https://arxiv.org/api/UARsZUZ2NvzSr+5P96ZLbi0F7v82026-06-13T10:56:24Z3229015http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01921v3Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network Models in Asset Pricing: An Empirical Study on Large-Cap US Stocks2026-06-11T16:47:43ZIn this study, MLP models with dynamic structure are applied to factor models for asset pricing tasks. Concretely, the MLP pyramid model structure was employed on firm characteristic-sorted portfolio factors for modelling the large-cap US stocks. It was further developed as a practical factor investing strategy based on the predictions. The main findings were evaluated from 2 angles: model predictive power and backtesting performance, which were compared for the periods with and without COVID-19. The empirical results indicated that, given the constraints of the data size, the MLP models no longer perform 'deeper, better' in terms of predictive power, whereas the proposed MLP models with 2 and 3 hidden layers have greater flexibility in modelling the factors in this case. This study also verified the idea from previous work that MLP models for factor investing are more meaningful for downside risk control than for pursuing absolute annual returns.2025-05-03T20:55:40ZShanyan Lai10.5281/zenodo.15333718http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22792v3From Arbitrage Removal to Density Extraction: A Model-Free Framework for Short-Dated Options2026-06-11T10:19:48ZWe study risk-neutral density extraction from short-dated option chains. As expiry approaches, option premia decline and bid--ask spreads can be large relative to prices, making mid quotes particularly uninformative. Stale or asynchronous quotes may also generate potential static arbitrages, rendering standard procedures infeasible or unstable. We develop a model-free pipeline that treats bid-ask quotes as the primitive market constraint. The pipeline consists of two steps. First, a procedure called ``Arbitrage Removal Iterative Executable Strategy'' (ARIES) filters executable static arbitrage at quoted bid and ask prices under market-depth constraints. Second, the ``Smooth Entropic Density EXtraction'' (SEDEx) then recovers the density through a criterion leveraging smoothness and entropy under bid-ask constraints. We test the pipeline on synthetic Heston panels and short-dated SPX option data, sampled from a few hours to one week before expiry. Computation is fast and returns robust densities across various market conditions, including scheduled macroeconomic announcements. As an empirical application, we use the recovered densities to construct short dated implied-volatility smiles.2026-05-21T17:46:10ZAaron WizmanGabriel TuriniciGregory Merranhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12717v1In-Family Arbitrage-Free Interpolation of Mixture Densities Across Expirations2026-06-10T22:09:08ZGiven risk-neutral densities of a tradeable forward, fitted as $N$-component mixtures at a finite set of expiration pillars, we look for a continuous-time interpolation that (i) stays inside the mixture family (it remains a mixture of the same kernel, though generically with more components than either pillar), and (ii) is the marginal flow of a Markov martingale, equivalently carries a non-negative Dupire local volatility. The second requirement is the peacock (convex-order) property. For full-support kernels (Gaussian, lognormal) a peacock corresponds to a unique continuous local-volatility diffusion (Lowther). We give a constructive interpolation that stays in a fixed $2N$-component family, note as an open question whether $N$ components suffice, and describe the main practical difficulty: in strongly bimodal regimes the local volatility stays finite but becomes badly conditioned.2026-06-10T22:09:08Z7 pages, 3 figuresThijs van den Berghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19225v5FinTradeBench: A Financial Reasoning Benchmark for LLMs2026-06-10T15:37:05ZReal-world financial decision-making is a challenging problem that requires reasoning over heterogeneous signals, including company fundamentals derived from regulatory filings and trading signals computed from price dynamics. Recently, with advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), financial analysts have begun to use them for financial decision-making tasks. However, existing financial question-answering benchmarks for testing these models primarily focus on company balance sheet data and rarely evaluate reasoning about how company stocks trade in the market or their interactions with fundamentals. To leverage the strengths of both approaches, we introduce FinTradeBench, a benchmark for evaluating financial reasoning that integrates company fundamentals and trading signals. FinTradeBench contains 1,400 questions grounded in NASDAQ-100 companies over a ten-year historical window. The benchmark is organized into three reasoning categories: fundamentals-focused, trading-signal-focused, and hybrid questions requiring cross-signal reasoning. To ensure reliability at scale, we adopt a calibration-then-scaling framework that combines expert seed questions, multi-model response generation, intra-model self-filtering, numerical auditing, and human-LLM judge alignment.
We evaluate 14 LLMs under zero-shot prompting and retrieval-augmented settings and witness a clear performance gap. Retrieval substantially improves reasoning over textual fundamentals, but provides limited benefit for trading-signal reasoning. These findings highlight fundamental challenges in the numerical and time-series reasoning for current LLMs and motivate future research in financial intelligence.2026-03-19T17:59:41Z9 pages main text, 31 pages total (including references and appendix). 5 figures, 16 tables. Preprint under review. Code and data will be made available upon publicationYogesh AgrawalAniruddha DuttaMd Mahadi HasanSantu KarmakerAritra Duttahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11798v1Deterministic Policy Gradient for Learning Equilibrium in Time-Inconsistent Control Problems2026-06-10T08:31:54ZIn this paper, we develop a continuous-time model-free reinforcement learning algorithm to learn deterministic equilibrium policies in general time-inconsistent control problems. Utilizing the extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman system, we recast the original time-inconsistent problem into an equivalent two-stage problem. In the first stage, for given auxiliary functions, we employ the deterministic policy gradient approach to learn an optimal policy in an auxiliary time-consistent control problem. In the second stage, given the updated policy, we exploit the inner fixed point iterations and some martingale characterizations to learn the auxiliary functions. As a theoretical contribution, we provide some mild model assumptions and establish the convergence of inner fixed point iterations. By repeating this actor-critic style of iterations across two stages, our algorithm aims to learn the equilibrium under different sources of time-inconsistency in a unified manner. The superior effectiveness of the proposed algorithm are illustrated in two classical financial applications with time-inconsistency: mean-variance portfolio management and optimal tracking portfolio under non-exponential discounting.2026-06-10T08:31:54ZKeywords: Time-inconsistent control, two-stage reformulation, model-free continuous-time reinforcement learning, deterministic policy gradient, fixed point iterationXin GuoYijie HuangXiang Yuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18343v3Explicit Rational Formulae for Bachelier (Normal) Implied Volatility2026-06-09T21:41:06ZWe present two explicit rational formulae for Bachelier, or normal, implied volatility. The formulae take the option price, forward, strike, and expiry as inputs and return the implied normal volatility without iteration. They follow the branch structure of LFK-4, but use the simpler near-the-money variable given by the absolute forward-strike difference divided by the tail time value, avoiding a logarithm and a small-argument Taylor branch in that region. LFK-2026 is the accuracy-oriented formula and approximates reciprocal absolute standardized moneyness directly in the far tail. LFK-2026C keeps the same shifted out-of-the-money rational tail approximation, but splits the near-the-money branch two low degree rationals. In double precision tests both remain close to machine accuracy, while LFK-2026C is the faster scalar implementation on the current benchmark mix.2026-05-18T12:56:35ZFabien Le Floc'hhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10658v1Post-Quantum Secure Federated DeFi for Inclusive Banking2026-06-09T10:06:55ZRecent advances in error-corrected qubits have accelerated the timeline for practical quantum computing. It poses a threat to cryptographic primitives used to secure financial systems, government infrastructure, communication networks, and DeFi (Decentralized Finance) ecosystems. This paper introduces a post-quantum secure federated DeFi framework that enables inter-bank collaboration to improve the inclusivity of individuals underserved by local lenders due to limited financial histories. Multiple banks contribute encrypted information batches to a virtual server, where lattice-based Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) enables end-to-end homomorphic computation. The server fuses local data-driven probabilistic assessments, expert beliefs, and verifiable evidence generated by the NASA-IBM Prithvi Geospatial Foundation Model (GFM), in encrypted format. Decentralized technologies are employed to ensure tamper-proof evidence and auditable accountability for all encrypted data exchanges between institutions and the server. The framework is tested on agricultural lending decisions for rural borrowers in Virginia.2026-06-09T10:06:55ZSwati SachanDale FickettRichard BuchingerTheo Miller10.1109/cai68641.2026.11536585http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10245v1A Fast Implied Volatility Method with Expansions2026-06-08T23:24:15ZWe present a regime-split Black--Scholes implied volatility solver in which every initial seed is a fully closed-form analytical expression, derived from the asymptotic structure of the Black--Scholes price in its natural domain. At the money, series reversion of an exact Gaussian identity yields a fourth-order seed with error $\mathcal{O}(s^8)$. In the moderate out-of-the-money region, successive Gaussian CDF approximations of increasing order produce explicit initial seed formulas whose accuracy is proved numerically, with no iteration or numerical inversion at the seed stage. In the deep out-of-the-money region, a Gaussian tail cancellation identity -- the Mills ratio -- reveals the asymptotic structure of the Black--Scholes price and motivates a ratio-corrected seed that achieves near-machine-precision initialisation for large moneyness. All regime boundaries are derived analytically from CDF truncation tolerances and numerical solver theoretical error bounds, with no empirically tuned constants. A universal fourth-order Householder polisher then drives all regimes to machine precision, with mean update iterations strictly below two on both standard and granular benchmark grids -- meeting and surpassing the two-iteration target established by the highest-accuracy reference implementation in the literature (Jäckel, 2015). The resulting C implementation achieves a $1.73$--$1.85\times$ throughput gain over the state-of-the-art benchmark (Jäckel, 2015) under identical hardware and compiler conditions, with maximum absolute error $\mathcal{O}(10^{-14})$, stable across grid configurations. A Python/Numba implementation confirms portability. All source code is publicly available.2026-06-08T23:24:15ZAlper HekimogluIsmail Hakki Gokgozhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09478v1Volatility Forecasting and Return Prediction under Market Regimes: Evidence from High-Frequency Chinese Equity Data2026-06-08T13:36:57ZThis study investigates whether regime-dependent volatility forecasting and machine-learning-based return prediction can be jointly integrated to improve both statistical forecasting performance and economic strategy outcomes in equity markets. Using high-frequency CSI 300 Index data from 2005 to 2023, a sequential twostage framework is developed. In the first stage, realized volatility is modeled using regime-augmented HARQ specifications combined with Markov-switching GJR-GARCH filtering to capture long-memory dynamics, asymmetry, and structural market regimes. In the second stage, volatility forecasts, regime indicators, and return-related predictors are incorporated into an XGBoost return-prediction model estimated through a strictly walk-forward out-of-sample procedure. The empirical results demonstrate that regime-aware volatility forecasting consistently outperforms baseline HARQ models across forecast evaluation metrics and is generally supported by formal forecast comparison tests. In contrast, return predictability remains weak, state-dependent, and concentrated primarily in low-volatility regimes. Although naive predictive trading strategies generally fail after accounting for realistic transaction costs, carefully designed implementations incorporating volatility scaling, low-volatility gating, threshold calibration, and turnover controls can improve defensive economic performance. The findings suggest that the practical value of predictive systems in financial markets may depend less on generating strong unconditional return forecasts and more on transforming weak state-dependent signals into economically robust portfolio allocation rules. Overall, the study contributes by integrating econometric volatility modeling, regime classification, machine-learning return prediction, and implementation realism within a unified framework.2026-06-08T13:36:57Z41 pages, 16 figures, 21 tablesXinyue FangRobert Ślepaczukhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27210v2Fast-Vollib: A Fast Implied Volatility Library for Pythonwith PyTorch, JAX, and CUDA Fused-Kernel Backends2026-06-08T10:21:56ZWe present fast-vollib, an open-source Python library that provides high-performance European option pricing, implied volatility (IV) computation, and Greeks under the Black-76, Black-Scholes, and Black-Scholes-Merton models. The library is designed as a drop-in alternative to the de-facto-standard py_vollib and py_vollib_vectorized packages, with pluggable PyTorch and JAX execution backends, a CUDA fused-kernel Triton contribution for batched IV workloads, and a compatibility-first public API. In addition to a vectorized Halley-method IV solver, fast-vollib ships an experimental, fully-vectorized implementation of Jäckel's "Let's Be Rational" (LBR) algorithm with NumPy/Numba, torch.compile, JAX, and Triton single-pass GPU kernels for batched option chains. This note announces the library and describes its public API surface, with source, documentation, and packaging artifacts available at: GitHub (https://github.com/raeidsaqur/fast-vollib), Docs (https://raeidsaqur.github.io/fast-vollib/), PyPI (https://pypi.org/project/fast-vollib/).2026-04-29T21:29:32Z5 pages, 1 figure, 1 table. Software announcement / reference note. Code: https://github.com/raeidsaqur/fast-vollib. Install: pip install fast-vollibRaeid Saqurhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07600v4Differential Machine Learning for 0DTE Options with Stochastic Volatility and Jumps2026-06-08T05:48:13ZWe present a differential machine learning method for zero-days-to-expiry (0DTE) options under a stochastic-volatility jump-diffusion model. To handle the ultra-short-maturity regime, we express the option price in Black-Scholes form with a maturity-gated variance correction, combining supervision on prices and Greeks with a PIDE-residual penalty. Prices and Greeks are derived from a single trained pricing network, while jump-term identifiability is ensured by a jump-operator network fitted jointly in a three-stage procedure. The method improves jump-term approximation relative to one-stage baselines while maintaining comparable pricing errors. Furthermore, it reduces errors in Greeks, produces stable one-day delta hedges, and offers significant speedups over Fourier-based benchmarks. Calibration experiments demonstrate the network's efficiency as a pricer and incorporating jump-intensity price sensitivity into the learning process further improves the overall model fit. We also consider a jump rough Heston model.2026-03-08T12:10:24ZTakayuki Sakumahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08379v1TT-DAC-PS: Twin-Target Deterministic Actor-Critic with Policy Smoothing for Optimal Trade Execution2026-06-07T00:20:29ZThis study addresses the optimal execution of large stock sell programs by introducing TT-DAC-PS (Twin-Target Deterministic Actor-Critic with Policy Smoothing), a deterministic actor-critic architecture that combines twin exponential-moving-average critic targets with pessimistic min backup, TD3-style target policy smoothing noise, delayed actor updates, and conservative Q regularisation to curb overestimation. Exploration uses Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) noise with a hybrid schedule: deterministic episode-wise decay, variance-guided adjustment based on recent reward dispersion, and a Soft Actor-Critic (SAC)-style temperature that is learned and mapped to the noise scale. The environment integrates Almgren-Chriss (AC) trade impact with Limit Order Book (LOB) prices and volumes, normalised state features, per-step volume participation caps, and a utility-based reward. The trade execution algorithm is applied to LOB data for ten U.S. stocks. Performance is assessed against reinforcement-learning baseline algorithms, including Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO), Soft Actor-Critic (SAC), and Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C), as well as alternative trade execution algorithms, including Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP), Volume-Weighted Average Price (VWAP), and AC. The proposed model consistently reduces mean implementation shortfall percentage with competitive variance, outperforming classical baselines and standard reinforcement-learning benchmark models.2026-06-07T00:20:29Z21 pages, 1 figure, 3 tablesIlia ZaznovAtta BadiiJulian KunkelAlfonso Dufourhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08285v1Beyond Agent Architecture: Execution Assumptions and Reproducibility in LLM-Based Trading Systems2026-06-06T18:14:29ZLarge language models (LLMs) and agentic systems are increasingly proposed for financial trading, yet their reported performance remains difficult to compare because studies vary in data provenance, temporal split discipline, execution timing, turnover treatment, and transaction-cost modeling. This article presents a targeted topical review and reproducibility audit of execution realism in LLM-based trading research. A coded evidence matrix covering 30 trade-relevant primary studies is used to assess point-in-time controls, split transparency, held-out evaluation, cost and turnover treatment, execution semantics, universe definition, and artifact release. Across the audited sample, architecture reporting is generally clearer than the evaluation assumptions needed to judge whether a trading result is economically interpretable or reproducible. A 10-equity worked example is included only as a methodological scaffold to illustrate how explicit friction and timing choices can materially compress active-strategy results. The main conclusion is that the next useful step for LLM trading research is not only better agent design, but also clearer reporting standards for execution realism, reproducibility, and evaluation comparability.2026-06-06T18:14:29ZJunyi YaoZihao Zhenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08232v1Hour-Aware Adaptive Risk Management for Autonomous Memecoin Trading: A Multi-Layer Intelligence Framework2026-06-06T15:40:05ZThis paper measures hour-of-day effects, filter precision, fragility, and realised yield in a 15-day paper-traded deployment of an autonomous memecoin trading system on Solana decentralised exchanges. The 190-trade sample (March 29 to April 12, 2026) shows a 40.5 percent win rate, mean per-trade return of +0.62 percent, cumulative +117.7 percent (net SOL +0.039), skewness -1.21, excess kurtosis 6.61. A Mann-Whitney U test of three poorest-performing UTC hours (2, 13, 23) against the others yields U = 1,274, p = 0.22; directional but not significant at n = 190. The three hours were selected in-sample, so the comparison is exploratory, not confirmatory. A parallel counterfactual rejection-tracking system collected 4,874 forward-sample observations across 184 distinct rejection events. Of those events, 17.9 percent reached a 50 percent drawdown from reference within 24 hours; 26.0 percent of forward samples recorded the rejected token below half-reference. The filter stack avoided these realised drawdowns: evidence that the rejection criteria are net-positive against forward-market outcomes. Fragility is the principal caveat. Removing the top three trades (1.6 percent of sample) flips cumulative return unprofitable. Profitability rests on a small number of large winners and is structurally fragile. The dataset and audit script are deposited under CC-BY-4.0 (Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20043302).2026-06-06T15:40:05Z15 pages, 4 figures. Companion paper to RED-2400 (arXiv:2605.12151) and PRFS methodology (arXiv submit/7684836). SSRN abstract ID 6564803. Zenodo concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20043302Arati Uday Kamat10.5281/zenodo.20043302http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08228v1Post-Rejection Follow-up Sampling: A Methodology for Counterfactual Outcome Measurement in Algorithmic DEX Trading2026-06-06T15:32:38ZAlgorithmic trading systems on decentralised exchanges (DEXs) reject most candidate tokens they evaluate. The counterfactual outcome of rejected candidates (what would have happened had the system entered) is rarely measured. This paper introduces Post-Rejection Follow-up Sampling (PRFS). A separate tracking subsystem samples each rejected token's price and liquidity at a configurable cadence, over a horizon of up to twenty-four hours. PRFS produces the data needed to evaluate filter precision against actual market outcomes of rejected candidates, not against synthetic backtest reconstructions. The methodology, data architecture, and deposit format are described in Section III. The companion dataset contains 67,000 forward-outcome observation rows across 2,997 rejection events spanning 457 unique mints, collected over a continuous eight-day window (2026-04-10 to 2026-04-19, UTC). Approximately 55 percent of rejection events receive at least one forward observation; coverage at the mint level is complete. The principal binding constraint on downstream classification is per-event horizon density, not event-level coverage. PRFS is dataset-independent. It generalises to any algorithmic decision system in which rejections substantially outnumber executions.2026-06-06T15:32:38Z12 pages. Companion methodology paper to RED-2400 (arXiv:2605.12151). Currently under review at Ledger. SSRN abstract ID 6607301. Zenodo concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20043516Arati Uday Kamat10.5281/zenodo.20043516