https://arxiv.org/api/WPHDCU5fvMYNvL52s4oXjuaw88A2026-06-21T23:33:43Z562193015http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16526v2On the Hole Argument and the physical interpretation of General Relativity2024-02-11T09:05:38ZEinstein presented the Hole Argument against General Covariance, understood as invariance with respect to a change of coordinates, as a consequence of his initial failure to obtain covariant equations that, in the weak static limit, contain Newton's law. Fortunately, about two years later, Einstein returned to General Covariance and found these famous equations of gravity. However, the rejection of his Hole Argument carries a totally different vision of space-time. Its substantivalism notion, which is an essential ingredient in Newtonian theory and also in his special theory of relativity, has to be replaced, following Descartes and Leibniz's relationalism, by a set of "point-coincidences."2023-12-27T11:15:31Z15 pages. Version accepted for publication in UniverseJaume de Harohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06848v1Everettian Branching in the World and of the World2024-02-10T00:34:57ZThis paper investigates the formation and propagation of wavefunction `branches' through the process of entanglement with the environment. While this process is a consequence of unitary dynamics, and hence significant to many if not all approaches to quantum theory, it plays a central role in many recent articulations of the Everett or `many worlds' interpretation. A highly idealized model of a locally interacting system and environment is described, and investigated in several situations in which branching occurs, including those involving Bell inequality violating correlations; we illustrate how any non-locality is compatible with the locality of the dynamics. Although branching is particularly important for many worlds quantum theory, we take a neutral stance here, simply tracing out the consequences of a unitary dynamics. The overall goals are to provide a simple concrete realization of the quantum physics of branch formation, and especially to emphasise the compatibility of branching with relativity; the paper is intended to illuminate matters both for foundational work, and for the application of quantum theory to non-isolated systems.2024-02-10T00:34:57ZNadia BlackshawNick HuggettJames Ladymanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06037v1Berta Karlik -- The Grande Dame of the Vienna Radium Institute2024-02-08T20:19:19ZBerta Karlik was an Austrian physicist who was not only among the early radioactivity researchers and nuclear physicists in Vienna, but also pioneered a woman's academic career in Austria. She was the first woman at the University of Vienna to acquire the venia legendi in physics, and the first full professor at a philosophical faculty in Austria. For almost thirty years she was the head of the Institute for Radium Research of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.2024-02-08T20:19:19Z12 pages, 5 figuresTranslation of Berta Karlik - Die Grande Dame des Wiener Radiuminstituts, Mensch - Wissenschaft - Magie, Mitt. Oesterr. Ges. fuer Wissenschaftsgesch. 27 (2010) 91-108Brigitte Strohmaierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06783v2Are observers reducible to structures?2024-02-08T18:26:14ZPhysical systems are characterized by their structure and dynamics. But the physical laws only express relations, and their symmetries allow any possible relational structure to be also possible in a different parametrization or basis of the state space. If observers were reducible to their structure, observer-like structures from different parametrizations would identify differently the observables with physical properties. They would perceive the same system as being in a different state. This leads to the question: is there a unique correspondence between observables and physical properties, or this correspondence is relative to the parametrization in which the observer-like structure making the observation exists?
I show that, if observer-like structures from all parametrizations were observers, their memory of the external world would have no correspondence with the facts, it would be no better than random guess. Since our experience shows that this is not the case, there must be more to the observers than their structure. This implies that the correspondence between observables and physical properties is unique, and it becomes manifest through the observers. This result is independent of the measurement problem, applying to both quantum and classical physics. It has implications for structural realism, philosophy of mind, the foundations of quantum and classical physics, and quantum-first approaches.2023-07-13T14:48:50Z9 pages. Comments welcome!Ovidiu Cristinel Stoicahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05661v1Quantum ontology de-naturalized: What we can't learn from quantum mechanics2024-02-08T13:26:13ZPhilosophers of science commonly connect ontology and science, stating that these disciplines maintain a two-way relationship: on the one hand, we can extract ontology from scientific theories; on the other hand, ontology provides the realistic content of our scientific theories. In this article, we will critically examine the process of naturalizing ontology, i.e., confining the work of ontologists merely to the task of pointing out which entities certain theories commit themselves to. We will use non-relativistic quantum mechanics as a case study. We begin by distinguishing two roles for ontology: the first would be characterized by cataloging existing entities according to quantum mechanics; the second would be characterized by establishing more general ontological categories in which existing entities must be classified. We argue that only the first step is available for a naturalistic approach; the second step not being open for determination or anchoring in science. Finally, we also argue that metaphysics is still a step beyond ontology, not contained in either of the two tasks of ontology, being thus even farther from science.2024-02-08T13:26:13ZForthcoming in THEORIA, Special Issue: "Quantum Mechanics and Reality'', 2024Raoni ArroyoJonas R. Becker Arenhart10.1387/theoria.24955http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08689v1Yuri Lvovich Klimontovich, his theory of fluctuations and its impact on the kinetic theory2024-02-07T19:29:34ZYuri L'vovich Klimontovich (28.09.1924--26.10.2002) was an outstanding theoretical physicist who made major contributions to kinetic theory. On the occasion of his 100th birthday we recall his main scientific achievements.2024-02-07T19:29:34ZContrib. Plasma Phys. 64, No. 5, e202400014 (2024)Michael BonitzAnatoly Zagorodny10.1002/ctpp.202400014http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04152v1Towards a process-based approach to consciousness and collapse in quantum mechanics2024-02-06T17:07:41ZAccording to a particular interpretation of quantum mechanics, the causal role of human consciousness in the measuring process is called upon to solve a foundational problem called the "measurement problem". Traditionally, this interpretation is tied up with the metaphysics of substance dualism. As such, this interpretation of quantum mechanics inherits the dualist's mind-body problem. Our working hypothesis is that a process-based approach to the consciousness causes collapse interpretation (CCCI) -- leaning on Whitehead's solution to the mind-body problem -- offers a better metaphysical understanding of consciousness and its role in interpreting quantum mechanics. This article is the kickoff for such a research program in the metaphysics of science.2024-02-06T17:07:41ZForthcoming in Manuscrito vol. 47, n.1, 2024. Special issue: "Scientific Process Ontology and Metaphysics". Url: https://www.scielo.br/j/man/i/2024.v47n1Raoni ArroyoLauro de Matos Nunes FilhoFrederik Moreira dos Santos10.1590/0100-6045.2024.V47N1.RAhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03393v1Quantum panprotopsychism and the combination problem2024-02-04T19:17:28ZWe will argue that a phenomenological analysis of consciousness, similar to that of Husserl, shows that the effects of phenomenal qualities shape our perception of the world. It also shows the way the physical and mathematical sciences operate, allowing us to accurately describe the observed regularities in terms of communicable mathematical laws. The latter say nothing about the intrinsic features of things. They only refer to the observed regularities in their behaviors, providing rigorous descriptions of how the universe works, to which any viable ontology must conform. Classical mechanistic determinism limits everything that can occur to what happens in an instant and leaves no room for novelty or any intrinsic aspect that is not epiphenomenal. The situation changes with quantum probabilistic determinism if one takes seriously the ontology that arises from its axioms of objects, systems in certain states, and the events they produce in other objects. As Bertrand Russell pointed out almost a century ago, an ontology of events, with an internal phenomenal aspect, now known as panprotopsychism, is better suited to explaining the phenomenal aspects of consciousness. The central observation of this paper is that many objections to panpsychism and panprotopsychism, which are usually called the combination problem, arise from implicit hypotheses based on classical physics about supervenience. These are inappropriate at the quantum level, where an exponential number of emergent properties and states arise. The analysis imposes conditions on the possible implementations of quantum cognition mechanisms in the brain.2024-02-04T19:17:28Z18 pages, no figuresMind and Matter, Volume 22, Number 1, July 2024, pp. 51-94(44)Rodolfo GambiniJorge Pullin10.53765/mm2024.51http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01332v1Solitons, dispersive shock waves and Noel Fredrick Smyth2024-02-02T11:36:20ZNoel Frederick Smyth (NFS), a Fellow of the Australian Mathematical Society and a Professor of Nonlinear Waves in the School of Mathematics at the University of Edinburgh, passed away on February 5, 2023. NFS was a prominent figure among applied mathematicians who worked on nonlinear wave theory in a broad range of areas. Throughout his academic career, which spanned nearly forty years, NFS developed mathematical models, ideas, and techniques that have had a large impact on the understanding of wave motion in diverse media. His major research emphasis primarily involved the propagation of solitary waves, or solitons, and dispersive shock waves, or undular bores, in various media, including optical fibers, liquid crystals, shallow waters and atmosphere. Several approaches he developed have proven effective in analyzing the dynamics and modulations of related wave phenomena. This tribute in the journal of Wave Motion aims to provide a brief biographical sketch of NFS, discuss his major research achievements, showcase his scientific competence, untiring mentorship and unwavering dedication, as well as share final thoughts from his former students, colleagues, friends, and family. The authors had a special connection with NFS on both on personal and professional levels and hold deep gratitude for him and his invaluable work. In recognition of his achievements in applied mathematics, Wave Motion hosts a Special Issue entitled "Modelling Nonlinear Wave Phenomena: From Theory to Applications," which presents the recent advancements in this field.2024-02-02T11:36:20ZTo appear in a Special Issue in Wave MotionSaleh BaqerTim MarchantGaetano AssantoTheodoros HorikisDimitri Frantzeskakishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00191v1The development of the concept of exchange forces in the 1930s: close encounters between Europe and Japan and the birth of nuclear theory2024-01-31T21:42:12ZThe onset and the development of the concept of exchange force in quantum physics are historically reconstructed, starting from Heisenberg's seminal contributions in 1926 and going through the great developments in nuclear physics, which allowed the emergence of the idea of force mediating virtual quanta. Although most of such work was performed in Europe, the last and decisive effort in this long path was carried out by Japanese scientists in the 1930s. This is the main focus of the present work, which retraces the achievements of Yukawa and Tomonaga, whose results and mutual interactions are carefully analyzed and related to those of European physicists.2024-01-31T21:42:12Z37 pages, no figures, Springer Nature style, submitted for publicationMarco Di MauroSalvatore EspositoAdele Naddeohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00577v1The Smoke of Zaanen2024-01-31T16:03:38ZTheoretical physics suffered a major loss with the death of my dear friend Jan Zaanen on January 18. This note is my remembrance of him.2024-01-31T16:03:38ZPhilip W. Phillipshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12516v2Conservation Principles in AQUAL2024-01-30T03:54:19ZWe consider conservation of momentum in AQUAL, a field-theoretic extension to Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND). We show that while there is a sense in which momentum is conserved, it is only if momentum is attributed to the gravitational field, and thus Newton's third law fails as usually understood. We contrast this situation with that of Newtonian gravitation on a field theoretic formulation. We then briefly discuss the situation in TeVeS, a relativistic theory that has AQUAL as a classical limit.2024-01-23T06:18:43ZWe have become aware of a serious error in the arguments of section III.B. This error is such that the main claim of that section does not follow. Since these arguments are integral to the thesis of the manuscript, we withdraw the manuscript at this time while working on corrections. The authors are grateful to Moti Milgrom for kindly pointing out the errorClara BradleyJames Owen Weatherallhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16323v1Robustness and the Event Horizon Telescope: the case of the first image of M87*2024-01-29T17:26:48ZWe examine the justification for taking the Event Horizon Telescope's famous 2019 image to be a reliable representation of the region surrounding a black hole. We argue that it takes the form of a robustness argument, with the resulting image being robust across variation in a range of data-analysis pipelines. We clarify the sense of "robustness" operating here and show how it can account for the reliability of astrophysical inferences, even in cases -- like the EHT -- where these inferences are based on experiments that are (for all practical purposes) unique. This has consequences far beyond the 2019 image.2024-01-29T17:26:48Z32 pages, forthcoming in Philosophy of PhysicsJuliusz DoboszewskiJamee Elderhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12030v2Historical curiosity: how asymptotic freedom of the Yang-Mills theory could have been discovered three times before Gross, Wilczek, and Politzer, but was not2024-01-28T23:28:45ZThis article was published in 2001 in Festschrift "At the Frontier of Particle Physics; Handbook of QCD", Ed. M. Shifman, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), Vol. 1, page 126. Asymptotic freedom as the basic property of QCD was discovered by Gross, Wilczek, and Politzer in 1973. Personal recollections of David Gross which are being published in this Volume vividly describe the historical background and the chain of events which led to this fundamental breakthrough. Unfortunately, I failed to obtain Politzer's side of the story. Some details can be found in an interview which Prof. Politzer gave to R. Crease and C. Mann on February 21, 1985 \cite{DP}. Below I acquaint the reader with the pre-1973 appearances of asymptotic freedom which, unfortunately, went unnoticed2022-03-22T20:37:46Z6 pages, no figures. First published in 2001 in "At the Frontier of Particle Physics; Handbook of QCD", Ed. M. Shifman, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), Vol. 1, page 126 V2. One footnote added. One reference extendedM. Shifmanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15790v1The Combination Problem for Relational Quantum Mechanics2024-01-28T22:40:16ZThis article uses the existing literature on the panpsychist combination problem as a starting point to think about how to address a structurally similar combination problem in relational quantum mechanics. I note some similarities and differences between the two problems, and I consider various proposed solutions to the panpsychist problem, assessing the prospects for a similar solution in the context of RQM. I argue that overall the prospects for solving RQM's combination problem look better for RQM with cross-perspective links than for orthodox versions of RQM.2024-01-28T22:40:16ZEmily Adlam