https://arxiv.org/api/5h0KCDxwtuTgCaBT5JyVf0uYwEw 2026-06-23T06:12:32Z 5624 990 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01992v1 Whence Nonlocality? Removing spooky action at a distance from the de Broglie Bohm pilot-wave theory using a time-symmetric version of de Broglie double solution 2023-12-04T16:10:52Z In this work, we review and extend a version of the old attempt made by Louis de broglie for interpreting quantum mechanics in realistic terms, namely the double solution. In this theory quantum particles are localized waves, i.e, solitons, that are solutions of relativistic nonlinear field equations. The theory that we present here is the natural extension of this old work and relies on a strong time-symmetry requiring the presence of advanced and retarded waves converging on particles. Using this method, we are able to justify wave-particle duality and to explain the violations of Bell's inequalities. Moreover, the theory recovers the predictions of the pilot-wave theory of de Borglie and Bohm, often known as Bohmian mechanics. As a direct consequence, we reinterpret the nonlocal action at a distance presents in the pilot-wave theory. In the double solution developed here there is fundamentally no action at a distance but the theory requires a form of superdeterminism driven by time-symmetry. 2023-12-04T16:10:52Z Aurélien Drezet http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01865v1 A comprehensive survey of Schwarzschild's original papers: Schwarzschild's trick and Einstein's s(h)tick 2023-12-04T12:57:04Z This paper examines Schwarzschild's key contributions to general relativity through his two papers. It focuses on his method for developing exterior and interior solutions. The study emphasizes Schwarzschild's ingenious methods and the implications of his solutions. The paper delves into the exchange of letters between Schwarzschild and Einstein, highlighting the collaborative nature of their scientific interaction. Interestingly, despite presenting Schwarzschild's exact solutions to the Prussian Academy, Einstein exhibited a preference for his approximate methods in his 1916 review paper "The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity." Contrary to common belief, the paper reveals that in 1916, Einstein's preference for approximate solutions over Schwarzschild's exact exterior solution was not due to a singularity concern. This finding dissociates Einstein's 1916 methodology from his later preoccupation with singularities, which became prominent only during his subsequent focus on unified field theory. Thus, the research posits that factors other than singularities influenced Einstein's decision to stick with approximate methods in 1916. 2023-12-04T12:57:04Z Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13668v2 The recurrent nova T CrB had prior eruptions observed near December 1787 and October 1217 AD 2023-12-03T17:35:50Z The famous recurrent nova (RN) T Coronae Borealis (T CrB) has had observed eruptions peaking at a visual magnitude of 2.0 in the years 1866 and 1946, while a third eruption is now expected for the year 2024.4+-0.3. Each RN has very similar light curves of eruptions that come with a fairly even-spacing in time, for which T CrB has a recurrence timescale near 80 years. So it is reasonable to look backwards in time for prior eruptions, around 1786, and so on back. I have investigated two long-lost suggestions that T CrB was seen in eruption in the years 1217 and 1787. (1) In a catalog published in 1789, the Reverend Francis Wollaston reports an astrometric position for a star that is exactly on top of T CrB. From his letters, these observations were made on at least four occassions with both a large and small telescope, within a few days before 1787 December 28. Wollaston's limiting magnitude for his astrometry is near 7.8 mag, so T CrB would have to have been in eruption. With other transients strongly rejected, the only way that Wollaston could get the coordinates was to have measured the coordinates of T CrB itself during an eruption. (2) The 1217 event has an eyewitness report written by Abbott Burchard of Upsberg as a fast-rising stellar point-source ("stella") in Corona Borealis that "shone with great light", lasted for "many days", and was ascribed as being a "wonderful sign". This event cannot be a report of a comet, because Burchard used the term for a star ("stella") and not for a comet, and because Burchard had the omen being very positive, with such being impossible for comets that are universally the worst of omens. The reported event is just as expected for a prior eruption of T CrB, and all other possibilities are strongly rejected, so the case for the 1217 eruption of T CrB is strong. 2023-08-25T20:52:30Z Journal for the History of Astronomy, 2023, vol. 54, pp. 436-455 Bradley E. Schaefer Louisiana State University http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00672v1 What Makes A Discovery 2023-12-01T15:52:55Z In this contribution to the proceedings of the 182nd Nobel Symposium, I reflect on the concept of "discovery" as it is used by physicists and astronomers. In particular, I comment on how the scientific community distinguishes discoveries from propositions that are supported only by lesser forms of evidence, emphasizing the social nature of this process and remarking on the subjective factors that go into making such judgements. I advocate for an approach that is intentionally Bayesian in nature, in which individuals are encouraged to evaluate and publicly state their priors and to update them systematically. I close by applying these practices to the case example of the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess. 2023-12-01T15:52:55Z 6 pages Dan Hooper http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18410v1 Richard Feynman's talent for finding things out 2023-11-30T09:59:55Z This article is a summary of a talk about Richard Feynman, given at a conference Polymaths across the Eras organized in November 2023 by the St Cross Centre for the History and Philosophy of Physics (HAPP) in Oxford. It describes Feynman as an unconventional polymath, primarily concerned with his own understanding of nature, having little regard for previous authorities. His curiosity, respect for experiment, ability to calculate and notable ingenuity led to important developments in quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, and strong interactions. In particle physics, Feynman diagrams have been a mainstay of calculation for the last 75 years. His relish for the spoken word led to renown as an educator and raconteur. His perceptions were influential in a wide range of other scientific fields, including weak interactions, gravity, superconductivity, biology, nanotechnology, algorithmic computation and quantum computers. In all of this, he held to the idea that nature has an intrinsic simplicity and beauty that permit us to find things out, if only we will try hard enough. 2023-11-30T09:59:55Z 6 pages David Broadhurst http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16371v3 The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach 2023-11-29T22:33:10Z I flesh out the sense in which the informational approach to interpreting quantum mechanics, as defended by Pitowsky and Bub and lately by a number of other authors, is (neo-)Bohrian. I argue that on this approach, quantum mechanics represents what Bohr called a ``natural generalisation of the ordinary causal description'' in the sense that the idea (which philosophers of science like Stein have argued for on the grounds of practical and epistemic necessity) that understanding a theory as a theory of physics requires that one be able to ``schematise the observer'' within it is elevated in quantum mechanics to the level of a postulate in the sense that interpreting the outcome of a measurement interaction, as providing us with information about the world, requires as a matter of principle, the specification of a schematic representation of an observer in the form of a `Boolean frame' -- the Boolean algebra representing the yes-or-no questions associated with a given observable representative of a given experimental context. I argue that the approach's central concern is with the methodological question of how to assign physical properties to what one takes to be a system in a given experimental context, rather than the metaphysical question of what a given state vector represents independently of any context, and I show how the quantum generalisation of the concept of an open system may be used to assuage Einstein's complaint that the orthodox approach to quantum mechanics runs afoul of the supposedly fundamental methodological requirement to the effect that one must always be able, according to Einstein, to treat spatially separated systems as isolated from one another. 2023-08-31T00:19:04Z This paper has been published in Entropy 2023, 25(10), 1410. Because Entropy has an editorial policy against footnotes, this version, which uses footnotes but is otherwise identical (including page numbers) to the published version, may be more readable. Please use the publication details just mentioned when citing this paper Michael E. Cuffaro 10.3390/e25101410 http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08538v4 Highlighting relations between Wave-particle duality, Uncertainty principle, Phase space and Microstates 2023-11-29T14:58:34Z Wave-particle duality is often considered as the modern answer to the problem of the nature of light after more than 2000 years of questioning. It is also the answer given by quantum physics concerning the nature of matter particles and any other radiations. The main objective of this work is to analyze the relations that are existing between this concept of wave-particle duality, the uncertainty principle and the concepts of phase space and microstates considered in statistical mechanics. It is mainly highlighted that while the concepts of phase space and microstates were already introduced in classical physics before the discovery of the wave-particle duality, a correct understanding of them cannot be achieved without the use of the concept of quantum phase space and phase space representation of quantum mechanics which are directly related to the uncertainty principle. The possibility of using these concepts of quantum phase space and phase space representations of quantum mechanics to help in a deeper description of the wave-particle duality and in the study of some current issues related to foundational problems of quantum mechanics like quantum decoherence and the measurement problem is also discussed. 2022-05-17T04:20:16Z 25 pages Ravo Tokiniaina Ranaivoson Voriraza Séraphin Hejesoa Raoelina Andriambololona Nirina Gilbert Rasolofoson Hanitriarivo Rakotoson Jacqueline Rabesahala Raoelina Andriambololona Lala Rarivomanantsoa Naivo Rabesiranana http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17966v1 Dating of a Latin astrolabe 2023-11-29T12:24:44Z We have determined the most probable date for the catalog of 34 stars that was used in the construction of a Latin astrolabe originally owned by the Dominican preacher friars and presently at Musée des Arts précieux Paul-Dupuy (Toulouse, France). To this end we digitized a photograph of the rete and the rule of the astrolabe, computed the equatorial coordinates of the ends of the 34 star pointers of the rete, and produced a list of 113 reference stars taken from several lists of stars on astrolabes. We then compared the coordinates of the ends of the pointers and those of the reference stars for dates between 1400 and 1700. The most probable date for this astrolabe is 1550. 2023-11-29T12:24:44Z Translation of a technical report (in French) for the Musée des Arts précieux Paul-Dupuy (Toulouse, France) Emmanuel Davoust http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17427v1 Anticipations and Discoveries of the Heavy Hydrogen Isotopes, 1913-1939 2023-11-29T08:07:40Z Just as the chemical elements from hydrogen (Z = 1) to oganesson (Z = 118) once were discovered, so were the numerous isotopes. The histories of how the isotopes were discovered are less well known, but in a few cases they are as interesting and instructive as those of the elements figuring in the periodic table. Following an overview of criteria usually associated with the concept of discovery in general, this paper examines in detail the historical developments that led to the discoveries of deuterium and tritium and also, as a by-product, the helium-3 isotope. It also includes a brief section on the neutron, which in the 1920s, when it was still a hypothetical particle, was sometimes discussed together with the mass-2 and mass-3 hydrogen isotopes. The paper concludes with a discussion of priority questions relating to suggestions of the two heavy isotopes as well as to their actual discoveries. 2023-11-29T08:07:40Z 21 pages, 3 figures Helge Kragh http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16730v1 A discussion of the cross section $\barν_e+p\to e^+ + n$ 2023-11-28T12:23:54Z We discuss the interaction cross section $\barν_e-p$ due to charged currents, of major importance for neutrino detection. We present the history of its understanding and highlight the aspects necessary for its precise evaluation. We examine the three most recent determinations and, on the basis of the most recent one, tabulate its updated values and assess its uncertainty. 2023-11-28T12:23:54Z 8 pages, 1 figure. Presented at MAYORANA Workshop, July 2023, Modica (Italy) Il Nuovo Cimento 47 C (2024) 379 Giulia Ricciardi Natascia Vignaroli Francesco Vissani 10.1393/ncc/i2024-24379-1 http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15470v1 An axiomatic limitation on the deterministic scope required for superdeterminism and its consequentially greater likelihood 2023-11-27T00:55:45Z By positing a universe where all events are determined by initial conditions, superdeterminism as conceded by Bell frames correlations observed in quantum measurements as the consequence of an inherently predetermined cosmic order that shapes even our experimental choices. I use an axiomatic formulation of superdeterminism to demonstrate that Bell overstated the scope of determinism required. Assuming only the existence of a universe containing observers, I show that determinism in just the observer scope is sufficient. I then discuss how this sufficiency increases the theory's plausibility and suggest a path to its integration with results from other disciplines. 2023-11-27T00:55:45Z 4 pages, no figures Cameron Shackell http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00598v2 A mathematical construction of the 260 day mesoamerican calendar based on archaeoastronomical alignments 2023-11-23T07:21:58Z Ancient mesoamerican cultures built a short ritual 260 day calendar and used it for daily routinary life. Using simple arithmetic calculations it is first shown that by forcing the introduction of the the fundamental number 13 to calculate days in a calendar, a 364 day count can be built and from this, the short mesoamerican calendar of 260 days is constructed. It is also shown that the basic mesoamerican relation between the full solar 365 day calendar and the short one of 260 days given by: 365 x 52 = 260 x 73 is Kepler's third law of orbital motion between Earth's period of time about the Sun and an imaginary synodic orbit with a 260 day period. Based on this basic mesoamerican relation and a general definition of an archaeoastronomical alignment, a full mathematical definition of a short calendar count is made. For particular cases, approximate calendar counts of 364 and 360 days are obtained with fundamental numbers 13 and 18 associated to each one respectively. The extra days required for this approximate calendar counts are a given solstice day for the former, and 4 plus 1 (the given solstice day) for the latter, generating the 5 nemontemi days used by ancient mesoamerican cultures. Motivated by an extended mesoamerican relation, two types of archaeoastronomical alignments are defined and their consequences are investigated. These Type-A and Type-B archaeoastronomical alignments motivate the introduction of extended fundamental or monad fractions that partition the approximate and short counts. 2023-09-01T17:35:02Z 12 pages, 8 figures Sergio Mendoza http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10192v2 Is Bohr's Correspondence Principle just Hankel's Principle of Permanence? 2023-11-22T13:01:41Z No, but the paper argues that Bohr understood his correspondence principle, or at least an aspect of that principle expressed by the notion of rational generalization, as grounded in Hankel's principle of permanence, adapted to new historical and theoretical contexts. This is shown to illuminate some otherwise obscure aspects of Bohr's approach to quantum theory, as well as a seemingly strange criticism against this approach, due to Feyerabend and Bohm. 2023-10-16T08:54:57Z 27 pages Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2024 Iulian D. Toader 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.12.003 http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12913v1 Marietta Blau and the photographic method of particle detection 2023-11-21T17:35:39Z Marietta Blau was a Vienna born nuclear physicist who eventually became the leading expert in the photographic detection of ionizing particles. She studied physics at the University of Vienna, graduated in 1919. As of 1924, she adapted the technique of photography for the detection of nuclear particles at the Vienna Institute for Radium Research. When after years of painstaking methodical development Blau succeeded in registering tracks of particles, she and her collaborator Hertha Wambacher further refined the technique and by its use discovered the star-shaped tracks of reaction fragments from the interaction of cosmic-ray particles in photographic emulsions, the disintegration stars, in 1937. Due to her Jewish descent, Blau emigrated in 1938, first to Mexico, later to the U.S. where she had access to scientific research again in 1948. At Brookhaven National Laboratory and Miami University she applied the photographic method to reactions induced by high-energy particles from accelerating machines rather than cosmic rays. When she returned to Vienna in 1960, she supervised the evaluation of photographic plates from CERN experiments. 2023-11-21T17:35:39Z 24 pages, 10 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:physics/0110028 by other authors Brigitte Strohmaier University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics - Nuclear Physics, Vienna, Austria http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12297v2 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics and the End of Mechanistic Materialism 2023-11-17T22:36:16Z The ideas and results that are in the background of the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics had an immense impact on our understanding of reality. Therefore, it is crucial that these implications reach also the general public, not only the scientists in the related fields of quantum mechanics. The purpose of this review is to attempt to elucidate these revolutionary changes in our worldview that were eventually acknowledged also by the Nobel's committee, and to do it with very few references to mathematical details (which could be even ignored without undermining the take-away essence of the text). We first look into the foundational disputes between Einstein and Bohr about the nature of quantum mechanics, which culminated in the so-called EPR paradox -- the main impetus for all the research that would ensue in this context. Next, we try to explain the statement of the famous Bell's theorem -- the theorem that relocated the Einstain-Bohr discussions from the realm of philosophy and metaphysics to hard-core physics verifiable by experiments (we also give a brief derivation of the theorem's proof). Then we overview the experimental work of the last year's laureates, that had the final say about who was right in the debate. The outcome of these experiments forced us to profoundly revise our understanding of the universe. Finally, we discuss in more detail the implications of such outcomes, and what are the possible ways that our worldviews can be modified to account for the experimental facts. As we will see, the standard mechanist picture of the universe is no longer a viable option, and can be never again. Nowadays, we know this with certainty unusual for physics, that only a strict mathematical theorem could provide. 2023-08-11T14:53:10Z Revised version after peer review. The paper was additionally streamlined for readers lacking a background in quantum mechanics (derivations separated into appendices; comments of a mathematical nature moved to footnotes). Also, the discussion of the philosophical implications of Bell's theorem is somewhat extended. To be published in Phlogiston, 31 (2023) Igor Salom