https://arxiv.org/api/Yc2+fU0gGRPP+LQYggex3sV9rvE 2026-11-13T03:33:04Z 12794 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04575v2 2026-11-11T14:42:42Z

Current paradigms in Artificial Intelligence rely on layers of feedforward networks which model brain activity at the neuronal level. We conjecture that expanding to the level of multiple brain regions with chemical signaling may be a productive step toward understanding the emergence of consciousness. We propose LILITH, a novel architecture that combines developmental training of modular language models with brain-inspired token-based communication protocols, mirroring chemical signaling in the brain. Our approach models distinct brain regions as specialized LLM modules including thinking, memory, sensory, and regulatory components that communicate through emergent token-based signaling protocols analogous to neurotransmitter networks. Unlike traditional pre-trained systems, LILITH would employ developmental training where untrained LLM architectures learn through simulated life experiences, developing communication pathways and cognitive abilities through environmental interaction and evolutionary optimization. This framework would enable direct empirical investigation of consciousness emergence using Integrated Information Theory metrics while providing unprecedented insight into inter-module signaling patterns during development. By optimizing for consciousness emergence rather than task performance, LILITH could provide insight into different emergent phenomena at multiple levels of neural correlates, contrasting neuronal-level processing with multi-region coordination dynamics. The goal of this paper is to put the idea forward while recognizing the substantial challenges in implementing such a system.

2025-07-06T23:18:51Z This paper has been withdrawn by the author as it represents early, preliminary work that the author no longer endorses. Mohid Farooqi Alejandro Comas-Leon http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.15533v1 2026-11-11T14:18:23Z

Untrained convolutional networks have been reported to rival trained networks as models of visual cortex, and we had reported an untrained-network advantage over backpropagation at V1 in THINGS fMRI, together with a dependence on evaluation resolution. Under a pre-specified ridge readout, the untrained network scored below the trained one at every pooling grid (median r difference -0.043 at g = 4, 0 of 5 seeds positive), and also in MSE skill and per-fold r. In exploratory analyses, across 36 combinations of unit normalisation, distance measure and voxel normalisation (28 distinct analyses), the sign of the V1 contrast depended on the analysis (intervals above 0 in 5 and below 0 in 9 distinct analyses), and in our networks the resolution dependence of the original convention appeared in only one cell. Raw correlation-distance representational similarity analysis (RSA) covaried with the alignment of model and voxel patterns with the unit-mean profile (Spearman 0.97 across our networks, 0.79 across six ImageNet architectures); the advantage was absent from the component orthogonal to the mean profile, and the parallel component alone did not resolve it. On the unweighted angular component of centred patterns, trained networks were ahead at V1 (our network and 5 of 6 ImageNet models) and at LOC (all seven); the norm-weighted angular term was not resolved. A luminance-and-contrast bank scored above every network under ridge (point estimates), and adding network features under a shared penalty did not improve prediction. Intervals are stimulus-bootstrap intervals for three subjects, and 6 pre-stated predictions were not met. We recommend reporting sensitivity to centring over the evaluated stimuli on both sides, reporting components separately, and including a small multiverse and simple baselines.

2026-11-11T14:18:23Z 31 pages, 6 figures; code and data pipeline: https://github.com/nilsleut/ridge-readout Nils Leutenegger http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14833v2 2026-11-11T13:02:42Z

Mind wandering often continues without recognition, raising a question about the relationship between attention and consciousness. How can a distraction be experienced before it is recognized as an attentional lapse, and what does recognition change? We address it for mind wandering, a form of spontaneous thought, during focused-attention meditation on the breath, through a computational phenomenology informed by Buddhist analyses of mind and meditation neuroscience. In an active-inference-inspired three-layer architecture, mental contents, termed thoughtseeds, are inferred from simulated large-scale brain network activity and compete for a capacity-limited global workspace, whose selection parallels Bengio's consciousness prior, while a separate graded monitor supports discrete recognition of lapses. Within a specified cycle of Breath Focus, Mind Wandering, Meta Awareness and Redirect Attention, recognition could begin while a distraction still held the workspace, an overlap that was usually brief. Stochastic monitoring checks also allowed intermittent recognition during ongoing wandering, with long intervals unrecognized. Recognition releases stabilization of the current regime and modulates the return policy in Meta Awareness, while return remains possible without it. Breath re-entry, recognition and redirection need not coincide. The model thus separates access to distracting content, monitoring of attention and recognition of a lapse, and shows how awareness of wandering can change its regulation without immediately ending it. This framework could be adapted to other meditation practices, to practice-related differences between novice and expert meditators, and to modeling subjective experience in other cognitive tasks.

2026-07-16T10:53:30Z 46 pages, 8 figures (28 pages and 6 figures in the main text, 18 pages and 2 figures in the supplementary material) Prakash Chandra Kavi Daniel Ari Friedman Gustavo Patow http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25312v4 2026-11-11T11:07:57Z

Plasticity is invoked across the sciences to explain how systems can change, yet it is inferred from the very change it is meant to explain. A system may have many alternatives, realize none and still be plastic. Another may be driven far toward its only alternative, but the magnitude of that change does not establish its plasticity. What matters for plasticity is not how far the system moves but how strongly its present configuration constrains alternatives. Here I propose that plasticity, understood as a prospective property, is inverse configurational constraint: a system is plastic to the extent that its present configuration weakly constrains displacement toward alternatives within a declared representation. For systems sharing a functional partition, structural representation, and normalized architecture, increasing plasticity lowers every positive finite structural barrier separating the current state from its alternatives. With a fixed accessibility criterion, the accessible repertoire can expand but cannot shrink. In network representations, aggregate coupling is identified as configurational constraint, whose inverse defines plasticity. Barrier reduction and repertoire nesting are consequences, not components, of the definition. This connects two research traditions: quantifying connectivity without interpreting it as plasticity, and treating plasticity as a capacity for change without a prospective operational measure.

2026-09-21T19:02:10Z 23 pages, 1 figure Igor Branchi http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14498v2 2026-11-11T10:04:26Z

Biological visual systems compute reliably under tight metabolic and wiring constraints, whereas artificial vision systems consume far more energy and can be sensitive to adversarial perturbations. Whether networks with brain-like wiring are more robust at lower computational cost is unclear. We address this by benchmarking a task-optimized, continuous-time recurrent neural network of the fly visual system constrained by its synaptic connectome (FlyNet) against artificial neural networks. We compare it against CNNs, RAFT, and continuous-time recurrent neural networks without detailed connectome constraints (sCTRNN, CTRNN) on a collision-detection task within a differentiable 3D rendering pipeline. FlyNet is adversarially vulnerable but, relative to its compute, more robust to common video corruptions than RAFT, while using up to five orders of magnitude fewer FLOPs. The CTRNNs remain more robust than FlyNet across almost all tested perturbations, suggesting that connectome constraints benefit efficiency, through their low edge count, over robustness. Recurrence improves robustness to white-box attacks in RAFT and temporal context improves robustness to common corruptions. FlyNet's position and velocity representations degrade under adversarial textures but recover under counterfactual textures that restore correct classification while staying equally far from training, ruling out unfamiliar textures as the cause of failure. The reverse-phi illusion similarly disrupts these representations and inverts the same low-level motion statistic as the adversarial textures. Optimizing this input statistic alone, without access to the network, suffices to induce classification failure, attributing both perturbations to the same circuit vulnerability. Connectome-constrained models can thus surface adversarial failure mechanisms as testable hypotheses about biological perceptual vulnerabilities.

2026-11-10T18:51:31Z 39 pages, 24 figures, 2 tables, Accepted at 40th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2026) Alexandre Garcia-Duran Alejandro Rodriguez-Garcia Manuel Molano-Mazón Alexandre Hyafil Srikanth Ramaswamy Janne K. Lappalainen http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.15204v1 2026-11-11T08:59:54Z

In brain-computer interfaces, inter-subject variability remains a major challenge that limits decoding performance across users. Subject-wise alignment is widely used to improve cross-subject transfer of neural decoders, yet it is typically evaluated only through decoding accuracy, which cannot determine whether aligned representations share greater task-related structure. We therefore distinguish two questions that accuracy conflates: whether alignment removes subject-specific information and whether it makes the relational organization of task conditions more similar across individuals. Using three motor imagery-EEG cohorts, trials are represented as covariance matrices and aligned by recentering each subject's mean covariance to a common reference. Subject-specific information is quantified with a subject-identification probe, whereas relational structure is assessed using representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) computed from condition means with the affine-invariant Riemannian distance. We show that recentering leaves this distance, and therefore the resulting RDMs, unchanged. Consistent with this result, recentering reduces subject identification accuracy from 0.96 to chance level across all cohorts, while altering RDMs only at numerical precision. Cross-subject agreement in relational structure is significantly above zero but below the estimator's lower noise ceiling. Introducing an explicit similarity regularizer during training also fails to increase held-out agreement: the apparent reduction in between-subject differences is explained by a decline in the reliability ceiling rather than improved alignment. These findings show that eliminating subject identity is not equivalent to aligning relational geometry. More broadly, alignment claims must be interpreted relative to the invariances of both the distance and the statistic used to evaluate them.

2026-11-11T08:59:54Z 23 pages (12 pages main text and references, 11 pages appendix), 2 figures. Accepted at NeurIPS 2026, NeurReps Workshop Anna Notaro University of Tuebingen, Germany Letizia Rossato Technical University of Denmark, Denmark Sadasivan Puthusserypady Technical University of Denmark, Denmark http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.15046v1 2026-11-11T05:15:51Z

Deep learning has driven substantial progress in modeling fMRI responses, yet most existing approaches are optimized for a single objective---such as neural encoding, stimulus decoding, or post hoc interpretation---making it difficult to obtain a coherent account of neural representations. We introduce a unified framework that connects vision foundation models to brain activity while supporting neural analysis from multiple complementary perspectives. Our approach replaces black-box features with a sparse, interpretable representation composed of visual prototypes, and links these prototypes to voxel responses through a linear readout. This design makes the model transparent at both levels: prototype activations expose the visual concepts present in the stimulus, while the learned linear weights characterize each voxel's selectivity. Using this interface, we identify which visual concepts drive neural responses and where they appear in the image, reveal cortical organization through voxel tuning in prototype space, and perform controlled stimulus synthesis to probe cortical selectivity through targeted interventions. Together, these results establish prototype-based representations as a unified and interpretable foundation for studying visual representations in the human brain.

2026-11-11T05:15:51Z NeurIPS 2026 Shi Chen Seoyoung Ahn Doris Tsao http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14839v1 2026-11-10T23:41:57Z

Carrier-only stimulation ($Δf = 0$) is generally considered the most rigorous control for temporal interference (TI) stimulation, assumed to reproduce TI's kilohertz carrier field without its low-frequency beat. We show that this assumption is incorrect: without the frequency difference, the carrier fields interfere coherently, changing the peak strength, power, and direction of the resulting field depending on electrode polarity and montage geometry. Using computational field modeling, we demonstrate that these mismatches can be substantial and widespread. We therefore recommend that TI studies report electrode polarity, model both carrier-field exposures, and choose controls according to their study objectives.

2026-11-10T23:41:57Z Ido Haber Giulio Tononi Larissa Albantakis http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14814v1 2026-11-10T22:57:21Z

Readers can move their eyes through a page but retain little of its meaning when their minds wander. We tested whether word properties still guide their eyes during these lapses. We analyzed public eye-tracking and electroencephalography (EEG) data from 44 adults who read articles. They marked the text read during each lapse they noticed. We linked these spans to the sentences needed for later comprehension questions. Word frequency, length and surprisal still predicted which words readers skipped and how long they looked at them. Compared with on-task reading, these effects met equivalence bounds of $\pm$10% for skipping and $\pm$20% for gaze duration. Readers spent 14.6% longer on words during lapses. Yet readers answered less accurately when lapses covered sentences needed for a later question. The adjusted difference was 25.7 percentage points for lapses covering all versus none of these sentences. The fixation-related EEG response was 42.7% smaller during lapses. At left posterior-lateral sensor P7, the median increase in alpha power was 10.0%. Occipital sensor Oz showed no reliable increase. These results suggest that word properties can guide the eyes while readers fail to form or retain a useful representation of the text.

2026-11-10T22:57:21Z Anirudh Natarajan Paul Sajda http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02605v3 2026-11-10T20:13:08Z

Evaluating true metacognition in Large Language Models (LLMs) is difficult due to biases and heuristics. This paper presents a framework to measure and enhance LLM metacognition while controlling for these biases. A measurement method using the $d'_{\rm type2}$ metric is established to isolate metacognitive ability. The Evolution Strategy for Metacognitive Alignment (ESMA) is proposed, demonstrating robust generalization across unseen datasets, languages, and newly acquired knowledge. Gradual parameter updates reveal that these improvements are driven by a sparse set of parameters, opening a potential avenue for targeted metacognitive optimization.

2026-02-02T04:08:13Z Accepted to NeurIPS 2026 Sangjun Park Elliot Meyerson Xin Qiu Risto Miikkulainen http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14508v1 2026-11-10T18:55:48Z

Connectome-constrained models are often used to argue that a measured wiring diagram outperforms shuffled or rewired wiring, and hence that structure shapes function. Such comparisons can confound wiring with how the models are tuned: a connectome fixes who connects to whom, not the excitability, gains or plasticity rates the model also needs, and modellers often tune these until the real-wiring model works. We separate three estimands: physiology tuned on the real wiring and transferred to nulls (P1), each wiring tuned on its own (P2), and P2 restricted to physiology consistent with independent data (P3). The biases involved are known in machine learning (under-tuned baselines, inherited weights, winner's curse); we measure what they do to biological conclusions, using synthetic ground truth, placebo nulls and three Drosophila circuit models. Some claims survive every protocol we test: segregated reward and punishment dopamine improves learning, and head-direction topography is required for a persistent bump. Others do not. In the mushroom body, the real Kenyon-cell output wiring beats a cross-subtype identity shuffle by 0.09 under P1 and P2 but loses to it by 0.09 under P3 (95% CIs exclude zero; held-out runs confirm). The verdict is set by the share of alpha'beta' cells among active Kenyon cells, which P1 selects low; at the share implied by imaging (about 44%) the real-wiring model fails to learn, exposing a model inadequacy rather than a deficit of the fly's wiring. In flyvis, P1 penalises a mirrored connectome, which has a constructed solution within 0.07 (median) of the real error, more than a spatially shuffled one in 50 of 50 members; the ranking survives ten-fold longer retraining but depends on the checkpoint at fifty-fold. A credible structural claim needs matched optimisation, data-constrained physiology and a model that still works there.

2026-11-10T18:55:48Z 23 pages, 5 figures, 10 tables. Code, data and prediction files are included as ancillary files Yeyuan Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14381v1 2026-11-10T17:36:48Z

The brain solves a wide range of problems, and some of these solutions are very good indeed. It is an old idea that, in some cases, these solutions may be as good as possible given the relevant constraints. If this is true we can promote this notion of optimization to a principle from which aspects of function and mechanism can be derived, ideally with no free parameters. Optimization principles are powerful and have had many successes, but they remain controversial. We start with a reminder of a classic example---diffraction limited optics in insect eyes---and then a summary of why you should worry about optimization as a more general principle. Next we turn to recent progress on the theory of optimal motion estimation in fly vision, and finally summarize recent results on the landscape for optimization, arguing that (contrary to widely held intuitions) optimal performance need not require the underlying mechanisms to have finely tuned parameters. I hope to convince you that this is a moment to take optimization seriously as the basis for theories of neural coding and computation. This is based on a rather informal lecture at the summer school LASCON X in Sao Paulo, and I have tried to preserve that tone here; pointers are given to more detailed and technical discussions.

2026-11-10T17:36:48Z Based on a lecture at LASCON X, https://sisne.org/en/lascon-x/ William Bialek http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38437v2 2026-11-10T17:03:57Z

Teleoperation and assistive devices are tuned for channel fidelity, while whether the operator experiences the device as part of the body, the Sense of Embodiment, is measured only afterwards. Minimizing the mismatch between the operator's predictions and the returned feedback fails twice: the predictions cannot be observed, and removing feedback minimizes the objective. We formulate an embodiment-aware controller that instead infers the operator's embodiment and visuo-proprioceptive cue weighting from implicit gaze and pupil signals and task outcome, and chooses bounded device settings under explicit preferences, cast as a discrete Active Inference agent. In simulations with heterogeneous synthetic operators, it raised embodiment from 0.76 to 1.66 on a 0-2 scale over the best fixed setting, within 0.02 of an oracle across ten random seeds; adaptation that did not read the operator gained nothing, and a prediction-error minimizer withheld feedback. An expected-utility controller with the same inference did as well, so the benefit comes from inference over the operator with explicit preferences, not from information seeking. Rules on a single signal came close when that signal was informative and failed when it was not; the controller degraded less, but failed when it trusted an uninformative signal unless briefly calibrated. Against published human data, the model reproduced the embodiment-performance relation, and embodiment developed on a plausible time scale. The embodiment signals were redundant when task success tracked embodiment and became the controller's objective when it did not. Studies with people must first establish calibrated cue-weighting signals and effort-independent embodiment signals.

2026-09-29T19:28:08Z This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible. 20 pages, 4 figures, 7 tables. Code and data: https://github.com/sa-falcone/uee-embodiment-sim (doi:10.5281/zenodo.24106761) Sara Falcone http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14035v1 2026-11-10T13:03:41Z

Foundation models pre-trained on large unlabeled electroencephalography (EEG) corpora have emerged as a transformative paradigm for Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) applications. Recent EEG foundation models have shown that multi-scale representations derived from fixed-length patches can improve EEG representation learning. Existing frameworks commonly construct temporal scales through feature-level operations. However, these operations leave the correspondence between learned features and scale-specific characteristics of the original EEG signals implicit. Moreover, when the self-supervised objective is not aligned with the multi-scale input representations, information at some temporal scales may receive insufficient supervision during pre-training. In light of this, we propose ScaleBrain, a scale-consistent pre-training framework that explicitly coordinates multi-scale representations of EEG from both the model input and optimization objective sides. Specifically, ScaleBrain introduces multi-scale EEG tokenization to represent the same EEG segment through analysis windows with different temporal spans and shared temporal anchors, and pairs these representations with scale-specific reconstruction to align with the multi-scale input structure and provide supervision across temporal resolutions during self-supervised learning. We further develop an axial spatio-temporal attention mechanism to contextualize the fused multi-scale representation along spatial and temporal dimensions. Extensive evaluations on six public BCI benchmarks against 12 representative baselines show that ScaleBrain achieves the highest mean Balanced Accuracy on five datasets and ranks third on the remaining one, with only 5.0M parameters, demonstrating strong performance and favorable parameter efficiency.

2026-11-10T13:03:41Z Minyu Zhou Yajing Wu Yongqiang Tang Wang Jia Wensheng Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33366v3 2026-11-10T12:05:31Z

Theories of consciousness often explain different pieces of the phenomenon, leaving open how to construct an account of the whole. If consciousness is functional, a basic question is what awareness of a content changes in how a system can use it. We review experiments comparing how information X is used in a process Y with and without awareness of X, while constraining differences in the information available about X. The resulting preliminary functional profile links awareness most clearly to attentional control, with narrower evidence for metacognitive evaluation, while simple feature--location binding and retrieval can persist without awareness. But these associations constrain rather than explain consciousness. A full-stack theory must also account for the structure and manner of presentation of perceptual and affective experience, subject--world organisation, awareness judgments, and problem reports. Attention Schema Theory illustrates a possible bridge: using a functional association to motivate an internal process model, then proposing that its information also underlies awareness and associated reports. Generalising this approach, we propose using both functional and explanatory profiles to guide the abductive construction of candidate process architectures, implementing and intervening on them, and progressively testing and refining them against further evidence.

2026-09-27T08:47:40Z 25 pages, 3 figures Sushrut Thorat Paras Chopra