https://arxiv.org/api/wmShhiCwInQPC0uIZeyjhnHkEPk2026-06-21T12:58:44Z121819015http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06290v1Early psychosis shows deviations in scaling behaviour within a critical regime2026-06-04T15:28:58ZAccumulating evidence suggests that large-scale brain activity exhibits scale-invariant dynamics consistent with operation in a near-critical regime. Such dynamics have been associated with long-range correlations, efficient information processing, and the emergence of collective organization. While altered criticality-related measures have been reported in psychiatric disorders, previous findings remain fragmented across observables and modalities, making it unclear whether different scaling measures capture a common alteration of large-scale brain dynamics. Here, we investigated scaling properties in resting-state fMRI data from individuals with early psychosis and healthy controls. We combined a phenomenological renormalization group (PRG) framework with power spectral density (PSD) and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) to characterize collective dynamics across scales. In healthy controls, resting-state activity exhibited non-trivial scaling behavior consistent with critical-like organization. Early psychosis participants showed the same overall phenomenology of scale-invariant organization, but with systematic shifts in scaling exponents across multiple observables. These findings indicate that early psychosis is not characterized by a simple loss of critical-like dynamics, but rather by a reorganization of collective dynamics within a preserved scaling regime. More broadly, our results suggest that combining coarse-graining approaches with temporal scaling analyses provides a principled framework for studying large-scale brain dynamics in psychiatric disorders.2026-06-04T15:28:58Z26 pages, 10 figuresIrem TopalPaola Moreno AncalmoGuillermo Montana ValverdePhilipp HomanWolfram Hinzenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23661v2Dynamical incompatibilities in paced finger tapping experiments2026-06-04T13:03:04ZPaced finger-tapping tasks are used to probe the error correction mechanism underlying sensorimotor synchronization. Despite their century-long history, fundamental contradictions persist in the literature. One such contradiction arises when comparing the two most common types of period perturbation: step change and phase shift. The stimulus sequence is exactly the same up to and including the (unexpected) perturbed stimulus. Why then would the timing of the next response be different between perturbation types, as observed? We show, both experimentally and theoretically, that responses to both types of perturbation are dynamically incompatible when recorded in separate experiments; that is, they cannot be described by a single underlying dynamical system due to the build-up of different temporal contexts. In contrast, when both types of perturbation are presented randomly within the same experiment, the responses become compatible and can be explained by a single mechanism. We conclude that a single underlying dynamical system can represent the response to all perturbation types, signs, and sizes, which is nevertheless calibrated by temporal context. Our results challenge the established idea of phase and period correction processes that are separately activated for different perturbation types.2025-12-29T18:14:04ZAriel D. SilvaClaudia R. GonzálezRodrigo Lajehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05870v1Cross-scale spatially-aware generative modeling of transcriptomic programs underlying neurodegenerative brain organization2026-06-04T08:45:45ZNeurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease exhibit highly organized patterns of regional brain vulnerability, yet the biological mechanisms underlying this spatial selectivity remain incompletely understood. Existing imaging-transcriptomic studies have largely relied on correlation-based analyses between gene expression and neuroimaging phenotypes, limiting their ability to model how molecular organization gives rise to neurodegeneration. Here, we introduce a cross-scale spatially-aware generative framework for modeling transcriptomic programs underlying cortical neurodegeneration. Regional transcriptomic profiles were derived from the Allen Human Brain Atlas using 910 landmark genes across 68 cortical regions. Neurodegenerative vulnerability maps were constructed from ADNI FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements by computing regional cortical thinning differences between cognitively normal controls (NC = 926) and Alzheimer's disease subjects (AD = 426). A variational generative architecture was used to learn latent biological programs linking regional gene-expression organization to cortical degeneration while incorporating graph-based spatial smoothness regularization to preserve cortical organization. The proposed framework achieved strong prediction of regional neurodegenerative vulnerability, yielding an explained variance of 0.8604 and a significant spatial correlation between predicted and observed cortical degeneration profiles (r = 0.9439, p < 0.001). The learned latent representations revealed structured transcriptomic organization associated with distributed disease susceptibility. These findings demonstrate that biologically constrained generative modeling can bridge microscale molecular organization with macroscale neurodegeneration, providing a foundation for spatially-aware generative neurobiology and computational neuroscience.2026-06-04T08:45:45Z26 pages, 5 figuresKrishnakumar Vaithianathanfor the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiativehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05252v2Competition, stability, and functionality in excitatory-inhibitory neural circuits2026-06-03T13:57:52ZEnergy-based models have become a central paradigm for understanding computation and stability in both theoretical neuroscience and machine learning. However, the energetic framework typically relies on symmetry in synaptic or weight matrices - a constraint that excludes biologically realistic systems such as excitatory-inhibitory (E-I) networks. When symmetry is relaxed, the classical notion of a global energy landscape fails, leaving the dynamics of asymmetric neural systems conceptually unanchored. In this work, we extend the energetic framework to asymmetric firing rate networks, revealing an underlying game-theoretic structure for the neural dynamics in which each neuron is an agent that seeks to minimize its own energy. In addition, we exploit rigorous stability principles from network theory to study regulation and balancing of neural activity in E-I networks. We combine the novel game-energetic interpretation and the stability results to revisit standard frameworks in theoretical neuroscience, such as the Wilson-Cowan and lateral inhibition models. These insights allow us to study cortical columns of lateral inhibition microcircuits as contrast enhancer - with the ability to selectively sharpen subtle differences in the environment through hierarchical excitation-inhibition interplay. Our results bridge energetic and game-theoretic views of neural computation, offering a pathway toward the systematic engineering of biologically grounded, dynamically stable neural architectures.2025-12-04T20:59:56ZSimone BettetiWilliam RetnarajAlexander DavydovJorge CortésFrancesco Bullohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28210v2The Illusion of Opting in AI-Mediated Consequential Decisions2026-06-03T13:35:21ZDrawing on Ullmann-Margalit's concept of opting (transformative, irrevocable, and shadowed by foreclosed alternatives), we show that current AI systems raise a profound ethical problem that existing AI ethics has not fully captured: the illusion of opting, in which persons and groups encounter the deceptive appearance of meaningful consequential choice while the agency needed to become genuinely capable of choosing is weakened. Against approaches that treat AI primarily as an optimizer of already given ends, we argue that AI systems should be evaluated by whether they protect and cultivate meta-capacity against the illusion of opting: the socially and institutionally scaffolded agentive capacity through which means and ends can be formed, contested, revised, and owned. This reframing is especially urgent for disadvantaged populations, who are least able to absorb the costs of the illusion of opting when AI-mediated pathways misdirect behavior and action. We propose three normative imperatives for AI-mediated consequential decisions: existential honesty, which acknowledges the limits of prediction; ecological rationality, which situates guidance within heterogeneous lived ecologies; and counterfactual reparation, which acknowledges and repairs foreclosed alternatives when AI-mediated decision-making pathways fail.2026-05-27T09:30:08Z11 pages, 1 figure, 2 tablesEugene Yu Jihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23546v2Neural Langevin Machine: a local asymmetric learning rule can be creative2026-06-03T13:18:15ZFixed points of recurrent neural networks can be leveraged to store and generate information. These fixed points can be captured by the Boltzmann-Gibbs measure, which leads to neural Langevin dynamics that can be used to find them for generative learning of a real dataset. We call this type of generative model a neural Langevin machine, which derives an asymmetric and firing-rate-speed adjusted learning rule requiring only local neural signals, thereby bearing biological relevance in terms of local predictive learning. An interesting out-of-equilibrium regime of the generative process is revealed, together with a memorization-to-generalization transition with increasing training data size. The neuro-inspired machine can also realize a continuous exploration of the phase space for different kinds of generative images and can denoise a corrupted image as well.2025-06-30T06:35:43Z7 pages, 5 figures, with Github link in the paper, supplemental material available upon requestZhendong YuWeizhong HuangHaiping Huanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14885v2Drift-Diffusion Matching: Embedding dynamics in latent manifolds of asymmetric neural networks2026-06-03T11:34:12ZRecurrent neural networks (RNNs) provide a theoretical framework for understanding computation in biological neural circuits, yet classical results, such as Hopfield's model of associative memory, rely on symmetric connectivity that restricts network dynamics to gradient-like flows. In contrast, biological networks support rich time-dependent behaviour facilitated by their asymmetry. Here we introduce a general framework, which we term drift-diffusion matching, for training continuous-time RNNs to represent arbitrary, nonlinear stochastic differential equations (SDEs), with given drift and diffusion coefficients, within a low-dimensional latent subspace. Allowing asymmetric connectivity, we show that RNNs can faithfully embed the drift and diffusion of a given SDE, including nonlinear and nonequilibrium dynamics such as chaotic attractors. As an application, we construct RNN realisations of stochastic systems that transiently explore various attractors through both input-driven switching and autonomous transitions driven by nonequilibrium currents, which we interpret as models of associative and sequential (episodic) memory. To elucidate how these dynamics are encoded in the network, we introduce decompositions of the RNN based on its asymmetric connectivity and its time-irreversibility. Our results extend attractor neural network theory beyond equilibrium, showing that asymmetric neural populations can implement a broad class of dynamical computations within low-dimensional manifolds, unifying ideas from associative memory, nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, and neural computation.2026-02-16T16:15:59Z25 pages, 16 figuresRamón Nartallo-KaluarachchiRenaud LambiotteAlain Gorielyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00465v2Intrinsic Brain Networks Underlying the Experience and Expression of Subclinical Anxiety2026-06-03T05:06:19ZAnxiety includes behavioural, physiological, and subjective components that do not always align, and it remains unclear whether these dimensions are supported by distinct intrinsic brain networks. Guided by the two-system framework, we tested whether resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) differentiates these components in subclinical anxiety. Forty-seven young adults spanning a range of subclinical anxiety levels completed a threat anticipation task measuring behavioral responses (reaction time) and physiological arousal (skin conductance), along with the NIH Fear-Affect self-report of anxiety severity. These measures were related to rsFC using region-of-interest analyses. Higher subclinical anxiety was associated with faster responses under temporally uncertain threat, consistent with increased vigilance, while no association was found with physiological arousal. At the neural level, three connectivity patterns emerged and remained significant after sequential family-wise error correction. Behavioural responses modulated by subclinical anxiety were linked to stronger connectivity between the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and insula. Physiological modulation was associated with connectivity between the ACC and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Subjective anxiety was associated with increased connectivity between the hippocampus and insula. Additional connections were observed but did not survive stricter correction. Overall, the findings indicate that behavioural, physiological, and subjective aspects of subclinical anxiety map onto partially dissociable but overlapping intrinsic brain networks, extending prior task-based results to resting-state connectivity and informing future work on early neural markers of anxiety.2026-05-01T07:01:05Z49 pages, 5 figures, 3 tablesShruti KingerNaviya LallMrinmoy Chakrabartyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04426v1Discrete signaling mediates chaotic regularization in recurrent neural networks2026-06-03T04:17:06ZCortical circuits operate in a regime of intrinsic chaos, where even tiny changes in input can lead to divergent neural responses. Yet, remarkably, population codes in the brain vary smoothly with sensory stimuli, forming coherent representational manifolds. How can chaotic networks sustain such stable coding? Here, we develop a theoretical framework that links the microscopic chaos of recurrent networks to the macroscopic geometry of neural representations. Combining kernel methods with dynamical mean-field theory, we show that chaotic dynamics induce local roughness (introducing sharp distortions at small scales) while preserving global smoothness across larger stimulus variations. This structural property acts as an intrinsic regularizer, enhancing generalization while maintaining expressivity. Moreover, we show how chaotic networks naturally produce power-law spectral signatures, closely matching experimental observations in cortical recordings. These results explain how chaotic spiking networks can sustain smooth, differentiable population codes and establish a theoretical framework linking network dynamics, computational structure, and recorded neural activity.2026-06-03T04:17:06ZJan BauerChristian KeupJonathan KadmonMoritz Heliashttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22598v2Efficient coding under constraint drives neural systems towards criticality and sloppiness2026-06-03T03:33:25ZIt is widely accepted that the brain operates near a critical state, characterized by neural avalanches that follow power-law distributions. However, the functional rationale for why neural systems attain criticality remains unclear. Here, we present a theoretical framework that links efficient coding to criticality in neural populations. Using a Gaussian population coding model, we demonstrate that maximizing Fisher information under resource constraints naturally leads to the emergence of soft modes and diverging correlation lengths, which are hallmarks of criticality. By introducing spatial structure, we unify two distinct perspectives of criticality: statistical criticality with diverging correlation lengths and dynamical criticality with critical slowing down as well as bifurcation. Furthermore, this framework provides a natural explanation for the sloppiness observed in neural systems. Numerical simulations confirm that optimization results in power-law response, providing a mechanistic link between efficient coding, sloppiness and the critical brain hypothesis.2026-05-21T15:14:10Z14 pages, 4 figuresHe XiaoXinyue ZhaoHaijun ZhouWeikang Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14742v1Do Large Language Models Have Emotions?2026-06-03T02:07:49ZDo LLMs have emotions? A recent paper from Anthropic reports finding internal representations of emotion concepts in Claude Sonnet 4.5, concluding that the LLM has 'functional emotions.' We evaluate this claim against what is known about how emotions actually function in biological systems. We argue that emotions serve two core functions: the context-sensitive interpretation of situations, and the reorganization of processing across multiple systems in response to those interpretations. The Anthropic findings offer partial support for the first function, though the consistent, discrete emotional representations identified in Claude sit uneasily with affective neuroscience findings that human emotion is characterized by variable rather than uniform neural signatures. On the second function, the evidence is mixed: Claude's representations modulate output without producing the dynamic reorganization of attention, decision speed, and motivational state that defines emotion in biological systems. We close by proposing what it would take for an LLM to have emotions.2026-06-03T02:07:49ZAmit GoldenbergJames J. Grosshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03976v1Formalizing the Binding Problem2026-06-02T17:56:24ZRepresentations of the world, arguably, contain information about features (e.g. something is blue, something is a circle) but also information about which features are part of the same object (e.g. the circle is blue), which we call binding information. Any system with the ability to understand scenes with multiple objects must be able to solve the binding problem: it needs to know which features belong together. However, despite work showing that Vision Transformers (ViTs) know which patches belong together, it is not known whether current deep learning models learn to exhibit binding information, i.e., for features. We may believe that there is not much binding information, after all misattributing features to wrong objects is a common failure of ViT-based architectures, especially in scenes with objects sharing features. Here we formalize the binding problem with an information-theoretic approach, and introduce a probing method to measure binding information in model representations. We perform experiments on ViTs, measuring binding from different components of the architecture, such as the image summary token [CLS] or the spatial tokens. We use datasets with different binding challenges, such as feature sharing, occlusion, and natural features, while comparing the performance of several pre-trained ViTs. Overall, our research demonstrates binding as a key ingredient to strong visual recognition and reasoning.2026-06-02T17:56:24ZAccepted to ICML 2026Lianghuan HuangYihao LiSaeed SalehiYingshan ChangAnsh SoniKonrad P. Kordinghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03700v1Who Is in Mind Matters: Attachment Representations in Early Childhood Synchronize Child-Adult Interacting Brains2026-06-02T14:21:04ZHuman attachment is distinguished by enduring internalized representations that shapes neurodevelopment and social-emotional functioning. However, as unobservable inner processes mixed with social cues and partner-specific factors, the neurocognitive mechanisms of these representations during real-time interaction remain unclear. Using a novel Remote Partner-Belief Manipulation paradigm in 40 child-mother-stranger trios, we experimentally isolated attachment representations in 3-4-year-olds by manipulating children's partner-belief during remote cooperation. The inner processes were captured from synchrony between partners' EEG, showing that children's mother-partner belief, regardless of the actual partner, significantly enhanced interbrain synchrony. This partner-belief modulation concentrated on children's P4 channel (overlaying the attachment-designated right temporoparietal junction), where synchrony strength correlated to attachment security and children's response acceleration due to mother-partner belief. These findings established attachment representations as an independent, endogenous driver of interbrain synchrony, potentially via children's heightened attention towards their attachment figure, implying the role of symbolic attachment activation when separation.2026-06-02T14:21:04Z26 Pages,7 figuresRuxin SuJiayang XuSaishuang WuHaiwa WangYamin LiZihan YangYuqi LiuJieqiong LiuShanbao TongYunting ZhangXiaoli GuoFan Jianghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04066v1SC-TauPath: A Structural Connectivity Attribution Framework for Mapping Tau Propagation Pathways in Alzheimer's Disease2026-06-02T13:57:13ZUnderstanding how structural connections are associated with tau propagation in Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a central open question, yet existing computational models either rely heavily on biophysical assumptions or lack neurobiologically interpretable pathway maps. We present SC-TauPath, a structural connectivity (SC) attribution framework that maps tau propagation pathways from in vivo neuroimaging data. SC-TauPath combines a Network Diffusion Model (NDM)-augmented multilayer perceptron with gradient $\times$ input attribution to score each SC edge's contribution to tau prediction, then translates these attribution scores into multi-scale pathway maps (backbone edges, high-traffic routes, and hub ROIs), which validates established Braak staging anatomy. Applied to 234 ADNI participants with paired DTI SC and 18F-Flortaucipir PET, SC-TauPath achieves strong cross-validated tau prediction and yields attribution-based pathway maps consistent with established Braak staging anatomy, demonstrating that SC encode spatially specific information about regional tau distribution in AD.2026-06-02T13:57:13ZJing ZhangNorman ScheelMinheng ChenTong ChenYanjun LyuDavid C. ZhuRong ZhangDajiang Zhuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25180v2Quantifying plasticity: a network-based framework linking structure to dynamical regimes2026-06-02T13:27:47ZPlasticity is a fundamental property of complex systems, such as the brain or an organism. Yet it typically remains a descriptive concept inferred retrospectively from observed outcomes, such as modifications in activity or morphology. Here, the network-based operationalization of plasticity is further formalized as the ratio between system size and connectivity strength among system elements. Within this framework, system size determines the dimensionality of the accessible state space, while connectivity strength tunes the system's regime. An optimal range of plasticity -- balancing capacity for change and capacity to maintain coherence -- emerges at intermediate connectivity strength. Notably, this balance coincides with the critical regime, which provides a theoretically motivated benchmark that enables a normalized unit of measure, termed effective plasticity, and comparisons of adaptive efficacy across diverse systems. Plasticity is thus transformed into a predictive tool that quantifies a system's capacity for change before it occurs. Its validity is supported across disciplines and, in particular, by evidence from psychopathology where it anticipates transitions between mental states. At a mechanistic level, plasticity acts as a structural tuning parameter for criticality, reframing their relationship as causal, with plasticity driving criticality rather than merely accompanying it. Furthermore, this network-based operationalization explains how larger systems can more robustly maintain critical dynamics. Crucially, the proposed perspective distinguishes functional regime shifts from thermodynamic phase changes, identifying plasticity as the system-level regulator that shapes and constrains the dynamic repertoire. This framework is applicable across domains, including ecology, economics, and social systems, and may foster cross-disciplinary integration within complexity science.2026-03-26T08:51:35Z16 pages, 4 figuresNeurosci Biobehav Rev; 187:106765 (2026)Igor Branchi10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106765