https://arxiv.org/api/OYojSbWFbomaxBA3ByPKHf7FMck 2026-06-10T01:45:15Z 7574 30 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30626v1 2026-05-28T22:24:02Z

We present a community-wide effort to develop a strategy and action plan to advance heliophysics and space weather modeling through open science. While open science has the potential to enhance the quality and pace of scientific discovery, its application to scientific modeling requires more careful consideration regarding open data and open software guidelines, as scientific models differ significantly from data analysis software. We gathered feedback from modeling teams worldwide through a living survey and discussion sessions at the 2024 Open Science Workshop in College Park, USA, and at the 2025 COSPAR ISWAT Working Meeting in Cape Canaveral, USA. We complement these findings with lessons learned from almost 25 years of experience at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center in enabling open use of models. We identify key roadblocks in current open science practices and guidelines and offer recommendations for future progress across four overlapping themes: open use of models and simulation results, open validation, open development, and open collaboration. An essential outcome of the discussion is the need for model developers and model users to speak with a united voice and promote the role of models in future open science efforts. We introduce a new cross-domain community initiative called the Heliophysics Open Modeling Environment (HOME), which will be integrated as an overarching activity within COSPAR ISWAT. HOME will serve as a platform for modelers and model users to work together, facilitate community modeling, improve the scientific return on modeling investment, and advance understanding, modeling, and forecasting in heliophysics and space weather.

2026-05-28T22:24:02Z Accepted for publication in Space Weather C. Corti NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA University of Hawaii at Manoa, Physics and Astronomy Department, USA Universities Space Research Association, USA M. M. Kuznetsova NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA M. A. Reiss NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA Universities Space Research Association, USA J. Yue NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA J. Karpen NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA C. N. Arge NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA F. Bacchini KU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, Belgium C. Bard NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA S. Bruinsma CNES, Space Geodesy Office, France R. M. Caplan Predictive Science Inc., USA L. K. S. Daldorff NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA P. J. Deka KU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, Belgium C. R. DeVore NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA S. Elvidge University of Birmingham, School of Engineering, UK N. Ganushkina University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USA J. D. Huba Syntek Technologies, USA B. V. Jackson University of California San Diego, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, USA V. Jordanova Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA J. A. Linker Predictive Science Inc., USA H. Liu University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USA J. G. Luhmann University of California Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory, USA S. Markidis KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden P. Mayank University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USA V. Merkin Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, USA N. Moens KU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, Belgium D. Odstrcil NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA George Mason University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, USA Y. A. Omelchenko Space Science Institute, USA M. Palmroth University of Helsinki, Department of Physics, Finland Finnish Meteorological Institute, pace and Earth Observation Centre, FFinland S. Poedts KU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, Belgium Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Poland A. J. Ridley University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USA Y. Shou University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USA V. Tenishev NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, USA D. R. Themens University of Birmingham, School of Engineering, UK G. Toth University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USA W. Wang University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USA R. -P. Wilhelm KU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, Belgium M. A. Young University of New Hampshire, USA B. Cecconi Université PSL, Observatoire de Paris, LIRA, France M. -Y. Chou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA D. De Zeeuw NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA G. L. Delzanno Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA C. Didigu NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA M. El Alaoui NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA S. Fung NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA J. Green Space Hazards Applications, USA Z. Huang University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USA University of Science and Technology of China, School of Earth and Space Sciences, China L. K. Jian NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA L. J. Landwer University of Colorado, CIRES, USA NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center, USA M. Lesko NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA P. MacNeice NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA A. Masson European Space Agency, European Space Astronomy Centre, Spain M. L. Mays NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA P. M. Mehta West Virginia University, USA M. S. Miesch University of Colorado, CIRES, USA E. Palmerio Predictive Science Inc., USA M. Petrenko NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA E. Provornikova Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, USA L. Rastätter NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA L. Rusaitis NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA N. Sachdeva University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USA E. Samara NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA D. Sur NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA A. Taktakishvili NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA J. Topper NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA T. Tsui NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA C. Verbeke NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA Universities Space Research Association, USA KU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, Belgium J. Wang NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA The Catholic University of America, USA C. Wiegand NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA M. Wiltberger University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USA Y. Zheng NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA M. M. Bisi RAL Space, United Kingdom Research and Innovation, Science & Technology Facilities Council, UK M. K. Georgoulis Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, USA RCAAM of the Academy of Athens, Greece T. Kodikara German Aerospace Center, Institute for Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Germany T. Pulkkinen University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USA A. Chartier Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, USA D. da Silva NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA A. Faturahman National Research and Innovation Agency, Research Center for Space, Indonesia K. Garcia-Sage NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA D. Kondrashov University of California Los Angeles, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, USA V. E. Ledvina University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, USA W. Liu University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USA C. Pandey Texas Christian University, USA E. Resnick NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USA ASRC Federal, USA C. Shi Auburn University, Department of Physics, USA R. S. Weigel George Mason University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, USA K. Whitman KBR, USA NASA Johnson Space Flight Center, USA I. Zakharenkova University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USA K. Zhang University of California Los Angeles, Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, USA Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Department of Physical Sciences, USA. Mostafa El Alaoui sadly passed away during the preparation of this paper, Shing Fung retired from NASA in May 2026 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30620v1 2026-05-28T22:15:57Z

The dayside cusp provides a direct pathway for solar wind plasma entry into the magnetosphere ionosphere system through magnetic reconnection. Using low altitude ion and electron measurements from TRACERS, together with upstream solar wind and geomagnetic conditions, we investigate the evolution of the cusp during a geomagnetic storm on 30 September 2025, spanning its rising, main, and recovery phases, and compare these with a quiet-time reference. Storm-time observations show broader and more poleward precipitation regions and enhanced electron energy flux, indicating intensified dayside coupling. To interpret these variations, we combine solar wind and IMF measurements with the maximum magnetic shear reconnection model to determine X-line locations and use a Tsyganenko field model to compute event-specific field-line transit distances between the X-line and TRACERS. The results demonstrate that cusp morphology and latitude track IMF-driven reconnection geometry, and that realistic path lengths are essential for quantitative reconnection-rate estimates, highlighting the capability of TRACERS to resolve storm-time cusp evolution. Enhanced cusp precipitation during the recovery phase is consistent with IMF conditions, indicating sustained solar wind driving rather than intrinsic storm-phase effects.

2026-05-28T22:15:57Z Submitted to JGR: space Physics (under review) Shirsh Lata Soni David M. Miles Jasper Halekas Stephen A. Fuselier George Hospodarsky Marit Øieroset K. J. Trattner S. M. Petrinec Jeremy Faden Ivar Christopher Chris Pikar Sarah A. Henderson Daniel Da Silva Scott Bounds Robert Strangeway http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29244v1 2026-05-28T02:02:34Z

Magnetic reconnection is a ubiquitous plasma phenomenon that plays a critical role in particle heating and energization. During reconnection, the topology of magnetic field rearranges, depositing energy into the surrounding plasma through bulk flow, thermal heating, or non-thermal particle acceleration. While the pathways of this transformation from magnetic energy into kinetic have been studied extensively in recent years through theoretical or case-by-case observations, comprehensive statistical studies remain limited. In this paper, we present a statistical investigation using data from the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission, and detail the particle energization mechanisms in magnetic structures found near reconnecting regions in turbulent Earth's magnetotail. We find that electrons with motion perpendicular to the magnetic field dominate $\vec{j}\cdot\vec{E}$ dissipation. In contrast to the conventional picture of unidirectional energy transfer to particles by laminar two-dimensional (2D) reconnection, we find that energy exchange within magnetic structures during turbulent reconnection tends to be bidirectional with only a small positive bias from electromagnetic fields to particles. Specific electron energization mechanisms are quantified, including those due to parallel electric field, Fermi energization from curvature drift, betatron heating from magnetic field inhomogeneity, and polarization drift.

2026-05-28T02:02:34Z 18 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in Journal of Geophysical Research - Space Physics Rachel Wang Hantao Ji Adam Robbins Kendra Bergstedt Narges Ahmadi Robert Ergun Li-Jen Chen Jongsoo Yoo Peiyun Shi Yuka Doke http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29150v1 2026-05-27T22:21:26Z

Hydrodynamic shielding is a theoretically well-established but observationally elusive and experimentally difficult-to-replicate phenomenon with implications that extend far beyond meteor physics. Rare earthgrazing meteoroids with infrasound signatures that penetrate to the ground can be used to probe hydrodynamic shielding that leads to strong shock formation at high altitude. Here, we report the first coordinated optical and multi-station infrasound observations of a centimeter-scale earthgrazing fireball that generated sustained cylindrical line shock at thermospheric altitudes near 92 km. The event was recorded by numerous optical stations and three infrasound arrays, allowing trajectory reconstruction, ablation behavior, acoustic source localization, and shock characteristics. Optical observations indicate early mechanical erosion and ablation/evaporation at exceptionally low dynamic pressure, consistent with a cometary or a porous, volatile-bearing CM chondritic object. Independent infrasound detections localize shock generation to multiple points along a 164 km trajectory segment near perigee. Weak-shock modeling yields a consistent blast radius of ~30 m, implying an acoustic-equivalent source size far exceeding the physical dimensions of the ~45 g nucleus. We demonstrate that classical gas dynamics and ablation-driven hydrodynamic shielding alone cannot account for these observations under ambient thermospheric conditions. We show that volatile release provides the additional flow-field density enhancement required to amplify hydrodynamic shielding, reduce the effective local Knudsen number, and sustain a shock envelope capable of radiating detectable infrasound. These results demonstrate that small, volatile-rich meteoroids can transiently establish continuum-like flow in rarefied environments.

2026-05-27T22:21:26Z 81 pages, 12 figures, Appendices Icarus, 117184 (2026) Elizabeth A. Silber Denis Vida Miro Ronac Giannone Jamie Shepherd Sarah Albert Daniel C. Bowman Tammy Do Margaret Campbell-Brown Peter Jenniskens Reynold E. Silber 10.1016/j.icarus.2026.117184 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29124v1 2026-05-27T21:35:27Z

We investigate the February 19, 2025, re-entry of a Falcon 9 upper stage using optical observations from 43 meteor cameras across central Europe together with radar detections of re-entry plasma obtained with the 32.55 MHz SIMONe Germany multistatic radar system. Optical observations of fragment emissions between 85 and 36 km altitude were used to reconstruct 30 fragment trajectories, identify two main fragment families, and fit ballistic trajectories to estimate kinetic energy loss per unit mass. The optical detection-height distribution peaks near 60 km with a standard deviation of 10 km, and both optical and radar signatures occur in the same broad altitude region as the maximum kinetic-energy loss. Radar echoes were detected at altitudes between 55 and 75 km, and the radar-derived positions are consistent with those obtained from optical observations. Two distinct radar echo types associated with the re-entry plasma were identified: (1) specular trail echoes from overdense wake plasma, with radar cross-sections (RCS) of up to 60 dBsm, and (2) short-lived non-specular trail echoes with RCS values of 20--30 dBsm, exhibiting a delay of 1--2 s compared to optical signatures. The characteristic decay time of both echo types is approximately 1 s. In the radar-echo altitude range, the estimated Knudsen numbers for meter-scale fragments are well below unity, consistent with continuum-flow conditions and shock-driven plasma production rather than ordinary meteor-like impact ionization. These serendipitous radar observations demonstrate that the atmospheric re-entry of other spacecraft, including objects smaller than the Falcon 9 upper stage such as Starlink satellites, may likewise be detectable using comparable multistatic meteor radar systems deployed globally.

2026-05-27T21:35:27Z 26 pages, 9 figures. Data and code: https://github.com/jvierine/falcon9 ; data release: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20070800 Juha Vierinen Dabrowka Knach Jorge L. Chau Gerd Baumgarten Devin Huyghebaert Matthias Clahsen Nico Pfeffer Toralf Renkwitz Robin Wing Kenneth S. Obenberger Björn Gustavsson Daniel Kastinen http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29118v1 2026-05-27T21:25:52Z

Some optical measurements require relative timing of intensity variations with accuracy much finer than the camera frame period. One motivating example is dynamic aurora, where different prompt emissions are expected to originate from different altitude regions and can therefore have millisecond-scale relative delays caused by finite energetic-electron velocities and other electron-transport effects. These delays are predicted to be a small fraction of the frame duration of typical auroral video cameras. We present a cross-spectral technique for estimating the relative delay between two time-varying optical intensity signals recorded by one or more image sensors. The method is validated with a calibration device that generates two pseudorandomly pulsed optical emissions with a known relative delay, recorded using a consumer smartphone camera. For the tested recordings, the method estimates relative delays between image-sensor regions with better than $50$~$μ$s accuracy. Although developed for high-frame-rate auroral imaging, the technique has numerous other imaging applications, including camera timing calibration and measurements of time-varying optical signals. The single-camera tests demonstrate that the method can characterize sub-frame timing differences across an image sensor, such as those produced by rolling-shutter readout. The same analysis applies to separate cameras when they observe the same time-varying signal and are synchronized to a shared clock.

2026-05-27T21:25:52Z 12 pages, 6 figures. Code available at https://github.com/jvierine/image_xc_delay Juha Vierinen Pavithiran Sivasothy Björn Gustavsson http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28407v1 2026-05-27T12:41:39Z

Measurements of interplanetary magnetic fields have long relied on spacecraft measurements, which provide only in-situ sampling and therefore cannot capture the global magnetic structure. Faraday rotation of radio signals extends in-situ measurements to line-of-sight measurements, but it still depends on the number and spatial distribution of available radio sources. The Zeeman effect offers another route to remote sensing of magnetic fields, but it is generally too weak to diagnose the weak interplanetary magnetic fields. Here, we present a remote-sensing method to constrain weak magnetic field strength and orientation using spectral-line polarization induced by ground-state alignment (GSA) and Hanle effect, with collisional effects taken into account. This method is sensitive to weak magnetic fields in environments ranging from the high solar atmosphere and solar wind to the outer heliosphere, and we identify suitable spectral lines for different targets. We further perform forward modeling of Mercury's magnetosphere to demonstrate the feasibility of this imaging method. Spectral-polarization imaging therefore provides a new way toward remote imaging of dynamic heliospheric magnetic structures.

2026-05-27T12:41:39Z 4 Figures, 1 Table Chuanpeng Hou Huirong Yan Siqi Zhao http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00925v2 2026-05-27T11:15:53Z

An astrosphere is a vast, tailed bubble-like volume around a star, formed through the interaction between the stellar magnetic field, the stellar wind, and the interstellar medium (ISM). Detecting and characterizing astrospheres are essential for constraining stellar wind properties, understanding stellar evolution, and assessing the habitability of surrounding exoplanetary systems. Charge exchanges between ionized stellar wind particles and cold ISM hydrogen atoms populate the astrosphere with neutral hydrogen, which can leave observable signatures in the Lyman-$α$ (Ly$α$) line absorption profile. Previous studies have inferred stellar mass-loss rates by measuring Ly$α$ absorption in stellar spectra caused by astrospheric neutral hydrogen. However, our knowledge of the global morphology of astrospheres remains limited and largely dependent on sometimes contradictory simulations. Here we investigate the feasibility of detecting Ly$α$ emission generated by resonant scattering from \NH{} surrounding the star, enabling the construction of a two-dimensional map of the astrosphere. With a three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic astrosphere model, we perform forward modelling of the Ly$α$ emission and assess the observation feasibility according to the observational limits of the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} (HST). We further discuss the influence of varied line-of-sight orientations and averaged ISM velocity along the line-of-sight. The spatially resolved circumstellar Ly$α$ emission could provide important constraints on the astrospheric configuration and stellar wind properties, such as the bow shock standing distance, the stellar wind symmetry, and the shape of the astro-tail. Our results highlight Ly$α$ astrosphere detections as a promising science case for {\it HST} and future missions such as the \textit{Habitable Worlds Observatory}.}

2026-04-01T14:04:20Z 12 pages, 7 figures. Accepted by ApJL Ziqi Wu Tom Van Doorsselaere Jiansen He Hugues Sana Nicholas Jannsen Tianhang Chen Weining Wang Zheng Sun http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26790v2 2026-05-27T06:35:10Z

Low-thrust trajectory design relies heavily on repeated evaluations of fuel consumption and transfer feasibility, which require expensive optimal control solutions. In this work, we show these quantities can be accurately approximated by machine learning surrogates, enabling fast and scalable evaluation across a wide range of scenarios. By increasing both dataset size and model capacity, we observe that low-thrust trajectory optimization follows a scaling law, with performance improving linearly with the logarithm of training data and network parameters, and no evidence of saturation within the explored regime. Guided by this observation, we construct a large-scale dataset using the proposed homotopy-ray strategy tailored to mission design requirements. A key is the introduction of a self-similar transformation, which allows generalization across semi-major axes, inclinations, and central bodies avoiding retraining. As a result, the same neural approximator can be applied to diverse orbital environments and mission classes. The proposed models accurately predict optimal fuel consumption and minimum transfer time for single- and multi-revolution transfers. Their performance and generalization are demonstrated on a public dataset, a multi-asteroid flyby problem from the Global Trajectory Optimization Competition, and an asteroid rendezvous mission design. The models and datasets are released as open-source to support the space community.

2026-05-26T10:01:45Z Submitted to the Journal of Guidance, Navigation and Control. Zenodo entry: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18769170 Zhong Zhang Giacomo Acciarini Dario Izzo Hexi Baoyin Francesco Topputo http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24038v2 2026-05-26T03:38:43Z

Forecasting aurora borealis visibility matters for space weather research and aurora tourism. Visibility at a site and night depends on two distinct factors: (1) whether aurora is physically occurring, driven by solar wind-magnetosphere coupling, and (2) whether observing conditions allow naked-eye detection, mainly cloud cover and lunar illumination. We present Aurora Hunter, a two-stage cascade that decouples these factors. Stage 1 predicts P(occurring) with XGBoost using 51 physics-driven features trained on joint Tromso+Kiruna data (about 16,600 hourly samples, 2015-2023) with labels from the Tromso AI all-sky image classifier. Stage 2 predicts P(clear observation given occurring) with logistic regression using 21 cloud-cover and lunar-illumination features trained only on aurora-occurring hours. The cascade P(visible)=P(occurring)*P(clear|occurring) reaches ROC-AUC 0.937 (Tromso test, 2019-2020) and 0.905 (independent Kiruna, 2024), improving a single-stage baseline by +0.087. Held-out Skibotn data (2022-2025) confirm cross-site generalization. SHAP identifies the Kp x nightside interaction, MLT position, and auroral oval distance as dominant predictors (39% combined). Prototype: https://aurora-hunter.onrender.com.

2026-05-21T14:32:21Z Zongyuan Ge Chenwaner Zhang Haoyang Li Hantai Zhang Wei Zhou Wenxin Gu Zhaoming Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07566v1 2026-05-25T19:49:06Z

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are explosive and energetic events consisting of strong magnetic structures erupting from the solar corona. We use superposed epoch analysis to investigate the general properties of CMEs as measured {\it in situ} from 0.2 to 2.2 au based on over 1600 events obtained from the HELIO4CAST catalog. We examine the dependence of the CME global properties on solar cycle phase, and compare the CME parameters derived in the active phase (AP) with the quiet phase (QP). Our findings show that during the AP of the solar cycle, the occurring CMEs are faster and have stronger magnetic field strength than during the QP, which has denser but weaker magnetic strength. These differences in magnetic field strength and density remain even when controlling for the speed. This may indicate that the enhanced profiles observed during the AP are not only a consequence of the CME propagation speed but may also reflect intrinsic differences in the eruption mechanism during different solar cycle phases. We also study how the magnetic field strength and components of the CME magnetic ejecta (ME) structure evolve with heliocentric distance. We find that the toroidal and poloidal ME magnetic field components have a similar power law decrease with distance, indicating a comparable expansion behavior of CMEs in these dimensions. We further quantify the CME magnetic field asymmetry %(often associated with CME aging) using the front-to-rear ratio of the toroidal component across heliocentric distance and find evidence of an increase of this ratio with heliocentric distance.

2026-05-25T19:49:06Z Yakub Olufadi Nada Al-Haddad Florian Regnault Noé Lugaz Bin Zhuang Charles J. Farrugia Christian Möstl Emma E. Davies Eva Weiler http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25117v1 2026-05-24T15:03:50Z

The $\textit{Parker Solar Probe}$ ($\textit{PSP}$) mission has observed near-continuous power in parallel ion cyclotron waves (PICWs) in the young, fast solar wind. These waves are unlikely to be directly produced by the turbulent cascade and are likely born of a local instability; yet, they are observed to both cool -- and heat -- the plasma. We propose that these observations can be self-consistently explained as the natural consequence of PICWs propagating in the inhomogeneous solar wind after they have been driven unstable. In this work, we argue that strong proton heating by a turbulent cascade of oblique ICWs will result in PICWs being driven unstable in a process known as quasi-linear focusing. Because the power in the turbulent cascade is concentrated at scales above the turbulent transition region, PICWs will be driven unstable within a range of wave numbers parallel to the background magnetic field, $k_\parallel$, that is bounded from above by $k_{\parallel\rm P}^*$, corresponding to the start of the transition region. As unstable PICWs propagate away from the sun to regions of lower proton density, their $k_\parallel$, multiplied by the proton inertial length $d_{\rm p}$, increases. Eventually, the $k_\parallel d_{\rm p}$ of the PICWs becomes larger than $k_{\parallel\rm P}^*d_{\rm p}$ and the waves damp, heating the solar wind. We call this effect `cyclotron breaking', in analogy with ocean waves breaking on the shore. We then discuss the testable predictions of the theory, including a distinct heating signature in which PICWs cool fast protons and heat slow protons at any given heliocentric distance $r$. Finally, we conjecture that cyclotron breaking can lead to net heating by PICWs if the power emitted as PICWs decreases sufficiently rapidly with $r$ that local emission of PICWs is overwhelmed by the local damping of PICWs generated closer to the sun.

2026-05-24T15:03:50Z 16 pages, 4 figures, submitted to Journal of Plasma Physics Evan L. Yerger Benjamin D. G. Chandran Vincent David Trevor A. Bowen Stuart D. Bale http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04293v2 2026-05-23T19:30:54Z

Cosmic magnetic fields are typically inhomogeneous and often highly tangled due to large-scale plasma flows, turbulence, and instabilities. If the variations in the magnetic field occur on scales that are large compared to the gyro-radius of the plasma electrons, the electrons are primarily confined to gyro-centre trajectories along the field lines. Therefore, in-situ electron measurements help us map out the connectivity of the magnetic field in space plasmas. Gyro-centre drifts, wave-particle interactions, trapping, and cross-field diffusion are processes related to field inhomogeneities and fluctuations; they have the potential to modify or even disrupt the transport of electrons along field lines. We introduce the basic principles of electron transport in tangled magnetic fields and review the creation of tangled fields through turbulence and instabilities as well as the modulation of parallel electron transport through kinetic instabilities. We then describe trapping and de-trapping effects in inhomogeneous magnetic fields, as well as electron diffusion and energisation across the magnetic field. The transport of electrons in tangled fields results from a complex interplay of plasma processes that occur on a broad range of scales. A combination of in-situ plasma measurements, remote-sensing plasma observations, and plasma theory and simulations is required to resolve this contemporary challenge to the fields of heliophysics and astrophysics.

2026-05-05T20:54:06Z 84 pages, 16 figures; accepted for publication in Space Science Reviews This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-026-01303-9 Daniel Verscharen Natasha Jeffrey Anton Artemyev Jesse T. Coburn Matthew W. Kunz Oreste Pezzi Mario Riquelme Ida Svenningsson Lynn B. Wilson 10.1007/s11214-026-01303-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23740v1 2026-05-22T15:14:30Z

Space faces significant sustainability issues including orbital congestion and debris accumulation. The continued growth of space operations, accelerated by advancements such as reusable launch systems, further intensifies these pressures. Current mitigation strategies, such as deorbiting spacecraft or transferring them to graveyard orbits, remain inherently linear. This "take-make-waste" approach is environmentally unsustainable and economically inefficient. On Earth, similar challenges have driven the development of the circular economy (CE), which aims to eliminate waste and pollution, circulate resources at their highest value, and decouple economic growth from finite resource consumption. While these objectives have been extensively studied across terrestrial sectors, their application to the space domain remains largely unexplored. In particular, the concept of a circular space economy (CSE) remains constrained by narratives centered on reuse, recycling, and in-orbit servicing, lacking a structured definition, consistent terminology, and a clearly defined, comprehensive scope. This lack complicates the systematic integration of circularity into mission design, policy frameworks, and space system architectures. After a detailed analysis of established CE definitions and CSE definition proposals, this work conceptualizes the CSE and introduces a structured definition for the first time. It analyzes Earth-space distinctions, clarifies the relationship between space sustainability and the CSE, establishes the 10R Space Framework to narrow, slow, and close resource loops, and distinguishes three operational environments: (I) the CE in space, (II) the CE of the terrestrial (space) sector, and (III) the CE of celestial bodies beyond Earth. Ultimately, this work enables a shared understanding and aims to strengthen the concept's recognition in the space sustainability debate.

2026-05-22T15:14:30Z Jonas Bahlmann Michael Saidani Enrico Stoll Andreas M. Hein http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22576v1 2026-05-21T14:51:34Z

Modern economies depend critically on satellite infrastructure, yet the aggregate economic consequences of extreme solar energetic particle (SEP) events have not been rigorously assessed. This study develops an integrated framework linking SEP hazard characterization, dynamic geomagnetic cutoff rigidity modeling, radiation dose transport, and fleet-wide failure probability estimation to macroeconomic impact analysis. Using extreme-value analysis of 160 SEP events over 27.4 years (1996-2025), failure probability is estimated for ~10,650 US operational satellites under orbital regime-dependent shielding assumptions. The assessment reveals that ~100 satellites (1.0%) are at Critical risk, concentrated in high-altitude low Earth orbit and highly elliptical orbit, while medium Earth orbit and geosynchronous orbit satellites fall in the Negligible class (P_fail < 10^-9) under the assumed radiation-hardened components and shielding. The expected capital loss across the ~$254B fleet totals ~$5.2B. Three failure scenarios, expanding from Critical satellites only (P_fail > 10^-2), to Critical and Elevated (P_fail > 10^-3), and to all satellites with non-negligible risk (P_fail > 10^-6), yield daily economic impacts of ~$70M, ~$270M, and ~$1.3B, respectively. Earth observation suffers up to 95.6% capacity loss in the worst case, while military services experience 16.1-20.4% disruption across scenarios. Results are first-order estimates: hardware failure counts are conservative because only total ionizing dose is modeled, and daily economic impacts represent upper bounds because operator response and recovery are not included.

2026-05-21T14:51:34Z 35 pages, 7 figures and 3 tables D. Bor E. J. Oughton R. S. Weigel R. Yang T. Clower M. J. Wiltberger R. Linares