 18 topics and platform settings, models partially recover position-side signals, with Directed Accuracy from 0.506 to 0.599, but show structural failures on later tasks. Ten of the fifteen models collapse to one or two action labels in future action anticipation, and no model consistently improves on the naive odds-direction baseline in collective odds projection. Model scale is not correlated with performance, finance-domain tuning does not improve revealed-side identification, and platform incentives strongly shape higher-order results. StakeBench is packaged with evaluation code and dataset under CC-BY 4.0.2026-05-25T17:38:30Z21 pages, 2 figures, 20 tables. Preprint. Dataset and evaluation code includedYunhua PeiJingyu HuYiwei ShiHongnan MaWeiru LiuJohn Cartlidge