https://arxiv.org/api/4eIc6qe9IMJ4paKevj0EW/Rmxnw 2026-06-22T01:53:05Z 5621 960 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04085v1 2024-01-08T18:43:40Z

We introduce a transformation of the quantum phase $S'=S+\frac{\hbar}{2}\logρ$, which converts the deterministic equations of quantum mechanics into the Lagrangian reference frame of stochastic particles. We show that the quantum potential can be removed from the transformed quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equations if they are solved as stochastic Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. The system of equations provide a local description of quantum mechanics, which is enabled by the inherently retrocausal nature of stochastic Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. We also investigate the stochastic transformation of the classical system, where is it shown that quantum mechanics with the quantum potential reduced by a factor of $\frac{1}{2}$ has a classical representation, which may have interesting implications. Finally, we discuss the notion of a subsystem correspondence principle, which constrains the ontology of the total quantum system.

2024-01-08T18:43:40Z Adam Brownstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01793v3 2024-01-08T09:00:35Z

It was proposed that the tensor product structure of the Hilbert space is uniquely determined by the Hamiltonian's spectrum, for most finite-dimensional cases satisfying certain conditions. I show that any such method would lead to infinitely many tensor product structures. The dimension of the space of solutions grows exponentially with the number of qudits. In addition, even if the result were unique, such a Hamiltonian would not entangle subsystems. These results affect the proposals to recover the 3d space from the Hamiltonian.

2024-01-03T15:49:52Z 3 pages, comments welcome! Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19657v1 2024-01-07T22:38:27Z

The atomic bomb uses fission of heavy elements to produce a large amount of energy. It was designed and deployed during World War II by the United States military. The first test of an atomic bomb occurred in July of 1945 in New Mexico and was given the name Trinity; this test was not declassified until 1949. In that year Geoffrey Ingram Taylor released two papers, detailing his process in calculating the energy yield of the atomic bomb from pictures of the Trinity explosion alone. Many scientists made similar calculations concurrently, though Taylor is often accredited with them. Since then many scientists have also attempted a to calculate a yield through various methods. This paper walks through these methods with a focus on Taylor's method -- based on first principles -- as well as redoing the calculations that he performed with modern tools. In this paper we make use of the state-of-the-art computer vision tools to find a more precise measurement of the blast radius, as well as using curve fitting and numerical integration methods. With more precise measurements we are able to follow in Taylor's footstep towards a more accurate approximation.

2024-01-07T22:38:27Z 9 pages, 7 figures, submitted to Data Centric Engineering on 08/27/2023 and currently under review Elizabeth Mone College of Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia Pranay Seshadri College of Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10074v2 2024-01-07T02:58:31Z

Canonically, `classic' tests of general relativity (GR) include perihelion precession, the bending of light around stars, and gravitational redshift; `modern' tests have to do with, inter alia, relativistic time delay, equivalence principle tests, gravitational lensing, strong field gravity, and gravitational waves. The orthodoxy is that both classic and modern tests of GR afford experimental confirmation of that theory in particular. In this article, we question this orthodoxy, by showing there are classes of both relativistic theories (with spatiotemporal geometrical properties different from those of GR) and non-relativistic theories (in which the lightcones of a relativistic spacetime are `widened') which would also pass such tests. Thus, (a) issues of underdetermination in the context of GR loom much larger than one might have thought, and (b) given this, one has to think more carefully about what exactly such tests in fact are testing.

2023-07-19T15:47:35Z This is a revised version of the previous draft European Journal for Philosophy of Science 14, 57 (2024) William J. Wolf Marco Sanchioni James Read 10.1007/s13194-024-00617-1 http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03143v1 2024-01-06T07:25:56Z

Research of cosmic rays at the Physical Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences resulted in the construction of the JINR Synchrophasotron. For this purpose the Electrophysical Laboratory of the USSR Academy of Sciences was founded in 1953, which became part of JINR in 1956 as the High Energy Laboratory. The initial milestones to develop experiments at the Laboratory on the Synchrophasotron are presented. Leaders and key participants in the experiments are highlighted, as well as the lessons and results relevant today.

2024-01-06T07:25:56Z To be published in Proceedings of https://indico.jinr.ru/event/3694/ (PEPAN/EChAYa) Nuclei. Phys. Part. Nuclei 55, 950-961 (2024) P. I. Zarubin A. A. Zaitsev 10.1134/S1063779624700643 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02283v2 2024-01-04T12:53:48Z

I apply Dawid's Meta-Empirical Assessment (MEA) methodology to the theory of cosmological inflation. I argue that applying this methodology does not currently offer a compelling case for ascribing non-empirical confirmation to cosmological inflation. In particular, I argue that despite displaying strong instances of Unexpected Explanatory Coherence (UEA), it is premature to evaluate the theory on the basis of the No Alternatives Argument (NAA). More significantly though, I argue that the theory of cosmological inflation fails to sustain a convincing Meta-Inductive Argument (MIA) because the empirical evidence and theoretical successes that it seeks to draw meta-empirical support from do not warrant a meta-inductive inference to inflation. I conclude by assessing how future developments could pave the way towards crafting a more compelling case for the non-empirical confirmation of cosmological inflation.

2023-09-05T14:43:28Z Accepted in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 103 (2024) 146-158 William J. Wolf 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.12.006 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16266v2 2024-01-04T12:47:25Z

The paper investigates the historical and contemporary pursuit-worthiness of cosmic inflation-the rationale for working on it (rather than necessarily the evidential support for claims to its approximate truth): what reasons existed, and exist, that warrant inflation's status as the mainstream paradigm studied, explored, and further developed by the majority of the cosmology community? We'll show that inflation exemplifies various salient theory virtues: explanatory depth, unifying/integrative power, fertility and positive heuristics, the promotion of understanding, and the prospect (and passing) of novel benchmark tests. This, we'll argue, constitutes inflation's auspicious promise. It marks inflation as preferable over both the inflation-less Hot Big Bang Model, as well as rivals to inflation: inflation, we maintain, rightly deserved, and continues to deserve, the concerted research efforts it has enjoyed.

2023-09-28T09:01:24Z Forthcoming in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Updated to fix minor typos William J. Wolf Patrick M. Duerr http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02464v1 2024-01-04T11:47:28Z

The first modern planetarium was presented in 1923 in Jena, Germany. Very soon in the subsequent years, planetariums were installed in other parts of Europe as well as in America. France, however, got its first planetarium only in 1937, for the World Exhibition organized in Paris. The team that took care of that planetarium was headed by a female amateur astronomer named Reysa Bernson. This choice might seem surprising, but it was not made at random, thanks to her never-ending astronomical activities at that time. This paper aims to bring back memories of this very active amateur astronomer of the 1920s and 1930s, and show the many ways in which astronomy was disseminated a century ago.

2024-01-04T11:47:28Z published in JAHH, see complements on https://hdl.handle.net/2268/310591 JAHH, vol 26(4), pages 816-832 (2023) Yael Naze Uliege http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14959v2 2024-01-04T01:56:06Z

In commemoration of the fifth anniversary since Nino Boccara's departure, this article offers some personal recollections and provides insight into his life and accomplishments. Detailed bibliography of his works is included together with commentary highlighting his major achievements.

2023-12-13T16:07:52Z 16 pages, 2 figures with 6 photos Journal of Cellular Automata, 17(5-6):461-477, 2023 Henryk Fukś http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05667v4 2024-01-02T16:40:17Z

Maxwell defined a true or total current in a way not widely used today. He said "... true electric current ... is not the same thing as the current of conduction but that the time-variation of the electric displacement must be taken into account in estimating the total movement of electricity". We show that true or total current is a universal property of electrodynamics independent of properties of matter. We use mathematics without a dielectric constant. The resulting Maxwell Current Law is a generalization of the Kirchhoff Law of Current used in circuit analysis, that also includes displacement current. The generalization is not a long-time low frequency approximation in contrast to traditional presentation of Kirchhoff's Law. The Maxwell Current Law does not require currents to be in circuits. It has been applied to three dimensional systems like the signaling system of nerve and muscle fibers. The Maxwell Current Law clarifies the flow of electrons, protons, and ions in mitochondria that generate ATP, the molecule that stores chemical energy throughout life. The currents are globally coupled because mitochondria are short. Focusing on Maxwell current reinterprets the classical chemiosmotic hypothesis of ATP production. The conduction current of protons in mitochondria is driven by the protonmotive force including its component electrical potential, just as in the classical chemiosmotic hypothesis. The electrical potential is now the electrical potential as defined in physical sciences by Maxwell partial differential equations. The conduction current is now just a part of the true current analyzed by Maxwell. Details of accumulation of charges do not have to be considered in analysis of true current because true current does not accumulate. It is true total current that provides the energy that generates the ATP, not just the protonmotive force.

2023-08-30T20:14:35Z Version 4 with typos corrected and further discussion of stray capacitances and chemiosmotic hypothesis Robert S. Eisenberg http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00177v1 2023-12-30T09:04:30Z

In this article, I will explore the nature of interference in translation, especially in technical and scientific texts, using a descriptivist approach. I will have a brief overview of the historical excursion of interference in technical and scientific translation. My aim is to explain this phenomenon and its causes with all its paradoxes, instead of simply condemning it as an example of supposedly bad translation. Thus, I will focus on its status in the bibliography of translation, on the motives for and consequences of interference in specialized translation, as well as on the nature of the arguments given for and against this phenomenon. Therefore the relationship between different societies has always been possible with the act of translation. When civilizations are examined throughout history, it is seen that the dissemination of knowledge among different societies has been achieved by translation. These societies have often become aware of the advancements in technology and science by means of translation. Therefore; translation becomes very significant in technical contact between societies and humans. Since the translation of technical texts is the preliminary scope of this thesis, it will be beneficial to have a brief look at the history of technical translation in the world.

2023-12-30T09:04:30Z Mohammad Ibrahim Qani http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00152v1 2023-12-30T06:39:20Z

The assumption that the system Hamiltonian for entangled states is additive is widely used in orthodox quantum no-signalling arguments. It is shown that additivity implies a contradiction with the assumption that the system being studied is entangled.

2023-12-30T06:39:20Z Kent A. Peacock http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.17693v1 2023-12-29T17:19:03Z

Thomas S. Kuhn interprets the development of the (natural) sciences as a specific dynamical process. Periods of piecemeal growth of knowledge based on widely accepted paradigms are interrupted by bursts of revolutionary changes which lead to new paradigms incommensurate with the earlier ones. This process is briefly illustrated by recalling the changes to classical physics brought about by Einstein's theory of relativity on the one hand, and by quantum theory on the other. Both theories represent fundamental paradigms of contemporary physics. They appear unshakable to the working physicist but according to Kuhn their paradigmatic status is of a temporary nature only. Does Kuhn's framework help us to identify potential future revolutions?

2023-12-29T17:19:03Z 8 pages, 3 figures J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2877 (2024) 012071 Stefan Weigert 10.1088/1742-6596/2877/1/012071 http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07552v4 2023-12-26T19:18:30Z

One of main sources of uncertainty in modern cosmology is the present rate of the universe's expansion, H0, called the Hubble constant. Once again, different observational techniques bring about different results, causing new 'Hubble tension'. In the present work, we review the historical roots of the Hubble constant from the beginning of the twentieth century, when modern cosmology originated, to the present. We develop the arguments that gave rise to the importance of measuring the expansion of the Universe and its discovery, and we describe the different pioneering works attempting to measure it. There has been a long dispute on this matter, even in the present epoch, which is marked by high-tech instrumentation and, therefore, in smaller uncertainties in the relevant parameters. It is, again, currently necessary to conduct a careful and critical revision of the different methods before one invokes new physics to solve the so-called Hubble tension.

2023-11-13T18:42:03Z 52 pages, 14 figures, 3 tables. We corrected typos and references Universe 2023, 9, 501 Jorge L. Cervantes-Cota Salvador Galindo-Uribarri George F. Smoot 10.3390/universe9120501 http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16229v1 2023-12-24T19:43:59Z

The goal of this article is to give an overview of the current limitations and epistemological barriers in Science and Scientific Philosophy from a very general point of view. We first list and define the types of knowledge nous, doxa and episteme, and the Subject-Observer and Object(s) of study, to proceed showing the different types of barriers that difficult the knowledge of the physical world: limitations in the language, in the logic of the Subject-Observer. Later, we discriminate between technological barriers, (temporary) limits and absolute epistemic barriers. The last type of limits are presented and discussed in some detail: the quantum of action, Planck's scale and quantum gravity (showing the importance of the trans-Planckian scale for structure formation), the cosmological horizon (a limit to the present observable Universe) and the event horizons (disconnecting the inside of some spacetimes from the rest of the Universe). We argue that physical problems in which absolute barriers seem to determine the end of the attainable knowledge, are in fact amenable to be studied, at least indirectly.

2023-12-24T19:43:59Z 19 pp. 4 figures. Accepted for publication in Cosmos and History J. E. Horvath R. R. Fernandes T. P. Idiart