https://arxiv.org/api/wmR+EEHpzSYc41PJ0WPQOxZ6HFs 2026-06-22T19:20:57Z 12181 480 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29597v1 2026-03-31T11:15:53Z

Reservoirs, typically implemented as recurrent neural networks with fixed random connection weights, can be combined with a simple trained readout layer to perform a wide range of computational tasks. However, increasing the magnitude of reservoir connection weights to exploit nonlinear dynamics can cause the network to develop strong spontaneous activity that drives neurons into saturation, dramatically degrading performance. In this work, we investigate two distinct countermeasures against such runaway excitation. The first approach introduces a subtle non-homogeneous structure into the matrix of connection weigths $w_{ij}$, without altering the overall probability distribution $p(w)$. We identify several favorable structuring principles, such as creating a small subset of neurons with weaker-than-average input connections. Even if the rest of the reservoir falls into runaway saturating behavior, this weakly coupled subset remains in a mildly nonlinear regime whose dynamics can still be exploited by the readout layer. The second approach implements a form of automatic gain control, in which a dedicated control unit dynamically regulates the reservoir's average global activation toward an optimal setpoint. Although the control unit modulates the excitability of the reservoir only via a global gain factor, this mechanism substantially enlarges the dynamical regime favorable for computation and renders performance largely independent of the underlying connection statistics.

2026-03-31T11:15:53Z Claus Metzner Achim Schilling Andreas Maier Thomas Kinfe Patrick Krauss http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24176v2 2026-03-31T09:59:29Z

Capturing dynamic spatiotemporal neural activity is essential for understanding large-scale brain mechanisms. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provides high-resolution cortical representations that form a strong basis for characterizing fine-grained brain activity patterns. The high acquisition cost of fMRI limits large-scale applications, therefore making high-quality fMRI reconstruction a crucial task. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers millisecond-level temporal cues that complement fMRI. Leveraging this complementarity, we present an EEG-conditioned framework for reconstructing dynamic fMRI as continuous neural sequences with high spatial fidelity and strong temporal coherence at the cortical-vertex level. To address sampling irregularities common in real fMRI acquisitions, we incorporate a null-space intermediate-frame reconstruction, enabling measurement-consistent completion of arbitrary intermediate frames and improving sequence continuity and practical applicability. Experiments on the CineBrain dataset demonstrate superior voxel-wise reconstruction quality and robust temporal consistency across whole-brain and functionally specific regions. The reconstructed fMRI also preserves essential functional information, supporting downstream visual decoding tasks. This work provides a new pathway for estimating high-resolution fMRI dynamics from EEG and advances multimodal neuroimaging toward more dynamic brain activity modeling.

2026-03-25T10:53:11Z CVPR 2026 Wanying Qu Jianxiong Gao Wei Wang Yanwei Fu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29176v1 2026-03-31T02:36:10Z

Parkinson's disease (PD) affects over ten million people worldwide. Although temporal interference (TI) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are promising therapies, inter-individual variability limits empirical treatment selection, increasing non-negligible surgical risk and cost. Previous explorations either resort to limited statistical biomarkers that are insufficient to characterize variability, or employ AI-driven methods which is prone to overfitting and opacity. We bridge this gap with a pretraining-finetuning framework to predict outcomes directly from resting-state fMRI. Critically, a generative virtual brain foundation model, pretrained on a collective dataset (2707 subjects, 5621 sessions) to capture universal disorder patterns, was finetuned on PD cohorts receiving TI (n=51) or DBS (n=55) to yield individualized virtual brains with high fidelity to empirical functional connectivity (r=0.935). By constructing counterfactual estimations between pathological and healthy neural states within these personalized models, we predicted clinical responses (TI: AUPR=0.853; DBS: AUPR=0.915), substantially outperforming baselines. External and prospective validations (n=14, n=11) highlight the feasibility of clinical translation. Moreover, our framework provides state-dependent regional patterns linked to response, offering hypothesis-generating mechanistic insights.

2026-03-31T02:36:10Z Siyuan Du Siyi Li Shuwei Bai Ang Li Haolin Li Mingqing Xiao Yang Pan Dongsheng Li Weidi Xie Yanfeng Wang Ya Zhang Chencheng Zhang Jiangchao Yao http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28764v1 2026-03-30T17:59:22Z

Similarity measures are widely used to interpret the representational geometries used by neural networks to solve tasks. Yet, because existing methods compare the extrinsic geometry of representations in state space, rather than their intrinsic geometry, they may fail to capture subtle yet crucial distinctions between fundamentally different neural network solutions. Here, we introduce metric similarity analysis (MSA), a novel method which leverages tools from Riemannian geometry to compare the intrinsic geometry of neural representations under the manifold hypothesis. We show that MSA can be used to i) disentangle features of neural computations in deep networks with different learning regimes, ii) compare nonlinear dynamics, and iii) investigate diffusion models. Hence, we introduce a mathematically grounded and broadly applicable framework to understand the mechanisms behind neural computations by comparing their intrinsic geometries.

2026-03-30T17:59:22Z N Alex Cayco-Gajic Arthur Pellegrino http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28600v1 2026-03-30T15:49:01Z

The dynamics of simple two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) decisions are well-modeled by a class of random walk models (e.g. Laming, 1968; Ratcliff, 1978; Usher & McClelland, 2001; Bogacz et al., 2006). However, in real-life, even simple decisions involve dynamically changing influence of additional information. In this work, we describe a computational theory of decision making from multiple sources of information, grounded in Bayesian inference and consistent with a simple neural network. This Contextual Diffusion Decision Model (CDDM) is a formal generalization of the Diffusion Decision Model (DDM), a popular existing model of fixed-context decision making (Ratcliff, 1978), and shares with it both a mechanistic and a probabilistic motivation. Just as the DDM is a model for a variety of simple two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) decision making tasks, we demonstrate that the CDDM supports a variety of simple context-dependent tasks of longstanding interest in psychology, including the Flanker (Eriksen & Eriksen, 1974), AX-CPT (Servan-Schreiber et al., 1996), Stop-Signal (Logan & Cowan, 1984), Cueing (Posner, 1980), and Prospective Memory paradigms (Einstein & McDaniel, 2005). Further, we use the CDDM to perform a number of normative rational analyses exploring optimal response and memory allocation policies. Finally, we show how the use of a consistent model across tasks allows us to recover consistent qualitative data patterns in multiple tasks, using the same model parameters.

2026-03-30T15:49:01Z Michael Shvartsman Vaibhav Srivastava Narayanan Sundaram Jonathan D. Cohen http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27926v1 2026-03-30T00:51:02Z

This report presents three proofs showing that idealized architectures capable of navigation guided by allocentric maps with landmark structure can be computationally universal. The navigation may occur either online (in the environment) or offline (in the animal's head). The first proof proceeds from a universal two-counter machine by encoding counters as the positions of two movable markers on orthogonal coordinate axes. The second proof directly simulates an ordinary one-tape Turing machine by using a writable tape-path embedded in the map. The third proof strengthens locality by replacing the globally designated path with a two-dimensional field of landmarks that carries only local predecessor/successor information. These constructions are mathematically close to classical graph-based models in computability theory, including Kolmogorov-Uspensky machines, storage-modification machines, graph Turing machines, and related navigation-on-graphs models. Accordingly, the bare universality results are mathematically unsurprising. Nevertheless, the present treatment is, as far as I know, the first self-contained reconstruction of such universality demonstrations in the idiom of allocentric cognitive maps and offline navigation, that is, within an architecture whose core representational and computational primitives are drawn from a body of empirical and theoretical work on spatial navigation. The report therefore reframes known computability-theoretic ideas to show that an allocentric navigation-based architecture can be computationally universal.

2026-03-30T00:51:02Z 15 pages Gualtiero Piccinini http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27716v1 2026-03-29T14:36:58Z

Neuromorphic engineering has matured over the past four decades and is currently experiencing explosive growth with the potential to transform biomedical engineering and neurotechnologies. Participants at the Neuromorphic Principles in Biomedicine and Healthcare (NPBH) Workshop (October 2024) -- representing a broad cross-section of the community, including early-career and established scholars, engineers, scientists, clinicians, industry, and funders -- convened to discuss the state of the field, current and future challenges, and strategies for advancing neuromorphic research and development for biomedical applications. Publicly approved recordings with transcripts (https://2024.neuro-med.org/program/session-video-and-transcripts) and slides (https://2024.neuro-med.org/program/session-slides) can be found at the workshop website.

2026-03-29T14:36:58Z 56 pages; 1 figure Grace M. Hwang Jessica D. Falcone Joseph D. Monaco Courtney R. Pinard Jessica A. Mollick Roger L. Miller Stephanie L. Gage Andrey V. Kanaev Margaret Kim R. Ale Lukaszew Steven M. Zehnder David Rampulla http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27644v1 2026-03-29T11:33:29Z

Understanding how the human brain instantiates distinct emotional states is a key challenge in affective neuroscience. While network-based approaches have advanced emotion processing research,they remain largely descriptive,leaving the dynamical stability of emotional brain states unquantified.This study introduces a novel framework to quantify this stability by applying Hopfield network energy to empirically derived functional connectivity. High density EEG was recorded from 20 healthy adults during a happy versus sad facial expression discrimination task. Functional connectivity was estimated using the weighted Phase Lag Index to obtain artifact-robust,frequency-specific matrices, which served as coupling weights in a continuous Hopfield energy model to calculate a scalar energy value per trial. Statistical comparisons showed sad emotional processing was associated with significantly lower(more negative) energy in delta,theta,and alpha bands,with the strongest effect in the alpha band (Cohen's d =0.83). Energy correlated strongly negatively with global efficiency(r=-0.72),indicating hyperconnected,efficient networks correspond to more stable states.Additionally, alpha-band energy correlated positively with reaction time during sad trials(r=0.61),linking deeper network stability to increased cognitive effort. These findings demonstrate emotional valence corresponds to distinct attractor basins in the brain's functional landscape, with sadness occupying a deeper,more stable configuration than happiness.The Hopfield energy metric provides a principled, quantifiable measure of emotional brain state stability, opening new avenues for understanding affective dynamics in health and disease.

2026-03-29T11:33:29Z 10 pages, 5 figures Barry Djibrina Jiajia Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27611v1 2026-03-29T10:12:15Z

When a cognitive system modifies its own functioning, what exactly does it modify: a low-level rule, a control rule, or the norm that evaluates its own revisions? Cognitive science describes executive control, metacognition, and hierarchical learning with precision, but lacks a formal framework distinguishing these targets of transformation. Contemporary artificial intelligence likewise exhibits self-modification without common criteria for comparison with biological cognition. We show that the question of what counts as a self-modifying system entails a minimal structure: a hierarchy of rules, a fixed core, and a distinction between effective rules, represented rules, and causally accessible rules. Four regimes are identified: (1) action without modification, (2) low-level modification, (3) structural modification, and (4) teleological revision. Each regime is anchored in a cognitive phenomenon and a corresponding artificial system. Applied to humans, the framework yields a central result: a crossing of opacities. Humans have self-representation and causal power concentrated at upper hierarchical levels, while operational levels remain largely opaque. Reflexive artificial systems display the inverse profile: rich representation and causal access at operational levels, but none at the highest evaluative level. This crossed asymmetry provides a structural signature for human-AI comparison. The framework also offers insight into artificial consciousness, with higher-order theories and Attention Schema Theory as special cases. We derive four testable predictions and identify four open problems: the independence of transformativity and autonomy, the viability of self-modification, the teleological lock, and identity under transformation.

2026-03-29T10:12:15Z Working Paper Florentin Koch http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27597v1 2026-03-29T09:39:27Z

Recent work on artificial consciousness shifts evaluation from behaviour to internal architecture, deriving indicators from theories of consciousness and updating credences accordingly. This is progress beyond naive Turing-style tests. But the indicator-based programme remains epistemically under-calibrated: consciousness science is theoretically fragmented, indicators lack independent validation, and no ground truth of artificial phenomenality exists. Under these conditions, probabilistic consciousness attribution to current AI systems is premature. A more defensible near-term strategy is to redirect effort toward biologically grounded engineering -- biohybrid, neuromorphic, and connectome-scale systems -- that reduces the gap with the only domain where consciousness is empirically anchored: living systems.

2026-03-29T09:39:27Z Working Paper (Spotlight Commentary ) Florentin Koch http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27410v1 2026-03-28T21:14:49Z

People infer rich social information from others' actions. These inferences are often constrained by the physical world: what agents can do, what obstacles permit, and how the physical actions of agents causally change an environment and other agents' mental states and behavior. We propose that such rich social perception is more than visual pattern matching, but rather a reasoning process grounded in an integration of intuitive psychology with intuitive physics. To test this hypothesis, we introduced PHASE (PHysically grounded Abstract Social Events), a large dataset of procedurally generated animations, depicting physically simulated two-agent interactions on a 2D surface. Each animation follows the style of the Heider and Simmel movie, with systematic variation in environment geometry, object dynamics, agent capacities, goals, and relationships (friendly/adversarial/neutral). We then present a computational model, SIMPLE, a physics-grounded Bayesian inverse planning model that integrates planning, probabilistic planning, and physics simulation to infer agents' goals and relations from their trajectories. Our experimental results showed that SIMPLE achieved high accuracy and agreement with human judgments across diverse scenarios, while feedforward baseline models -- including strong vision-language models -- and physics-agnostic inverse planning failed to achieve human-level performance and did not align with human judgments. These results suggest that our model provides a computational account for how people understand physically grounded social scenes by inverting a generative model of physics and agents.

2026-03-28T21:14:49Z 26 pages, 11 figures Lance Ying Aydan Y. Huang Aviv Netanyahu Andrei Barbu Boris Katz Joshua B. Tenenbaum Tianmin Shu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27347v1 2026-03-28T17:39:11Z

Quantitative estimation of information flow in early vision with psychophysically realistic networks is still an open issue. This is because, up to date, the necessary elements (general and plausible network, accurate noise, and reliable information measures) have not been put together. As a result, previous works made different approximations that limit the generality of their results. This work combines the following elements for the first time: (1) General and plausible recurrent net: a cascade of linear+nonlinear psychophysically tuned layers [IEEE TIP.06, J.Neurophysiol.19, J.Math.Neurosci.20, Neurocomp.24], augmented to consider top-down feedback following [Nat.Neurosci.21,Neurips.22]. (2) Accurate noise in every layer, which is tuned to reproduce psychometric functions both in contrast detection and discrimination following [J.Vision 25]. (3) Reliable information measures that have been checked with analytical results, both in general [IEEE PAMI 24], and in similar visual neuroscience contexts [Neurocomp.24], and hence can be applied in this (more general) case where analytical results are difficult to obtain. The joint use of these elements allows a reliable study of information flow depending on different connectivity schemes (different nonlinearities and interactions), different noise sources, and different stimuli. Results show the benefits of feedback in two ways: (1) the information loss in the data processing inequality along the pathway is reduced by the V1 -- > LGN recurrence for values of feedback that give stable steady state solutions, and (2) the stability of the net is assessed though standard Poincaré analysis and we find an optimal value for the feedback in terms of the accuracy of the reconstructed signal from the cortical representation.

2026-03-28T17:39:11Z Javier Rodríguez Raquel Giménez Jesús Malo http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14178v1 2026-03-28T08:58:03Z

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in reasoning and tool use, yet they often suffer from rigid, reactive control flows that limit their adaptability and efficiency. Most existing frameworks rely on fixed pipelines or failure-triggered reflection, causing agents to act impulsively or correct errors only after they occur. In this paper, we introduce Heartbeat-Driven Autonomous Thinking Activity Scheduling, a mechanism that enables proactive, adaptive, and continuous self-regulation. Mirroring the natural rhythm of human cognition, our system employs a periodic ``heartbeat'' mechanism to orchestrate a dynamic repertoire of cognitive modules (e.g., Planner, Critic, Recaller, Dreamer). Unlike traditional approaches that rely on hard-coded symbolic rules or immediate reactive triggers, our scheduler learns to determine when to engage specific thinking activities -- such as recalling memories, summarizing experiences, or strategic planning -- based on temporal patterns and historical context. This functional approach allows cognitive modules to be dynamically added or removed without structural reengineering. Meanwhile, we propose a meta-learning strategy for continual policy adaptation, where the scheduler optimizes its cognitive strategy over time using historical interaction logs. Evaluation results demonstrate that our approach effectively learns to schedule cognitive activities based on historical data and can autonomously integrate new thinking modules.

2026-03-28T08:58:03Z Hong Su http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11478v3 2026-03-28T08:43:29Z

Mental events are considered to supervene on physical events. A supervenient event does not change without a corresponding change in the underlying subvenient physical events. Since wholes and their parts exhibit the same supervenience-subvenience relations, inter-level causation has been expected to serve as a model for mental causation. We proposed an inter-level causation mechanism to construct a model of consciousness and an agent's self-determination. However, a significant gap exists between this mechanism and cognitive functions. Here, we demonstrate how to integrate the inter-level causation mechanism with the widely known dual-process theories. We assume that the supervenience level is composed of multiple supervenient functions (i.e., neural networks), and we argue that inter-level causation can be achieved by controlling the feedback error defined through changing algebraic expressions combining these functions. Using inter-level causation allows for a dual laws model in which each level possesses its own distinct dynamics. In this framework, the feedback error is determined independently by two processes: (1) the selection of equations combining supervenient functions, and (2) the negative feedback error reduction to satisfy the equations through adjustments of neurons and synapses. We interpret these two independent feedback controls as Type 1 and Type 2 processes in the dual process theories. As a result, theories of consciousness, agency, and dual process theory are unified into a single framework, and the characteristic features of Type 1 and Type 2 processes are naturally derived.

2026-02-12T01:32:34Z Yoshiyuki Ohmura Yasuo Kuniyoshi http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27188v1 2026-03-28T08:29:48Z

Dissipative cognitive architectures maintain computation through continuous energy expenditure, where units that exhaust their energy are stochastically replaced with fresh random state. This creates a fundamental challenge: how can persistent, context-specific memory survive when all learnable state is periodically destroyed? Existing memory mechanisms -- including elastic weight consolidation, synaptic intelligence, and surprise-driven gating -- rely on gradient computation and are inapplicable to non-gradient dissipative systems. We introduce Deep Memory (DM), a non-gradient persistent memory mechanism operating through a triple-loop consolidation cycle: (1) recording of expert-specific content centroids, (2) seeding of replaced units with stored representations, and (3) stabilization through continuous re-entry. We demonstrate that discrete expert routing via Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) gating is a causal prerequisite for DM, preventing centroid convergence that would render stored memories identical. Across ${\sim}970$ simulation runs spanning thirteen experimental blocks: (i) discrete routing is causally necessary for specialization ($\text{MI}=1.10$ vs. $0.001$; $n=91$); (ii) DM achieves $R=0.984$ vs. $0.385$ without memory ($n=16$); (iii) continuous seeding reconstructs representations after interference ($R_\mathrm{recon}=0.978$; one-shot fails; $n=30$); (iv) the mechanism operates within a characterized $(K,p)$ envelope ($n=350$); (v) recording $\times$ seeding is the minimal critical dyad ($n=40$); (vi) DM outperforms non-gradient baselines (Hopfield, ESN) under matched turnover ($n=370$). These results establish DM as a falsifiable mechanism for persistent memory in non-gradient cognitive systems, with functional parallels to hippocampal consolidation.

2026-03-28T08:29:48Z 28 pages, 7 figures, 6 tables. Submitted to Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. Ancillary file: dm_minimal_reproduction.py (NumPy-only reproduction script, ~200 lines) Jianwei Lou