https://arxiv.org/api/zHjDoAr2AQccpLURMP/p2bcVr8k 2026-06-22T00:42:29Z 5621 945 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15518v1 2024-01-27T22:35:29Z

Antonie (Anton) Pannekoek (1873-1960) is remembered as one of the initiators of the field of stellar atmospheres. A second part of his research concerned Galactic astronomy. He was convinced that the sidereal system was built up of clouds of stars in a smooth, low-density stratum. In addition there were dark clouds together with streaks with little or no extinction in between. Pannekoek looked at bright star clouds and estimated their distance from their contribution to star counts. He found values of tens of kpc, which would mean their distribution was similar in extent to that of Shapleys globular cluster system. Later he had to reduce his distance by a factor over two, and later still retract the method. He developed a rigorous method of estimating distances of dark clouds from modeling star counts off and on the cloud, preceding Wolf's quick and dirty method. He should have received more credit for this. He started isophotal maps of the northern and southern Milky Way, first from visual observations, later from photographic surface photometry using out-of-focus exposures. I compare Pannekoeks maps with detailed photographic surface photometry of the south by the group in Bochum and to the almost all-sky mapping by the Pioneer 10 spacecraft, free of zodiacal light, from beyond the asteroid belt. This shows Panneloeks maps to be surprisingly accurate. The legacy of Pannekoek in the area of Galactic research consists of his mapping of the structure of the nearby part of the Galaxy, the distances of dark clouds, and isophotal maps of the Milky Way. His other contributions turned out inconclusive or wrong as a result of his conviction, resulting from his many years of observing and mapping the Milky Way, that the nearby distribution is characterized primarily by more or less isolated clouds of stars and by dust restricted to isolated dark clouds and streaks.

2024-01-27T22:35:29Z 92 pages, 32 figures, 4 tables. This paper has been accepted for publication in the March issue by the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. For a version with high-resolution figures please go to the my homepage, where a link will be provided Pieter C. van der Kruit http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15474v1 2024-01-27T18:12:23Z

I present aspects of causal set theory (a research programme in quantum gravity) as being en route to achieving a reduction of Lorentzian geometry to causal sets. I take reduction in philosophers' sense; and I argue that the prospects are good for there being a reduction of the type envisaged by Nagel. (I also discuss the prospects for the stronger functionalist variant of Nagelian reduction, that was formulated by Lewis.) One main theme will be causal set theory's use of a physical scale (viz. the Planck scale) to formulate how it recovers a Lorentzian manifold. This use illustrates various philosophical topics relevant to reduction, such as limiting relations between theories, and the role of analogy. I also emphasise causal set theory's probabilistic method, viz. Poisson sprinkling: which is used both for formulating the reduction and for exploring its prospects.

2024-01-27T18:12:23Z 31 pages, no Figures. Forthcoming in 'Time and Timelessness in Fundamental Physics and Cosmology', edited by S. De Bianchi, M. Forgione and L. Marongiu; Springer Jeremy Butterfield http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10022v4 2024-01-27T01:57:44Z

This paper is concerned with the causally symmetric version of the familiar de Broglie-Bohm interpretation, this version allowing the spacelike nonlocality and the configuration space ontology of the original model to be avoided via the addition of retrocausality. Two different features of this alternative formulation are considered here. With regard to probabilities, it is shown that the model provides a derivation of the Born rule identical to that in Bohm's original formulation. This derivation holds just as well for a many-particle, entangled state as for a single particle. With regard to "certainties", the description of a particles spin is examined within the model and it is seen that a statistical description is no longer necessary once final boundary conditions are specified in addition to the usual initial state, with the particle then possessing a definite (but hidden) value for every spin component at intermediate times. These values are consistent with being the components of a single, underlying spin vector. The case of a two-particle entangled spin state is also examined and it is found that, due to the retrocausal aspect, each particle possesses its own definite spin during the entanglement, independent of the other particle. In formulating this picture, it is demonstrated how such a realistic model can preserve Lorentz invariance in the face of Bell's theorem and avoid the need for a preferred reference frame.

2021-12-18T22:59:14Z Foundations of Physics, Vol. 52, Article 75 (2022) Roderick Sutherland 10.1007/s10701-022-00573-x http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13336v1 2024-01-24T10:01:14Z

Our representation of the Universe is built with sequences of symbols, numbers, operators, rules and undecidable propositions defining our mathematical truths, represented either by classical, quantum and probabilistic Turing Machines containing intrinsic randomness. Each representation is at all effects a physical subset of the Universe, a metastructure of events in space and time, which actively participate to the evolution of the Universe as we are internal observers. The evolution is a deterministic sequence of local events, quantum measurements, originated from the local wavefunction collapse of the complementary set of the observers that generate the local events in the Universe. With these assumptions, the Universe and its evolution are described in terms of a semantically closed structure without a global object-environment loss of decoherence as a von Neumann's universal constructor with a semantical abstract whose structure cannot be decided deterministically a-priori from an internal observer. In a semantically closed structure the realization of a specific event writing the semantical abstract of the constructor is a problem that finds a "which way" for the evolution of the Universe in terms of a choice of the constructor's state in a metastructure, the many-world Everett scenario from the specific result of a quantum measurement, a classical Gödel undecidable proposition for an internal observer, exposing the limits of our description and possible simulation of the Universe.

2024-01-24T10:01:14Z 27 pages Entropy 2024 Dec 9;26(12):1068 Fabrizio Tamburini Ignazio Licata 10.3390/e26121068 http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13188v1 2024-01-24T02:17:29Z

We describe the results in the trigonometry of tetrahedra obtained by Joseph Wolstenholme in the last few years of his life. 'The late Professor Wolstenholme, M.A., Sc.D., shortly before his death, handed to me a scrap of paper, on which he had hastily scratched the following equation in tetrahedra, saying he had proved it ...' (Richardson, 1897).

2024-01-24T02:17:29Z Daniil Rudenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10350v1 2024-01-18T19:32:25Z

Did the papacy tacitly permit the circulation of an explicitly Copernican book in 1660? One scholar has recently argued that it did. A close analysis of a unique illustration from that book, Andreas Cellarius's atlas Harmonia Macrocosmica, illuminates this argument. This is because the illustration, a diagram showing the relative sizes of the sun, moon, planets, and stars, was among the material reviewed (at the request of the book's publisher) by the Holy Office prior to the book's publication and was pro-Copernican.

2024-01-18T19:32:25Z 15 pages, 5 figures Christopher M. Graney http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06051v2 2024-01-16T12:50:56Z

Supersymmetry is a theme with many facets that has dominated much of high energy physics over the past decades. In this contribution I present a very personal perspective on these developments, which has also been shaped in an important way by my interactions with Julius Wess and Bruno Zumino.

2023-11-10T13:26:25Z Invited contribution to the second edition of the book The Supersymmetric World, ed. by M. Shifman and G. Kane, new version with minor corrections Hermann Nicolai http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07547v1 2024-01-15T09:21:17Z

Quantum machine learning has received tremendous amounts of attention in the last ten years, and this trend is on the rise. Despite its developments being currently limited to either theoretical statements and formal proofs or small-scale noisy experiments and classical simulations, this field of quantum technologies has been consistently standing in the spotlight. Moreover, the locus of attention seems to have been skewed towards three central questions: "Can we beat classical computers?", "How?" and "When?". In this work, I argue that focus on quantum machine learning stems from a wide range of factors, some of which lie outside the discipline itself. Based on both recent and key publications on the subject as well as general audience sources, I give a brief overview of the core questions being raised in quantum machine learning and propose a socio-epistemologic interpretation of the motivations behind those and interplay between them.

2024-01-15T09:21:17Z Extended abstract related to the eponymous poster presented at Quantum Information Processing 2024 Richard A. Wolf http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03188v2 2024-01-13T20:47:33Z

We describe the picture of physical processes suggested by Edward Nelson's stochastic mechanics when generalized to quantum field theory regularized on a lattice, after an introductory review of his theory applied to the hydrogen atom. By performing numerical simulations of the relevant stochastic processes, we observe that Nelson's theory provides a means of generating typical field configurations for any given quantum state. In particular, an intuitive picture is given of the field ``beable'' -- to use a phrase of John Stewart Bell -- corresponding to the Fock vacuum, and an explanation is suggested for how particle-like features can be exhibited by excited states. We then argue that the picture looks qualitatively similar when generalized to interacting scalar field theory. Lastly, we compare the Nelsonian framework to various other proposed ontologies for QFT, and remark upon their relative merits in light of the effective field theory paradigm. Links to animations of the corresponding beables are provided throughout.

2023-07-06T17:58:47Z 24 pages, 7 figures Andrea Carosso 10.1007/s10701-024-00766-6 http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07046v1 2024-01-13T11:18:46Z

Sixty years ago Gell-Mann introduced, with a striking sense of caution, a new fundamental layer in the structure of matter. He christened the associated particles 'quarks', a name borrowed from the psychedelic flood of words of James Joyce's novel Finnegans Wake. Independently and simultaneously, Zweig arrived at similar ideas. We outline the circumstances that led to the introduction of quarks.

2024-01-13T11:18:46Z 1964: a new layer in the structure of matter Jos Engelen http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02643v5 2024-01-11T23:31:07Z

A restricted form of Landauer's Principle, independent of computational considerations, is shown to hold for thermal systems by reference to the joint entropy associated with conjugate observables. It is shown that the source of the compensating entropy for irreversible physical processes is due to the ontological uncertainty attending values of such mutually incompatible observables, rather than due to epistemic uncertainty as traditionally assumed in the information-theoretic approach. In particular, it is explicitly shown that erasure of logical (epistemic) information via reset operations is not equivalent to erasure of thermodynamic entropy, so that the traditional, information-theoretic form of Landauer's Principle is not supported by the physics. A further implication of the analysis is that, in principle, there can be no Maxwell's Demon in the real world.

2023-07-05T20:23:04Z Final accepted version; published in Mathematics Mathematics 2024, 12(2), 206; 08 Jan 2024 R. E. Kastner Andreas Schlatter 10.3390/math12020206 http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06292v1 2024-01-11T23:16:14Z

Many scientists view science as value-free, despite the fact that both epistemic and non-epistemic values structure scientific inquiry. Current ethics training usually focuses on transmitting knowledge about high-level ethical concepts or rules and is widely regarded as ineffective. We argue that ethics training will be more effective at improving ethical decision making if it focuses on connecting values to science. We pull from philosophy and psychology to define ethical decision making using the Four Component Model. This model states that in order to make an ethical decision someone must consider four components: moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, moral motivation, and moral implementation. We formed a moderated fellowship of fourteen science faculty from different disciplines who met for ten sessions over the course of a year, where they discussed the values embedded in different scientific norms. We then conducted interviews before and after the year-long fellowship that involved guided reflection of scenarios where there was some kind of ethical misconduct where the scientific practice required value judgements (e.g using unpublished data in their own work). We looked at how the fellowship affected the scientists' ability to recognize ethical dimensions regarding the scenarios. We found that this fellowship improved moral sensitivity, but their moral reasoning does not improve. We outlined our approach on how to look at scientists' ethical decision making and made recommendations on how to improve our approach. This work can inform future ethical training to align better with what scientists value and introduce useful concepts from philosophy and psychology to education research in physics.

2024-01-11T23:16:14Z Tyler Garcia Bill Bridges Caitlin Solis Caleb Linville Wyatt Jones Scott Tanona Jonathan Herington James T. Laverty http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04711v1 2024-01-09T18:32:59Z

I describe aspects of my life in physics: the name I publish under, great physicists I have known, how I got into quantum foundations, what role I've played in it. My form is autobiographical, but my personal experience may illustrate what it was like being a physicist over the past 60 years. I offer some offbeat ways of thinking about some orthodox physics.

2024-01-09T18:32:59Z 17 pages, no figures N. David Mermin http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19658v1 2024-01-09T10:04:51Z

This paper addresses the central question of what a coherent concept of probability might look like that would do justice to both classical probability theory, axiomatized by Kolmogorov, and quantum theory. At a time when quanta are receiving increased and expanded attention -- think, for example, of the advances in quantum computers or the promises associated with this new technology (National Academies of Sciences: Engineering, and Medicine, 2019) -- an adequate interpretation of probability, which is no less important, should be given due attention, particularly with regard to quantum theory.

2024-01-09T10:04:51Z in German language Christian Hugo Hoffmann http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04091v1 2024-01-08T18:51:38Z

The issue of non-locality in quantum mechanics can potentially be resolved by considering relativistically covariant diffusion in four-dimensional spacetime. Stochastic particles described by the Klein-Gordon equation are shown to undergo a classical diffusion process in spacetime coordinates, which is seen by transforming the quantum Cauchy-momentum equations to a Lagrangian frame of reference. Since the quantum potential term is removed under this transformation, the equations for momentum propagation along particle trajectories assume a classical form. A local stochastic de Broglie-Bohm interpretation for the Klein-Gordon system can subsequently be derived. We also introduce the concept of momentum equivariance to replace the second-order Bohm-Newton equations of motion, which break down due to non-linear terms of the stochastic Lagrangian derivative.

2024-01-08T18:51:38Z Adam Brownstein