https://arxiv.org/api/DkmmJN9SCEUH6D7D/9IU3qxdEkI2026-03-16T08:19:41Z31171515http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05862v1Impact of arbitrage between leveraged ETF and futures on market liquidity during market crash2026-03-06T03:36:48ZLeveraged ETFs (L-ETFs) are exchange-traded funds that achieve price movements several times greater than an index by holding index-linked futures such as Nikkei Stock Average Index futures. It is known that when the price of an L-ETF falls, the L-ETF uses the liquidity of futures to limit the decline through arbitrage trading. Conversely, when the price of a futures contract falls, the futures contract uses the liquidity of the L-ETF to limit its decline. However, the impact of arbitrage trading on the liquidity of these markets has been little studied. Therefore, the present study used artificial market simulations to investigate how the liquidity (Volume, SellDepth, BuyDepth, Tightness) of both markets changes when prices plummet in either (i.e., the L-ETF or futures market), depending on the presence or absence of arbitrage trading. As a result, it was found that when erroneous orders occur in the L-ETF market, the existence of arbitrage trading causes liquidity to be supplied from the futures market to the L-ETF market in terms of SellDepth and Tightness. When erroneous orders occur in the futures market, the existence of arbitrage trading causes liquidity to be supplied from the L-ETF market to the futures market in terms of SellDepth and Tightness, and liquidity to be supplied from the futures market to the L-ETF market in terms of Volume. We also analyzed the internal market mechanisms that led to these results.2026-03-06T03:36:48ZThe IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Vol.109-D, No.1, pp.22-31, 2026Ryuki HayaseTakanobu MizutaIsao Yagi10.14923/transinfj.2025SGP0003http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06424v2Single- and Multi-Level Fourier-RQMC Methods for Multivariate Shortfall Risk2026-03-05T21:16:22ZMultivariate shortfall risk measures provide a principled framework for quantifying systemic risk and determining capital allocations prior to aggregation in interconnected financial systems. Despite their well established theoretical properties, the numerical estimation of multivariate shortfall risk and the corresponding optimal allocations remains computationally challenging, as existing Monte Carlo based approaches can be numerically expensive due to slow convergence.
In this work, we develop a new class of single and multilevel numerical algorithms for estimating multivariate shortfall risk and the associated optimal allocations, based on a combination of Fourier inversion techniques and randomized quasi Monte Carlo (RQMC) sampling. Rather than operating in physical space, our approach evaluates the relevant expectations appearing in the risk constraint and its optimization in the frequency domain, where the integrands exhibit enhanced smoothness properties that are well suited for RQMC integration. We establish a rigorous mathematical framework for the resulting Fourier RQMC estimators, including convergence analysis and computational complexity bounds. Beyond the single level method, we introduce a multilevel RQMC scheme that exploits the geometric convergence of the underlying deterministic optimization algorithm to reduce computational cost while preserving accuracy.
Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed Fourier RQMC methods outperform sample average approximation and stochastic optimization benchmarks in terms of accuracy and computational cost across a range of models for the risk factors and loss structures. Consistent with the theoretical analysis, these results demonstrate improved asymptotic convergence and complexity rates relative to the benchmark methods, with additional savings achieved through the proposed multilevel RQMC construction.2026-02-06T06:43:47ZChiheb Ben HammoudaTruong Ngoc Nguyenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03671v1Is an investor stolen their profits by mimic investors? Investigated by an agent-based model2026-03-04T02:56:29ZSome investors say increasing investors with the same strategy decreasing their profits per an investor. On the other hand, some investors using technical analysis used to use same strategy and parameters with other investors, and say that it is better. Those argues are conflicted each other because one argues using with same strategy decreases profits but another argues it increase profits. However, those arguments have not been investigated yet. In this study, the agent-based artificial financial market model(ABAFMM) was built by adding "additional agents"(AAs) that includes additional fundamental agents (AFAs) and additional technical agents (ATAs) to the prior model. The AFAs(ATAs) trade obeying simple fundamental(technical) strategy having only the one parameter. We investigated earnings of AAs when AAs increased. We found that in the case with increasing AFAs, market prices are made stable that leads to decrease their profits. In the case with increasing ATAs, market prices are made unstable that leads to gain their profits more.2026-03-04T02:56:29ZTakanobu MizutaIsao Yagihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02620v1Same Error, Different Function: The Optimizer as an Implicit Prior in Financial Time Series2026-03-03T05:47:19ZNeural networks applied to financial time series operate in a regime of underspecification, where model predictors achieve indistinguishable out-of-sample error. Using large-scale volatility forecasting for S$\&$P 500 stocks, we show that different model-training-pipeline pairs with identical test loss learn qualitatively different functions. Across architectures, predictive accuracy remains unchanged, yet optimizer choice reshapes non-linear response profiles and temporal dependence differently. These divergences have material consequences for decisions: volatility-ranked portfolios trace a near-vertical Sharpe-turnover frontier, with nearly $3\times$ turnover dispersion at comparable Sharpe ratios. We conclude that in underspecified settings, optimization acts as a consequential source of inductive bias, thus model evaluation should extend beyond scalar loss to encompass functional and decision-level implications.2026-03-03T05:47:19Z39 pages, 24 figuresFederico Vittorio CortesiGiuseppe IannoneGiulia CrippaTomaso PoggioPierfrancesco Beneventanohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08616v2Reasoning on Time-Series for Financial Technical Analysis2026-03-02T08:07:02ZWhile Large Language Models have been used to produce interpretable stock forecasts, they mainly focus on analyzing textual reports but not historical price data, also known as Technical Analysis. This task is challenging as it switches between domains: the stock price inputs and outputs lie in the time-series domain, while the reasoning step should be in natural language. In this work, we introduce Verbal Technical Analysis (VTA), a novel framework that combine verbal and latent reasoning to produce stock time-series forecasts that are both accurate and interpretable. To reason over time-series, we convert stock price data into textual annotations and optimize the reasoning trace using an inverse Mean Squared Error (MSE) reward objective. To produce time-series outputs from textual reasoning, we condition the outputs of a time-series backbone model on the reasoning-based attributes. Experiments on stock datasets across U.S., Chinese, and European markets show that VTA achieves state-of-the-art forecasting accuracy, while the reasoning traces also perform well on evaluation by industry experts.2025-11-06T15:21:57ZICLR 2026Kelvin J. L. KoaJan ChenYunshan MaHuanhuan ZhengTat-Seng Chuahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11209v3SANOS Smooth strictly Arbitrage-free Non-parametric Option Surfaces2026-02-28T08:44:17ZWe present a simple, numerically efficient but highly flexible non-parametric method to construct representations of option price surfaces which are both smooth and strictly arbitrage-free across time and strike. The method can be viewed as a smooth generalization of the widely-known linear interpolation scheme, and retains the simplicity and transparency of that baseline. Calibration of the model to observed market quotes is formulated as a linear program, allowing bid-ask spreads to be incorporated directly via linear penalties or inequalities, and delivering materially lower computational cost than most of the currently available implied-volatility surface fitting routines. As a further contribution, we derive an equivalent parameterization of the proposed surface in terms of strictly positive "discrete local volatility" variables. This yields, to our knowledge, the first construction of smooth, strictly arbitrage-free option price surfaces while requiring only trivial parameter constraints (positivity). We illustrate the approach using S&P 500 index options2026-01-16T11:33:39Z23 pagesHans BuehlerBlanka HorvathAnastasis KratsiosYannick LimmerRaeid Saqurhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23784v1TradeFM: A Generative Foundation Model for Trade-flow and Market Microstructure2026-02-27T08:26:53ZFoundation models have transformed domains from language to genomics by learning general-purpose representations from large-scale, heterogeneous data. We introduce TradeFM, a 524M-parameter generative Transformer that brings this paradigm to market microstructure, learning directly from billions of trade events across >9K equities. To enable cross-asset generalization, we develop scale-invariant features and a universal tokenization scheme that map the heterogeneous, multi-modal event stream of order flow into a unified discrete sequence -- eliminating asset-specific calibration. Integrated with a deterministic market simulator, TradeFM-generated rollouts reproduce key stylized facts of financial returns, including heavy tails, volatility clustering, and absence of return autocorrelation. Quantitatively, TradeFM achieves 2-3x lower distributional error than Compound Hawkes baselines and generalizes zero-shot to geographically out-of-distribution APAC markets with moderate perplexity degradation. Together, these results suggest that scale-invariant trade representations capture transferable structure in market microstructure, opening a path toward synthetic data generation, stress testing, and learning-based trading agents.2026-02-27T08:26:53Z29 pages, 17 figures, 6 tables. PreprintMaxime Kawawa-BeaudanSrijan SoodKassiani PapasotiriouDaniel BorrajoManuela Velosohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14788v3Polynomial Scaling is Possible For Neural Operator Approximations of Structured Families of BSDEs2026-02-27T02:52:30ZNeural operator (NO) architectures learn nonlinear maps between infinite-dimensional function spaces and are widely used to accelerate simulation and enable data-driven model discovery. While universality results ensure expressivity, they do not address \emph{complexity}: for broad operator classes described only through regularity (e.g.\ uniform continuity or $C^r$-regularity), information-theoretic lower bounds imply that minimax-optimal NO approximation rates scale \emph{exponentially} in the reciprocal accuracy $1/\varepsilon$. This has shifted the focus of NO theory toward identifying additional problem-specific structure, beyond regularity, under which suitably tailored NO architectures can leverage to unlock polynomial scaling in $1/\varepsilon$.
We exhibit the first polynomial-scaling regime for NO approximations of solution operators in stochastic analysis; by identifying structured families of \emph{non-Markovian} BSDEs with randomized terminal condition parameterized by the Sobolev-regular terminal condition and by Sobolev-regular additive nonlinear perturbations of the generator. We prove that their solution operator can be approximated (uniformly over the family) by a tailored NO whose number of trainable parameters grows \emph{polynomially} in $1/\varepsilon$. We unlock this polynomial scaling regime by \emph{informing the NO's inductive bias} by factoring out the singular part of the associated semilinear elliptic PDE Green's function and by incorporating the Doléans--Dade exponential of the BSDE's common non-Markovian factor into the NO's decoding layers. As a byproduct, we extend polynomial-scaling guarantees from families of linear elliptic PDEs on regular domains to the semilinear setting.2024-10-18T18:01:40Z47 pages + referencesTakashi FuruyaAnastasis Kratsioshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03175v3Breaking the Dimensional Barrier: Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Parameter Uncertainty via Pontryagin Projection2026-02-26T14:32:04ZWe study continuous-time CRRA portfolio choice in diffusion markets with estimated and hence uncertain coefficients. Nature draws a latent parameter $θ\sim q$ at time $0$ and keeps it fixed; the investor never observes $θ$ and must commit to a single $θ$-blind policy maximizing an ex-ante objective, treating $q$ as a decision-time input. We propose a simulation-only two-stage solver.Stage 1 (DPO) performs BPTT-based stochastic gradient ascent through an Euler simulator while sampling $θ$ only inside the simulator. Stage 2 (Pontryagin projection) aggregates costate blocks across $θ\sim q$ and enforces the $q$-aggregated stationarity condition within the deployable class; the resulting correction can be amortized via interactive distillation. We refer to the full Stage 1 + Stage 2 pipeline as PG-DPO.We prove a uniform conditional BPTT-PMP correspondence and a residual-based policy-gap bound with explicit discretization and Monte Carlo error terms. Experiments on high-dimensional Gaussian drift-uncertainty and factor-driven benchmarks show that projection stabilizes learning and accurately recovers analytic decision-time references, while a model-free PPO baseline remains far from the targets.2026-01-06T16:52:35ZJeonggyu HuhHyeng Keun Koohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.25017v2Convergence of the generalization error for deep gradient flow methods for PDEs2026-02-25T17:53:00ZThe aim of this article is to provide a firm mathematical foundation for the application of deep gradient flow methods (DGFMs) for the solution of (high-dimensional) partial differential equations (PDEs). We decompose the generalization error of DGFMs into an approximation and a training error. We first show that the solution of PDEs that satisfy reasonable and verifiable assumptions can be approximated by neural networks, thus the approximation error tends to zero as the number of neurons tends to infinity. Then, we derive the gradient flow that the training process follows in the ``wide network limit'' and analyze the limit of this flow as the training time tends to infinity. These results combined show that the generalization error of DGFMs tends to zero as the number of neurons and the training time tend to infinity.2025-12-31T18:11:51Z29 pagesChenguang LiuAntonis PapapantoleonJasper Rouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05716v2When the Rules Change: Adaptive Signal Extraction via Kalman Filtering and Markov-Switching Regimes2026-02-25T10:36:08ZMost empirical microstructure research assumes that order flow--return parameters are constant, yet these relationships shift substantially across market regimes. Combining adaptive Kalman filtering, Markov-switching regime identification, and asymmetric response estimation, we characterize regime-dependent investor behavior in the Korean stock market during 2020--2024 using daily transaction data disaggregated by investor type. Three principal findings emerge: foreign investor predictive power increases several-fold during crisis periods relative to bull markets; individual investors chase momentum asymmetrically, reacting far more strongly to positive than to negative shocks; and independent information-theoretic validation corroborates both patterns. Rigorous out-of-sample testing reveals that these in-sample regularities do not generalize reliably, underscoring the need for proper validation methodology in microstructure research.2026-01-09T11:00:57ZSungwoo Kanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20856v1Stochastic Discount Factors with Cross-Asset Spillovers2026-02-24T12:58:01ZThis paper develops a unified framework that links firm-level predictive signals, cross-asset spillovers, and the stochastic discount factor (SDF). Signals and spillovers are jointly estimated by maximizing the Sharpe ratio, yielding an interpretable SDF that both ranks characteristic relevance and uncovers the direction of predictive influence across assets. Out-of-sample, the SDF consistently outperforms self-predictive and expected-return benchmarks across investment universes and market states. The inferred information network highlights large, low-turnover firms as net transmitters. The framework offers a clear, economically grounded view of the informational architecture underlying cross-sectional return dynamics.2026-02-24T12:58:01ZDoron AvramovXin Hehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20015v2Roughness Analysis of Realized Volatility and VIX through Randomized Kolmogorov-Smirnov Distribution2026-02-24T11:52:53ZWe introduce a novel distribution-based estimator for the Hurst parameter of log-volatility, leveraging the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic to assess the scaling behavior of entire distributions rather than individual moments. To address the temporal dependence of financial volatility, we propose a random permutation procedure that effectively removes serial correlation while preserving marginal distributions, enabling the rigorous application of the KS framework to dependent data. We establish the asymptotic variance of the estimator, useful for inference and confidence interval construction. From a computational standpoint, we show that derivative-free optimization methods, particularly Brent's method and the Nelder-Mead simplex, achieve substantial efficiency gains relative to grid search while maintaining estimation accuracy. Empirical analysis of the CBOE VIX index and the 5-minute realized volatility of the S&P 500 reveals a statistically significant hierarchy of roughness, with implied volatility smoother than realized volatility. Both measures, however, exhibit Hurst exponents well below one-half, reinforcing the rough volatility paradigm and highlighting the open challenge of disentangling local roughness from long-memory effects in fractional modeling.2025-09-24T11:32:58ZThe authors are withdrawing this manuscript in order to prepare a substantially revised and expanded version, including major structural changes and additional results that go beyond a standard replacementSergio BianchiDaniele Angelinihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22888v2SABR-Informed Multitask Gaussian Process: A Synthetic-to-Real Framework for Implied Volatility Surface Construction2026-02-24T04:55:34ZThis study introduces a SABR-informed multitask Gaussian process for constructing implied volatility surfaces from sparse option quotes. We treat a dense synthetic dataset generated by a calibrated SABR model as the source task and market option quotes as the target task. Within the multitask Gaussian process framework, we learn cross-task dependence via task embeddings with hierarchical regularization, enabling adaptive transfer of structural information. On Heston ground truth across ten market regimes and in a case study with SPX options, the model achieves lower error than the single-task Gaussian process and SABR at near-term maturities and remains competitive at long-term maturities, while satisfying standard no-arbitrage conditions. The framework combines the theory-driven structure with nonparametric Bayesian regression and yields reliable implied volatility surfaces for risk management.2025-06-28T13:57:17Z34 pagesJournal of Computational Science, Volume 95, 2026Jirong ZhuangXuan Wu10.1016/j.jocs.2026.102818http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20415v1Markets are competitive if and only if P != NP2026-02-23T23:31:43ZI prove that competitive market outcomes require computational intractability. If P = NP, firms can efficiently solve the collusion detection problem, identifying deviations from cooperative agreements in complex, noisy markets and thereby making collusion sustainable as an equilibrium. If P != NP, the collusion detection problem is computationally infeasible for markets satisfying a natural instance-hardness condition on their demand structure, rendering punishment threats non-credible and collusion unstable. Combined with Maymin (2011), who proved that market efficiency requires P = NP, this yields a fundamental impossibility: markets can be informationally efficient or competitive, but not both. Artificial intelligence, by expanding firms' computational capabilities, is pushing markets from the competitive regime toward the collusive regime, explaining the empirical emergence of algorithmic collusion without explicit coordination.2026-02-23T23:31:43Z31 pages, 1 figurePhilip Z. Maymin