https://arxiv.org/api/hf+dEWSxD7NYfr0YP4x7wDAdH/Q 2026-06-22T20:27:04Z 12181 495 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26267v1 2026-03-27T10:33:26Z

This work analyzes the RAID dataset to evaluate human responses to affine image distortions, including rotation, translation, scaling, and Gaussian noise. Using Mean Squared Error (MSE), the study establishes human detection thresholds for these distortions, enabling comparison across types. Statistical analysis with ANOVA and Tukey Kramer tests reveals that observers are significantly more sensitive to Gaussian noise, which consistently produced the lowest detection thresholds. Fourier analysis further shows that high-frequency components act as a visual mask for Gaussian noise, demonstrating a strong correlation between high frequency energy and detection thresholds. Additionally, spectral orientation influences the perception of rotation. Finally, the study employs the PixelCNN model to show that image probability significantly correlates with detection thresholds for most distortions, suggesting that statistical likelihood affects human visual tolerance.

2026-03-27T10:33:26Z Paula Daudén-Oliver David Agost-Beltran Emilio Sansano-Sansano Raul Montoliu Valero Laparra Jesús Malo Marina Martínez-Garcia http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09011v2 2026-03-27T08:37:32Z

A rapidly alternating red and black display known as Ganzflicker induces visual hallucinations that reflect the generative capacity of the visual system. Individuals vary in their degree of visual imagery, ranging from absent to vivid imagery. Recent proposals suggest that differences in the visual system along this imagery spectrum should also influence the complexity of other internally generated visual experiences. Here, we used tools from natural language processing to analyze free-text descriptions of hallucinations from over 4,000 participants, asking whether people with different imagery phenotypes see different things in their mind's eye during Ganzflicker-induced hallucinations. Topic modeling of descriptions revealed that strong imagers described complex, naturalistic content, while weak imagers reported simple geometric patterns. Using crowd-sourced sensorimotor norms, we also found that participants with stronger imagery used language with richer perceptual associations. These findings may reflect individual variation in coordination between early visual areas and higher-order regions relevant for the imagery spectrum.

2025-07-11T20:30:29Z Ana Chkhaidze Reshanne R. Reeder Connor Gag Anastasia Kiyonaga Seana Coulson 10.1093/nc/niag016 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06222v1 2026-03-27T03:25:27Z

Why do we forget? Why do we remember things that never happened? The conventional answer points to biological hardware. We propose a different one: geometry. Here we show that high-dimensional embedding spaces, subjected to noise, interference, and temporal degradation, reproduce quantitative signatures of human memory with no phenomenon-specific engineering. Power-law forgetting ($b = 0.460 \pm 0.183$, human $b \approx 0.5$) arises from interference among competing memories, not from decay. The identical decay function without competitors yields $b \approx 0.009$, fifty times smaller. Time alone does not produce forgetting in this system. Competition does. Production embedding models (nominally 384--1{,}024 dimensions) concentrate their variance in only ${\sim}16$ effective dimensions, placing them deep in the interference-vulnerable regime. False memories require no engineering at all: cosine similarity on unmodified pre-trained embeddings reproduces the Deese--Roediger--McDermott false alarm rate ($0.583$ versus human ${\sim}0.55$) with zero parameter tuning and no boundary conditions. We did not build a false memory system. We found one already present in the raw geometry of semantic space. These results suggest that core memory phenomena are not bugs of biological implementation but features of any system that organizes information by meaning and retrieves it by proximity.

2026-03-27T03:25:27Z Sambartha Ray Barman Andrey Starenky Sophia Bodnar Nikhil Narasimhan Ashwin Gopinath http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26007v1 2026-03-27T01:53:59Z

Predicting whether someone with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) will progress to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial in the early stages of neurodegeneration. This uncertainty limits enrollment in clinical trials and delays urgent treatment. The Boundary Sharpness Coefficient (BSC) measures how well-defined the gray-white matter boundary looks on structural MRI. This study measures how BSC changes over time, namely, how fast the boundary degrades each year works much better than looking at a single baseline scan for predicting MCI-to-AD conversion. This study analyzed 1,824 T1-weighted MRI scans from 450 ADNI subjects (95 converters, 355 stable; mean follow-up: 4.84 years). BSC voxel-wise maps were computed using tissue segmentation at the gray-white matter cortical ribbon. Previous studies have used CNN and RNN models that reached 96.0% accuracy for AD classification and 84.2% for MCI conversion, but those approaches disregard specific regions within the brain. This study focused specifically on the gray-white matter interface. The approach uses temporal slope features capturing boundary degradation rates, feeding them into Random Survival Forest, a non-parametric ensemble method for right-censored survival data. The Random Survival Forest trained on BSC slopes achieved a test C-index of 0.63, a 163% improvement over baseline parametric models (test C-index: 0.24). Structural MRI costs a fraction of PET imaging ($800--$1,500 vs. $5,000--$7,000) and does not require CSF collection. These temporal biomarkers could help with patient-centered safety screening as well as risk assessment.

2026-03-27T01:53:59Z Ishaan Cherukuri http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25991v1 2026-03-27T00:30:59Z

Recent advances in neurotechnologies and decades of scientific and clinical research have made closed-loop electrical neuromodulation one of the most promising avenues for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), a condition that affects over 15 million individuals globally. Yet, with the existing clinical state of the art, only 18% of patients with DRE who undergo closed-loop neuromodulation become seizure-free. In a recent study, we demonstrated that a simple proportional feedback policy based on the framework of passivity-based control (PBC) can significantly outperform the clinical state of the art. However, this study was purely numerical and lacked rigorous mathematical analysis. The present study addresses this gap and provides the first rigorous analysis of PBC for the closed-loop control of epileptic seizures. Using the celebrated Epileptor neural mass model of epilepsy, we analytically demonstrate that (i) seizure dynamics are, in their standard form, neither passive nor passivatable, (ii) epileptic dynamics, despite their lack of passivity, can be stabilized by sufficiently strong passive feedback, and (iii) seizure dynamics can be passivated via proper output redesign. To our knowledge, our results provide the first rigorous passivity-based analysis of epileptic seizure dynamics, as well as a theoretically-grounded framework for sensor placement and feedback design for a new form of closed-loop neuromodulation with the potential to transform seizure management in DRE.

2026-03-27T00:30:59Z Gagan Acharya Erfan Nozari http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25713v1 2026-03-26T17:54:38Z

High-resolution brain imaging can now capture not just synapse locations but their molecular composition, with the cost of such mapping falling exponentially. Yet such ultrastructural data has so far told us little about local neuronal physiology - specifically, the parameters (e.g., synaptic efficacies, local conductances) that govern neural dynamics. We propose to translate molecularly annotated ultrastructure into physiology, introducing the concept of an ultrastructure-to-dynamics compiler: a learned mapping from molecularly annotated ultrastructure to simulator-ready, uncertainty-aware physiological parameters. The requirement is paired training data, with jointly acquired ultrastructure from imaging, and dynamical responses to perturbations from physiological experiments. With this data we can train models that predict local physiology directly from structure. Such a compiler would support biophysical simulations by turning anatomical maps into models of circuit dynamics, shifting structure-to-function from a descriptive program to a predictive one and opening routes to understanding neural computation and forecasting intervention effects.

2026-03-26T17:54:38Z Konrad P. Kording Anton Arkhipov Davy Deng Sean Escola Seth G. N. Grant Gal Haspel Michał Januszewski Narayanan Kasthuri Nina Khera Richie E. Kohman Grace Lindsay Jeantine Lunshof Adam Marblestone David A. Markowitz Jordan Matelsky Brett Mensh Patrick Mineault Andrew Payne Joanne Peng Xaq Pitkow Philip Shiu Gregor Schuhknecht Sven Truckenbrodt Joshua T. Vogelstein Edward S. Boyden http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26811v1 2026-03-26T15:44:07Z

Implicit neural representations (INRs) offer continuous coordinate-based encodings for atlas registration, cross-modality resampling, sparse-view completion, and compact sharing of neuroanatomical data. Yet reproducible evaluation is lacking for high-resolution larval zebrafish microscopy, where preserving neuropil boundaries and fine neuronal processes is critical. We present a reproducible INR benchmark for the MapZebrain larval zebrafish brain atlas. Using a unified, seed-controlled protocol, we compare SIREN, Fourier features, Haar positional encoding, and a multi-resolution grid on 950 grayscale microscopy images, including atlas slices and single-neuron projections. Images are normalized with per-image (1,99) percentiles estimated from 10% of pixels in non-held-out columns, and spatial generalization is tested with a deterministic 40% column-wise hold-out along the X-axis. Haar and Fourier achieve the strongest macro-averaged reconstruction fidelity on held-out columns (about 26 dB), while the grid is moderately behind. SIREN performs worse in macro averages but remains competitive on area-weighted micro averages in the all-in-one regime. SSIM and edge-focused error further show that Haar and Fourier preserve boundaries more accurately. These results indicate that explicit spectral and multiscale encodings better capture high-frequency neuroanatomical detail than smoother-bias alternatives. For MapZebrain workflows, Haar and Fourier are best suited to boundary-sensitive tasks such as atlas registration, label transfer, and morphology-preserving sharing, while SIREN remains a lightweight baseline for background modelling or denoising.

2026-03-26T15:44:07Z Agnieszka Pregowska http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04454v2 2026-03-26T14:40:31Z

We consider the problem of fitting a reinforcement learning (RL) model to some given behavioral data under a multi-armed bandit environment. These models have received much attention in recent years for characterizing human and animal decision making behavior. We provide a generic mathematical optimization problem formulation for the fitting problem of a wide range of RL models that appear frequently in scientific research applications. We then provide a detailed theoretical analysis of its convexity properties. Based on the theoretical results, we introduce a novel solution method for the fitting problem of RL models based on convex relaxation and optimization. Our method is then evaluated in several simulated and real-world bandit environments to compare with some benchmark methods that appear in the literature. Numerical results indicate that our method achieves comparable performance to the state-of-the-art, while significantly reducing computation time. We also provide an open-source Python package for our proposed method to empower researchers to apply it in the analysis of their datasets directly, without prior knowledge of convex optimization.

2025-11-06T15:24:40Z Front. Appl. Math. Stat., 12:1762084, 2026 Hao Zhu Jasper Hoffmann Baohe Zhang Joschka Boedecker 10.3389/fams.2026.1762084 http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04810v4 2026-03-26T14:14:31Z

The backpropagation algorithm has experienced remarkable success in training large-scale artificial neural networks; however, its biological plausibility has been strongly criticized, and it remains an open question whether the brain employs supervised learning mechanisms akin to it. Here, we propose correlative information maximization between layer activations as an alternative normative approach to describe the signal propagation in biological neural networks in both forward and backward directions. This new framework addresses many concerns about the biological-plausibility of conventional artificial neural networks and the backpropagation algorithm. The coordinate descent-based optimization of the corresponding objective, combined with the mean square error loss function for fitting labeled supervision data, gives rise to a neural network structure that emulates a more biologically realistic network of multi-compartment pyramidal neurons with dendritic processing and lateral inhibitory neurons. Furthermore, our approach provides a natural resolution to the weight symmetry problem between forward and backward signal propagation paths, a significant critique against the plausibility of the conventional backpropagation algorithm. This is achieved by leveraging two alternative, yet equivalent forms of the correlative mutual information objective. These alternatives intrinsically lead to forward and backward prediction networks without weight symmetry issues, providing a compelling solution to this long-standing challenge.

2023-06-07T22:14:33Z Neurips published version Bariscan Bozkurt Cengiz Pehlevan Alper T Erdogan http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25444v1 2026-03-26T13:39:45Z

If the universe follows a specific design, then a central question is which cost function is optimized by the observed forces. This is the problem of inverse optimal control, or inverse reinforcement learning, in which a reward function is inferred from the dynamics of the observed system. We first establish the {\em least cost principle}, whereby the laws of motion can be derived from minimization of a time-discounted integral of the acceleration cost minus a state-dependent reward function. After determining the functional form of the acceleration cost from basic principles, we infer the reward function from the laws of motion governing classical gravitation and Coulomb forces. The inferred reward function is high when pairs of particles have high relative velocities and when their relative motion is orthogonal to their distance vectors. All in all, our work suggests that relative motion and quasi-circular orbits are the dynamical and static features optimized by central forces in nature.

2026-03-26T13:39:45Z 12 pages, 1 figure Rubén Moreno-Bote http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14418v2 2026-03-25T21:51:09Z

In attitude theory, formal theoretical predictions come largely from the simulation of computational models. We argue that to push attitude theory further, we should employ mathematical analysis/analytic methods alongside of computational simulation, something that other sciences and engineering consider standard practice. Our work first attempts to portray the complementary nature of mathematical analysis along side of computational simulation using as an example the Causal Attitude Network model of attitudes (Dalege et al., 2016). We then introduce a mathematical theory, Graph Dynamical Systems (GDS), as a broad theoretical framework for network models of attitudes. We illustrate the use of GDS, in the context of the Attitudes as Constraint Satistfaction (ACS) theory of attitude dynamics (Monroe & Read, 2008), as a generator of precise, quantitative theoretical predictions. We conclude by pointing out the value of improved attitude theory for the so-called replication crisis in psychology. KEYWORDS: attitudes, neural networks, dynamical systems, psychological networks

2025-09-17T20:40:31Z This is a version of this work that split the original mathematical treatment into its own piece to fit a different audience Mark G. Orr Emily S. Teti Andrei Bura Henning Mortveit http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14637v3 2026-03-25T15:38:25Z

How do humans move? Advances in reinforcement learning (RL) have produced impressive results in capturing human motion using physics-based humanoid control. However, torque-controlled humanoids fail to model key aspects of human motor control such as biomechanical joint constraints & non-linear and overactuated musculotendon control. We present KINESIS, a model-free motion imitation framework that tackles these challenges. KINESIS is trained on 1.8 hours of locomotion data and achieves strong motion imitation performance on unseen trajectories. Through a negative mining approach, KINESIS learns robust locomotion priors that we leverage to deploy the policy on several downstream tasks such as text-to-control, target point reaching, and football penalty kicks. Importantly, KINESIS learns to generate muscle activity patterns that correlate well with human EMG activity. We show that these results scale seamlessly across biomechanical model complexity, demonstrating control of up to 290 muscles. Overall, the physiological plausibility makes KINESIS a promising model for tackling challenging problems in human motor control. Code, videos and benchmarks are available at https://github.com/amathislab/Kinesis.

2025-03-18T18:37:49Z Accepted to ICRA. Here we include an appendix Merkourios Simos Alberto Silvio Chiappa Alexander Mathis http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24356v1 2026-03-25T14:39:51Z

We derive a Riemannian metric on three-dimensional color space from the Fisher information of neural population codes in the visual pathway. Photoreceptor adaptation, retinal opponent channels, and cortical population encoding each map onto a geometric construction, producing a metric tensor whose components correspond to measurable neural quantities. The resulting 17-parameter model is fitted jointly to four independent threshold datasets: MacAdam's (1942) chromaticity ellipses, the Koenderink et al. (2026) three-dimensional ellipsoids, Wright's (1941) wavelength discrimination function, and the Huang et al. (2012) threshold color difference ellipses, covering 96 independently measured discrimination conditions across varied chromaticities and luminances. The joint fit achieves STRESS of 23.9 on MacAdam, 20.8 on Koenderink et al., 30.1 on Wright, and 30.8 on Huang et al.

2026-03-25T14:39:51Z 20 pages, 3 figures Michael Menke http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23358v1 2026-03-24T15:56:56Z

This proof-of-concept study introduces a novel multimodal framework combining synchronized EEG-fNIRS modalities with neuronal avalanche analysis to identify early network dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. The approach leverages complementary neural signals to examine motor network dynamics during execution and imagery tasks within an interactive task environment. Preliminary analysis of a small pilot cohort (N=4 subjects, including one with Mild Cognitive Impairment) validated the technical feasibility of the multimodal framework and revealed observable condition-dependent patterns in network organization. Two primary observations emerged: a reduced neural contrast between motor execution and imagery states, and increased trial-to-trial variability in network organization in the MCI participant. These initial results successfully validate the technical pipeline and provide hypothesis-generating observations for future statistically powered studies. The convergence of findings across modalities suggests that multimodal assessment of network flexibility may help detect functional changes in early Alzheimer's continuum, supporting the future development of this BCI-inspired framework into an engaging diagnostic tool.

2026-03-24T15:56:56Z Eva Guttmann-Flury Yun-Hsuan Chen Qiaoyuan Xiang Hao Zhang Mohamad Sawan http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23233v1 2026-03-24T14:05:25Z

The disjunction effect in human decision making is often taken to show that the classical law of total probability is violated, motivating quantum-like models. We re-examine this claim for the Prisoner's Dilemma disjunction effect. Under the mental-event reading of the opponent-choice events, the conventional classical decision-process model implicitly builds in a certainty-only premise: its standard partition assumptions leave no room for ambiguity, forcing every participant to be certain that the opponent will defect or will cooperate. We relax this by introducing a new classical model in which each participant carries a continuous expectation parameter representing the anticipated likelihood of opponent defection, and the participant pool is partitioned by expectation level; the resulting ambiguity set is precisely the union of the interior expectation bins. In contrast, under the quantum-like event semantics, ambiguous pure states are generic (dense and of full unitarily invariant measure on the unit sphere), so "certainty states" are mathematically exceptional. We prove that an instance of our classical model can realize any empirically observed triple of defection rates across the three information conditions, including strong disjunction-effect patterns, while strictly obeying the classical law of total probability. We further prove that for any such triple produced by a standard quantum-like model of the same experiment, there exists a classical instance reproducing it exactly. In this sense, classical and quantum-like approaches have the same observable-rate expressiveness; their substantive difference lies in how ambiguity is represented and in their respective event semantics, not in a breakdown of classical probability.

2026-03-24T14:05:25Z 30 pages, 2 figures Ryo Nasu Yoshihiro Maruyama